园艺学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 219-232.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0289
刘照霞, 邢玥, 吴晓娴, 田歌, 朱占玲, 葛顺峰*(), 姜远茂*()
收稿日期:
2020-04-20
修回日期:
2020-08-23
出版日期:
2021-02-25
发布日期:
2021-03-09
通讯作者:
葛顺峰,姜远茂
E-mail:geshunfeng210@126.com;ymjiang@sdau.edu.cn
基金资助:
LIU Zhaoxia, XING Yue, WU Xiaoxian, TIAN Ge, ZHU Zhanling, GE Shunfeng*(), JIANG Yuanmao*()
Received:
2020-04-20
Revised:
2020-08-23
Online:
2021-02-25
Published:
2021-03-09
Contact:
GE Shunfeng,JIANG Yuanmao
E-mail:geshunfeng210@126.com;ymjiang@sdau.edu.cn
摘要:
为明确矮化中间砧苹果树合理的施肥位置,减少氮肥的浪费。试验于2018年和2019年,以‘烟富3’苹果/SH6/八棱海棠为试材,借助 15N同位素示踪技术,研究了萌芽前在树冠投影范围距树干由近及远的3个水平距离——内环、中环和外环施氮对新梢旺长期细根和土壤 15N分布、树体 15N吸收以及果实产量和品质的影响。结果表明:各处理的苹果细根(直径 ≤ 2 mm)根长密度均在水平方向和垂直方向呈衰减规律,主要分布在距离树干水平方向0 ~ 100 cm、垂直方向0 ~ 40 cm土层范围;与不施肥(对照)相比,施氮增加了细根根长密度,以施氮区内细根根长密度增加最为显著;从垂直方向0 ~ 20 cm土层施氮区细根根长密度增加量来看,内环施氮处理增幅最大,为对照的1.33倍 ~ 1.36倍,其次是中环施氮处理。各处理土壤 15N含量峰值在水平方向均出现在施氮区域,在垂直方向均出现在0 ~ 20 cm土层。不同处理间树体细根根长密度与土壤 15N分布空间吻合度(RLD- 15N)差异显著,内环施氮处理显著高于中环和外环施氮处理。内环施氮显著提高了新梢旺长期树体新生器官氮素累积量,树体 15N利用率表现为内环施氮 > 中环施氮 > 外环施氮;内环施氮和外环施氮土壤 15N残留率无显著差异,但均高于外环施氮。与外环施氮处理相比,内环施氮处理显著提高了果实产量、可溶性糖含量和糖酸比,而硬度和可滴定酸含量无显著差异。可见,矮化中间砧苹果内环施氮有利于提高细根根长密度与土壤氮的空间分布吻合度,增加了生长前期新生器官含氮量,提高了树体 15N利用效率,提高了果实产量和可溶性糖含量。因此实际生产中成年矮化中间砧苹果树推荐在靠近树干位置的1/3树冠投影面积处,即约为距树干水平距离0 ~ 75 cm范围内施氮肥。
中图分类号:
刘照霞, 邢玥, 吴晓娴, 田歌, 朱占玲, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 矮化中间砧苹果施氮位置对细根分布、氮素吸收和产量品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(2): 219-232.
LIU Zhaoxia, XING Yue, WU Xiaoxian, TIAN Ge, ZHU Zhanling, GE Shunfeng, JIANG Yuanmao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Position on Fine Root Distribution,Nitrogen Absorption,Yield and Quality of Dwarfing Interstock Apple Trees[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(2): 219-232.
图2 矮化中间砧苹果不同位置(内环、中环和外环)施氮处理下细根(直径 ≤ 2 mm)的空间分布
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of fine roots(diameter ≤ 2 mm)of dwarfing interstock apple trees under nitrogen application at different positions(inner ring,middle ring and outer ring)
图3 矮化中间砧苹果不同位置(内环、中环和外环)施氮处理下土壤15N含量的空间分布
Fig. 3 Spatial distribution of soil 15N content of dwarfing interstock apple trees under nitrogen application at different positions(inner ring,middle ring and outer ring)
土层/ cm Soil layer | 距树干距 离/cm Distance from trunk | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
内环施氮 Inner ring | 中环施氮 Middle ring | 外环施氮 Outer ring | 内环施氮 Inter ring | 中环施氮 Middle ring | 外环施氮 Outer ring | ||||
0 ~ 20 | 0 ~ 25 | 20.21 ± 1.53 a | 1.67 ± 0.21 b | 1.09 ± 0.12 c | 20.34 ± 0.52 a | 2.00 ± 0.32 b | 1.11 ± 0.05 b | ||
25 ~ 50 | 28.62 ± 1.12 a | 12.32 ± 0.98 b | 1.72 ± 0.21 c | 25.45 ± 1.81 a | 10.46 ± 1.00 b | 1.80 ± 0.28 c | |||
50 ~ 75 | 21.99 ± 2.13 a | 16.34 ± 0.91 b | 4.48 ± 0.54 c | 19.00 ± 0.75 a | 11.15 ± 1.23 b | 4.74 ± 0.37 c | |||
75 ~ 100 | 13.79 ± 1.10 b | 19.73 ± 1.26 a | 6.69 ± 0.34 c | 11.06 ± 1.44 b | 19.96 ± 2.21 a | 6.00 ± 0.62 c | |||
100 ~ 125 | 3.57 ± 0.31 b | 4.85 ± 1.12 ab | 7.23 ± 0.41 a | 3.17 ± 0.19 b | 5.99 ± 0.51 a | 6.42 ± 0.72 a | |||
125 ~ 150 | 0.65 ± 0.02 c | 1.35 ± 0.01 b | 3.63 ± 0.13 a | 0.30 ± 0.06 c | 0.68 ± 0.06 b | 1.51 ± 0.12 a | |||
20 ~ 40 | 0 ~ 25 | 13.90 ± 0.76 a | 1.32 ± 0.08 b | 0.62 ± 0.02 c | 14.05 ± 0.48 a | 1.39 ± 0.15 b | 0.58 ± 0.08 c | ||
25 ~ 50 | 11.66 ± 0.52 a | 2.51 ± 0.02 b | 0.78 ± 0.01 c | 11.65 ± 0.51 a | 2.54 ± 0.08 b | 0.81 ± 0.11 c | |||
50 ~ 75 | 10.80 ± 1.01 a | 5.06 ± 0.28 b | 1.63 ± 0.05 c | 10.61 ± 0.99 a | 4.86 ± 0.40 b | 1.48 ± 0.19 c | |||
75 ~ 100 | 5.15 ± 0.66 b | 10.11 ± 0.37 a | 3.54 ± 0.10 b | 5.00 ± 0.23 b | 10.50 ± 1.01 a | 2.46 ± 0.27 b | |||
100 ~ 125 | 1.20 ± 0.01 c | 1.72 ± 0.03 b | 4.38 ± 0.03 a | 1.09 ± 0.11 c | 2.30 ± 0.19 b | 3.63 ± 0.34 a | |||
125 ~ 150 | 0.56 ± 0.01 b | 0.38 ± 0.01 c | 1.15 ± 0.08 a | 0.30 ± 0.03 b | 0.19 ± 0.01 c | 1.27 ± 0.11 a | |||
40 ~ 60 | 0 ~ 25 | 2.92 ± 0.35 a | 0.68 ± 0.01 b | 0.09 ± 0.01 c | 2.33 ± 0.27 a | 0.09 ± 0.03 b | 0.07 ± 0.02 b | ||
25 ~ 50 | 2.31 ± 0.21 a | 0.13 ± 0.02 b | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | 2.39 ± 0.40 a | 0.48 ± 0.02 b | 0.05 ± 0.02 c | |||
50 ~ 75 | 1.79 ± 0.02 a | 0.56 ± 0.13 b | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | 1.22 ± 0.30 a | 0.57 ± 0.15 b | 0.05 ± 0.02 c | |||
75 ~ 100 | 0.39 ± 0.07 b | 1.47 ± 0.17 a | 0.18 ± 0.05 c | 0.47 ± 0.03 b | 1.26 ± 0.04 a | 0.28 ± 0.02 c | |||
100 ~ 125 | 0.20 ± 0.01 b | 0.12 ± 0.01 b | 0.79 ± 0.02 a | 0.16 ± 0.02 b | 0.14 ± 0.03 b | 0.63 ± 0.01 a | |||
125 ~ 150 | 0.02 ± 0.00 b | 0.03 ± 0.00 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 a | 0.07 ± 0.00 b | 0.09 ± 0.00 b | 0.07 ± 0.01 a | |||
总计 Total | 139.73 ± 6.54 a | 80.37 ± 3.31 b | 38.27 ± 1.96 c | 128.64 ± 7.35 a | 74.60 ± 6.47 b | 32.96 ± 2.55 c |
表1 苹果细根根长密度与土壤15N含量空间吻合度
Table 1 The spatial concordance index between the density of apple fine root length and soil 15N content × 10-2
土层/ cm Soil layer | 距树干距 离/cm Distance from trunk | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
内环施氮 Inner ring | 中环施氮 Middle ring | 外环施氮 Outer ring | 内环施氮 Inter ring | 中环施氮 Middle ring | 外环施氮 Outer ring | ||||
0 ~ 20 | 0 ~ 25 | 20.21 ± 1.53 a | 1.67 ± 0.21 b | 1.09 ± 0.12 c | 20.34 ± 0.52 a | 2.00 ± 0.32 b | 1.11 ± 0.05 b | ||
25 ~ 50 | 28.62 ± 1.12 a | 12.32 ± 0.98 b | 1.72 ± 0.21 c | 25.45 ± 1.81 a | 10.46 ± 1.00 b | 1.80 ± 0.28 c | |||
50 ~ 75 | 21.99 ± 2.13 a | 16.34 ± 0.91 b | 4.48 ± 0.54 c | 19.00 ± 0.75 a | 11.15 ± 1.23 b | 4.74 ± 0.37 c | |||
75 ~ 100 | 13.79 ± 1.10 b | 19.73 ± 1.26 a | 6.69 ± 0.34 c | 11.06 ± 1.44 b | 19.96 ± 2.21 a | 6.00 ± 0.62 c | |||
100 ~ 125 | 3.57 ± 0.31 b | 4.85 ± 1.12 ab | 7.23 ± 0.41 a | 3.17 ± 0.19 b | 5.99 ± 0.51 a | 6.42 ± 0.72 a | |||
125 ~ 150 | 0.65 ± 0.02 c | 1.35 ± 0.01 b | 3.63 ± 0.13 a | 0.30 ± 0.06 c | 0.68 ± 0.06 b | 1.51 ± 0.12 a | |||
20 ~ 40 | 0 ~ 25 | 13.90 ± 0.76 a | 1.32 ± 0.08 b | 0.62 ± 0.02 c | 14.05 ± 0.48 a | 1.39 ± 0.15 b | 0.58 ± 0.08 c | ||
25 ~ 50 | 11.66 ± 0.52 a | 2.51 ± 0.02 b | 0.78 ± 0.01 c | 11.65 ± 0.51 a | 2.54 ± 0.08 b | 0.81 ± 0.11 c | |||
50 ~ 75 | 10.80 ± 1.01 a | 5.06 ± 0.28 b | 1.63 ± 0.05 c | 10.61 ± 0.99 a | 4.86 ± 0.40 b | 1.48 ± 0.19 c | |||
75 ~ 100 | 5.15 ± 0.66 b | 10.11 ± 0.37 a | 3.54 ± 0.10 b | 5.00 ± 0.23 b | 10.50 ± 1.01 a | 2.46 ± 0.27 b | |||
100 ~ 125 | 1.20 ± 0.01 c | 1.72 ± 0.03 b | 4.38 ± 0.03 a | 1.09 ± 0.11 c | 2.30 ± 0.19 b | 3.63 ± 0.34 a | |||
125 ~ 150 | 0.56 ± 0.01 b | 0.38 ± 0.01 c | 1.15 ± 0.08 a | 0.30 ± 0.03 b | 0.19 ± 0.01 c | 1.27 ± 0.11 a | |||
40 ~ 60 | 0 ~ 25 | 2.92 ± 0.35 a | 0.68 ± 0.01 b | 0.09 ± 0.01 c | 2.33 ± 0.27 a | 0.09 ± 0.03 b | 0.07 ± 0.02 b | ||
25 ~ 50 | 2.31 ± 0.21 a | 0.13 ± 0.02 b | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | 2.39 ± 0.40 a | 0.48 ± 0.02 b | 0.05 ± 0.02 c | |||
50 ~ 75 | 1.79 ± 0.02 a | 0.56 ± 0.13 b | 0.07 ± 0.01 c | 1.22 ± 0.30 a | 0.57 ± 0.15 b | 0.05 ± 0.02 c | |||
75 ~ 100 | 0.39 ± 0.07 b | 1.47 ± 0.17 a | 0.18 ± 0.05 c | 0.47 ± 0.03 b | 1.26 ± 0.04 a | 0.28 ± 0.02 c | |||
100 ~ 125 | 0.20 ± 0.01 b | 0.12 ± 0.01 b | 0.79 ± 0.02 a | 0.16 ± 0.02 b | 0.14 ± 0.03 b | 0.63 ± 0.01 a | |||
125 ~ 150 | 0.02 ± 0.00 b | 0.03 ± 0.00 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 a | 0.07 ± 0.00 b | 0.09 ± 0.00 b | 0.07 ± 0.01 a | |||
总计 Total | 139.73 ± 6.54 a | 80.37 ± 3.31 b | 38.27 ± 1.96 c | 128.64 ± 7.35 a | 74.60 ± 6.47 b | 32.96 ± 2.55 c |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 细根 Fine root | 粗根 Large root | 一年生枝 Annual shoot | 叶片 Leaf | 果实 Fruit | 多年生枝 Perennial branch | 中心干 Trunk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 内环施氮 Inner ring | 1.30 ± 0.04 a | 1.24 ± 0.02 a | 0.75 ± 0.04 a | 0.57 ± 0.01 a | 0.44 ± 0.02 a | 0.21 ± 0.02 a | 0.12 ± 0.01 ab |
中环施氮Middle ring | 0.86 ± 0.03 b | 0.79 ± 0.01 b | 0.56 ± 0.01 b | 0.43 ± 0.02 b | 0.35 ± 0.01 b | 0.20 ± 0.01 a | 0.13 ± 0.01 a | |
外环施氮Outer ring | 0.67 ± 0.03 c | 0.63 ± 0.03 c | 0.47 ± 0.01 c | 0.33 ± 0.01 c | 0.22 ± 0.01 c | 0.19 ± 0.01 a | 0.11 ± 0.01 b | |
2019 | 内环施氮 Inner ring | 1.29 ± 0.03 a | 1.25 ± 0.03 a | 0.68 ± 0.02 a | 0.53 ± 0.02 a | 0.39 ± 0.02 a | 0.24 ± 0.03 a | 0.15 ± 0.01 a |
中环施氮Middle ring | 0.77 ± 0.02 b | 0.73 ± 0.02 b | 0.53 ± 0.01 b | 0.39 ± 0.01 b | 0.32 ± 0.01 b | 0.20 ± 0.01 b | 0.11 ± 0.01 b | |
外环施氮Outer ring | 0.66 ± 0.03 c | 0.57 ± 0.02 c | 0.44 ± 0.01 c | 0.32 ± 0.01 b | 0.21 ± 0.02 c | 0.16 ± 0.01 b | 0.10 ± 0.01 b |
表2 矮化中间砧苹果不同位置(内环、中环和外环)施氮处理下植株各器官Ndff值
Table 2 The Ndff valuesof different organs of dwarfing interstock apple trees under nitrogen application at different positions(inner ring,middle ring and outer ring) %
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 细根 Fine root | 粗根 Large root | 一年生枝 Annual shoot | 叶片 Leaf | 果实 Fruit | 多年生枝 Perennial branch | 中心干 Trunk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 内环施氮 Inner ring | 1.30 ± 0.04 a | 1.24 ± 0.02 a | 0.75 ± 0.04 a | 0.57 ± 0.01 a | 0.44 ± 0.02 a | 0.21 ± 0.02 a | 0.12 ± 0.01 ab |
中环施氮Middle ring | 0.86 ± 0.03 b | 0.79 ± 0.01 b | 0.56 ± 0.01 b | 0.43 ± 0.02 b | 0.35 ± 0.01 b | 0.20 ± 0.01 a | 0.13 ± 0.01 a | |
外环施氮Outer ring | 0.67 ± 0.03 c | 0.63 ± 0.03 c | 0.47 ± 0.01 c | 0.33 ± 0.01 c | 0.22 ± 0.01 c | 0.19 ± 0.01 a | 0.11 ± 0.01 b | |
2019 | 内环施氮 Inner ring | 1.29 ± 0.03 a | 1.25 ± 0.03 a | 0.68 ± 0.02 a | 0.53 ± 0.02 a | 0.39 ± 0.02 a | 0.24 ± 0.03 a | 0.15 ± 0.01 a |
中环施氮Middle ring | 0.77 ± 0.02 b | 0.73 ± 0.02 b | 0.53 ± 0.01 b | 0.39 ± 0.01 b | 0.32 ± 0.01 b | 0.20 ± 0.01 b | 0.11 ± 0.01 b | |
外环施氮Outer ring | 0.66 ± 0.03 c | 0.57 ± 0.02 c | 0.44 ± 0.01 c | 0.32 ± 0.01 b | 0.21 ± 0.02 c | 0.16 ± 0.01 b | 0.10 ± 0.01 b |
年份 Year | 施氮处理 Treatment | 吸收量/g Uptake | 利用率/% Utilization rate | 总残留量/g Total residue | 残留率/% Residual rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
内环Inner ring | 0.35 ± 0.01 a | 7.52 ± 0.66 a | 2.51 ± 0.13 a | 54.54 ± 3.34 a | |
2018 | 中环Middle ring | 0.20 ± 0.01 b | 4.38 ± 0.19 b | 2.47 ± 0.09 a | 53.68 ± 2.22 a |
外环Outer ring | 0.14 ± 0.01 c | 2.95 ± 0.15 c | 1.90 ± 0.11 b | 43.40 ± 1.65 b | |
内环Inner ring | 0.32 ± 0.01 a | 6.94 ± 0.30 a | 2.53 ± 0.06 a | 55.07 ± 1.33 a | |
2019 | 中环Middle ring | 0.17 ± 0.01 b | 3.70 ± 0.27 b | 2.42 ± 0.05 a | 52.70 ± 1.20 a |
外环Outer ring | 0.12 ± 0.01 c | 2.58 ± 0.30 c | 1.85 ± 0.09 b | 40.30 ± 2.88 b |
表3 矮化中间砧苹果不同位置(内环、中环和外环)施氮处理下植株15N吸收和残留状况
Table 3 15N utilization and residual of dwarfing interstock apple trees under nitrogen application at different positions (inner ring,middle ring and outer ring)
年份 Year | 施氮处理 Treatment | 吸收量/g Uptake | 利用率/% Utilization rate | 总残留量/g Total residue | 残留率/% Residual rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
内环Inner ring | 0.35 ± 0.01 a | 7.52 ± 0.66 a | 2.51 ± 0.13 a | 54.54 ± 3.34 a | |
2018 | 中环Middle ring | 0.20 ± 0.01 b | 4.38 ± 0.19 b | 2.47 ± 0.09 a | 53.68 ± 2.22 a |
外环Outer ring | 0.14 ± 0.01 c | 2.95 ± 0.15 c | 1.90 ± 0.11 b | 43.40 ± 1.65 b | |
内环Inner ring | 0.32 ± 0.01 a | 6.94 ± 0.30 a | 2.53 ± 0.06 a | 55.07 ± 1.33 a | |
2019 | 中环Middle ring | 0.17 ± 0.01 b | 3.70 ± 0.27 b | 2.42 ± 0.05 a | 52.70 ± 1.20 a |
外环Outer ring | 0.12 ± 0.01 c | 2.58 ± 0.30 c | 1.85 ± 0.09 b | 40.30 ± 2.88 b |
图4 矮化中间砧苹果不同位置(内环、中环和外环)施氮处理下植株各器官全氮量及植株总氮量
Fig. 4 The total nitrogen of each organ and the plant of dwarfing interstock apple trees under nitrogen application at different positions(inner ring,middle ring and outer ring)
年份 Year | 施氮处理 Treatment | 单株产量/kg Yield per plant | 单果质量/g Single fruit weight | 硬度/(kg · cm-2) Fruit hardness | 可溶性糖含量/% Soluble sugar | 可滴定酸含量/% Titratable acid | 糖酸比 Sugar/acid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 内环Inner ring | 24.68 ± 1.32 a | 242.35 ± 5.24 a | 7.62 ± 0.13 a | 14.45 ± 0.12 a | 0.46 ± 0.01 a | 31.41 ± 1.37 a |
中环Middle ring | 22.73 ± 0.23 b | 235.07 ± 7.38 ab | 7.57 ± 0.10 a | 13.27 ± 0.34 b | 0.47 ± 0.01 a | 28.23 ± 1.16 b | |
外环Outer ring | 21.07 ± 0.75 c | 224.86 ± 6.21 b | 7.61 ± 0.09 a | 13.16 ± 0.44 b | 0.46 ± 0.01 a | 28.60 ± 0.92 b | |
2019 | 内环Inner ring | 22.79 ± 0.77 a | 236.50 ± 3.94 a | 7.51 ± 0.08 a | 13.82 ± 0.38 a | 0.47 ± 0.01 a | 29.62 ± 0.97 a |
中环Middle ring | 21.16 ± 0.45 b | 227.93 ± 4.06 b | 7.43 ± 0.09 a | 13.22 ± 0.31 ab | 0.47 ± 0.01 a | 28.16 ± 1.25 ab | |
外环Outer ring | 20.04 ± 0.40 c | 220.97 ± 5.19 b | 7.39 ± 0.09 a | 12.92 ± 0.51 b | 0.48 ± 0.02 a | 26.75 ± 0.32 b |
表4 矮化中间砧苹果不同位置(内环、中环和外环)施氮处理对果实产量和品质的影响
Table 4 Fruit yield and quality of dwarfing interstock apple trees under nitrogen application at different positions (inner ring,middle ring and outer ring)
年份 Year | 施氮处理 Treatment | 单株产量/kg Yield per plant | 单果质量/g Single fruit weight | 硬度/(kg · cm-2) Fruit hardness | 可溶性糖含量/% Soluble sugar | 可滴定酸含量/% Titratable acid | 糖酸比 Sugar/acid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 内环Inner ring | 24.68 ± 1.32 a | 242.35 ± 5.24 a | 7.62 ± 0.13 a | 14.45 ± 0.12 a | 0.46 ± 0.01 a | 31.41 ± 1.37 a |
中环Middle ring | 22.73 ± 0.23 b | 235.07 ± 7.38 ab | 7.57 ± 0.10 a | 13.27 ± 0.34 b | 0.47 ± 0.01 a | 28.23 ± 1.16 b | |
外环Outer ring | 21.07 ± 0.75 c | 224.86 ± 6.21 b | 7.61 ± 0.09 a | 13.16 ± 0.44 b | 0.46 ± 0.01 a | 28.60 ± 0.92 b | |
2019 | 内环Inner ring | 22.79 ± 0.77 a | 236.50 ± 3.94 a | 7.51 ± 0.08 a | 13.82 ± 0.38 a | 0.47 ± 0.01 a | 29.62 ± 0.97 a |
中环Middle ring | 21.16 ± 0.45 b | 227.93 ± 4.06 b | 7.43 ± 0.09 a | 13.22 ± 0.31 ab | 0.47 ± 0.01 a | 28.16 ± 1.25 ab | |
外环Outer ring | 20.04 ± 0.40 c | 220.97 ± 5.19 b | 7.39 ± 0.09 a | 12.92 ± 0.51 b | 0.48 ± 0.02 a | 26.75 ± 0.32 b |
[1] |
Ames Z R, Brecht J K, Olmstead M A. 2020. Nitrogen fertilization rates in a subtropical peach orchard: effects on tree vigor and fruit quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(2):527-539.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v100.2 URL |
[2] | Bao Shi-dan. 2020. Soil and agricultural chemistryanalysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press: 263-268. (in Chinese) |
鲍士旦. 2020. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社: 263-268. | |
[3] |
Brunetto G, de Melo G W B, Toselli M, Quartieri M, Tagliavini M. 2015. The role of mineral nutrition on yields and fruit quality in grapevine,pear and apple. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 37(4):1089-1104.
doi: 10.1590/0100-2945-103/15 URL |
[4] |
Carranca C, Brunetto G, Tagliavini M. 2018. Nitrogen nutrition of fruit trees to reconcile productivity and environmental concerns. Plants, 7(1):4.
doi: 10.3390/plants7010004 URL |
[5] | Chen Deng-wen, Li She-yi, Gao Ai-qin, Li Jia-rui. 2002. Affection of planting pattern of short shape interstock apple trees on root distribution root system growth and development and fruit quality. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, (4):6-8, 14. (in Chinese) |
陈登文, 李社义, 高爱琴, 李嘉瑞. 2002. 矮化中间砧苹果树定植方式对根系分布、生长及其果实品质的影响. 西北林学院学报, (4):6-8, 14. | |
[6] |
Chen Xiao-ying, Liu Peng, Cheng Yi, Dong Shu-ting, Zhang Ji-wang, Zhao Bin, Ren Bai-zhao, Han Kun. 2020. The root-layer regulation based on the depth of phosphate fertilizer application of summer maize improves soil nitrogen absorption and utilization. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 46(2):238-248. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93029 URL |
陈晓影, 刘鹏, 程乙, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 韩坤. 2020. 基于磷肥施用深度的夏玉米根层调控提高土壤氮素吸收利用. 作物学报, 46(2):238-248. | |
[7] | Ding Yi-fei. 2016. Effects of different nitrogen application levels on tree growth and sugar metabolism in leaf and fruit of Pyrus pyrifolia[M. D. Dissertation]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University. (in Chinese) |
丁易飞. 2016 不同施氮水平对砂梨生长及糖代谢的影响研究[硕士论文]. 南京:南京农业大学. | |
[8] | Fan Yu. 2019. Roots spatial distribution characteristics of M9T337 dwarfing self-rooted rootstock apple trees from different ages[M. D. Dissertation]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University. (in Chinese) |
樊雨. 2019. 不同树龄M9T337矮化自根砧苹果树根系空间分布特征[硕士论文]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学. | |
[9] | Gao Chen-xi, Liu Hang-kong, Han Ming-yu, Zhang Dong, Yang Jie. 2016. Growth dynamic and characteristics of root distribution of dwarfing self-rooted rootstock apple nursery. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 44(5):170-176. (in Chinese) |
高琛稀, 刘航空, 韩明玉, 张东, 杨杰. 2016. 矮化自根砧苹果苗木生长动态及其根系分布特征. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 44(5):170-176. | |
[10] | Hou Xin, Xu Xinxiang, Jia Zhihang, Yu Tianwu, Ge Shunfeng, Jiang Yuanmao. 2019. Effect of nitrogen supply levels on growth and expression of glutamine,glutamate and asparagine synthase genes of‘M9T337’apple rootstock. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 46(11):2239-2248. (in Chinese) |
侯昕, 徐新翔, 贾志航, 于天武, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 2019. 供氮水平对苹果砧木‘M9T337’幼苗生长和GS、GOGAT、AS基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 46(11):2239-2248. | |
[11] |
Hu F Q, Wang H Y, Mou P, Zhou J M. 2018. Nutrient composition and distance from point placement to the plant affect rice growth. Pedosphere, 28(1):124-134.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60393-X URL |
[12] |
Jiang Shang-tao, Wang Huo-yan, Zhou Jian-min, Chen Zhao- ming, Liu Xiao-wei, Jia Yun-sheng. 2016. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer application methods and types on the yield and phosphorus uptake of winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(5):1503-1510. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.034 pmid: 29732812 |
江尚焘, 王火焰, 周健民, 陈照明, 刘晓伟, 贾云生. 2016. 磷肥施用方式及类型对冬小麦产量和磷素吸收的影响. 应用生态学报, 27(5):1503-1510.
pmid: 29732812 |
|
[13] | Li Hong-bo, Xue Mu-yao, Lin Ya-ru, Shen Jian-bo. 2013. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and root foraging:from individual to community. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 19(4):995-1004. (in Chinese) |
李洪波, 薛慕瑶, 林雅茹, 申建波. 2013. 土壤养分空间异质性与根系觅食作用:从个体到群落. 植物营养与肥料学报, 19(4):995-1004. | |
[14] | Li Hui-feng, Lü De-guo, Li Lin-guang. 2009. Evolvement of root system architecture in apple. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 4(Supplement):323-326. (in Chinese) |
李慧峰, 吕德国, 李林光. 2009. 苹果根系构型的演化. 华北农学报, 4(增刊):323-326. | |
[15] | Li Jia, Lü Shen-qiang, Yang Ze-yu, Li Hui-tong, Wang Lü, Yang Ting, Wang Xiao-fei, Wang Lin-quan. 2020. Comprehensive effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield,economic performance and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize in Loess Plateau,China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 26(1):32-41. (in Chinese) |
李嘉, 吕慎强, 杨泽宇, 李惠通, 王吕, 阳婷, 王筱斐, 王林权. 2020. 氮肥运筹对黄土塬区春玉米产量、效益和氮肥利用率的综合效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 26(1):32-41. | |
[16] | Li Yong-hu, Cao Meng-lin, Du Hui-ling, Guo Ping-yi, Zhang Hai-ying, Guo Mei-jun, Yuan Xiang-yang. 2019. Effect of fertilization location and amount on dry matter accumulation,translocation and yield of hybrid millet. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 55(22):4177-4190. (in Chinese) |
李永虎, 曹梦琳, 杜慧玲, 郭平毅, 张海颖, 郭美俊, 原向阳. 2019. 施肥位置及施肥量对杂交谷子干物质累积、转运和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 52(22):4177-4190. | |
[17] |
Liu H, Fu Y M, Hu D W, Yu J, Liu H. 2018. Effect of green,yellow and purple radiation on biomass,photosynthesis,morphology and soluble sugar content of leafy lettuce via spectral wavebands“knock out”. Scientia Horticulturae, 236(16):10-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.027 URL |
[18] |
Liu Y X, Sun J H, Zhang F F, Li L. 2020. The plasticity of root distribution and nitrogen uptake contributes to recovery of maize growth at late growth stages in wheat/maize intercropping. Plant and Soil, 447(4):39-53.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04034-9 URL |
[19] |
Mou P, Robert H J, Tan Z Q, Bao Z, Chen H M. 2013. Morphological and physiological plasticity of plant roots when nutrients are both spatially and teporally heterogeneous. Plant and Soil, 364(1-2):373-384.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1336-y URL |
[20] |
Nacry P, Bouguyon E, Gojon A. 2013. Nitrogen acquisition by roots: physiological and developmental mechanisms ensuring plant adaptation to a fluctuating resource. Plant and Soil, 370(1-2):1-29.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1645-9 URL |
[21] | Peng Ling, Li Hui-feng, Cui Qian, Feng Lu, Ge Shun-feng, Jiang Yuan-mao. 2020. Effects of different nitrogen application methods on carbon and nitrogen utilization,yield and quality in Gala apple tree. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(1):249-254,261. (in Chinese) |
彭玲, 李慧峰, 崔倩, 冯璐, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 2020. 不同施氮方式对嘎啦苹果碳氮利用和产量品质的影响. 水土保持学报, 34(1):249-254,261. | |
[22] | Peng Ling, Yu Bo, Chen Qian, Ge Shun-feng, Jiang Yuan-mao. 2018. Growth response of apple dwarfing rootstock M9T337 seedlings regulated by endogenous hormone under different nitrogen supply. Plant Physiology Journal, 54(2):305-315. (in Chinese) |
彭玲, 于波, 陈倩, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 2018. 不同供氮方式下苹果矮化砧M9T337幼苗生长及内源激素的响应. 植物生理学报, 54(2):305-315. | |
[23] | Qi Dong-liang, Wu Xue, Hu Tian-tian. 2014. Effects of nitrogen supply methods on root growth,yield and nitrogen use of maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 47(14):2804-2813. (in Chinese) |
漆栋良, 吴雪, 胡田田. 2014. 施氮方式对玉米根系生长、产量和氮素利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 47(14):2804-2813. | |
[24] |
Ricardo F H G, Benjamin D G, Nicolaus V W. 2014. It’s time to make changes: modulation of root system architecture by nutrient signals. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(3):769-778.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert421 pmid: 24353245 |
[25] |
Shen J B, Li C J, Mi G H, Li L, Yuan L X, Jiang R F, Zhang F S. 2013. Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(5):1181-1192
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers342 URL |
[26] |
Sun Wen-tai, Ma Ming, Dong Tie, Liu Xing-lu, Zhao Ming-xin, Yin Xiao-ning, Niu Jun-qiang. 2016. Response of distribution pattern and physiological characteristics of apple roots grown in the dry area of Eastern Gansu to ground mulching. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(10):3153-3163. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.032 pmid: 29726140 |
孙文泰, 马明, 董铁, 刘兴禄, 赵明新, 尹晓宁, 牛军强. 2016. 陇东旱塬苹果根系分布规律及生理特性对地表覆盖的响应. 应用生态学报, 27(10):3153-3163.
pmid: 29726140 |
|
[27] |
Tian Ge, Wang Fen, Xu Xin-xiang, Jia Zhi-hang, Ge Shun-feng, Jiang Yuan-mao. 2018. Dynamics of growth and nitrogen accumulation and utilization of young apple trees. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(10):3319-3325. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.024 pmid: 30325157 |
田歌, 王芬, 徐新翔, 贾志航, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 2018. 富士苹果幼树生长与氮素积累和利用动态. 应用生态学报, 29(10):3319-3325.
pmid: 30325157 |
|
[28] | Tian Ge, Li Hui-feng, Zhu Zhan-ling, Chen Qian, Ren Yi-hua, Ge Shun-feng, Jiang Yuan-mao. 2020. Effects of different position of drip irrigation fertilization on nitrogen utilization and fruit yield and quality. China Fruits,(1):22-26. (in Chinese) |
田歌, 李慧峰, 朱占玲, 陈倩, 任饴华, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 2020. 不同位置滴灌施氮对苹果氮素利用及果实产量和品质的影响. 中国果树,(1):22-26. | |
[29] | Wang Cheng-qin. 2005. Growth rule of year-on and year-off apple trees and recommended cultivation practices. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, (3):35-39. (in Chinese) |
王承琴. 2005. 苹果大小年树生育规律与优质栽培. 山西农业科学, (3):35-39. | |
[30] | Wang Huo-yan, Zhou Jian-min. 2013. Root-zone fertilization—a key and necessary approach to improve fertilizer use efficiency and reduce non-point source pollution from the cropland. Soils, 45(5):785-790. (in Chinese) |
王火焰, 周健民. 2013. 根区施肥——提高肥料养分利用率和减少面源污染的关键和必需措施. 土壤, 45(5):785-790. | |
[31] |
Wang X X, Fu X L, Chen M, Huan L, Liu W H, Qi Y H, Gao Y G, Xiao W, Chen X D, Li L, Gao D S. 2018. Ultraviolet B irradiation influences the fruit quality and sucrose metabolism of peach(Prunus persica L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 153:286-301.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.04.015 URL |
[32] | Xu Hai-gang, Ji Meng-meng, Ge Shun-feng, Jiang Yuan-mao, Jiang Han, Chen Ru. 2015. Effect of different horizontal fertilizer placements on the characteristics of absorption,distribution and utilization of 15N by Gala/Malus hupehensis. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 21(5):1366-1372. (in Chinese) |
许海港, 季萌萌, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂, 姜翰, 陈汝. 2015. 不同水平位置施肥对‘嘎啦’苹果 15N吸收、分配与利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 21(5):1366-1372. | |
[33] | Yin Fei, Wang Jun-zhong, Sun Xiao-mei, Li Hong-qi, Fu Guo-zhan, Pei Rui-jie, Jiao Nian-yuan. 2017. Response of spatial concordance index between maize root and soil nitrate distribution to water and nitrogen treatments. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 50(11):2166-2178. (in Chinese) |
尹飞, 王俊忠, 孙笑梅, 李洪岐, 付国占, 裴瑞杰, 焦念元. 2017. 夏玉米根系与土壤硝态氮空间分布吻合度对水氮处理的响应. 中国农业科学, 50(11):2166-2178. | |
[34] | Zhang Dong, Zhang Bao-juan, Li Wen-qiang, Ma Juan-juan, Tan Ming, Du Jun-lan, Han Ming-yu. 2016. Characteristics of different scion-rootstock combinations on root development and distribution of apple sapling in the weibei loess highlands. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 43(4):623-632. (in Chinese) |
张东, 张宝娟, 李文强, 马娟娟, 檀鸣, 杜俊兰, 韩明玉. 2016. 渭北黄土高原苹果不同砧穗组合幼树根系发育和分布的特征. 园艺学报, 43(4):623-632. | |
[35] | Zhang Ren-tian, Ma Juan-juan, Sun Rui-feng, Gao Juan, Sun Xi-huan. 2019. Response of root growth of apple trees to different nitrogen levels under water storage pit irrigation. Water Saving Irrigation,(5):35-40. (in Chinese) |
张人天, 马娟娟, 孙瑞峰, 高娟, 孙西欢, 郭向红. 2019. 蓄水坑灌下苹果树根系生长对不同氮素水平的响应. 节水灌溉,(5):35-40. | |
[36] |
Zhao H, Li X Y, Jiang Y. 2019. Response of nitrogen losses to excessive nitrogen fertilizer application in intensive greenhouse vegetable production. Sustainability, 11(6):1513.
doi: 10.3390/su11061513 URL |
[37] | Zhao Shuai-xiang, Zhang Wei-feng, Jiang Yuan-mao, Zhang Fu-suo. 2017. Factors leading to excessive nitrogen fertilization on apple in the loess plateau. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 23(2):484-491. (in Chinese) |
赵帅翔, 张卫峰, 姜远茂, 张福锁. 2017. 黄土高原苹果过量施氮因素分析. 植物营养与肥料学报, 23(2):484-491. | |
[38] | Zheng Li-fang, Wu San-ding, Dang Ting-hui. 2019. Effects of different fertilization modes on spring maize yield,water use efficiency and nitrate nitrogen residue. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33(4):221-227. (in Chinese) |
郑利芳, 吴三鼎, 党廷辉. 2019. 不同施肥模式对春玉米产量、水分利用效率及硝态氮残留的影. 水土保持学报, 33(4):221-227. |
[1] | 于婷婷, 李 欢, 宁源生, 宋建飞, 彭璐琳, 贾竣淇, 张玮玮, 杨洪强. 苹果GRAS全基因组鉴定及其对生长素的响应分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 397-409. |
[2] | 孙瑞祥, 杨树德, 杨鹏, 韩建东, 宫志远. 豆秸、棉籽粕等栽培基质对金针菇生长和品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 91-102. |
[3] | 韩晓蕾, 张彩霞, 刘 锴, 杨 安, 严家帝, 李武兴, 康立群, 丛佩华. 中熟苹果新品种‘中苹优蕾’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 1-2. |
[4] | 黄 鹂, 陈财志, 余小林, 姚祥坦, 曹家树, . 早中熟普通白菜新品种‘浙大青’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 93-94. |
[5] | 郑积荣, 王同林, 胡松申. 高品质番茄新品种‘杭杂603’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 103-104. |
[6] | 郑积荣, 王同林. 番茄新品种‘杭杂601’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 105-106. |
[7] | 郑积荣, 王同林. 樱桃番茄新品种‘杭杂503’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 107-108. |
[8] | 韩晓蕾, 张彩霞, 刘 锴, 严家帝, 李武兴, 康立群, 丛佩华. 中熟苹果新品种‘苹优2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 1-2. |
[9] | 王 强, 丛佩华, 刘肖烽. 晚熟苹果新品种‘华优甜娃’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 3-4. |
[10] | 王 强, 丛佩华, 刘肖烽. 中熟苹果新品种‘华优宝蜜’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 5-6. |
[11] | 杨 玲, 丛佩华, 王 强, 李武兴, 康立群. 中熟鲜食苹果新品种‘华丰’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 7-8. |
[12] | 丁志杰, 包金波, 柔鲜古丽, 朱甜甜, 李雪丽, 苗浩宇, 田新民. 新疆野苹果与‘元帅’‘金冠’的叶绿体基因组比对研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(9): 1977-1990. |
[13] | 薛维文, 周显芳, 张昭其, 方方. 果蔬采后木质素积累及其调控对品质的影响研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(9): 2023-2036. |
[14] | 高彦龙, 吴玉霞, 张仲兴, 王双成, 张瑞, 张德, 王延秀. 苹果ELO家族基因鉴定及其在低温胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(8): 1621-1636. |
[15] | 郑晓东, 袭祥利, 李玉琪, 孙志娟, 马长青, 韩明三, 李少旋, 田义轲, 王彩虹. 油菜素内酯对盐碱胁迫下平邑甜茶幼苗生长的影响及调控机理研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(7): 1401-1414. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司