园艺学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 117-128.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0834
收稿日期:
2021-05-13
修回日期:
2021-09-10
出版日期:
2022-01-25
发布日期:
2022-01-24
通讯作者:
代红军
E-mail:dai_hj@nxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
HE Yan, SUN Yanli, ZHAO Fangfang, DAI Hongjun()
Received:
2021-05-13
Revised:
2021-09-10
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-01-24
Contact:
DAI Hongjun
E-mail:dai_hj@nxu.edu.cn
摘要:
以酿酒葡萄‘美乐’为试材,于花后8周对其果实喷施不同浓度(0.2、0.4、0.6 mg · L-1)油菜素内酯(2,4-表油菜素内酯,EBR)溶液,以喷施等量蒸馏水为对照,研究 EBR对果实成熟过程中糖组分、糖代谢关键酶及相关基因表达的影响。0.6 mg · L-1 EBR处理促进了果实发育过程中葡萄糖和果糖的积累,花后104 d分别较对照提高了16.95%和39.31%,果实成熟期酸性转化酶(AI)和蔗糖磷酸合成酶(SPS)活性均显著高于对照,果实转色至成熟过程中显著上调了细胞壁酸性转化酶基因(VvcwINV)、蔗糖转运蛋白基因(VvSUC12)、蔗糖合成酶基因(VvSS)的转录水平,花后67 d VvSS的表达量是对照的2.75倍。相关性分析表明,0.6 mg · L-1 EBR处理下果实中己糖含量与SS、AI活性呈显著正相关。0.6 mg · L-1 EBR处理提高了果实SS和AI的活性、促进了VvSS、VvcwINV以及VvSUC12的表达,从而增加了葡萄糖和果糖的含量。0.6 mg · L-1 EBR处理效果最好。
中图分类号:
贺琰, 孙艳丽, 赵芳芳, 代红军. 外源油菜素内酯处理对‘美乐’葡萄果实糖代谢的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(1): 117-128.
HE Yan, SUN Yanli, ZHAO Fangfang, DAI Hongjun. Effect of Exogenous Brassinolides Treatment on Sugar Metabolism of Merlot Grape Berries[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(1): 117-128.
基因名称 Gene name | 序列号 | 引物序列Primer sequence(5'-3') | |
---|---|---|---|
Accession No. | 正向 Forward | 反向 Reverse | |
SS | BG273882. 1 | CCAGCCAACGTCATTAGCCT | CCATGACTTGTGGCCTTCCT |
SPS | BG273723. 1 | TAGCCCTTGAGGACCCCTAC | CCATGCAAACCGAACCTACCC |
VvcwINV | AY538262 | ATGAATCATCTAGYGTGGAGCAC | CTTAAACGATATCTCCACATCTG |
VVSUC12 | AF021809 | CTTCATCCATTCCTCATCCA | GCGGCAATCATACAACTG |
HT1 | AJ 001061 | GTCTATGTTTCAGGGTTTG | AAGAAGATTTGGGCTATG |
EF | AF176496 | GTTAAGATGATTCCAACCAAGCCC | TCTCCACGCTCTTGATGACTC |
Actin | BN000705 | CTTGCATCCCTCAGCACCTT | TCCTGTGGACAATGGATGGA |
表1 试验所用引物
Table 1 Primers used in the study
基因名称 Gene name | 序列号 | 引物序列Primer sequence(5'-3') | |
---|---|---|---|
Accession No. | 正向 Forward | 反向 Reverse | |
SS | BG273882. 1 | CCAGCCAACGTCATTAGCCT | CCATGACTTGTGGCCTTCCT |
SPS | BG273723. 1 | TAGCCCTTGAGGACCCCTAC | CCATGCAAACCGAACCTACCC |
VvcwINV | AY538262 | ATGAATCATCTAGYGTGGAGCAC | CTTAAACGATATCTCCACATCTG |
VVSUC12 | AF021809 | CTTCATCCATTCCTCATCCA | GCGGCAATCATACAACTG |
HT1 | AJ 001061 | GTCTATGTTTCAGGGTTTG | AAGAAGATTTGGGCTATG |
EF | AF176496 | GTTAAGATGATTCCAACCAAGCCC | TCTCCACGCTCTTGATGACTC |
Actin | BN000705 | CTTGCATCCCTCAGCACCTT | TCCTGTGGACAATGGATGGA |
图1 EBR处理对葡萄果实中葡萄糖(A)、果糖(B)、蔗糖(C)和可溶性总糖(D)含量的影响 不同小写字母表示相同时期处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Fig. 1 Effect of EBR treatments on glucose(A),fructose(B),sucrose(C)and total soluble sugar(D) contents in grape berries Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments in the same period(P < 0.05).
图2 不同浓度EBR处理对葡萄果实蔗糖代谢酶活性的影响 数值表示为平均值 ± 标准误(SD);同列小写字母表示在0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 2 The effect of different concentration of EBR on sucrose metabolism enzyme activity in grape berries. The value expressed as mean ± standard error(SD);Lowercase letters indicates the difference in the level of P < 0.05 in the same column.
酶 Enzyme | EBR/(mg · L-1) | 相关系数Correlation coefficient | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
蔗糖 Sucrose | 葡萄糖 Glucose | 果糖 Fructose | 可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugar | ||
SS | 0(对照 Control) | 0.279 | 0.798 | 0.833* | 0.824* |
0.2 | 0.736 | 0.357 | 0.399 | 0.467 | |
0.4 | 0.766 | 0.504 | 0.468 | 0.460 | |
0.6 | 0.353 | 0.893* | 0.937** | 0.440 | |
NI | 0(对照 Control) | 0.391 | 0.207 | 0.535 | 0.389 |
0.2 | 0.363 | 0.196 | 0.276 | 0.246 | |
0.4 | 0.464 | 0.346 | 0.321 | 0.338 | |
0.6 | 0.569 | 0.244 | 0.283 | 0.409 | |
SPS | 0(对照 Control) | 0.884* | 0.707 | 0.738 | 0.745 |
0.2 | 0.853* | 0.472 | 0.505 | 0.534 | |
0.4 | 0.921** | 0.536 | 0.490 | 0.833* | |
0.6 | 0.962** | 0.562 | 0.640 | 0.860* | |
AI | 0(对照 Control) | 0.640 | 0.458 | 0.469 | 0.676 |
0.2 | 0.313 | 0.722 | 0.755 | 0.809 | |
0.4 | 0.545 | 0.815* | 0.825* | 0.827* | |
0.6 | 0.448 | 0.937** | 0.888* | 0.785 |
表2 葡萄果实糖组分与蔗糖代谢相关酶活性的相关性分析
Table 2 Correlation between sugar components and enzymes activity related to sucrose metabolism in grape berries
酶 Enzyme | EBR/(mg · L-1) | 相关系数Correlation coefficient | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
蔗糖 Sucrose | 葡萄糖 Glucose | 果糖 Fructose | 可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugar | ||
SS | 0(对照 Control) | 0.279 | 0.798 | 0.833* | 0.824* |
0.2 | 0.736 | 0.357 | 0.399 | 0.467 | |
0.4 | 0.766 | 0.504 | 0.468 | 0.460 | |
0.6 | 0.353 | 0.893* | 0.937** | 0.440 | |
NI | 0(对照 Control) | 0.391 | 0.207 | 0.535 | 0.389 |
0.2 | 0.363 | 0.196 | 0.276 | 0.246 | |
0.4 | 0.464 | 0.346 | 0.321 | 0.338 | |
0.6 | 0.569 | 0.244 | 0.283 | 0.409 | |
SPS | 0(对照 Control) | 0.884* | 0.707 | 0.738 | 0.745 |
0.2 | 0.853* | 0.472 | 0.505 | 0.534 | |
0.4 | 0.921** | 0.536 | 0.490 | 0.833* | |
0.6 | 0.962** | 0.562 | 0.640 | 0.860* | |
AI | 0(对照 Control) | 0.640 | 0.458 | 0.469 | 0.676 |
0.2 | 0.313 | 0.722 | 0.755 | 0.809 | |
0.4 | 0.545 | 0.815* | 0.825* | 0.827* | |
0.6 | 0.448 | 0.937** | 0.888* | 0.785 |
图3 不同浓度EBR处理对葡萄果实蔗糖代谢相关基因相对表达量的影响 不同小写字母表示显著差异(P < 0.05)。
Fig. 3 The effect of different concentration of EBR on the relative transcript levels of sucrose metabolism in grape berries Different lowercase mean significant differences at 0.05 level.
酶 Enzyme | EBR/(mg · L-1) | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VvSS | VvSPS | VvcwINV | VvSUC12 | VvHT1 | ||
SS | 0 | 0.929** | 0.458 | -0.076 | 0.490 | -0.799 |
0.2 | 0.680 | 0.274 | -0.367 | -0.109 | -0.583 | |
0.4 | 0.553 | 0.395 | 0.416 | 0.542 | 0.153 | |
0.6 | 0.734 | 0.633 | 0.327 | 0.751 | -0.103 | |
NI | 0 | 0.731 | -0.122 | -0.201 | 0.128 | -0.599 |
0.2 | 0.830* | 0.251 | 0.191 | -0.417 | -0.518 | |
0.4 | 0.532 | 0.258 | 0.365 | 0.590 | 0.276 | |
0.6 | 0.420 | 0.454 | 0.746 | 0.504 | -0.186 | |
SPS | 0 | 0.784 | 0.139 | 0.235 | 0.633 | -0.401 |
0.2 | 0.473 | -0.020 | -0.209 | 0.354 | -0.550 | |
0.4 | 0.268 | -0.211 | 0.060 | 0.229 | -0.321 | |
0.6 | 0.132 | -0.010 | 0.011 | 0.189 | -0.647 | |
AI | 0 | 0.767 | 0.061 | 0.225 | 0.800 | -0.393 |
0.2 | 0.477 | -0.056 | 0.135 | -0.278 | -0.832* | |
0.4 | 0.568 | -0.288 | -0.465 | 0.266 | -0.169 | |
0.6 | 0.421 | 0.250 | 0.182 | 0.361 | -0.447 |
表3 蔗糖代谢相关酶活性与蔗糖代谢相关基因相对表达量的相关性
Table 3 Correlation between relative transcript levels and enzymes activity related to sucrose metabolism in grape berries
酶 Enzyme | EBR/(mg · L-1) | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VvSS | VvSPS | VvcwINV | VvSUC12 | VvHT1 | ||
SS | 0 | 0.929** | 0.458 | -0.076 | 0.490 | -0.799 |
0.2 | 0.680 | 0.274 | -0.367 | -0.109 | -0.583 | |
0.4 | 0.553 | 0.395 | 0.416 | 0.542 | 0.153 | |
0.6 | 0.734 | 0.633 | 0.327 | 0.751 | -0.103 | |
NI | 0 | 0.731 | -0.122 | -0.201 | 0.128 | -0.599 |
0.2 | 0.830* | 0.251 | 0.191 | -0.417 | -0.518 | |
0.4 | 0.532 | 0.258 | 0.365 | 0.590 | 0.276 | |
0.6 | 0.420 | 0.454 | 0.746 | 0.504 | -0.186 | |
SPS | 0 | 0.784 | 0.139 | 0.235 | 0.633 | -0.401 |
0.2 | 0.473 | -0.020 | -0.209 | 0.354 | -0.550 | |
0.4 | 0.268 | -0.211 | 0.060 | 0.229 | -0.321 | |
0.6 | 0.132 | -0.010 | 0.011 | 0.189 | -0.647 | |
AI | 0 | 0.767 | 0.061 | 0.225 | 0.800 | -0.393 |
0.2 | 0.477 | -0.056 | 0.135 | -0.278 | -0.832* | |
0.4 | 0.568 | -0.288 | -0.465 | 0.266 | -0.169 | |
0.6 | 0.421 | 0.250 | 0.182 | 0.361 | -0.447 |
[1] | Agasse A, Vignault C, Kappel C, Conde C, Gerós H, Delrot S. 2009. Sugar transport & sugar sensing in grape//Grapevine Molecular Physiology & Biotechnology. Dordrecht:Springer:105-139. |
[2] |
Angeles-Núnez, Juan Gabriel, Axel Tiessen. 2010. Arabidopsis sucrose synthase 2 and 3 modulate metabolic homeostasis and direct carbon towards starch synthesis in developing seeds. Planta, 232 (3):701-718.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1207-9 pmid: 20559653 |
[3] |
Atanassova R, Leterrier M, Gaillard C, Agasse A, Sagot E, Thévenot P C, Delrot S. 2003. Sugar-regulated expression of a putative hexose transport gene in grape. Plant Physiology, 131 (1):326-334.
pmid: 12529540 |
[4] |
Botha F C, Black K G. 2000. Sucrose phosphate synthase and sucrose synthase activity during maturation of internodal tissue in sugarcane. Functional Plant Biology, 27 (1):81-85.
doi: 10.1071/PP99098 URL |
[5] |
Clouse S D. 2011. Brassinosteroid signal transduction:from receptor kinase activation to transcriptional networks regulating plant development. Plant Cell, 23 (4):1219-1230.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084475 URL |
[6] |
Chen Jun-wei, Zhang Shang-long, Zhang Liang-cheng. 2004. Sugar transport,metabolism,accumulation and their regulation in fruits. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 30 (1):1-10. (in Chinese)
pmid: 15583402 |
陈俊伟, 张上隆, 张良诚. 2004. 果实中糖的运输、代谢与积累及其调控. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 30 (1):1-10.
pmid: 15583402 |
|
[7] | Chen Yan-hua, Wang Ya-liang, Zhu De-feng, Shi Qing-hua, Chen Hui-zhe, Xiang Jing, Zhang Yi-kai, Zhang Yu-ping. 2019. Mechanism of exogenous Brassinolide in alleviating high temperature injury at panicle initiation stage in rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 33 (5):457-466. (in Chinese) |
陈燕华, 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 石庆华, 陈惠哲, 向镜, 张义凯, 张玉屏. 2019. 外源油菜素内酯缓解水稻穗分化期高温伤害的机理研究. 中国水稻科学, 33 (5):457-466. | |
[8] |
Conde C, Agasse A, Glissant D, Tavares R, Hernani G, Serge D. 2006. Pathways of glucose regulation of monosaccharide transport in grape cells. Plant Physiology, 141 (4):1563-1577.
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.080804 URL |
[9] |
Davies C, Robinson S P. 1996. Sugar accumulation in grape berries. Cloning of two putative vacuolar invertase cDNAs and their expression in grapevine tissues. Plant Physiology, 111:275-283.
pmid: 8685267 |
[10] | Fu Feng-qing. 2008. Moleeular meehanism for the regulation of fruit development in Cueumis sativus[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University. (in Chinese) |
傅丰庆. 2008. 黄瓜果实发育调控的分子机理研究[博士论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学. | |
[11] | Gao Jian, Wang Ya-liang, Sun Lei, Zhao Yuan, Liu Lian-meng, Hou Yu-xuan, Wang Ling, Huang Shi-wen. 2019. Physiological mechanism of Brassinolide on alleviating high temperature stress of rice at flowering stage. China Rice, 25 (3):70-74. (in Chinese) |
高健, 王亚梁, 孙磊, 赵渊, 刘连盟, 侯雨萱, 王玲, 黄世文. 2019. 2,4-表油菜素内酯缓解水稻花期高温胁迫的生理机制. 中国稻米, 25 (3):70-74. | |
[12] | Gao Jun-feng. 2006. Plant physiology experiment guide. Beijing: Higher Education Press. (in Chinese) |
高俊凤. 2006. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社. | |
[13] |
Hayes M A, Christopher D, Dry I B. 2007. Isolation,functional characterization,and expression analysis of grapevine(Vitis vinifera L.)hexose transporters:differential roles in sink and source tissues. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58 (8):1985-1997.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm061 URL |
[14] | Hu Rui-fang, Jiang Hui, Li Yue-ying. 2012. Research advance on sucrose synthesize enzymes. Northern Horticulture,(1):167-170. (in Chinese) |
胡瑞芳, 姜慧, 李玥莹. 2012. 蔗糖代谢相关酶的研究进展. 北方园艺,(1):167-170. | |
[15] |
Kambiranda, Vasanthaiah H, Basha S M. 2011. Relationship between acid invertase activity and sugar content in grape species. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 35 (6):1646-1652.
doi: 10.1111/jfbc.2011.35.issue-6 URL |
[16] | Kang Yun-yan, Yang Xian, Guo Shi-rong, Zhang Ying-ying. 2011. Effects of 2,4-epibrassinolide on carbohydrate metabolism and enhancement of tolerance to root-zone hypoxia in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44 (12):2495-2503. (in Chinese) |
康云艳, 杨暹, 郭世荣, 张营营. 2011. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对低氧胁迫下黄瓜幼苗碳水化合物代谢的影响. 中国农业科学, 44 (12):2495-2503. | |
[17] | Kou Jiang-tao. 2019. Effects of 2,4-epibrassinolide on germination and physiological characteristics of Avena sativa L. seeds under NaCl Stress. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 27 (6):1562-1568. (in Chinese) |
寇江涛. 2019. 外源2,4-表油菜素内酯对NaCl胁迫下燕麦种子萌发和生理的影响. 草地学报, 27 (6):1562-1568. | |
[18] |
Lemoine R. 2000. Sucrose transporters in plants:update on function and structure. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Biomembranes, 1465 (1-2):246-262.
doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00142-5 URL |
[19] | Leng Xiang-peng, Zhang Yan-pi, Zhang Chun-hua, Song Chang-nian, Liu hong, Fang Jing-gui. 2012. Analysis of some genes involved in the sugar metabolic pathway based on the grape EST database. Plant Physiology Journal, 48 (3):289-297. (in Chinese) |
冷翔鹏, 张演义, 张春华, 宋长年, 刘洪, 房经贵. 2012. 基于葡萄EST数据库糖代谢途径有关基因的分析. 植物生理学报, 48 (3):289-297. | |
[20] | Li Lan. 2019. Physio-biochemical and molecular mechanism of exogenous brassinosteroids in regulating growth of Brassica napus under copper and chromium stress[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University. (in Chinese) |
李兰. 2019. 油菜素内酯调控铜和铬胁迫下油菜生理生化与分子机制研究[博士论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学. | |
[21] | Li Li-mei, Wang Xiu-qin, Yang Pei-pei, Huang Wei-dong, Zhan Ji-cheng. 2011. Relationship between sugar accumulation and sugar metabolism related enzymes during Cabernet Sauvignon berries development. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine,(4):24-27. (in Chinese) |
李利梅, 王秀芹, 杨培培, 黄卫东, 战吉宬. 2011. 赤霞珠葡萄果实糖积累与糖代谢相关酶的关系. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒,(4):24-27. | |
[22] | Lu Ze-mian. 2018. Effects of 2,4-epibrassinolide on delaying postharvest senescence of kiwifruit[M. D. Dissertation]. Xi’an: Northwest University. (in Chinese) |
卢泽绵. 2018. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对采后猕猴桃衰老进程的影响[硕士论文]. 西安: 西北大学. | |
[23] | Lü Xuesi, Zhang Dong, Min Ruihan, Li Shi-qi, Li Zheng, Ren Ziming, Xia Yiping. 2020. Effects of exogenous sucrose on bulblet formation of lycoris sprengeri in vitro. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (8):1475-1489. (in Chinese) |
吕学思, 张栋, 闵芮涵, 李世琦, 李铮, 任梓铭, 夏宜平. 2020. 外源蔗糖对离体条件下换锦花小鳞茎发生的影响. 园艺学报, 47 (8):1475-1489. | |
[24] |
Nrholm M H H, Nour-Eldin H H, Brodersen P, Mundy J, Halkier B A. 2006. Expression of the Arabidopsis high-affinity hexose transporter STP 13 correlates with programmed cell death. Febs Letters, 580 (9):2381-2387.
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.064 URL |
[25] |
Partick J W. 1997. Phloem unloading:sieve element unloading and post-sieve element transport. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 48:191-222.
doi: 10.1146/arplant.1997.48.issue-1 URL |
[26] |
Sheen J, Zhou L, Jang J C. 1999. Sugars as signaling molecules. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2 (5):410-418.
pmid: 10508760 |
[27] | Schlüter U, Kpke D, Altmann T, Müssig C. 2010. Analysis of carbohydrate metabolism of CPD antisense plants and the brassinosteroid-deficient cbb1 mutant. Plant Cell & Environment, 25 (6):783-791. |
[28] |
Symons Gregory M, Christopher Davies, Yuri Shavrukov, Dry Ian B, Reid James B, Thomas Mark R. 2006. Grapes on steroids. Brassinosteroids are involved in grape berry ripening. Plant Physiology, 140 (1):150-158.
pmid: 16361521 |
[29] | Wang Ai-ling, Cai Jun-she, Bai Shi-jian, Zhao Rong-hua. 2019. Effects of brassinolide on fruit quality of flame seedless grape. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 47 (2):203-207. (in Chinese) |
王爱玲, 蔡军社, 白世践, 赵荣华. 2019. 油菜素内酯对火焰无核葡萄果实品质的影响. 山西农业科学, 47 (2):203-207. | |
[30] | Wang Xi-cheng, Wu Wei-min, Zhao Mi-zhen, Qian Ya-ming, Wang Zhuang-wei. 2015. Effect of NAA treatment on sugar acid content and related gene expression in grape berries. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 42 (3):425-434. (in Chinese) |
王西成, 吴伟民, 赵密珍, 钱亚明, 王壮伟. 2015. NAA对葡萄果实中糖酸含量及相关基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 42 (3):425-434. | |
[31] |
Wendler, Veith R, Dancer J, Stitt M, Komor E. 1991. Sucrose storage in cell suspension cultures of Saccharum sp.(sugarcane)is regulated by a cycle of synthesis and degradation. Planta, 183 (1):31-39.
doi: 10.1007/BF00197564 pmid: 24193530 |
[32] | Xia Guo-hai, Zhang Da-peng, Jia Wen-suo. 2000. Effects of IAA,GA and ABA on 14C-sucrose import and metabolism in grape berries. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 27 (1):6-10. (in Chinese) |
夏国海, 张大鹏, 贾文锁. 2000. IAA、GA和ABA对葡萄果实14C蔗糖输入与代谢的调控. 园艺学报, 27 (1):6-10. | |
[33] |
Xu F, Xi Z M, Zhang H, Zhang C J, Zhang Z W. 2015. Brassinosteroids are involved in controlling sugar unloading in vitis vinifera‘Cabernet Sauvignon’berries during véraison. Plant Physiol Biochem, 94:197-208.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.06.005 URL |
[34] | Yang Xiang, Yu Song-lin, Sun Hui-min, He Xiu-Feng, Sun Lin-lin, Zhao feng-yun. 2019. Effects of N fertilizer application on sucrose and starch metabolism in Vitis vinifera L. seedlings. Northern Horticulture,(14):53-59. (in Chinese) |
杨湘, 郁松林, 孙慧敏, 何秀峰, 孙琳琳, 赵丰云. 2019. 施氮量对葡萄幼苗叶片蔗糖和淀粉代谢的影响. 北方园艺,(14):53-59. | |
[35] | Zhang Li zhi, Zhang Xin, Zuo Xi ya, Xing Li bo, Fan Sheng, Li You mei, Zhao Caiping, Han Mingyu, Zhang Dong. 2019. Effects of exogenous glucose treatment on soluble sugar and expression of related genes during floral bud differentiation stage in terminal spur buds of ‘Nagafu 2’apple. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 46 (1):11-24. (in Chinese) |
张丽之, 张昕, 左希亚, 邢利博, 樊胜, 李有梅, 赵彩平, 韩明玉, 张东. 2019. 外源葡萄糖对‘长富2号’苹果花芽生理分化期可溶性糖和相关基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 46 (1):11-24. | |
[36] |
Zhu Y J, Albert H, Moore P H. 2000. Differential expression of soluble acid invertase genes in the shoots of high-sucrose and low-sucrose species of Saccharum and their hybrids. Functional Plant Biology, 27 (3):193-199.
doi: 10.1071/PP99142 URL |
[1] | 王晓晨, 聂子页, 刘先菊, 段 伟, 范培格, 梁振昌, . 脱落酸对‘京香玉’葡萄果实单萜物质合成的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 237-249. |
[2] | 翟含含, 翟宇杰, 田义, 张叶, 杨丽, 温陟良, 陈海江. 桃SAUR家族基因分析及PpSAUR5功能鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 1-14. |
[3] | 王宝亮, 刘凤之, 冀晓昊, 王孝娣, 史祥宾, 张艺灿, 李 鹏, 王海波. 早熟鲜食葡萄新品种‘华葡早玉’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 33-34. |
[4] | 王宝亮, 王海波, 冀晓昊, 王孝娣, 史祥宾, 王志强, 王小龙, 刘凤之. 中熟鲜食葡萄新品种‘华葡黄玉’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 35-36. |
[5] | 牛早柱, 赵艳卓, 陈 展, 宣立锋, 牛帅科, 魏建国, 褚凤杰, 杨丽丽. 晚熟无核葡萄新品种‘紫龙珠’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 37-38. |
[6] | 师校欣, 杜国强, 杨丽丽, 乔月莲, 黄成立, 王素月, 赵跃欣, 魏晓慧, 王 莉, 齐向丽. 晚熟无核葡萄新品种‘红峰无核’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 39-40. |
[7] | 吴月燕, 陈天池, 王立如, 韩善琪, 付 涛. 鲜食葡萄新品种‘甬早红’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 41-42. |
[8] | 王晓玥, 闫爱玲, 张国军, 王慧玲, 任建成, 刘振华, 孙 磊, 徐海英, . 葡萄新品种‘瑞都晚红’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 29-30. |
[9] | 王勇健, 孔俊花, 范培格, 梁振昌, 金秀良, 刘布春, 代占武. 葡萄表型组高通量获取及分析方法研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(8): 1815-1832. |
[10] | 张秋悦, 刘昌来, 于晓晶, 杨甲定, 封超年. 盐胁迫条件下杜梨叶片差异表达基因qRT-PCR内参基因筛选[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(7): 1557-1570. |
[11] | 魏晓羽, 王跃进. 中国野生葡萄果皮解剖结构与白粉病抗性的相关性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(6): 1200-1212. |
[12] | 刘众杰, 郑婷, 赵方贵, 傅伟红, 诸葛雅贤, 张志昌, 房经贵. 葡萄砧木对渗透胁迫的抗性差异及生理响应机理[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(5): 984-994. |
[13] | 梁晨, 孙如意, 向锐, 孙艺萌, 师校欣, 杜国强, 王莉. 葡萄生长调控因子GRF家族基因的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(5): 995-1007. |
[14] | 李莎莎, 玉赛赛, 傅雨恒, 骆强伟, 徐炎, 王跃进. 利用胚挽救与分子标记选育葡萄无核抗寒新种质[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 723-738. |
[15] | 李亚梅, 马福利, 张山奇, 黄锦秋, 陈梦婷, 周军永, 孙其宝, 孙俊. 酸枣愈伤组织转化体系构建及在ZjBRC1调控ZjYUCCA表达中的应用[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 749-757. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司