Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9): 2545-2559.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0836
• Genetic & Breeding · Germplasm Resources · Molecular Biology • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Weifeng, WANG Fei, ZHANG Yanjie, QI Liyong, MA Li, LI Lixue, LUO Siming, YANG Zhen, JIANG Shuling*(
), OU Chunqing*(
)
Received:2025-11-07
Revised:2026-05-09
Online:2026-09-25
Published:2026-09-20
Contact:
JIANG Shuling, OU Chunqing
CLC Number:
ZHANG Weifeng, WANG Fei, ZHANG Yanjie, QI Liyong, MA Li, LI Lixue, LUO Siming, YANG Zhen, JIANG Shuling, OU Chunqing. Screening of Pear Genotypes with High-Efficiency Leaf Regeneration and Optimization of Leaf Regeneration System for‘Zaojinxiang’Pear[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(9): 2545-2559.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0836
| 株系代号 Line code | 亲本来源 Parental sources |
|---|---|
| S03-54、S03-62、S03-64、S03-75、S03-62、S03-105、S03-110、S03-115、S03-119、S03-124、S03-126、S03-128、S03-129、S05-101、S05-103、S05-110、S05-111和S05-114 | 锦丰 × 新水 Jinfeng × Shinsui |
| S06-94、S06-95、S06-96、S07-27、S07-44、S07-53、S07-54、S07-91、S07-71 | 火把 × 黄金 Huoba × Whangkeumbae |
| S08-9、S08-33、S08-43、S08-54、S08-56、S08-63、S08-72、S08-80、S09-40、S09-48、S09-46、S09-76、S09-82和S09-94 | 云南红梨 × 金花 Yunnanhongli × Jinhua |
| S10-16、S10-23、S10-24和S10-29 | 华酥 × 南果 Huasu × Nanguo |
| B1-9 | 红茄 × 黄冠 Red Clapp Favorite × Huangguan |
| 11-7-3 | 中矮4号 × 南果 Zhongai 4 × Nanguo |
| 08-7-120、08-7-128 | 中矮1号 × 日面红 Zhongai 1 × Flemish Beauty |
| 08-6-112 | 锦丰 × 中梨一号 Jinfeng × Zhongli 1 |
Table 1 Parental sources of partial lines used in this study
| 株系代号 Line code | 亲本来源 Parental sources |
|---|---|
| S03-54、S03-62、S03-64、S03-75、S03-62、S03-105、S03-110、S03-115、S03-119、S03-124、S03-126、S03-128、S03-129、S05-101、S05-103、S05-110、S05-111和S05-114 | 锦丰 × 新水 Jinfeng × Shinsui |
| S06-94、S06-95、S06-96、S07-27、S07-44、S07-53、S07-54、S07-91、S07-71 | 火把 × 黄金 Huoba × Whangkeumbae |
| S08-9、S08-33、S08-43、S08-54、S08-56、S08-63、S08-72、S08-80、S09-40、S09-48、S09-46、S09-76、S09-82和S09-94 | 云南红梨 × 金花 Yunnanhongli × Jinhua |
| S10-16、S10-23、S10-24和S10-29 | 华酥 × 南果 Huasu × Nanguo |
| B1-9 | 红茄 × 黄冠 Red Clapp Favorite × Huangguan |
| 11-7-3 | 中矮4号 × 南果 Zhongai 4 × Nanguo |
| 08-7-120、08-7-128 | 中矮1号 × 日面红 Zhongai 1 × Flemish Beauty |
| 08-6-112 | 锦丰 × 中梨一号 Jinfeng × Zhongli 1 |
| NaClO/% | 处理时间/min Treatment time | 无菌存活率/% Axenic survival rate | 致死率/% Lethal rate | 污染率/% Contamination rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 3 | 31.21 ± 4.66 df | 6.06 ± 5.25 d | 62.73 ± 7.77 a |
| 5 | 43.63 ± 3.15 cd | 15.76 ± 5.85 cd | 40.60 ± 4.58 bc | |
| 8 | 6.67 ± 5.77 f | 51.21 ± 11.87 ab | 42.12 ± 7.06 b | |
| 1.0 | 5 | 52.07 ± 9.41 bd | 11.36 ± 12.65 cd | 36.56 ± 3.34 bc |
| 7 | 13.77 ± 7.33 ef | 62.39 ± 15.60 a | 23.84 ± 8.27 cf | |
| 8 | 17.10 ± 7.03 ef | 66.10 ± 9.23 a | 16.80 ± 6.23 df | |
| 1.5 | 4 | 63.69 ± 7.88 abc | 8.59 ± 8.35 d | 27.73 ± 11.16 bf |
| 5 | 57.88 ± 7.06 abc | 8.59 ± 8.35 d | 33.53 ± 6.37 bcd | |
| 6 | 59.93 ± 12.35 abc | 10.72 ± 11.63 cd | 29.35 ± 1.84 bf | |
| 8 | 18.59 ± 10.59 ef | 53.99 ± 12.4 ab | 27.42 ± 2.50 bf | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 43.60 ± 6.86 cd | 29.90 ± 8.70 bd | 26.50 ± 3.95 bf |
| 4 | 73.74 ± 7.63 ab | 2.78 ± 4.81 d | 23.48 ± 4.73 cf | |
| 5 | 28.52 ± 5.70 df | 39.26 ± 5.59 abc | 32.22 ± 1.92 bcde | |
| 6 | 60.04 ± 8.64 abc | 9.76 ± 9.17 cd | 30.20 ± 3.04 bcde | |
| 7 | 78.89 ± 11.70 a | 5.56 ± 9.62 d | 15.56 ± 5.09 ef | |
| 8 | 32.99 ± 9.91 de | 54.21 ± 9.61 ab | 12.79 ± 4.77 f |
Table 2 Disinfection effects of different NaClO concentrations and disinfection times on the field-collected pear leaf explants
| NaClO/% | 处理时间/min Treatment time | 无菌存活率/% Axenic survival rate | 致死率/% Lethal rate | 污染率/% Contamination rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 3 | 31.21 ± 4.66 df | 6.06 ± 5.25 d | 62.73 ± 7.77 a |
| 5 | 43.63 ± 3.15 cd | 15.76 ± 5.85 cd | 40.60 ± 4.58 bc | |
| 8 | 6.67 ± 5.77 f | 51.21 ± 11.87 ab | 42.12 ± 7.06 b | |
| 1.0 | 5 | 52.07 ± 9.41 bd | 11.36 ± 12.65 cd | 36.56 ± 3.34 bc |
| 7 | 13.77 ± 7.33 ef | 62.39 ± 15.60 a | 23.84 ± 8.27 cf | |
| 8 | 17.10 ± 7.03 ef | 66.10 ± 9.23 a | 16.80 ± 6.23 df | |
| 1.5 | 4 | 63.69 ± 7.88 abc | 8.59 ± 8.35 d | 27.73 ± 11.16 bf |
| 5 | 57.88 ± 7.06 abc | 8.59 ± 8.35 d | 33.53 ± 6.37 bcd | |
| 6 | 59.93 ± 12.35 abc | 10.72 ± 11.63 cd | 29.35 ± 1.84 bf | |
| 8 | 18.59 ± 10.59 ef | 53.99 ± 12.4 ab | 27.42 ± 2.50 bf | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 43.60 ± 6.86 cd | 29.90 ± 8.70 bd | 26.50 ± 3.95 bf |
| 4 | 73.74 ± 7.63 ab | 2.78 ± 4.81 d | 23.48 ± 4.73 cf | |
| 5 | 28.52 ± 5.70 df | 39.26 ± 5.59 abc | 32.22 ± 1.92 bcde | |
| 6 | 60.04 ± 8.64 abc | 9.76 ± 9.17 cd | 30.20 ± 3.04 bcde | |
| 7 | 78.89 ± 11.70 a | 5.56 ± 9.62 d | 15.56 ± 5.09 ef | |
| 8 | 32.99 ± 9.91 de | 54.21 ± 9.61 ab | 12.79 ± 4.77 f |
| 品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 处理时间/min Treatment time | 无菌存活率/% Axenic survival rate | 污染率/% Contamination rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 早金香 Zaojinxiang | 2 | 6 | 81.67 ± 11.69 b | 18.33 ± 11.69 a |
| 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 3 | 6 | 93.33 ± 8.17 ab | 6.67 ± 8.17 ab | |
| 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 八月红 | 2 | 6 | 86.67 ± 15.06 ab | 13.33 ± 15.06 ab |
| Bayuehong | 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | |
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 3 | 6 | 88.33 ± 13.29 ab | 11.67 ± 13.29 ab | |
| 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b |
Table 3 Disinfection effects of different NaClO treatments on the hydroponic leaves of‘Zaojinxiang’and‘Bayuehong’pear
| 品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 处理时间/min Treatment time | 无菌存活率/% Axenic survival rate | 污染率/% Contamination rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 早金香 Zaojinxiang | 2 | 6 | 81.67 ± 11.69 b | 18.33 ± 11.69 a |
| 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 3 | 6 | 93.33 ± 8.17 ab | 6.67 ± 8.17 ab | |
| 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 八月红 | 2 | 6 | 86.67 ± 15.06 ab | 13.33 ± 15.06 ab |
| Bayuehong | 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | |
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 3 | 6 | 88.33 ± 13.29 ab | 11.67 ± 13.29 ab | |
| 7 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b | ||
| 8 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 0 b |
| 品种或品系名称 Cultivar/Line name | 存活外植体数/个 Number of surviving explants | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1-9 | 3 | 100.00 | 1.67 |
| 早金香 Zaojinxiang | 18 | 72.22 | 1.92 |
| 早金香 Zaojinxiang* | 60 | 66.67 | 2.64 |
| 脆香 Cuixiang | 7 | 71.43 | 2.20 |
| 山梨1 Pyrus ussuriensis 1 | 3 | 66.67 | 1.00 |
| 晚香 Wanxiang | 18 | 55.56 | 1.30 |
| SODAK | 19 | 53.33 | 1.83 |
| 甘谷黑梨 Ganguheili | 4 | 50.00 | 2.00 |
| 冬蜜 Dongmi | 19 | 42.11 | 1.00 |
| 八月红 Bayuehong* | 60 | 41.70 | 1.49 |
| 甘长把 Ganchangba | 18 | 33.33 | 1.00 |
| 洋梨2 Pyrus communis 2 | 3 | 33.33 | 1.00 |
| 金香水 Jinxiangshui | 18 | 27.78 | 1.60 |
| 康弗伦斯 Conference | 37 | 17.69 | 1.00 |
| 苹博香 Pingboxiang | 9 | 11.11 | 1.00 |
| 2002-01-113 | 10 | 10.00 | 1.00 |
Table 4 Leaf regeneration performance of different pear cultivars or lines
| 品种或品系名称 Cultivar/Line name | 存活外植体数/个 Number of surviving explants | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1-9 | 3 | 100.00 | 1.67 |
| 早金香 Zaojinxiang | 18 | 72.22 | 1.92 |
| 早金香 Zaojinxiang* | 60 | 66.67 | 2.64 |
| 脆香 Cuixiang | 7 | 71.43 | 2.20 |
| 山梨1 Pyrus ussuriensis 1 | 3 | 66.67 | 1.00 |
| 晚香 Wanxiang | 18 | 55.56 | 1.30 |
| SODAK | 19 | 53.33 | 1.83 |
| 甘谷黑梨 Ganguheili | 4 | 50.00 | 2.00 |
| 冬蜜 Dongmi | 19 | 42.11 | 1.00 |
| 八月红 Bayuehong* | 60 | 41.70 | 1.49 |
| 甘长把 Ganchangba | 18 | 33.33 | 1.00 |
| 洋梨2 Pyrus communis 2 | 3 | 33.33 | 1.00 |
| 金香水 Jinxiangshui | 18 | 27.78 | 1.60 |
| 康弗伦斯 Conference | 37 | 17.69 | 1.00 |
| 苹博香 Pingboxiang | 9 | 11.11 | 1.00 |
| 2002-01-113 | 10 | 10.00 | 1.00 |
| 基本培养基 Basal medium | 存活外植体数 Number of surviving explants | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS | 35 | 85.98 ± 3.54 a | 2.51 ± 0.35 ab |
| NN69 | 33 | 90.86 ± 0.84 a | 2.64 ± 0.12 a |
| WPM | 30 | 7.04 ± 6.12 b | 1.00 ± 1.00 bc |
| 1/2MS | 30 | 13.33 ± 5.77 b | 1.17 ± 0.29 c |
Table 5 Effects of different basal media on leaf regeneration of‘Zaojinxiang’pear
| 基本培养基 Basal medium | 存活外植体数 Number of surviving explants | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS | 35 | 85.98 ± 3.54 a | 2.51 ± 0.35 ab |
| NN69 | 33 | 90.86 ± 0.84 a | 2.64 ± 0.12 a |
| WPM | 30 | 7.04 ± 6.12 b | 1.00 ± 1.00 bc |
| 1/2MS | 30 | 13.33 ± 5.77 b | 1.17 ± 0.29 c |
| TDZ/(mg · L-1) | IAA/(mg · L-1) | IBA/(mg · L-1) | NAA/(mg · L-1) | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 1.0 | 81.49 ± 16.96 ab | 2.41 ± 0.94 a | ||
| 2.0 | 0.3 | 62.93 ± 23.37 ab | 1.71 ± 0.54 a | ||
| 2.0 | 0.5 | 93.33 ± 5.77 a | 2.50 ± 0.28 a | ||
| 3.0 | 1.0 | 85.17 ± 9.49 ab | 2.33 ± 0.35 a | ||
| 3.0 | 0.3 | 53.02 ± 9.44 b | 1.80 ± 0.35 a | ||
| 3.0 | 0.5 | 68.85 ± 6.8 ab | 1.55 ± 0.17 a |
Table 6 Effects of different growth regulator combinations on leaf regeneration of‘Zaojinxiang’pear
| TDZ/(mg · L-1) | IAA/(mg · L-1) | IBA/(mg · L-1) | NAA/(mg · L-1) | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 1.0 | 81.49 ± 16.96 ab | 2.41 ± 0.94 a | ||
| 2.0 | 0.3 | 62.93 ± 23.37 ab | 1.71 ± 0.54 a | ||
| 2.0 | 0.5 | 93.33 ± 5.77 a | 2.50 ± 0.28 a | ||
| 3.0 | 1.0 | 85.17 ± 9.49 ab | 2.33 ± 0.35 a | ||
| 3.0 | 0.3 | 53.02 ± 9.44 b | 1.80 ± 0.35 a | ||
| 3.0 | 0.5 | 68.85 ± 6.8 ab | 1.55 ± 0.17 a |
| 暗培养时间/d Dark culture time | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 50.00 ± 10.00 b | 1.90 ± 0.66 a |
| 14 | 93.30 ± 5.77 a | 2.50 ± 0.28 a |
| 21 | 76.67 ± 23.00 a | 2.33 ± 0.29 a |
Table 7 Effects of different dark culture times on leaf regeneration of‘Zaojinxiang’pear
| 暗培养时间/d Dark culture time | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 50.00 ± 10.00 b | 1.90 ± 0.66 a |
| 14 | 93.30 ± 5.77 a | 2.50 ± 0.28 a |
| 21 | 76.67 ± 23.00 a | 2.33 ± 0.29 a |
| 叶片来源 Leaf source | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|
| 2008年开始的组培苗Tissue cultured seedlings starting from 2008 | 69.76 ± 5.36 c | 1.61 ± 0.35 b |
| 2023年开始的组培苗Tissue cultured seedlings starting from 2023 | 79.24 ± 9.38 bc | 2.39 ± 0.17 ab |
| 2024年开始的组培苗Tissue cultured seedlings starting from 2024 | 87.22 ± 6.31 ac | 2.52 ± 0.46 a |
| 田间大树Big trees in the fields | 96.97 ± 5.25 a | 2.37 ± 0.15 ab |
| 水培枝条Hydroponic shoots | 93.64 ± 5.53 ab | 2.51 ± 0.29 a |
Table 8 Comparison of leaf regeneration of different sourced‘Zaojinxiang’pears
| 叶片来源 Leaf source | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|
| 2008年开始的组培苗Tissue cultured seedlings starting from 2008 | 69.76 ± 5.36 c | 1.61 ± 0.35 b |
| 2023年开始的组培苗Tissue cultured seedlings starting from 2023 | 79.24 ± 9.38 bc | 2.39 ± 0.17 ab |
| 2024年开始的组培苗Tissue cultured seedlings starting from 2024 | 87.22 ± 6.31 ac | 2.52 ± 0.46 a |
| 田间大树Big trees in the fields | 96.97 ± 5.25 a | 2.37 ± 0.15 ab |
| 水培枝条Hydroponic shoots | 93.64 ± 5.53 ab | 2.51 ± 0.29 a |
| Kan/(mg · L-1) | 愈伤生长率/% Callus growth rate | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 93.64 ± 5.53 a | 2.51 ± 0.29 a |
| 5 | 96.67 ± 5.77 a | 66.67 ± 5.77 ab | 3.16 ± 0.17 a |
| 10 | 83.33 ± 5.77 a | 50.00 ± 10.00 bc | 2.46 ± 0.47 a |
| 15 | 54.04 ± 11.17 b | 32.63 ± 22.28 c | 1.22 ± 0.19 b |
| 20 | 33.53 ± 6.37 c | 0 d | 0 c |
Table 9 Effects of different Kanamycin concentrations on leaf regeneration of‘Zaojinxiang’pear
| Kan/(mg · L-1) | 愈伤生长率/% Callus growth rate | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | 93.64 ± 5.53 a | 2.51 ± 0.29 a |
| 5 | 96.67 ± 5.77 a | 66.67 ± 5.77 ab | 3.16 ± 0.17 a |
| 10 | 83.33 ± 5.77 a | 50.00 ± 10.00 bc | 2.46 ± 0.47 a |
| 15 | 54.04 ± 11.17 b | 32.63 ± 22.28 c | 1.22 ± 0.19 b |
| 20 | 33.53 ± 6.37 c | 0 d | 0 c |
| Cef /(mg · L-1) | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 93.64 ± 5.53 a | 2.51 ± 0.29 a |
| 250 | 90.61 ± 9.11 a | 2.89 ± 0.45 a |
| 300 | 91.41 ± 8.35 a | 2.71 ± 0.18 a |
| 350 | 45.41 ± 7.96 b | 1.30 ± 0.26 b |
| 400 | 18.48 ± 8.64 c | 1.00 ± 0.00 b |
Table 10 Effects of different Cephalosporin concentrations on leaf regeneration of‘Zaojinxiang’pear
| Cef /(mg · L-1) | 再生率/% Regeneration rate | 平均再生芽数 Average number of regenerated buds |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 93.64 ± 5.53 a | 2.51 ± 0.29 a |
| 250 | 90.61 ± 9.11 a | 2.89 ± 0.45 a |
| 300 | 91.41 ± 8.35 a | 2.71 ± 0.18 a |
| 350 | 45.41 ± 7.96 b | 1.30 ± 0.26 b |
| 400 | 18.48 ± 8.64 c | 1.00 ± 0.00 b |
| [1] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.007 URL |
| [2] |
doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-0034-4 URL |
| [3] |
doi: 10.1080/14620316.1987.11515786 URL |
| [4] |
doi: 10.1023/A:1016304106529 |
| [5] |
|
|
陈曦. 2021. ‘玉露香’梨叶片再生体系的建立及遗传转化研究[硕士论文]. 保定: 河北农业大学.
|
|
| [6] |
doi: 10.3390/horticulturae11010077 URL |
| [7] |
|
|
杜宜南, 许建锋, 张玉星, 亓宝秀. 2018. 梨离体再生及遗传转化研究进展. 果树学报, 35 (增刊):9-16.
|
|
| [8] |
|
|
冯鑫慧. 2020. 秋子梨遗传转化体系优化和微嫁接体系建立[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
|
|
| [9] |
|
|
甘惠芳. 2008. 农杆菌介导苹果PPO基因dsRNAi转化‘丰水’梨的研究[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
|
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
|
郭苏丽. 2023. 秋子梨和‘康弗伦斯’梨叶片再生及遗传转化体系的研究[硕士论文]. 泰安: 山东农业大学.
|
|
| [12] |
|
|
韩继成, 冯志红, 陈霜莹. 1998. 梨离体叶片诱导不定芽的研究. 河北果树, 10 (2):12.
|
|
| [13] |
doi: 10.1007/BF01983223 URL |
| [14] |
doi: 10.1007/BF00042180 |
| [15] |
|
|
李嫦艳. 2011. 早熟梨组织培养再生体系建立的研究[硕士论文]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学.
|
|
| [16] |
|
|
李桂琴, 张玉星, 高志华, 于伟娜, 牛艳玲. 2010. 鸭梨叶片不定芽再生体系的建立. 果树学报, 27 (3):436-440.
|
|
| [17] |
|
|
林静. 2015. 杜梨子叶再生及遗传转化体系的建立[硕士论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学.
|
|
| [18] |
|
|
刘春, 高同雨, 苏本营, 李锦锦, 李晶, 武雅娟, 王巍, 沈应柏. 2019. ‘京白梨’优良单株组织培养高效快繁体系构建. 广西林业科学, 48 (2):173-178.
|
|
| [19] |
|
|
刘玲梅, 汤浩茹, 刘娟. 2008. 试管苗长期继代培养中的形态发生能力与遗传稳定性. 生物技术通报,(5):22-27.
|
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
|
刘松瑜. 2009. 豆梨遗传转化体系的建立及转基因植株增殖生根研究[硕士论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学.
|
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
|
穆建鑫. 2021. ‘中梨一号’梨再生体系建立及秋子梨遗传转化体系探索[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
|
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
doi: 10.1007/BF00272764 pmid: 24240424 |
| [26] |
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16030218 |
|
冉昆, 王宏伟, 王少敏. 2017. 梨组织培养与遗传转化研究进展. 中国农学通报, 33 (4):74-79.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16030218 |
|
| [27] |
doi: 10.1007/s11816-023-00823-y |
| [28] |
|
|
孙洪雁, 陶吉寒, 辛力, 孙清荣. 2016. TDZ和BA对金花梨和鸭梨叶片不定芽再生的影响. 山东农业科学, 48 (1):26-28.
|
|
| [29] |
|
|
孙清荣. 2000. 金花梨叶片不定梢诱导研究. 落叶果树, 35 (3):8-10.
|
|
| [30] |
|
|
孙清荣, 刘庆忠, 赵红军, 刘鹏. 2004. 影响梨叶片高频不定梢再生因素的研究. 中国农学通报, 21 (4):99-100.
|
|
| [31] |
|
|
孙清荣, 关秋竹, 陶吉寒, 孙洪雁. 2020. 碳源和细胞分裂素对‘库尔勒香梨’离体叶片再生不定芽的影响. 山东农业科学, 52 (8):17-20.
|
|
| [32] |
|
|
谭雪辉, 刘洪章. 2007. 梨组织培养与遗传转化研究进展. 北方园艺, 31 (1):147-149.
|
|
| [33] |
|
|
陶爱群. 2008. 豆梨离体再生体系建立与rol B基因转化研究[博士论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学.
|
|
| [34] |
|
|
陶爱群, 谢深喜, 姜小文, 尹婷, 刘松愉. 2009. 豆梨子叶再生体系的建立. 经济林研究, 27 (4):52-56.
|
|
| [35] |
|
|
陶爱群, 尹婷, 谢深喜. 2012. 黄金梨叶片再生体系建立研究. 湖南农业科学, 42 (5):108-111.
|
|
| [36] |
|
|
涂俊凡, 秦仲麒, 李先明, 伍涛, 杨夫臣, 朱红艳, 刘政, 杨立. 2017. 鄂梨2号叶片高效再生体系的建立. 湖北农业科学, 56 (23):4613-4615.
|
|
| [37] |
|
|
王德芬, 张梅, 李鼎立, 王然, 马春晖, 宋健坤. 2016. 秋子梨叶片高效再生体系的构建. 北方园艺, 40 (4):97-101.
|
|
| [38] |
|
|
王海燕. 2014. 农杆菌介导rolB基因转化杜梨的研究[硕士论文]. 保定: 河北农业大学.
|
|
| [39] |
|
|
王月, 尹杰, 王然, 袁美同, 李鼎立. 2020. 梨矮化砧木‘青砧D3’叶片高效再生体系的构建. 北方园艺, 44 (9):17-22.
|
|
| [40] |
|
|
邢明佳. 2024. 根癌农杆菌介导的山梨和‘康弗伦斯’遗传转化体系优化[硕士论文]. 泰安: 山东农业大学.
|
|
| [41] |
|
|
徐凌飞, 马锋旺, 王喆之, 任小林, 曹晓雁. 2002. 梨叶片离体培养和植株再生. 园艺学报, 41 (4):367-368.
|
|
| [42] |
|
|
徐凌飞. 2005. 梨离体再生和遗传转化的研究[博士论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
|
|
| [43] |
doi: 10.1007/s44281-023-00017-0 |
| [44] |
|
|
闫允青, 姜桦韬, 谷超, 吴俊. 2017. ‘雪花梨’扩繁和叶片再生体系的建立. 南京农业大学学报, 40 (1):68-75.
|
|
| [45] |
|
|
杨冠宇, 王斐, 张艳杰, 马力, 李佳纯, 欧春青, 姜淑苓. 2022. 杜梨砧木组培扩繁技术研究. 中国果树, 64 (6):59-63.
|
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
|
杨阳, 王红丽, 高平. 2018. 低温胁迫对耧斗菜叶片形态和生理特性的影响. 江苏农业科学, 46 (23):151-153.
|
|
| [48] |
|
|
叶宇, 欧春青, 王斐, 张艳杰, 马力, 杨冠宇, 李佳纯, 姜淑苓. 2022. 梨组织培养研究进展及其在育种中的应用. 中国果树, 64 (5):1-7.
|
|
| [49] |
|
|
尹金凤. 1998. 适宜寒地栽培的新品种脆香梨. 作物品种资源, 17 (2):59.
|
|
| [50] |
|
|
尹婷. 2008. 砂梨离体再生体系的建立及转chit42基因的研究[硕士论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学.
|
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
|
张玉娇, 李晓刚, 蔺经, 王宏伟, 常有宏. 2010. 黄冠梨叶片再生体系的建立. 江苏农业科学, 38 (4):38-39.
|
|
| [53] |
|
|
钟颖, 冯建荣, 樊新民, 任欢喜, 张秀抗, 许竹叶. 2018. 库尔勒香梨离体叶片再生体系的建立. 新疆农业科学, 55 (5):829-836.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2018.05.006 |
|
| [54] |
|
|
周泳. 2005. 农杆菌介导的铁贮藏蛋白基因转化翠冠梨的研究[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
|
|
| [55] |
|
|
周莉莉, 蔡斌华, 乔玉山, 王三红, 章镇. 2007. 不同处理对丰水梨离体叶片不定芽再生的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 30 (2):34-38.
|
| [1] | TU Junfan, LI Xianming, ZHU Hongyan, ZHANG Li. A New High-Quality Pear Cultivar‘Minglu’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 19-20. |
| [2] | ZHANG Yanjie, OU Chunqing, WANG Fei, MA Li, QI Liyong, JIANG Shuling. A New High-Quality Pear Cultivar‘Huayun’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 21-22. |
| [3] | MA Na, LU Liqing, ZHANG Haiqi, LIU Chunyan, QI Yongjie, XU Yiliu, XIAO Ziwen, LI Minggang, ZHU Yingxu, GAO Zhenghui. A New Pear Cultivar‘Wanli 7’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 25-26. |
| [4] | WEI Chunyan, CAI Danying, WANG Yuezhi, SHI Zebin, ZHONG Linbing, DAI Meisong. A New Sand Pear Cultivar‘Zhongyu’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 27-28. |
| [5] | LI Lelong, WANG Ran, SONG Jiankun. A New Red Pear Cultivar‘Luyan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 29-30. |
| [6] | SU Yanli, GAO Xiaoming, WANG Long, WANG Suke, ZHANG Xiangzhan, WANG Yanan, XUE Huabai. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Texture in 488 Pear Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(8): 2213-2223. |
| [7] | LIU Xiaomin, XU Liangliang, LIU Yaling, WU Jun. Research Progress of Drought Stress Response in Pear [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(7): 1955-1976. |
| [8] | LIU Sitong, YAN Weiwei, SUN Xiaonan, ZHANG Xinnan, TIAN Luming, LI Yunpeng, JIA Xiaohui. Pathogen Identification,Fungicide Efficacy Assessment,and Germplasm Resistance Evaluation of Anthracnose in‘Docteur Jules Guyot’Pear [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(6): 1753-1764. |
| [9] | XU Huinan, GAO Mengjie, QI Kaijie, CUI Yanbo, WU Xiao, TAO Shutian, ZHANG Shaoling, YIN Hao. Phenotypic Diversity Evaluation of Shoots and Leaves in 264 Pear Germplasm Accessions [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1237-1252. |
| [10] | FAN Yongsheng, REN Yi, LIU Sichao, FENG Fudong, NIE Lanchun, WANG Xinxin. Application of Plant Growth Regulators in Tomato Production and Their Effects on Fruit Quality [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(1): 313-330. |
| [11] | LU Mingyan, WU Chunhao, ZHAO Ying, YAN Xingkai, LI Honglian, DING Lihua, ZHANG Maojun, WANG Qiang. A New Cold-Hardiness,Disease-Resistant and Late-Maturing Pear Cultivar‘Jiyu’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 13-14. |
| [12] | ZHANG Jingguo, CHEN Qiliang, YANG Xiaoping, FAN Jing, DU Wei, LIU Wei, HU Hongju. A New Early-Maturing Russet-Skin Sand Pear Cultivar‘Jinzaojing’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 15-16. |
| [13] | ZHANG Yanjie, OU Chunqing, WANG Fei, MA Li, QI Liyong, JIANG Shuling. A New High-Quality and Late-Ripening Pear Cultivar‘Xingli 20’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 17-18. |
| [14] | YANG Xiaoping, CHEN Qiliang, ZHANG Jingguo, FAN Jing, DU We, LIU Wei, HU Hongju. A New Late-Ripening,Disease Resistant and High-Quality Sand Pear Cultivar‘Jinbi’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 19-20. |
| [15] | SHUAI Zhengbin, GUO Jianghong, CHAI Dan, XIAN Bengang. A New Luffa Cultivar‘Rongzhen 4’on Balsam Pear Rootstock [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 169-170. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd