Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9): 2769-2782.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0414
• Cultivation · Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZENG Chong, REN Li, LI Lantao, CAI Jiaming, GENG Sainan, WANG Yilun*(
)
Received:2026-05-07
Revised:2026-07-14
Online:2026-09-25
Published:2026-09-20
Contact:
WANG Yilun
CLC Number:
ZENG Chong, REN Li, LI Lantao, CAI Jiaming, GENG Sainan, WANG Yilun. Effects of New Urea Combined with Calcium Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics,Quality and Yield of Non-Heading Chinese Cabbage[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(9): 2769-2782.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0414
| 处理 Treatment | 净光合速率/(µmol ∙ m-2 · s-1) Pn | 蒸腾速率/(mmol ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1) Tr | 气孔导度/(mol ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1)Gs | Rubisco酶/(U ∙ L-1) Rubisco enzyme content |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca0N0 | 6.88 ± 0.94 b | 1.21 ± 0.14 d | 0.074 ± 0.008 c | 821.33 ± 33.11 b |
| Ca0N1 | 17.85 ± 1.47 a | 3.91 ± 0.24 c | 0.245 ± 0.043 b | 865.94 ± 18.04 ab |
| Ca0N2 | 18.30 ± 1.48 a | 4.06 ± 0.32 bc | 0.262 ± 0.025 b | 880.48 ± 31.84 ab |
| Ca0N3 | 19.25 ± 0.91 a | 5.04 ± 0.21 a | 0.330 ± 0.020 a | 917.94 ± 25.58 a |
| Ca0N4 | 19.93 ± 0.64 a | 4.76 ± 0.82 ab | 0.276 ± 0.017 b | 903.21 ± 56.46 a |
| Ca1N0 | 8.67 ± 1.09 c | 1.76 ± 0.08 c | 0.120 ± 0.020 d | 846.47 ± 40.64 c |
| Ca1N1 | 19.24 ± 0.63 b | 5.59 ± 0.64 b | 0.369 ± 0.059 c | 929.77 ± 19.39 b |
| Ca1N2 | 20.93 ± 1.09 ab | 6.71 ± 0.63 b | 0.451 ± 0.053 b | 966.73 ± 25.72 ab |
| Ca1N3 | 21.99 ± 1.72 a | 8.41 ± 0.73 a | 0.582 ± 0.019 a | 994.91 ± 38.74 a |
| Ca1N4 | 22.31 ± 0.84 a | 8.79 ± 0.97 a | 0.639 ± 0.015 a | 1 001.56 ± 14.58 a |
| 方差分析ANOVA | ||||
| N | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Ca | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| N × Ca | ns | *** | *** | ns |
Table 1 Effects of different urea combined with calcium fertilizer on photosynthetic parameters and Rubisco enzyme of non-heading Chinese cabbage
| 处理 Treatment | 净光合速率/(µmol ∙ m-2 · s-1) Pn | 蒸腾速率/(mmol ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1) Tr | 气孔导度/(mol ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1)Gs | Rubisco酶/(U ∙ L-1) Rubisco enzyme content |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca0N0 | 6.88 ± 0.94 b | 1.21 ± 0.14 d | 0.074 ± 0.008 c | 821.33 ± 33.11 b |
| Ca0N1 | 17.85 ± 1.47 a | 3.91 ± 0.24 c | 0.245 ± 0.043 b | 865.94 ± 18.04 ab |
| Ca0N2 | 18.30 ± 1.48 a | 4.06 ± 0.32 bc | 0.262 ± 0.025 b | 880.48 ± 31.84 ab |
| Ca0N3 | 19.25 ± 0.91 a | 5.04 ± 0.21 a | 0.330 ± 0.020 a | 917.94 ± 25.58 a |
| Ca0N4 | 19.93 ± 0.64 a | 4.76 ± 0.82 ab | 0.276 ± 0.017 b | 903.21 ± 56.46 a |
| Ca1N0 | 8.67 ± 1.09 c | 1.76 ± 0.08 c | 0.120 ± 0.020 d | 846.47 ± 40.64 c |
| Ca1N1 | 19.24 ± 0.63 b | 5.59 ± 0.64 b | 0.369 ± 0.059 c | 929.77 ± 19.39 b |
| Ca1N2 | 20.93 ± 1.09 ab | 6.71 ± 0.63 b | 0.451 ± 0.053 b | 966.73 ± 25.72 ab |
| Ca1N3 | 21.99 ± 1.72 a | 8.41 ± 0.73 a | 0.582 ± 0.019 a | 994.91 ± 38.74 a |
| Ca1N4 | 22.31 ± 0.84 a | 8.79 ± 0.97 a | 0.639 ± 0.015 a | 1 001.56 ± 14.58 a |
| 方差分析ANOVA | ||||
| N | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Ca | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| N × Ca | ns | *** | *** | ns |
Fig. 1 Effects of different urea combined with calcium fertilizer on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of non-heading Chinese cabbage Different lowercase letters indicate that the difference between different nitrogen fertilizer treatments under the same calcium level is 0.05 significant level. The same below
| 处理 Treatment | 单株氮积累量/mg Nitrogen accumulation per plant | 单株钙积累量/mg Calcium accumulation per plant | 氮肥利用率/% Nitrogen use efficiency | 氮肥农学效率/(g · g-1) Nitrogen agronomic efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca0N0 | 9.07 ± 0.28 c | 1.54 ± 0.34 d | — | — |
| Ca0N1 | 70.99 ± 5.06 b | 8.44 ± 0.28 c | 41.28 ± 3.37 b | 255.04 ± 42.18 b |
| Ca0N2 | 75.76 ± 6.60 b | 9.58 ± 0.17 b | 44.46 ± 4.40 b | 305.67 ± 13.38 a |
| Ca0N3 | 87.09 ± 1.78 a | 11.05 ± 0.32 a | 52.01 ± 1.19 a | 322.82 ± 11.02 a |
| Ca0N4 | 85.98 ± 4.50 a | 10.98 ± 0.39 a | 51.27 ± 3.00 a | 319.46 ± 14.64 a |
| Ca1N0 | 12.33 ± 0.81 c | 2.06 ± 0.12 c | — | — |
| Ca1N1 | 84.45 ± 3.43 b | 10.16 ± 1.42 b | 48.08 ± 2.28 b | 281.77 ± 26.14 b |
| Ca1N2 | 88.20 ± 3.21 b | 11.74 ± 1.05 ab | 50.58 ± 2.14 b | 314.52 ± 2.98 ab |
| Ca1N3 | 97.36 ± 5.28 a | 13.26 ± 1.04 a | 56.69 ± 3.52 a | 346.95 ± 24.76 a |
| Ca1N4 | 101.18 ± 6.33 a | 13.38 ± 1.36 a | 59.23 ± 4.22 a | 344.05 ± 20.00 a |
| 方差分析ANOVA | ||||
| N | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Ca | *** | *** | *** | * |
| N × Ca | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Table 2 Effects of different urea combined with calcium fertilizer on nitrogen utilization of non-heading Chinese cabbage
| 处理 Treatment | 单株氮积累量/mg Nitrogen accumulation per plant | 单株钙积累量/mg Calcium accumulation per plant | 氮肥利用率/% Nitrogen use efficiency | 氮肥农学效率/(g · g-1) Nitrogen agronomic efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca0N0 | 9.07 ± 0.28 c | 1.54 ± 0.34 d | — | — |
| Ca0N1 | 70.99 ± 5.06 b | 8.44 ± 0.28 c | 41.28 ± 3.37 b | 255.04 ± 42.18 b |
| Ca0N2 | 75.76 ± 6.60 b | 9.58 ± 0.17 b | 44.46 ± 4.40 b | 305.67 ± 13.38 a |
| Ca0N3 | 87.09 ± 1.78 a | 11.05 ± 0.32 a | 52.01 ± 1.19 a | 322.82 ± 11.02 a |
| Ca0N4 | 85.98 ± 4.50 a | 10.98 ± 0.39 a | 51.27 ± 3.00 a | 319.46 ± 14.64 a |
| Ca1N0 | 12.33 ± 0.81 c | 2.06 ± 0.12 c | — | — |
| Ca1N1 | 84.45 ± 3.43 b | 10.16 ± 1.42 b | 48.08 ± 2.28 b | 281.77 ± 26.14 b |
| Ca1N2 | 88.20 ± 3.21 b | 11.74 ± 1.05 ab | 50.58 ± 2.14 b | 314.52 ± 2.98 ab |
| Ca1N3 | 97.36 ± 5.28 a | 13.26 ± 1.04 a | 56.69 ± 3.52 a | 346.95 ± 24.76 a |
| Ca1N4 | 101.18 ± 6.33 a | 13.38 ± 1.36 a | 59.23 ± 4.22 a | 344.05 ± 20.00 a |
| 方差分析ANOVA | ||||
| N | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Ca | *** | *** | *** | * |
| N × Ca | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Fig. 5 Correlation analysis of yield,quality and components of non-heading Chinese cabbage under different urea and calcium fertilizer combined application
| [1] |
doi: 10.3390/agronomy11040765 URL |
| [2] |
|
|
丁文成, 何萍, 周卫. 2023. 我国新型肥料产业发展战略研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 29 (2):201-219.
|
|
| [3] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147778 URL |
| [4] |
doi: 10.1186/s42269-020-00294-z |
| [5] |
|
|
韩瑞锋, 郭雨琴, 王玉琢, 成永三, 侯雷平, 张毅. 2024. 氮形态对小白菜根系生长、根区pH及细胞壁组分的影响. 中国农业科学, 57 (11):2215-2226.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.11.013 |
|
| [6] |
|
|
李南瑾, 沈林恩, 王良杰, 遆超普, 颜晓元. 2025. 我国蔬菜种植系统氮肥利用率及其驱动因子. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 33 (6):1103-1116.
|
|
| [7] |
|
|
李诗琰. 2025. 减氮配施腐植酸对土壤微环境及菠菜生长的影响[硕士论文]. 西安: 西安理工大学.
|
|
| [8] |
|
|
李昕颖, 赵庆霞, 张成富, 蔡银美, 何腾兵. 2022. 沼液氮肥对白菜型油菜叶片光合特性与叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 分子植物育种, 20 (10):3381-3385.
|
|
| [9] |
|
|
李中勇, 张媛, 韩龙慧, 徐继忠. 2013. 氮钙互作对设施栽培油桃叶片光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 19 (4):893-900.
|
|
| [10] |
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.1016 |
|
刘迁杰, 程云霞, 贾凯, 时振宇, 张婧, 魏少伟, 吴慧. 2021. 施氮量对复合沙培番茄氮代谢酶活性及品质和产量的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 23 (4):183-191.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.1016 |
|
| [11] |
|
|
刘欣悦, 刘轶飞, 易伯涛, 孙志宇, 张思威, 马明珠, 韩晓日. 2022. 外源钙缓解花生低温光合障碍的调控机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 28 (2):291-301.
|
|
| [12] |
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.12.011 |
|
马腾飞, 李青军, 张炎,哈丽哈什 · 依巴提,张鹏忠. 2017. 控失尿素施用量及不同配比对新疆加工番茄产量、品质、氮肥利用率的影响. 新疆农业科学, 54 (12):2239-2247.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.12.011 |
|
| [13] |
|
|
孟凡非, 康铁东, 杨成, 付雨, 邹杰, 王汉超. 2022. 化肥减量施用对蔬菜地氮素流失控制及小白菜生长的影响. 西南农业学报, 35 (11):2603-2608.
|
|
| [14] |
|
|
闵炬, 施卫明. 2009. 不同施氮量对太湖地区大棚蔬菜产量、氮肥利用率及品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 15 (1):151-157.
|
|
| [15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112921 URL |
| [16] |
|
|
蒲敏, 冶军, 阮向阳, 肖乐乐, 刘若文, 李然. 2022. 钙镁肥对石灰性土壤加工番茄产量和品质的影响. 北方园艺,(5):8-14.
|
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105514 URL |
| [19] |
doi: 10.1007/s11738-022-03401-x |
| [20] |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00440 pmid: 31073302 |
| [21] |
doi: 10.3390/ijms20061353 URL |
| [22] |
|
|
王齐龙. 2020. 减氮配施钙、镁、硼、钼对几种蔬菜产量和品质的影响[硕士论文]. 佛山: 佛山科学技术学院.
|
|
| [23] |
|
|
翁小航, 李慧, 周永斌, 任城帅, 刘丽颖, 杨成超.张淞著,朱文旭, 2021. 氮钙协同对杨树生长、光合特性及叶绿素荧光的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 52 (3):356-361.
|
|
| [24] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0101 |
|
吴珏, 施颖红, 唐玉英, 王馨曼, 占绣萍. 2026. 上海地区不结球白菜农艺性状和营养品质分析与评价. 园艺学报, 53 (1):219-228.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0101 |
|
| [25] |
doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-07631-2 |
| [26] |
|
|
严瑾. 2014. 土壤基础供氮能力与小白菜氮素利用率的相关关系研究[硕士论文]. 上海: 上海交通大学.
|
|
| [27] |
doi: 10.3390/foods14050872 URL |
| [28] |
|
|
杨锚, 邵华, 金芬, 王静, 叶志华, 刘肃. 2009. 新鲜蔬菜和水果中硝酸盐紫外分光光度法的测定. 华中农业大学学报, 28 (1):102-105.
|
|
| [29] |
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2023017 |
|
尤召阳, 王建国, 刘颖, 闫振辉, 张佳蕾, 万书波. 2024. 氮钙互作对花生氮素利用及钙素积累的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 46 (4):904-912.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2023017 |
|
| [30] |
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20195161 |
|
于滨, 李喜凤, 任荣魁, 叶优良, 胡国庆, 董元杰. 2024. 不同增效氮肥对苹果生长、氮素利用率和土壤氮素供应能力的影响. 华北农学报, 39 (6):176-185.
|
|
| [31] |
|
|
袁伟玲, 陈磊夫, 刘志雄, 吴金平, 袁尚勇. 2020. 外源钙对小白菜酶活性、钙含量及其产量和品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(6):254-261.
|
|
| [32] |
|
|
岳亚康, 金朝阳, 张铭, 李中勇. 2021. 不同氮钙水平对设施桃果实品质的影响. 中国果树,(4):55-58.
|
|
| [33] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0549 |
|
张昌伟, 厉恩铜, 王文龙, 侯喜林. 2026. 不结球白菜的起源、进化、研究及产业发展. 园艺学报, 53 (3):892-918.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0549 |
|
| [34] |
|
|
张冠初, 戴良香, 徐扬, 丁红, 慈敦伟, 秦斐斐, 郭峰, 张智猛. 2020. 减氮配施钙肥对花生光合特性、产量及肥料贡献率的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 42 (6):1010-1018.
|
|
| [35] |
|
|
张可, 李东坡, 杜艳娣, 薛妍, 宋玉超, 张艺籍, 李永华, 郑野, 张金明, 崔永坤. 2023. 包膜与稳定性氮肥改善棕壤理化和生物学肥力并延缓酸化的效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 29 (3):472-482.
|
|
| [36] |
|
|
张逸, 王允, 刘灿玉, 张志焕, 韩敏, 曹逼力, 徐坤. 2016. 钙水平对大葱生长及氮代谢的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 22 (5):1366-1373.
|
|
| [37] |
|
|
张英鹏, 高燕, 孙明, 于仁起, 魏建林, 李彦. 2009. 氮钙配合施用对菠菜产量及品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(1):35-39.
|
|
| [38] |
|
|
张志良, 李小方. 2016. 植物生理学实验指导. 5版. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
|
|
| [39] |
|
|
赵秉强. 2016. 传统化肥增效改性提升产品性能与功能. 植物营养与肥料学报, 22 (1):1-7.
|
|
| [40] |
|
|
周丽平, 杨俐苹, 白由路, 卢艳丽, 王磊, 倪露. 2016. 不同氮肥缓释化处理对夏玉米田间氨挥发和氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 22 (6):1449-1457.
|
| [1] | HUANG Minmin, NING Wanjun, ZHANG Yi, WANG Baoqing, MAHEMUTI · Abulaiti, ADILAI · Maimaiti, ZHANG Qiang. A New Walnut Cultivar‘Mobao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 69-70. |
| [2] | PATIGULI · Maimaitituerxun, LUO Qinghong, ZHOU Bin, SHENG Wei, JIANG Teng, LIU Ping. A New Cultivar of Elaeagnus moorcroftii‘Hongyu’in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 85-86. |
| [3] | PATIGULI · Maimaitituerxun, ZHOU Bin, LUO Qinghong, SHENG Wei, JIANG Teng, Nuermaimaiti · Yili, HE Huijuan. A New Cultivar of Elaeagnus moorcroftii‘Baishatian’in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 87-88. |
| [4] | LIU Zhitai, GUO Jiulin, ZHANG Wenjie, LIU Xiaohua, WANG Ping, WANG Hongle, LI Chengpu, FENG Kaibin, XU Liping, HU Zhansen, LI Zhufei. A New Strawberry Cultivar‘Chengmei 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 115-116. |
| [5] | LI Guoliang, ZHANG Shifan, LI Fei, ZHANG Hui, SUN Rifei, ZHANG Shujiang. A New Root Mustard Cultivar‘Yuanrun 65’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 121-122. |
| [6] | LIN Yihan, CHEN Jiekai, LIN Aixi. A New Miben Pumpkin Cultivar‘Baisha 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 147-148. |
| [7] | FENG Yidi, LI Lifang, YANG Min, GAO Penghua, GUO Jianwei, HUANG Feiyan, ZHAO Jianrong, KONG Chuisi, DONG Kun, QI Ying, YU Lei. A New Konjak Cultivar‘Zhuyahuang 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 165-166. |
| [8] | KUANG Jing, LIU Zhengwei, SUN Yalin, LI Feng, WANG Zhixin, LIU Yuping, YANG Yingnan, KE Weidong, ZHU Honglian. A New Special Lotus Root Cultivar for Lotus Sprout‘Baiyuzan 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 177-178. |
| [9] | XUE Zhihui, CAO Shixian, YU Shuntian, LI Fang, XU Jie, CHEN Zhidan, SUN Weijiang. A New Camellia sinensis Cultivar‘Jinfuxing 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 327-328. |
| [10] | XU Juan, LIU Rong, ZHANG Yujiao, PU Tingting, WANG Sibo, LI Xinping, DUAN Baozhong. A Superior,High-Yielding Cultivar of Aconitum carmichaelii‘Yunfu 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 349-350. |
| [11] | LIANG Liyan, ZHOU Ying, XU Juan, LIN Yuan, LIU Tingxia, WANG Sibo, DUAN Baozhong, LI Xinping. A High-Yielding Cultivar of Aconitum carmichaelii‘Yunfu 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 351-352. |
| [12] | SONG Yang, LIU Yingyao, ZHAO Quan, ZHANG Peian, LIU Dongfeng, SHAN Linwen, CHEN Guanju, FANG Jinggui, GUO Xiuzhu. Analysis of Fruit Quality and Comprehensive Evaluation of 47 Chinese Bayberry Germplasm Resources in Southern Zhejiang [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(9): 2575-2589. |
| [13] | WANG Xingyue, ZHANG Jining, LU Ping, JIANG Zheng, SUN Huifeng, ZHANG Xianxian, WANG Cong, ZHOU Sheng. Applying Equal Carbon Application from Organic Materials Improved Vegetable Yield,Quality and Soil Carbon Components [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(9): 2719-2732. |
| [14] | SHANG Xingpan, NIU Yu, BAI Peng, HE Yongmei, FENG Junfang, WANG Junwen, CHEN Jiaqi, TANG Zhongqi, LÜ Jian, XIAO Xuemei, WU Yue, YU Jihua. The Effects of Different Compost Ratios on the Quality and Secondary Metabolism of Tomato in Protected Cultivation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(9): 2752-2768. |
| [15] | DING Zhenzhen, SU Tingting, WANG Xueqing, WANG Li, WANG Yutao. Evaluation of Fruit Quality Traits and Analysis of Characteristic Aroma Compounds in Plum(Prunus spp.)Cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(8): 2381-2399. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd