Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (8): 1779-1792.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0418
• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Jie, LI Tianzhu, LIU Ruyi, LI Chenhao, YUAN Zenan, LI Jianming*()
Received:
2023-03-04
Revised:
2023-07-01
Online:
2023-08-25
Published:
2023-08-23
Contact:
LI Jianming
ZHOU Jie, LI Tianzhu, LIU Ruyi, LI Chenhao, YUAN Zenan, LI Jianming. Effects of Air Humidity and Soil Water Content Coupling on Tomato Gray Mold[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(8): 1779-1792.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0418
Fig. 1 The influence of air relative humidity and soil relative water content on phenotypic changes of tomato leaves infected by Botrytis cinerea Ha:High humidity;La:Low humidity;Hs:High water content;Ms:Middle water content;Ls:Low water content. The red arrow indicates the lesion. Different capital letters indicate a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level of the same treatment at different times,and different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level of different treatments at the same time.
Fig. 2 The effect of humidity air relative humidity and soil relative water content on the infection rate of tomato leaves infected by Botrytis cinerea Ha:High humidity;La:Low humidity;Hs:High water content;Ms:Middle water content;Ls:Low water content. Arrow represents infection hypha (IH);UE: Upper epidermis;LE: Lower epidermis;PM: Palisade mesophyll;SM: Spongy mesophyll.
处理 Treatment | 时间/d Time | 栅栏组织厚度 Thickness of palisade | 海绵组织厚度 Thickness of spong | 上表皮 Upper epidermis | 下表皮 Lower epidermis | 叶片厚度 Thickness of leaf | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ha | Hs | 1 | 132.2 ± 6.0 Aa | 152.5 ± 4.9 Aa | 34.7 ± 0.8 Aa | 15.3 ± 2.6 Ab | 331.1 ± 6.4 Aa |
3 | 104.5 ± 10.9 Bc | 154.1 ± 3.9 Acd | 23.8 ± 3.0 Bd | 15.9 ± 1.5 Ac | 299.1 ± 31.1 Bc | ||
5 | 65.8 ± 4.5 Cd | 63.8 ± 0.6 Be | 7.1 ± 0.8 Cd | 6.7 ± 1.0 BCc | 150.8 ± 4.5 Cd | ||
7 | 45.5 ± 4.2 Dc | 52.3 ± 4.8 Ce | 14.2 ± 2.7 Dab | 9.0 ± 0.4 Bb | 128.2 ± 5.2 Ce | ||
10 | 25.8 ± 3.3 Ed | 27.5 ± 2.9 Dd | 6.7 ± 1.9 Dc | 4.6 ± 1.0 Cd | 63.8 ± 5.5 Dd | ||
Ms | 1 | 114.7 ± 4.1 Bb | 131.4 ± 12.6 Bbc | 30.8 ± 5.1 Aab | 15.1 ± 1.6 Bb | 293.0 ± 7.5 Bc | |
3 | 143.2 ± 3.1 Aa | 175.6 ± 7.1 Aab | 31.0 ± 3.0 Ac | 16.3 ± 2.4 Bc | 362.5 ± 11.5 Aa | ||
5 | 81.6 ± 9.0 Cc | 103.4 ± 4.4 Cd | 18.7 ± 2.6 Bc | 20.3 ± 2.2 Aa | 226.1 ± 3.5 Cc | ||
7 | 67.4 ± 5.9 Db | 63.8 ± 7.8 Dd | 12.6 ± 2.9 Cb | 8.4 ± 1.1 Cb | 151.3 ± 15.7 Dd | ||
10 | 59.4 ± 5.8 Dab | 57.1 ± 5.5 Dc | 10.9 ± 0.8 Cb | 6.7 ± 1.3 Cbc | 142.8 ± 3.9 Db | ||
Ls | 1 | 106.8 ± 5.5 Bbc | 117.1 ± 5.6 Bcd | 32.8 ± 2.3 Ba | 14.6 ± 2.7 Bb | 278.5 ± 10.4 Bd | |
3 | 128.3 ± 4.1 Ab | 144.3 ± 7.0 Ad | 41.3 ± 3.0 Aa | 22.2 ± 3.3 Ab | 334.0 ± 6.5 Aab | ||
5 | 79.9 ± 4.0 Cc | 121.6 ± 6.6 Bc | 23.4 ± 2.8 Cbc | 20.4 ± 2.0 Aa | 240.2 ± 4.8 Cc | ||
7 | 59.5 ± 6.2 Db | 72.8 ± 5.3 Ccd | 16.0 ± 2.4 Dab | 12.7 ± 2.6 Ba | 166.6 ± 8.0 Dd | ||
10 | 47.8 ± 5.1 Ec | 59.6 ± 2.5 Dc | 12.5 ± 2.9 Db | 5.6 ± 0.7 Ccd | 129.1 ± 8.6 Ec | ||
La | Hs | 1 | 114.6 ± 5.0 Ab | 140.7 ± 6.0 Bab | 26.1 ± 2.2 Ab | 25.5 ± 4.7 Aa | 312.7 ± 6.5 Bb |
3 | 123.3 ± 2.9 Ab | 190.0 ± 12.1 Aa | 25.1 ± 3.2 Ad | 18.2 ± 2.0 Bbc | 350.8 ± 13.0 Aa | ||
5 | 89.3 ± 3.9 Bc | 113.8 ± 3.6 Ccd | 25.0 ± 2.8 Ab | 13.8 ± 2.7 BCb | 241.6 ± 7.0 Cc | ||
7 | 62.6 ± 8.2 Cb | 80.8 ± 6.9 Dbc | 17.9 ± 1.7 Ba | 12.1 ± 1.9 Ca | 173.4 ± 7.9 Dc | ||
10 | 63.0 ± 5.6 Cab | 64.5 ± 6.2 Ebc | — | — | 128.9 ± 5.1 Ec | ||
Ms | 1 | 103.3 ± 8.1 Bc | 116.2 ± 11.1 Dcd | 29.8 ± 1.1 Bab | 16.0 ± 1.3 BCb | 261.1 ± 8.4 Ce | |
3 | 112.1 ± 6.7 Bc | 162.5 ± 5.6 Bbc | 36.1 ± 1.1 Ab | 36.4 ± 5.2 Aa | 346.8 ± 9.5 Bab | ||
5 | 131.6 ± 5.7 Aa | 218.2 ± 15.9 Aa | 32.1 ± 3.4 ABa | 18.0 ± 2.6 Ba | 393.1 ± 18.4 Aa | ||
7 | 79.0 ± 2.3 Ca | 140.5 ± 7.1 Ca | 17.9 ± 2.7 Ca | 12.7 ± 2.3 Ca | 246.9 ± 13.0 Ca | ||
10 | 68.6 ± 6.8 Ca | 111.0 ± 7.9 Da | 17.6 ± 2.7 Ca | 12.0 ± 1.0 Ca | 207.4 ± 4.2 Da | ||
Ls | 1 | 101.5 ± 6.9 Bc | 109.3 ± 7.6 Cd | 29.9 ± 3.6 Aab | 13.8 ± 1.6 Bb | 258.4 ± 8.6 Ce | |
3 | 111.0 ± 6.6 Ac | 159.0 ± 12.7 Acd | 28.1 ± 1.0 Acd | 13.7 ± 1.8 Bc | 320.3 ± 7.4 Abc | ||
5 | 119.4 ± 10.3 Ab | 142.0 ± 6.4 Bb | 27.0 ± 4.4 Aab | 18.6 ± 2.7 Aa | 303.0 ± 6.2 Bb | ||
7 | 77.4 ± 4.5 Ca | 87.7 ± 5.4 Db | 18.3 ± 1.7 Ba | 14.0 ± 1.0 Ba | 200.4 ± 6.9 Db | ||
10 | 57.8 ± 5.6 Db | 70.0 ± 3.5 Eb | 12.2 ± 0.9 Cb | 7.9 ± 1.3 Cb | 147.3 ± 4.8 Eb |
Table 1 The effect of humidity air relative humidity and soil relative water content humidity on the anatomical structure of tomato leaves infected by Botrytis cinerea μm
处理 Treatment | 时间/d Time | 栅栏组织厚度 Thickness of palisade | 海绵组织厚度 Thickness of spong | 上表皮 Upper epidermis | 下表皮 Lower epidermis | 叶片厚度 Thickness of leaf | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ha | Hs | 1 | 132.2 ± 6.0 Aa | 152.5 ± 4.9 Aa | 34.7 ± 0.8 Aa | 15.3 ± 2.6 Ab | 331.1 ± 6.4 Aa |
3 | 104.5 ± 10.9 Bc | 154.1 ± 3.9 Acd | 23.8 ± 3.0 Bd | 15.9 ± 1.5 Ac | 299.1 ± 31.1 Bc | ||
5 | 65.8 ± 4.5 Cd | 63.8 ± 0.6 Be | 7.1 ± 0.8 Cd | 6.7 ± 1.0 BCc | 150.8 ± 4.5 Cd | ||
7 | 45.5 ± 4.2 Dc | 52.3 ± 4.8 Ce | 14.2 ± 2.7 Dab | 9.0 ± 0.4 Bb | 128.2 ± 5.2 Ce | ||
10 | 25.8 ± 3.3 Ed | 27.5 ± 2.9 Dd | 6.7 ± 1.9 Dc | 4.6 ± 1.0 Cd | 63.8 ± 5.5 Dd | ||
Ms | 1 | 114.7 ± 4.1 Bb | 131.4 ± 12.6 Bbc | 30.8 ± 5.1 Aab | 15.1 ± 1.6 Bb | 293.0 ± 7.5 Bc | |
3 | 143.2 ± 3.1 Aa | 175.6 ± 7.1 Aab | 31.0 ± 3.0 Ac | 16.3 ± 2.4 Bc | 362.5 ± 11.5 Aa | ||
5 | 81.6 ± 9.0 Cc | 103.4 ± 4.4 Cd | 18.7 ± 2.6 Bc | 20.3 ± 2.2 Aa | 226.1 ± 3.5 Cc | ||
7 | 67.4 ± 5.9 Db | 63.8 ± 7.8 Dd | 12.6 ± 2.9 Cb | 8.4 ± 1.1 Cb | 151.3 ± 15.7 Dd | ||
10 | 59.4 ± 5.8 Dab | 57.1 ± 5.5 Dc | 10.9 ± 0.8 Cb | 6.7 ± 1.3 Cbc | 142.8 ± 3.9 Db | ||
Ls | 1 | 106.8 ± 5.5 Bbc | 117.1 ± 5.6 Bcd | 32.8 ± 2.3 Ba | 14.6 ± 2.7 Bb | 278.5 ± 10.4 Bd | |
3 | 128.3 ± 4.1 Ab | 144.3 ± 7.0 Ad | 41.3 ± 3.0 Aa | 22.2 ± 3.3 Ab | 334.0 ± 6.5 Aab | ||
5 | 79.9 ± 4.0 Cc | 121.6 ± 6.6 Bc | 23.4 ± 2.8 Cbc | 20.4 ± 2.0 Aa | 240.2 ± 4.8 Cc | ||
7 | 59.5 ± 6.2 Db | 72.8 ± 5.3 Ccd | 16.0 ± 2.4 Dab | 12.7 ± 2.6 Ba | 166.6 ± 8.0 Dd | ||
10 | 47.8 ± 5.1 Ec | 59.6 ± 2.5 Dc | 12.5 ± 2.9 Db | 5.6 ± 0.7 Ccd | 129.1 ± 8.6 Ec | ||
La | Hs | 1 | 114.6 ± 5.0 Ab | 140.7 ± 6.0 Bab | 26.1 ± 2.2 Ab | 25.5 ± 4.7 Aa | 312.7 ± 6.5 Bb |
3 | 123.3 ± 2.9 Ab | 190.0 ± 12.1 Aa | 25.1 ± 3.2 Ad | 18.2 ± 2.0 Bbc | 350.8 ± 13.0 Aa | ||
5 | 89.3 ± 3.9 Bc | 113.8 ± 3.6 Ccd | 25.0 ± 2.8 Ab | 13.8 ± 2.7 BCb | 241.6 ± 7.0 Cc | ||
7 | 62.6 ± 8.2 Cb | 80.8 ± 6.9 Dbc | 17.9 ± 1.7 Ba | 12.1 ± 1.9 Ca | 173.4 ± 7.9 Dc | ||
10 | 63.0 ± 5.6 Cab | 64.5 ± 6.2 Ebc | — | — | 128.9 ± 5.1 Ec | ||
Ms | 1 | 103.3 ± 8.1 Bc | 116.2 ± 11.1 Dcd | 29.8 ± 1.1 Bab | 16.0 ± 1.3 BCb | 261.1 ± 8.4 Ce | |
3 | 112.1 ± 6.7 Bc | 162.5 ± 5.6 Bbc | 36.1 ± 1.1 Ab | 36.4 ± 5.2 Aa | 346.8 ± 9.5 Bab | ||
5 | 131.6 ± 5.7 Aa | 218.2 ± 15.9 Aa | 32.1 ± 3.4 ABa | 18.0 ± 2.6 Ba | 393.1 ± 18.4 Aa | ||
7 | 79.0 ± 2.3 Ca | 140.5 ± 7.1 Ca | 17.9 ± 2.7 Ca | 12.7 ± 2.3 Ca | 246.9 ± 13.0 Ca | ||
10 | 68.6 ± 6.8 Ca | 111.0 ± 7.9 Da | 17.6 ± 2.7 Ca | 12.0 ± 1.0 Ca | 207.4 ± 4.2 Da | ||
Ls | 1 | 101.5 ± 6.9 Bc | 109.3 ± 7.6 Cd | 29.9 ± 3.6 Aab | 13.8 ± 1.6 Bb | 258.4 ± 8.6 Ce | |
3 | 111.0 ± 6.6 Ac | 159.0 ± 12.7 Acd | 28.1 ± 1.0 Acd | 13.7 ± 1.8 Bc | 320.3 ± 7.4 Abc | ||
5 | 119.4 ± 10.3 Ab | 142.0 ± 6.4 Bb | 27.0 ± 4.4 Aab | 18.6 ± 2.7 Aa | 303.0 ± 6.2 Bb | ||
7 | 77.4 ± 4.5 Ca | 87.7 ± 5.4 Db | 18.3 ± 1.7 Ba | 14.0 ± 1.0 Ba | 200.4 ± 6.9 Db | ||
10 | 57.8 ± 5.6 Db | 70.0 ± 3.5 Eb | 12.2 ± 0.9 Cb | 7.9 ± 1.3 Cb | 147.3 ± 4.8 Eb |
Fig. 3 The effect of humidity air relative humidity and soil relative water content on the active oxygen content and antioxidant enzymes activities of tomato leaves infected by Botrytis cinerea Ha:High humidity;La:Low humidity;Hs:High water content;Ms:Middle water content;Ls:Low water content. Different capital letters indicate a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level of the same treatment at different times,and different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level of different treatments at the same time.
Fig. 4 The effect of humidity air relative humidity and soil relative water content on the maximum photochemical efficiency of Botrytis cinerea infecting tomato leaves Ha:High humidity;La:Low humidity;Hs:High water content;Ms:Middle water content;Ls:Low water content. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level of different treatments.
处理 Treatment | 产量/(kg · hm-2) Yield | 可溶性固形物/% SSC | 酸含量/% Acid | 糖酸比 Brix/Acid | 番茄红素含量/ (μg · g-1) Lycopene content | 可溶性蛋白含量/ (μg · g-1) Soluble protein content | 维生素C含量/ (μg · g-1) Vitamin C content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ha | Hs | 2046.3 ± 103.4 d | 4.9 ± 0.1 d | 0.5 ± 0.03 c | 9.6 ± 0.8 a | 28.8 ± 1.9 d | 47.7 ± 2.9 d | 184.2 ± 9.9 c |
Ms | 2332.1 ± 102.6 c | 5.5 ± 0.3 ab | 0.6 ± 0.04 b | 8.7 ± 0.2 ab | 34.3 ± 0.5 c | 66.9 ± 1.3 c | 266.7 ± 6.0 b | |
Ls | 2442.6 ± 116.1 bc | 5.1 ± 0.1 cd | 0.5 ± 0.05 c | 9.8 ± 0.9 a | 29.7 ± 0.8 d | 68.0 ± 2.0 c | 215.4 ± 15.2 c | |
La | Hs | 2567.3 ± 155.5 bc | 5.3 ± 0.1 bc | 0.5 ± 0.05 bc | 10.2 ± 1.0 a | 54.7 ± 1.2 a | 64.0 ± 2.1 c | 197.1 ± 19.3 c |
Ms | 3828.8 ± 95.4 a | 5.6 ± 0.1 ab | 0.6 ± 0.03 bc | 10.1 ± 0.5 a | 43.4 ± 1.5 b | 98.9 ± 2.8 a | 257.6 ± 20.6 b | |
Ls | 2676.1 ± 148.5 b | 5.7 ± 0.2 a | 0.8 ± 0.05 a | 7.5 ± 0.6 b | 35.0 ± 0.7 c | 74.5 ± 2.8 b | 300.0 ± 3.4 a | |
a | 115.2** | 24.5** | 6.9* | 0.1 | 384.7** | 175.9** | 13.3** | |
s | 40.1** | 9.0** | 8.1** | 3.1 | 65.8** | 129.6** | 32.8** | |
a × s | 28.9** | 2.7 NS | 14.7** | 7.6** | 84.9** | 29.2** | 12.3** |
Table 2 The effect of humidity air relative humidity(a)and soil relative water content(s)on fruit quality and yield of tomato plants infected by Botrytis cinerea
处理 Treatment | 产量/(kg · hm-2) Yield | 可溶性固形物/% SSC | 酸含量/% Acid | 糖酸比 Brix/Acid | 番茄红素含量/ (μg · g-1) Lycopene content | 可溶性蛋白含量/ (μg · g-1) Soluble protein content | 维生素C含量/ (μg · g-1) Vitamin C content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ha | Hs | 2046.3 ± 103.4 d | 4.9 ± 0.1 d | 0.5 ± 0.03 c | 9.6 ± 0.8 a | 28.8 ± 1.9 d | 47.7 ± 2.9 d | 184.2 ± 9.9 c |
Ms | 2332.1 ± 102.6 c | 5.5 ± 0.3 ab | 0.6 ± 0.04 b | 8.7 ± 0.2 ab | 34.3 ± 0.5 c | 66.9 ± 1.3 c | 266.7 ± 6.0 b | |
Ls | 2442.6 ± 116.1 bc | 5.1 ± 0.1 cd | 0.5 ± 0.05 c | 9.8 ± 0.9 a | 29.7 ± 0.8 d | 68.0 ± 2.0 c | 215.4 ± 15.2 c | |
La | Hs | 2567.3 ± 155.5 bc | 5.3 ± 0.1 bc | 0.5 ± 0.05 bc | 10.2 ± 1.0 a | 54.7 ± 1.2 a | 64.0 ± 2.1 c | 197.1 ± 19.3 c |
Ms | 3828.8 ± 95.4 a | 5.6 ± 0.1 ab | 0.6 ± 0.03 bc | 10.1 ± 0.5 a | 43.4 ± 1.5 b | 98.9 ± 2.8 a | 257.6 ± 20.6 b | |
Ls | 2676.1 ± 148.5 b | 5.7 ± 0.2 a | 0.8 ± 0.05 a | 7.5 ± 0.6 b | 35.0 ± 0.7 c | 74.5 ± 2.8 b | 300.0 ± 3.4 a | |
a | 115.2** | 24.5** | 6.9* | 0.1 | 384.7** | 175.9** | 13.3** | |
s | 40.1** | 9.0** | 8.1** | 3.1 | 65.8** | 129.6** | 32.8** | |
a × s | 28.9** | 2.7 NS | 14.7** | 7.6** | 84.9** | 29.2** | 12.3** |
[1] |
doi: 10.1111/ppa.v70.1 URL |
[2] |
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.11.014 URL |
[3] |
doi: 10.1007/s11947-015-1515-y URL |
[4] |
|
陈夕军, 朱键鑫, 陈羽, 张青, 张家豪, 张孝然, 黄奔立. 2015. 抗白粉病黄瓜品种的叶片组织结构及其生理生化. 江苏农业学报, 31 (1):55-61.
|
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-10-14-0264-R pmid: 26218433 |
[6] |
doi: 10.1094/Phyto-66-1279 URL |
[7] |
|
高翠珠. 2018. 湖北省设施大棚草莓和番茄灰霉病发生动态及影响因素分析[硕士论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学.
|
|
[8] |
|
高俊凤. 2006. 总维生素C、 可溶性蛋白的测定//植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
|
|
[9] |
doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60264-3 URL |
[10] |
|
葛铭佳, 张丽媛, 艾佳音, 吉茹, 刘静珂, 刘梦斐, 何玲. 2020. 热激和山梨酸钾处理对猕猴桃果实灰霉病的抑制效应. 农业工程学报, 36 (7):316-323.
|
|
[11] |
doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00560-1 pmid: 10898976 |
[12] |
|
景岚, 王丽芳, 康俊, 包海柱, 李莉. 2009. 向日葵品种叶片组织结构与抗锈病的关系. 植物保护, 35 (2):81-84.
|
|
[13] |
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00457-X URL |
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
李宝聚, 陈立芹, 孟伟军, 王福建. 2003a. 湿度调控对番茄灰霉菌侵染的影响. 植物病理学报, 33 (2):167-169.
|
|
[16] |
|
李宝聚, 陈立芹, 孟伟军, 王福建. 2003b. 温湿度调控对番茄灰霉病菌产生的细胞壁降解酶的影响. 植物病理学报, 33 (3):209-212.
|
|
[17] |
|
李凤云, 李宝聚, 许淑艳. 1992. 番茄灰霉病病原菌的生物学特性. 辽宁农业科学,(4):34-36.
|
|
[18] |
|
李洪连, 徐敬友. 2007. 发病率和病情指数的计算方法//农业植物病理学实验实习指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
|
|
[19] |
|
李海英, 刘亚光, 杨庆凯. 2002. 大豆叶片结构与灰斑病抗性的研究Ⅱ. 大豆叶片组织结构与灰斑病抗性的关系. 中国油料作物学报, 24 (2):58-60.
|
|
[20] |
|
李建明, 樊翔宇, 闫芳芳, 李惠, 蔡东升. 2017. 基于蒸腾模型决策的灌溉量对甜瓜产量及品质的影响. 农业工程学报, 33 (21):156-162.
|
|
[21] |
|
李建明, 潘铜华, 王玲慧, 杜清洁, 常毅博, 张大龙, 刘媛. 2014. 水肥耦合对番茄光合、产量及水分利用效率的影响. 农业工程学报, 30 (10):82-90.
|
|
[22] |
doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2016.08.004 URL |
[23] |
|
刘志国. 2014. 枣树对植原体侵染的光合响应及其抗性诱导研究[博士论文]. 保定: 河北农业大学.
|
|
[24] |
|
马青, 崔鸿文, 魏国荣, 董志有. 1995. 黄瓜抗霜霉性的组织学和超微结构研究. 西北农业大学学报, 23 (5):33-38.
|
|
[25] |
|
马沙一. 2018. 不同温度对黄瓜霜霉病菌侵染组织生理生化变化的影响[硕士论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学.
|
|
[26] |
|
马莹莹, 贾娇, 苏前富, 孟玲敏, 高洁, 晋齐鸣. 2015. 玉米抵御玉蜀黍尾孢菌侵入的生理机制. 植物保护学报, 42 (3):340-346.
|
|
[27] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.05.014 URL |
[28] |
|
孟祥东, 傅俊范, 周如军, 严雪瑞. 2007. 保护地主要园艺作物灰霉病菌生物学特性比较研究. 沈阳农业大学学报, 38 (3):322-326.
|
|
[29] |
doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.11.003 URL |
[30] |
|
孙群, 胡江景. 2005. 植物生理学研究技术. 杨陵: 西北农林科技大学出版社.
|
|
[31] |
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00224-3 URL |
[32] |
doi: 10.1111/ppl.2004.122.issue-1 URL |
[33] |
|
王军, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 王苗苗, 贾雪洁, 郭志飞, 孙雷雷, 聂秀美. 2020. 大麦黄矮病毒侵染对燕麦光合及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 草地学报, 28 (4):923-931.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.04.008 |
|
[34] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0391 |
王莹, 秦阳阳, 曾婷, 廖平, 张伟, 周彦, 周常勇. 2022. 柑橘黄脉病毒侵染对柠檬光合特性和叶绿体超微结构的影响. 园艺学报, 49 (4):861-867.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0391 |
|
[35] |
doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00417.x pmid: 20507522 |
[36] |
|
徐保国, 周天楚, 魏本喜, 任晓锋, 吴本刚, 周存山, 马海乐. 2018. 催化式红外辐照改善樱桃番茄去皮效果及品质. 农业工程学报, 34 (24):299-305.
|
|
[37] |
|
杨利敏, 仝赞华, 郭立华, 蒋细良, 邱德文, 李淼. 2015. 番茄灰霉生防菌 CQ 的分子鉴定及其生防效果研究. 中国生物防治学报, 31 (6):956-960.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2015.06.020 |
|
[38] |
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078658 URL |
[39] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0949 |
张静洁, 朱云云, 卢亦帆, 李勇. 2021. 烟管菌‘M1’对番茄灰霉病的防治及促生作用. 园艺学报, 48 (5):960-972.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0949 |
|
[40] |
|
张咏梅, 马晖玲, 唐云智. 2016. 豌豆白粉菌侵染对活性氧迸发规律和紫花苜蓿叶片结构的影响. 草业学报, 25 (11):34-42.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2016011 |
|
[41] |
doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2022.04.008 URL |
[42] |
|
郑国华. 2001. 炭疽病侵染对枇杷叶片H2O2含量和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 福建农业大学学报, 30 (3):353-356.
|
|
[43] |
|
郑伟, 吴亚维, 王彬, 宋莎, 罗昌国. 2017. 苹果叶片结构与白粉病抗性的相关性初步研究. 西南农业学报, 30 (9):2108-2112.
|
|
[44] |
|
[1] | ZHAO Xia, LI Gang, LIU Lifeng, HU Panpan, SONG Yanhong, and ZHOU Houcheng. A New Strawberry Cultivar‘Huafeng 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 35-36. |
[2] | LI Renjie , WANG Chenggang , ZHANG Shengnan , SHAN Guolei , CHEN Guohu , HOU Jinfeng , HUANG Xingxue , and YUAN Lingyun, . A Non Heading Chinese Cabbage Cultivar‘Xiakang 718’with Heat Resistance [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 43-44. |
[3] | SU Yinling, YANG Zixiang, DAN Zhong, MA Jixian, YANG Long, LI Yirong, TANG Zhengfu, WANG Lingmin, and MU Wanfu. A New Tomato Cultivar‘Yun Tomato 68’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 63-64. |
[4] | FAN Juan, SHEN Songzhen, MIAO Qingqing, ZHANG Lehui, YAO Enpeng, and PEI Zhuoqiang . A New Tomato Cultivar‘Weihong 16’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 65-66. |
[5] | YAN Xi, HE Lei, LAI Wei, LIU Chongzheng, YANG Hong , and JIANG Hong. A New Pepper Cultivar‘Qianla 16’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 71-72. |
[6] | LI Jinling , ZHAO Zhi, LUO Chunli, LIU Hongchang, WANG Hualei, LUO Fulai, and HUANG Mingjin . A New Uncaria rhynchophylla Cultivar‘Guigou 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 207-208. |
[7] | JI Yajing, LI Jinyan, ZHANG Peiyu, MA Liqun, ZHU Hongliang. Research Progress on the Regulatory Mechanism of Shape Formation in Tomato Fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(9): 2015-2030. |
[8] | ZHANG Qiaoli, CHEN Di, SONG Yanping, ZHU Hongliang, LUO Yunbo, QU Guiqin. Review on Transcriptional Regulation of Chlorophyll Metabolism Network in Tomato Fruits [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(9): 2031-2047. |
[9] | ZAI Wenshan, XIONG Zili, MA Yanru, SHI Jianlei, ZHANG Haili. A New Tomato Cultivar‘Ouxiu 816’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(9): 2061-2062. |
[10] | CAO Xiongjun, HAN Jiayu, CHENG Guo, WANG Bo, MA Guangren, LIN Ling, TAN Zongkun, HUANG Qiumi, CHEN Xiao, CHEN Fuyi, SHI Xiaofang, PAN Fengping, BAI Xianjin. Effects of Light Duration and Intensity on Yield Formation of‘Shine- Muscat’Grape [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(8): 1739-1746. |
[11] | PAN Guanghui, LUO Jia, YIN Xiangui, RU Xuejuan. A New Tomato Cultivar‘Yufan 421’with Late Blight Resistance [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(8): 1805-1806. |
[12] | ZHANG Chen, LI Mengjie, YANG Xiaoxue, WANG Meiyun, XIAO Dong, WANG Jianjun, HOU Xilin, HU Jun, LIU Tongkun. The Creation and Study on Characteristics of New Material of Autotetraploid Purple Tsai-tai [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1419-1428. |
[13] | SHEN Xinyan, HOU Xiaolei, SUN Peinan, LIU Minmin, TANG Yaping, LI Ning, LU Yong’en, YE Zhibiao, OUYANG Bo. Drought Tolerance Improvement of Processing Tomato by Molecular Marker Assisted Selection [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1429-1443. |
[14] | YANG Mengxia, LIU Xiaolin, CAO Xue, WEI Kai, NING Yu, YANG Pei, LI Shanshan, CHEN Ziyue, WANG Xiaoxuan, GUO Yanmei, DU Yongchen, LI Junming, LIU Lei, LI Xin, HUANG Zejun. Construction and Application of a CRISPR/Cas9 System for Multiplex Gene Editing in Tomato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1215-1229. |
[15] | GONG Danmin, CAI Linzhi, DING Ren, MA Yanyan, WANG Wanxin, XIONG Xingyao, HU Xinxi. Effects of Different Potassium Fertilizers on Growth and Absorption and Accumulation of Mineral Elements and Cadmium in Potato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1332-1342. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd