https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner1.jpg|#|苹果
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner2.jpg|#|甘蓝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner3.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner4.jpg|#|灵芝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner5.jpg|#|桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner6.jpg|#|黄瓜
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner7.jpg|#|蝴蝶兰
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner8.jpg|#|樱桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner9.jpg|#|观赏荷花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner10.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner11.jpg|#|月季
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner12.jpg|#|菊花

园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 635-652.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0634

• 遗传育种·种质资源·分子生物学 •    下一篇

桃SAP基因家族鉴定及在非生物胁迫下砧木中的缓解响应

任家玄, 张帆*(), 王晨冰   

  1. 甘肃省农业科学院林果花卉研究所,兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-04 修回日期:2026-02-05 出版日期:2026-03-25 发布日期:2026-03-20
  • 通讯作者:
    * E-mail:
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32360717); 国家自然科学基金项目(32460734)

Identification of the Peach SAP Gene Family and Alleviative Response in Rootstocks Under Abiotic Stress

REN Jiaxuan, ZHANG Fan*(), WANG Chenbing   

  1. Institute of Forestry,Fruits and Floriculture,Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Lanzhou 730070,China
  • Received:2025-12-04 Revised:2026-02-05 Published:2026-03-25 Online:2026-03-20

摘要: 采用生物信息方法对桃SAP基因进行鉴定,明确其结构特征和在逆境缓解后砧木中的表达模式。结果表明,在桃基因组中共鉴定出了11个PpSAP家族成员,分子量为16 268.42 Da(PpSAP3) ~ 31 983.27 Da(PpSAP8),只有3个成员(PpSAP4PpSAP8PpSAP9)含有内含子,亚细胞定位预测显示大部分成员定位于细胞核。系统发育树分析发现,PpSAP蛋白可分为ⅠA、ⅠC、ⅡA和ⅡB 4类。PpSAP家族多数成员结构域为A20-AN1,同结构域成员具有相似的Motif分布。顺式作用元件分析表明,PpSAP主要与光、激素和非生物胁迫反应有关。此外,串联重复事件有助于PpSAP基因的扩张。通过GO富集分析鉴定了PpSAP的13个GO ID,蛋白互作网络显示7个成员与4个蛋白存在互作。miRNA互作分析鉴定出175个靶向PpSAP蛋白的miRNA,其中miR172家族与多个成员存在特异性互作。对非生物胁迫缓解后PpSAP在桃砧木(白花山桃、中桃抗砧1号、SH、GF677)和樱桃李砧木(李1、李3、李5、RA)中的表达进行qRT-PCR分析显示,干旱胁迫下,PpSAP4在李3、GF677 + Spd和GF677 + PEG缓解处理后均高表达,PpSAP6在李1 + Spd处理后高表达,PpSAP7PpSAP8在李3 + PEG及PpSAP9在SH + Spd处理后显著表达。低温胁迫下,PpSAP3在李5 + ALA、RA + ALA、RA + Spd和SH、RA + PEG缓解处理后显著表达,PpSAP4在GF677 + PEG处理后最高表达(1 404.05),PpSAP8在李5、RA的ALA和Spd处理后高表达。盐碱胁迫下,PpSAP1在中桃抗砧1号 + ALA缓解处理后高表达,PpSAP6在李1 + ALA处理下显著表达,而PpSAP9在SH + ALA和GF677 + PEG处理后均显著表达。说明外源缓解物质ALA、Spd和PEG能特异性诱导关键PpSAP的高表达,其调控效果因砧木类型与胁迫环境的不同而存在显著差异。综上,推测PpSAP可能是缓解非生物胁迫的关键基因家族。

关键词: 桃, 砧木, SAP基因家族, 生物信息学, 非生物胁迫

Abstract:

The peach SAP genes were identified using bioinformatics methods to determine their structural characteristics and expression patterns following stress alleviation. Results showed that 11 PpSAP family members were identified in the peach genome,with molecular weights ranging from 16 268.42 Da(PpSAP3)to 31 983.27 Da(PpSAP8). Only three genes PpSAP4PpSAP8,and PpSAP9 contained introns. Subcellular localization predictions indicated that most members are localized in the nucleus. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that PpSAP proteins can be classified into four groups:ⅠA,ⅠC,ⅡA,and ⅡB. Most PpSAP family members contain A20-AN1 domains,and proteins within the same group exhibit similar motif distributions. cis-Acting element analysis suggested that PpSAPs are primarily associated with light,hormone,and abiotic stress responses. Moreover,tandem duplication events contributed to the expansion of the PpSAP gene family. GO enrichment analysis identified 13 GO terms for PpSAPs,while a protein-protein interaction network indicated interactions between seven PpSAP members and four other proteins. miRNA interaction analysis identified 175 miRNAs targeting PpSAP proteins,among which the miR172 family showed specific interactions with multiple PpSAP members. qRT-PCR analysis of PpSAP expression in peach rootstocks(Baihua Shantao,Zhongtao Kangzhen 1,SH,GF677)and Prunus cerasifera rootstocks(Li 1,Li 3,Li 5,RA)after mitigation of abiotic stress revealed that under drought stress,PpSAP4 showed high expression in Li 3 and in GF677 treated with Spd or PEG,PpSAP6 was highly expressed in Li 1 treated with Spd,while PpSAP7 and PpSAP8 were significantly upregulated in Li 3 treated with PEG,and PpSAP9 was notably expressed in SH treated with Spd. Under low-temperature stress,PpSAP3 exhibited significant expression in Li 5 and RA treated with ALA,RA treated with Spd,and SH and RA treated with PEG;PpSAP4 reached its highest expression level(1 404.05)in GF677 treated with PEG;PpSAP8 showed high expression in Li 5 and RA after treatment with ALA or Spd. Under saline-alkali stress,PpSAP1 was highly expressed in Zhongtao Kangzhen 1 treated with ALA,PpSAP6 was significantly upregulated in Li 1 treated with ALA,while PpSAP9 showed notable expression in both SH treated with ALA and GF677 treated with PEG. These results indicate that the exogenous mitigators ALA,Spd,and PEG can specifically induce high expression of key PpSAP genes,and their regulatory effects vary significantly depending on the rootstock type and stress environment. In conclusion,PpSAP is hypothesized to be a key gene family involved in mitigating abiotic stress.

Key words: peach, rootstock, SAP gene family, bioinformatics, abiotic stress