Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9): 2733-2751.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0684
• Cultivation · Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
YAO Wenxia1, FAN Xiangjun1, HAN Jia1, LI Hui1, LU Yang1, YANG Hongyu1,*(
), ZHANG Yuxin2
Received:2026-03-23
Revised:2026-05-20
Online:2026-09-25
Published:2026-09-20
Contact:
YANG Hongyu
CLC Number:
YAO Wenxia, FAN Xiangjun, HAN Jia, LI Hui, LU Yang, YANG Hongyu, ZHANG Yuxin. Screening and Isolation of Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Onion Rhizosphere and the Growth-Promoting Effect of Composite Microbial Agents on Onion[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(9): 2733-2751.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0684
| 菌株 Strain | 溶磷量/(μg · mL-1) Phosphorus-solubilizing capacity | 固氮酶活性/(nmol · h-1 · mL-1) Nitrogenase activity | IAA分泌量/(μg · mL-1) IAA secretion amount | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JQ-MY-41 | 75.833 | 14.617 | 3.590 | 4.42 |
| JQ-MY-1 | 48.782 | 2.642 | 0.729 | 5.69 |
| JQ-MY-42 | 318.013 | 90.021 | — | 5.45 |
| JQ-271 | 420.962 | 7.134 | 1.184 | 4.31 |
| JQ-232(4) | 76.090 | — | — | 4.82 |
| JQ-142 | 77.628 | — | — | 5.40 |
| JQ-232(2) | 5.449 | — | — | 5.37 |
| JQ-6412 | 238.397 | — | — | 4.72 |
| JQ-232 | 225.064 | 49.488 | 0.238 | 6.24 |
| JQ-MY-2 | 56.474 | 85.649 | — | 5.34 |
| GT-5522 | 21.218 | — | — | 5.78 |
| GT-142 | 52.628 | — | — | 5.49 |
| GT-5521 | 18.782 | — | — | 5.81 |
| GT-331 | 263.782 | — | — | 4.44 |
| GT-441 | 455.577 | 7.134 | — | 4.32 |
| GT-151 | 161.859 | 24.782 | — | 5.04 |
| LJ-51 | 21.090 | 20.037 | 0.039 | 5.80 |
| LJ-41 | 126.346 | — | — | 5.05 |
| YC-4101 | 111.218 | 2.734 | 2.734 | 5.19 |
| YC-142 | 78.526 | 3.909 | — | 5.34 |
| YC-4211 | 454.167 | 12.152 | 2.567 | 4.11 |
| YC-142(2) | 449.551 | — | — | 4.23 |
| YC-342 | 455.833 | 4.824 | — | 5.64 |
| YC-161 | 14.295 | 5.355 | — | 6.27 |
| YC-561 | 13.782 | 5.110 | — | 6.25 |
Table 1 The determination results of phosphate solubilization,nitrogen fixation and IAA secretion ability of onion rhizosphere growth-promoting strains
| 菌株 Strain | 溶磷量/(μg · mL-1) Phosphorus-solubilizing capacity | 固氮酶活性/(nmol · h-1 · mL-1) Nitrogenase activity | IAA分泌量/(μg · mL-1) IAA secretion amount | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JQ-MY-41 | 75.833 | 14.617 | 3.590 | 4.42 |
| JQ-MY-1 | 48.782 | 2.642 | 0.729 | 5.69 |
| JQ-MY-42 | 318.013 | 90.021 | — | 5.45 |
| JQ-271 | 420.962 | 7.134 | 1.184 | 4.31 |
| JQ-232(4) | 76.090 | — | — | 4.82 |
| JQ-142 | 77.628 | — | — | 5.40 |
| JQ-232(2) | 5.449 | — | — | 5.37 |
| JQ-6412 | 238.397 | — | — | 4.72 |
| JQ-232 | 225.064 | 49.488 | 0.238 | 6.24 |
| JQ-MY-2 | 56.474 | 85.649 | — | 5.34 |
| GT-5522 | 21.218 | — | — | 5.78 |
| GT-142 | 52.628 | — | — | 5.49 |
| GT-5521 | 18.782 | — | — | 5.81 |
| GT-331 | 263.782 | — | — | 4.44 |
| GT-441 | 455.577 | 7.134 | — | 4.32 |
| GT-151 | 161.859 | 24.782 | — | 5.04 |
| LJ-51 | 21.090 | 20.037 | 0.039 | 5.80 |
| LJ-41 | 126.346 | — | — | 5.05 |
| YC-4101 | 111.218 | 2.734 | 2.734 | 5.19 |
| YC-142 | 78.526 | 3.909 | — | 5.34 |
| YC-4211 | 454.167 | 12.152 | 2.567 | 4.11 |
| YC-142(2) | 449.551 | — | — | 4.23 |
| YC-342 | 455.833 | 4.824 | — | 5.64 |
| YC-161 | 14.295 | 5.355 | — | 6.27 |
| YC-561 | 13.782 | 5.110 | — | 6.25 |
Fig. 2 Antagonism between growth-promoting strains in onion rhizosphere TA:JQ-232 + JQ-MY-42 + JQ-271;TB:GT-151 + JQ-MY-41 + JQ-271;TC:JQ-MY-41 + JQ-232 + YC-342;TD:JQ-MY-41 + JQ-232 + JQ-MY-42;TE:JQ-MY-41 + JQ-MY-42 + YC-342;TF:JQ-271 + JQ-232 + YC-342. The same below
| 菌株编号 Strain Number | 病原菌菌落直径/cm Pathogenic Bacterium Colony Diameter | 抑菌率/% Bacteriostatic rate |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 5.0 ± 0.1 a | — |
| JQ-MY-41 | 4.5 ± 0.2 ab | 10.24 ± 0.30 e |
| JQ-MY-42 | 4.4 ± 0.1 ab | 12.16 ± 0.24 d |
| JQ-271 | 4.3 ± 0.1 b | 14.10 ± 0.20 c |
| JQ-232 | 4.6 ± 0.1 a | 8.16 ± 0.26 f |
| YC-342 | 4.1 ± 0.1 c | 18.04 ± 0.16 a |
| GT-151 | 4.2 ± 0.1 bc | 16.06 ± 0.22 b |
Table 2 Antibacterial effect of dominant growth-promoting strains in onion rhizosphere on Fusarium oxysporum
| 菌株编号 Strain Number | 病原菌菌落直径/cm Pathogenic Bacterium Colony Diameter | 抑菌率/% Bacteriostatic rate |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 5.0 ± 0.1 a | — |
| JQ-MY-41 | 4.5 ± 0.2 ab | 10.24 ± 0.30 e |
| JQ-MY-42 | 4.4 ± 0.1 ab | 12.16 ± 0.24 d |
| JQ-271 | 4.3 ± 0.1 b | 14.10 ± 0.20 c |
| JQ-232 | 4.6 ± 0.1 a | 8.16 ± 0.26 f |
| YC-342 | 4.1 ± 0.1 c | 18.04 ± 0.16 a |
| GT-151 | 4.2 ± 0.1 bc | 16.06 ± 0.22 b |
Fig. 4 Effects of different compound microbial agent formulations on phosphorus solubilization,nitrogen fixation,IAA secretion ability and pH value of onion Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments(P < 0.05),Duncan’s multiple range test. The same below
Fig. 10 Correlation analysis of onion growth,physiology and soil indexes The red color in the graph represents positive correlation and the blue color represents negative correlation,and the darker color represents stronger correlation. * P < 0.05,** P < 0.01
| 指标 Index | 载荷 Load | |
|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | |
| 地上鲜质量 AFM | 0.089 | 0.092 |
| 地上干质量 ADM | 0.087 | 0.071 |
| 地下鲜质量 UFM | 0.083 | 0.163 |
| 地下干质量 UDM | 0.079 | 0.186 |
| 根系活力 RA | -0.056 | 0.072 |
| 株高 PH | 0.087 | -0.054 |
| 茎粗 SD | 0.089 | -0.076 |
| 超氧化物歧化酶 SOD | 0.093 | -0.012 |
| 过氧化物酶 POD | -0.052 | 0.258 |
| 过氧化氢酶 CAT | 0.042 | 0.296 |
| 抗坏血酸过氧化物酶 APX | 0.033 | -0.323 |
| 土壤蔗糖酶 S-UC | 0.093 | -0.043 |
| 土壤脲酶 S-UE | 0.091 | 0.007 |
| 土壤碱性磷酸酶 S-ALP | 0.089 | -0.057 |
| 土壤过氧化氢酶 S-CAT | 0.088 | -0.065 |
| 特征值 Eiges value | 10.649 | 2.806 |
| 方差贡献率/% Proportion of variance | 70.993 | 18.704 |
| 累积方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance | 70.993 | 89.697 |
Table 3 Principal component analysis and variance explanation of growth-promoting effects of different compound microbial inoculant formulations on onion
| 指标 Index | 载荷 Load | |
|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | |
| 地上鲜质量 AFM | 0.089 | 0.092 |
| 地上干质量 ADM | 0.087 | 0.071 |
| 地下鲜质量 UFM | 0.083 | 0.163 |
| 地下干质量 UDM | 0.079 | 0.186 |
| 根系活力 RA | -0.056 | 0.072 |
| 株高 PH | 0.087 | -0.054 |
| 茎粗 SD | 0.089 | -0.076 |
| 超氧化物歧化酶 SOD | 0.093 | -0.012 |
| 过氧化物酶 POD | -0.052 | 0.258 |
| 过氧化氢酶 CAT | 0.042 | 0.296 |
| 抗坏血酸过氧化物酶 APX | 0.033 | -0.323 |
| 土壤蔗糖酶 S-UC | 0.093 | -0.043 |
| 土壤脲酶 S-UE | 0.091 | 0.007 |
| 土壤碱性磷酸酶 S-ALP | 0.089 | -0.057 |
| 土壤过氧化氢酶 S-CAT | 0.088 | -0.065 |
| 特征值 Eiges value | 10.649 | 2.806 |
| 方差贡献率/% Proportion of variance | 70.993 | 18.704 |
| 累积方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance | 70.993 | 89.697 |
| 处理 Treatment | PC1(F1) | PC2(F2) | 综合得分(F) Composite score | 得分排名 Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | -1.26081 | 0.00682 | -0.893811 | 5 |
| TB | 0.75686 | 1.09501 | 0.742128 | 2 |
| TC | -0.38553 | 0.86549 | -0.111818 | 3 |
| TE | 1.24888 | -0.74213 | 0.747809 | 1 |
| TF | -0.3594 | -1.22518 | -0.484306 | 4 |
Table 4 Comprehensive scores and rankings of growth-promoting effects of different compound microbial inoculant formulations on onion
| 处理 Treatment | PC1(F1) | PC2(F2) | 综合得分(F) Composite score | 得分排名 Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | -1.26081 | 0.00682 | -0.893811 | 5 |
| TB | 0.75686 | 1.09501 | 0.742128 | 2 |
| TC | -0.38553 | 0.86549 | -0.111818 | 3 |
| TE | 1.24888 | -0.74213 | 0.747809 | 1 |
| TF | -0.3594 | -1.22518 | -0.484306 | 4 |
| [1] |
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379 URL |
| [2] |
doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00561-2 |
| [3] |
pmid: 15012221 |
| [4] |
doi: 10.3390/su13031140 URL |
| [5] |
doi: 10.1007/BF01225354 URL |
| [6] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135350 URL |
| [7] |
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040765 URL |
| [8] |
|
|
陈晓燕, 王小琳, 谢先进. 2021. 不同微生物菌剂对玉米产量及土壤肥力的影响. 热带农业科学, 41 (9):11-16.
|
|
| [9] |
|
|
成新艳, 凌梦, 邓流阳, 杜梦琳, 杨滢滢, 王陈, 陈珂. 2021. 低压直流电场对沙打旺生长及根系土壤酶活的影响. 湖北农业科学, 60 (8):102-106.
|
|
| [10] |
|
|
储成才, 王毅, 王二涛. 2021. 植物氮磷钾养分高效利用研究现状与展望. 中国科学(生命科学), 51 (10):1415-1423.
|
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127602 URL |
| [13] |
doi: 10.1139/w02-105 pmid: 12619819 |
| [14] |
|
|
耿士均, 刘刊, 商海燕, 权俊娇, 陆小平, 王波. 2012. 园艺作物连作障碍的研究进展. 北方园艺,(7):190-195.
|
|
| [15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 pmid: 20870416 |
| [16] |
doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2022.08.044 pmid: 37087191 |
| [17] |
doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1 pmid: 5655425 |
| [18] |
|
|
黄文, 郭竞, 刘慧超, 黄晓燕, 张舜, 应芳卿. 2022. 不同微生物菌剂对番茄产量及品质的影响. 中国瓜菜, 35 (8):75-78.
|
|
| [19] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0155 |
|
贾美惠, 黄帅, 张蔓蔓, 刘乾, 王晓兵, 张琪, 雷雅馨, 王静. 2026. 硝普钠对哈密瓜采后品质及活性氧代谢影响的研究. 园艺学报, 53(3):817-830.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0155 |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
doi: S0003-2670(19)31239-5 pmid: 31864629 |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
doi: 10.5897/AJMR URL |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202311.017 |
|
刘希港, 李楠, 季托, 周波, 魏珉, 李静, 杨凤娟. 2023. 微生物菌剂和玉米蛋白酵素对番茄叶片生理特性和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 34 (11):3039-3044.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202311.017 |
|
| [27] |
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54512-z pmid: 38514633 |
| [28] |
doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9 pmid: 12234732 |
| [29] |
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x pmid: 9919677 |
| [30] |
doi: 10.3390/su13041868 URL |
| [31] |
doi: 10.3390/biology12111416 URL |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
|
史伟杰, 高华山, 杨继锋, 姚吕富, 蔺玉军, 范凡. 2025. 微生物菌剂对张家口洋葱产量、品质和抗病性的影响. 农村经济与科技, 36 (7):60-62.
|
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
doi: 10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000743 |
|
孙杨, 王璐, 赵璐, 孟祥龙, 王亚南, 胡同乐, 曹克强, 王树桐. 2022. 复合微生物菌肥对苹果再植病害调控及对根围土壤真菌群落结构的影响. 植物病理学报, 52 (2):256-268.
doi: 10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000743 |
|
| [36] |
doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8500-8505.2005 pmid: 16332840 |
| [37] |
pmid: 27842515 |
| [38] |
|
|
王其传, 孙锦, 束胜, 李晶, 郭世荣, 祁红英, 陈月珍. 2012. 微生物菌剂对日光温室辣椒生长和光合特性的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 35 (6):7-12.
|
|
| [39] |
|
|
王归鹏, 马乐乐, 范兵华, 任瑞丹, 李建明. 2021. 微生物菌剂对番茄全有机营养栽培养分转化及产量品质的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 49 (9):118-128.
|
|
| [40] |
|
|
王欢, 王敬敬, 徐松, 赵维, 韩一凡, 王兴彪, 黄志勇. 2017. 有机磷降解菌的筛选及其促生特性. 微生物学报, 57 (5):667-680.
|
|
| [41] |
doi: 10.1111/pce.v47.11 URL |
| [42] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109171 URL |
| [43] |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01764 pmid: 29104577 |
| [44] |
|
|
吴恩彪. 2015. 微生物肥料对云烟87根系生长及其根际土壤细菌群落多样性影响[硕士论文]. 福州: 福建农林大学.
|
|
| [45] |
|
|
许世洋, 范雨轩, 汪学苗, 张怡忻, 柴继宽, 李建军, 李敏权, 漆永红, 李雪萍. 2022. 辣椒镰孢根腐病防病促生细菌的筛选及其效应. 微生物学报, 62 (7):2735-2750.
|
|
| [46] |
doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11248-4 |
| [47] |
|
|
闫国超, 樊小平, 谭礼, 尹昌, 梁永超. 2020. 盐胁迫下添加外源硅提高水稻抗氧化酶活性与钠钾平衡相关基因表达. 植物营养与肥料学报, 26 (11):1935-1943.
|
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00059 |
|
于彦琳, 师桂英, 张立彭, 史贵红, 李谋强, 苏国礼, 李潇潇. 2021. 硅肥和微生物菌剂配施对连作兰州百合(Lilium davidli var. unicolor)生长及土壤生化性质的影响. 中国沙漠, 41 (5):157-165.
doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00059 |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7853-0 pmid: 27834052 |
| [52] |
|
|
张宪政. 1986. 植物叶绿素含量测定-丙酮乙醇混合液法. 辽宁农业科学,(3):26-28.
|
|
| [53] |
|
|
周洋, 陈垣, 郭凤霞, 王红燕, 蔡子平. 2023. 立体牵引对有机栽培党参光合特性及产量和质量的影响. 中国中药杂志, 48 (10):2725-2731.
|
| [1] | LIU Chen, XUE Rui, LIU Xianxian, XU Wenling, CHANG Lichun, WEI Zihao, YANG Meng, WANG Shufen. Screening and Evaluation of Radish Cultivars Suitable for Pickling [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1301-1314. |
| [2] | ZHOU Jiaxu, LI Hongjian, ZHANG Xiumei, LI Chenghui, LIU Ying, YU Nianwen. Effect of Fruit Bag Color on Fruit Quality in‘Harlikar’Apples [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1395-1408. |
| [3] | LI Jie, TIAN Qihang, LIU Guojian, TIAN Zhendong, WANG Yu, WANG Zhaoyuan, CHANG Ruifeng, LI Yonghong. Influence of Cold Stress and Cold Resistance Evaluation on the Seedling Stage of Peach Cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1409-1424. |
| [4] | WANG Caihong, ZHANG Yangyong, LI Sen, ZHANG Chaowen, KONG Xiaoping, LÜ Honghao, WANG Yong, YANG Limei, JI Jialei, ZHUANG Mu. Identification of Black Spot Pathogen in Cabbage,Analysis of Biological Characteristics,and Screening of Resistant Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1502-1520. |
| [5] | XU Guochun, XU Yongqing, LI Huawei, JI Rongchang, LUO Wenbin, LIN Zhaomiao, QIU Sixin, TANG Hao. Screening of Potato Germplasms for Low Nitrogen Tolerance and Analysis of Nitrogen Efficiency [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(3): 775-790. |
| [6] | LI Jian, WANG Juntao, SHI Gensheng, HAO Huazheng, JI Zhongrui, XU Taoyu, WANG Jing, CHEN Lin. Comprehensive Evaluation on Cold Tolerance of Eleven Walnut Cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(1): 174-184. |
| [7] | WANG Jie, DONG Xiaoxu, CHEN Jinxiao, YU Xianmei, GAO Rui, AI Chengxiang, SHEN Guangning. Identification and Biological Characteristics of the Pathogen Causing Persimmon Leaf Blight and Toxicity Test of Different Fungicides [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 737-748. |
| [8] | QIAN Jingyang, LU Lili, LI Qin, TANG Yuhan, TAO Jun, ZHAO Daqiu. Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Traits for Chinese Herbaceous Peony Cultivar Resources [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 349-364. |
| [9] | GUO Ziyan, TANG Wen, XU Mengyu, LÜ Jinhan, FANG Jinggui, WANG Jiangbo, and LU Suwen. Association Between Vineyard Soil Factors and Fruit Quality:An Analysis of Cultivar Response Differences [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(11): 2943-2958. |
| [10] | GONG Xiaoya, LI Xian, ZHOU Xingang, WU Fengzhi. Effect of Rhizosphere Microorganisms Induced by Potato-Onion on Tomato Root-Knot Nematode Disease [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(8): 1913-1926. |
| [11] | ZHU Qixuan, LI Xiaoying, WU Junkai, GE Hang, CHEN Junwei, XU Hongxia. Genetic Tendency Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of the Fruit Traits in Loquat F1 Generation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1201-1215. |
| [12] | WANG Xiaolong, SHAO Xuedong, ZHANG Zhengwen, ZHONG Xiaomin, LIU Chang, WANG Zhiqiang, WANG Baoliang, JI Xiaohao, SHI Xiangbin, WANG Haibo. Correlation Analysis of Fruit Quality and the Nutrient Level in Plant and Soil of Wine Grape‘Merlot’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2575-2593. |
| [13] | LU Jianzeng, ZHOU Liyan, HUANG Xinyi, WU Fengzhi, GAO Danmei. Effects of Carbon Pool Strength on Plant Growth and Potassium Uptake of Tomato Intercropped with Potato-Onion [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2620-2632. |
| [14] | WU Yajie, JIAO Yu, WANG Hailong, CHEN Zhixing, PU Hao, ZHU Zihan, ZOU Qian, TANG Shukun, CAO Yanru. Screening Research and Comprehensive Evaluation of Rooting Agents for Chrysanthemum Cuttings [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2657-2667. |
| [15] | ZHANG Xi, ZHAO Qiuyan, GU Zhijia, HUANG Haiquan, YAN Bo, HUANG Meijuan. Studies on Pollen Micromorphology of Impatiens Plants in Southwest Sichuan [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(8): 1664-1678. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd