不同水分调亏处理对‘瑞都科美’葡萄生长特性和果实品质的影响

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-1318

园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 2144-2168.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-1318

不同水分调亏处理对‘瑞都科美’葡萄生长特性和果实品质的影响

王晓玥¹, 任建成¹, 张聪颖², 刘振华¹, 卢浩成¹, 闫爱玲¹, 张丽霞¹, 王慧玲¹^,^*(), 孙磊¹^,^*()

¹ 北京市农林科学院林业果树研究所，北京市落叶果树工程技术研究中心，农业农村部华北地区园艺作物生物学与种质创制重点实验室，农业农村部华北都市农业重点实验室，北京 100093
² 贵州省六盘水市水文水资源局，贵州六盘水 553000

收稿日期:2026-03-05 修回日期:2026-06-12 出版日期:2026-07-25 发布日期:2026-07-23
通讯作者:
^* E-mail：wanghuiling@baafs.net.cn，
sunlei@baafs.net.cn
基金资助:
北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项(KJCX20240407); 北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项(KJCX20251002); 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资助(CARS-29); 准格尔旗科技计划项目(2022YY-02)

Effects of Different Regulated Deficit Irrigation Treatments on Growth and Fruit Quality of‘Ruidu Kemei’Grape

WANG Xiaoyue¹, REN Jiancheng¹, ZHANG Congying², LIU Zhenhua¹, LU Haocheng¹, YAN Ailing¹, ZHANG Lixia¹, WANG Huiling¹^,^*(), SUN Lei¹^,^*()

¹ Institute of Forestry and Pomology， Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences;Beijing Engineering Research Center for Deciduous Fruit Trees;Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops（North China），Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture（North China），Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs， Beijing 100093， China
² Liupanshui Hydrology and Water Resources Bureau of Guizhou Province， Liupanshui， Guizhou 553000， China

Received:2026-03-05 Revised:2026-06-12 Published:2026-07-25 Online:2026-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以玫瑰香型葡萄‘瑞都科美’为试材，采用冷棚栽培，滴灌供水，在坐果期和转色期分别设置充分灌溉（65% ~ 75%田间持水量，FC）、轻度水分胁迫（50% ~ 60% FC）和中度水分胁迫（35% ~ 45% FC）3个水平，共9个处理，系统探究水分调亏对植株光合特性、新梢生长、果实理化品质及单萜化合物积累的影响，结合主成分分析（PCA）开展综合评价。结果表明：坐果期水分胁迫可在维持净光合速率稳定的同时，有效抑制新梢冗余生长，但会导致单粒质量下降。转色期是调控风味与香气形成的关键阶段，此阶段适度的水分胁迫能显著提高果实固酸比，并促进单萜化合物的积累。聚类分析与变量投影重要性（VIP）分析表明，两年的水分胁迫处理均显著促进了单萜化合物的积累，其中两年共同筛选出的关键差异物质为β-月桂烯、顺式-氧化玫瑰和香叶醇，是响应水分调亏的关键香气组分。气味活性值（OAV）分析表明，顺式-氧化玫瑰、里那醇和香叶醇是果实特征香气的主要贡献化合物。基于两年主成分分析的综合评价，坐果期充分灌溉 + 转色期轻度水分胁迫处理表现最佳，能够协同实现生长调控与品质提升，为玫瑰香型葡萄节水灌溉高效栽培提供了可行的灌溉策略。

关键词: 葡萄, 调亏灌溉, 玫瑰香型, 单萜, 果实品质, 光合特性

Abstract:

The Muscat-flavored table grape cultivar‘Ruidu Kemei’was used as the experimental material. Plants were grown in a plastic greenhouse with drip irrigation. Three irrigation levels were applied at the fruit set and veraison stages：full irrigation（65%-75% of field capacity，FC），mild water deficit（50%-60% FC），and moderate water deficit（35%-45% FC），resulting in a total of nine treatments. The effects of regulated deficit irrigation（RDI）on photosynthetic characteristics，shoot growth，fruit physicochemical quality，and the composition and content of monoterpenes were systematically measured. Principal component analysis（PCA）was used for comprehensive evaluation. The results indicated that water deficit applied at fruit set effectively suppressed excessive shoot growth while maintaining a stable net photosynthetic rate，but it reduced single berry weight. Veraison was identified as a critical stage for enhancing berry flavor and aroma accumulation. Moderate water deficit during this stage significantly increased the total soluble solids to titratable acidity ratio and promoted the accumulation of monoterpene compounds. Cluster analysis and variable importance in projection（VIP）analysis showed that deficit irrigation over two years notably enhanced monoterpene accumulation，with β-myrcene，cis-rose oxide and geraniol being the key signature monoterpene components in response to water deficit. The OAV analysis indicated that cis-rose oxide，linalool，and geraniol were the main contributing compounds to the characteristic aroma of the fruit. Based on the two-year PCA evaluation，full irrigation at fruit set followed by mild deficit irrigation at veraison achieved the best overall performance. This irrigation strategy synergistically optimizes growth regulation and fruit quality improvement，providing a feasible approach for water-saving and high-efficiency cultivation of Muscat-flavored table grapes.

Key words: grapevine, regulated deficit irrigation, muscat flavor, monoterpene, fruit quality, photosynthetic characteristic

王晓玥, 任建成, 张聪颖, 刘振华, 卢浩成, 闫爱玲, 张丽霞, 王慧玲, 孙磊. 不同水分调亏处理对‘瑞都科美’葡萄生长特性和果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(7): 2144-2168.

WANG Xiaoyue, REN Jiancheng, ZHANG Congying, LIU Zhenhua, LU Haocheng, YAN Ailing, ZHANG Lixia, WANG Huiling, SUN Lei. Effects of Different Regulated Deficit Irrigation Treatments on Growth and Fruit Quality of‘Ruidu Kemei’Grape[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(7): 2144-2168.

图/表 14

参考文献 95

[1]	Aasamaa K, Sõber A, Hartung W, Niinemets Ü. 2002. Rate of stomatal opening,shoot hydraulic conductance and photosynthetic characteristics in relation to leaf abscisic acid concentration in six temperate deciduous trees. Tree Physiology, 22 (4):267-276. pmid: 11874723
[2]	Acevedo-opazo C, Ortega-farias S, Fuentes S. 2010. Effects of grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.) water status on water consumption,vegetative growth and grape quality:an irrigation scheduling application to achieve regulated deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 97 (7):956-964. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.025 URL
[3]	Bai X Y, Guo L G, Lin R Z, Han L, Xiao K. 2021. Characterization of yields,osmotic stress-associated traits,and expression patterns of ABA receptor genes in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. International Journal of Plant Production, 15 (3):419-429. doi: 10.1007/s42106-021-00146-4
[4]	Bertamini M, Zulini L, Muthuchelian K, Nedunchezhian N. 2006. Effect of water deficit on photosynthetic and other physiological responses in grapevine(Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling)plants. Photosynthetica, 44 (1):151-154. doi: 10.1007/s11099-005-0173-0 URL
[5]	Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt K V. 2003. Antioxidants,oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress:a review. Annals of Botany,91:179-194.
[6]	Bowen A J, Reynolds A G. 2012. Odor potency of aroma compounds in riesling and vidal blanc table wines and ice wines by gas chromatography- olfactometry-mass spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,60:2874-2883.
[7]	Brillante L, Martínez-Lüscher J, Kurtural S K. 2018. Applied water and mechanical canopy management affect berry and wine phenolic and aroma composition of grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.,cv. Syrah)in central California. Scientia Horticulturae,227:261-271.
[8]	Buesa I, Pérez D, Castel J, Intrigliolo D S, Castel J R. 2017. Effect of deficit irrigation on vine performance and grape composition of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Muscat of Alexandria. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 23 (2):251-259. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12280 URL
[9]	Castro-Vázquez L, Díaz-Maroto M C, Pérez-Coello M S. 2007. Aroma composition and new chemical markers of Spanish citrus honeys. Food Chemistry,103:601-606.
[10]	Chalmers D J, Wilson I B. 1978. Productivity of peach trees:tree growth and water stress in relation to fruit growth and assimilate demand. Annals of Botany,42:285-294.
[11]	Chalmers D J. 1975. Productivity of peach trees:factors affecting dry-weight distribution during tree growth. Annals of Botany,39:423-432.
[12]	Chaves M M, Santos T P, Souza C R, Ortuño M F, Rodrigues M L, Lopes C M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S. 2007. Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality. Annals of Applied Biology, 150 (2):237-252. doi: 10.1111/aab.2007.150.issue-2 URL
[13]	Chávez-Simental J A, Alvarez-Reyna V de P. 2018. Ecofisiología de seis variedades de frijol bajo las condiciones climáticas de la región lagunera. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas, 3 (2):299-309. doi: 10.29312/remexca.v3i2.1464 URL
[14]	Chen Linan, Liu Xiuchun, Rong Chuansheng, Han Xiaori, Sun Zhanxiang. 2019. Effects of alternate partial root-zone irrigation on growth and distribution of dry matter in young grape tree. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21 (5):152-158. (in Chinese)
	陈丽楠, 刘秀春, 荣传胜, 韩晓日, 孙占祥. 2019. 交替根区灌溉对葡萄幼树生长及干物质分配的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 21 (5):152-158. doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2018.0523
[15]	Chen Nana. 2017. Effects of water deficit on growth,soil microorganisms and enzyme activities of grape under delayed cultivation[M. D. Dissertation]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	陈娜娜. 2017. 水分亏缺对设施延后栽培葡萄生长、土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[硕士论文]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学.
[16]	Chen Shaoli, Guo Xiuwu. 2009. Identification and study on drought resistance of grape rootstocks. China Fruits,(1):38-42. (in Chinese)
	陈绍莉, 郭修武. 2009. 葡萄砧木的抗旱性鉴定与研究. 中国果树,(1):38-42.
[17]	Chen Zumin, Jiao Nuoya, Zhang Yanxia, Shi Xiaomin, Guo Shuaiqi, Gao Hu, Wang Zhenping. 2021. Effects of water stress on the volatile compounds and related gene expression in‘Muscat Hamburg’grape berries. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 48 (5):883-896. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0450
	陈祖民, 校诺娅, 张艳霞, 史晓敏, 郭帅奇, 高虎, 王振平. 2021. 水分胁迫对‘玫瑰香’葡萄果实挥发性化合物及相关基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 48 (5):883-896. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0450
[18]	Cheng F, Sun H, Shi H, Zhao Z, Wang Q, Zhang J. 2012. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on the vegetative and generative properties of the pear cultivar‘Yali’. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 14 (1):183-194.
[19]	Cui N B, Du T S, Kang S Z, Li F S, Hu X T, Wang M X, Li Z J. 2009. Relationship between stable carbon isotope discrimination and water use efficiency under regulated deficit irrigation of pear-jujube tree. Agricultural Water Management, 96 (11):1615-1622. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.009 URL
[20]	Demirevska K, Simova-Stoilova L, Vassileva V, Feller U. 2008. Rubisco and some chaperone protein responses to water stress and rewatering at early seedling growth of drought sensitive and tolerant wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regulation, 56 (2):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s10725-008-9288-1 URL
[21]	Du T S, Kang S Z, Yan B Y, Zhang J H. 2013. Alternate furrow irrigation:a practical way to improve grape quality and water use efficiency in arid northwest China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12 (3):509-519. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60252-X URL
[22]	Fang Yulin, Sun Wei, Wan Li, Hui Zhumei, Liu Xu, Zhang Zhenwen. 2013. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation(RDI)on wine grape growth and fruit quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 46 (13):2730-2738. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.13.011
	房玉林, 孙伟, 万力, 惠竹梅, 刘旭, 张振文. 2013. 调亏灌溉对酿酒葡萄生长及果实品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 46 (13):2730-2738. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.13.011
[23]	Fenoll J, Manso A, Hellin P, Ruiz L, Flores P. 2009. Changes in the aromatic composition of the Vitis vinifera grape Muscat Hamburg during ripening. Food Chemistry, 114 (2):420-428. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.060 URL
[24]	Han Z X, Rana M M, Liu G F, Gao M J, Li D X, Wu F G, Li X B, Wan X C, Wei S. 2017. Data on green tea flavor determinantes as affected by cultivars and manufacturing processes. Data in Brief,10:492-498.
[25]	Herrera J C, Savoi S, Dostal J, Elezovic K, Chatzisavva M, Forneck A, Savi T. 2024. The legacy of past droughts induces water-sparingly behaviour in Grüner Veltliner grapevines. Plant Biology, 28 (3):601-609. doi: 10.1111/plb.v28.3 URL
[26]	Hu Hongyuan, Ma Danyang, Li Shuangcen, Wang Zhenping. 2016. Effects of water stress on main drought resistance physiological indices and quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grape. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 35 (5):79-84. (in Chinese)
	胡宏远, 马丹阳, 李双岑, 王振平. 2016. 水分胁迫对赤霞珠葡萄主要抗旱生理指标及品质的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 35 (5):79-84.
[27]	Ji Xuewei, Cheng Ziyong, Zhao Xia, Zhang Rui. 2015. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on yield and quality of wine grape under drip irrigation in desert oasis. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29 (4):184-188. (in Chinese)
	纪学伟, 成自勇, 赵霞, 张芮. 2015. 调亏灌溉对荒漠绿洲区滴灌酿酒葡萄产量及品质的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 29 (4):184-188.
[28]	Ju Y, Francoise U, Li D, Zhang Y, Liu B, Sun M, Fang Y, Wei X. 2022. Effect of light-selective sunshade net on the quality and aromatic characteristics of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wine:exploratory experiment on strong solar irradiance in northwestern China. Food Chemistry:X, 17:100510. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100510 URL
[29]	Ju Y L, Yang B H, He S, Tu T Y, Zhuo M, Fang Y L, Sun X Y. 2019. Anthocyanin accumulation and biosynthesis are modulated by regulated deficit irrigation in Cabernet Sauvignon(Vitis Vinifera L.) grapes and wines. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,135:469-479.
[30]	Kato Y, Okami M. 2011. Root morphology,hydraulic conductivity and plant water relations of high-yielding rice grown under aerobic conditions. Annals of Botany, 108 (3):575-583. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr184 URL
[31]	Kovalenko Y, Tindjau R, Madilao L L, Castellarin S D. 2021. Regulated deficit irrigation strategies affect the terpene accumulation in Gewürztraminer(Vitis Vinifera L.)grapes grown in the Okanagan Valley. Food Chemistry, 341 (P2):128172. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128172 URL
[32]	Kumar P, Kumar D, Pal S, Singh S. 2025. Plant secondary metabolites in defense against phytopathogens:mechanisms,biosynthesis,and applications. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 138:102639. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2025.102639 URL
[33]	Lei Tingwu, Zeng Dechao, Wang Xiaowei, Peter Jerry, Li Aikeng, Peter Mitchell, Zeng Peisan, Xu Yifei, Yan Goodwin, Xu Binghua. 1991. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on growth and yield of mature peach trees. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,(4):63-69. (in Chinese)
	雷廷武, 曾德超, 王小伟, 彼得 · 杰里, 李蔼铿, 彼得 · 米切尔, 曾佩三, 许一飞, 阎 · 古德温, 许炳华. 1991. 调控亏水度灌溉对成龄桃树生长和产量的影响. 农业工程学报,(4):63-69.
[34]	Li F M, Liu X L, Li S Q. 2001. Effects of early soil water distribution on the dry matter partition between roots and shoots of winter wheat. Agricultural Water Management, 49 (3):163-171. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00088-9 URL
[35]	Li F Q, Deng H L, Wang Y C, Li X, Chen X T, Liu L T, Zhang H J. 2021. Potato growth, photosynthesis,yield,and quality response to regulated deficit drip irrigation under film mulching in a cold and arid environment. Scientific Reports, 11 (1):15888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95340-9
[36]	Li Y Y, Liu N N, Fan H, Su J X, Fei C, Wang K Y, Ma F Y, Isaya K. 2019. Effects of deficit irrigation on photosynthesis,photosynthate allocation,and water use efficiency of sugar beet. Agricultural Water Management,223 (C):105701.
[37]	Li Yashan, Li Hua, Wang Hua, Nan Lijun. 2014. Effects of different irrigation treatments on the growth and fruit quality of Himrod in protected cultivation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 47 (9):1784-1792. (in Chinese)
	李雅善, 李华, 王华, 南立军. 2014. 设施栽培下不同灌溉处理对‘希姆劳特’植株生长及果实的影响. 中国农业科学, 47 (9):1784-1792. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.09.013
[38]	Liu Hongguang, He Xinlin, Wang Yaqin, Yang Huihui. 2010. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on growth and yield of drip irrigated. Journal of Shihezi University(Natural Science), 28 (5):610-613. (in Chinese)
	刘洪光, 何新林, 王雅琴, 杨慧慧. 2010. 调亏灌溉对滴灌葡萄生长与产量的影响. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 28 (5):610-613.
[39]	Liu Jingxia. 2019. Effects of water stress in different growth periods on grape yield and fruit quality[M. D. Dissertation]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	刘静霞. 2019. 不同生育期水分胁迫对酿酒葡萄产量及品质的影响研究[硕士论文]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学.
[40]	Liu Y, Li Q, Yang W, Sun B, Zhou Y, Zheng Y, Huang M, Yang W. 2020. Characterization of the potent odorants in Zanthoxylum armatum DC Prodr. pericarp oil by application of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-olfactometry and odor activity value. Food Chemistry,319:e126564.
[41]	López M I, Sánchez M T, Díaz A, Ramírez P, Morales J. 2007. Influence of a deficit irrigation regime during ripening on berry composition in grapevines(Vitis vinifera L.) grown in semi-arid areas. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition,58:491-507.
[42]	López-Urrea R, Montoro A, Mañas F, López-Fuster P, Fereres E. 2012. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients from lysimeter measurements of mature‘Tempranillo’wine grapes. Agricultural Water Management, 112 (9):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.05.009 URL
[43]	Lovisolo C, Perrone I, Carra A, Ferrandino A, Flexas J, Medrano H, Schubert A. 2010. Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine(Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level:a physiological and molecular update. Functional Plant Biology, 37 (2):98-116. doi: 10.1071/FP09191 URL
[44]	Ma L J, Xing L H, Li Z C, Jiang D H. 2025. Epigenetic control of plant abiotic stress responses. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 52 (2):129-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2024.09.008 URL
[45]	Ma X C, Chang Y Y, Li F F, Yang J F, Ye L, Zhou T, Jin Y, Sheng L, Lu X P. 2024. CsABF3-activated CsSUT 1 pathway is implicated in pre-harvest water deficit inducing sucrose accumulation in citrus fruit. Horticultural Plant Journal, 10 (1):103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2023.07.001 URL
[46]	Mao Nini, Su Xiya, Ren Junpeng, Zhang Kuifeng, Liu Zhaoting. 2022. Effects of water deficit regulation on morphology and photosynthetic characteristics of‘Summer Black’grape leaves. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 50 (16):133-138. (in Chinese)
	毛妮妮, 苏西娅, 任俊鹏, 张奎峰, 刘照亭. 2022. 水分调亏对‘夏黑”葡萄叶片形态及光合特性的影响. 江苏农业科学, 50 (16):133-138.
[47]	Montoro A, López-Urrea R, Sánchez J M. 2017. Meteorological parameters effect on diurnal and nocturnal transpiration and stomatal conductance grapevine. Internet Journal of Viticulture and Enology, 11 (3):1-6.
[48]	Nieves L, Henar M P, Mancha L A, Daniel M, Esperanza V M, David U. 2023. Combined effect of crop forcing and reduced irrigation as techniques to delay the ripening and improve the quality of cv.Tempranillo(Vitis vinifera L.)berries in semi-arid climate conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 288:108469. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108469 URL
[49]	Noguerol-Pato R, Gonzalez-Barreiro C, Cancho-Grande B, Martinez M C, Santiago J L, Simal-Gandara J. 2012. Floral,spicy and herbaceous active odorants in Gran Negro grapes from shoulders and tips into the cluster,and comparison with Brancellao and Mouraton varieties. Food Chemistry,135:2771-2782.
[50]	Ojeda H, Deloire A, Carbonneau A. 2001. Influence of water deficits on grape berry growth. Vitis, 40 (3):141-145.
[51]	Palai G, Caruso G, Gucci R, D’Onofrio C. 2023. Water deficit before veraison is crucial in regulating berry VOCs concentration in Sangiovese grapevines. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14:1117572. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1117572 URL
[52]	Pamungkas S S T, Suwarto, Suprayogi, Farid N. 2022. Drought stress:responses and mechanism in plants. Reviews in Agricultural Science,10:168-185.
[53]	Pan Qiuhong, Duan Changqing, Wang Jun, Zhu Baoqing, He Fei. 2019. Wine chemistry. Beijing: Science Press:164-167. (in Chinese)
	潘秋红, 段长青, 王军, 朱保庆, 何非. 2019. 葡萄酒化学. 北京: 科学出版社:164-167.
[54]	Pan Zhao, Zhou Wenhua, Xiao Yuehuizi. 2018. Quality evaluation of different fresh-eating grape varieties based on principal component analysis. Food & Machinery, 34 (9):139-146. (in Chinese)
	潘照, 周文化, 肖玥惠子. 2018. 基于主成分分析的不同种鲜食葡萄品质评价. 食品与机械, 34 (9):139-146.
[55]	Phung T H, Jung H I, Park J H, Kim J G, Back K, Jung S. 2011. Porphyrin biosynthesis control under water stress:sustained porphyrin status correlates with drought tolerance in transgenic rice. Plant Physiology, 157 (4):1746-1764. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.188276 URL
[56]	Pino J A, Mesa J. 2006. Contribution of volatile compounds to mango(Mangifera indica L.)aroma. Flavour and Fragrance Journal,21:207-213.
[57]	Qiu Yinsheng, Mao Juan, Yue Yuan, Ma Zonghuan. 2022. Effects of different irrigation amounts on the accumulation of organic acids and fruit quality of Pinot Noir grapes. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 57 (3):95-102. (in Chinese)
	仇银生, 毛娟, 岳圆, 马宗桓. 2022. 不同灌水量对黑比诺葡萄有机酸积累及成熟期果实品质的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 57 (3):95-102.
[58]	Ren Tingting, Zhang Tingxiu, Zhan Liang, Zhang Zhichang, Ren Yiran, Ji Xinglong, Wang Peipei, Liu Yuanxia, Meng Qingfu, Liu Gengsen, Fang Jinggui, Leng Xiangpeng. 2025. Effects of different light quality on berry quality of‘Shine Muscat’grape. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 52 (9):2464-2476. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0877
	任婷婷, 张廷秀, 战良, 张志昌, 任怡然, 季兴龙, 王培培, 刘源霞, 孟庆福, 刘更森, 房经贵, 冷翔鹏. 2025. 不同光质补光对设施栽培‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄果实品质的影响. 园艺学报, 52 (9):2464-2476. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0877
[59]	Risco D, Pérez D, Yeves A, Castel J R, Intrigliolo D S. 2014. Early defoliation in a temperate warm and semi-arid Tempranillo vineyard:vine performance and grape composition. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research,20:111-122.
[60]	Seo P J, Park C M. 2009. Auxin homeostasis during lateral root development under drought condition. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 4 (10):1002-1004.
[61]	Shellie K C. 2006. Vine and berry response of Merlot(Vitis vinifera L.) to differential water stress. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57 (4):514-518. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.4.514 URL
[62]	Shohat H, Cheriker H, Kilambi H V, Illouz-Eliaz N, Blum S, Amsellem Z, Tarkowská D, Aharoni A, Eshed Y, Weiss D. 2021. Inhibition of gibberellin accumulation by water deficiency promotes fast and long-term‘drought avoidance’responses in tomato. New Phytologist, 232 (5):1985-1998. doi: 10.1111/nph.17709 pmid: 34541677
[63]	Shou Weisong, Wang Duo, Shen Jia, Xu Xinyang, Zhang Yuejian, He Yanjun. 2024. Identification of SUT family of sucrose transporters in watermelon and their expression analysis in fruit development and stress responses. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 36 (1):94-102. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230188
	寿伟松, 王铎, 沈佳, 许昕阳, 张跃建, 何艳军. 2024. 西瓜蔗糖转运蛋白SUT家族的鉴定及其在果实发育和逆境响应中的表达分析. 浙江农业学报, 36 (1):94-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230188
[64]	Song J Q, Shellie K C, Wang H, Qian M C. 2012. Influence of deficit irrigation and kaolin particle film on grape composition and volatile compounds in Merlot grape(Vitis vinifera L.). Food Chemistry, 134 (2):841-850. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.193 URL
[65]	Sun Hongyong, Zhang Xiying, Shao Liwei. 2009. Regulated deficit irrigation and its application on fruit trees. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 17 (6):1288-1291. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2009.01288 URL
	孙宏勇, 张喜英, 邵立威. 2009. 调亏灌溉在果树上应用的研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 17 (6):1288-1291.
[66]	Tamura H, Boonbumrung S, Yoshizawa T, Varanyanond D W. 2001. The volatile constituents in the peel and pulp of a green Thai Mango,KhieoSawoei cultivar(Mangifera indica L.). Food Science and Technology Research‌,7:72-77.
[67]	Tian Hongen, Wang Qiaoyun. 2022. Current situation and countermeasures for development of grape industry in facility cold shed in Heyang. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 68 (9):113-116. (in Chinese)
	田宏恩, 王巧云. 2022. 合阳县设施冷棚葡萄产业现状及发展对策. 陕西农业科学, 68 (9):113-116.
[68]	Wample R L, Smithyman R. 2002. Regulated deficit irrigation as a water management strategy in Vitis vinifera production. Water Reports(FAO),(22):89-100.
[69]	Wang J F, Abbey T, Kozak B, Madilao L L, Tindjau R, Nin J D, Castellarin S D. 2019. Evolution over the growing season of volatile organic compounds in Viognier(Vitis vinifera L.)grapes under three irrigation regimes. Food Research International,125:108512.
[70]	Wang Jinghai, Zhang Rui, Li Guang, Dai Wenyuan. 2019. Effect of water deficit in different growth periods on water consumption and yield of wine grapes in Hexi desert oasis region. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 39 (3):83-90. (in Chinese)
	汪精海, 张芮, 李广, 戴文渊. 2019. 水分胁迫对河西荒漠绿洲区酿酒葡萄水分利用及产量的跨年度影响. 水土保持通报, 39 (3):83-90.
[71]	Wang Kairong, Li Shicheng, Yang Tianyi, Jiang Aili, Zhang Zhen. 2008. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on growth and fruiting of grape in greenhouse. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,(4):140-143. (in Chinese)
	王开荣, 李世诚, 杨天仪, 蒋爱丽, 章镇. 2008. 调亏灌溉对大棚葡萄生长与结实的影响. 江苏农业科学,(4):140-143.
[72]	Wang X L, Qin R R, Sun R H, Hou X G, Qi L, Shi J. 2018. Effects of plant population density and root-induced cytokinin on the corn compensatory growth during post-drought rewatering. PLoS ONE, 13 (6):e0198878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198878 URL
[73]	Wang Shucheng. 2010. China’s water resources security issue and its countermeasures. Power System and Clean Energy, 26 (9):1-3. (in Chinese)
	汪恕诚. 2010. 中国水资源安全问题及对策. 电网与清洁能源, 26 (9):1-3.
[74]	Wang W, Feng J, Wei L L, Khalil-ur-rehman M, Nieuwenhuizen N J, Yang L N, Zheng H, Tao J M. 2021. Transcriptomics integrated with free and bound terpenoid aroma profiling during‘Shine Muscat’(Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera)grape berry development reveals coordinate regulation of MEP pathway and terpene synthase gene expression. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,69:1413-1429.
[75]	Wang X Y, Wang H L, Zhang G J, Yan A L, Ren J C, Liu Z H, Xu H Y, Sun L. 2022. Effects of fruit bagging treatment with different types of bags on the contents of phenolics and monoterpenes in Muscat-flavored table grapes. Horticulturae, 8:411. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8050411 URL
[76]	Wang Xiaoyue, Zhang Guojun, Sun Lei, Zhao yin, Yan Ailing, Wang Huiling, Ren Jiancheng, Xu Haiying. 2019. Effects of two trellis systems on viticultural characteristics and fruit quality of three table grape cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 52 (7):1150-1163. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.003
	王晓玥, 张国军, 孙磊, 赵印, 闫爱玲, 王慧玲, 任建成, 徐海英. 2019. 2种架式对3个鲜食葡萄品种栽培性状及果实品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 52 (7):1150-1163. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.003
[77]	Wen Y Q, Zhong G Y, Gao Y, Lan Y B, Duan C Q, Pan Q H. 2015. Using the combined analysis of transcripts and metabolites to propose key genes for differential terpene accumulation across two regions. BMC Plant Biology, 15 (1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0631-1 URL
[78]	Wu C, Zhang X, Zhou C, Luo A. 2023. Fruit growth,carbon allocation,and related enzymes in tomato under different irrigation and potassium application regimes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 186 (1):50-64. doi: 10.1002/jpln.v186.1 URL
[79]	Wu Y, Duan S, Zhao L, Gao Z, Luo M, Song S, Xu W, Zhang C, Ma C, Wang S. 2016. Aroma characterization based on aromatic series analysis in table grapes. Scientific Reports, 6:31116. doi: 10.1038/srep31116 pmid: 27487935
[80]	Xiong Junlan, Tan Rui, Kong Haiyan, Bai Xue, Xiong Youcai. 2012. ABA-H₂O₂-mediated stomatal closure in plants. Plant Physiology Journal, 48 (8):739-746. (in Chinese)
	熊俊兰, 谭瑞, 孔海燕, 白雪, 熊友才. 2012. 植物ABA-H₂O₂介导的气孔关闭. 植物生理学报, 48 (8):739-746.
[81]	Xiong Y, McCormack M, Li L, Hall Q, Xiang C B, Sheen J. 2013. Glucose-TOR signalling reprograms the transcriptome and activates meristems. Nature,496:181-186.
[82]	Xu Bin, Zhang Rui, Cheng Ziyong, Huang Ying, Wang Zhongpeng, Zhang Xiaoxia, He Zhaoquan. 2015. Effects of deficit irrigation on growth and quality of greenhouse grape under delayed cultivation in different stages. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 34 (6):86-89. (in Chinese)
	徐斌, 张芮, 成自勇, 黄英, 王忠鹏, 张晓霞, 何兆全. 2015. 不同生育期调亏灌溉对设施延后栽培葡萄生长发育及品质的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 34 (6):86-89.
[83]	Yang Changyu, Zhang Rui, Gao Yanting, Zhang Xiaoyan, Wang Yindi, Zhao Xia, Lin Baojun. 2020. Effects of water regulation in different periods on soil temperature,sugar accumulation and yield of grape under drip irrigation in greenhouse. Ecological Science, 39 (5):48-56. (in Chinese)
	杨昌钰, 张芮, 高彦婷, 张小艳, 王引弟, 赵霞, 蔺宝军. 2020. 不同时期水分调控对温室滴灌葡萄土壤温度、糖分积累及产量的影响. 生态科学, 39 (5):48-56.
[84]	Yang Jiapeng, Dong Rong. 2024. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on grape fruit quality. Agricultural Engineering, 14 (4):114-120. (in Chinese)
	杨嘉鹏, 董荣. 2024. 调亏灌溉技术对葡萄果实品质的影响. 农业工程, 14 (4):114-120.
[85]	Wei Y S, Javed T, Liu T T, Ali A, Gao S J. 2025. Mechanisms of Abscisic acid (ABA) mediated plant defense responses:an updated review. Plant Stress, 15:100724. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2024.100724 URL
[86]	Yuan J H, Dai Z W, Zhao J Y, Li S H. 2009. Distribution of newly fixed ¹⁴C-photoassimilate under deficit irrigation and half-root stress in peach trees. Plant Science,177:691-697.
[87]	Zhang Kekun, Chen Keqin, Li Wanping, Qiao Haorong, Zhang Junxia, Liu Fengzhi, Fang Yulin, Wang Haibo. 2023. Effects of irrigation amount on berry development and aroma components accumulation of Shine Muscat grape in root-restricted cultivation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 56 (1):129-143. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.01.010
	张克坤, 陈可钦, 李婉平, 乔浩蓉, 张俊霞, 刘凤之, 房玉林, 王海波. 2023. 灌水量对限根栽培‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄果实发育与香气物质积累的影响. 中国农业科学, 56 (1):129-143. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.01.010
[88]	Zhang Meihua, Liu Jingxia, Zhang Rui, Cheng Ziyong. 2019. Effects of deficit irrigation on water consumption,yield and quality of wine grape at different growth stages. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 54 (4):53-59. (in Chinese)
	张梅花, 刘静霞, 张芮, 成自勇. 2019. 不同生育期调亏灌溉对酿酒葡萄耗水及产量和品质的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 54 (4):53-59.
[89]	Zhang X Y, Mei X R, Wang Y J, Huang G R, Feng F, Liu X Y, Guo R, Gu F X, Hu X, Yang Z G, Zhong X L, Li Y Z. 2020. Stomatal conductance bears no correlation with transpiration rate in wheat during their diurnal variation under high air humidity. PeerJ,8:e8927.
[90]	Zhang Zhenghong, Cheng Ziyong, Zhang Guoqiang, Zhang Rui. 2014. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on the photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate of greenhouse grape under delayed cultivation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 33 (2):130-133. (in Chinese)
	张正红, 成自勇, 张国强, 张芮. 2014. 调亏灌溉对设施延后栽培葡萄光合速率与蒸腾速率的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 33 (2):130-133.
[91]	Zhao Xia, Zhang Rui, Cheng Ziyong, Ji Xuewei, Gao Yanting, Wang Yindi. 2017. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation at different growth stages on growth and fruit quality of wine grape in desert oasis. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 36 (10):20-23. (in Chinese)
	赵霞, 张芮, 成自勇, 纪学伟, 高彦婷, 王引弟. 2017. 不同生育期调亏灌溉对荒漠绿洲区葡萄生长、产量和品质的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 36 (10):20-23.
[92]	Zhao Weijia, Xiang Xiaofeng, Tong Wenzhe, Yang Weixi, Liang Jine, Duan Xuerong, Hua Yubo, Fan Xuemei, Lan Yibin. 2025. Volatile flavor components and physicochemical indexes of Syrah grapes from Changli and Gaotai region. China Brewing, 44 (8):42-48. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2025.08.007
	赵维佳, 向小凤, 佟文哲, 杨薇熹, 梁晋鄂, 段雪荣, 华玉波, 范雪梅, 兰义宾. 2025. 昌黎和高台产区‘西拉’葡萄果实理化指标及挥发性香气物质研究. 中国酿造, 44 (8):42-48. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2025.08.007
[93]	Zheng Yu, Chen Fu, Zhang Hailin, Tang Heng. 2006. Study on water resources utilization in irrigation field of Beijing. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 3 (6):55-57. (in Chinese)
	郑煜, 陈阜, 张海林, 唐衡. 2006. 北京市灌溉农田水资源利用效率研究. 水土保持研究, 3 (6):55-57.
[94]	Zhou X Y, Li Y, Xiao C, Chen W, Mei M, Wang G F. 2025. High-impact extreme weather and climate events in China:summer 2024 overview. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 42 (6):1064-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00376-024-4462-6
[95]	Zufferey V, François M. 2009. Photosynthèse de la vigne(cv. Chasselas):III. Influence du régime hydrique. Revue Suisse de Viticulture Arboriculture Horticulture, 41 (5):309-312.

处理 Treatment	田间持水量/% Field capacity
处理 Treatment	初花期 Flowering begins	坐果期 Fruit set	转色期 Veraison
T1	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45	35 ~ 45
T2	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45	50 ~ 60
T3	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45	65 ~ 75
T4	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60	35 ~ 45
T5	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60	50 ~ 60
T6	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60	65 ~ 75
T7	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45
T8	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60
T9（对照Control）	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75

处理 Treatment	田间持水量/% Field capacity
处理 Treatment	初花期 Flowering begins	坐果期 Fruit set	转色期 Veraison
T1	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45	35 ~ 45
T2	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45	50 ~ 60
T3	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45	65 ~ 75
T4	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60	35 ~ 45
T5	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60	50 ~ 60
T6	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60	65 ~ 75
T7	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75	35 ~ 45
T8	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75	50 ~ 60
T9（对照Control）	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75	65 ~ 75

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	果穗质量/g Cluster weight	单粒质量/g Single berry weight	横径/cm Berry width	纵径/cm Berry Length	果形指数 Shape index of fruit
2023	T1	269.0 ± 37.6 ab	4.9 ± 0.2 ab	1.87 ± 0.04 ab	2.35 ± 0.03 ab	1.26 ± 0.01 ab
	T2	248.4 ± 21.4 ab	4.1 ± 0.0 b	1.79 ± 0.01 b	2.24 ± 0.01 bc	1.26 ± 0.01 ab
	T3	255.7 ± 27.6 ab	4.3 ± 0.1 ab	1.80 ± 0.04 ab	2.20 ± 0.03 c	1.22 ± 0.04 ab
	T4	213.4 ± 23.3 b	4.0 ± 0.2 c	1.75 ± 0.04 c	2.23 ± 0.02 bc	1.28 ± 0.02 ab
	T5	267.2 ± 13.5 ab	4.3 ± 0.5 ab	1.85 ± 0.02 ab	2.35 ± 0.08 ab	1.27 ± 0.03 ab
	T6	268.7 ± 21.1 ab	5.0 ± 0.0 ab	1.92 ± 0.05 a	2.53 ± 0.08 a	1.32 ± 0.02 a
	T7	354.4 ± 35.3 a	5.3 ± 0.1 a	1.93 ± 0.01 a	2.46 ± 0.03 ab	1.28 ± 0.01 ab
	T8	315.4 ± 18.4 ab	5.2 ± 0.1 ab	1.91 ± 0.02 ab	2.32 ± 0.03 b	1.22 ± 0.00 b
	T9	296.5 ± 27.3 ab	5.0 ± 0.3 ab	1.89 ± 0.02 ab	2.43 ± 0.06 ab	1.29 ± 0.02 ab
2024	T1	347.4 ± 52.5 a	5.5 ± 0.1 ab	2.10 ± 0.02 a	2.60 ± 0.04 a	1.24 ± 0.02 b
	T2	231.9 ± 12.3 a	4.6 ± 0.1 b	1.87 ± 0.01 c	2.30 ± 0.02 b	1.23 ± 0.02 b
	T3	287.7 ± 19.1 a	5.3 ± 0.2 ab	1.91 ± 0.03 bc	2.44 ± 0.05 ab	1.28 ± 0.03 ab
	T4	247.9 ± 25.2 a	4.5 ± 0.0 b	1.79 ± 0.04 c	2.36 ± 0.04 b	1.32 ± 0.02 a
	T5	288.6 ± 27.8 a	4.8 ± 0.1 b	1.82 ± 0.03 c	2.32 ± 0.02 b	1.27 ± 0.01 ab
	T6	260.7 ± 16.1 a	5.4 ± 0.1 ab	1.87 ± 0.02 c	2.38 ± 0.01 b	1.27 ± 0.00 ab
	T7	295.8 ± 17.6 a	5.6 ± 0.3 a	1.96 ± 0.01 b	2.55 ± 0.05 a	1.30 ± 0.03 a
	T8	282.5 ± 20.9 a	5.3 ± 0.2 ab	1.92 ± 0.02 bc	2.49 ± 0.03 a	1.30 ± 0.02 a
	T9	275.7 ± 18.7 a	5.9 ± 0.2 a	1.91 ± 0.01 bc	2.50 ± 0.03 a	1.31 ± 0.03 a

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	果穗质量/g Cluster weight	单粒质量/g Single berry weight	横径/cm Berry width	纵径/cm Berry Length	果形指数 Shape index of fruit
2023	T1	269.0 ± 37.6 ab	4.9 ± 0.2 ab	1.87 ± 0.04 ab	2.35 ± 0.03 ab	1.26 ± 0.01 ab
	T2	248.4 ± 21.4 ab	4.1 ± 0.0 b	1.79 ± 0.01 b	2.24 ± 0.01 bc	1.26 ± 0.01 ab
	T3	255.7 ± 27.6 ab	4.3 ± 0.1 ab	1.80 ± 0.04 ab	2.20 ± 0.03 c	1.22 ± 0.04 ab
	T4	213.4 ± 23.3 b	4.0 ± 0.2 c	1.75 ± 0.04 c	2.23 ± 0.02 bc	1.28 ± 0.02 ab
	T5	267.2 ± 13.5 ab	4.3 ± 0.5 ab	1.85 ± 0.02 ab	2.35 ± 0.08 ab	1.27 ± 0.03 ab
	T6	268.7 ± 21.1 ab	5.0 ± 0.0 ab	1.92 ± 0.05 a	2.53 ± 0.08 a	1.32 ± 0.02 a
	T7	354.4 ± 35.3 a	5.3 ± 0.1 a	1.93 ± 0.01 a	2.46 ± 0.03 ab	1.28 ± 0.01 ab
	T8	315.4 ± 18.4 ab	5.2 ± 0.1 ab	1.91 ± 0.02 ab	2.32 ± 0.03 b	1.22 ± 0.00 b
	T9	296.5 ± 27.3 ab	5.0 ± 0.3 ab	1.89 ± 0.02 ab	2.43 ± 0.06 ab	1.29 ± 0.02 ab
2024	T1	347.4 ± 52.5 a	5.5 ± 0.1 ab	2.10 ± 0.02 a	2.60 ± 0.04 a	1.24 ± 0.02 b
	T2	231.9 ± 12.3 a	4.6 ± 0.1 b	1.87 ± 0.01 c	2.30 ± 0.02 b	1.23 ± 0.02 b
	T3	287.7 ± 19.1 a	5.3 ± 0.2 ab	1.91 ± 0.03 bc	2.44 ± 0.05 ab	1.28 ± 0.03 ab
	T4	247.9 ± 25.2 a	4.5 ± 0.0 b	1.79 ± 0.04 c	2.36 ± 0.04 b	1.32 ± 0.02 a
	T5	288.6 ± 27.8 a	4.8 ± 0.1 b	1.82 ± 0.03 c	2.32 ± 0.02 b	1.27 ± 0.01 ab
	T6	260.7 ± 16.1 a	5.4 ± 0.1 ab	1.87 ± 0.02 c	2.38 ± 0.01 b	1.27 ± 0.00 ab
	T7	295.8 ± 17.6 a	5.6 ± 0.3 a	1.96 ± 0.01 b	2.55 ± 0.05 a	1.30 ± 0.03 a
	T8	282.5 ± 20.9 a	5.3 ± 0.2 ab	1.92 ± 0.02 bc	2.49 ± 0.03 a	1.30 ± 0.02 a
	T9	275.7 ± 18.7 a	5.9 ± 0.2 a	1.91 ± 0.01 bc	2.50 ± 0.03 a	1.31 ± 0.03 a

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	可溶性固形物/% Total soluble solids	可滴定酸（g · L^-1） Titratable acidity	固酸比 Solid acid ratio
2023	T1	16.29 ± 0.39 ab	3.16 ± 0.20 b	53.35 ± 4.33 ab
	T2	15.65 ± 0.20 ab	3.16 ± 0.34 b	54.21 ± 6.24 ab
	T3	15.26 ± 0.47 c	3.62 ± 0.59 b	51.81 ± 8.43 ab
	T4	16.50 ± 0.09 ab	2.43 ± 0.14 b	69.43 ± 3.99 a
	T5	15.68 ± 0.19 ab	2.63 ± 0.17 b	61.56 ± 4.29 a
	T6	15.43 ± 0.32 b	2.96 ± 0.15 b	52.87 ± 2.38 ab
	T7	16.73 ± 0.26 a	3.41 ± 0.23 b	50.33 ± 2.87 ab
	T8	16.63 ± 0.18 a	3.37 ± 0.24 b	51.31 ± 3.95 ab
	T9	16.13 ± 0.18 ab	4.47 ± 0.25 a	36.83 ± 2.03 b
2024	T1	16.46 ± 0.57 a	4.46 ± 0.30 ab	37.20 ± 1.30 b
	T2	16.60 ± 0.61 a	3.92 ± 0.03 ab	42.77 ± 1.75 ab
	T3	16.88 ± 0.25 a	5.06 ± 0.62 a	34.66 ± 4.05 b
	T4	16.50 ± 0.39 a	4.48 ± 0.34 ab	37.35 ± 3.25 b
	T5	17.90 ± 0.30 a	3.57 ± 0.10 b	49.96 ± 2.32 a
	T6	17.32 ± 0.19 a	4.27 ± 0.09 ab	40.74 ± 1.04 ab
	T7	17.34 ± 0.19 a	3.99 ± 0.04 ab	43.39 ± 0.63 ab
	T8	17.82 ± 0.19 a	4.07 ± 0.26 ab	44.61 ± 3.34 ab
	T9	16.50 ± 0.07 a	4.65 ± 0.23 ab	35.87 ± 1.91 b

不同水分调亏处理对‘瑞都科美’葡萄生长特性和果实品质的影响

Effects of Different Regulated Deficit Irrigation Treatments on Growth and Fruit Quality of‘Ruidu Kemei’Grape

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 95

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数:

编号 Number	化合物 Compound	T1	T2	T3	T4	T5	T6	T7	T8	T9
M1	β-月桂烯 β-Myrcene	230.9 ± 4.0 b	250.1 ± 19.9 b	243.8 ± 10.8 b	157.7 ± 10.4 c	200.7 ± 16.2 bc	268.7 ± 22.6 b	331.7 ± 30.3 a	350.5 ± 7.9 a	221.8 ± 22.8 bc
M2	柠檬烯 Limonene	32.7 ± 1.1 bc	35.9 ± 3.2 b	39.6 ± 1.7 b	23.4 ± 1.3 c	30.2 ± 3.1 bc	38.3 ± 3.1 b	51.1 ± 5.8 a	53.8 ± 1.0 a	28.1 ± 2.4 bc
M3	水芹烯 Phellandrene	30.2 ± 0.7 bc	32.7 ± 1.8 b	32.8 ± 0.9 b	24.2 ± 1.2 c	28.0 ± 2.1 bc	34.2 ± 1.8 b	41.1 ± 3.5 a	43.1 ± 0.2 a	28.7 ± 1.4 bc
M4	β-反式-罗勒烯 β-trans-Ocimene	107.5 ± 5.1 bc	114.7 ± 9.7 b	118.1 ± 2.0 b	67.4 ± 4.8 c	100.1 ± 13 bc	126.8 ± 11.6 b	168.2 ± 21.3 a	170.9 ± 2.8 a	90.0 ± 8.1 bc
M5	γ-松油烯 γ-Terpinen	10.3 ± 0.7 ab	10.1 ± 0.4 ab	10.6 ± 0.3 ab	8.4 ± 0.3 b	10.9 ± 1.5 ab	10.4 ± 0.5 ab	12.5 ± 1.0 ab	14.0 ± 1.6 a	9.5 ± 0.4 b
M6	β-顺式-罗勒烯 β-cis-Ocimene	156.1 ± 4.3 c	173.4 ± 15.3 c	186.0 ± 5.7 bc	99.2 ± 8.8 d	148.3 ± 19.2 c	187.9 ± 18.4 b	229.9 ± 17.1 ab	261.9 ± 7.6 a	134.4 ± 11.9 cd
M7	异松油烯 Terpinolen	100.0 ± 1.4 c	103.0 ± 5.1 c	120.7 ± 2.2 b	88.7 ± 2.2 c	98.0 ± 3.1 c	102.5 ± 4.6 c	131.7 ± 8.4 ab	139.5 ± 2.7 a	91.2 ± 2.2 c
M8	顺式-氧化玫瑰 cis-Rose oxide	11.0 ± 0.0 bc	11.2 ± 0.0 bc	11.0 ± 0.0 bc	10.7 ± 0.0 c	11.2 ± 0.1 b	11.3 ± 0.2 b	11.8 ± 0.2 a	11.7 ± 0.1 a	11.1 ± 0.0 bc
M9	反式-氧化玫瑰 trans-Rose oxide	ND	ND	1.5	ND	ND	ND	1.9	ND	ND
M10	别罗勒烯 Allo-ocimene	27.8 ± 0.4 bc	30.1 ± 2.2 bc	33.6 ± 1.0 b	20.6 ± 1.2 c	27.0 ± 2.2 bc	31.6 ± 3.5 b	41.0 ± 4.9 a	44.3 ± 0.6 a	25.1 ± 1.3 bc
M11	(E,Z) -别罗勒烯 (E,Z)-Allo- Ocimene	14.1 ± 0.1 bc	14.4 ± 0.5 bc	15.3 ± 0.3 b	11.9 ± 0.3 c	14.0 ± 0.6 bc	15.1 ± 1.0 b	17.6 ± 1.3 a	17.7 ± 0.2 a	13.1 ± 0.3 bc
M12	cis-呋喃型氧化里那醇 cis-Furan linalool oxide	291.9 ± 12.1 c	591.0 ± 9.7 ab	382.7 ± 10.9 c	190.3 ± 17.8 d	308.4 ± 19.4 c	634.2 ± 35.4 ab	567.5 ± 50.1 b	678.2 ± 39.2 a	281.3 ± 20.0 c
M13	trans-呋喃型氧化里那醇 trans-Furan linalool oxide	200.9 ± 9.7 c	223.4 ± 8.0 bc	241.1 ± 10.5 b	116.8 ± 13.1 e	189.6 ± 11.7 cd	275.6 ± 24.9 ab	306.8 ± 24.3 a	328.4 ± 11.8 a	155.0 ± 11.6 d
M14	橙花醚 Nerol oxide	10.1 ± 0.2 d	10.8 ± 0.3 cd	11.6 ± 0.2 c	9.0 ± 0.2 e	10.2 ± 0.1 d	10.8 ± 0.3 cd	12.5 ± 0.5 b	14.2 ± 0.1 a	9.1 ± 0.1 e
M15	香茅醇 Citronellal	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M16	里那醇 Linalool	7 939.3 ± 207.7 a	8 198.5 ± 134.9 a	7 311.6 ± 366.3 a	5 654.4 ± 738.6 b	7 663.7 ± 410.3 a	8 610.6 ± 488.6 a	9 424.1 ± 844.0 a	9 451.9 ± 276.2 a	9 016.2 ± 237.6 a
M17	脱氢里那醇 Hortrineol	216.5 ± 12.2 d	307.1 ± 26.9 c	341.2 ± 21.2 c	126.3 ± 16.5 d	193.5 ± 17.1 d	297.1 ± 17.7 c	425.5 ± 45.0 b	582.0 ± 12.5 a	149.1 ± 17.2 d
M18	4-松油醇 4-Terpineol	72.8 ± 5.4 d	112.9 ± 11.9 c	128.1 ± 9.4 c	33.1 ± 7.3 d	62.8 ± 7.5 d	108.6 ± 7.8 c	165.2 ± 20.0 b	234.3 ± 5.4 a	43.2 ± 7.5 d
M19	橙花醛 Neral	14.3 ± 0.0 c	14.4 ± 0.0 b	14.5 ± 0.0 b	ND	14.4 ± 0.0 b	14.6 ± 0.0 a	14.7 ± 0.0 a	14.7 ± 0.0 a	ND
M20	α-松油醇 α-Terpineol	35.2 ± 3.6 cd	48.6 ± 4.4 c	76.9 ± 4.1 b	22.2 ± 2.4 d	33.4 ± 2.6 cd	45.8 ± 4.0 c	76.1 ± 8.0 b	99.7 ± 4.8 a	21.2 ± 2.4 d
M21	香叶醛 Geranial	9.2 ± 0.1 b	10.1 ± 0.1 ab	11.5 ± 0.8 a	8.5 ± 0.1 c	10.3 ± 0.1 ab	10.7 ± 0.3 ab	11.4 ± 0.1 a	11.7 ± 0.1 a	10.3 ± 0.7 ab
M22	β-香茅醇 β-Citronellol	18.4 ± 1.8 c	24.6 ± 0.7 b	23.0 ± 0.6 bc	12.3 ± 0.9 e	16.7 ± 1.1 d	22.5 ± 1.6 bc	30.0 ± 2.8 a	32.3 ± 1.3 a	14.7 ± 0.7 de
M23	γ-香叶醇 γ-Geraniol	8.5 ± 0.0 a	8.9 ± 0.1 a	8.9 ± 0.1 a	ND	8.9 ± 0.0 a	9.5 ± 0.2 a	10.1 ± 0.0 a	15.7 ± 5.4 a	13.8 ± 5.4 a
M24	橙花醇 Nerol	24.3 ± 1.2 e	32.9 ± 1.8 c	41.4 ± 1.7 c	16.3 ± 1.7 f	28.8 ± 1.2 d	38.7 ± 3.8 c	56.1 ± 4.0 b	65.7 ± 2.0 a	21.1 ± 2.0 ef
M25	顺式-异香叶醇 cis-Isogeraniol	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	8.3 ± 0.0 b	8.4 ± 0.0 a	ND
M26	反式-异香叶醇 trans-Isogeraniol	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	8.4 ± 0.0 b	8.4 ± 0.0 a	ND
M27	β-大马烯酮 Damascenone	ND	10.6 ± 3.6 c	17.0 ± 1.4 a	ND	ND	9.6 ± 3.2 c	13.4 ± 0.8 b	16.6 ± 1.0 a	ND
M28	香叶醇 Geraniol	84.9 ± 7.2 d	134.9 ± 9.3 c	164.4 ± 2.4 c	41.4 ± 5.6 e	133.9 ± 7.4 c	163.9 ± 22.0 c	248.4 ± 14.3 b	322.7 ± 13.2 a	88.3 ± 12.8 d
M29	香叶酸 Geranic acid	14.2 ± 1.0 cd	30.9 ± 2.5 cd	30.2 ± 4.0 cd	9.7 ± 3.2 d	23.9 ± 3.0 cd	34.3 ± 6.1 c	64.6 ± 9.0 b	90.2 ± 5.1 a	17.9 ± 5.0 cd
合计 Total		9 661.6 ± 214.7 c	10 531.3 ± 235.5 b	9614.1 ± 401.3 c	6 741.7 ± 832.7 d	9 367.0 ± 415.2 c	11 108.9 ± 640.6 ab	1 2481.4 ± 1 092.7 ab	13 081.4 ± 309.5 a	10 484.5 ± 369.8 bc

编号 Number	化合物 Compound	T1	T2	T3	T4	T5	T6	T7	T8	T9
M1	β-月桂烯 β-Myrcene	33.3 ± 6.4 a	36.4 ± 1.2 a	37.9 ± 6.8 a	40.7 ± 11.7 a	26.6 ± 1.0 a	28.3 ± 0.3 a	21.8 ± 0.2 a	23.1 ± 2.1 a	33.5 ± 1.5 a
M2	柠檬烯 Limonene	19.7 ± 0.3 bc	26.0 ± 1.5 a	20.6 ± 0.4 b	22.4 ± 0.9 ab	18.0 ± 0.6 c	20.4 ± 0.2 bc	20.2 ± 0.6 bc	17.3 ± 2.1 d	23.9 ± 1.2 ab
M3	水芹烯 Phellandrene	18.6 ± 0.5 c	23.2 ± 0.4 a	20.8 ± 0.1 b	21.2 ± 0.8 b	19.7 ± 0.6 bc	20.7 ± 0.2 b	18.4 ± 0.4 c	17.5 ± 0.7 c	21.6 ± 0.7 ab
M4	β-反式-罗勒烯 β-trans-Ocimene	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M5	γ-松油烯 γ-Terpinen	7.2 ± 0.0 c	7.6 ± 0.1 a	7.2 ± 0.1 bc	7.3 ± 0.1 b	7.1 ± 0.0 c	7.3 ± 0.0 bc	7.2 ± 0.1 bc	7.1 ± 0.1 c	7.6 ± 0.1 ab
M6	β-顺式-罗勒烯 β-cis-Ocimene	61.7 ± 2.9 cd	92.4 ± 5.0 a	75.3 ± 2.8 ab	78.6 ± 5.3 ab	63.0 ± 3.5 c	72.6 ± 1.7 b	59.7 ± 2.4 cd	52.8 ± 6.7 d	84.1 ± 6.3 ab
M7	异松油烯 Terpinolen	95.9 ± 0.5 ab	103.6 ± 4.2 ab	90.5 ± 1.2 bc	98.6 ± 0.5 ab	86.5 ± 1.2 c	92.8 ± 0.8 bc	101.3 ± 2.0 ab	93.3 ± 6.0 b	106.6 ± 3.7 a
M8	顺式-氧化玫瑰 cis-Rose oxide	10.8 ± 0.0 ab	10.9 ± 0.1 a	10.8 ± 0.0 ab	10.9 ± 0.1 a	10.8 ± 0.0 ab	10.9 ± 0.0 ab	10.8 ± 0.0 ab	10.7 ± 0.0 b	10.8 ± 0.0 ab
M9	反式-氧化玫瑰 trans-Rose oxide	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M10	别罗勒烯 Allo-ocimene	19.9 ± 0.5 cd	26.1 ± 1.1 a	22.4 ± 0.5 b	23.1 ± 0.9 ab	19.9 ± 0.7 cd	22.0 ± 0.3 bc	19.9 ± 0.5 c	18.3 ± 1.4 d	24.6 ± 1.1 ab
M11	(E,Z) -别罗勒烯 (E,Z)-Allo-Ocimene	11.3 ± 0.2 c	12.5 ± 0.2 a	11.8 ± 0.1 ab	11.9 ± 0.2 ab	11.3 ± 0.1 b	11.7 ± 0.1 ab	11.1 ± 0.1 cd	10.8 ± 0.2 d	12.1 ± 0.3 ab
M12	cis-呋喃型氧化里那醇cis-Furan linalool oxide	161.2 ± 12.0 b	210.4 ± 8.2 b	193.9 ± 6.5 b	159.4 ± 9.1 b	190.1 ± 7.7 b	273.3 ± 5.4 a	199.5 ± 15.3 b	180.6 ± 26.1 b	167.0 ± 14.7 b
M13	trans-呋喃型氧化里那醇trans-Furan linalool oxide	73.1 ± 3.4 b	105.9 ± 5.6 ab	110.3 ± 2.8 a	110.6 ± 6.4 a	97.8 ± 6.1 ab	123.8 ± 4.3 a	104.6 ± 7.8 ab	91.2 ± 15.3 ab	89.4 ± 8.8 ab
M14	橙花醚 Nerol oxide	19.0 ± 0.3 ab	22.6 ± 1.2 a	18.1 ± 0.2 b	19.9 ± 0.2 ab	17.2 ± 0.2 c	19.9 ± 0.6 ab	22.1 ± 0.4 ab	20.6 ± 2.0 ab	21.7 ± 0.9 ab
M15	香茅醇 Citronellal	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M16	里那醇 Linalool	3 712.0 ± 265.6 b	5 431.7 ± 46.9 a	4 914.3 ± 224.7 a	4 456.5 ± 308.8 ab	4 435.4 ± 340.8 ab	4 616.8 ± 172.7 ab	3 213.5 ± 239.3 c	2 958.8 ± 195.7 c	5 319.7 ± 306.5 a
M17	脱氢里那醇 Hortrineol	55.6 ± 2.9 b	68.8 ± 7.2 ab	49.3 ± 1.5 b	54.3 ± 1.2 b	48.4 ± 1.2 b	67.9 ± 3.3 ab	100.2 ± 6.2 a	77.0 ± 22.6 ab	94.9 ± 7.8 a
M18	4-松油醇 4-Terpineol	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M19	橙花醛 Neral	11.9 ± 0.1 c	11.2 ± 0.3 c	12.7 ± 0.2 b	10.9 ± 0.3 c	12.5 ± 0.5 bc	14.8 ± 0.2 ab	16.6 ± 1.7 a	17.4 ± 1.2 a	ND
M20	α-松油醇 α-Terpineol	36.8 ± 1.5 ab	45.0 ± 5.0 ab	28.7 ± 1.7 b	38.7 ± 0.4 ab	25.1 ± 1.6 c	35.0 ± 1.8 ab	49.7 ± 1.4 a	37.9 ± 9.6 ab	47.8 ± 5.6 ab
M21	香叶醛 Geranial	26.1 ± 1.4 ab	17.4 ± 2.9 bc	22.4 ± 1.3 bc	15.1 ± 0.8 c	21.3 ± 1.7 bc	22.7 ± 1.7 b	26.3 ± 4.1 ab	34.0 ± 2.9 a	8.8 ± 0.0 d
M22	β-香茅醇 β-Citronellol	13.8 ± 0.2 ab	13.4 ± 0.1 c	13.6 ± 0.1 b	13.4 ± 0.1 c	13.6 ± 0.2 bc	14.3 ± 0.2 a	14.1 ± 0.2 ab	14.3 ± 0.1 a	12.9 ± 0.0 d
M23	γ-香叶醇 γ-Geraniol	23.5 ± 0.0 c	23.6 ± 0.0 c	23.8 ± 0.1 bc	23.8 ± 0.1 b	24.1 ± 0.1 ab	24.3 ± 0.1 a	24.1 ± 0.2 ab	24.3 ± 0.1 a	23.1 ± 0.0 d
M24	橙花醇 Nerol	32.8 ± 0.9 b	36.6 ± 2.0 ab	34.5 ± 0.5 b	38.0 ± 1.5 ab	36.6 ± 1.6 ab	42.6 ± 1.3 a	44.2 ± 2.8 a	43.2 ± 2.7 a	27.3 ± 1.2 c
M25	顺式-异香叶醇 cis-Isogeraniol	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M26	反式-异香叶醇 trans-Isogeraniol	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M27	β-大马烯酮 Damascenone	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
M28	香叶醇 Geraniol	196.6 ± 10.0 b	185.8 ± 9.6 bc	171.0 ± 3.8 c	173.6 ± 4.9 c	190.1 ± 10.3 bc	208.9 ± 6.4 ab	210.7 ± 10.7 ab	233.6 ± 3.8 a	109.9 ± 2.9 d
M29	香叶酸 Geranic acid	544.8 ± 0.8 b	546.0 ± 1.8 b	541.5 ± 0.4 b	549.0 ± 1.5 b	548.7 ± 2.6 b	555.5 ± 2.0 b	589.1 ± 25.4 a	560.3 ± 6.7 b	ND
合计 Total		5 185.4 ± 282.1 b	7 057.2 ± 76.8 a	6 431.4 ± 240.6 ab	5 978.0 ± 349.2 ab	5 924.1 ± 367.2 ab	6 306.3 ± 172.8 ab	4 885.3 ± 281.0 c	4 544.1 ± 292.8 d	6 247.2 ± 358.1 ab

编号Code	化合物 Compound	阈值/（µg ∙ L^-1） Olfactory threshold	处理Treatment	OAV		香气描述 Aroma description
编号Code	化合物 Compound	阈值/（µg ∙ L^-1） Olfactory threshold	处理Treatment	2023	2024	香气描述 Aroma description
M1	β-月桂烯 β-Myrcene	36	T1	6.41	0.93	果香 Fruity flavor
			T2	6.95	1.01
			T3	6.77	1.05
			T4	4.38	1.13
			T5	5.58	0.74
			T6	7.46	0.79
			T7	9.21	0.61
			T8	9.74	0.64
			T9	6.16	0.93
M2	柠檬烯 Limonene	10	T1	3.27	1.97	花香、青草、柑橘
			T2	3.59	2.60	Floral，grassy and citrus flavor
			T3	3.96	2.06
			T4	2.34	2.24
			T5	3.02	1.80
			T6	3.83	2.04
			T7	5.11	2.02
			T8	5.38	1.73
			T9	2.81	2.39
M3	水芹烯 Phellandrene	40	T1	0.76	0.47	甜香、玫瑰香
			T2	0.82	0.58	Sweet and rose flavor
			T3	0.82	0.52
			T4	0.61	0.53
			T5	0.70	0.49
			T6	0.86	0.52
			T7	1.03	0.46
			T8	1.08	0.44
			T9	0.72	0.54
M4	β-反式-罗勒烯	34	T1	3.16	\	草本 Herbal
	β-trans-Ocimene		T2	3.37	\
			T3	3.47	\
			T4	1.98	\
			T5	2.94	\
			T6	3.73	\
			T7	4.95	\
			T8	5.03	\
			T9	2.65	\
M6	β-顺式-罗勒烯	34	T1	4.59	1.81	草本、花香 Herbal，floral
	β-cis-Ocimene		T2	5.10	2.72
			T3	5.47	2.21
			T4	2.92	2.31
			T5	4.36	1.85
			T6	5.53	2.14
			T7	6.76	1.76
			T8	7.70	1.55
			T9	3.95	2.47
M8	顺式-氧化玫瑰	0.5	T1	22.00	21.60	玫瑰香 Rose flavor
	cis-Rose oxide		T2	22.40	21.80
			T3	22.00	21.60
			T4	21.40	21.80
			T5	22.40	21.60
			T6	22.60	21.80
			T7	23.60	21.60
			T8	23.40	21.40
			T9	22.20	21.60
M9	反式-氧化玫瑰	0.5	T1	\	\	玫瑰香 Rose flavor
	trans-Rose oxide		T2	\	\
			T3	3.00	\
			T4	\	\
			T5	\	\
			T6	\	\
			T7	3.80	\
			T8	\	\
			T9	\	\
M12	cis-呋喃型氧化里那醇	6	T1	48.65	26.87	花香 Floral
	cis-Furan linalool oxide		T2	98.50	35.07
			T3	63.78	32.32
			T4	31.72	26.57
			T5	51.4	31.68
			T6	105.7	45.55
			T7	94.58	33.25
			T8	113.03	30.10
			T9	46.88	27.83
M13	trans-呋喃型氧化里那醇	6	T1	33.48	12.18	柑橘、青香 Citrus，green
	trans-Furan linalool oxide		T2	37.23	17.65
			T3	40.18	18.38
			T4	19.47	18.43
			T5	31.6	16.30
			T6	45.93	20.63
			T7	51.13	17.43
			T8	54.73	15.20
			T9	25.83	14.90
M16	里那醇 Linalool	6	T1	1 323.22	618.67	花香、熏衣草、柑橘、杨梅
			T2	1 366.42	905.28	Floral，lavender，citrus and
			T3	1 218.60	819.05	bayberry flavor
			T4	942.40	742.75
			T5	1 277.28	739.23
			T6	1 435.10	769.47
M16	里那醇 Linalool	6	T7	1 570.68	535.58
			T8	1 575.32	493.13
			T9	1 502.70	886.62
M17	脱氢里那醇 Hortrineol	110	T1	1.97	0.51	花香、果香
			T2	2.79	0.63	Floral and fruity flavor
			T3	3.10	0.45
			T4	1.15	0.49
			T5	1.76	0.44
			T6	2.70	0.62
			T7	3.87	0.91
			T8	5.29	0.70
			T9	1.36	0.86
M18	4-松油醇 4-Terpineol	130	T1	0.56	\	\
			T2	0.87	\
			T3	0.99	\
			T4	0.25	\
			T5	0.48	\
			T6	0.84	\
			T7	1.27	\
			T8	1.8	\
			T9	0.33	\
M27	β-大马烯酮	2.1	T1	\	\	甜的木香、果香、花香、青香
	Damascenone		T2	5.05	\	Sweet woody，fruity，floral，green
			T3	8.1	\
			T4	\	\
			T5	\	\
			T6	4.57	\
			T7	6.38	\
			T8	7.9	\
			T9	\	\
M28	香叶醇 Geraniol	40	T1	2.12	4.92	玫瑰香、天竺葵、桃子、柠檬
			T2	3.37	4.65	Rose，geranium，peach and lemon
			T3	4.11	4.28	flavor
			T4	1.04	4.34
			T5	3.35	4.75
			T6	4.1	5.22
			T7	6.21	5.27
			T8	8.07	5.84
			T9	2.21	2.75
M29	香叶酸 Geranic acid	40	T1	0.36	13.62	青香 Green flavor
			T2	0.77	13.65
			T3	0.76	13.54
			T4	0.24	13.73
			T5	0.60	13.72
			T6	0.86	13.89
			T7	1.62	14.73
			T8	2.26	14.01
			T9	0.45	\

评价指标 Evaluation indexes	2023			2024
评价指标 Evaluation indexes	PC1	PC2	PC3	PC1	PC2	PC3
果穗质量 Cluster weight	0.431	0.072	-0.045	0.434	0.287	0.155
单粒质量 Single berry weight	0.410	-0.023	-0.110	0.293	0.445	-0.398
可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids	0.189	0.806	-0.233	0.285	-0.446	-0.458
可滴定酸 Titratable acidity	0.226	-0.420	-0.679	-0.133	0.558	0.078
叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content	0.373	-0.392	0.229	0.459	0.063	0.128
净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate	-0.332	-0.104	0.363	0.392	0.022	0.606
顺式-氧化玫瑰 cis-Rose oxide	0.407	0.058	0.368	-0.420	-0.091	0.409
香叶醇 Geraniol	0.380	0.024	0.388	0.293	-0.443	0.225
特征值 Eigenvalue	4.834	1.114	1.028	3.267	2.202	0.949
方差贡献率/% Variance contribution rate	60.430	13.930	12.850	40.840	27.530	11.870
累计方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance contribution rate	60.430	74.360	87.210	40.840	68.370	80.240

处理 Treatment	主成分得分 Principal component score			综合得分 Composite score	排序 Rank
处理 Treatment	F1	F2	F3	综合得分 Composite score	排序 Rank
T1	-0.089	0.401	-0.807	-0.1018	4
T2	-0.766	-0.478	0.716	-0.4377	7
T3	-0.340	-1.136	-0.577	-0.4380	8
T4	-1.618	1.673	-0.216	-0.7724	9
T5	-0.525	-0.052	0.960	-0.2012	6
T6	0.097	-1.236	1.241	0.0459	3
T7	1.404	1.014	0.171	1.0115	2
T8	1.522	0.595	0.452	1.0606	1
T9	0.316	-0.781	-1.940	-0.1669	5

[1]	奚晓军, 蒋爱丽, 查倩, 殷向静, 孙鹏鹏. 玫瑰香型葡萄新品种‘申歆’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 47-48.
[2]	卓思婷, 梁鑫, 沈兴仪, 黄雪, 刘军伟, 赵恃立, 何华平, 李国怀, 朱炜, 朱凯杰. 4个桃砧木种质对流胶病菌的抗性评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(7): 2004-2018.
[3]	鄢云, 肖阳, 姚雅淇, 侬玉英, 郭得君, 邵建辉, 马春花, 苏静. 葡萄VvSWEET蛋白家族的全基因组鉴定及VvSWEET15在糖含量积累的功能研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(7): 2019-2033.
[4]	谭延肖, 韩双, 冷凇凝, 陈晓乐, 刘佰霖, 史红梅, 何维华, 张煜. 葡萄DGK基因家族鉴定及VvDGK1在盐胁迫下的功能研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(7): 2034-2052.
[5]	骆张吉, 李好健, 李连震, 侯香婷, 董文, 孙平, 薛晓敏, 由春香, 张振鲁. 苹果花叶病对‘弘前富士’苹果叶片光合作用及果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(7): 2119-2128.
[6]	贾东峰, 林立婷, 叶斌, 黄春辉, 廖光联, 徐小彪. 花粉直感对‘东红’猕猴桃果实品质和花青苷组分的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(6): 1684-1694.
[7]	喻江涛, 叶夏林, 李浩祯, 康庆轩, 余心怡, 渠慎春. ‘苏砧1号’等砧木与‘太秋’甜柿的嫁接亲和性相关研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(6): 1709-1721.
[8]	刘琳, 赛小玲, 桑海洋, 卢如霞, 向本春, 郑银英. 新疆北疆葡萄病毒和类病毒组分析与分子鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(6): 1765-1778.
[9]	朱春梅, 陈耀, 刘志宇, 赵宝龙, 孙军利. 盐碱处理对16个葡萄品种叶片形态、生理及胁迫信号相关基因表达的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(3): 653-670.
[10]	陈曦, 温雪, 张雅楠, 王勇, 李玉玲, 孙峰, 赵艳卓, 牛早柱, 徐炎, 刘国甜. 多倍体葡萄胚挽救育种效率关键因素探究[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(3): 671-682.
[11]	陈艳燕, 乐晨曦, 涂慧, 师冀康, 陶俊杰, 潘慧, 李文艺, 李黎, 黄春辉. ‘金奉’猕猴桃实生种质溃疡病、软腐病抗性及果实品质评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(3): 763-774.
[12]	包敏, 田亚平, 李凡, 魏茜茜, 刘苗苗, HASSAN Jawad, 李智, 赵一洁, 高敏, 王西平. GA₃诱导葡萄无核形成的胚胎学及生理生化研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(1): 65-81.
[13]	耿浩, 葛孟清, 丁云龙, 徐卫东, 丛春磊, 严红卫, 钱钰, 刘玉风. 中熟鲜食葡萄新品种‘园金香’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 31-32.
[14]	高敏, 赵宁, 李智, 王现行, 涂明星, 郭俊强, 王西平. 鲜食葡萄新品种‘秦葡3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 33-34.
[15]	魏茜茜, 赵宁, 李智, 王现行, 涂明星, 高敏, 王西平. 鲜食葡萄新品种‘秦葡4号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 35-36.

处理 Treatment	主成分得分 Principal component score			综合得分 Composite score	排序 Rank
处理 Treatment	F1	F2	F3	综合得分 Composite score	排序 Rank
T1	1.349	1.094	1.858	1.073	1
T2	-1.214	-0.857	0.763	-0.641	9
T3	-0.514	0.936	-0.307	0.011	4
T4	-1.415	-0.193	0.672	-0.551	8
T5	0.421	-1.257	-0.421	-0.224	7
T6	-0.029	-0.405	0.288	-0.089	6
T7	0.406	-0.258	-1.256	-0.054	5
T8	1.393	-0.736	-0.404	0.318	2
T9	-0.395	1.675	-1.192	0.158	3

处理 Treatment	主成分得分 Principal component score			综合得分 Composite score	排序 Rank
处理 Treatment	F1	F2	F3	综合得分 Composite score	排序 Rank
T1	1.349	1.094	1.858	1.073	1
T2	-1.214	-0.857	0.763	-0.641	9
T3	-0.514	0.936	-0.307	0.011	4
T4	-1.415	-0.193	0.672	-0.551	8
T5	0.421	-1.257	-0.421	-0.224	7
T6	-0.029	-0.405	0.288	-0.089	6
T7	0.406	-0.258	-1.256	-0.054	5
T8	1.393	-0.736	-0.404	0.318	2
T9	-0.395	1.675	-1.192	0.158	3

不同水分调亏处理对‘瑞都科美’葡萄生长特性和果实品质的影响

Effects of Different Regulated Deficit Irrigation Treatments on Growth and Fruit Quality of‘Ruidu Kemei’Grape

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 95

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数: 当日访问总数: 当前在线人数:

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数: