264份梨种质资源枝条、叶片表型多样性评价

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0325

园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 1237-1252.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0325

• 遗传育种·种质资源·分子生物学 • 下一篇

264份梨种质资源枝条、叶片表型多样性评价

徐慧男¹^,^*, 高梦洁¹^,^*, 齐开杰¹, 崔艳波³, 吴潇¹, 陶书田¹^,², 张绍铃¹^,²^,^**(), 殷豪¹^,^**()

¹ 南京农业大学梨工程技术研究中心，南京 210095
² 南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，南京 210095
³ 南京宁翠生物种业有限公司，南京 211121

收稿日期:2025-07-17 修回日期:2026-04-07 出版日期:2026-05-25 发布日期:2026-05-26
通讯作者:
^** E-mail：nnzsl@njau.edu.cn，
yinhao@njau.edu.cn
作者简介:
*共同第一作者
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项(2024A02006-1)

Phenotypic Diversity Evaluation of Shoots and Leaves in 264 Pear Germplasm Accessions

XU Huinan¹, GAO Mengjie¹, QI Kaijie¹, CUI Yanbo³, WU Xiao¹, TAO Shutian¹^,², ZHANG Shaoling¹^,²^,^**(), YIN Hao¹^,^**()

¹ Centre of Pear Engineering Technology Research， Nanjing Agricultural University， Nanjing 210095， China
² State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement， Nanjing Agriculural University， Nanjing 210095， China
³ Nanjing Ningcui Biological Seed Industry Company Limited， Nanjing 210095， China

Received:2025-07-17 Revised:2026-04-07 Published:2026-05-25 Online:2026-05-26
Contact:
^** E-mail：nnzsl@njau.edu.cn，
yinhao@njau.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以南京农业大学梨种质资源圃保存的264份梨种质资源为研究对象，对一年生枝颜色、皮孔数量等22个描述型性状和叶柄、叶片长度等10个数值型性状开展Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、变异系数、种群间和种群内多样性的比较分析、数值型性状的相关性和主成分分析以及种群聚类分析。研究结果显示：描述型性状和数值型性状的多样性指数分别介于0.025 ~ 1.637和2.004 ~ 2.087之间，且数值型性状的多样性明显高于描述型性状。描述型性状中幼叶颜色的多样性指数最高，为1.637。10个数值型性状的变异系数范围为11.18% ~ 36.56%，其中叶面积的变异系数最高，为36.56%。梨叶片和枝条的9个数值型性状种群间和种群内的变异均较高，对梨种质资源的多样性有重要贡献。综合相关性分析和主成分分析，除叶形指数外，叶面积、一年生枝长度和花芽长度可作为评价枝条和叶片性状变异的重要指标。基于聚类分析，将264份梨种质资源划分5个类群，西洋梨能够与大多数东方梨区分开，而东方梨中的白梨和砂梨未形成独立的类群，呈现交错分布。

关键词: 梨, 种质资源, 枝条特征, 叶片特征, 表型性状, 遗传多样性

Abstract:

Using 264 pear germplasm accessions preserved in the Pear Germplasm Repository of Nanjing Agricultural University as the research materials，22 descriptive traits，including one-year-old shoot color and lenticel density，and 10 quantitative traits，including petiole length and leaf length，were investigated. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index，coefficient of variation，comparative analyses of inter- and intra-population diversity，correlation analysis and principal component analysis of quantitative traits，and cluster analysis were conducted. The results showed that the diversity indices of the descriptive and quantitative traits ranged from 0.025 to 1.637 and from 2.004 to 2.087，the diversity of quantitative traits was markedly higher than that of descriptive traits. Among the descriptive traits，young leaf color had the highest diversity index（H' = 1.637）. The coefficients of variation of the 10 quantitative traits ranged from 11.18% to 36.56%，with leaf area showing the highest value（CV = 36.56%）. Both inter- and intra-population variation of the nine quantitative traits related to shoots and leaves were relatively high，indicating that both contributed substantially to the phenotypic diversity of pear germplasm resources. Based on the comprehensive analysis of correlation and principal component analysis，leaf area，one-year shoot length，and flower bud length can serve as important indicators for evaluating the variation in shoot and leaf traits. Cluster analysis divided the 264 pear germplasm accessions into five groups. Pyrus communis could be distinguished from most Oriental pears，whereas P. bretschneideri and P. pyrifolia within the Oriental pear group did not form independent clusters but showed an intermingled distribution.

Key words: pear, germplasm resources, shoot traits, leaf traits, phenotypic traits, genetic diversity

徐慧男, 高梦洁, 齐开杰, 崔艳波, 吴潇, 陶书田, 张绍铃, 殷豪. 264份梨种质资源枝条、叶片表型多样性评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(5): 1237-1252.

XU Huinan, GAO Mengjie, QI Kaijie, CUI Yanbo, WU Xiao, TAO Shutian, ZHANG Shaoling, YIN Hao. Phenotypic Diversity Evaluation of Shoots and Leaves in 264 Pear Germplasm Accessions[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1237-1252.

图/表 12

参考文献 31

[1]	Asadollahi O, Ehtesham N A, Hejazi S H, Abdollahi H. 2021. Multivariate analyses of phenotypic traits in some specious of pear(Pyrus spp.). Journal of Plant Production Research, 28 (4):177-194.
[2]	Bai Yu’e, Li Jinpu, Shi Pengfei, Wang Rongxue, Gao Ying, Hu Zhijian, Yang Rong. 2024. Genetic diversity analysis of different pear varieties based on phenotypic traits. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 56 (2):30-38. (in Chinese)
	白玉娥, 李今普, 师鹏飞, 王荣学, 高颖, 胡志健, 杨荣. 2024. 基于表型性状的不同梨品种遗传多样性分析. 山东农业科学, 56 (2):30-38.
[3]	Bao Jingkai, Wang Yan, Pan Yiling, Lu Dengyang, Yan Fenfen, Wu Cuiyun. 2025. Analysis of inheritance of leaf phenotypic characters in jujube hybrid progeny. Molecular Plant Breeding, 23 (2):495-501. (in Chinese)
	鲍荆凯, 王艳, 潘依玲, 卢登洋, 闫芬芬, 吴翠云. 2025. 枣杂交后代叶片表型性状的遗传规律分析. 分子植物育种, 23 (2):495-501.
[4]	Cao Yufen, Liu Fengzhi, Gao Yuan, Jiang Lijie, Wang Kun, Ma Zhiyong, Zhang Kaichun. 2007. SSR Analysis of genetic diversity of pear cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 34 (2):305-310. (in Chinese)
	曹玉芬, 刘凤之, 高源, 姜立杰, 王昆, 马智勇, 张开春. 2007. 梨栽培品种SSR鉴定及遗传多样性. 园艺学报, 34 (2):305-310.
[5]	Cao Yufen, Liu Fengzhi, Hu Hongju. 2006. Descriptors and data standard for pear. Beijing: China Agriculture Press:14-20. (in Chinese)
	曹玉芬, 刘凤之, 胡红菊. 2006. 梨种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社:14-20.
[6]	Cao Yufen, Zhang Shaoling. 2020. Genetic resources of Chinese pear. Beijing: China Agriculture Press:24-35. (in Chinese)
	曹玉芬, 张绍铃. 2020. 中国梨遗传资源. 北京: 中国农业出版社:24-35.
[7]	Chang Y J, Cao Y F, Zhang J M, Tian L M, Dong X G, Zhang Y, Qi D, Zhang X S. 2017. Study on chloroplast DNA diversity of cultivated and wild pears(Pyrus L.) in Northern China. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 13 (2):44.
[8]	Ge Song, Wang Mingxiu, Chen Yuewu. 1988. Genetic structure of Masson pine populations studied by isozyme markers. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,(4):399-409. (in Chinese)
	葛颂, 王明庥, 陈岳武. 1988. 用同工酶研究马尾松群体的遗传结构. 林业科学,(4):399-409.
[9]	Guo Li, Wu Cuiyun, Tang Zhanghu, Fan Guoquan, Jiang Xi, Yang Zhi. 2021. The diversity of leaf shape characters of pear germplasm resources in Xinjiang. Journal of Shihezi University(Natural Science), 39 (4):463-469. (in Chinese) doi: 10. 13880 /j． cnki． 65－1174 /n． 2021. 21. 010
	郭丽, 吴翠云, 唐章虎, 樊国全, 姜喜, 杨植. 2021. 新疆地区梨种质资源叶表型性状的多样性. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 39 (4):463-469.
[10]	Guo Rui, Cao Yufen, Zhang Ying, Yang Xiang, Nie Hanyu. 2022. Comparative analysis of flowering and leaf growth characteristics form different germplasm resources of pear. Journal of Fruit Resources, 3 (2):5-12. (in Chinese)
	郭瑞, 曹玉芬, 张莹, 杨祥, 聂晗宇. 2022. 不同梨资源开花及叶片生长特性比较分析. 果树资源学报, 3 (2):5-12.
[11]	Guo Ying. 2019. Agronomic traits evaluation and genetic diversity of pear germplasm resources[M. D. Dissertation]. Alar: Tarim University. (in Chinese)
	郭颖. 2019. 梨种质资源农艺性状评价及其遗传多样性研究[硕士论文]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学.
[12]	He Wanlin, Shi Lu, Li Yahui, Liang Ying, Zhang Zhiyong. 2022. Research progress of pear fruit quality and its impact factors. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 63 (2):330-333. (in Chinese)
	何婉琳, 施露, 李亚辉, 梁颖, 张志勇. 2022. 梨果实品质及其影响因素研究进展. 浙江农业科学, 63 (2):330-333. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20213250
[13]	Khorshidi S, Davarynejad G, Samiei L, Moghaddam M. 2017. Study of genetic diversity of pear genotypes and cultivars(Pyrus communis L.) using inter-simple sequence repeat markers(ISSR). Erwerbs-Obstbau, 59 (4):301-308. doi: 10.1007/s10341-017-0325-y URL
[14]	Kocsisné G M, Bolla D, Anhalt-Brüderl U C M, Forneck A, Taller J, Kocsis L. 2020. Genetic diversity and similarity of pear(Pyrus communis L.) cultivars in central Europe revealed by SSR markers. Genetic Resources Crop Evolution,67:1755-1763
[15]	Liu Qingwen. 2016. Identification of pear genetic diversity and construction of population structure by a set of SSR markers[M. D. Dissertation]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	刘清文. 2016. SSR分子标记在梨属植物遗传多样性和群体结构研究中的应用[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
[16]	Liu Yin, Chen Tao, Zhang Jing, Wang Jue, Wang Hao, Tang Haoru, Wang Xiaorong. 2016. Genetic diversity analysis of Chinese cherry landraces (Prunus pseudocerasus)based on phenotypic traits. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 43 (11):2119-2132. (in Chinese)
	刘胤, 陈涛, 张静, 王珏, 王浩, 汤浩茹, 王小蓉. 2016. 中国樱桃地方种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 园艺学报, 43 (11):2119-2132.
[17]	Monte-Corvo L, Cabrita L, Oliveira C, Leitao J. 2000. Assessment of genetic relationships among Pyrus species and cultivars using AFLP and RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,47:257-265.
[18]	Ounia R, Zborowska A, Sehic J, Choulak S, Hormaza JI, Garkava-Gustavsson L, Mars M. 2020. Genetic diversity and structure of tunisian local pear germplasm as revealed by SSR markers. Horticultural Plant Journal, 6 (2):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2020.03.003
[19]	Teng Y, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Itai A. 2002. Genetic relationships of Pyrus species and cultivars native to East Asia revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 127 (2):262-270. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.127.2.262 URL
[20]	Teng Y, Yue X, Zheng X, Cai D. 2015. Genetic clue to the origin of cultivated Asian pears inferred from cpDNA haplotypes. Acta Horticulturae,1094:31-39.
[21]	Vidaković A, Liber Z, Šatović Z, Idžojtić M, Volenec I, Zegnal I, Pintar V, Radunić M, Poljak I. 2021. Phenotypic diversity of almond-leaved pear(Pyrus spinosa Forssk.) along eastern Adriatic coast. Forests, 12 (12):1630. doi: 10.3390/f12121630 URL
[22]	Wang Lirong, Zhu Gengrui, Fang Weichao. 2005. The evaluating criteria of some botanical quantitative characters of peach genetic resources. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 38 (4):770-776. (in Chinese)
	王力荣, 朱更瑞, 方伟超. 2005. 桃种质资源若干植物学数量性状描述指标探讨. 中国农业科学, 38 (4):770-776.
[23]	Wang Shumin, Cao Yongsheng, Redden R J, Hu Jiapeng, Usher T. 2002. The morphological diversity and classification of Adzuki adzuki Bean bean[Vigna angularis(Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi] germplasm resources in China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 28 (6):727-733. (in Chinese)
	王述民, 曹永生, Redden R J, 胡家蓬, Usher T. 2002. 我国小豆种质资源形态多样性鉴定与分类研究. 作物学报, 28 (6):727-733.
[24]	Wang X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wang Z, Qi K, Li H, Tian R, Wu X, Qiao X, Zhang S, Yin H. 2023. Comparative analysis of volatile aromatic compounds from a wide range of pear(Pyrus L.)germplasm resources based on HS-SPME with GC-MS. Food Chemistry,418:135963.
[25]	Wu Jingyi. 2022. Analysis and study on the contents and composition characteristics of sugar and acid in 540 pear germplasm resources[M. D. Dissertation]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	吴静贻. 2022. 540份梨种质资源果实糖、酸含量及组成特性分析研究[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
[26]	Yu P, Jiang S, Wang X, Bai S, Teng Y. 2016. Retrotransposon-based sequence-specific amplification polymorphism markers reveal that cultivated Pyrus ussuriensis originated from an interspecific hybridization. European Journal of Horticultural Science,81:264-272.
[27]	Zhang Bingbing, Song Hongwei, Liu Huitao, Liang Yinghai, Li Yuebo. 2009. Study on the diversity of phenotypic characteristics of pear germplasm resources in the cold region. Journal of Fruit Science, 26 (3):287-293. (in Chinese)
	张冰冰, 宋洪伟, 刘慧涛, 梁英海, 李粤渤. 2009. 寒地梨种质资源表型多样性研究. 果树学报, 26 (3):287-293.
[28]	Zhang Shaoling, Xie Zhihua. 2019. Current status,trends,main problems and the suggestions on development of pear industry in China. Journal of Fruit Science, 36 (8):1067-1072. (in Chinese)
	张绍铃, 谢智华. 2019. 我国梨产业发展现状、趋势、存在问题与对策建议. 果树学报, 36 (8):1067-1072.
[29]	Zhang Ying, Cao Yufen, Huo Hongliang, Tian Luming, Dong Xingguang, Qi Dan, Zhang Xiaoshuang. 2016. Research on diversity of pear germplasm resources based on flowers phenotype traits. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 43 (7):1245-1256. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0936
	张莹, 曹玉芬, 霍宏亮, 田路明, 董星光, 齐丹, 张小双. 2016. 基于花表型性状的梨种质资源多样性研究. 园艺学报, 43 (7):1245-1256. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0936
[30]	Zhang Ying, Cao Yufen, Huo Hongliang, Xu Jiayu, Tian Luming, Dong Xingguang, Qi Dan, Zhang Xiaoshuang, Liu Chao, Wang Lidong. 2018. Diversity of pear germplasm resources based on twig and leaf phenotypic traits. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 51 (17):3353-3369. (in Chinese)
	张莹, 曹玉芬, 霍宏亮, 徐家玉, 田路明, 董星光, 齐丹, 张小双, 刘超, 王立东. 2018. 基于枝条和叶片表型性状的梨种质资源多样性. 中国农业科学, 51 (17):3353-3369. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.17.010
[31]	Zhang Y, Cao Y F, Huo H L, Xu J Y, Tian L M, Dong X G, Qi D, Liu C. 2022. An assessment of the genetic diversity of pear(Pyrus L.) germplasm resources based on the fruit phenotypic traits. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 21 (8):2275-2290. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63885-6 URL

性状 Trait	英文缩写Abbreviation	分级标准 Grading standard
一年生枝颜色Color of one-year-old shoot	COS	1−绿黄色，2−灰褐色，3−黄褐色，4−绿褐色，5−红褐色，6−褐色， 7−紫褐色，8−黑褐色 1−Green yellow，2−Grey brown，3−Yellow brown，4−Green brown，5−Red brown，6−Brown，7−Purple brown，8−Black brown
一年生枝皮孔数量 Number of lenticels one-year-old shoot	NLO	1−无或极少，3−少，5−中，7−多 1−Absent or extremely few，3−Few，5−Medium，7−Many
叶芽姿态 Position of vegetative bud in relation to shoot	PVB	1−贴生，2−斜生，3−离生 1−Adpressed，2−Slightly held out，3−Markedly held out
叶芽顶端特征 Character of apex of vegetative bud	CAV	1−尖，2−钝，3−圆 1−Acute，2−Obtuse，3−Round
芽托大小Size of bud support	SBS	3−小，5−中，7−大 3−Small，5−Medium，7−Large
花芽茸毛Pubescence on flower bud	PFB	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
嫩枝茸毛Pubescence on young shoot	PYS	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
针刺Thorn	T	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
二次花现象Secondary flowering phenomenon	SFP	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
树势Tree vigor	TV	1−旺盛，2−中庸，3−弱 1−Vigorous，2−Moderate，3−Weak
秋梢生长量Number of autumnal shoot	AS	1−无（= 0），2−少（1 ~ 10），3−中（10 ~ 20），4−多（> 20） 1−Absent（= 0），2−Few（1 ~ 10），3−Medium（10 ~ 20），4−Many（> 20）
一年生枝组类型Annual branch type	ABT	1−极短（0 ~ 20 cm），2−短（20 ~ 40 cm），3−中（40 ~ 60 cm）， 4−长（60 ~ 80 cm），5−极长（> 80 cm） 1−Extremely short（0 ~ 20 cm），2−Short（20 ~ 40 cm），3−Medium（40 ~ 60 cm），4−Long（60 ~ 80 cm），5−Extremely long（> 80 cm）
幼叶颜色Color of young leaf	CYL	1−绿色，2−绿微着红色，3−绿着红色，4−红着绿色，5−红微着绿色， 6−红色 1−Green，2−Green tinged with red，3−Green suffused with red，4−Red suffused with green，5−Red tinged with green，6−Red
叶基形状Shape of leaf base	SLB	1−狭楔形，2−楔形，3−宽楔形，4−圆形，5−截形，6−心形 1−Narrow wedge-shaped，2−Wedge-shaped，3−Wide wedge-shaped，4−Round，5−Truncate，6−Cordate
叶片形状Leaf shape	LS	1−圆形，2−卵圆形，3−椭圆形，4−披针形 1−Round，2−Ovate，3−Elliptic，4−Lanceolate
叶尖形状Shape of leaf apex	SLA	1−渐尖，2−钝尖，3−急尖，4−长尾形 1−Gradually acuate，2−Obtuse，3−Sharp-acuate，4−Long-tail acuate
叶缘Leaf margin	LM	1−全缘，2−圆钝锯齿，3−锐锯齿，4−复锯齿 1−Entire，2−Crenate，3−Serrate，4−Biserrate
叶面伸展状态Status of leaf surface	SLS	1−平展，2−抱合，3−反卷，4−波浪 1−Flat，2−Enclasped，3−Back-rolled，4−Wavy
叶姿Latitude of leaf in relation to shoot	LLS	1−斜向上，2−水平，3−斜向下 1−Upwards，2−Outwards，3−Downwards
托叶Presence of stipules	PS	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
刺芒Seta on leaf margin	SLM	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
叶柄着色情况Petiole coloring	PC	0−无红色，1−有红色 0−Without red coloration，1−With red coloration

性状 Trait	英文缩写Abbreviation	分级标准 Grading standard
一年生枝颜色Color of one-year-old shoot	COS	1−绿黄色，2−灰褐色，3−黄褐色，4−绿褐色，5−红褐色，6−褐色， 7−紫褐色，8−黑褐色 1−Green yellow，2−Grey brown，3−Yellow brown，4−Green brown，5−Red brown，6−Brown，7−Purple brown，8−Black brown
一年生枝皮孔数量 Number of lenticels one-year-old shoot	NLO	1−无或极少，3−少，5−中，7−多 1−Absent or extremely few，3−Few，5−Medium，7−Many
叶芽姿态 Position of vegetative bud in relation to shoot	PVB	1−贴生，2−斜生，3−离生 1−Adpressed，2−Slightly held out，3−Markedly held out
叶芽顶端特征 Character of apex of vegetative bud	CAV	1−尖，2−钝，3−圆 1−Acute，2−Obtuse，3−Round
芽托大小Size of bud support	SBS	3−小，5−中，7−大 3−Small，5−Medium，7−Large
花芽茸毛Pubescence on flower bud	PFB	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
嫩枝茸毛Pubescence on young shoot	PYS	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
针刺Thorn	T	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
二次花现象Secondary flowering phenomenon	SFP	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
树势Tree vigor	TV	1−旺盛，2−中庸，3−弱 1−Vigorous，2−Moderate，3−Weak
秋梢生长量Number of autumnal shoot	AS	1−无（= 0），2−少（1 ~ 10），3−中（10 ~ 20），4−多（> 20） 1−Absent（= 0），2−Few（1 ~ 10），3−Medium（10 ~ 20），4−Many（> 20）
一年生枝组类型Annual branch type	ABT	1−极短（0 ~ 20 cm），2−短（20 ~ 40 cm），3−中（40 ~ 60 cm）， 4−长（60 ~ 80 cm），5−极长（> 80 cm） 1−Extremely short（0 ~ 20 cm），2−Short（20 ~ 40 cm），3−Medium（40 ~ 60 cm），4−Long（60 ~ 80 cm），5−Extremely long（> 80 cm）
幼叶颜色Color of young leaf	CYL	1−绿色，2−绿微着红色，3−绿着红色，4−红着绿色，5−红微着绿色， 6−红色 1−Green，2−Green tinged with red，3−Green suffused with red，4−Red suffused with green，5−Red tinged with green，6−Red
叶基形状Shape of leaf base	SLB	1−狭楔形，2−楔形，3−宽楔形，4−圆形，5−截形，6−心形 1−Narrow wedge-shaped，2−Wedge-shaped，3−Wide wedge-shaped，4−Round，5−Truncate，6−Cordate
叶片形状Leaf shape	LS	1−圆形，2−卵圆形，3−椭圆形，4−披针形 1−Round，2−Ovate，3−Elliptic，4−Lanceolate
叶尖形状Shape of leaf apex	SLA	1−渐尖，2−钝尖，3−急尖，4−长尾形 1−Gradually acuate，2−Obtuse，3−Sharp-acuate，4−Long-tail acuate
叶缘Leaf margin	LM	1−全缘，2−圆钝锯齿，3−锐锯齿，4−复锯齿 1−Entire，2−Crenate，3−Serrate，4−Biserrate
叶面伸展状态Status of leaf surface	SLS	1−平展，2−抱合，3−反卷，4−波浪 1−Flat，2−Enclasped，3−Back-rolled，4−Wavy
叶姿Latitude of leaf in relation to shoot	LLS	1−斜向上，2−水平，3−斜向下 1−Upwards，2−Outwards，3−Downwards
托叶Presence of stipules	PS	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
刺芒Seta on leaf margin	SLM	0−无，1−有 0−Absent，1−Present
叶柄着色情况Petiole coloring	PC	0−无红色，1−有红色 0−Without red coloration，1−With red coloration

一年生枝颜色 Color of one-year-old shoot	英国皇家园艺学会比色卡代码 Code in the Royal Horticultural Society’s colour chart
绿黄色Green yellow	199A，199B
灰褐色Grey brown	N200B，N200C
黄褐色Yellow brown	164A，165A，165B，166A，167A，N170A，171A，175A，175B，175C，177A，177B，N199B，N199C，N199D，200D
绿褐色Green brown	N199A
红褐色Red brown	176A，178A，178B，183A，183B
褐色Brown	200B，200C
紫褐色Purple brown	187A，187B
黑褐色Black brown	200A

一年生枝颜色 Color of one-year-old shoot	英国皇家园艺学会比色卡代码 Code in the Royal Horticultural Society’s colour chart
绿黄色Green yellow	199A，199B
灰褐色Grey brown	N200B，N200C
黄褐色Yellow brown	164A，165A，165B，166A，167A，N170A，171A，175A，175B，175C，177A，177B，N199B，N199C，N199D，200D
绿褐色Green brown	N199A
红褐色Red brown	176A，178A，178B，183A，183B
褐色Brown	200B，200C
紫褐色Purple brown	187A，187B
黑褐色Black brown	200A

性状 Trait	最小值 Min.	最大值 Max.	中位数 Median	平均数 ± 标准差 Mean ± SD	变异系数/% CV	多样性指数 H'
叶柄长度/cm Petiole length	2.22	8.19	4.97	4.95 ± 1.18	23.93	2.087
叶片长度/cm Leaf length	6.21	15.37	11.18	10.91 ± 2.17	19.90	2.049
叶片宽度/cm Leaf width	3.38	9.74	6.97	6.73 ± 1.42	21.16	2.055
叶面积/cm² Leaf area	13.43	93.61	51.52	49.47 ± 18.09	36.56	2.038
叶形指数 Leaf-shape index	1.17	2.32	1.62	1.64 ± 0.18	11.18	2.012
一年生枝长度/cm Length of one-year-old shoot	17.50	86.11	47.00	47.60 ± 11.97	25.15	2.066
一年生枝粗度/mm Thickness of one-year-old shoot	3.07	9.51	5.12	5.18 ± 0.88	16.98	2.004
节间长度/cm Length of internode	1.92	5.48	3.95	3.88 ± 0.76	19.68	2.057
花芽长度/mm Length of flower bud	3.40	14.40	9.28	9.10 ± 2.22	24.41	2.075
花芽粗度/mm Thickness of flower bud	2.30	6.46	4.35	4.29 ± 0.79	18.53	2.085

264份梨种质资源枝条、叶片表型多样性评价

Phenotypic Diversity Evaluation of Shoots and Leaves in 264 Pear Germplasm Accessions

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数:

性状 Trait	西洋梨 Pyrus communis （n = 55）	白梨 P. bretschneiderir （n = 49）	砂梨 P. pyrifolia （n = 96）	新疆梨 P. sinkiangensis （n = 5）	秋子梨 P. ussuriensis （n = 27）	均值 Mean
叶柄长度 Petiole length	22.00	18.88	20.17	23.63	25.23	21.98
叶片长度 Leaf length	13.70	16.38	12.63	14.00	15.61	14.46
叶片宽度 Leaf width	16.70	15.58	13.32	9.98	16.43	14.40
叶面积 Leaf area	28.51	28.64	20.89	19.06	31.58	25.74
叶形指数 Leaf-shape index	7.60	8.79	14.49	13.25	10.61	10.95
一年生枝长度 Length of one-year-old shoot	20.67	24.40	25.14	21.16	23.99	23.07
一年生枝粗度 Thickness of one-year-old shoot	9.83	11.00	15.74	9.96	10.28	11.36
节间长度 Length of internode	15.06	8.77	12.93	19.82	10.48	13.41
花芽长度 Length of flower bud	24.00	19.12	15.79	32.62	22.44	22.79
花芽粗度 Thickness of flower bud	16.25	14.14	13.64	10.38	14.62	13.81
均值 Mean	17.43	16.57	16.47	17.39	18.13	—

性状 Trait	方差分量 Variance components				方差分量百分比/% Percentage of variance components			表型分化系数/% Phenotype differentition coefficient (V_ST)
性状 Trait	群体间 Among populations	群体内 Within populations		随机误差 Random errors	群体间 Among populations	群体内 Within populations	随机误差 Random errors	表型分化系数/% Phenotype differentition coefficient (V_ST)
叶柄长度Petiole length	0.47	0.99		2.14	13.09	27.56	59.35	32.21
叶片长度Leaf length	2.77	2.42		1.16	43.58	38.11	18.31	53.35
叶片宽度Leaf width	1.21	0.98		0.58	43.70	35.29	21.01	55.32
叶面积Leaf area	185.56	162.21		89.14	42.47	37.13	20.40	53.36
一年生枝长度 Length of one-year-old shoot	9.32	61.23		513.47	1.60	10.48	87.92	13.21
一年生枝粗度 Thickness of one-year-old shoot	0.29	0.35		0.91	18.64	22.53	58.83	45.27
节间长度Length of internode	0.39	0.19		0.30	45.04	21.23	33.73	67.97
花芽长度Length of flower bud	2.56	2.86		1.28	38.18	42.71	19.11	47.20
花芽粗度Thickness of flower bud	0.28		0.35	0.26	31.37	39.28	29.35	44.40
均值 Mean	—		—	—	30.85	30.48	38.67	45.81

性状 Trait	主成分 Principal components
性状 Trait	1	2	3
叶柄长度 Petiole length	0.84	0.05	0.08
叶片长度 Leaf length	0.82	0.36	0.19
叶片宽度 Leaf width	0.87	0.32	0.18
叶面积 Leaf area	0.89	0.34	0.20
一年生枝长度 Length of one-year-old shoot	0.11	-0.14	0.94
一年生枝粗度 Thickness of one-year-old shoot	0.35	0.44	0.47
节间长度 Length of internode	0.47	0.51	0.51
花芽长度 Length of flower bud	0.20	0.92	0.03
花芽粗度 Thickness of flower bud	0.28	0.91	-0.07
特征值 Eigen value	5.115	1.377	0.900
贡献率/% Contribution rate	56.838	15.301	10.003
累计贡献率/% Cumulative contribution rate	56.838	72.139	82.142

[1]	安俊旭, 李上云, 桂瑞, 郭珈利, 张云婷, 汤浩茹, 张勇. 早熟梨新品种‘蜀都香’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 15-16.
[2]	王伟琪, 李上云, 桂瑞, 汤浩茹, 张勇. 早熟梨杂交新品种‘蜀都早’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 17-18.
[3]	涂俊凡, 李先明, 朱红艳, 张力. 优质梨新品种‘明露’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 19-20.
[4]	张艳杰, 欧春青, 王斐, 马力, 齐力永, 姜淑苓. 优质梨新品种‘华韵’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 21-22.
[5]	欧春青, 王斐, 张艳杰, 马力, 齐力永, 姜淑苓. 优质秋子梨新品种‘华秀’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 23-24.
[6]	马娜, 鲁立庆, 张海奇, 刘春燕, 齐永杰, 徐义流, 肖子文, 李明刚, 朱颖旭, 高正辉. 梨新品种‘皖梨7号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 25-26.
[7]	魏春艳, 蔡丹英, 王月志, 施泽彬, 钟林炳, 戴美松. 砂梨新品种‘钟玉’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 27-28.
[8]	李乐龙, 王然, 宋健坤. 红皮梨新品种‘鲁艳’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 29-30.
[9]	许国春, 许泳清, 李华伟, 纪荣昌, 罗文彬, 林赵淼, 邱思鑫, 汤浩. 马铃薯耐低氮种质资源筛选与氮效率分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(3): 775-790.
[10]	张昌伟, 厉恩铜, 王文龙, 侯喜林. 不结球白菜的起源、进化、研究及产业发展[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(3): 892-918.
[11]	田敏, 董燕梅, 郑涛, 李慧, 夏菲, 王頔, 白红彤, 曾海涛, 石雷. 香根鸢尾种质资源及其挥发性成分研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(2): 437-446.
[12]	卢明艳, 武春昊, 赵滢, 闫兴凯, 李红莲, 丁丽华, 张茂君, 王强. 抗寒抗病晚熟梨新品种‘吉玉’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 13-14.
[13]	张靖国, 陈启亮, 杨晓平, 范净, 杜威, 刘威, 胡红菊. 早熟褐皮砂梨新品种‘金早晶’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 15-16.
[14]	张艳杰, 欧春青, 王斐, 马力, 齐力永, 姜淑苓. 优质晚熟梨新品种‘兴梨二十’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 17-18.
[15]	杨晓平, 陈启亮, 张靖国, 范净, 杜威, 刘威, 胡红菊. 晚熟抗病优质砂梨新品种‘金碧’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 19-20.

264份梨种质资源枝条、叶片表型多样性评价

Phenotypic Diversity Evaluation of Shoots and Leaves in 264 Pear Germplasm Accessions

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数: 当日访问总数: 当前在线人数:

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数: