Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1201-1215.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0427
• Genetic & Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Biology • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Qixuan1,2, LI Xiaoying2, WU Junkai1,3, GE Hang2, CHEN Junwei2,*(), XU Hongxia2,*(
)
Received:
2024-01-27
Revised:
2024-03-26
Online:
2024-12-18
Published:
2024-06-21
Contact:
CHEN Junwei, XU Hongxia
ZHU Qixuan, LI Xiaoying, WU Junkai, GE Hang, CHEN Junwei, XU Hongxia. Genetic Tendency Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of the Fruit Traits in Loquat F1 Generation[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1201-1215.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0427
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
质量/g Weight | 33.65 | 32.24 | 32.94 | 31.00 | 17.36 ~ 57.83 | 30.37 | 94.10 | -5.90 | 35.00 | 61.00 |
可溶性固形物/% Total soluble solids(TSS) | 13.96 | 13.37 | 13.67 | 13.67 | 9.84 ~ 20.13 | 11.96 | 99.98 | -0.02 | 42.00 | 41.00 |
可滴定酸/% Titrable acid(TA) | 0.31 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.45 | 0.08 ~ 1.97 | 80.89 | 197.57 | 97.57 | 64.00 | 11.00 |
固酸比TSS/TA | 45.58 | 87.93 | 66.75 | 46.14 | 6.37 ~ 173.24 | 68.65 | 69.12 | -30.88 | 10.00 | 62.00 |
Table 1 Genetic variation analysis of quality traits in F1 generation fruits of loquat‘Ninghaibai’and‘Oobusa’
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
质量/g Weight | 33.65 | 32.24 | 32.94 | 31.00 | 17.36 ~ 57.83 | 30.37 | 94.10 | -5.90 | 35.00 | 61.00 |
可溶性固形物/% Total soluble solids(TSS) | 13.96 | 13.37 | 13.67 | 13.67 | 9.84 ~ 20.13 | 11.96 | 99.98 | -0.02 | 42.00 | 41.00 |
可滴定酸/% Titrable acid(TA) | 0.31 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.45 | 0.08 ~ 1.97 | 80.89 | 197.57 | 97.57 | 64.00 | 11.00 |
固酸比TSS/TA | 45.58 | 87.93 | 66.75 | 46.14 | 6.37 ~ 173.24 | 68.65 | 69.12 | -30.88 | 10.00 | 62.00 |
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L* | 58.80 | 68.06 | 63.43 | 62.38 | 56.28 ~ 68.79 | 4.22 | 98.33 | -1.67 | 1.00 | 9.00 |
C* | 37.30 | 16.63 | 26.97 | 27.62 | 18.40 ~ 41.03 | 18.20 | 102.44 | 2.44 | 7.00 | 0 |
H* | 62.98 | 82.51 | 72.74 | 77.13 | 63.32 ~ 83.72 | 8.31 | 106.03 | 6.03 | 7.00 | 0 |
Table 2 Genetic variation analysis of color in F1 generation fruits of loquat‘Ninghaibai’and‘Oobusa’
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L* | 58.80 | 68.06 | 63.43 | 62.38 | 56.28 ~ 68.79 | 4.22 | 98.33 | -1.67 | 1.00 | 9.00 |
C* | 37.30 | 16.63 | 26.97 | 27.62 | 18.40 ~ 41.03 | 18.20 | 102.44 | 2.44 | 7.00 | 0 |
H* | 62.98 | 82.51 | 72.74 | 77.13 | 63.32 ~ 83.72 | 8.31 | 106.03 | 6.03 | 7.00 | 0 |
Fig. 3 Frequency histogram(left)and normal Q-Q plot(right)of F1 generation fruit secondary metabolism functional components of loquat‘Ninghaibai’and‘Oobusa’
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
类胡萝卜素/(mg · kg-1)Carotenoid | 129.94 | 18.09 | 74.01 | 47.06 | 12.53 ~ 165.48 | 92.32 | 63.58 | -36.42 | 8.00 | 9.00 |
总酚/(mg · kg-1) Total phenolic | 1 185.18 | 1 128.43 | 1 156.81 | 872.78 | 392.38 ~ 1 622.04 | 28.41 | 75.45 | -24.55 | 12.00 | 84.00 |
类黄酮/(mg · kg-1)Flavonoids | 173.40 | 155.53 | 164.46 | 120.37 | 14.16 ~ 208.23 | 32.16 | 73.19 | -26.81 | 7.00 | 82.00 |
Table 3 Genetic variation analysis of secondary metabolic functional component content in F1 generation fruits of loquat‘Ninghaibai’and‘Oobusa’
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
类胡萝卜素/(mg · kg-1)Carotenoid | 129.94 | 18.09 | 74.01 | 47.06 | 12.53 ~ 165.48 | 92.32 | 63.58 | -36.42 | 8.00 | 9.00 |
总酚/(mg · kg-1) Total phenolic | 1 185.18 | 1 128.43 | 1 156.81 | 872.78 | 392.38 ~ 1 622.04 | 28.41 | 75.45 | -24.55 | 12.00 | 84.00 |
类黄酮/(mg · kg-1)Flavonoids | 173.40 | 155.53 | 164.46 | 120.37 | 14.16 ~ 208.23 | 32.16 | 73.19 | -26.81 | 7.00 | 82.00 |
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
果胶/(mg · g-1)Pectin | 4.81 | 12.06 | 8.44 | 4.65 | 2.13 ~ 7.51 | 24.38 | 55.06 | -44.94 | 0.00 | 47.00 |
细胞壁纤维素/(mg · g-1)Cellulose | 156.42 | 121.06 | 138.74 | 149.47 | 47.39 ~ 329.84 | 30.89 | 107.73 | 7.73 | 27.00 | 15.00 |
总半纤维素/(mg · g-1) Total hemicellulose | 461.46 | 452.76 | 457.11 | 352.41 | 86.03 ~ 700.87 | 23.68 | 77.10 | -22.90 | 9.00 | 91.00 |
总木质素/(mg · g-1) Total lignin | 62.99 | 67.09 | 65.04 | 38.86 | 0.16 ~ 148.44 | 71.17 | 59.75 | -40.25 | 16.00 | 79.00 |
Table 4 Genetic variation analysis of cell wall component content in F1 generation fruits of loquat‘Ninghaibai’and‘Oobusa’
性状 Character | 大房 Oobusa | 宁海白 Ninghaibai | 中亲值 Midparent value | F1 | 分离范围 Separation range | CV/% | 遗传力/% Ta | 优势率/% H | 超高亲/% HH | 低低亲/% L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
果胶/(mg · g-1)Pectin | 4.81 | 12.06 | 8.44 | 4.65 | 2.13 ~ 7.51 | 24.38 | 55.06 | -44.94 | 0.00 | 47.00 |
细胞壁纤维素/(mg · g-1)Cellulose | 156.42 | 121.06 | 138.74 | 149.47 | 47.39 ~ 329.84 | 30.89 | 107.73 | 7.73 | 27.00 | 15.00 |
总半纤维素/(mg · g-1) Total hemicellulose | 461.46 | 452.76 | 457.11 | 352.41 | 86.03 ~ 700.87 | 23.68 | 77.10 | -22.90 | 9.00 | 91.00 |
总木质素/(mg · g-1) Total lignin | 62.99 | 67.09 | 65.04 | 38.86 | 0.16 ~ 148.44 | 71.17 | 59.75 | -40.25 | 16.00 | 79.00 |
性状 Trait | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | -0.368** | 0.185 | -0.082 | 0.271** | 0.330** | -0.310** | 0.296** | 0.197* | -0.390** | -0.484** | 0.036 | 0.273** | -0.043 |
x2 | -0.368** | 1 | -0.038 | 0.172 | 0.011 | -0.129 | 0.209* | -0.149 | 0.093 | 0.115 | 0.365** | -0.154 | -0.170 | 0.075 |
x3 | 0.185 | -0.038 | 1 | -0.630** | 0.329** | 0.005 | 0.158 | -0.086 | -0.096 | 0.101 | -0.010 | 0.081 | 0.022 | 0.121 |
x4 | -0.082 | 0.172 | -0.630** | 1 | -0.231* | 0.082 | -0.229* | 0.118 | 0.208* | -0.108 | 0.045 | -0.170 | -0.019 | -0.100 |
x5 | 0.271** | 0.011 | 0.329** | -0.231* | 1 | -0.092 | 0.307** | -0.253* | -0.047 | -0.026 | 0.003 | -0.052 | 0.081 | 0.062 |
x6 | 0.330** | -0.129 | 0.005 | 0.082 | -0.092 | 1 | -0.826** | 0.804** | 0.315** | -0.507** | 0.024 | -0.003 | 0.312** | 0.045 |
x7 | -0.310** | 0.209* | 0.158 | -0.229* | 0.307** | -0.826** | 1 | -0.866** | -0.277** | 0.390** | 0.056 | 0.064 | -0.148 | 0.071 |
x8 | 0.296** | -0.149 | -0.086 | 0.118 | -0.253* | 0.804** | -0.866** | 1 | 0.278** | -0.419** | -0.008 | -0.013 | 0.221* | -0.040 |
x9 | 0.197* | 0.093 | -0.096 | 0.208* | -0.047 | 0.315** | -0.277** | 0.278** | 1 | -0.136 | 0.101 | -0.164 | 0.220* | -0.059 |
x10 | -0.390** | 0.115 | 0.101 | -0.108 | -0.026 | -0.507** | 0.390** | -0.419** | -0.136 | 1 | 0.199* | -0.019 | -0.362** | 0.068 |
x11 | -0.484** | 0.365** | -0.010 | 0.045 | 0.003 | 0.024 | 0.056 | -0.008 | 0.101 | 0.199* | 1 | -0.031 | 0.001 | 0.276** |
x12 | 0.036 | -0.154 | 0.081 | -0.170 | -0.052 | -0.003 | 0.064 | -0.013 | -0.164 | -0.019 | -0.031 | 1 | 0.465** | -0.097 |
x13 | 0.273** | -0.170 | 0.022 | -0.019 | 0.081 | 0.312** | -0.148 | 0.221* | 0.220* | -0.362** | 0.001 | 0.465** | 1 | -0.016 |
x14 | -0.043 | 0.075 | 0.121 | -0.100 | 0.062 | 0.045 | 0.071 | -0.040 | -0.059 | 0.068 | 0.276** | -0.097 | -0.016 | 1 |
Table 5 Correlation between F1 generation fruit traits of loquat‘Ninghaibai’and‘Oobusa’
性状 Trait | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | -0.368** | 0.185 | -0.082 | 0.271** | 0.330** | -0.310** | 0.296** | 0.197* | -0.390** | -0.484** | 0.036 | 0.273** | -0.043 |
x2 | -0.368** | 1 | -0.038 | 0.172 | 0.011 | -0.129 | 0.209* | -0.149 | 0.093 | 0.115 | 0.365** | -0.154 | -0.170 | 0.075 |
x3 | 0.185 | -0.038 | 1 | -0.630** | 0.329** | 0.005 | 0.158 | -0.086 | -0.096 | 0.101 | -0.010 | 0.081 | 0.022 | 0.121 |
x4 | -0.082 | 0.172 | -0.630** | 1 | -0.231* | 0.082 | -0.229* | 0.118 | 0.208* | -0.108 | 0.045 | -0.170 | -0.019 | -0.100 |
x5 | 0.271** | 0.011 | 0.329** | -0.231* | 1 | -0.092 | 0.307** | -0.253* | -0.047 | -0.026 | 0.003 | -0.052 | 0.081 | 0.062 |
x6 | 0.330** | -0.129 | 0.005 | 0.082 | -0.092 | 1 | -0.826** | 0.804** | 0.315** | -0.507** | 0.024 | -0.003 | 0.312** | 0.045 |
x7 | -0.310** | 0.209* | 0.158 | -0.229* | 0.307** | -0.826** | 1 | -0.866** | -0.277** | 0.390** | 0.056 | 0.064 | -0.148 | 0.071 |
x8 | 0.296** | -0.149 | -0.086 | 0.118 | -0.253* | 0.804** | -0.866** | 1 | 0.278** | -0.419** | -0.008 | -0.013 | 0.221* | -0.040 |
x9 | 0.197* | 0.093 | -0.096 | 0.208* | -0.047 | 0.315** | -0.277** | 0.278** | 1 | -0.136 | 0.101 | -0.164 | 0.220* | -0.059 |
x10 | -0.390** | 0.115 | 0.101 | -0.108 | -0.026 | -0.507** | 0.390** | -0.419** | -0.136 | 1 | 0.199* | -0.019 | -0.362** | 0.068 |
x11 | -0.484** | 0.365** | -0.010 | 0.045 | 0.003 | 0.024 | 0.056 | -0.008 | 0.101 | 0.199* | 1 | -0.031 | 0.001 | 0.276** |
x12 | 0.036 | -0.154 | 0.081 | -0.170 | -0.052 | -0.003 | 0.064 | -0.013 | -0.164 | -0.019 | -0.031 | 1 | 0.465** | -0.097 |
x13 | 0.273** | -0.170 | 0.022 | -0.019 | 0.081 | 0.312** | -0.148 | 0.221* | 0.220* | -0.362** | 0.001 | 0.465** | 1 | -0.016 |
x14 | -0.043 | 0.075 | 0.121 | -0.100 | 0.062 | 0.045 | 0.071 | -0.040 | -0.059 | 0.068 | 0.276** | -0.097 | -0.016 | 1 |
性状 Character | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
果实质量 Fruit weight | -0.520 | -0.529 | 0.035 | 0.148 | 0.428 |
可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids(TSS) | 0.289 | 0.458 | -0.358 | -0.004 | 0.050 |
可滴定酸 Titrable acid(TA) | -0.147 | 0.681 | 0.368 | -0.282 | 0.218 |
固酸比 TSS/TA | -0.192 | 0.709 | 0.190 | -0.195 | 0.388 |
L* | 0.245 | -0.460 | -0.382 | 0.042 | 0.564 |
C* | 0.873 | -0.007 | 0.215 | -0.122 | 0.182 |
H* | 0.886 | -0.189 | 0.024 | -0.175 | 0.221 |
类胡萝卜素 Carotenoid | -0.872 | 0.122 | -0.125 | 0.126 | -0.249 |
总酚 Total phenolic | -0.406 | 0.255 | -0.350 | -0.063 | 0.378 |
类黄酮 Flavonoids | 0.609 | 0.152 | -0.047 | 0.066 | -0.287 |
果胶 Pectin | -0.222 | -0.388 | 0.674 | 0.266 | 0.097 |
细胞壁纤维素 Cellulose | 0.059 | 0.382 | -0.137 | 0.738 | 0.349 |
总半纤维素 Total hemicellulose | 0.419 | 0.288 | 0.228 | 0.714 | -0.109 |
总木质素 Total lignin | -0.105 | -0.021 | 0.600 | -0.104 | 0.192 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 3.556 | 2.187 | 1.520 | 1.346 | 1.250 |
方差贡献率/% Rate of variance | 25.399 | 15.624 | 10.854 | 9.616 | 8.931 |
累计贡献率/% Rate of cumulative variances | 25.399 | 41.023 | 51.877 | 61.493 | 70.424 |
Table 6 Factor loading,coefficient eigenvalues and variance contribution rates of principal components(PC)
性状 Character | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
果实质量 Fruit weight | -0.520 | -0.529 | 0.035 | 0.148 | 0.428 |
可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids(TSS) | 0.289 | 0.458 | -0.358 | -0.004 | 0.050 |
可滴定酸 Titrable acid(TA) | -0.147 | 0.681 | 0.368 | -0.282 | 0.218 |
固酸比 TSS/TA | -0.192 | 0.709 | 0.190 | -0.195 | 0.388 |
L* | 0.245 | -0.460 | -0.382 | 0.042 | 0.564 |
C* | 0.873 | -0.007 | 0.215 | -0.122 | 0.182 |
H* | 0.886 | -0.189 | 0.024 | -0.175 | 0.221 |
类胡萝卜素 Carotenoid | -0.872 | 0.122 | -0.125 | 0.126 | -0.249 |
总酚 Total phenolic | -0.406 | 0.255 | -0.350 | -0.063 | 0.378 |
类黄酮 Flavonoids | 0.609 | 0.152 | -0.047 | 0.066 | -0.287 |
果胶 Pectin | -0.222 | -0.388 | 0.674 | 0.266 | 0.097 |
细胞壁纤维素 Cellulose | 0.059 | 0.382 | -0.137 | 0.738 | 0.349 |
总半纤维素 Total hemicellulose | 0.419 | 0.288 | 0.228 | 0.714 | -0.109 |
总木质素 Total lignin | -0.105 | -0.021 | 0.600 | -0.104 | 0.192 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 3.556 | 2.187 | 1.520 | 1.346 | 1.250 |
方差贡献率/% Rate of variance | 25.399 | 15.624 | 10.854 | 9.616 | 8.931 |
累计贡献率/% Rate of cumulative variances | 25.399 | 41.023 | 51.877 | 61.493 | 70.424 |
种质编号 Germplasm No. | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | 综合得分 Synthesis scores | 排序 Sorting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ND-083 | 3.738 | -0.242 | -0.415 | 3.093 | -0.490 | 1.591 | 1 |
ND-163 | 1.995 | 1.726 | -0.780 | 0.110 | 1.144 | 1.142 | 2 |
ND-257 | 1.548 | 1.857 | 1.000 | -0.769 | 0.152 | 1.039 | 3 |
ND-097 | 1.501 | 1.669 | 0.741 | -0.063 | -0.137 | 1.000 | 4 |
ND-166 | 1.898 | 0.024 | 1.337 | 0.418 | -0.034 | 0.949 | 5 |
ND-345 | 0.243 | 2.966 | 0.528 | -0.773 | 1.789 | 0.948 | 6 |
ND-092 | 1.561 | 2.076 | 0.229 | -1.116 | 0.089 | 0.918 | 7 |
ND-039 | 1.973 | 1.028 | -0.246 | 0.988 | -1.018 | 0.908 | 8 |
ND-091 | 1.216 | 0.804 | 2.356 | 0.085 | -0.980 | 0.868 | 9 |
ND-225 | 0.885 | 2.046 | 0.877 | -0.345 | -0.073 | 0.852 | 10 |
ND-168 | 0.681 | 2.731 | -0.131 | -0.503 | 0.661 | 0.847 | 11 |
ND-192 | 2.483 | -0.057 | -0.577 | -0.197 | 0.390 | 0.816 | 12 |
ND-284 | 1.470 | 1.303 | -0.214 | -0.472 | 0.490 | 0.784 | 13 |
ND-160 | 1.298 | 0.756 | 0.029 | -0.035 | 0.985 | 0.760 | 14 |
ND-110 | 1.791 | -0.290 | 1.112 | -0.193 | 0.115 | 0.741 | 15 |
ND-170 | 1.388 | -0.397 | 1.276 | 0.623 | 0.355 | 0.739 | 16 |
ND-256 | 1.389 | 0.922 | 0.596 | 0.249 | -0.931 | 0.713 | 17 |
ND-172 | 1.690 | 0.391 | 0.497 | -0.652 | 0.034 | 0.688 | 18 |
ND-407 | 0.486 | 0.186 | 1.692 | 0.610 | 0.961 | 0.683 | 19 |
ND-106 | 1.210 | 0.097 | 0.848 | -0.350 | 0.798 | 0.642 | 20 |
ND-155 | 1.552 | -0.263 | 0.034 | 0.447 | 0.542 | 0.636 | 21 |
ND-059 | 1.996 | 0.368 | 0.142 | -0.496 | -0.987 | 0.631 | 22 |
ND-048 | 2.488 | 0.067 | -0.287 | -0.167 | -1.746 | 0.624 | 23 |
ND-096 | 0.892 | 0.943 | 1.146 | -0.170 | -0.489 | 0.622 | 24 |
ND-171 | 0.960 | -0.012 | 1.542 | -0.239 | 0.543 | 0.617 | 25 |
ND-087 | 2.215 | 0.291 | -0.474 | -0.056 | -1.572 | 0.584 | 26 |
宁海白 Ninghaibai | 2.225 | 1.720 | -3.781 | -2.247 | 2.148 | 0.567 | 27 |
大房 Oobusa | -3.059 | 1.062 | -1.153 | -0.188 | -1.648 | -1.280 | 96 |
Table 7 Prediction and evaluation results of F1 generation fruit quality of loquat‘Ninghaibai’and‘Oobusa’(Top 26)
种质编号 Germplasm No. | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | 综合得分 Synthesis scores | 排序 Sorting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ND-083 | 3.738 | -0.242 | -0.415 | 3.093 | -0.490 | 1.591 | 1 |
ND-163 | 1.995 | 1.726 | -0.780 | 0.110 | 1.144 | 1.142 | 2 |
ND-257 | 1.548 | 1.857 | 1.000 | -0.769 | 0.152 | 1.039 | 3 |
ND-097 | 1.501 | 1.669 | 0.741 | -0.063 | -0.137 | 1.000 | 4 |
ND-166 | 1.898 | 0.024 | 1.337 | 0.418 | -0.034 | 0.949 | 5 |
ND-345 | 0.243 | 2.966 | 0.528 | -0.773 | 1.789 | 0.948 | 6 |
ND-092 | 1.561 | 2.076 | 0.229 | -1.116 | 0.089 | 0.918 | 7 |
ND-039 | 1.973 | 1.028 | -0.246 | 0.988 | -1.018 | 0.908 | 8 |
ND-091 | 1.216 | 0.804 | 2.356 | 0.085 | -0.980 | 0.868 | 9 |
ND-225 | 0.885 | 2.046 | 0.877 | -0.345 | -0.073 | 0.852 | 10 |
ND-168 | 0.681 | 2.731 | -0.131 | -0.503 | 0.661 | 0.847 | 11 |
ND-192 | 2.483 | -0.057 | -0.577 | -0.197 | 0.390 | 0.816 | 12 |
ND-284 | 1.470 | 1.303 | -0.214 | -0.472 | 0.490 | 0.784 | 13 |
ND-160 | 1.298 | 0.756 | 0.029 | -0.035 | 0.985 | 0.760 | 14 |
ND-110 | 1.791 | -0.290 | 1.112 | -0.193 | 0.115 | 0.741 | 15 |
ND-170 | 1.388 | -0.397 | 1.276 | 0.623 | 0.355 | 0.739 | 16 |
ND-256 | 1.389 | 0.922 | 0.596 | 0.249 | -0.931 | 0.713 | 17 |
ND-172 | 1.690 | 0.391 | 0.497 | -0.652 | 0.034 | 0.688 | 18 |
ND-407 | 0.486 | 0.186 | 1.692 | 0.610 | 0.961 | 0.683 | 19 |
ND-106 | 1.210 | 0.097 | 0.848 | -0.350 | 0.798 | 0.642 | 20 |
ND-155 | 1.552 | -0.263 | 0.034 | 0.447 | 0.542 | 0.636 | 21 |
ND-059 | 1.996 | 0.368 | 0.142 | -0.496 | -0.987 | 0.631 | 22 |
ND-048 | 2.488 | 0.067 | -0.287 | -0.167 | -1.746 | 0.624 | 23 |
ND-096 | 0.892 | 0.943 | 1.146 | -0.170 | -0.489 | 0.622 | 24 |
ND-171 | 0.960 | -0.012 | 1.542 | -0.239 | 0.543 | 0.617 | 25 |
ND-087 | 2.215 | 0.291 | -0.474 | -0.056 | -1.572 | 0.584 | 26 |
宁海白 Ninghaibai | 2.225 | 1.720 | -3.781 | -2.247 | 2.148 | 0.567 | 27 |
大房 Oobusa | -3.059 | 1.062 | -1.153 | -0.188 | -1.648 | -1.280 | 96 |
[1] |
|
陈克玲, 陈力耕, 刘建军, 洪棋斌, 李洪雯. 2006. 柑桔果实主要性状的遗传倾向研究. 西南农业学报, 19 (6):1114-1120.
|
|
[2] |
|
陈秀萍, 黄爱萍, 蒋际谋, 郑少泉, 邓朝军, 魏秀清, 胡文舜, 姜帆. 2011. 枇杷种质资源数量分类研究. 园艺学报, 38 (4):644-656.
|
|
[3] |
|
崔艳波, 陈慧, 乐文全, 张树军, 伍涛, 陶书田, 张绍铃. 2011. ‘京白梨’与‘鸭梨’正反交后代果实性状遗传倾向研究. 园艺学报, 38 (2):215-224.
|
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
冯传余. 2003. 日本‘大房’等枇杷品种引种初报. 浙江柑桔,(4):32-33.
|
|
[6] |
|
冯健君, 王学德, 刘权, 张伟, 叶建国. 2004. 优质枇杷新品种‘宁海白’. 园艺学报, 31 (2):279.
|
|
[7] |
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru257 pmid: 24935622 |
[8] |
|
韩飞, 赵婷婷, 刘小莉, 张琦, 李大卫, 田华, 彭珏, 钟彩虹. 2022. 山梨猕猴桃与中华猕猴桃种间杂交后代果实性状的遗传倾向分析. 植物科学学报, 40 (4):505-512.
|
|
[9] |
pmid: 15333646 |
[10] |
|
黄志明, 林素英, 傅明连, 陈宇, 蔡丽琴, 吴衍旺, 吴凌瑶, 吴锦程. 2012. 枇杷果实发育过程中果肉质地与胞壁酶活性的变化. 热带作物学报, 33 (1):24-29.
|
|
[11] |
|
蒋际谋, 姜帆, 陈秀萍, 胡文舜, 邓朝军, 郑少泉. 2013. 枇杷主要品质评价指标研究. 园艺学报, 40 (12):2382-2390.
|
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
雷蕾, 徐国辉, 王丽, 杜乾慧, 李逸斐, 王贺新. 2022. 蓝莓森茂一号与绿宝石正反交后代果实主要经济性状遗传倾向分析. 果树学报, 39 (9):1573-1586.
|
|
[14] |
|
李彦彪, 马维峰, 贾进, 牟德生, 李生保, 毛娟. 2021. 河西走廊不同产地‘赤霞珠’酿酒葡萄果实品质评价. 西北植物学报, 41 (5):817-827.
|
|
[15] |
|
刘家成, 章秋平, 牛铁泉, 刘宁, 张玉萍, 徐铭, 马小雪, 张玉君, 刘硕, 刘威生. 2020. ‘串枝红’与‘赛买提’杏正、反交后代果实性状遗传倾向分析. 果树学报, 37 (5):625-634.
|
|
[16] |
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.02.011 |
刘针杉, 涂红霞, 周荆婷, 马艳, 柴久凤, 王旨意, 杨鹏飞, 杨小芹,
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.02.011 |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0696-2 pmid: 18273642 |
[19] |
|
沈颖, 李芳东, 王玉霞, 张序, 李延菊, 赵慧, 张福兴. 2020. 甜樱桃果实发育过程中细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的变化. 果树学报, 37 (5):677-686.
|
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
宋海岩, 刘俊宏, 江国良, 涂美艳, 孙淑霞, 李靖, 王玲利, 徐子鸿, 银登贵, 陈栋, 龚荣高. 2022. 10个桃杂交组合F1代主要果实性状遗传倾向分析与优势亲本筛选. 四川农业大学学报, 40 (6):812-819,877.
|
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
谭伟, 李晓梅, 董志刚, 谭敏, 杨兆亮, 唐晓萍. 2018. 毛欧杂种‘2-1-3’杂交F1代果实性状遗传倾向分析. 果树学报, 35 (12):1444-1454.
|
|
[24] |
|
王燕, 刘针杉, 张静, 杨鹏飞, 马蓝, 王旨意, 涂红霞, 杨绍凤, 王浩, 陈涛, 王小蓉. 2022. 中国樱桃杂交F1代花和果实若干性状遗传倾向分析. 园艺学报, 49 (9):1853-1865.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0653 |
|
[25] |
|
王勇, 伍国红, 李玉玲, 孙锋, 骆强伟,苏来曼·艾则孜,郭平峰,余义和. 2015. ‘红地球’葡萄杂交F1代重要果实性状遗传倾向分析. 果树学报, 32 (6):1099-1106.
|
|
[26] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0148 |
武红霞, 李星, 许文天, 郑斌, 马小卫, 苏穆清, 梁清志, 姚全胜, 王松标. 2022. 杧果‘金煌’ב热农1号’后代果实性状遗传分析. 园艺学报, 49 (2):416-426.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0148 |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0470 |
杨植, 张川疆, 杨芯芳, 董梦怡, 王振磊, 闫芬芬, 吴翠云, 王玖瑞, 刘孟军, 林敏娟. 2023. 枣与酸枣杂交后代果实遗传倾向及混合遗传分析. 园艺学报, 50 (1):36-52.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0470 |
|
[29] |
|
喻华平, 赵志常, 高爱平, 罗睿雄. 2022. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的23份黄皮种质资源的品质评价. 热带作物学报, 43 (7):1357-1364.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2022.07.006 |
|
[30] |
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.11.018 |
于馨淼, 陈发兴, 卢海芬, 邱秀玉, 郑国华, 杨俊. 2019. 不同品种枇杷果实微量元素分析及综合评价. 热带作物学报, 40 (11):2227-2235.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.11.018 |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
张玲, 郑婷婷, 魏伟淋, 朱云美, 高用顺, 杨向晖, 林顺权. 2015. 两种不同肉色枇杷果实类胡萝卜素积累及合成相关基因的表达. 园艺学报, 42 (11):2153-2162.
|
|
[33] |
|
赵崇斌, 郭乙含, 李舒庆, 徐红霞, 黄天启, 林顺权, 陈俊伟, 杨向晖. 2021. 宁海白 × 大房枇杷F1杂交群体果实性状的相关性及遗传分析. 果树学报, 38 (7):1055-1065.
|
|
[34] |
|
赵亚楠, 欧春青, 王斐, 张艳杰, 马力, 姜淑苓. 2018. 梨F1代群体果实性状的遗传分析及相关性研究. 西北农业学报, 27 (12):1811-1818.
|
[1] | ZHAO Chongbin, ZHANG Weiyin, LI Shuqing, GUO Yihan, XU Hongxia, CHEN Junwei, YANG Xianghui, PENG Ze. Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping and Analysis of Traits Related to Flower,Fruit,and Leaf in Loquat [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1189-1200. |
[2] | GE Hang, LI Xiaoying, WANG Zhixuan, ZHU Qixuan, CHEN Junwei, XU Hongxia. Evaluation of Freezing Tolerance in Loquat Young Fruit Based on the Survival Percentage of Fruit Clusters After Cold Spell [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(12): 2895-2912. |
[3] | WANG Xiaolong, SHAO Xuedong, ZHANG Zhengwen, ZHONG Xiaomin, LIU Chang, WANG Zhiqiang, WANG Baoliang, JI Xiaohao, SHI Xiangbin, WANG Haibo. Correlation Analysis of Fruit Quality and the Nutrient Level in Plant and Soil of Wine Grape‘Merlot’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2575-2593. |
[4] | WU Yajie, JIAO Yu, WANG Hailong, CHEN Zhixing, PU Hao, ZHU Zihan, ZOU Qian, TANG Shukun, CAO Yanru. Screening Research and Comprehensive Evaluation of Rooting Agents for Chrysanthemum Cuttings [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2657-2667. |
[5] | ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Yunchun, DANG Jiangbo, LIN Shoukai, WU Di, JING Danlong, GUO Qigao, LIANG Guolu, XIANG Suqiong. A Review of Inflorescence Development and Formation Mechanism of Loquat [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(9): 1929-1943. |
[6] | ZHANG Xi, ZHAO Qiuyan, GU Zhijia, HUANG Haiquan, YAN Bo, HUANG Meijuan. Studies on Pollen Micromorphology of Impatiens Plants in Southwest Sichuan [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(8): 1664-1678. |
[7] | WANG Hongxiu, ZHOU Shangling, HE Shaoguo, TIAN Zaize, MA Jinghua, PENG Liangzhi, CHUN Changpin. Study on the Standard of Nutrient Elements Contents in Eureka Lemon Leaves [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1535-1546. |
[8] | YANG Mengxia, LIU Xiaolin, CAO Xue, WEI Kai, NING Yu, YANG Pei, LI Shanshan, CHEN Ziyue, WANG Xiaoxuan, GUO Yanmei, DU Yongchen, LI Junming, LIU Lei, LI Xin, HUANG Zejun. Construction and Application of a CRISPR/Cas9 System for Multiplex Gene Editing in Tomato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1215-1229. |
[9] | DUAN Kaihang, WANG Xiaoling, MAO Yongmin, WANG Yao, REN Yongxiang, REN Liuliu, SHEN Lianying. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Wild Jujube Germplasm Resources Based on Quantitative Characters [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(12): 2568-2576. |
[10] | ZHANG Zhanwei, RUAN Xiancong, LIN Shunquan, CHEN Jian, FENG Ruixiang, YANG Xianghui, and XU Shejin. A New Early Maturing White-flesh Loquat Cultivar‘Zaojia 8’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 45-46. |
[11] | SONG Haiyan, SUN Shuxia, LI Jing, CHEN Dong, TU Meiyan, WANG Lingli, XU Zihong, YIN Denggui, and JIANG Guoliang. A New Mid-maturing Loquat Cultivar‘Xishu 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 47-48. |
[12] | YANG Xianghui, ZHANG Zhanwei, CHEN Jian, FENG Ruixiang, RUAN Xiancong, XU Shejin, ZHAO Chongbin, LI Shuqing, CHEN Jun, and LIN Shunquan, . A New White-flesh Loquat Cultivar‘Yuehui’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 49-50. |
[13] | PAN Haifa, LU Weiming, GAO Xia, SHENG Yu, ZHOU Hui, XIE Qingmei, SHI Pei, WANG Jiabin, SUN Xiaoyao, and ZHANG Jinyun, . A New Late Maturing Loquat Cultivar‘Huihong 2’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 51-52. |
[14] | PAN Haifa, LU Weiming, SHENG Yu, ZHOU Hui, XIE Qingmei, CHEN Hongli, WANG Jiabin, ZHANG Xiuying, SHI Pei, and ZHANG Jinyun, . A New Early Maturing Loquat Cultivar‘Dayemen’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 53-54. |
[15] | WU Hongxia, LI Xing, XU Wentian, ZHENG Bin, MA Xiaowei, SU Muqing, LIANG Qingzhi, YAO Quansheng, WANG Songbiao. Genetic Analysis of Fruit Traits in F1 Progenies of ‘Chinhuang’בRenong 1’Mango [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(2): 416-426. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd