Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 908-920.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0448
• Genetic & Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Biology • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Zhuang, FANG Chenxi, LIU Yating, WANG Yutong, XUE Linlei, SHI Jiaxin, REN Tianfang, ZHANG Junwei, BAO Manzhu, ZHANG Jie*()
Received:
2024-12-25
Revised:
2025-01-24
Online:
2025-05-08
Published:
2025-04-25
Contact:
ZHANG Jie
TIAN Zhuang, FANG Chenxi, LIU Yating, WANG Yutong, XUE Linlei, SHI Jiaxin, REN Tianfang, ZHANG Junwei, BAO Manzhu, ZHANG Jie. Construction of Transient Transformation System of Petals in Prunus mume[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(4): 908-920.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0448
Fig. 1 Flower morphology at four developmental stages of Prunus mume‘Xuemei’ Balloon stage:The buds are loose but the petals are not spread;Initial blooming stage:Some of the petals are slightly spread;Bowl stage:The petals are half spread;Blooming stage:The petals are fully spread and abundant
引物名称Primer | 序列(5′-3′)Sequence |
---|---|
ANS-T | F:ATGGTGAGCTCTGATTCAGTGG;R:TCACTTGTTGAGCAGAGCCTC |
pBI-PmANS | F:GAGAACACGGGGGAC TCTAGAATGGTGAGCTCTGATTCAGTGGA; |
R:ATAAGGGACTGACCA CCCGGGTCACTTGTTGAGCAGAGCCTCTT | |
ANS(121) | F:ATGGTGAGCTCTGATTCAGTGG;R:ACTTTTCCCGGCAATAACATACGG |
ANS-1-2 | F:CCAGGCCTCTGGCAAAATTC;R:GGCCAAATGGACAAGTCACG |
Table 1 Primers sequence used in this study
引物名称Primer | 序列(5′-3′)Sequence |
---|---|
ANS-T | F:ATGGTGAGCTCTGATTCAGTGG;R:TCACTTGTTGAGCAGAGCCTC |
pBI-PmANS | F:GAGAACACGGGGGAC TCTAGAATGGTGAGCTCTGATTCAGTGGA; |
R:ATAAGGGACTGACCA CCCGGGTCACTTGTTGAGCAGAGCCTCTT | |
ANS(121) | F:ATGGTGAGCTCTGATTCAGTGG;R:ACTTTTCCCGGCAATAACATACGG |
ANS-1-2 | F:CCAGGCCTCTGGCAAAATTC;R:GGCCAAATGGACAAGTCACG |
侵染方式 Infection mode | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material-necrosis rate | GUS-1等级占比/% GUS-1 grade proportion | GUS-2等级占比/% GUS-2 grade proportion | GUS-3等级占比/% GUS-3 grade proportion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
活体注射In vivo injection | 49.33 ± 9.23 ab | 18.67 ± 6.11 ab | 37.33 ± 10.01 a | 10.67 ± 4.61 ab | 1.33 ± 1.01 a |
带枝水培Hydroponics with branches | 49.34 ± 10.58 a | 12.00 ± 4 ab | 38.67 ± 8.33 a | 4.00 ± 3.93 b | 6.67 ± 4.62 a |
整花真空Whole flower vacuum | 66.67 ± 18.33 a | 21.33 ± 6.11 a | 33.33 ± 6.11 a | 24.00 ± 13.86 a | 9.33 ± 8.33 a |
花瓣真空Petal vacuum | 10.67 ± 9.24 b | 0 b | 10.67 ± 9.24 b | 0 b | 0 a |
Table 2 GUS transient expression rate,material necrosis rate and GUS grade proportion of Prunus mume‘Xuemei’ petals under different infection modes
侵染方式 Infection mode | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material-necrosis rate | GUS-1等级占比/% GUS-1 grade proportion | GUS-2等级占比/% GUS-2 grade proportion | GUS-3等级占比/% GUS-3 grade proportion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
活体注射In vivo injection | 49.33 ± 9.23 ab | 18.67 ± 6.11 ab | 37.33 ± 10.01 a | 10.67 ± 4.61 ab | 1.33 ± 1.01 a |
带枝水培Hydroponics with branches | 49.34 ± 10.58 a | 12.00 ± 4 ab | 38.67 ± 8.33 a | 4.00 ± 3.93 b | 6.67 ± 4.62 a |
整花真空Whole flower vacuum | 66.67 ± 18.33 a | 21.33 ± 6.11 a | 33.33 ± 6.11 a | 24.00 ± 13.86 a | 9.33 ± 8.33 a |
花瓣真空Petal vacuum | 10.67 ± 9.24 b | 0 b | 10.67 ± 9.24 b | 0 b | 0 a |
侵染时间/min Infection time | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material necrosis rate | GUS-1等级占比/% GUS-1 grade proportion | GUS-2等级占比/% GUS-2 grade proportion | GUS-3等级占比/% GUS-3 grade proportion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 34.67 ± 2.31 a | 20.00 ± 6.11 a | 34.67 ± 2.31 a | 0 b | 0 a |
15 | 45.34 ± 6.66 a | 13.33 ± 4.00 a | 38.67 ± 8.33 a | 6.67 ± 4.62 a | 0 a |
20 | 42.67 ± 9.24 a | 29.33 ± 6.11 a | 42.67 ± 9.24 a | 0 b | 0 a |
30 | 45.33 ± 10.07 a | 29.33 ± 6.11 a | 45.33 ± 10.07 b | 0 b | 0 a |
Table 3 GUS transient expression rate,material necrosis rate and GUS grade proportion of‘Xuemei’petals under different infection time
侵染时间/min Infection time | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material necrosis rate | GUS-1等级占比/% GUS-1 grade proportion | GUS-2等级占比/% GUS-2 grade proportion | GUS-3等级占比/% GUS-3 grade proportion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 34.67 ± 2.31 a | 20.00 ± 6.11 a | 34.67 ± 2.31 a | 0 b | 0 a |
15 | 45.34 ± 6.66 a | 13.33 ± 4.00 a | 38.67 ± 8.33 a | 6.67 ± 4.62 a | 0 a |
20 | 42.67 ± 9.24 a | 29.33 ± 6.11 a | 42.67 ± 9.24 a | 0 b | 0 a |
30 | 45.33 ± 10.07 a | 29.33 ± 6.11 a | 45.33 ± 10.07 b | 0 b | 0 a |
发育阶段 Development stage | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material necrosis rate | GUS-1等级占比/% GUS-1 grade proportion | GUS-2等级占比/% GUS-2 grade proportion | GUS-3等级占/% GUS-3 grade proportion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
气球期Balloon stage | 49.33 ± 8 b | 17.33 ± 2.31 a | 45.33 ± 2.31 a | 4.00 ± 0 a | 0 a |
初开期Initial blooming stage | 77.33 ± 10.07 a | 20.00 ± 2.31 ab | 57.33 ± 10.07 a | 14.67 ± 12.22 a | 5.33 ± 5.11 a |
碗状期Bowl stage | 66.67 ± 2.31 b | 17.33 ± 2.31 c | 57.33 ± 9.24 a | 5.33 ± 5.11 a | 4.00 ± 0 a |
盛开期Blooming stage | 49.33 ± 9.24 b | 6.67 ± 4.62 bc | 46.67 ± 6.11 a | 2.67 ± 2.31 a | 0 a |
Table 4 GUS transient expression rate,material necrosis rate and GUS grade proportion of Prunus mume‘Xuemei’petals under different development stages
发育阶段 Development stage | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material necrosis rate | GUS-1等级占比/% GUS-1 grade proportion | GUS-2等级占比/% GUS-2 grade proportion | GUS-3等级占/% GUS-3 grade proportion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
气球期Balloon stage | 49.33 ± 8 b | 17.33 ± 2.31 a | 45.33 ± 2.31 a | 4.00 ± 0 a | 0 a |
初开期Initial blooming stage | 77.33 ± 10.07 a | 20.00 ± 2.31 ab | 57.33 ± 10.07 a | 14.67 ± 12.22 a | 5.33 ± 5.11 a |
碗状期Bowl stage | 66.67 ± 2.31 b | 17.33 ± 2.31 c | 57.33 ± 9.24 a | 5.33 ± 5.11 a | 4.00 ± 0 a |
盛开期Blooming stage | 49.33 ± 9.24 b | 6.67 ± 4.62 bc | 46.67 ± 6.11 a | 2.67 ± 2.31 a | 0 a |
Fig. 5 GUS transient expression rate and material necrosis rate in Prunus mume petals of different genotypes A-W:‘Caowang Huangxiang’,‘Danfen Chuizhi’,‘Baige Gongfen’,‘Bianban Dahong’,‘Erlü’e’,‘Xiaoguli Hong’,‘Liuban Hong’,‘Fentai Chuizhi’,‘Jiangnan Taige’,‘Xiaohong Zhusha’,‘Moshan Xiaomei’,‘Sanlun Yudie’,‘Danhanhong’,‘Jiangnan’,‘Fenzhuang Taige’,‘Hanhong’,‘Bianlü’e’,‘Wuxi Danxing’,‘Liubanmei’,‘Taige Gongfen’,‘Tieguhong’,‘Duo’e Zhusha’,‘Wuyuyu’,the same below. Different lowercase letters in the same data indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level
编号 No. | 菌株类型 Agrobacterium strain | OD600 | 共培养时间/d Co-cultivation time | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material necrosis rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | EHA105 | 0.4 | 1 | 0 c | 0 d |
2 | EHA105 | 0.6 | 5 | 32.67 ± 5.03 a | 28.00 ± 2.00 b |
3 | EHA105 | 0.8 | 3 | 28.33 ± 11.15 ab | 25.00 ± 3.61 bc |
4 | GV3101 | 0.4 | 5 | 20.67 ± 2.31 b | 26.67 ± 5.13 bc |
5 | GV3101 | 0.6 | 3 | 26.00 ± 3.00 ab | 21.00 ± 2.00 c |
6 | GV3101 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 c | 0 d |
7 | EHA105 | 0.4 | 3 | 27.00 ± 7.21 ab | 21.33 ± 4.93 bc |
8 | EHA105 | 0.6 | 1 | 0 c | 0 d |
9 | EHA105 | 0.8 | 5 | 26.00 ± 2.65 ab | 37.33 ± 7.02 a |
K1(G) | 20.333 | 15.890 | 0 | ||
K2(G) | 15.557 | 19.557 | 27.110 | ||
K3(G) | 17.667 | 18.110 | 26.447 | ||
R(G) | 4.776 | 3.667 | 27.110 | ||
K1(M) | 17.667 | 16.000 | 0 | ||
K2(M) | 15.890 | 16.333 | 22.443 | ||
K3(M) | 19.553 | 20.777 | 30.667 | ||
R(M) | 3.663 | 4.777 | 30.667 |
Table 5 Effects of different infection conditions on GUS transient expression rate and material necrosis rate of‘Xuemei’petals
编号 No. | 菌株类型 Agrobacterium strain | OD600 | 共培养时间/d Co-cultivation time | GUS瞬时表达率/% GUS transient expression rate | 材料坏死率/% Material necrosis rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | EHA105 | 0.4 | 1 | 0 c | 0 d |
2 | EHA105 | 0.6 | 5 | 32.67 ± 5.03 a | 28.00 ± 2.00 b |
3 | EHA105 | 0.8 | 3 | 28.33 ± 11.15 ab | 25.00 ± 3.61 bc |
4 | GV3101 | 0.4 | 5 | 20.67 ± 2.31 b | 26.67 ± 5.13 bc |
5 | GV3101 | 0.6 | 3 | 26.00 ± 3.00 ab | 21.00 ± 2.00 c |
6 | GV3101 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 c | 0 d |
7 | EHA105 | 0.4 | 3 | 27.00 ± 7.21 ab | 21.33 ± 4.93 bc |
8 | EHA105 | 0.6 | 1 | 0 c | 0 d |
9 | EHA105 | 0.8 | 5 | 26.00 ± 2.65 ab | 37.33 ± 7.02 a |
K1(G) | 20.333 | 15.890 | 0 | ||
K2(G) | 15.557 | 19.557 | 27.110 | ||
K3(G) | 17.667 | 18.110 | 26.447 | ||
R(G) | 4.776 | 3.667 | 27.110 | ||
K1(M) | 17.667 | 16.000 | 0 | ||
K2(M) | 15.890 | 16.333 | 22.443 | ||
K3(M) | 19.553 | 20.777 | 30.667 | ||
R(M) | 3.663 | 4.777 | 30.667 |
Fig. 7 Effects of different orthogonal treatments on GUS transient expression in Prunus mume petals 1-9:GUS staining results under the corresponding orthogonal experiment numbered treatments
[1] |
|
包菲, 张启翔, 程堂仁, 潘会堂, 王佳, 孙丽丹, 马开峰, 杨炜茹, 周育真. 2015. 一种用植物花瓣细胞原生质体表达蛋白的方法. 中国专利, CN104830896A. 2015-8-12.
|
|
[2] |
|
陈俊愉. 2010. 中国梅花品种图志. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
|
|
[3] |
|
丁安琪. 2021. 梅花抗寒性比较分析及关键差异基因的功能研究[博士论文]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
|
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
李刚, 宋平丽, 王翔, 马青翠, 张海霞, 张玉星, 许建锋, 亓宝秀. 2021. 农杆菌介导的杜梨叶片瞬时转化方法的建立. 果树学报, 38 (11):2006-2013.
|
|
[8] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
孟妮, 刘雅莉, 窦雪溪, 刘红利, 李方殷. 2018. 蝴蝶兰花瓣瞬时转化体系建立. 西北植物学报, 38 (6):1017-1023.
|
|
[12] |
|
潘佳佳, 张东梅, 孟建, 高苏南, 朱凯杰, 刘军伟, 李国怀. 2023. 李坏死环斑病毒诱导的桃PpPDS沉默体系的优化及验证. 园艺学报, 50 (7):1587-1600.
|
|
[13] |
|
沙占浩. 2017. 梅花子叶再生体系优化及PmCBFs的遗传转化研究[硕士论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学.
|
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
闻娟. 2009. 梅花再生体系建立及遗传转化初步研究[硕士论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学.
|
|
[16] |
|
吴洁萍. 2023. 葡萄愈伤瞬时转化体系的建立与抗寒候选基因功能研究[硕士论文]. 银川: 宁夏大学.
|
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
吴水涵. 2023. 农杆菌介导的雪落樱瞬时遗传转化体系的初步构建[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京林业大学.
|
|
[19] |
|
吴思惠, 朱欢欢, 张俊卫, 包满珠, 张杰. 2023. 梅花不同花色品种及开花阶段类黄酮代谢物测定与分析. 中国农业科学, 56 (9):1760-1774.
|
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
张俊卫, 杨洁, 闻娟, 张蔚, 包满珠. 2013. 农杆菌介导梅花成熟子叶再生体系的遗传转化方法. 中国专利, CN103215307A. 2013-07-24.
|
|
[22] |
|
张曼, 张启翔, 程文辉, 程堂仁, 王佳. 2023. 一种TRV载体介导病毒诱导梅花花芽基因沉默的方法. 中国专利, CN116904499A. 2023-10-20.
|
|
[23] |
|
[9] |
|
[1] | LIU Jianbin, ZHANG Yan. A New Syringa vulgaris Cultivar‘Ziyi’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 265-266. |
[2] | ZHAO Zeyang, ZHOU Yuqing, LIN Deshu, REN Huibo. Advances in Morphogenesis of Petal Conical Epidermal Cells [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(7): 1695-1706. |
[3] | WANG Wenyu, WANG Jiayin, DU Tingting, ZHANG Jingjing, ZHANG Chao, XIN Cuihua, GUO Jiangbo, PEI Haixia. Cloning of RhRNF185-like Gene from Rose and Its Effect on Petal Senescence [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(5): 1047-1055. |
[4] | YANG Dong, LIU Yanling, XU Liming , and YANG Mei, . A New Ornamental Cultivar Lotus‘Sai Lingxiao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 155-156. |
[5] | YANG Dong, LIU Yanling , XU Liming , DENG Xianbao, and YANG Mei, . A New Ornamental Cultivar Lotus‘Qiu Mudan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 157-158. |
[6] | ZHANG Hui, SHI Maoyin, , XIAO Nan , ZHOU Xiaoan , NI Weiting , and ZHOU Weixin. A New Loropetalum chinense Cultivar‘Qingyuan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 181-182. |
[7] | LIU Jiaqi, GONG Feifei, ZHANG Hao, JING Weikun, QU Suping, MA Nan, GAO Junping, SUN Xiaoming. Jasmonic Acid Carboxy Methyltransferase Gene RhJMT Regulates Petal Senescence in Rosa hybrida [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(5): 1025-1036. |
[8] | Yuan Xi, Zhang Man, Ma Kaifeng, Wang Jia, Zhang Qixiang. Function and Expression Regulation Analysis of Prunus mume PmMYB21 During Filament Elongation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(5): 1048-1062. |
[9] | GAO Chengyu, WANG Yiheng, JIN Jiangzhou, LI Tao, LI Jindou, ZHOU Mengyao, ZHANG Haixia, MA Hui, ZHANG Yuxing, QI Baoxiu, XU Jianfeng. Method for High Efficiency Isolation of Protoplasts from Pear Leaves and Its Utility for Gene Transient Expression [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(5): 1141-1150. |
[10] | LI Maofu, YANG Yuan, WANG Hua, FAN Youwei, SUN Pei, JIN Wanmei. Analysis the Function of R2R3 MYB Transcription Factor RhMYB113c on Regulating Anthocyanin Synthesis in Rosa hybrida [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(9): 1957-1966. |
[11] | HU Xijun, JIN Xiaoling, XING Wen, ZHANG Zhe, LI Weidong, HUANG Guolin. A New Michelia platypetala Cultivar‘Fenyun’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7): 1619-1620. |
[12] | LIU Yaoyao, WU Yanyan, Shi Yan, MAO Tianyu, BAO Manzhu, ZHANG Junwei, ZHANG Jie. Preliminary Study on the Relationship Between Promoter Sequence Difference of PmTAC1 and Weeping Trait of Prunus mume [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6): 1327-1338. |
[13] | DENG Jiao, SU Mengyue, LIU Xuelian, OU Kefang, HU Zhengrong, YANG Pingfang. Transcriptome Analysis Revealed the Formation Mechanism of Floral Color of Lotus‘Dasajin’with Bicolor Petal [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(2): 365-377. |
[14] | TANG Fei, WANG Jingjing, YU Linjie, SHI Dan, LIU Bin, CHEN Zhu, and GAO Junlan. A New Ornamental Lotus Cultivar‘Dongli Jiase’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(S2): 2947-2948. |
[15] | HONG Yanhong, YE Qinghua, LI Zekun, WANG Wei, XIE Qian, CHEN Qingxi, CHEN Jianqing. Accumulation of Anthocyanins in Red-flowered Strawberry‘Meihong’Petals and Expression Analysis of MYB Gene [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(8): 1470-1484. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd