园艺学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (7): 1547-1562.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0256
陈敏1,2, 吴天利2, 吕远达2,3, 姜波2, 闫化学3, 李娟1,*(), 钟云2,*(
)
收稿日期:
2023-02-07
修回日期:
2023-04-02
出版日期:
2023-07-25
发布日期:
2023-07-26
通讯作者:
基金资助:
CHEN Min1,2, WU Tianli2, Lü Yuanda2,3, JIANG Bo2, YAN Huaxue3, LI Juan1,*(), ZHONG Yun2,*(
)
Received:
2023-02-07
Revised:
2023-04-02
Published:
2023-07-25
Online:
2023-07-26
摘要:
从生长、生理和果实品质等多角度评价资阳香橙(Citrus junons Sieb. ex Tanaka)、卡里佐枳橙(C. sinensis × Poncirus trifoliata)、枳[P. trifoliata(L.)Raf.]和飞龙枳(P. trifoliata var. monstrosa)对红江橙的影响,为筛选网室容器栽培柑橘优良砧木提供依据。试验结果表明,资阳香橙砧的嫁接成活率、根系发育、单叶质量和单果质量均显著高于其他砧木的,嫁接口愈合完全,但果实品质略差;卡里佐枳橙砧的树势最强,枝皮率极低,初果期果实品质优,表现为果面光滑、沟纹少,果肉可溶性固形物、总糖显著高于其他砧木的,固酸比、总黄酮及氨基酸含量均显著高于资阳香橙砧的;飞龙枳和枳砧的嫁接成活率低,树势弱,嫁接口愈合不完全,根系发育缓慢。故容器栽培卡里佐枳橙砧与红江橙组合综合表现最佳。相关性分析表明,嫁接成活率、树势与嫁接口的生长素/脱落酸(IAA/ABA)、赤霉素/脱落酸(GA3/ABA)、生长素/细胞分裂素(IAA/ZR)呈正相关;穗砧茎粗比与嫁接口处ZR、ABA及ZR/ABA呈显著负相关;树势与接穗枝皮率、叶片ABA水平、IAA/GA3呈显著负相关,与叶片含水量、氮、钾、锌元素显著负相关,但与叶片ZR/ABA显著正相关;根系生长量与ZR、BR、ABA呈负相关,与IAA/ZR、IAA/GA3呈正相关。以上结果说明,激素互作在不同砧穗组合的嫁接亲和性、树势和根系发育等方面发挥着重要作用。
陈敏, 吴天利, 吕远达, 姜波, 闫化学, 李娟, 钟云. 不同砧木红江橙容器栽培生长和果实品质分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(7): 1547-1562.
CHEN Min, WU Tianli, Lü Yuanda, JIANG Bo, YAN Huaxue, LI Juan, ZHONG Yun. Analysis on Growth,Physiology and Fruit Quality of‘Hongjiang’Orange Grafted with Different Rootstocks Under Container Culture[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1547-1562.
图1 不同砧木红江橙的嫁接成活率 邓肯氏多重比较,不同字母表示差异显著(P < 0.05)。下同。
Fig. 1 The survival rate of Hongjiang orange seedlings grafted with different rootstocks Different letters indicate significant difference by Duncan’s multiple comparisons(P < 0.05). The same below.
图3 资阳香橙(A、B)、卡里佐枳橙(C、D)、枳(E、F)和飞龙枳(G、H)砧木红江橙嫁接部位形态(嫁接8个月)
Fig. 3 Morphology in grafting union of Hongjiang orange grafted with Ziyang Xiangcheng(A,B),Carrizo citrange(C,D),Trifoliate orange(E,F)and Flying Dragon(G,H)rootstocks(eight months after grafting)
砧木 Rootstock | 茎 Stem | 根 Root | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
接穗枝皮率/% Proportions of scion bark | 砧木枝皮率/% Proportions of stock bark | 穗砧茎粗比 Scion to stock trunk diam ratio | 根皮率/% Proportions of root bark | 总长/m Length | 干质量/g Dry weight | 表面积/cm2 Surface area | 平均直径/mm Average diameter | 体积/cm3 Volume | |||
资阳香橙 Ziyang Xiangcheng | 18.9 ± 1.6 b | 14.1 ± 0.3 a | 0.7 ± 0.1 a | 23.7 ± 3.3 ab | 754 ± 270 a | 191 ± 43 a | 17 546 ± 6 610 a | 28 ± 8 a | 329 ± 129 a | ||
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 14.3 ± 0.4 b | 7.2 ± 0.1 b | 0.7 ± 0.0 a | 13.0 ± 1.6 b | 356 ± 50 ab | 99 ± 13 b | 7 394 ± 1 027 ab | 11 ± 1 b | 126 ± 18 b | ||
枳 Trifoliate orange | 26.6 ± 2.1 a | 13.6 ± 2.0 a | 0.7 ± 0.0 a | 30.9 ± 6.5 a | 269 ± 46 b | 40 ± 5 b | 4 420 ± 615 b | 7 ± 1 b | 60 ± 6 b | ||
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 28.5 ± 2.5 a | 11.7 ± 0.3 a | 0.5 ± 0.1 b | 25.7 ± 7.0 ab | 303 ± 109 ab | 48 ± 9 b | 5 507 ± 2 045 b | 7 ± 2 b | 81 ± 31 b |
表1 不同砧木与红江橙组合茎和根系性状
Table 1 Root and stem characteristics of different scion-rootstock combinations
砧木 Rootstock | 茎 Stem | 根 Root | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
接穗枝皮率/% Proportions of scion bark | 砧木枝皮率/% Proportions of stock bark | 穗砧茎粗比 Scion to stock trunk diam ratio | 根皮率/% Proportions of root bark | 总长/m Length | 干质量/g Dry weight | 表面积/cm2 Surface area | 平均直径/mm Average diameter | 体积/cm3 Volume | |||
资阳香橙 Ziyang Xiangcheng | 18.9 ± 1.6 b | 14.1 ± 0.3 a | 0.7 ± 0.1 a | 23.7 ± 3.3 ab | 754 ± 270 a | 191 ± 43 a | 17 546 ± 6 610 a | 28 ± 8 a | 329 ± 129 a | ||
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 14.3 ± 0.4 b | 7.2 ± 0.1 b | 0.7 ± 0.0 a | 13.0 ± 1.6 b | 356 ± 50 ab | 99 ± 13 b | 7 394 ± 1 027 ab | 11 ± 1 b | 126 ± 18 b | ||
枳 Trifoliate orange | 26.6 ± 2.1 a | 13.6 ± 2.0 a | 0.7 ± 0.0 a | 30.9 ± 6.5 a | 269 ± 46 b | 40 ± 5 b | 4 420 ± 615 b | 7 ± 1 b | 60 ± 6 b | ||
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 28.5 ± 2.5 a | 11.7 ± 0.3 a | 0.5 ± 0.1 b | 25.7 ± 7.0 ab | 303 ± 109 ab | 48 ± 9 b | 5 507 ± 2 045 b | 7 ± 2 b | 81 ± 31 b |
生长指标 Growth index | 成活率 Grafting survival rate | 接穗长 Shoot length | 接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 接穗枝皮率 Proportions of scion bark | 砧木枝皮率 Proportions of rootstock bark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
接穗长Shoot length | 0.893 | ||||
接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 0.970* | 0.972* | |||
接穗枝皮率Proportions of scion bark | -0.883 | -0.975* | -0.940 | ||
砧木枝皮率Proportions of rootstock bark | -0.123 | -0.520 | -0.309 | 0.573 | |
穗砧茎粗比Scion to stock trunk diam ratio | 0.823 | 0.616 | 0.704 | -0.727 | -0.059 |
表2 不同砧木红江橙植株生长指标的相关系数
Table 2 Correlation coefficient of growth index for Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks
生长指标 Growth index | 成活率 Grafting survival rate | 接穗长 Shoot length | 接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 接穗枝皮率 Proportions of scion bark | 砧木枝皮率 Proportions of rootstock bark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
接穗长Shoot length | 0.893 | ||||
接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 0.970* | 0.972* | |||
接穗枝皮率Proportions of scion bark | -0.883 | -0.975* | -0.940 | ||
砧木枝皮率Proportions of rootstock bark | -0.123 | -0.520 | -0.309 | 0.573 | |
穗砧茎粗比Scion to stock trunk diam ratio | 0.823 | 0.616 | 0.704 | -0.727 | -0.059 |
图4 不同砧木红江橙叶、根、嫁接口的激素含量(嫁接8个月)
Fig. 4 Hormone contents in leaf,root and grafting union of Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks(eight months after grafting)
器官 Organ | 激素 Hormone | 成活率 Grafting survival rate | 接穗长 Shoot length | 接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 接穗枝皮率 Proportions of scion bark | 砧木枝皮率 Proportions of rootstock bark | 穗砧茎粗比 Scion to stock trunk diam ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | IAA | -0.863 | -0.820 | -0.831 | 0.916 | 0.402 | -0.929 |
GA3 | 0.211 | 0.277 | 0.313 | -0.059 | 0.174 | -0.359 | |
ZR | 0.752 | 0.855 | 0.792 | -0.946 | -0.667 | 0.773 | |
BR | -0.377 | -0.390 | -0.335 | 0.583 | 0.517 | -0.741 | |
ABA | -0.905 | -0.963* | -0.975* | 0.887 | 0.324 | -0.529 | |
嫁接口 | IAA | 0.799 | 0.923 | 0.909 | -0.816 | -0.371 | 0.344 |
Graft union | GA3 | 0.855 | 0.928 | 0.939 | -0.826 | -0.292 | 0.422 |
ZR | -0.835 | -0.651 | -0.728 | 0.761 | 0.112 | -0.998** | |
BR | 0.613 | 0.583 | 0.663 | -0.402 | 0.165 | 0.090 | |
ABA | -0.942 | -0.770 | -0.858 | 0.831 | 0.089 | -0.966* | |
叶片 | IAA/ABA | -0.755 | -0.691 | -0.699 | 0.826 | 0.386 | -0.941 |
Leaf | GA3/ABA | 0.382 | 0.489 | 0.503 | -0.284 | -0.004 | -0.206 |
BR/ABA | -0.224 | -0.137 | -0.123 | 0.351 | 0.282 | -0.706 | |
ZR/ABA | 0.947 | 0.964* | 0.969* | -0.986* | -0.428 | 0.802 | |
IAA/GA3 | -0.838 | -0.972* | -9.440 | 0.897 | 0.465 | -0.445 | |
IAA/ZR | -0.858 | -0.725 | -0.778 | 0.831 | 0.223 | -0.984* | |
嫁接口 Graft union | IAA/ABA | 0.942 | 0.939 | 0.981* | -0.866 | -0.213 | 0.590 |
GA3/ABA | 0.983* | 0.933 | 0.991** | -0.889 | -0.178 | 0.709 | |
BR/ABA | 0.883 | 0.765 | 0.874 | -0.656 | 0.123 | 0.506 | |
ZR/ABA | -0.836 | -0.666 | -0.736 | 0.778 | 0.145 | -0.996** | |
IAA/GA3 | 0.149 | 0.282 | 0.282 | -0.064 | 0.050 | -0.433 | |
IAA/ZR | 0.997** | 0.924 | 0.985* | -0.912 | -0.191 | 0.801 |
表3 不同砧木红江橙叶片、嫁接口的激素含量/比值与植株生长指标的相关系数(r)
Table 3 Correlation coefficient between hormone content/ratio of leaves and grafting union and plant growth index of Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks
器官 Organ | 激素 Hormone | 成活率 Grafting survival rate | 接穗长 Shoot length | 接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 接穗枝皮率 Proportions of scion bark | 砧木枝皮率 Proportions of rootstock bark | 穗砧茎粗比 Scion to stock trunk diam ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | IAA | -0.863 | -0.820 | -0.831 | 0.916 | 0.402 | -0.929 |
GA3 | 0.211 | 0.277 | 0.313 | -0.059 | 0.174 | -0.359 | |
ZR | 0.752 | 0.855 | 0.792 | -0.946 | -0.667 | 0.773 | |
BR | -0.377 | -0.390 | -0.335 | 0.583 | 0.517 | -0.741 | |
ABA | -0.905 | -0.963* | -0.975* | 0.887 | 0.324 | -0.529 | |
嫁接口 | IAA | 0.799 | 0.923 | 0.909 | -0.816 | -0.371 | 0.344 |
Graft union | GA3 | 0.855 | 0.928 | 0.939 | -0.826 | -0.292 | 0.422 |
ZR | -0.835 | -0.651 | -0.728 | 0.761 | 0.112 | -0.998** | |
BR | 0.613 | 0.583 | 0.663 | -0.402 | 0.165 | 0.090 | |
ABA | -0.942 | -0.770 | -0.858 | 0.831 | 0.089 | -0.966* | |
叶片 | IAA/ABA | -0.755 | -0.691 | -0.699 | 0.826 | 0.386 | -0.941 |
Leaf | GA3/ABA | 0.382 | 0.489 | 0.503 | -0.284 | -0.004 | -0.206 |
BR/ABA | -0.224 | -0.137 | -0.123 | 0.351 | 0.282 | -0.706 | |
ZR/ABA | 0.947 | 0.964* | 0.969* | -0.986* | -0.428 | 0.802 | |
IAA/GA3 | -0.838 | -0.972* | -9.440 | 0.897 | 0.465 | -0.445 | |
IAA/ZR | -0.858 | -0.725 | -0.778 | 0.831 | 0.223 | -0.984* | |
嫁接口 Graft union | IAA/ABA | 0.942 | 0.939 | 0.981* | -0.866 | -0.213 | 0.590 |
GA3/ABA | 0.983* | 0.933 | 0.991** | -0.889 | -0.178 | 0.709 | |
BR/ABA | 0.883 | 0.765 | 0.874 | -0.656 | 0.123 | 0.506 | |
ZR/ABA | -0.836 | -0.666 | -0.736 | 0.778 | 0.145 | -0.996** | |
IAA/GA3 | 0.149 | 0.282 | 0.282 | -0.064 | 0.050 | -0.433 | |
IAA/ZR | 0.997** | 0.924 | 0.985* | -0.912 | -0.191 | 0.801 |
激素 Hormone | 干质量 Dry weight | 根总长 Length | 表面积 Surface area | 平均直径Average diameter | 根体积 Root volume | 根皮率 Proportions of root bark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAA | 0.467 | 0.632 | 0.609 | 0.573 | 0.591 | 0.374 |
GA3 | -0.759 | -0.858 | -0.848 | -0.821 | -0.838 | -0.071 |
ZR | -0.980* | -0.910 | -0.927 | -0.938 | -0.936 | 0.474 |
BR | -0.952* | -0.928 | -0.941 | -0.931 | -0.944 | 0.412 |
ABA | 0.327 | 0.099 | 0.144 | 0.166 | 0.168 | -0.959* |
IAA/ABA | 0.222 | 0.436 | 0.400 | 0.367 | 0.376 | 0.689 |
GA3/ABA | -0.914 | -0.914 | -0.924 | -0.908 | -0.924 | 0.342 |
BR/ABA | -0.873 | -0.737 | -0.765 | -0.784 | -0.782 | 0.698 |
ZR/ABA | -0.905 | -0.791 | -0.819 | -0.824 | -0.832 | 0.705 |
IAA/GA3 | 0.889 | 0.970* | 0.959* | 0.950 | 0.952* | 0.085 |
IAA/ZR | 0.917 | 0.983* | 0.973* | 0.971* | 0.968* | 0.060 |
表4 不同砧木红江橙根系激素含量/比值与根系生长指标的相关系数(r)
Table 4 Correlation coefficient between hormone content/ratio of root and root growth index of Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks
激素 Hormone | 干质量 Dry weight | 根总长 Length | 表面积 Surface area | 平均直径Average diameter | 根体积 Root volume | 根皮率 Proportions of root bark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAA | 0.467 | 0.632 | 0.609 | 0.573 | 0.591 | 0.374 |
GA3 | -0.759 | -0.858 | -0.848 | -0.821 | -0.838 | -0.071 |
ZR | -0.980* | -0.910 | -0.927 | -0.938 | -0.936 | 0.474 |
BR | -0.952* | -0.928 | -0.941 | -0.931 | -0.944 | 0.412 |
ABA | 0.327 | 0.099 | 0.144 | 0.166 | 0.168 | -0.959* |
IAA/ABA | 0.222 | 0.436 | 0.400 | 0.367 | 0.376 | 0.689 |
GA3/ABA | -0.914 | -0.914 | -0.924 | -0.908 | -0.924 | 0.342 |
BR/ABA | -0.873 | -0.737 | -0.765 | -0.784 | -0.782 | 0.698 |
ZR/ABA | -0.905 | -0.791 | -0.819 | -0.824 | -0.832 | 0.705 |
IAA/GA3 | 0.889 | 0.970* | 0.959* | 0.950 | 0.952* | 0.085 |
IAA/ZR | 0.917 | 0.983* | 0.973* | 0.971* | 0.968* | 0.060 |
砧木 Rootstock | N/% | P/% | K/% | Ca/% | Mg/% | B/(mg · kg-1) | Zn/(mg · kg-1) | Fe/(mg · kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资阳香橙 ZiyangXiangcheng | 2.02 ± 0.02 c | 0.15 ± 0.00. c | 1.71 ± 0.03 b | 3.11 ± 0.04 b | 0.38 ± 0.00 a | 105.50 ± 1.30 a | 24.80 ± 0.60 b | 69.90 ± 1.50 b |
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 2.05 ± 0.04 c | 0.20 ± 0.00 ab | 1.47 ± 0.04 c | 3.24 ± 0.07 ab | 0.37 ± 0.00 a | 98.80 ± 1.70 a | 22.20 ± 0.20 c | 94.50 ± 2.20 a |
枳 Trifoliate orange | 2.41 ± 0.04 b | 0.17 ± 0.00 a | 1.80 ± 0.07 ab | 3.13 ± 0.06 b | 0.30 ± 0.01 b | 107.10 ± 1.10 a | 28.80 ± 0.80 a | 86.30 ± 5.40 a |
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 2.61 ± 0.01 a | 0.16 ± 0.00 b | 1.89 ± 0.05 a | 3.37 ± 0.05 a | 0.31 ± 0.01 b | 123.40 ± 20.70 a | 30.50 ± 0.80 a | 94.80 ± 2.90 a |
甜橙类适量范围* Appropriate standard | 2.50 ~ 3.00 | 0.13 ~ 0.18 | 1.00 ~ 1.60 | 2.80 ~ 4.20 | 0.20 ~ 0.26 | 40.0 ~ 80.0 | 13.0 ~ 20.0 | 60.0 ~ 130.0 |
表5 不同砧木红江橙叶片矿质元素含量(嫁接15个月)
Table 5 Mineral element content in leaves of Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks(15 months after grafting)
砧木 Rootstock | N/% | P/% | K/% | Ca/% | Mg/% | B/(mg · kg-1) | Zn/(mg · kg-1) | Fe/(mg · kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资阳香橙 ZiyangXiangcheng | 2.02 ± 0.02 c | 0.15 ± 0.00. c | 1.71 ± 0.03 b | 3.11 ± 0.04 b | 0.38 ± 0.00 a | 105.50 ± 1.30 a | 24.80 ± 0.60 b | 69.90 ± 1.50 b |
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 2.05 ± 0.04 c | 0.20 ± 0.00 ab | 1.47 ± 0.04 c | 3.24 ± 0.07 ab | 0.37 ± 0.00 a | 98.80 ± 1.70 a | 22.20 ± 0.20 c | 94.50 ± 2.20 a |
枳 Trifoliate orange | 2.41 ± 0.04 b | 0.17 ± 0.00 a | 1.80 ± 0.07 ab | 3.13 ± 0.06 b | 0.30 ± 0.01 b | 107.10 ± 1.10 a | 28.80 ± 0.80 a | 86.30 ± 5.40 a |
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 2.61 ± 0.01 a | 0.16 ± 0.00 b | 1.89 ± 0.05 a | 3.37 ± 0.05 a | 0.31 ± 0.01 b | 123.40 ± 20.70 a | 30.50 ± 0.80 a | 94.80 ± 2.90 a |
甜橙类适量范围* Appropriate standard | 2.50 ~ 3.00 | 0.13 ~ 0.18 | 1.00 ~ 1.60 | 2.80 ~ 4.20 | 0.20 ~ 0.26 | 40.0 ~ 80.0 | 13.0 ~ 20.0 | 60.0 ~ 130.0 |
生长指标 Growth index | 接穗长 Shoot length | 接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 单叶鲜质量 Fresh weight per leaf | 单叶干质量 Dry weight per leaf | 叶片含水量 Leaf water content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片含水量 Leaf water content | -0.984* | -0.751 | -0.850 | -0.878 | 1 |
N | -0.986* | -0.761 | -0.842 | -0.871 | 1.000** |
P | -0.250 | 0.217 | -0.708 | -0.691 | 0.387 |
K | -0.903 | -0.994** | -0.382 | -0.433 | 0.811 |
Ca | -0.531 | -0.212 | -0.760 | -0.748 | 0.618 |
Mg | 0.925 | 0.676 | 0.816 | 0.845 | -0.946 |
B | -0.893 | -0.855 | -0.576 | -0.609 | 0.854 |
Zn | -0.983* | -0.928 | -0.612 | -0.656 | 0.936 |
Fe | -0.377 | 0.143 | -0.898 | -0.870 | 0.536 |
表6 不同砧木红江橙叶片矿质元素与植株生长指标的相关系数(r)
Table 6 Correlation coefficient between mineral elements in leaves and plant growth index of Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks
生长指标 Growth index | 接穗长 Shoot length | 接穗茎粗 Stem diameter | 单叶鲜质量 Fresh weight per leaf | 单叶干质量 Dry weight per leaf | 叶片含水量 Leaf water content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片含水量 Leaf water content | -0.984* | -0.751 | -0.850 | -0.878 | 1 |
N | -0.986* | -0.761 | -0.842 | -0.871 | 1.000** |
P | -0.250 | 0.217 | -0.708 | -0.691 | 0.387 |
K | -0.903 | -0.994** | -0.382 | -0.433 | 0.811 |
Ca | -0.531 | -0.212 | -0.760 | -0.748 | 0.618 |
Mg | 0.925 | 0.676 | 0.816 | 0.845 | -0.946 |
B | -0.893 | -0.855 | -0.576 | -0.609 | 0.854 |
Zn | -0.983* | -0.928 | -0.612 | -0.656 | 0.936 |
Fe | -0.377 | 0.143 | -0.898 | -0.870 | 0.536 |
砧木 Rootstock | 果面光滑度 Peel smoothness | 沟纹 Flute | 单果质量/g Fruit weight | 横径/ mm Transverse diameter | 纵径/mm Vertical diameter | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 果皮厚/mm Peel thickness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资阳香橙 Ziyang Xiangcheng | 光滑,少部分粗糙 Smooth,less rough | 中 Mideum | 169.3 ± 6.1 a | 69.4 ± 1.1 a | 65.3 ± 0.9 a | 0.94 ± 0.01 a | 2.61 ± 0.12 a |
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 光滑 Smooth | 少Few | 131.3 ± 7.5 b | 63.9 ± 1.0 b | 61.1 ± 0.9 b | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 2.58 ± 0.16 a |
枳 Trifoliate orange | 多粗糙 More rough | 中 Mideum | 116.4 ± 8.0 b | 62.3 ± 1.4 b | 60.1 ± 1.4 b | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 2.61 ± 0.12 a |
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 多粗糙 More rough | 中 Mideum | 125.7 ± 11.4 b | 63.0 ± 1.6 b | 59.9 ± 1.4 b | 0.95 ± 0.01 a | 2.71 ± 0.15 a |
表7 不同砧木红江橙果实外观性状
Table 7 Fruit appearance characters of Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks
砧木 Rootstock | 果面光滑度 Peel smoothness | 沟纹 Flute | 单果质量/g Fruit weight | 横径/ mm Transverse diameter | 纵径/mm Vertical diameter | 果形指数 Fruit shape index | 果皮厚/mm Peel thickness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资阳香橙 Ziyang Xiangcheng | 光滑,少部分粗糙 Smooth,less rough | 中 Mideum | 169.3 ± 6.1 a | 69.4 ± 1.1 a | 65.3 ± 0.9 a | 0.94 ± 0.01 a | 2.61 ± 0.12 a |
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 光滑 Smooth | 少Few | 131.3 ± 7.5 b | 63.9 ± 1.0 b | 61.1 ± 0.9 b | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 2.58 ± 0.16 a |
枳 Trifoliate orange | 多粗糙 More rough | 中 Mideum | 116.4 ± 8.0 b | 62.3 ± 1.4 b | 60.1 ± 1.4 b | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 2.61 ± 0.12 a |
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 多粗糙 More rough | 中 Mideum | 125.7 ± 11.4 b | 63.0 ± 1.6 b | 59.9 ± 1.4 b | 0.95 ± 0.01 a | 2.71 ± 0.15 a |
砧木 Rootstock | 可溶性固形物/ ◦Brix Soluble solids | 总糖/ (mg · g-1) Total sugar | 可滴定酸/ (mg · g-1)Titratable acidity | 固酸比 Soluble solids/acidity ratio | 维生素C/(μg · g-1) Vitamin C | 总酚/(μg · g-1) Total phenol | 总黄酮/ (μg · g-1) Total flavonoid | 氨基酸/ (μmol · g-1)Amino acid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资阳香橙 Ziyang Xiangcheng | 12.5 ± 0.1 b | 68.1 ± 2.5 b | 8.3 ± 1.0 a | 14.0 ± 0.7 b | 320.4 ± 20.7 a | 393.5 ± 15.5 a | 87.4 ± 5.7 b | 11.0 ± 0.5 b |
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 14.8 ± 0.1 a | 88.5 ± 7.1 a | 7.8 ± 0.5 a | 20.4 ± 0.5 a | 304.6 ± 14.7 a | 435.3 ± 22.6 a | 105.3 ± 0.8 a | 19.8 ± 1.5 a |
枳 Trifoliate orange | 12.1 ± 0.6 b | 63.8 ± 7.3 b | 6.6 ± 0.3 a | 19.0 ± 1.0 a | 249.5 ± 31.4 a | 393.4 ± 23.4 a | 94.8 ± 3.5 ab | 19.1 ± 1.3 a |
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 12.4 ± 0.3 b | 63.8 ± 3.3 b | 6.3 ± 0.6 a | 19.0 ± 1.0 a | 262.9 ± 29.1 a | 392.7 ± 9.1 a | 86.7 ± 3.1 b | 20.4 ± 1.7 a |
表8 不同砧木红江橙的果肉品质
Table 8 Fruit quality of Hongjiang orange grafted with different rootstocks
砧木 Rootstock | 可溶性固形物/ ◦Brix Soluble solids | 总糖/ (mg · g-1) Total sugar | 可滴定酸/ (mg · g-1)Titratable acidity | 固酸比 Soluble solids/acidity ratio | 维生素C/(μg · g-1) Vitamin C | 总酚/(μg · g-1) Total phenol | 总黄酮/ (μg · g-1) Total flavonoid | 氨基酸/ (μmol · g-1)Amino acid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资阳香橙 Ziyang Xiangcheng | 12.5 ± 0.1 b | 68.1 ± 2.5 b | 8.3 ± 1.0 a | 14.0 ± 0.7 b | 320.4 ± 20.7 a | 393.5 ± 15.5 a | 87.4 ± 5.7 b | 11.0 ± 0.5 b |
卡里佐枳橙 Carrizo citrange | 14.8 ± 0.1 a | 88.5 ± 7.1 a | 7.8 ± 0.5 a | 20.4 ± 0.5 a | 304.6 ± 14.7 a | 435.3 ± 22.6 a | 105.3 ± 0.8 a | 19.8 ± 1.5 a |
枳 Trifoliate orange | 12.1 ± 0.6 b | 63.8 ± 7.3 b | 6.6 ± 0.3 a | 19.0 ± 1.0 a | 249.5 ± 31.4 a | 393.4 ± 23.4 a | 94.8 ± 3.5 ab | 19.1 ± 1.3 a |
飞龙枳 Flying Dragon | 12.4 ± 0.3 b | 63.8 ± 3.3 b | 6.3 ± 0.6 a | 19.0 ± 1.0 a | 262.9 ± 29.1 a | 392.7 ± 9.1 a | 86.7 ± 3.1 b | 20.4 ± 1.7 a |
[1] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0038 |
陈冉, 苏厚文, 姜伟涛, 李前进, 陈学森, 沈向, 尹承苗, 毛志泉. 2022. 苹果容器苗在连作土壤上的生长表现及其根区土壤环境特征. 园艺学报, 49 (1):1-10.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0038 |
|
[2] |
|
董翠翠. 2017. 三种柑橘砧木及其嫁接苗矮化性状相关参数研究[硕士论文]. 重庆: 西南大学.
|
|
[3] |
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55957-3 |
[4] |
|
[5] |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01598 pmid: 31921247 |
[6] |
doi: 10.1038/nature01387 URL |
[7] |
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery422 URL |
[8] |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00727 pmid: 25566298 |
[9] |
Hassanzadeh Khankahdani H,
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.066 |
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
贺世雄. 2019. 不同砧穗组合柑橘生长差异及矮化机理研究[硕士论文]. 广州: 华南农业大学.
|
|
[12] |
doi: 10.3390/ijms19020505 URL |
[13] |
|
何苇竹. 2020. 我国柑橘叶片矿质养分含量标准的建立及营养诊断[硕士论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学.
|
|
[14] |
doi: 10.1038/hortres.2017.71 URL |
[15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.110974 URL |
[16] |
doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00505-2 pmid: 33790260 |
[17] |
doi: 10.1023/A:1006299414481 URL |
[18] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.055 URL |
[19] |
doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7110468 URL |
[20] |
doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055863 URL |
[21] |
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2005.01.015 |
李德荣, 程建峰, 董闻达, 梅宗焕, 刘柏根. 2005. 施氮量对百喜草产草量、叶片含氮量及含水量的影响. 草地学报,(1):63-65.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2005.01.015 |
|
[22] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.03.022 URL |
[23] |
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12738 pmid: 28376249 |
[24] |
|
李勇, 方伟超, 朱更瑞, 王力荣, 彭福田. 2014. 双容器与控根器限根对桃树生长发育的影响. 果树学报, 31 (2):213-220.
|
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
刘振, 洪励伟, 李娟, 陈杰忠, 罗小燕, 覃燕. 2016. 不同柑橘砧木对砂糖橘果实品质的影响. 广东农业科学, 43 (8):39-44.
|
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
doi: 10.3390/ijms20143592 URL |
[29] |
|
[30] |
doi: 10.1104/pp.103.028662 URL |
[31] |
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru534 pmid: 25628331 |
[32] |
|
覃艳. 2016. 柑橘砧木的根系特征及对砂糖橘幼树生长的影响[硕士论文]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院.
|
|
[33] |
doi: 10.1007/s00344-021-10380-9 |
[34] |
|
[35] |
doi: 10.1002/jpln.v173:3 URL |
[36] |
State Forestry Administration of P. R. China. 1999. The analysis methods of forest soil:LY/T 1270—1273-1999. Beijing: Standard Press of China:279-297,301-304. (in Chinese)
|
国家林业局. 1999. 森林土壤分析方法:LY/T 1270—1273-1999. 北京: 中国标准出版社:279-297,301-304.
|
|
[37] |
Statistics Bureau of Guangdong Province. 2022. Guangdong Statistical Yearbook in 2021. (2021-10-8). (in Chinese)
|
广东省统计局. 2022. 广东统计年鉴2021年. (2021-10-8).
|
|
[38] |
doi: 10.1007/s10725-015-0078-2 URL |
[39] |
doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.4609443 URL |
[40] |
doi: S1360-1385(15)00288-5 pmid: 26698413 |
[41] |
doi: 10.1105/tpc.014928 URL |
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
徐媛媛. 2018. 嫁接和逆境胁迫对柑橘miRNA表达的影响[硕士论文]. 重庆: 西南大学.
|
|
[44] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109869 URL |
[45] |
doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00509-y pmid: 33790234 |
[46] |
|
郑永强, 邓烈, 何绍兰, 周志钦, 易时来, 毛莎莎, 赵旭阳. 2010. 几种砧木对哈姆林甜橙植株生长、产量及果实品质的影响. 园艺学报, 37 (4):532-538.
|
|
[47] |
|
钟广炎, 钟云, 闫化学, 姜波, 曾继吾. 2016. 无病容器大苗在柑桔黄龙病综合防控中的应用价值. 广东农业科学, 43 (5):92-95.
|
|
[48] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0502 |
钟灶发, 张利娟, 高思思, 彭婷. 2021. 干旱胁迫下4种柑橘砧木叶片细胞学特征及抗旱性比较. 园艺学报, 48 (8):1579-1588.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0502 |
|
[49] |
doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2022.01.001 URL |
[50] |
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63212-9 URL |
[1] | 姬雅静, 李金焱, 张沛宇, 马力群, 朱鸿亮. 番茄果实形状的调控机制研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(9): 2015-2030. |
[2] | 王 文, 张柯楠, 方莫扉, 丁思悦, 王雪飞, 惠竹梅, . 果袋颜色对‘赤霞珠’葡萄果皮花色苷积累的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(8): 1723-1738. |
[3] | 薛珍珍, 关鸿发, 李娜, 李凌飞, 钟春梅. 铁十字秋海棠GASA家族全基因组鉴定及叶斑形成的初步探索[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(7): 1482-1494. |
[4] | 邓成凤, 李素平, 张瑞轩, 韩冷, 李勇. 产酶溶杆菌LE16对采后柑橘青霉绿霉病的防治作用[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(7): 1574-1586. |
[5] | 张乐欢, 邹昌玉, 王兆昊, 杨雯, 邹修平, 何永睿, 陈善春, 龙琴. 柑橘AOS1-2的克隆及其响应溃疡病菌侵染的表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(6): 1355-1367. |
[6] | 郭静, 廖满余, 金燕, 马小川, 张芬, 卢晓鹏, 邓子牛, 盛玲. 柑橘转录因子CsbHLH3调控柠檬酸代谢的功能解析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(5): 947-958. |
[7] | 袁茜, 张曼, 马开峰, 王佳, 张启翔. 梅花PmMYB21在花丝伸长过程中的功能与表达调控分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(5): 1048-1062. |
[8] | 高美娜, 孙明飞, 朱杰, 井俊丽, 李佳, 周莎莎, 梁博文, 徐继忠, 李中勇. 苹果砧木‘冀砧2号’绞缢、环割压条生根效果及过程中IAA含量的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(5): 1063-1072. |
[9] | 李中瀚, 唐美玲, 郑秋玲, 刘明慧, 康慧, 高振, 杜远鹏. 聚乙烯编织物Coverlys TF150®覆盖对‘蜜光’葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(5): 1073-1084. |
[10] | 吕若亚, 李云, 郑永钦, 邓晓玲, 郑正. 黄龙病菌在柑橘果实橘络中的分布[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(5): 1110-1117. |
[11] | 王萍, 盛玲, 杨锦鹏, 周凌磊, 金燕, 罗旭钊, 马先锋, 邓子牛. 红心柚和美国枸橼杂种后代对柑橘溃疡病的抗性评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(4): 765-777. |
[12] | 邹运乾, 罗曲娟, 张金, 许让伟, 程运江. 虫胶松香涂膜对柑橘货架期品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(4): 853-863. |
[13] | 李玉梅, 娄玉穗, 王小龙, 马玉全, 王海波, 吕中伟. ‘夏黑’葡萄高品质果园植株叶片和土壤营养诊断研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(4): 864-874. |
[14] | 赖恒鑫, 李文广, 彭良志, 何义仲, 朱攀攀, 杨万云, 凌丽俐, 付行政, 淳长品, 曹立. 沃柑果实春夏季留树保鲜品质变化研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(3): 485-494. |
[15] | 刘语诺, 曹亚, 王帅, 杜美霞, 郑林, 陈善春, 邹修平. 柑橘CsMYB41和CsMYB63响应溃疡病菌侵染的表达[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(3): 495-507. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司