Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (8): 2400-2414.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0227
• Cultivation · Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
HU Jin’ge1, BAI Shijian1, SUN Ruifeng2, ZHENG Lijian2, SHA Yonglong1, WU Guohong1,*(
)
Received:2026-03-02
Revised:2026-05-04
Online:2026-08-25
Published:2026-08-25
Contact:
WU Guohong
HU Jin’ge, BAI Shijian, SUN Ruifeng, ZHENG Lijian, SHA Yonglong, WU Guohong. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Microbial Inoculants on Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Community Diversity and Berry Quality in Vineyard[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(8): 2400-2414.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0227
| 化肥减施比 例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 坐果期 Fruiting period | 膨大期 Expansion period | 转色期 Veraison period | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 氮素N/(g · m-2) | 磷酸P2O5/(g · m-2) | 钾素K2O/(g · m-2) | 氮素N/(g · m-2) | 磷酸P2O5/(g · m-2) | 钾素K2O/(g · m-2) | 氮素N/(g · m-2) | 磷酸P2O5/(g · m-2) | 钾素K2O/(g · m-2) | |
| 对照Control | 17.37 | 6.98 | — | 26.63 | 12.50 | 12.00 | — | 12.50 | 12.00 |
| 10 | 15.33 | 7.28 | — | 21.26 | 11.97 | 12.00 | — | 11.97 | 12.00 |
| 20 | 13.89 | 5.58 | — | 18.90 | 9.99 | 12.00 | — | 9.99 | 12.00 |
| 30 | 12.16 | 4.84 | — | 16.58 | 8.75 | 12.00 | — | 8.75 | 12.00 |
Table 1 Chemical fertilizer reduction scheme
| 化肥减施比 例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 坐果期 Fruiting period | 膨大期 Expansion period | 转色期 Veraison period | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 氮素N/(g · m-2) | 磷酸P2O5/(g · m-2) | 钾素K2O/(g · m-2) | 氮素N/(g · m-2) | 磷酸P2O5/(g · m-2) | 钾素K2O/(g · m-2) | 氮素N/(g · m-2) | 磷酸P2O5/(g · m-2) | 钾素K2O/(g · m-2) | |
| 对照Control | 17.37 | 6.98 | — | 26.63 | 12.50 | 12.00 | — | 12.50 | 12.00 |
| 10 | 15.33 | 7.28 | — | 21.26 | 11.97 | 12.00 | — | 11.97 | 12.00 |
| 20 | 13.89 | 5.58 | — | 18.90 | 9.99 | 12.00 | — | 9.99 | 12.00 |
| 30 | 12.16 | 4.84 | — | 16.58 | 8.75 | 12.00 | — | 8.75 | 12.00 |
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | pH | 有机质/% Organic matter | 全氮/(mg · kg-1) Total nitrogen | 速效氮/(mg · kg-1) Available nitrogen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 8.20 ± 0.04 a | 2.79 ± 0.04 b | 670.30 ± 25.36 c | 76.55 ± 1.02 a |
| 10 | 8.12 ± 0.03 a | 4.58 ± 0.81 a | 850.30 ± 12.18 a | 61.85 ± 1.54 b |
| 20 | 8.08 ± 0.03 a | 4.14 ± 0.24 a | 804.82 ± 23.50 ab | 53.37 ± 1.82 c |
| 30 | 7.61 ± 0.51 b | 2.35 ± 0.05 b | 761.97 ± 15.90 b | 76.49 ± 1.11 a |
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 全钾/(mg · kg-1) Total potassium | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available potassium | 全磷/% Total phosphorus | 速效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available phosphorus |
| 对照Control | 3 046.88 ± 172.75 a | 66.87 ± 4.23 a | 0.10 ± 0.01 a | 7.73 ± 1.74 a |
| 10 | 2 904.15 ± 405.27 ab | 61.27 ± 9.63 a | 0.07 ± 0.03 ab | 5.58 ± 0.21 a |
| 20 | 2 732.02 ± 130.89 ab | 61.70 ± 9.95 a | 0.04 ± 0.01 b | 5.73 ± 0.68 a |
| 30 | 2 374.68 ± 221.51 b | 69.18 ± 8.90 a | 0.06 ± 0.00 ab | 6.38 ± 0.16 a |
Table 2 Physical and chemical properties of soil under reduced fertilizer and bacterial agent application
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | pH | 有机质/% Organic matter | 全氮/(mg · kg-1) Total nitrogen | 速效氮/(mg · kg-1) Available nitrogen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 8.20 ± 0.04 a | 2.79 ± 0.04 b | 670.30 ± 25.36 c | 76.55 ± 1.02 a |
| 10 | 8.12 ± 0.03 a | 4.58 ± 0.81 a | 850.30 ± 12.18 a | 61.85 ± 1.54 b |
| 20 | 8.08 ± 0.03 a | 4.14 ± 0.24 a | 804.82 ± 23.50 ab | 53.37 ± 1.82 c |
| 30 | 7.61 ± 0.51 b | 2.35 ± 0.05 b | 761.97 ± 15.90 b | 76.49 ± 1.11 a |
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 全钾/(mg · kg-1) Total potassium | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available potassium | 全磷/% Total phosphorus | 速效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available phosphorus |
| 对照Control | 3 046.88 ± 172.75 a | 66.87 ± 4.23 a | 0.10 ± 0.01 a | 7.73 ± 1.74 a |
| 10 | 2 904.15 ± 405.27 ab | 61.27 ± 9.63 a | 0.07 ± 0.03 ab | 5.58 ± 0.21 a |
| 20 | 2 732.02 ± 130.89 ab | 61.70 ± 9.95 a | 0.04 ± 0.01 b | 5.73 ± 0.68 a |
| 30 | 2 374.68 ± 221.51 b | 69.18 ± 8.90 a | 0.06 ± 0.00 ab | 6.38 ± 0.16 a |
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 原始序列 Raw tags | 优化序列数 Clean tags | 覆盖度 Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 79 944 ± 84 a | 74 090 ± 224 a | 0.9986 ± 0.0001 a |
| 10 | 80 001 ± 77 a | 73 415 ± 297 a | 0.9975 ± 0.0016 a |
| 20 | 79 962 ± 286 a | 74 349 ± 292 a | 0.9986 ± 0.0002 a |
| 30 | 80 072 ± 70 a | 74 170 ± 164 a | 0.9994 ± 0.0004 a |
Table 3 Sequencing results of soil bacteria under reduced fertilizer and bacterial agent application
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 原始序列 Raw tags | 优化序列数 Clean tags | 覆盖度 Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 79 944 ± 84 a | 74 090 ± 224 a | 0.9986 ± 0.0001 a |
| 10 | 80 001 ± 77 a | 73 415 ± 297 a | 0.9975 ± 0.0016 a |
| 20 | 79 962 ± 286 a | 74 349 ± 292 a | 0.9986 ± 0.0002 a |
| 30 | 80 072 ± 70 a | 74 170 ± 164 a | 0.9994 ± 0.0004 a |
Fig. 1 Venn diagram and number of bacteria OTU distribution in soil under reduced fertilizer and bacterial agent application 10%,20% and 30% were rate of fertilizer reduction. The same below
Fig. 2 Analysis of soil bacterial diversity under reduced fertilizer and bacterial agent application Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences(Tukey,P < 0.05)
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 果穗质量/g Bunch weight | 果粒质量/g Berry weight | 果粒纵径/mm Longitudinal diameter | 果粒横径/mm Transverse diameter | 果形指数 Shape index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 1 152.60 ± 135.20 a | 10.50 ± 0.40 c | 31.46 ± 1.07 a | 24.74 ± 1.09 b | 1.27 ± 0.07 a |
| 10 | 1 061.78 ± 174.27 a | 12.98 ± 0.20 a | 32.38 ± 1.13 a | 25.35 ± 1.15 b | 1.28 ± 0.09 a |
| 20 | 1 037.86 ± 157.37 a | 11.73 ± 0.12 b | 32.84±1.42 a | 26.74 ± 1.01 a | 1.23 ± 0.05 a |
| 30 | 979.20 ± 204.77 a | 11.70 ± 0.30 b | 31.78±1.03 a | 25.45 ± 1.23 ab | 1.25 ± 0.09 a |
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 可溶性固形物/°Brix Soluble solids | 可滴定酸/% Titrable acid | 维生素C/(mg · kg-1) Vitamin C | 产量/(kg · hm-2) Yield | |
| 对照Control | 18.15 ± 0.93 a | 0.44 ± 0.02 a | 0.32 ± 0.01 b | 51.66 ± 1.14 a | |
| 10 | 18.38 ± 0.44 a | 0.43 ± 0.02 a | 0.40 ± 0.03 a | 48.39 ± 0.57 ab | |
| 20 | 18.54 ± 0.85 a | 0.45 ± 0.04 a | 0.31 ± 0.00 b | 52.59 ± 1.57 a | |
| 30 | 17.96 ± 0.42 a | 0.46 ± 0.02 a | 0.31 ± 0.04 b | 41.52 ± 1.20 b |
Table 4 Difference of fruit size and quality of‘Xinyu’grape under reduced fertilizer and bacterial agent application
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 果穗质量/g Bunch weight | 果粒质量/g Berry weight | 果粒纵径/mm Longitudinal diameter | 果粒横径/mm Transverse diameter | 果形指数 Shape index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 1 152.60 ± 135.20 a | 10.50 ± 0.40 c | 31.46 ± 1.07 a | 24.74 ± 1.09 b | 1.27 ± 0.07 a |
| 10 | 1 061.78 ± 174.27 a | 12.98 ± 0.20 a | 32.38 ± 1.13 a | 25.35 ± 1.15 b | 1.28 ± 0.09 a |
| 20 | 1 037.86 ± 157.37 a | 11.73 ± 0.12 b | 32.84±1.42 a | 26.74 ± 1.01 a | 1.23 ± 0.05 a |
| 30 | 979.20 ± 204.77 a | 11.70 ± 0.30 b | 31.78±1.03 a | 25.45 ± 1.23 ab | 1.25 ± 0.09 a |
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | 可溶性固形物/°Brix Soluble solids | 可滴定酸/% Titrable acid | 维生素C/(mg · kg-1) Vitamin C | 产量/(kg · hm-2) Yield | |
| 对照Control | 18.15 ± 0.93 a | 0.44 ± 0.02 a | 0.32 ± 0.01 b | 51.66 ± 1.14 a | |
| 10 | 18.38 ± 0.44 a | 0.43 ± 0.02 a | 0.40 ± 0.03 a | 48.39 ± 0.57 ab | |
| 20 | 18.54 ± 0.85 a | 0.45 ± 0.04 a | 0.31 ± 0.00 b | 52.59 ± 1.57 a | |
| 30 | 17.96 ± 0.42 a | 0.46 ± 0.02 a | 0.31 ± 0.04 b | 41.52 ± 1.20 b |
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | L* | a* | b* | C* | CIRG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 41.31 ± 3.47 a | 8.68 ± 2.45 b | 6.18 ± 3.28 a | 11.28 ± 1.18 a | 2.78 ± 0.56 b |
| 10 | 33.60 ± 2.74 b | 11.58 ± 1.75 a | 1.79 ± 1.48 b | 11.81 ± 1.70 a | 3.79 ± 0.43 a |
| 20 | 32.92 ± 2.84 b | 13.42 ± 1.49 a | 0.70 ± 1.29 b | 9.54 ± 1.05 b | 4.20 ± 0.42 a |
| 30 | 32.71 ± 3.35 b | 11.33 ± 1.62 a | 1.26 ± 1.94 b | 11.55 ± 1.59 a | 3.98 ± 0.58 a |
Table 5 Color difference of‘Xinyu’grape under different treatments
| 化肥减施比例/% Rate of fertilizer reduction | L* | a* | b* | C* | CIRG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照Control | 41.31 ± 3.47 a | 8.68 ± 2.45 b | 6.18 ± 3.28 a | 11.28 ± 1.18 a | 2.78 ± 0.56 b |
| 10 | 33.60 ± 2.74 b | 11.58 ± 1.75 a | 1.79 ± 1.48 b | 11.81 ± 1.70 a | 3.79 ± 0.43 a |
| 20 | 32.92 ± 2.84 b | 13.42 ± 1.49 a | 0.70 ± 1.29 b | 9.54 ± 1.05 b | 4.20 ± 0.42 a |
| 30 | 32.71 ± 3.35 b | 11.33 ± 1.62 a | 1.26 ± 1.94 b | 11.55 ± 1.59 a | 3.98 ± 0.58 a |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
|
鲍士旦. 2005. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
|
|
| [3] |
|
|
陈晓莉, 杨宏宇, 韩佳, 满华丽, 李元鹏, 师桂英. 2024. 化肥减量配施微生物菌肥对兰州百合光合生理特性的影响. 西北植物学报, 44 (9):1365-1375.
|
|
| [4] |
|
|
陈晓燕, 王小琳, 谢先进. 2021. 不同微生物菌剂对玉米产量及土壤肥力的影响. 热带农业科学, 41 (9):11-16.
|
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
|
戴雅婷, 闫志坚, 谢继红, 吴洪新, 徐林波, 侯向阳, 高丽, 崔艳伟. 2017. 基于高通量测序的两种植被恢复类型根际土壤细菌多样性研究. 土壤学报, 54 (3):735-748.
|
|
| [7] |
|
|
丁新景, 黄雅丽, 敬如岩, 马风云, 安然, 田琪, 陈博杰. 2018. 基于高通量测序的黄河三角洲4种人工林土壤细菌结果及多样性研究. 生态学报, 38 (16):5857-5864.
|
|
| [8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.020 URL |
| [9] |
|
|
方成, 岳明灿, 王东升, 李伟明, 徐莉, 陈小云, 焦加国. 2020. 化肥减施配施微生物菌剂对鲜食玉米生长和土壤肥力的影响. 土壤, 52 (4):743-749.
|
|
| [10] |
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.12.011 |
|
冯洁. 2017. 植物病原细菌分类最新进展. 中国农业科学, 50 (12):2305-2314.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.12.011 |
|
| [11] |
doi: 10.1890/05-1839 pmid: 17601128 |
| [12] |
|
|
高俊凤. 2006. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
|
|
| [13] |
|
|
郭艳兰, 牟德生, 张勤德, 赵连鑫, 李栋, 王鑫. 2023. 化肥减量配施不同用量微生物菌肥对黑比诺葡萄生长、品质及土壤肥力的影响. 江苏农业科学, 39 (9):1938-1944.
|
|
| [14] |
|
|
韩洋, 乔冬梅, 齐学斌, 李平, 郭魏, 崔丙健, 陆红飞, 赵宇龙, 白芳芳, 庞颖. 2020. 再生水灌溉水平对土壤盐分积累与细菌群落组成的影响. 农业工程学报, 36 (4):106-117.
|
|
| [15] |
|
|
黄志鹏, 吴海宁, 唐秀梅, 贺梁琼, 韩柱强, 钟瑞春, 熊发前, 刘菁, 唐荣华, 蒋菁. 2020. 化肥减施对花生根际土壤细菌群落结构和多样性的影响. 花生学报, 48 (3):8-13.
|
|
| [16] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148944 URL |
| [17] |
|
|
贾东海, 宋贤明, 顾元国, 李强, 曾幼玲, 苗昊翠, 郭美丽, 侯献飞. 2024. 化肥减量配施微生物菌剂对膜下滴灌红花生长发育及产量的影响. 新疆农业科学, 61 (4):781-790.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.001 |
|
| [18] |
|
|
林协全, 张航, 张麟功, 叶泽霖, 黄思琦, 严洪, 邹双全, 邹小兴. 2023. 化肥减量配施生物炭对木姜叶柯土壤肥力与真菌群落特征的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(11):41-49.
|
|
| [19] |
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.12.013 |
|
刘海洋, 王伟, 张仁福, 雷斌, 姚举. 2021. 施用微生物菌剂对棉田土壤细菌群落多样性及种群结构的影响. 新疆农业科学, 58 (12):2256-2264.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.12.013 |
|
| [20] |
|
|
刘钦普. 2017. 中国化肥施用强度及环境安全阈值时空变化. 农业工程学报, 33 (6):214-221.
|
|
| [21] |
|
|
刘阳, 王馨悦, 陈拓, 章高森, 武发思, 张威, 刘光琇, 吴玉洁, 徐业腾, 田茂. 2021. 可培养细菌多样性及抗辐射--抗氧化相关性特征:以库姆塔格沙漠东缘为例. 中国环境科学, 41 (12):5921-5932.
|
|
| [22] |
|
|
刘洋, 曾全超, 黄懿梅. 2016. 基于454高通量测序的黄土高原不同乔木林土壤细菌多样性特征. 中国环境科学, 36 (11):3487-3494.
|
|
| [23] |
|
|
刘洋洋, 束怀瑞, 陈伟. 2021. 混施微生物菌剂和有机肥对‘新红星’葡萄解袋后果实品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(1):169-179.
|
|
| [24] |
|
|
路梅. 2018. 纳帕海湿地退化对土壤微生物群落结构及多样性的影响[博士论文]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
|
|
| [25] |
|
|
马忠明, 陈娟, 牛小霞, 罗双龙. 2021. 减施化肥和配施有机肥对酿酒葡萄梅鹿辄产量和品质的影响. 水土保持通报, 41 (2):188-193,200.
|
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2024-0230 |
|
牛建美, 赖恭梯, 李思雨, 郭奥琳, 陈冰星, 陈杏, 刘波, 赖呈纯. 2024. 复合微生物菌剂对葡萄生长、品质及根际土壤环境的影响. 生物技术通报, 40 (8):264-274.
|
|
| [28] |
|
|
钱建民. 2015. 微生物制剂对土壤肥力及马铃薯产量品质的影响[硕士论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学.
|
|
| [29] |
|
|
撒晓梅, 丁琴, 李明. 2025. 蚯蚓粪和微生物菌剂对土壤养分及红地球葡萄生理特性的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 60 (1):158-165.
|
|
| [30] |
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.013 URL |
| [31] |
doi: 10.3390/agriculture11050389 URL |
| [32] |
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247309 URL |
| [33] |
|
|
孙豪杰, 王静, 程昱润, 肖国举, 毕江涛. 2024. 施肥对贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄园土壤细菌多样性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(6):45-55.
|
|
| [34] |
|
|
孙勇, 蒋继宏, 孙忠胜, 布会敏. 2018. 江西原生态种植甘薯根际细菌的溶磷、产生长激素及抑菌能力. 江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版), 36 (2):29-33.
|
|
| [35] |
|
|
唐汉, 王金武, 徐常塑, 周文琪, 王金峰, 王秀. 2019. 化肥减施增效关键技术研究进展分析. 农业机械学报, 50 (4):1-19.
|
|
| [36] |
|
|
王辉, 刘丽, 黄宇飞, 邹春蕾, 赵颖, 王琦, 刘长远. 2021. 黄炳曲霉ASD对辣椒疫病根际真菌群落结构及土壤功能的影响. 中国生物防治学报, 37 (4):796-803.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.04.015 |
|
| [37] |
doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-1708-z pmid: 32085752 |
| [38] |
doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0849-y pmid: 27670433 |
| [39] |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.03.002 URL |
| [40] |
|
|
吴雪, 王坤元, 牛晓丽, 胡田田. 2014. 西红柿综合营养品质指标构建及其对水肥供应的相应. 农业工程学报, 30 (7):119-127.
|
|
| [41] |
Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Quality and Technical Supervision Administration. DB 65/T4518-2022. Technical regulation for reducing chemical fertilizer and pesticide application in vineyards. (in Chinese)
|
|
新疆维吾尔自治区质量技术监督管理局. DB 65/T4518-2022. 葡萄园化学肥料和农药减施技术方案.
|
|
| [42] |
XuYang,Zhang Guanchu,Ding Hong,Ci Dunwei,Qin Feifei,Zhang Zhimeng,Dai Liangxiang. 2020. Effects of drought and salt stress on bacterial community structure of peanut rhizosphere soil and peanut yield. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31 (4):1305-1313. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.036 |
|
徐扬, 张冠初, 丁红, 慈敦伟, 秦斐斐, 张智猛, 戴良香. 2020. 干旱与盐胁迫对花生根际土壤细菌群落结构和花生产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 31 (4):1305-1313.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.036 |
|
| [43] |
|
|
杨楠, 谭雪莲, 郭天文, 张平良, 刘晓伟. 2023. 增加微生物菌剂对马铃薯根际土壤细菌多样性的影响. 西北农业学报, 3 (5):781-790.
|
|
| [44] |
|
|
杨亚东, 王志敏, 曾昭海. 2018. 长期施肥和灌溉对土壤细菌数量、多样性和群落结构的影响. 中国农业科学, 51 (2):290-301.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.02.009 |
|
| [45] |
|
|
叶雯, 李永春, 喻卫武, 叶晓明, 钱宇汀, 戴文圣. 2018. 不同种植年限香榧根际土壤微生物多样性. 应用生态学报, 29 (11):3783-3792.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201811.034 |
|
| [46] |
|
|
岳明灿, 王志国, 陈秋实, 徐明喜, 李伟明, 吴旭东, 刘庆叶, 陈莉莉, 王东升, 焦加国. 2020. 减施化肥配施微生物菌剂对西红柿产质量和土壤肥力的影响. 土壤, 52 (1):68-73.
|
|
| [47] |
|
|
张德楠, 张燕钊, 腾秋梅, 徐广平, 黄科朝, 吕仕洪, 孙英杰. 2023. 化肥减施配施微生物菌肥对圣女果产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(10):36-47.
|
|
| [48] |
|
|
张慧珍, 张齐, 高邦牢, 缪成鹏, 王群力, 慧竹梅, 王雪飞. 2024. 有机无机肥配施菌剂对葡萄园土壤、果实及葡萄酒品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(1):129-140.
|
|
| [49] |
|
|
张煜. 2020. 微生物菌肥对烟草品质及土壤细菌多样性影响的研究[博士论文]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学.
|
|
| [50] |
|
|
赵津聪, 撒晓梅, 李明, 戴仲龙, 孙霄, 王宏. 2024. 有机肥和微生物菌剂配施对‘赤霞珠’葡萄根际土壤细菌群落多样性的影响. 西北农业学报, 33 (11):2134-2145.
|
|
| [51] |
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.005 URL |
| [52] |
|
|
朱望帅, 韩振, 胡一涵, 祝德玉, 陈化榜, 赵茂林, 王健林. 2022. 化肥减施配施微生物菌肥对盐碱地土壤质量及玉米产量和品质的影响. 山东农业科学, 54 (12):91-96.
|
| [1] | XI Xiaojun, JIANG Aili, ZHA Qian, YIN Xiangjing, SUN Pengpeng. A New Muscat Grape Cultivar‘Shenxin’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(S1): 47-48. |
| [2] | PU Zhanyue, ZHAO Nan, WANG Yidong, XIN Ying, GU Peiwen. Identification,Pathogenicity Analysis,and Biological Characterization of Lasiodiplodia theobromae Causing Grapevine Canker in Ningxia Wine Grape Region [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(8): 2454-2468. |
| [3] | TAN Yanxiao, HAN Shuang, LENG Songning, CHEN Xiaole, LIU Bailin, SHI Hongmei, HE Weihua, ZHANG Yu. Identification of the DGK Family Genes in Vitis vinifera and Functional Study of VvDGK1 Under Salt Stress [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(7): 2034-2052. |
| [4] | QIN Lei, LU Lei, TANG Jin, YU Yajing, YIN Chengmiao, JIANG Weitao, MAO Zhiquan. The Effects of Aged Walnut and Grape Orchards Soil on the Growth of Malus hupehensis Seedlings [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(7): 2129-2143. |
| [5] | WANG Xiaoyue, REN Jiancheng, ZHANG Congying, LIU Zhenhua, LU Haocheng, YAN Ailing, ZHANG Lixia, WANG Huiling, SUN Lei. Effects of Different Regulated Deficit Irrigation Treatments on Growth and Fruit Quality of‘Ruidu Kemei’Grape [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(7): 2144-2168. |
| [6] | LIU Lin, SAI Xiaoling, SANG Haiyang, LU Ruxia, XIANG Benchun, ZHENG Yinying. Analysis and Molecular Identification of Grapevine Virus and Viroid Genomes in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(6): 1765-1778. |
| [7] | ZHU Chunmei, CHEN Yao, LIU Zhiyu, ZHAO Baolong, SUN Junli. Effects of Saline-Alkali Treatment on Leaf Morphology,Physiology and Expression of Genes Related to Stress Signal in 16 Grapevine Cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(3): 653-670. |
| [8] | CHEN Xi, WEN Xue, ZHANG Yanan, WANG Yong, LI Yuling, SUN Feng, ZHAO Yanzhuo, NIU Zaozhu, XU Yan, LIU Guotian. Investigation of the Key Factors Influencing the Embryo Rescue Breeding Efficiency of Polyploid Grapes [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(3): 671-682. |
| [9] | WEI Tianjun, LI Hui, WANG Guiyun, CHEN Weijun, LI Guangming. Effects of Growing Grasses on Soil Microbial Diversity,Soil Metabolites and Fruits Quality in‘Lingwuchangzao’Jujube Orchard [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(1): 185-201. |
| [10] | BAO Min, TIAN Yaping, LI Fan, WEI Xixi, LIU Miaomiao, HASSAN Jawad, LI Zhi, ZHAO Yijie, GAO Min, WANG Xiping. Embryological,Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms Underlying GA3-Induced Seedlessness in Grapes [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(1): 65-81. |
| [11] | GENG Hao, GE Mengqing, DING Yunlong, XU Weidong, CONG Chunlei, YAN Hongwei, QIAN Yu, LIU Yufeng. A New Medium Ripening Table Grape Cultivar‘Yuanjinxiang’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 31-32. |
| [12] | GAO Min, ZHAO Ning, LI Zhi, WANG Xianhang, TU Mingxing, GUO Junqiang, WANG Xiping. A New Table Grape Cultivar‘Qinpu 3 Hao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 33-34. |
| [13] | WEI Xixi, ZHAO Ning, LI Zhi, WANG Xianhang, TU Mingxing, GAO Min, WANG Xiping. A New Table Grape Cultivar‘Qinpu 4 Hao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 35-36. |
| [14] | HAO Yan, ZHU Yanfang, GAO Bo. A New Seedless Table Grape Cultivar‘Ziyan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 37-38. |
| [15] | NI Peijin, AI Jun, SHI Guangli, WANG Zhenxing, SUN Dan, SUN Yanfeng, LIU Xiaoying. A New Cold-Resistant Wine Grape Cultivar‘Fuhong’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 39-40. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd