https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner1.jpg|#|苹果
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner2.jpg|#|甘蓝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner3.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner4.jpg|#|灵芝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner5.jpg|#|桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner6.jpg|#|黄瓜
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner7.jpg|#|蝴蝶兰
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner8.jpg|#|樱桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner9.jpg|#|观赏荷花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner10.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner11.jpg|#|月季
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner12.jpg|#|菊花

园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1753-1764.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0529

• 植物保护 • 上一篇    下一篇

‘三季’梨炭疽病病原鉴定、杀菌剂毒力测定及梨种质抗性评价

刘思彤1,2, 阎维巍2, 孙晓楠2, 张鑫楠2, 田路明2, 李云鹏1,*(), 贾晓辉2,*()   

  1. 1 黑龙江大学现代农业与生态环境学院, 哈尔滨 150080
    2 中国农业科学院果树研究所, 辽宁兴城 125100
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-23 修回日期:2026-02-12 出版日期:2026-06-24 发布日期:2026-06-24
  • 通讯作者:
    * E-mail:
  • 基金资助:
    现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资助(CARS-29-19); 中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目(CAAS-ASTIP-RIP); 辽宁省博士启动基金项目(2021-MS-036); 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(1610182024007)

Pathogen Identification,Fungicide Efficacy Assessment,and Germplasm Resistance Evaluation of Anthracnose in‘Docteur Jules Guyot’Pear

LIU Sitong1,2, YAN Weiwei2, SUN Xiaonan2, ZHANG Xinnan2, TIAN Luming2, LI Yunpeng1,*(), JIA Xiaohui2,*()   

  1. 1 College of Modern Agriculture and Ecological EnvironmentHeilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
    2 Research Institute of PomologyChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Xingcheng, Liaoning 125100, China

摘要:

本研究旨在探明引起‘三季’梨炭疽病的病原菌,筛选高效杀菌剂和梨抗炭疽病种质,为病害科学防控和抗炭疽病梨品种选育提供新的依据。采用形态学观察、ITS测序分析结合柯赫氏法则验证进行病原鉴定,采用菌丝生长速率法结合孢子萌发抑制率法对24种杀菌剂进行病原室内毒力测定,采用菌饼针刺接种法对76份梨种质进行病斑直径测定,通过平均病斑直径法结合聚类分析法将梨种质划分为高抗、抗、中抗、感和高感5类,将欧式距离设置为8作为聚类分析法的最佳分割点,对76份梨种质抗Colletotrichum gloeosporioides能力进行科学划分。结果表明,引起‘三季’梨炭疽病病原为胶孢炭疽菌(C. gloeosporioides);室内毒力测定中,咪唑类杀菌剂咪鲜胺抑菌效果较强,对菌丝生长和孢子萌发的EC50值分别为0.047和0.046 mg · L-1,其次为苯并咪唑类杀菌剂多菌灵,EC50值分别为0.075和0.040 mg · L-1。两种方法综合评价筛选出高抗种质13份,其中‘晚三吉’抗性最强,‘官红宵’次之;高感品种7份,其中‘黄冠’最感病,‘窝窝梨’次之。

关键词: 梨, 炭疽病, 胶孢炭疽菌, 毒力测定, 抗性评价

Abstract:

This study aimed to clarify the pathogen responsible for anthracnose in‘Docteur Jules Guyot’pear,screen effective fungicides,and identify resistant pear germplasm to provide a new basis for scientific disease control and breeding of anthracnose-resistant pear cultivars. Pathogen identification was performed through morphological observation,ITS sequencing,and verification using Koch’s postulates. In vitro toxicity determination of 24 fungicides was conducted using the mycelial growth rate method and spore germination inhibition rate method. Additionally,The lesion diameter of 76 pear germplasm accessions was determined via the mycelial disc pin-prick inoculation method. Based on the average lesion diameter method combined with cluster analysis,these germplasm accessions were categorized into five resistance grades(highly resistant,resistant,moderately resistant,susceptible,and highly susceptible)to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. With the Euclidean distance set at 8 as the optimal cut-off point for cluster analysis,the resistance of the 76 pear germplasm accessions to C. gloeosporioides was scientifically classified. The results showed that the causal agent of‘Docteur Jules Guyot’pear anthracnose was C. gloeosporioides. Among the tested fungicides,prochloraz(an imidazole fungicide)exhibited the strongest inhibitory effect,with EC50 values of 0.047 mg · L-1 for mycelial growth and 0.046 mg · L-1 for spore germination. This was followed by carbendazim(a benzimidazoles fungicide),with EC50 values of 0.075 mg · L-1 and 0.040 mg · L-1,respectively. Comprehensive evaluation using both methods identified 13 highly resistant germplasms,with‘Wansanji’being the most resistant,followed by‘Guanhongxiao’,and 7 highly susceptible cultivars,with‘Huangguan’being the most susceptible,followed by‘Wowo’pear.

Key words: pear, anthracnose, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, virulence assay, resistance identification