园艺学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1261-1274.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0387
收稿日期:
2021-12-02
修回日期:
2022-03-09
出版日期:
2022-06-25
发布日期:
2022-07-04
通讯作者:
蒋卫杰
E-mail:jiangweijie@caas.cn
基金资助:
LU Tao, YU Hongjun, LI Qiang, JIANG Weijie()
Received:
2021-12-02
Revised:
2022-03-09
Online:
2022-06-25
Published:
2022-07-04
Contact:
JIANG Weijie
E-mail:jiangweijie@caas.cn
摘要:
通过研究华北地区日光温室番茄秋冬茬椰糠栽培中不同留叶数和留果数对植株生长、叶片光合特性、果实产量和品质等的影响,获得最佳功能叶片和果实保有量,为改善设施番茄生产轻简化技术提供理论依据。以大果型番茄‘粉抗1号’为试验材料,统一留7穗果打顶,从上向下留7、9、11完全展开功能叶和每穗留3果(共21果)和4果(共28果)等共6个处理,对不同冠层叶片光合和呼吸、叶片和果实发育特征、果实品质和产量等进行分析。结果表明,各处理植株株高和茎粗在打顶后无显著差异。留9叶21果和9叶28果处理中部冠层叶片净光合速率(Pn)、光饱和点(LSP)、CO2饱和点(CSP)、表观量子效率(AQE)和羧化效率(CE)显著高于其他处理,而暗呼吸速率(Rd)较低,底部冠层叶片上述参数及叶片叶绿素含量以留7叶21果和7叶28果处理为优。留9叶28果处理单株果实产量、单栽培槽产量显著高于其他处理,果实糖酸比表现稳定且最优。综上,华北地区设施番茄生产中,留7穗打顶,以保留9片功能叶,每果穗上保留4个果实为最佳叶果量调控方式,该技术可以有效改善番茄群体结构,利于光合色素合成和积累,有效增强叶片光合作用,从而提高番茄产量并保持良好品质。
中图分类号:
路涛, 余宏军, 李强, 蒋卫杰. 叶果量调控对番茄生长发育、果实品质和产量的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(6): 1261-1274.
LU Tao, YU Hongjun, LI Qiang, JIANG Weijie. Effects of Leaf and Fruit Quantity Regulation on Growth,Fruit Quality and Yield of Tomato[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6): 1261-1274.
图1 不同叶果量处理对番茄植株生长发育的影响 柱形图上不同小写字母表示处理间在0.05水平差异显著(P < 0.05),下同。
Fig. 1 Effects of different treatments on tomato plant growth characteristics Different lowercase letters on the column chart indicate significant difference among treatments at 0.05 level(P < 0.05). The same below.
留叶果量 Number | 10-15 | 11-16 | 01-07 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
叶 Leaf | 果 Furit | |||
7 | 21 | 49.4 ± 1.3 a | 50.1 ± 1.1 a | 49.5 ± 0.2 a |
28 | 49.3 ± 0.8 a | 50.5 ± 1.0 a | 50.8 ± 1.2 a | |
9 | 21 | 48.6 ± 0.4 a | 50.2 ± 1.1 a | 49.1 ± 3.9 a |
28 | 48.3 ± 0.2 a | 51.0 ± 1.7 a | 50.6 ± 1.4 a | |
11 | 21 | 48.8 ± 2.3 a | 50.4 ± 1.2 a | 49.4 ± 0.6 a |
28 | 48.5 ± 0.3 a | 47.8 ± 1.1 b | 50.8 ± 1.6 a |
表1 番茄植株顶部冠层叶片叶绿素含量(SPAD)变化
Table 1 Variation of chlorophyll content of tomato top canopy leaves
留叶果量 Number | 10-15 | 11-16 | 01-07 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
叶 Leaf | 果 Furit | |||
7 | 21 | 49.4 ± 1.3 a | 50.1 ± 1.1 a | 49.5 ± 0.2 a |
28 | 49.3 ± 0.8 a | 50.5 ± 1.0 a | 50.8 ± 1.2 a | |
9 | 21 | 48.6 ± 0.4 a | 50.2 ± 1.1 a | 49.1 ± 3.9 a |
28 | 48.3 ± 0.2 a | 51.0 ± 1.7 a | 50.6 ± 1.4 a | |
11 | 21 | 48.8 ± 2.3 a | 50.4 ± 1.2 a | 49.4 ± 0.6 a |
28 | 48.5 ± 0.3 a | 47.8 ± 1.1 b | 50.8 ± 1.6 a |
留叶果量Number | 冠层 Canopy | µmol · m-2 · s-1 | µmol · mol-1 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶Leaf | 果Fruit | LSP | LCP | CE | AQE | Rd | Rp | CSP | CCP | |||||
7 | 21 | 顶Top | 2 446 ± 35 b | 27.7 ± 2.3 bc | 0.076 ± 0.015 a | 0.074 ± 0.014 a | 2.1 ± 0.2 cd | 1 335 ± 27 a | 39.2 ± 5.5 g | 3.1 ± 0.2 a | ||||
中Mid | 2 260 ± 26 d | 22.4 ± 1.6 de | 0.068 ± 0.011 b | 0.079 ± 0.013 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 de | 1 131 ± 32 d | 44.3 ± 4.1 ef | 2.8 ± 0.2 a | ||||||
底Bot | 1 387 ± 20 i | 16.1 ± 2.1 fg | 0.060 ± 0.009 b | 0.074 ± 0.015 a | 1.7 ± 0.2 d | 1 030 ± 24 ef | 48.9 ± 5.0 de | 2.7 ± 0.1 ab | ||||||
28 | 顶Top | 2 438 ± 33 b | 30.2 ± 1.5 ab | 0.079 ± 0.012 a | 0.071 ± 0.011 a | 2.9 ± 0.3 b | 1 190 ± 21 c | 43.6 ± 4.4 ef | 2.8 ± 0.1 a | |||||
中Mid | 2 289 ± 27 cd | 25.6 ± 3.1 cd | 0.065 ± 0.008 b | 0.079 ± 0.009 a | 2.5 ± 0.2 b | 1 126 ± 23 d | 49.6 ± 3.9 de | 2.8 ± 0.2 a | ||||||
底Bot | 1 424 ± 16 i | 23.9 ± 2.1 de | 0.059 ± 0.012 b | 0.071 ± 0.013 a | 1.6 ± 0.2 d | 1 123 ± 20 d | 53.4 ± 5.2 cd | 2.6 ± 0.1 b | ||||||
9 | 21 | 顶Top | 2 500 ± 22 ab | 31.3 ± 2.4 ab | 0.074 ± 0.011 ab | 0.071 ± 0.014 a | 2.3 ± 0.3 c | 1 262 ± 16 b | 39.1 ± 3.3 g | 2.7 ± 0.2 ab | ||||
中Mid | 2 342 ± 27 c | 26.1 ± 1.8 bcd | 0.068 ± 0.013 b | 0.075 ± 0.008 a | 1.4 ± 0.1 ef | 1 129 ± 33 d | 42.2 ± 3.9 fg | 2.0 ± 0.1 cd | ||||||
底Bot | 1 607 ± 24 h | 12.0 ± 0.9 g | 0.043 ± 0.005 c | 0.062 ± 0.006 b | 1.1 ± 0.1 f | 1 044 ± 30ef | 50.7 ± 4.8 d | 2.0 ± 0.2 cd | ||||||
28 | 顶Top | 2 555 ± 37 a | 34.1 ± 3.8 a | 0.077 ± 0.016 a | 0.069 ± 0.005 a | 3.0 ± 0.3 b | 1 248 ± 25 b | 42.0 ± 4.1 fg | 2.8 ± 0.1 a | |||||
中Mid | 2 439 ± 20 b | 28.8 ± 2.1 b | 0.067 ± 0.013 b | 0.079 ± 0.007 a | 1.5 ± 0.2 d | 1 129 ± 23 d | 50.6 ± 5.4 d | 2.3 ± 0.2 bc | ||||||
底Bot | 1 878 ± 24 f | 14.5 ± 1.7 g | 0.048 ± 0.00 9c | 0.066 ± 0.010 ab | 1.2 ± 0.1 f | 1 105 ± 33de | 55.7 ± 5.2 c | 2.2 ± 0.1 c | ||||||
11 | 21 | 顶Top | 2 539 ± 32 a | 19.8 ± 1.1 ef | 0.068 ± 0.010 b | 0.076 ± 0.011 a | 2.5 ± 0.2 b | 1 145 ± 19 d | 42.6 ± 3.9 fg | 2.6 ± 0.1 b | ||||
中Mid | 1 830 ± 19 f | 15.7 ± 1.9 g | 0.040 ± 0.007 c | 0.079 ± 0.015 a | 1.6 ± 0.1 d | 1 052 ± 27 e | 50.1 ± 4.5 d | 1.8 ± 0.1 de | ||||||
底Bot | 731 ± 16 g | 4.3 ± 0.4 h | 0.026 ± 0.005 d | 0.020 ± 0.007 d | 0.5 ± 0.1 g | 886 ± 21 g | 69.7 ± 5.6 b | 1.6 ± 0.2 e | ||||||
28 | 顶Top | 2 585 ± 40 a | 21.0 ± 1.7 de | 0.068 ± 0.013 b | 0.068 ± 0.009 ab | 3.5 ± 0.3 a | 1 171 ± 33 cd | 48.6 ± 4.4 de | 2.7 ± 0.2 ab | |||||
中Mid | 1 986 ± 30 e | 16.5 ± 1.6 fg | 0.037 ± 0.005 cd | 0.078 ± 0.018 a | 2.2 ± 0.2 bc | 1 055 ± 18 e | 58.8 ± 5.8 bc | 1.9 ± 0.1 de | ||||||
底Bot | 955 ± 17 g | 5.4 ± 0.7 h | 0.021 ± 0.002 d | 0.036 ± 0.003 c | 0.3 ± 0.1g | 981 ± 24 fg | 79.6 ± 6.4 a | 1.3 ± 0.1 f |
表2 番茄植株不同冠层叶片光合作用对光照和CO2响应曲线的主要特征参数
Table 2 The main characteristic parameters of net photosynthesis rate response curves to light and CO2 in different canopy leaves of tomato plant
留叶果量Number | 冠层 Canopy | µmol · m-2 · s-1 | µmol · mol-1 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶Leaf | 果Fruit | LSP | LCP | CE | AQE | Rd | Rp | CSP | CCP | |||||
7 | 21 | 顶Top | 2 446 ± 35 b | 27.7 ± 2.3 bc | 0.076 ± 0.015 a | 0.074 ± 0.014 a | 2.1 ± 0.2 cd | 1 335 ± 27 a | 39.2 ± 5.5 g | 3.1 ± 0.2 a | ||||
中Mid | 2 260 ± 26 d | 22.4 ± 1.6 de | 0.068 ± 0.011 b | 0.079 ± 0.013 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 de | 1 131 ± 32 d | 44.3 ± 4.1 ef | 2.8 ± 0.2 a | ||||||
底Bot | 1 387 ± 20 i | 16.1 ± 2.1 fg | 0.060 ± 0.009 b | 0.074 ± 0.015 a | 1.7 ± 0.2 d | 1 030 ± 24 ef | 48.9 ± 5.0 de | 2.7 ± 0.1 ab | ||||||
28 | 顶Top | 2 438 ± 33 b | 30.2 ± 1.5 ab | 0.079 ± 0.012 a | 0.071 ± 0.011 a | 2.9 ± 0.3 b | 1 190 ± 21 c | 43.6 ± 4.4 ef | 2.8 ± 0.1 a | |||||
中Mid | 2 289 ± 27 cd | 25.6 ± 3.1 cd | 0.065 ± 0.008 b | 0.079 ± 0.009 a | 2.5 ± 0.2 b | 1 126 ± 23 d | 49.6 ± 3.9 de | 2.8 ± 0.2 a | ||||||
底Bot | 1 424 ± 16 i | 23.9 ± 2.1 de | 0.059 ± 0.012 b | 0.071 ± 0.013 a | 1.6 ± 0.2 d | 1 123 ± 20 d | 53.4 ± 5.2 cd | 2.6 ± 0.1 b | ||||||
9 | 21 | 顶Top | 2 500 ± 22 ab | 31.3 ± 2.4 ab | 0.074 ± 0.011 ab | 0.071 ± 0.014 a | 2.3 ± 0.3 c | 1 262 ± 16 b | 39.1 ± 3.3 g | 2.7 ± 0.2 ab | ||||
中Mid | 2 342 ± 27 c | 26.1 ± 1.8 bcd | 0.068 ± 0.013 b | 0.075 ± 0.008 a | 1.4 ± 0.1 ef | 1 129 ± 33 d | 42.2 ± 3.9 fg | 2.0 ± 0.1 cd | ||||||
底Bot | 1 607 ± 24 h | 12.0 ± 0.9 g | 0.043 ± 0.005 c | 0.062 ± 0.006 b | 1.1 ± 0.1 f | 1 044 ± 30ef | 50.7 ± 4.8 d | 2.0 ± 0.2 cd | ||||||
28 | 顶Top | 2 555 ± 37 a | 34.1 ± 3.8 a | 0.077 ± 0.016 a | 0.069 ± 0.005 a | 3.0 ± 0.3 b | 1 248 ± 25 b | 42.0 ± 4.1 fg | 2.8 ± 0.1 a | |||||
中Mid | 2 439 ± 20 b | 28.8 ± 2.1 b | 0.067 ± 0.013 b | 0.079 ± 0.007 a | 1.5 ± 0.2 d | 1 129 ± 23 d | 50.6 ± 5.4 d | 2.3 ± 0.2 bc | ||||||
底Bot | 1 878 ± 24 f | 14.5 ± 1.7 g | 0.048 ± 0.00 9c | 0.066 ± 0.010 ab | 1.2 ± 0.1 f | 1 105 ± 33de | 55.7 ± 5.2 c | 2.2 ± 0.1 c | ||||||
11 | 21 | 顶Top | 2 539 ± 32 a | 19.8 ± 1.1 ef | 0.068 ± 0.010 b | 0.076 ± 0.011 a | 2.5 ± 0.2 b | 1 145 ± 19 d | 42.6 ± 3.9 fg | 2.6 ± 0.1 b | ||||
中Mid | 1 830 ± 19 f | 15.7 ± 1.9 g | 0.040 ± 0.007 c | 0.079 ± 0.015 a | 1.6 ± 0.1 d | 1 052 ± 27 e | 50.1 ± 4.5 d | 1.8 ± 0.1 de | ||||||
底Bot | 731 ± 16 g | 4.3 ± 0.4 h | 0.026 ± 0.005 d | 0.020 ± 0.007 d | 0.5 ± 0.1 g | 886 ± 21 g | 69.7 ± 5.6 b | 1.6 ± 0.2 e | ||||||
28 | 顶Top | 2 585 ± 40 a | 21.0 ± 1.7 de | 0.068 ± 0.013 b | 0.068 ± 0.009 ab | 3.5 ± 0.3 a | 1 171 ± 33 cd | 48.6 ± 4.4 de | 2.7 ± 0.2 ab | |||||
中Mid | 1 986 ± 30 e | 16.5 ± 1.6 fg | 0.037 ± 0.005 cd | 0.078 ± 0.018 a | 2.2 ± 0.2 bc | 1 055 ± 18 e | 58.8 ± 5.8 bc | 1.9 ± 0.1 de | ||||||
底Bot | 955 ± 17 g | 5.4 ± 0.7 h | 0.021 ± 0.002 d | 0.036 ± 0.003 c | 0.3 ± 0.1g | 981 ± 24 fg | 79.6 ± 6.4 a | 1.3 ± 0.1 f |
留叶果量 Number | 01-22 | 02-02 | 02-10 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶Leaf | 果 Fruit | 总可溶固形物 Total solids content | 总酸 Total acid | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 总可溶固形物 Total solids content | 总酸 Total acid | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 总可溶固形物 Total solids content | 总酸 Total acid | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | ||
7 | 21 | 4.39 ± 0.17 a | 1.10 ± 0.07 a | 3.85 ± 0.26 b | 3.72 ± 0.13 c | 1.39 ± 0.12 a | 3.34 ± 0.22 ab | 3.50 ± 0.16 c | 1.08 ± 0.01 c | 3.24 ± 0.22 b | ||
28 | 4.04 ± 0.14 ab | 1.11 ± 0.06 a | 3.79 ± 0.21 b | 3.98 ± 0.17 bc | 1.13 ± 0.09 bc | 3.75 ± 0.22 a | 3.90 ± 0.14 b | 1.02 ± 0.07 c | 3.83 ± 0.31 a | |||
9 | 21 | 4.14 ± 0.11 ab | 0.98 ± 0.07 b | 4.51 ± 0.31 a | 4.12 ± 0.16 b | 1.11 ± 0.05 bc | 3.09 ± 0.19 b | 4.00 ± 0.14 b | 1.44 ± 0.12 a | 2.96 ± 0.36 b | ||
28 | 4.08 ± 0.13 ab | 1.01 ± 0.08 b | 4.08 ± 0.34 a | 4.19 ± 0.18 b | 1.08 ± 0.07 c | 3.75 ± 0.11 a | 4.13 ± 0.10 a | 1.16 ± 0.06 c | 3.60 ± 0.28 a | |||
11 | 21 | 4.22 ± 0.15 ab | 1.11 ± 0.07 a | 3.70 ± 0.21 b | 4.05 ± 0.14 b | 1.27 ± 0.04 ab | 3.21 ± 0.18 b | 3.90 ± 0.13 b | 1.19 ± 0.02 c | 3.28 ± 0.10 b | ||
28 | 3.81 ± 0.10 b | 1.06 ± 0.05 a | 3.65 ± 0.21 b | 4.38 ± 0.14 a | 1.30 ± 0.04 a | 3.43 ± 0.23 ab | 4.40 ± 0.19 a | 1.39 ± 0.03 b | 3.22 ± 0.15 b |
表3 不同处理对番茄果实品质的影响
Table 3 Effects of different treatments on the qualities of tomato fruit
留叶果量 Number | 01-22 | 02-02 | 02-10 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶Leaf | 果 Fruit | 总可溶固形物 Total solids content | 总酸 Total acid | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 总可溶固形物 Total solids content | 总酸 Total acid | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 总可溶固形物 Total solids content | 总酸 Total acid | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | ||
7 | 21 | 4.39 ± 0.17 a | 1.10 ± 0.07 a | 3.85 ± 0.26 b | 3.72 ± 0.13 c | 1.39 ± 0.12 a | 3.34 ± 0.22 ab | 3.50 ± 0.16 c | 1.08 ± 0.01 c | 3.24 ± 0.22 b | ||
28 | 4.04 ± 0.14 ab | 1.11 ± 0.06 a | 3.79 ± 0.21 b | 3.98 ± 0.17 bc | 1.13 ± 0.09 bc | 3.75 ± 0.22 a | 3.90 ± 0.14 b | 1.02 ± 0.07 c | 3.83 ± 0.31 a | |||
9 | 21 | 4.14 ± 0.11 ab | 0.98 ± 0.07 b | 4.51 ± 0.31 a | 4.12 ± 0.16 b | 1.11 ± 0.05 bc | 3.09 ± 0.19 b | 4.00 ± 0.14 b | 1.44 ± 0.12 a | 2.96 ± 0.36 b | ||
28 | 4.08 ± 0.13 ab | 1.01 ± 0.08 b | 4.08 ± 0.34 a | 4.19 ± 0.18 b | 1.08 ± 0.07 c | 3.75 ± 0.11 a | 4.13 ± 0.10 a | 1.16 ± 0.06 c | 3.60 ± 0.28 a | |||
11 | 21 | 4.22 ± 0.15 ab | 1.11 ± 0.07 a | 3.70 ± 0.21 b | 4.05 ± 0.14 b | 1.27 ± 0.04 ab | 3.21 ± 0.18 b | 3.90 ± 0.13 b | 1.19 ± 0.02 c | 3.28 ± 0.10 b | ||
28 | 3.81 ± 0.10 b | 1.06 ± 0.05 a | 3.65 ± 0.21 b | 4.38 ± 0.14 a | 1.30 ± 0.04 a | 3.43 ± 0.23 ab | 4.40 ± 0.19 a | 1.39 ± 0.03 b | 3.22 ± 0.15 b |
留叶果量 Number | 单株产量/kg Single plant yield | 单果质量/g Single fruit weight | 单穗果质量/kg Single ear fruit weight | 单栽培槽产量/kg Single trough yield | 单位面积产量/ (kg · m-2) Per unit yield | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶Leaf | 果 Fruit | |||||
7 | 21 | 3.50 ± 0.10 c | 169.38 ± 2.54 ab | 0.51 ± 0.01 b | 91.12 ± 2.44 d | 22.22 ± 0.55 c |
28 | 3.96 ± 0.04 bc | 141.08 ± 18.34 b | 0.57 ± 0.08 b | 102.72 ± 3.13 bc | 26.32 ± 0.23 bc | |
9 | 21 | 4.01 ± 0.05 bc | 210.20 ± 26.89 a | 0.64 ± 0.08 ab | 96.86 ± 2.58 c | 23.59 ± 0.29 bc |
28 | 4.64 ± 0.04 a | 193.31 ± 13.30 a | 0.78 ± 0.05 a | 120.70 ± 3.15 a | 30.18 ± 0.22 a | |
11 | 21 | 3.84 ± 0.19 bc | 177.72 ± 19.19 ab | 0.54 ± 0.06 b | 99.90 ± 2.96 bc | 24.98 ± 1.03 bc |
28 | 4.10 ± 0.07 b | 165.53 ± 23.71 ab | 0.67 ± 0.10 ab | 106.76 ± 2.81 b | 26.69 ± 0.37 b |
表4 不同处理对番茄果实产量的影响
Table 4 Effects of different treatments on the yields of tomato fruit
留叶果量 Number | 单株产量/kg Single plant yield | 单果质量/g Single fruit weight | 单穗果质量/kg Single ear fruit weight | 单栽培槽产量/kg Single trough yield | 单位面积产量/ (kg · m-2) Per unit yield | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶Leaf | 果 Fruit | |||||
7 | 21 | 3.50 ± 0.10 c | 169.38 ± 2.54 ab | 0.51 ± 0.01 b | 91.12 ± 2.44 d | 22.22 ± 0.55 c |
28 | 3.96 ± 0.04 bc | 141.08 ± 18.34 b | 0.57 ± 0.08 b | 102.72 ± 3.13 bc | 26.32 ± 0.23 bc | |
9 | 21 | 4.01 ± 0.05 bc | 210.20 ± 26.89 a | 0.64 ± 0.08 ab | 96.86 ± 2.58 c | 23.59 ± 0.29 bc |
28 | 4.64 ± 0.04 a | 193.31 ± 13.30 a | 0.78 ± 0.05 a | 120.70 ± 3.15 a | 30.18 ± 0.22 a | |
11 | 21 | 3.84 ± 0.19 bc | 177.72 ± 19.19 ab | 0.54 ± 0.06 b | 99.90 ± 2.96 bc | 24.98 ± 1.03 bc |
28 | 4.10 ± 0.07 b | 165.53 ± 23.71 ab | 0.67 ± 0.10 ab | 106.76 ± 2.81 b | 26.69 ± 0.37 b |
[1] |
Ahlman Linnéa, Bånkestad Daniel, Wik T. 2019. Relation between changes in photosynthetic rate and changes in canopy level chlorophyll fluorescence generated by light excitation of different led colours in various background light. Remote Sensing, 11 (4):523-535.
doi: 10.3390/rs11050523 URL |
[2] | Bhosale A M, Harimohan S M, Syed S J. 2018. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on vegetative growth,and reproductive growth parameters of sapota(Manilkara achras Forsberg). International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6 (4):1690-1695. |
[3] | Chen Nian-lai, Wang Gang, Tao Yong-hong. 2003. Dynamics of leaf system in muskmelon. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 23 (4):615-621. (in Chinese) |
陈年来, 王刚, 陶永红. 2003. 甜瓜叶系统发育动态研究. 西北植物学报, 23 (4):615-621. | |
[4] | Chen Xiao-ying, Xu Jian, Liu Hui, Zhu Zhu-jun, Xu Zhi-hao. 2005. Effects of re-growth pruning of over-winter cultivated tomato plants on yield and nutrient uptake. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 17 (1):35-38. (in Chinese) |
陈小影, 徐坚, 刘辉, 朱祝军, 徐志豪. 2005. 越冬栽培番茄再生整枝对产量和养分吸收的影响. 浙江农业学报, 17 (1):35-38. | |
[5] | Chen Zhan-yu. Effects of source-sink alteration on diurnal changes of photosynthesis and mass production in leaves of Panax ginseng[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Jilin:Jilin Agricultural University. (in Chinese) |
陈展宇. 2004. 调控源—库关系对人参叶片光合作用及物质生产日变化的影响[博士论文]. 吉林: 吉林农业大学. | |
[6] | Fang G, Van I M K, Antoine C. 2018. Intercropping with wheat lowers nutrient uptake and biomass accumulation of maize,but increases photosynthetic rate of the ear leaf. Aob Plants, 11 (1):1-30. |
[7] | Heuvelink E. 1996. Tomato growth and yield:quantitative analysis and synthesis[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Wageningen:Wageningen University. |
[8] |
Jiang C, Johkan M, Hohjo M. 2017. Photosynthesis,plant growth,and fruit production of single-truss tomato improves with supplemental lighting provided from underneath or within the inner canopy. Scientia Horticulturae, 222 (14):221-229.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.04.026 URL |
[9] | Jin Wei-ping, Shao Yang-feng, He Yong. 2012. Effects of shoot prunning on photosynthetic characteristics and dry mass distribution in moutainous eggplant. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 24 (4):589-592. (in Chinese) |
金伟萍, 邵泱峰, 何勇. 2012. 剪枝对山地茄子光合特性及同化物分配的影响. 浙江农业学报, 24 (4):589-592. | |
[10] |
Kashem M A, Sarker A, Hossain I. 2015. Comparison of the effect of vermi compost and inorganic fertilizers on vegetative growth and fruit production of tomato(Solanum lycopersicum L.). Open Journal of Soil Science, 5 (2):53-58.
doi: 10.4236/ojss.2015.52006 URL |
[11] | Li Wei, Sui Xiao-lei, Wang Shao-hui, Guan Qiu-zhu, Hu Li-ping, Zhou Ming, Meng Fan-zhen, Zhang Zhen-xian. 2008. Effects of low light on photosynthetic characteristics of different position leaves of cucumber seedlings. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 41 (11):3698-3707. (in Chinese) |
李伟, 眭晓蕾, 王绍辉, 关秋竹, 胡丽萍, 周明, 孟凡珍, 张振贤. 2008. 黄瓜幼苗不同叶位叶片光合特性对弱光的响应. 中国农业科学, 41 (11):3698-3707. | |
[12] | Li Wen-jia, Li Jian-she, Gao Yan-ming, Pu Yan-yan. 2010. Experimental study on tomato high density and early maturing culture in solar greenhouse of Ningxia. Northern Horticulture, 15 (2):62-64. (in Chinese) |
李文甲, 李建设, 高艳明, 卜燕燕. 2010. 宁夏日光温室番茄高密度早熟栽培研究. 北方园艺, 15 (2):62-64. | |
[13] | Li Xin-min, Xu Zhong-ren, Du Wei-guang, Hu Li-cheng. 1991. Study on source sink relationship of sub limited soybean. Soybean Science, 10 (4):269-276. (in Chinese) |
李新民, 许忠仁, 杜维广, 胡立成. 1991. 亚有限大豆源库关系的研究. 大豆科学, 10 (4):269-276. | |
[14] | Li Yang-dan, Lu Zhi-quan, Bai Xiao-li, Yu Xi-hong, Jiang Xin-mei. 2018. Effects of different cultivation density and spike number on yield and quality of greenhouse tomato in early spring. Northern Horticulture, 136 (11):111-119. (in Chinese) |
李扬丹, 卢志权, 白晓丽, 于锡宏, 蒋欣梅. 2018. 不同种植密度和留果穗数对早春大棚番茄产量和品质的影响. 北方园艺, 136 (11):111-119. | |
[15] | Li Yong, Han Hai-rong, Kang Feng-feng, Cheng Xiao-qin, Liu Ke, Zhou Bin, Song Ya-li. 2013. Spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic characterisitics of pinus tabulaeformis canopy. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 21 (2):165-175. (in Chinese) |
李勇, 韩海荣, 康峰峰, 程小琴, 刘可, 周彬, 宋娅丽. 2013. 油松人工林冠层光合生理特性的空间异质性. 东北林业大学学报, 21 (2):165-175. | |
[16] | Li Yue-yang, Su Tie, Wang Yin, Ren Xiao-ping, Han Hui-hui, Zhang Tian-zhu. 2020. Protected horticulture comparison between Netherlands and China. China Vegetables, 376 (6):17-21. (in Chinese) |
李跃洋, 苏铁, 王胤, 任晓平, 韩会会, 张天柱. 2020. 中国与荷兰设施园艺对比分析. 中国蔬菜, 376 (6):17-21. | |
[17] | Lin Lu, Li Zhiqiang, Yu Lu, Wang Hongning, Niu Zimian. 2020. Photosynthetic responses to interaction of light intensity and CO2 concentration and photoinhibition characteristics of two apple canopy shapes. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (11):2073-2085. (in Chinese) |
林琭, 李志强, 蔚露, 王红宁, 牛自勉. 2020. 苹果两种树形叶片对光强和CO2浓度互作的光合响应及光抑制特性. 园艺学报, 47 (11):2073-2085. | |
[18] | Lu T, Meng Z J, Zhang G X, Qi M F, Sun Z P, Liu Y F, Li T L. 2017. Sub-high temperature and high light intensity induced irreversible inhibition on photosynthesis system of tomato plant(Solanum lycopersicum L.). Front Plant Sci, 8 (7):1-28. |
[19] |
Lu T, Yu H J, Li Q, Chai L, Jiang W J. 2019. Improving plant growth and alleviating photosynthetic inhibition and oxidative stress from low-light stress with exogenous GR24 in tomato(Solanum lycopersicum L.)seedlings. Front Plant Sci, 10 (22):1-25.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00001 URL |
[20] | Lu Tao. 2016. The response mechanisms of photoinhibition and photoprotection in tomato(Solaunm lycopersicum L.)leaves to sub-high temperature and high light intensity stress[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Shenyang:Shenyang Agricultural University. (in Chinese) |
路涛. 2016. 亚高温强光胁迫下番茄幼苗光抑制及光保护机制研究[博士论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学. | |
[21] |
Matsuda R, Suzuki K, Nakano A, Higashide T, Takaichi M. 2011. Responses of leaf photosynthesis and plant growth to altered source-sink balance in a Japanese and a Dutch tomato cultivar. Sci Hortic, 127 (22):520-527.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.008 URL |
[22] | Mu Mei-cai, Wen Jin-xiang, Zhang Yue-qiu, Kong Fan-ke, Han Shou-liang, Shan Yu-shan. 2004. The analysis on the source-translocation-sink situation of superhigh-yield winter wheat in theory. Journal of Qingdao Agicultural University, 21 (1):49-52. (in Chinese) |
慕美财, 温金祥, 张曰秋, 孔凡克, 韩守良, 单玉珊. 2004. 超高产麦田的源流库理论分析. 青岛农业大学学报, 21 (1):49-52. | |
[23] | Qi Zhenyu, Wang Ting, Sang Kangqi, Liu Yue, Wang Mingqin, Yu Jingquan, Zhou Yanhong, Xia Xiaojian. 2021. Effects of supplemental lighting at different positions on tomato plant morphology,photosynthesis and endogenous hormone biosynthesis under low-light environment. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 48 (8):1504-1516. (in Chinese) |
齐振宇, 王婷, 桑康琪, 刘玥, 王明钦, 喻景权, 周艳虹, 夏晓剑. 2021. 设施番茄不同叶位补光对植株形态、光合及激素合成的影响. 园艺学报, 48 (8):1504-1516. | |
[24] | Quan Bao-quan, Bai Dong-mei, Tian Yue-xia, Xue Yun-yun. 2018. Effects of different leaf-peg ratio on photosynthesis and yield of peanut. Journal of Crops, 185 (4):108-111. (in Chinese) |
权宝全, 白冬梅, 田跃霞, 薛云云. 2018. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 185 (4):108-111. | |
[25] | Ren Yue, Luo Xin-lan, Li Tian-lai, Fu Te, Xue Jun-hua, Gu Ji-guang. 2007. Effect of temperature on expansion of tomato leaf area in greenhouse. Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 11 (9):2610-2612. (in Chinese) |
任乐, 罗新兰, 李天来, 符特, 薛俊华, 顾继光. 2007. 日光温室温度对番茄叶面积扩展的影响. 安徽农业科学, 11 (9):2610-2612. | |
[26] | Sun Hong-chun, Li Cun-dong, Lu Wen-jing. 2008. Effects of source/sink ratio on boll weight and physiological activities of leaves at middle and lower fruiting branches in cotton. The Crop Journal, 34 (8):1459-1459. (in Chinese) |
孙红春, 李存东, 路文静. 2008. 棉花源库比对中、下部果枝叶生理活性及铃重的影响. 作物学报, 34 (8):1459-1459. | |
[27] | Wang Yu-mei, Xin Ning, Jin Xi-jie. 2006. Problems of tomato pruning in greenhouse. Jilin Vegetables, 30 (2):31-33. (in Chinese) |
王玉梅, 辛宁, 金希婕. 2006. 温室番茄整枝应注意的问题. 吉林蔬菜, 30 (2):31-33. | |
[28] | Xiao Shen-gen, Zhou Pu-hua, Heuvelink, Liu Zhi-min. 2006. Simulation analysis of the effects of dry matter production and partitioning in greenhouse tomato synchronous leaf pruning. Agricultural Sciences in China, 39 (10):2154-2158. (in Chinese) |
肖深根, 周朴华, Heuvelink, 刘志敏. 2006. 温室番茄同步叶片修剪对干物质生产和分配影响的模拟分析. 中国农业科学, 39 (10):2154-2158. | |
[29] | Xu Yi, Li Xin-xu, Yang Zhe, Li Hong-ling, Gao Li-hong. 2020. Analysis of the reasons for the yield gap of tomato cultivated in multi span glass greenhouse between China and Holland. China Vegetables, 20 (10):1-8. (in Chinese) |
许艺, 李新旭, 杨哲, 李红岺, 高丽红. 2020. 我国连栋玻璃温室番茄长季节栽培产量与荷兰存在差距的原因分析. 中国蔬菜, 20 (10):1-8. | |
[30] | Yang Guo-dong, Zhou Bao-li, Fu Ya-wen, Zhang En-ping, Li Mo. 2004. Photosynthetic characteristics,dry matter distribution pattern and their effects on eggplant yield in different canopy structures. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 31 (5):603-606. (in Chinese) |
杨国栋, 周宝利, 付亚文, 张恩平, 李沫. 2004. 茄子不同群体结构光合特性、干物质分配及其对产量的影响. 园艺学报, 31 (5):603-606. | |
[31] | Yang Rong-chang. 1991. The volume of tomato fruit was estimated by its longitudinal and transverse diameter. China Vegetables,(1):25-30. (in Chinese) |
杨荣昌. 1991. 以番茄果实的纵横径估计其体积大小. 中国蔬菜,(1):25-30. | |
[32] | Ye Zi-piao, Hu Wen-hai, Yan Xiao-hong, Duan Shi-hua. 2016. Photosynthetic characteristics of different plant species based on a mechanistic model of light-response of photosynthesis. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 35 (9):2544-2552. (in Chinese) |
叶子飘, 胡文海, 闫小红, 段世华. 2016. 基于光响应机理模型的不同植物光合特性. 生态学杂志, 35 (9):2544-2552. | |
[33] | Zhang Zhi-jun, Zhang Jian-xin. 2000. Analysis on the relationship between high yield population and its source sink balance in maize. Agriculture and Technology, 20 (6):14-16. (in Chinese) |
张志军, 张建新. 2000. 玉米高产群体与其源库平衡关系的分析. 农业与技术, 20 (6):14-16. | |
[34] | Zhang Zhi-peng, Li Tian, Hou Lei-ping, Sun Sheng, Xing Guo-ming. 2019. Effects of CO2 enrichment on photosynthetic fluorescence of thin-skinned melon in greenhouse during vine elongation. Acta agriculturae boreali-sinica, 34 (6):97-103. (in Chinese) |
张志鹏, 李甜, 侯雷平, 孙胜, 邢国明. 2019. CO2加富对甜瓜光合荧光的影响. 华北农学报, 34 (6):97-103. | |
[35] | Zhao Shi-jie, Liu Hua-shan, Dong Xin-chun. 1998. Experimental guidance of plant physiology. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press. (in Chinese) |
赵世杰, 刘华山, 董新纯. 1998. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社. | |
[36] | Zhao Tong-min, Yu Wen-gui, Yang Ma-li, Zhao Li-ping. 2010. Genetic analysis of soluble solid content using mixed major gene plus polygenes inheritance model in tomato. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26 (3):572-576. (in Chinese) |
赵统敏, 余文贵, 杨玛丽, 赵丽萍. 2010. 番茄可溶性固形物含量的主基因 + 多基因遗传分析. 江苏农业学报, 26 (3):572-576. | |
[37] | Zhou Huai-bing, Jiang Fang-ling, Hu Gen-jin, Xu Wei-sheng, Wang Dong, Wu Zhen. 2013. Effects of planting density and remaining fruit cluster per plant on growth,yield and quality of large fruit tomato varieties in plastic greenhouse in spring. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29 (3):626-632. (in Chinese) |
周怀兵, 蒋芳玲, 胡根金, 徐为圣, 王东, 吴震. 2013. 定植密度和单株留果穗数对春季大棚大果型番茄植株生长及产量和品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 29 (3):626-632. | |
[38] | Zhu Jin-yu, Wen Xiang-zhen, Liu Mei-qin, Li Ya-ling. 2007. Tomato dry matter production and distribution on different crops in solar greenhouse. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 34 (6):1437-1442. (in Chinese) |
朱晋宇, 温祥珍, 刘美琴, 李亚灵. 2007. 不同茬口日光温室番茄干物质生产与分配. 园艺学报, 34 (6):1437-1442. |
[1] | 孙瑞祥, 杨树德, 杨鹏, 韩建东, 宫志远. 豆秸、棉籽粕等栽培基质对金针菇生长和品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 91-102. |
[2] | 刘照霞, 张鑫, 王璐, 马玉婷, 陈倩, 朱占玲, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 肥料穴施位点对苹果细根生长、15N吸收利用及产量品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(7): 1545-1556. |
[3] | 李黎, 冯丹丹, 潘慧, 李文艺, 邓蕾, 汪祖鹏, 钟彩虹. 猕猴桃花粉灭菌方法比较及对果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 769-777. |
[4] | 崔东禹, 李长青, 孙焱鑫, 王激清, 邹国元, 杨俊刚. 温室番茄东西向栽培条件下矮化密植对其生长和产量的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 875-884. |
[5] | 王宏, 杨王莉, 蔺经, 杨青松, 李晓刚, 盛宝龙, 常有宏. 早熟砂梨‘苏翠1号’与其亲本‘翠冠’‘华酥’成熟果实差异代谢产物及差异基因比较分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(3): 493-508. |
[6] | 刘文欢, 邱芳颖, 王娅, 陈朗, 马岩岩, 吕强, 易时来, 谢让金, 郑永强. 枯草芽孢杆菌液态肥对柑橘养分吸收和果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(3): 509-518. |
[7] | 曾译可, 石莹, 陈思怡, 李国敬, 黄先彪, 谢宗周, 李春龙, 郭大勇, 刘继红. 地面覆膜提升椪柑果实品质的效果和可能机制探究[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(11): 2419-2430. |
[8] | 孙嘉茂, 崔全石, 王语晴, 司雅静, 时瑀繁, 卜海东, 袁晖, 王爱德. 苹果采前喷施EBR与MeJA对采后品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(10): 2236-2248. |
[9] | 周铁, 潘斌, 李菲菲, 马小川, 汤孟婧, 廉雪菲, 常媛媛, 陈岳文, 卢晓鹏. 膨大期干旱对温州蜜柑品质形成的影响及复水后树体水分吸收转运规律[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(1): 11-22. |
[10] | 戚行江, 郑锡良, 李小白, 张淑文, 任海英, 俞浙萍. 不同颜色避雨膜形成的光质环境对杨梅果实成熟和品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(9): 1794-1804. |
[11] | 齐振宇, 王婷, 桑康琪, 刘玥, 王明钦, 喻景权, 周艳虹, 夏晓剑. 设施番茄不同叶位补光对植株形态、光合及激素合成的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(8): 1504-1516. |
[12] | 刘照霞, 邢玥, 吴晓娴, 田歌, 朱占玲, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 矮化中间砧苹果施氮位置对细根分布、氮素吸收和产量品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(2): 219-232. |
[13] | 邹震, 于爱水, 任洪春, 战良, 刘更森, 冷翔鹏, 房经贵. 日光温室‘藤稔’葡萄更新修剪时期对其生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(12): 2471-2480. |
[14] | 卢素文, 郑暄昂, 王佳洋, 房经贵. 葡萄类黄酮代谢研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(12): 2506-2524. |
[15] | 刘正位1,郭丹丹1,2,彭 静1,朱红莲1,匡 晶1,季 群1,王直新1,丁 毅3,*,柯卫东1,*. 莲子产量相关性状的QTL定位[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(8): 1565-1576. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司