Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (10): 2386-2400.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0599
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Zexiong1, QIU Yuanxin1,*(), MO Guanlian1, CHEN Caiyun1, LIU Jianliang1, WANG Qin1, ZHONG Le1, XIE Hongfeng2
Received:
2024-04-29
Revised:
2024-07-17
Online:
2024-10-25
Published:
2024-10-21
Contact:
QIU Yuanxin
ZHANG Zexiong, QIU Yuanxin, MO Guanlian, CHEN Caiyun, LIU Jianliang, WANG Qin, ZHONG Le, XIE Hongfeng. Preparation of Fermented Fertilizer from the Waste of Fish,Peanuts,and Soybean and Its Effect on Peach Quality[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(10): 2386-2400.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0599
Fig. 1 Effects of EM bacterial inoculum amount,solid-to-liquid ratio and fermentation time on amino acid nitrogen,pH and soluble solids content in fermented fertilizer
试验号 Run | A EM接种量/% EM bacterial inoculation amount | B 料液比 Solid-to-liquid ratio | C 发酵时间/d Fermentation time | Y 氨基酸态氮含量/(g · L-1) Amino acid nitrogen content |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -1(3) | -1(1︰2) | 0(11) | 5.10 ± 0.08 |
2 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.54 ± 0.06 |
3 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.30 ± 0.05 |
4 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.59 ± 0.12 |
5 | 1(7) | -1(1︰2) | 0(11) | 4.89 ± 0.18 |
6 | 1(7) | 1(1︰4) | 0(11) | 4.38 ± 0.29 |
7 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.50 ± 0.07 |
8 | -1(3) | 0(1︰3) | 1(13) | 5.13 ± 0.10 |
9 | 0(5) | -1(1︰2) | -1(9) | 4.46 ± 0.33 |
10 | -1(3) | 1(1︰4) | 0(11) | 3.56 ± 0.15 |
11 | 0(5) | 1(1︰4) | -1(9) | 3.74 ± 0.23 |
12 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.32 ± 0.19 |
13 | -1(3) | 0(1︰3) | -1(9) | 3.46 ± 0.00 |
14 | 1(7) | 0(1︰3) | 1(13) | 4.23 ± 0.09 |
15 | 5 | 1︰2 | 13 | 5.52 ± 0.06 |
16 | 7 | 1︰3 | 9 | 4.28 ± 0.11 |
17 | 5 | 1︰4 | 13 | 4.26 ± 0.17 |
Table 1 Response surface experimental design and results
试验号 Run | A EM接种量/% EM bacterial inoculation amount | B 料液比 Solid-to-liquid ratio | C 发酵时间/d Fermentation time | Y 氨基酸态氮含量/(g · L-1) Amino acid nitrogen content |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -1(3) | -1(1︰2) | 0(11) | 5.10 ± 0.08 |
2 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.54 ± 0.06 |
3 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.30 ± 0.05 |
4 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.59 ± 0.12 |
5 | 1(7) | -1(1︰2) | 0(11) | 4.89 ± 0.18 |
6 | 1(7) | 1(1︰4) | 0(11) | 4.38 ± 0.29 |
7 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.50 ± 0.07 |
8 | -1(3) | 0(1︰3) | 1(13) | 5.13 ± 0.10 |
9 | 0(5) | -1(1︰2) | -1(9) | 4.46 ± 0.33 |
10 | -1(3) | 1(1︰4) | 0(11) | 3.56 ± 0.15 |
11 | 0(5) | 1(1︰4) | -1(9) | 3.74 ± 0.23 |
12 | 0(5) | 0(1︰3) | 0(11) | 5.32 ± 0.19 |
13 | -1(3) | 0(1︰3) | -1(9) | 3.46 ± 0.00 |
14 | 1(7) | 0(1︰3) | 1(13) | 4.23 ± 0.09 |
15 | 5 | 1︰2 | 13 | 5.52 ± 0.06 |
16 | 7 | 1︰3 | 9 | 4.28 ± 0.11 |
17 | 5 | 1︰4 | 13 | 4.26 ± 0.17 |
来源Source | 平方和Sum of squares | 自由度df | 均方Mean square | F值F-value | P值P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 8.31 | 9 | 0.9231 | 49.73 | < 0.0001** |
A | 0.0351 | 1 | 0.0351 | 1.89 | 0.2114 |
B | 2.03 | 1 | 2.03 | 109.38 | < 0.0001** |
C | 1.28 | 1 | 1.28 | 68.96 | < 0.0001** |
AB | 0.2652 | 1 | 0.2652 | 14.29 | 0.0069** |
AC | 0.7396 | 1 | 0.7396 | 39.85 | 0.0004** |
BC | 0.0729 | 1 | 0.0729 | 3.93 | 0.0879 |
A | 1.48 | 1 | 1.48 | 79.97 | < 0.0001** |
B | 0.5882 | 1 | 0.5882 | 31.69 | 0.0008** |
C | 1.42 | 1 | 1.42 | 76.64 | < 0.0001** |
残差 Residual | 0.1299 | 7 | 0.0186 | ||
失拟残差 Lack of fit | 0.0603 | 3 | 0.0201 | 1.16 | 0.4294 |
纯误差 Pure error | 0.0696 | 4 | 0.0174 | ||
总和 Total | 8.44 | 16 |
Table 2 Regression equation analysis of variance
来源Source | 平方和Sum of squares | 自由度df | 均方Mean square | F值F-value | P值P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 8.31 | 9 | 0.9231 | 49.73 | < 0.0001** |
A | 0.0351 | 1 | 0.0351 | 1.89 | 0.2114 |
B | 2.03 | 1 | 2.03 | 109.38 | < 0.0001** |
C | 1.28 | 1 | 1.28 | 68.96 | < 0.0001** |
AB | 0.2652 | 1 | 0.2652 | 14.29 | 0.0069** |
AC | 0.7396 | 1 | 0.7396 | 39.85 | 0.0004** |
BC | 0.0729 | 1 | 0.0729 | 3.93 | 0.0879 |
A | 1.48 | 1 | 1.48 | 79.97 | < 0.0001** |
B | 0.5882 | 1 | 0.5882 | 31.69 | 0.0008** |
C | 1.42 | 1 | 1.42 | 76.64 | < 0.0001** |
残差 Residual | 0.1299 | 7 | 0.0186 | ||
失拟残差 Lack of fit | 0.0603 | 3 | 0.0201 | 1.16 | 0.4294 |
纯误差 Pure error | 0.0696 | 4 | 0.0174 | ||
总和 Total | 8.44 | 16 |
处理 Treatment | 生长发育阶段 Developmental stage | 单果质量/g Single fruit weight | 纵径/cm Length | 横径/cm Diameter | 果形指数 Fruit shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发酵肥 | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 112.84 ± 6.73 e | 6.60 ± 0.26 de | 5.35 ± 0.11 c | 1.23 a |
Fermented fertilizer | 膨果期 Expanding period | 169.60 ± 12.39 c | 7.36 ± 0.19 bc | 6.13 ± 0.22 b | 1.20 a |
成熟期 Maturity | 246.39 ± 6.86 a | 8.20 ± 0.47 a | 6.83 ± 0.29 a | 1.20 a | |
复合化肥(对照) | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 95.29 ± 6.82 f | 6.22 ± 0.43 e | 4.90 ± 0.14 d | 1.27 a |
Chemical fertilizer(control) | 膨果期 Expanding period | 155.16 ± 8.29 d | 7.14 ± 0.26 cd | 5.82 ± 0.20 b | 1.23 a |
成熟期 Maturity | 215.32 ± 3.70 b | 7.93 ± 0.26 ab | 6.65 ± 0.09 a | 1.19 a |
Table 3 Effect of fermented fertilizer on fruit appearance
处理 Treatment | 生长发育阶段 Developmental stage | 单果质量/g Single fruit weight | 纵径/cm Length | 横径/cm Diameter | 果形指数 Fruit shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发酵肥 | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 112.84 ± 6.73 e | 6.60 ± 0.26 de | 5.35 ± 0.11 c | 1.23 a |
Fermented fertilizer | 膨果期 Expanding period | 169.60 ± 12.39 c | 7.36 ± 0.19 bc | 6.13 ± 0.22 b | 1.20 a |
成熟期 Maturity | 246.39 ± 6.86 a | 8.20 ± 0.47 a | 6.83 ± 0.29 a | 1.20 a | |
复合化肥(对照) | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 95.29 ± 6.82 f | 6.22 ± 0.43 e | 4.90 ± 0.14 d | 1.27 a |
Chemical fertilizer(control) | 膨果期 Expanding period | 155.16 ± 8.29 d | 7.14 ± 0.26 cd | 5.82 ± 0.20 b | 1.23 a |
成熟期 Maturity | 215.32 ± 3.70 b | 7.93 ± 0.26 ab | 6.65 ± 0.09 a | 1.19 a |
处理 Treatment | 生长发育阶段 Developmental stage | 总酸/% Total acidity | 水含量/% Moisture content | 可溶性总糖/% Total soluble sugar | 可溶性固 形物/Brix° Soluble solid | 还原型维生素C/ (μg · g-1) Reduced vitamin C | 可溶性果胶/ (g • kg-1) Soluble pectin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发酵肥 Fermented fertilizer | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 0.39 ± 0.04 ab | 85.48 ± 0.24 c | 8.93 ± 0.55 e | 9.96 ± 0.34 e | 1 483.80 ± 34.48 a | 3.10 ± 0.10 c |
膨果期 Expanding period | 0.33 ± 0.03 bc | 84.51 ± 0.37 d | 11.63 ± 0.29 c | 12.06 ± 0.36 c | 1 324.60 ± 46.89 b | 3.90 ± 0.14 b | |
成熟期 Maturity | 0.24 ± 0.02 d | 83.38 ± 0.41 e | 14.38 ± 0.36 a | 14.76 ± 0.31 a | 1 182.42 ± 70.31 cd | 4.84 ± 0.07 a | |
复合化肥(对照) Chemical fertilizer (control) | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 0.43 ± 0.03 a | 86.95 ± 0.51 a | 8.44 ± 0.28 e | 9.06 ± 0.36 f | 1 295.40 ± 48.50 bc | 2.43 ± 0.12 d |
膨果期 Expanding period | 0.38 ± 0.04 ab | 86.64 ± 0.19 ab | 10.38 ± 0.42 d | 10.80 ± 0.44 d | 1 155.17 ± 52.96 de | 3.26 ± 0.09 c | |
成熟期 Maturity | 0.29 ± 0.04 cd | 85.95 ± 0.31 ab | 13.23 ± 0.50 b | 13.46 ± 0.41 b | 1 058.4 ± 35.47 e | 3.89 ± 0.12 b |
Table 4 Fruit nutrient composition of two fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 生长发育阶段 Developmental stage | 总酸/% Total acidity | 水含量/% Moisture content | 可溶性总糖/% Total soluble sugar | 可溶性固 形物/Brix° Soluble solid | 还原型维生素C/ (μg · g-1) Reduced vitamin C | 可溶性果胶/ (g • kg-1) Soluble pectin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发酵肥 Fermented fertilizer | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 0.39 ± 0.04 ab | 85.48 ± 0.24 c | 8.93 ± 0.55 e | 9.96 ± 0.34 e | 1 483.80 ± 34.48 a | 3.10 ± 0.10 c |
膨果期 Expanding period | 0.33 ± 0.03 bc | 84.51 ± 0.37 d | 11.63 ± 0.29 c | 12.06 ± 0.36 c | 1 324.60 ± 46.89 b | 3.90 ± 0.14 b | |
成熟期 Maturity | 0.24 ± 0.02 d | 83.38 ± 0.41 e | 14.38 ± 0.36 a | 14.76 ± 0.31 a | 1 182.42 ± 70.31 cd | 4.84 ± 0.07 a | |
复合化肥(对照) Chemical fertilizer (control) | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 0.43 ± 0.03 a | 86.95 ± 0.51 a | 8.44 ± 0.28 e | 9.06 ± 0.36 f | 1 295.40 ± 48.50 bc | 2.43 ± 0.12 d |
膨果期 Expanding period | 0.38 ± 0.04 ab | 86.64 ± 0.19 ab | 10.38 ± 0.42 d | 10.80 ± 0.44 d | 1 155.17 ± 52.96 de | 3.26 ± 0.09 c | |
成熟期 Maturity | 0.29 ± 0.04 cd | 85.95 ± 0.31 ab | 13.23 ± 0.50 b | 13.46 ± 0.41 b | 1 058.4 ± 35.47 e | 3.89 ± 0.12 b |
处理 Treatment | 生长发育阶段 Developmental stage | 硬度/N Hardness | 咀嚼性/N Chewiness | 黏性/(N · s-1) Adhesiveness | 弹性 Springiness | 内聚性 Cohesiveness | 回复性 Resilience | 脆度/N Frangibility |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发酵肥 Fermented fertilizer | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 145.55 ± 5.02 a | 7.65 ± 0.88 a | -0.08 ± 0.01 ab | 0.49 ± 0.03 a | 0.11 ± 0.01 a | 0.36 ± 0.23 a | 118.71 ± 17.54 a |
膨果期 Expanding period | 125.25 ± 4.92 bc | 6.06 ± 0.77 abc | -0.07 ± 0.02 a | 0.47 ± 0.0 5a | 0.10 ± 0.00 a | 0.03 ± 0.00 a | 101.57 ± 9.00 ab | |
成熟期Maturity | 106.63 ± 5.28 d | 4.49 ± 0.09 cd | -0.08 ± 0.04 ab | 0.46 ± 0.04 a | 0.09 ± 0.00 a | 0.60 ± 0.48 a | 88.39 ± 2.57 b | |
复合化肥 (对照) Chemical fertilizer (control) | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 135.31 ± 6.99 ab | 6.25 ± 0.46 ab | -0.06 ± 0.03 a | 0.47 ± 0.03 a | 0.10 ± 0.01 a | 0.40 ± 0.26 a | 100.9 ± 7.72 ab |
膨果期 Expanding period | 114.88 ± 7.30 cd | 4.74 ± 1.12 bcd | -0.09 ± 0.01 ab | 0.44 ± 0.06 a | 0.09 ± 0.01 a | 0.28 ± 0.31 a | 96.91 ± 10.36 ab | |
成熟期Maturity | 89.19 ± 3.34 e | 4.12 ± 0.21 d | -0.13 ± 0.02 b | 0.50 ± 0.02 a | 0.09 ± 0.00 a | 0.50 ± 0.39 a | 77.95 ± 4.95 b |
Table 5 Fruit texture results of two fertilized treatments
处理 Treatment | 生长发育阶段 Developmental stage | 硬度/N Hardness | 咀嚼性/N Chewiness | 黏性/(N · s-1) Adhesiveness | 弹性 Springiness | 内聚性 Cohesiveness | 回复性 Resilience | 脆度/N Frangibility |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发酵肥 Fermented fertilizer | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 145.55 ± 5.02 a | 7.65 ± 0.88 a | -0.08 ± 0.01 ab | 0.49 ± 0.03 a | 0.11 ± 0.01 a | 0.36 ± 0.23 a | 118.71 ± 17.54 a |
膨果期 Expanding period | 125.25 ± 4.92 bc | 6.06 ± 0.77 abc | -0.07 ± 0.02 a | 0.47 ± 0.0 5a | 0.10 ± 0.00 a | 0.03 ± 0.00 a | 101.57 ± 9.00 ab | |
成熟期Maturity | 106.63 ± 5.28 d | 4.49 ± 0.09 cd | -0.08 ± 0.04 ab | 0.46 ± 0.04 a | 0.09 ± 0.00 a | 0.60 ± 0.48 a | 88.39 ± 2.57 b | |
复合化肥 (对照) Chemical fertilizer (control) | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 135.31 ± 6.99 ab | 6.25 ± 0.46 ab | -0.06 ± 0.03 a | 0.47 ± 0.03 a | 0.10 ± 0.01 a | 0.40 ± 0.26 a | 100.9 ± 7.72 ab |
膨果期 Expanding period | 114.88 ± 7.30 cd | 4.74 ± 1.12 bcd | -0.09 ± 0.01 ab | 0.44 ± 0.06 a | 0.09 ± 0.01 a | 0.28 ± 0.31 a | 96.91 ± 10.36 ab | |
成熟期Maturity | 89.19 ± 3.34 e | 4.12 ± 0.21 d | -0.13 ± 0.02 b | 0.50 ± 0.02 a | 0.09 ± 0.00 a | 0.50 ± 0.39 a | 77.95 ± 4.95 b |
[1] |
|
邓雪, 梁坚坤, 李利芬, 张本刚, 吴志刚. 2023. 油料饼粕基木材胶黏剂研究应用进展. 西北林学院学报, 38 (1):212-217.
|
|
[2] |
|
冯少平, 黄婷, 张晖, 王炳新, 董斌, 黄永芳. 2021. 油茶饼粕有机肥对马占相思和窿缘桉幼苗生长的影响. 亚热带植物科学, 50 (5):366-370.
|
|
[3] |
|
甘金佳, 毛玲莉, 蒋水元, 尹华田, 孙成荣, 潘美学. 2021. 施用EM菌发酵有机肥对番茄植株生长·产量和品质的影响. 安徽农业科学, 49 (24):178-181.
|
|
[4] |
GB 5009. 3-2016. National standard of the People’s Republic of China《Food safety national standard determination of moisture in food》. (in Chinese)
|
GB 5009. 3-2016. 中华人民共和国国家标准《食品安全国家标准食品中水分的测定》.
|
|
[5] |
|
郭振威, 李永山, 陈梦妮, 范巧兰, 王慧. 2022. 长期秸秆还田和施用有机肥对连作棉田土壤化学性质及微生物数量的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 27 (11):177-186.
|
|
[6] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0348 |
韩鲁杰, 冯一清, 杨秀华, 张宁, 毕焕改, 艾希珍. 2022. 有机肥化肥配施对大棚黄瓜根区土壤与根系特征的影响. 园艺学报, 49 (5):1047-1059.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0348 |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
黄国中, 王琴, 马路凯, 刘袆帆, 刘东杰, 王嘉沂, 陈小婷, 文芷懿. 2023. 缓冻和速冻对杨梅保藏期品质变化规律的探究. 食品工业科技, 44 (3):365-371.
|
|
[9] |
|
雷炼凯, 刘雨星, 许晴, 孔晨璐, 苏泳仪. 2023. 连平县鹰嘴蜜桃产业发展现状问题及对策. 南方农业, 17 (1):207-211.
|
|
[10] |
|
李红光. 2019. ‘瑞阳’、‘瑞雪’及其亲本果实贮藏过程中质地及细胞结构的差异分析[硕士论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
|
|
[11] |
|
李进, 袁春新, 孙正国, 黄步高. 2022. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对大棚连作草莓的影响. 中国果树,(11):12-16.
|
|
[12] |
|
李妍佳. 2011. 利用海藻制备动物营养源的研究[硕士论文]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学.
|
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0280 |
刘照霞, 张鑫, 王璐, 马玉婷, 陈倩, 朱占玲, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 2022. 肥料穴施位点对苹果细根生长、15N吸收利用及产量品质的影响. 园艺学报, 49 (7):1545-1556.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0280 |
|
[15] |
|
卢精林, 张红菊, 赵怀勇, 张东昱, 梁飞林. 2013. 有机肥与N、P、K化肥配施对苹果梨品质的影响. 土壤通报, 44 (4):931-933.
|
|
[16] |
|
马晶晶, 吴瑀婕, 李良, 黄瑾, 杨静, 杨彪, 邹烨, 王道营, 徐为民. 2022. 响应面法优化鸡肝发酵工艺. 肉类研究, 36 (8):13-20.
|
|
[17] |
|
庞荣丽, 张巧莲, 郭琳琳, 方金豹, 谢汉忠, 李君, 罗静, 吴丰魁. 2012. 水果及其制品中果胶含量的比色法测定条件优化. 果树学报, 29 (2):302-307.
|
|
[18] |
|
秦选吉. 2018. 发酵法处理鸡、鸭、羊部分下脚料生产微生物肥料的工艺研究[硕士论文]. 锦州: 锦州医科大学.
|
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
沈德龙, 曹凤明, 李力. 2007. 我国生物有机肥的发展现状及展望. 中国土壤与肥料,(6):1-5.
|
|
[23] |
|
宋敏. 2015. 微生物肥料的菌种筛选及发酵工艺研究[硕士论文]. 舟山: 浙江海洋学院.
|
|
[24] |
|
宋朝霞, 曹理, 李国辉. 2022. EM菌液对活性污泥好氧堆肥过程的影响. 河南工程学院学报(自然科学版), 34 (3):24-28.
|
|
[25] |
|
孙群, 胡景江. 2006. 植物生理学研究技术. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学出版社:172-174.
|
|
[26] |
|
孙万春, 周家昊, 俞巧钢, 林辉, 王强, 叶静, 邹平, 马军伟. 2022. 豆渣、猪粪有机肥施用水平对梨产量品质及土壤肥力的影响. 果树学报, 39 (9):1628-1638.
|
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20220415-179 |
王震, 裴令栋, 彭勇, 李林光, 王海波. 2023. 中早熟苹果品种的贮藏品质和酚类物质差异分析. 食品科学, 44 (7):202-210.
|
|
[32] |
|
乌兰君. 2017. 肉鸡屠宰下脚料发酵肥料及其产品开发[硕士论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学.
|
|
[33] |
|
伍少福, 韩科峰, 吴良欢. 2024. 生物有机肥加专用肥对葡萄园土壤养分、微生物和产量的影响. 园艺学报, 51 (5):1099-1112.
|
|
[34] |
|
杨飞, 李秀亚, 肖钧, 池再香, 韩世明. 2019. 红阳猕猴桃可溶性糖含量两种测定方法比较研究. 农家参谋,(5):78-79.
|
|
[35] |
|
杨星星, 崔迎雪, 武凌宇, 王亚囡, 刘远平, 李钰金, 魏玉西. 2017. 一种新型功能性海带豆酱的制备工艺研究. 海洋科学, 41 (6):48-54.
|
|
[36] |
|
杨阳, 于向荣, 杨立英, 王咏梅, 张加魁. 2018. 喷施EM菌发酵液在红宝石无核葡萄上的应用效果. 江苏农业科学, 46 (21):149-151.
|
|
[37] |
|
叶令帅, 刁松锋, 买旖旎, 王艺儒, 傅建敏. 2023. 柿果实发育成熟过程中重要农艺性状变化. 中国农业大学学报, 28 (1):111-122.
|
|
[38] |
|
袁鸣, 朱铭玮, 侯静, 朱莹莹, 李淑娴. 2022. 利用低场核磁共振技术检测刺槐种子吸水过程水分的变化. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 46 (2):135-142.
doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103018 |
|
[39] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0604 |
张帆, 杨阳, 王鸿, 张雪冰. 2024. 生物肥和有机肥对桃重茬土理化性状和细菌群落的改善作用. 园艺学报, 51 (9):2089-2104.
|
|
[40] |
|
张群, 舒楠, 宁密密, 李绍华. 2022. 不同施肥处理对‘东红’猕猴桃贮藏期间果实硬度及细胞壁降解的影响. 保鲜与加工, 22 (9):28-37.
|
|
[41] |
|
张雅娜, 郭昊, 杨九莹, 张磊, 马艺珊, 潘雨琪, 刘佳琦. 2023. 豆渣黑米曲奇饼干配方优化. 食品研究与开发, 44 (6):140-145.
|
|
[42] |
doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.027369 |
赵帅东, 尹轩威, 刘宇, 杨梓璐, 刘婷, 周婉婷, 陈雨滢, 汪立平, 宁喜斌. 2021. 不同发酵方式制备沙丁鱼下脚料速酿鱼露. 食品与发酵工业, 47 (23):143-148.
doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.027369 |
[1] | LIU Jianhao, JING Yanfu, LIU Yuexin, XU Yaoguang, YU Yang, GE Xiuxiu, XIE Hua. Identification of Peach NAC Gene Family and Role of PpNAC050 in Promoting Fruit Fructose Accumulation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 1983-1996. |
[2] | ZHANG Fan, YANG Yang, WANG Hong, ZHANG Xuebing. Improving Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Communities of Peach-Heavy Soils Using Biofertilizers and Organic Fertilizers [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 2089-2104. |
[3] | CHEN Xuesen, WANG Nan, PENG Futian, MAO Zhiquan, YIN Chengmiao, JIANG Yuanmao, GE Shunfeng, HU Dagang, LI Yuanyuan, DU Yuanpeng, YAO Yuxin, ZHANG Zongying. Advances in Quality and Maturity Breeding of Important Deciduous Fruit Trees in China [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(1): 8-26. |
[4] | SHI Meng, LIU Fengzhi, WANG Haibo, WANG Yingying, SHI Xiangbin, WANG Zhiqiang, LI Peng, LIU Wanchun, and WANG Xiaodi. A New Mid-ripening and Cold Resistant Peach Cultivar‘Zhonghan Cuixia’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 15-16. |
[5] | YANG Xingwang, WANG Yingying, WANG Haibo, WANG Xiaolong, WANG Zhiqiang, SHI Xiangbin, JI Xiaohao, LIU Wanchun, and WANG Xiaodi. A New Mid-ripening and Cold Resistant Peach Cultivar‘Zhonghan Hongqiong’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 17-18. |
[6] | DUAN Wenyi, NIU Liang, CUI Guochao, ZENG Wenfang, PAN Lei, SUN Shihang, and WANG Zhiqiang. A Late-ripening Yellow Peach Cultivar‘Zhongtaohuangjinmi No. 5’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 23-24. |
[7] | ZHOU Cheng, FANG Yi, ZHOU Jinyang, HUANG Qihao, PAN Yongjian, SHI Qianqian, NI Huixian, YANG Zhenfeng, SONG Chunbo. The Relationship Between Membrane Lipid Metabolism and Chilling Injury of Postharvest Peach Fruit Induced by Low Temperature [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1305-1317. |
[8] | XIAO Xiang, ZHOU Chujiang, JIN Shuwan, SHI Liyu, YANG Zhenfeng, CAO Shifeng, CHEN Wei. Mechanism of PpMADS2 and PpMADS3 Synergistically Regulating Carotenoids Accumulation in Peach Fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1173-1186. |
[9] | ZHOU Ping, GUO Rui, YAN Shaobin, JIN Guang. Molecular Mechanism Study of Exogenous Sorbitol Effects on Sugar Metabolism in Peach Leaves and Fruits [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(5): 959-971. |
[10] | YAN Juan, ZHAO Bintao, SUN Meng, SONG Hongfeng, CAI Zhixiang, LI Jiyao, SU Ziwen, ZHANG Minghao, SHEN Zhijun, XU Jianlan, MA Ruijuan, YU Mingliang. Adaptability of Peach Under Air Temperature Change Based on Chilling Requirment [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(4): 724-736. |
[11] | WAN Chunyan, HUO Hengzhi, MI Lin, LI Jinfeng, CHEN Xueping, CHEN Bingyi, DI Huatao, YAN Yongqi, YANG Yong, SONG Siyan. A New Peach Cultivar‘Zhentao 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(11): 2537-2538. |
[12] | WANG Zhaoyuan, LI Yonghong, CHANG Ruifeng, CHEN Hu, TIAN Qihang, LIU Guojian. A New Late-ripening Peach Cultivar‘Qiuyi’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(10): 2297-2298. |
[13] | ZHAI Hanhan, ZHAI Yujie, TIAN Yi, ZHANG Ye, YANG Li, WEN Zhiliang, CHEN Haijiang. Genome-wide Identification of Peach SAUR Gene Family and Characterization of PpSAUR5 Gene [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 1-14. |
[14] | XING Zhudong, LÜ Futang, GUO Shangjing, ZHANG Yanyi. A New Peach Cultivar‘Liaoda Hongjin’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 225-226. |
[15] | YANG Xingwang, WANG Haibo, WANG Yingying, WANG Xiaolong, WANG Zhiqiang, LIU Peipei, LIU Wanchun, and WANG Xiaodi. A New Mid-ripening and Cold Resistant Peach Cultivar‘Zhongnong Ganshuang’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 15-16. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd