Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 1457-1476.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0190
• Cultivation · Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
XIA Qiuhao1,2,3, MA Zhihao1,2,3, LUO Langqin1,2,3, CHEN Tiancai1,2,3, JIN Qiang1,2,4, WANG Hongxia5, ZHANG Rui3,*(
), GUO Zhongzhong2,*(
)
Received:2025-08-13
Revised:2025-12-18
Online:2026-05-25
Published:2026-05-26
Contact:
ZHANG Rui, GUO Zhongzhong
XIA Qiuhao, MA Zhihao, LUO Langqin, CHEN Tiancai, JIN Qiang, WANG Hongxia, ZHANG Rui, GUO Zhongzhong. Estimation Model of Leaf Moisture Content in Walnut Canopy Based on Hyperspectral Technology[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1457-1476.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0190
| 生育期 Growth stage | 日期/(M-D) Date | 灌水次数Number of times watered | 灌水定额/(m3 · hm-2) Flooding quota | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | |||
| 萌芽期Sprout stage | 04-05—04-14 | 1 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 |
| 开花期Flowering stage | 04-15—05-09 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 果实膨大期Fruit swelling period | 05-10—06-02 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 硬核期Hardcore period | 06-03—07-05 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 油脂转化期Oil conversion period | 07-06—08-31 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 成熟期Maturation stage | 09-01—09-25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 冬灌Winter irrigation | 11-01—11-20 | 1 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 |
| 合计Summation | 10 | 9 000 | 5 250 | 6 000 | 7 500 | 8 250 | |
Table 1 Division of growth stages and irrigation system for walnut trees
| 生育期 Growth stage | 日期/(M-D) Date | 灌水次数Number of times watered | 灌水定额/(m3 · hm-2) Flooding quota | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | |||
| 萌芽期Sprout stage | 04-05—04-14 | 1 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 |
| 开花期Flowering stage | 04-15—05-09 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 果实膨大期Fruit swelling period | 05-10—06-02 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 硬核期Hardcore period | 06-03—07-05 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 油脂转化期Oil conversion period | 07-06—08-31 | 2 | 1 500 | 562.5 | 750 | 1 125 | 1 312.5 |
| 成熟期Maturation stage | 09-01—09-25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 冬灌Winter irrigation | 11-01—11-20 | 1 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 | 1 500 |
| 合计Summation | 10 | 9 000 | 5 250 | 6 000 | 7 500 | 8 250 | |
| 预处理方法简称 Preprocessing method abbreviation | 注释 Annotation | 参考文献 Reference |
|---|---|---|
| RAW | 原始数据 Raw data | 彭望琭, |
| MMS | 离差标准化 Deviation standardization | 李民赞, |
| Centered | 均值中心化 Mean centralization | 任东, |
| Z-Score | 标准化 Standardization | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| Parato | Pareto尺度化 Pareto scaling | 彭望琭, |
| normalize | 归一化 Normalization | 李民赞, |
| Average Moving | 移动平均 Moving average | 任东, |
| SG | 卷积平滑 Convolutional smoothing | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| MSC | 多元散射校正 Multivariate scattering correction | 彭望琭, |
| SNV | 标准正态变量变换 Standard normal variable transformation | 李民赞, |
| FD | 一阶微分求导 First order differential differentiation | 任东, |
| SD | 二阶微分求导 Derivative of second-order differential | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| Detrend | 去趋势 Detrend | 彭望琭, |
| SG + FD | 卷积平滑 + 一阶微分 Convolutional smoothing + First-order differentiation | 李民赞, |
| SG + SD | 卷积平滑 + 二阶微分 Convolutional smoothing + Second-order differentiation | 任东, |
| SG + MSC | 卷积平滑 + 多元散射校正 Convolutional smoothing + Multivariate scattering correction | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| SNV + FD | 标准正态变量变换 + 一阶微分 Standard normal variable transformation+First-order differentiation | 彭望琭, |
| SNV + SD | 标准正态变量变换 + 二阶微分 Standard normal variable transformation + Second-order differentiation | 李民赞, |
| SNV + Detrend | 标准正态变量变换 + 去趋势 Standard normal variable transformation + Detrended | 任东, |
| AM + MMS | 移动平均 + 离差标准化 Moving average + Deviation standardization | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| AM + Centered | 移动平均 + 均值中心化 Moving average + Mean centralization | 彭望琭, |
| AM + Parato | 移动平均 +Pareto尺度化 Moving average + Pareto scaling | 李民赞, |
Table 2 Performing 21 spectral transformations on raw data
| 预处理方法简称 Preprocessing method abbreviation | 注释 Annotation | 参考文献 Reference |
|---|---|---|
| RAW | 原始数据 Raw data | 彭望琭, |
| MMS | 离差标准化 Deviation standardization | 李民赞, |
| Centered | 均值中心化 Mean centralization | 任东, |
| Z-Score | 标准化 Standardization | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| Parato | Pareto尺度化 Pareto scaling | 彭望琭, |
| normalize | 归一化 Normalization | 李民赞, |
| Average Moving | 移动平均 Moving average | 任东, |
| SG | 卷积平滑 Convolutional smoothing | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| MSC | 多元散射校正 Multivariate scattering correction | 彭望琭, |
| SNV | 标准正态变量变换 Standard normal variable transformation | 李民赞, |
| FD | 一阶微分求导 First order differential differentiation | 任东, |
| SD | 二阶微分求导 Derivative of second-order differential | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| Detrend | 去趋势 Detrend | 彭望琭, |
| SG + FD | 卷积平滑 + 一阶微分 Convolutional smoothing + First-order differentiation | 李民赞, |
| SG + SD | 卷积平滑 + 二阶微分 Convolutional smoothing + Second-order differentiation | 任东, |
| SG + MSC | 卷积平滑 + 多元散射校正 Convolutional smoothing + Multivariate scattering correction | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| SNV + FD | 标准正态变量变换 + 一阶微分 Standard normal variable transformation+First-order differentiation | 彭望琭, |
| SNV + SD | 标准正态变量变换 + 二阶微分 Standard normal variable transformation + Second-order differentiation | 李民赞, |
| SNV + Detrend | 标准正态变量变换 + 去趋势 Standard normal variable transformation + Detrended | 任东, |
| AM + MMS | 移动平均 + 离差标准化 Moving average + Deviation standardization | 第五鹏瑶 等, |
| AM + Centered | 移动平均 + 均值中心化 Moving average + Mean centralization | 彭望琭, |
| AM + Parato | 移动平均 +Pareto尺度化 Moving average + Pareto scaling | 李民赞, |
Fig. 1 Leaf moisture content of walnuts fruits at different growth stages The irrigation quotas for the control,W1,W2,W3,and W4 are 9 000,5 250,6 000,7 500,and 8 250 m3 · hm-2,respectively
| 样本 Sample | 样本量 Sample size | 最大值/% Maximum value | 最小值/% Minimum value | 平均值/% Average value | 标准偏差/% Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 样本总量 Total sample size | 443 | 79.00 | 49.85 | 70.45 | 3.93 |
| 训练集 Training set | 354 | 79.00 | 55.63 | 68.76 | 3.96 |
| 测试集 Test set | 89 | 73.70 | 49.85 | 68.32 | 3.46 |
Table 3 Statistical data on leaf water content
| 样本 Sample | 样本量 Sample size | 最大值/% Maximum value | 最小值/% Minimum value | 平均值/% Average value | 标准偏差/% Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 样本总量 Total sample size | 443 | 79.00 | 49.85 | 70.45 | 3.93 |
| 训练集 Training set | 354 | 79.00 | 55.63 | 68.76 | 3.96 |
| 测试集 Test set | 89 | 73.70 | 49.85 | 68.32 | 3.46 |
Fig. 3 Correlation coefficient between 21 original spectral preprocessing methods and leaf moisture content Each preprocessing method is detailed in Table 2
Fig. 4 Spectral data of walnut leaves with different pretreatments at‘Wen 185’walnut A:Raw spectrogram;B:First derivative pre-processing(FD);C:Detrend preprocessing;D:Convolutional smoothing combined with first-order derivative preprocessing(SG + FD);E:First derivative and standard normal variation combination preprocessing (SNV + FD);F:Standard normal variation and detrend combination preprocessing(SNV + Detrend)
Fig. 5 The wavelength variable selection process of different preprocessing CARS algorithms a:Trend of changes in the number of variables;b:RMSECV value change trend;c:The trend of regression coefficient values for each variable
| 预处理 Pretreatment | 不同算法提取的敏感特征波段数 Number of sensitive feature bands extracted by different algorithms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARS | UVE | SPA | BPSO | |
| RAW | 108 | 1 469 | 52 | 1 125 |
| FD | 40 | 1 845 | 67 | 1 097 |
| Detrend | 46 | 1 482 | 116 | 1 054 |
| SG + FD | 40 | 1 845 | 56 | 1 087 |
| SNV + FD | 40 | 1 840 | 40 | 1 226 |
| SNV + Detrend | 46 | 742 | 77 | 1 099 |
Table 4 Different algorithms for extracting sensitive feature wavelengths from spectral samples
| 预处理 Pretreatment | 不同算法提取的敏感特征波段数 Number of sensitive feature bands extracted by different algorithms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARS | UVE | SPA | BPSO | |
| RAW | 108 | 1 469 | 52 | 1 125 |
| FD | 40 | 1 845 | 67 | 1 097 |
| Detrend | 46 | 1 482 | 116 | 1 054 |
| SG + FD | 40 | 1 845 | 56 | 1 087 |
| SNV + FD | 40 | 1 840 | 40 | 1 226 |
| SNV + Detrend | 46 | 742 | 77 | 1 099 |
Fig. 7 Principle of extracting feature wavelength from different preprocessed UVE A,C,E,G,I,K:During the screening process of each preprocessing band,the regression coefficients of each variable are obtained by adding white noise variables and using the PLS model cross leave one method,Two horizontal lines represent the upper and lower threshold lines filtered by UVE variables. B,D,F,H,J,L:Screening results of feature bands extracted by each preprocessing
Fig. 8 Feature wavelength results extracted from different preprocessed SPA A,C,E,G,I,and K are the screening processes for each preprocessing band,representing the number of variables selected by the SPA multiple linear regression model. The red square represents the number of variables,and the average standard deviation of the prediction is the smallest at this time;B,D,F,H,J,and L are the filtering results of each preprocessing band,where the red square marks the feature bands extracted through SPA(Continuous Projection Algorithm)
Fig. 9 Principle of extracting feature wavelength from different preprocessed BPSO A,C,E,G,I,K are the screening processes for each preprocessing band;B,D,F,H,J,L are the screening results of each preprocessing band; The change in fitness curve is directly proportional to the screening error. As the number of iterations increases,the fitness curve shows a downward trend,and the model error also decreases. When the error drops to the lowest value,the selected feature wavelength is the optimal feature wavelength
| 特征波段 Feature bands | 预处理方法 Preprocessing method | 训练集 Training set | 测试集 Test set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | RMSE | RPD | R | RMSE | RPD | ||
| BPSO | RAW | 0.610 | 3.176 | 1.604 | 0.605 | 2.293 | 1.601 |
| FD | 0.659 | 2.946 | 1.714 | 0.689 | 2.126 | 1.803 | |
| Detrend | 0.623 | 3.137 | 1.630 | 0.618 | 2.180 | 1.627 | |
| SG + FD | 0.658 | 3.005 | 1.711 | 0.660 | 1.962 | 1.726 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.657 | 2.971 | 1.710 | 0.625 | 2.243 | 1.642 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.619 | 3.129 | 1.623 | 0.563 | 2.465 | 1.522 | |
| CARS | RAW | 0.603 | 3.206 | 1.589 | 0.523 | 2.537 | 1.457 |
| FD | 0.651 | 3.009 | 1.695 | 0.761 | 1.774 | 2.055 | |
| Detrend | 0.535 | 3.438 | 1.469 | 0.610 | 2.394 | 1.611 | |
| SG + FD | 0.649 | 3.016 | 1.689 | 0.668 | 2.057 | 1.745 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.614 | 3.179 | 1.611 | 0.685 | 1.959 | 1.793 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.534 | 3.445 | 1.468 | 0.572 | 2.499 | 1.538 | |
| SPA | RAW | 0.596 | 3.236 | 1.576 | 0.543 | 2.376 | 1.488 |
| FD | 0.682 | 2.873 | 1.775 | 0.650 | 2.083 | 1.701 | |
| Detrend | 0.622 | 3.147 | 1.629 | 0.533 | 2.322 | 1.472 | |
| SG + FD | 0.677 | 2.910 | 1.762 | 0.790 | 1.594 | 2.194 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.684 | 2.890 | 1.780 | 0.570 | 2.209 | 1.534 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.639 | 3.051 | 1.668 | 0.615 | 2.271 | 1.622 | |
| UVE | RAW | 0.627 | 3.085 | 1.640 | 0.555 | 2.567 | 1.508 |
| FD | 0.663 | 2.965 | 1.724 | 0.678 | 2.002 | 1.772 | |
| Detrend | 0.594 | 3.185 | 1.571 | 0.574 | 2.616 | 1.542 | |
| SG + FD | 0.683 | 2.872 | 1.778 | 0.695 | 1.945 | 1.822 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.672 | 2.932 | 1.750 | 0.635 | 2.089 | 1.666 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.607 | 3.181 | 1.596 | 0.666 | 2.166 | 1.740 | |
Table 5 Establishment of RF models based on different preprocessing methods
| 特征波段 Feature bands | 预处理方法 Preprocessing method | 训练集 Training set | 测试集 Test set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | RMSE | RPD | R | RMSE | RPD | ||
| BPSO | RAW | 0.610 | 3.176 | 1.604 | 0.605 | 2.293 | 1.601 |
| FD | 0.659 | 2.946 | 1.714 | 0.689 | 2.126 | 1.803 | |
| Detrend | 0.623 | 3.137 | 1.630 | 0.618 | 2.180 | 1.627 | |
| SG + FD | 0.658 | 3.005 | 1.711 | 0.660 | 1.962 | 1.726 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.657 | 2.971 | 1.710 | 0.625 | 2.243 | 1.642 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.619 | 3.129 | 1.623 | 0.563 | 2.465 | 1.522 | |
| CARS | RAW | 0.603 | 3.206 | 1.589 | 0.523 | 2.537 | 1.457 |
| FD | 0.651 | 3.009 | 1.695 | 0.761 | 1.774 | 2.055 | |
| Detrend | 0.535 | 3.438 | 1.469 | 0.610 | 2.394 | 1.611 | |
| SG + FD | 0.649 | 3.016 | 1.689 | 0.668 | 2.057 | 1.745 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.614 | 3.179 | 1.611 | 0.685 | 1.959 | 1.793 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.534 | 3.445 | 1.468 | 0.572 | 2.499 | 1.538 | |
| SPA | RAW | 0.596 | 3.236 | 1.576 | 0.543 | 2.376 | 1.488 |
| FD | 0.682 | 2.873 | 1.775 | 0.650 | 2.083 | 1.701 | |
| Detrend | 0.622 | 3.147 | 1.629 | 0.533 | 2.322 | 1.472 | |
| SG + FD | 0.677 | 2.910 | 1.762 | 0.790 | 1.594 | 2.194 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.684 | 2.890 | 1.780 | 0.570 | 2.209 | 1.534 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.639 | 3.051 | 1.668 | 0.615 | 2.271 | 1.622 | |
| UVE | RAW | 0.627 | 3.085 | 1.640 | 0.555 | 2.567 | 1.508 |
| FD | 0.663 | 2.965 | 1.724 | 0.678 | 2.002 | 1.772 | |
| Detrend | 0.594 | 3.185 | 1.571 | 0.574 | 2.616 | 1.542 | |
| SG + FD | 0.683 | 2.872 | 1.778 | 0.695 | 1.945 | 1.822 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.672 | 2.932 | 1.750 | 0.635 | 2.089 | 1.666 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.607 | 3.181 | 1.596 | 0.666 | 2.166 | 1.740 | |
| 特征波段 Feature bands | 预处理方法 Preprocessing method | 训练集 Training set | 测试集 Test set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | RMSE | RPD | R | RMSE | RPD | ||
| BPSO | RAW | 0.898 | 1.620 | 3.138 | 0.813 | 1.605 | 2.327 |
| FD | 0.899 | 1.626 | 3.158 | 0.727 | 1.788 | 1.926 | |
| Detrend | 0.896 | 1.645 | 3.100 | 0.781 | 1.702 | 2.151 | |
| SG + FD | 0.898 | 1.617 | 3.137 | 0.755 | 1.871 | 2.032 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.893 | 1.656 | 3.065 | 0.791 | 1.718 | 2.198 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.899 | 1.626 | 3.158 | 0.727 | 1.788 | 1.926 | |
| CARS | RAW | 0.906 | 1.568 | 3.266 | 0.811 | 1.518 | 2.316 |
| FD | 0.909 | 1.515 | 3.323 | 0.813 | 1.675 | 2.328 | |
| Detrend | 0.905 | 1.571 | 3.248 | 0.801 | 1.612 | 2.255 | |
| SG + FD | 0.911 | 1.529 | 3.350 | 0.770 | 1.666 | 2.098 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.913 | 1.475 | 3.395 | 0.800 | 1.841 | 2.247 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.907 | 1.549 | 3.287 | 0.764 | 1.775 | 2.070 | |
| SPA | RAW | 0.897 | 1.621 | 3.114 | 0.819 | 1.863 | 2.363 |
| FD | 0.899 | 1.609 | 3.158 | 0.793 | 1.678 | 2.209 | |
| Detrend | 0.894 | 1.663 | 3.077 | 0.686 | 1.936 | 1.793 | |
| SG + FD | 0.913 | 1.513 | 3.390 | 0.772 | 1.645 | 2.108 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.907 | 1.547 | 3.286 | 0.733 | 1.924 | 1.946 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.906 | 1.549 | 3.274 | 0.705 | 2.048 | 1.852 | |
| UVE | RAW | 0.885 | 1.716 | 2.955 | 0.735 | 1.954 | 1.953 |
| FD | 0.888 | 1.708 | 2.988 | 0.757 | 1.759 | 2.038 | |
| Detrend | 0.909 | 1.534 | 3.316 | 0.756 | 1.830 | 2.037 | |
| SG + FD | 0.907 | 1.531 | 3.281 | 0.712 | 2.160 | 1.875 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.898 | 1.641 | 3.133 | 0.696 | 1.873 | 1.825 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.898 | 1.652 | 3.141 | 0.682 | 1.728 | 1.782 | |
Table 6 Establishment of ELM models based on different preprocessing methods
| 特征波段 Feature bands | 预处理方法 Preprocessing method | 训练集 Training set | 测试集 Test set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | RMSE | RPD | R | RMSE | RPD | ||
| BPSO | RAW | 0.898 | 1.620 | 3.138 | 0.813 | 1.605 | 2.327 |
| FD | 0.899 | 1.626 | 3.158 | 0.727 | 1.788 | 1.926 | |
| Detrend | 0.896 | 1.645 | 3.100 | 0.781 | 1.702 | 2.151 | |
| SG + FD | 0.898 | 1.617 | 3.137 | 0.755 | 1.871 | 2.032 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.893 | 1.656 | 3.065 | 0.791 | 1.718 | 2.198 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.899 | 1.626 | 3.158 | 0.727 | 1.788 | 1.926 | |
| CARS | RAW | 0.906 | 1.568 | 3.266 | 0.811 | 1.518 | 2.316 |
| FD | 0.909 | 1.515 | 3.323 | 0.813 | 1.675 | 2.328 | |
| Detrend | 0.905 | 1.571 | 3.248 | 0.801 | 1.612 | 2.255 | |
| SG + FD | 0.911 | 1.529 | 3.350 | 0.770 | 1.666 | 2.098 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.913 | 1.475 | 3.395 | 0.800 | 1.841 | 2.247 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.907 | 1.549 | 3.287 | 0.764 | 1.775 | 2.070 | |
| SPA | RAW | 0.897 | 1.621 | 3.114 | 0.819 | 1.863 | 2.363 |
| FD | 0.899 | 1.609 | 3.158 | 0.793 | 1.678 | 2.209 | |
| Detrend | 0.894 | 1.663 | 3.077 | 0.686 | 1.936 | 1.793 | |
| SG + FD | 0.913 | 1.513 | 3.390 | 0.772 | 1.645 | 2.108 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.907 | 1.547 | 3.286 | 0.733 | 1.924 | 1.946 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.906 | 1.549 | 3.274 | 0.705 | 2.048 | 1.852 | |
| UVE | RAW | 0.885 | 1.716 | 2.955 | 0.735 | 1.954 | 1.953 |
| FD | 0.888 | 1.708 | 2.988 | 0.757 | 1.759 | 2.038 | |
| Detrend | 0.909 | 1.534 | 3.316 | 0.756 | 1.830 | 2.037 | |
| SG + FD | 0.907 | 1.531 | 3.281 | 0.712 | 2.160 | 1.875 | |
| FD + SNV | 0.898 | 1.641 | 3.133 | 0.696 | 1.873 | 1.825 | |
| SNV + Detrend | 0.898 | 1.652 | 3.141 | 0.682 | 1.728 | 1.782 | |
| [1] |
|
|
陈天财. 2023. 基于高光谱遥感的核桃叶片水分含量估测研究[硕士论文]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学.
|
|
| [2] |
|
|
代秋芳, 廖臣龙, 李震, 宋淑然, 薛秀云, 熊诗路. 2022. 基于CARS-CNN的高光谱柑橘叶片含水率可视化研究. 光谱学与光谱分析, 42 (9):2848-2854.
|
|
| [3] |
doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)09-2800-07 |
|
第五鹏瑶, 卞希慧, 王姿方, 刘巍. 2019. 光谱预处理方法选择研究. 光谱学与光谱分析,(9):2800-2806.
|
|
| [4] |
|
|
郭阳, 郭俊先, 史勇, 李雪莲, 黄华, 刘彦岑. 2022. SiPLS-CARS与GA-ELM对哈密瓜冠层叶片含水率的反演估测. 光谱学与光谱分析, 42 (8):2565-2571.
|
|
| [5] |
Habure,
|
|
哈布热, 张宝忠, 李思恩, 彭致功, 韩娜娜, 刘露. 2018. 基于冠层光谱特征的冬小麦植株含水率诊断研究. 灌溉排水学报, 37 (10):9-15.
|
|
| [6] |
|
|
胡珍珠, 潘存德, 潘鑫, 朱白雪. 2016. 基于光谱水分指数的核桃叶片含水量估算模型. 林业科学, 52 (12):39-49.
|
|
| [7] |
|
|
霍迎秋, 凌晨东, 孙江昊, 蔡嘉甜, 胡少军. 2024. 基于高光谱的猕猴桃叶片叶绿素含量智能检测研究. 中国农机化学报, 45 (12):154-161.
|
|
| [8] |
|
|
李民赞. 2006. 光谱分析技术及其应用. 北京: 科学出版社.
|
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
|
李永梅, 王浩, 赵红莉, 张立根, 张鹏程. 2024. 基于高光谱变换的枸杞冠层含水率预测模型. 中国农机化学报, 45 (11):165-171,188.
|
|
| [11] |
|
|
刘康康, 钟浩, 林文树. 2024. 基于不同机器学习算法的无人机高光谱影像树种分类研究. 森林工程, 40 (4):98-108.
|
|
| [12] |
|
|
刘子涵, 李明, 赵峙尧, 陈谦, 李佳利, 于家斌, 钱建平. 2024. 基于高光谱成像技术和机器学习的猕猴桃果实可溶性固形物含量预测. 果树学报, 41 (12):2606-2620.
|
|
| [13] |
|
|
罗浪琴. 2023. 基于近红外光谱技术对核桃仁可溶性蛋白、脂肪和单宁含量检测研究[硕士论文]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学.
|
|
| [14] |
|
|
马玲, 李亚娇, 张祎洋, 王静, 马燕, 马思艳, 吴龙国. 2024. 基于高光谱成像技术的番茄叶片含水量检测研究. 南京农业大学学报, 47 (6):1221-1229.
|
|
| [15] |
|
|
马治浩. 2024. 微喷灌在核桃树体上的应用及叶片水分含量检测研究[硕士论文]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学.
|
|
| [16] |
|
|
孟露, 张捷, 杨甜, 吴龙国. 2022. 基于高光谱成像技术的番茄叶片叶绿素含量可视化分布研究. 湖北农业科学, 61 (14):171-177.
|
|
| [17] |
|
|
牟多铎, 刘磊. 2019. ELM与SVM在高光谱遥感图像监督分类中的比较研究. 遥感技术与应用, 34 (1):115-124.
|
|
| [18] |
|
|
潘庆梅, 张劲松, 张俊佩, 孟平, 汪贵斌, 杨洪国, 王鑫梅, 原文文, 周宇. 2019. 不同品种核桃叶片含水量与高光谱反射率的相关性差异分析. 林业科学研究, 32 (6):1-6.
|
|
| [19] |
|
|
彭望琭. 2002. 遥感概论. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
|
|
| [20] |
|
|
任东. 2017. 近红外光谱分析与应用. 北京: 科学出版社.
|
|
| [21] |
|
|
王敬湧, 张明珍, 凌华荣, 王梓延, 盖倞尧. 2023. 干旱胁迫下玉米叶片叶绿素含量与含水量高光谱成像反演方法. 智慧农业(中英文), 5 (3):142-153.
|
|
| [22] |
|
|
王松磊, 吴龙国, 王彩霞, 何建国. 2019. 可见近红外高光谱快速诊断番茄叶片含水量及其分布. 光电子激光, 30 (9):941-950.
|
|
| [23] |
|
|
王涛, 白铁成, 喻彩丽, 张楠楠, 王莎莎. 2018. SPA-PLS和GA-PLS算法预测胡杨叶片含水量的对比. 江苏农业科学, 46 (19):269-272.
|
|
| [24] |
|
|
王涛, 白铁成, 朱彩蝶, 高贤强, 邬欢欢. 2020. 基于近红外光谱多种预处理的胡杨叶片含水量预测对比. 西北林学院学报, 35 (5):173-179.
|
|
| [25] |
|
|
吴剑飞. 2021. 基于CARS-PLSR的冬小麦叶片含水量快速无损检测研究. 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版), 37 (7):22-26.
|
|
| [26] |
|
|
徐金明, 张孟喜, 丁涛. 2005. MATLAB实用教程. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
|
|
| [27] |
|
|
许童羽, 金忠煜, 郭忠辉, 杨柳, 白驹驰, 冯帅, 于丰华. 2022. 基于CARS-RUN-ELM算法的水稻叶片氮磷含量协同反演方法. 农业工程学报, 38 (10):148-155.
|
|
| [28] |
|
|
张立秀. 2023. 基于高光谱成像技术的久保桃品质检测及分级系统研究[硕士论文]. 太原: 山西农业大学.
|
|
| [29] |
|
|
张立秀, 张淑娟, 孙海霞, 薛建新, 景建平, 崔添俞. 2024. 高光谱结合离散二进制粒子群算法对久保桃可溶性固形物含量的检测. 光谱学与光谱分析, 44 (3):656-662.
|
| [1] | HUANG Minmin, NING Wanjun, ZHANG Yi, WANG Baoqing, MAHEMUTI · Abulaiti, ADILAI · Maimaiti, ZHANG Qiang. A New Walnut Cultivar‘Mobao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 69-70. |
| [2] | LI Weifen, ZHAO Dandan, LIU Fawan, FANG Chenggang, GUI Min, ZHANG Liqin, FENG Pengfei, CHEN Guofa, WU Zhen, LI Yinchuan, ZHOU Shan, DU Lei, ZHANG Ruihao, HU Huaran, ZHONG Qiuyue, WANG Renxiong, GAO Ye, DENG Zhengkui. A New Purple Leaf Mustard Cultivar‘Yunzijie 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 123-124. |
| [3] | LI Shushun, YAN Kunyuan, ZHU Lu, MA Qiuyue, DU Yiming, LI Rui, LI Qianzhong. A New Acer palmatum Cultivar‘Hongyun’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 293-294. |
| [4] | LIN Changli, FANG Ru, YANG Shaozong. A New Acer elegantulum Cultivar‘Yunxiali’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 295-296. |
| [5] | DUAN Linyuan, ZHANG Bo, QIN Ken, DAI Guoli, HUANG Ting, HE Xinru, ZHOU Xuan. A New Leafy Wolfberry Cultivar‘Ningqicai 4’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 339-340. |
| [6] | YANG Shaozong, LIN Changli, FANG Ru. A New Taxus wallichiana var. mairei Cultivar‘Yunlin Huangjingshan 4’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 359-361. |
| [7] | XU Huinan, GAO Mengjie, QI Kaijie, CUI Yanbo, WU Xiao, TAO Shutian, ZHANG Shaoling, YIN Hao. Phenotypic Diversity Evaluation of Shoots and Leaves in 264 Pear Germplasm Accessions [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1237-1252. |
| [8] | TANG Yu, ZENG Meiyin, ZHU Pengkai, HE Tianyou, ZHENG Yushan, CHEN Lingyan. Effects of SA-OPDA Crosstalk on the Antioxidant System of Striped Leaves in Sinobambusa tootsik f. albostriata [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1477-1490. |
| [9] | WU Chengxu, NIE Ruining, JI Xinying, TANG Jiajia, LI Ao, ZHENG Xu, ZHANG Junpei. Non-Targeted Metabolomics Reveals Hormonal Responses in Walnut Roots Mediated by Two Mycorrhizal Fungi Under Salt Stress [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(4): 1057-1072. |
| [10] | HUANG Xinran, WANG Rongbo, ZHANG Qianrong, LI Benjin, WENG Qiyong, LIU Peiqing. Development and Implementation of an Efficient Method for Evaluating Tomato Resistance to Bacterial Wilt Based on Leaf Injection [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(4): 1215-1225. |
| [11] | WANG Jiali, LIU Huixin, YUE Kangjie, KANG Hongwei, QIAO Ke, TIAN Xuping. Establishment of the Tissue Culture System of Sabina chinensis [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(3): 867-880. |
| [12] | LI Jian, WANG Juntao, SHI Gensheng, HAO Huazheng, JI Zhongrui, XU Taoyu, WANG Jing, CHEN Lin. Comprehensive Evaluation on Cold Tolerance of Eleven Walnut Cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(1): 174-184. |
| [13] | LI Xiuzhen, PENG Xiu, FENG Dalan, TANG Yunbo, ZHOU Xiangbo, TANG Jiajia. A New Improved Walnut Cultivar‘Yulu’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 59-60. |
| [14] | LIU Feng, LIANG Dejun, HE Youchao, WANG Cheng, LI Dongsheng, MA Ruifeng, ZHENG Xiang, SHAO Yi, XIA Junxia, ZHANG Junpei, ZHAO Baojun. A New Walnut Cultivar‘Liaobaoyan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 61-62. |
| [15] | WANG Guifang, XIANG Kun, XU Haifeng, ZHANG Meiyong, CHEN Xin. A New Walnut Cultivar‘Lukang 9’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 63-64. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd