园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 1285-1300.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0354
朱芳漪, 苏红玲, 顾翎禾, 张冲, 逄洪波, 佟德利*(
), 张颖*(
)
收稿日期:2025-06-10
修回日期:2026-02-12
出版日期:2026-05-25
发布日期:2026-05-26
通讯作者:
基金资助:
ZHU Fangyi, SU Hongling, GU Linghe, ZHANG Chong, PANG Hongbo, TONG Deli*(
), ZHANG Ying*(
)
Received:2025-06-10
Revised:2026-02-12
Published:2026-05-25
Online:2026-05-26
Contact:
摘要:
为探究褐藻寡糖诱导CsWRKY46基因调控黄瓜幼苗响应冷胁迫的分子机制,以黄瓜‘CU2’野生型和CsWRKY46基因敲除型为材料,通过喷施0.8%褐藻寡糖预处理后进行4 ℃冷胁迫处理,分析褐藻寡糖对黄瓜幼苗抗氧化酶活性、丙二醛含量以及渗透调节物质含量的影响,并进行转录组测序。结果表明,褐藻寡糖预处理显著提高了冷胁迫下黄瓜幼苗的抗氧化能力和耐冷性。转录组测序结果显示,褐藻寡糖诱导的差异表达基因主要富集在植物激素信号转导和蛋白质加工等途径,其中脱落酸和油菜素内酯信号途径相关基因的表达发生显著变化。综上,褐藻寡糖可能通过调控CsWRKY46基因及其下游信号途径,增强黄瓜幼苗对冷胁迫的耐受性。
朱芳漪, 苏红玲, 顾翎禾, 张冲, 逄洪波, 佟德利, 张颖. 褐藻寡糖诱导CsWRKY46调控黄瓜幼苗响应冷胁迫及转录组分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(5): 1285-1300.
ZHU Fangyi, SU Hongling, GU Linghe, ZHANG Chong, PANG Hongbo, TONG Deli, ZHANG Ying. Alginate Oligosaccharides Induced CsWRKY46 to Regulate Cucumber Response to Cold Stress and Transcriptome Analysis[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(5): 1285-1300.
| 受害级别 Injury level | 总体症状描述 Overall symptom description | 具体叶片受害情况 Specific leaf damage situation |
|---|---|---|
| S0 | 无受害症状 No symptoms of victimization | 所有叶片均无受害症状。 All leaves had no damage symptoms. |
| S1 | 轻微受害 Minor victimization | 叶片稍皱缩;下数第1或第2叶叶缘发黄或略失水;第3叶和新叶(心叶)无受害症状。 Leaves slightly shr;the lower 1st or 2nd leaf margin is yellow or slightly dehydrated;the third leaf and new leaf(heart leaf)had no symptoms. |
| S2 | 中度受害 Moderate victimization | 叶片皱缩;下数第1叶和第2叶叶缘严重失水;第3叶叶缘发黄或略为失水;心叶无明显受害症状。 Leaf shrinkage;the first leaf and the second leaf edge serious water loss;the third leaf margin is yellow or slightly dehydrated;there were no obvious symptoms of heart leaf injury. |
| S3 | 较重受害 Heavy victimization | 下数第1叶和第2叶中部出现脱水斑;第3叶叶缘严重失水;心叶轻微失水。 Dehydration spots appeared in the middle of the first and second leaves. The third leaf margin is seriously dehydrated;heart leaves slightly dehydrated. |
| S4 | 严重受害(部分可恢复) Seriously victimized(partially recoverable) | 下数第1叶和第2叶中部脱水斑连接成片,叶片萎蔫;第3叶中部开始显现脱水斑;心叶失水较明显;但幼苗置于常温下,心叶尚能恢复。 The dehydration spots in the middle of the first and second leaves were connected into pieces,and the leaves wilted. Dehydration spots began to appear in the middle of the third leaf;the water loss of the heart leaf is obvious;however,when the seedlings were placed at room temperature,the heart leaves could still recover. |
| S5 | 极度严重受害(不可恢复) Extremely serious victimization(unrecoverable) | 所有叶片严重失水萎蔫;幼苗即使再置于常温下也不能恢复。 All leaves were severely dehydrated and wilted;the seedlings could not recover even under normal temperature. |
表1 植物幼苗受害症状分级标准
Table 1 Seedling damage symptom grading scale
| 受害级别 Injury level | 总体症状描述 Overall symptom description | 具体叶片受害情况 Specific leaf damage situation |
|---|---|---|
| S0 | 无受害症状 No symptoms of victimization | 所有叶片均无受害症状。 All leaves had no damage symptoms. |
| S1 | 轻微受害 Minor victimization | 叶片稍皱缩;下数第1或第2叶叶缘发黄或略失水;第3叶和新叶(心叶)无受害症状。 Leaves slightly shr;the lower 1st or 2nd leaf margin is yellow or slightly dehydrated;the third leaf and new leaf(heart leaf)had no symptoms. |
| S2 | 中度受害 Moderate victimization | 叶片皱缩;下数第1叶和第2叶叶缘严重失水;第3叶叶缘发黄或略为失水;心叶无明显受害症状。 Leaf shrinkage;the first leaf and the second leaf edge serious water loss;the third leaf margin is yellow or slightly dehydrated;there were no obvious symptoms of heart leaf injury. |
| S3 | 较重受害 Heavy victimization | 下数第1叶和第2叶中部出现脱水斑;第3叶叶缘严重失水;心叶轻微失水。 Dehydration spots appeared in the middle of the first and second leaves. The third leaf margin is seriously dehydrated;heart leaves slightly dehydrated. |
| S4 | 严重受害(部分可恢复) Seriously victimized(partially recoverable) | 下数第1叶和第2叶中部脱水斑连接成片,叶片萎蔫;第3叶中部开始显现脱水斑;心叶失水较明显;但幼苗置于常温下,心叶尚能恢复。 The dehydration spots in the middle of the first and second leaves were connected into pieces,and the leaves wilted. Dehydration spots began to appear in the middle of the third leaf;the water loss of the heart leaf is obvious;however,when the seedlings were placed at room temperature,the heart leaves could still recover. |
| S5 | 极度严重受害(不可恢复) Extremely serious victimization(unrecoverable) | 所有叶片严重失水萎蔫;幼苗即使再置于常温下也不能恢复。 All leaves were severely dehydrated and wilted;the seedlings could not recover even under normal temperature. |
图1 不同基因型黄瓜幼苗在不同处理下的表型 对照:正常生长;T1:低温胁迫(4 ℃);T2:褐藻寡糖预处理后低温胁迫(4 ℃)
Fig. 1 Phenotypes of cucumber seedlings with different genotypes under different treatments Control:Normal growth;T1:Low temperature stress(4 ℃);T2:Alginate oligosaccharides pretreatment after low temperature stress(4 ℃)
| 处理Treatment | 野生型 Wild type | CsWRKY46-CR1 | CsWRKY46-CR2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.25 b ± 0.0038 | 0.35 a ± 0.0077 | 0.40 a ± 0.0067 |
| T2 | 0.20 c ± 0.0067 | 0.28 b ± 0.0067 | 0.32 b ± 0.0067 |
表2 不同基因型黄瓜幼苗在不同处理下的冷害指数
Table 2 Chilling injury index of cucumber seedlings with different genotypesunder different treatments
| 处理Treatment | 野生型 Wild type | CsWRKY46-CR1 | CsWRKY46-CR2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.25 b ± 0.0038 | 0.35 a ± 0.0077 | 0.40 a ± 0.0067 |
| T2 | 0.20 c ± 0.0067 | 0.28 b ± 0.0067 | 0.32 b ± 0.0067 |
图2 不同处理和基因型黄瓜幼苗的丙二醛(MDA)含量 图中不同小写字母表示各处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。下同
Fig. 2 Malondialdehyde(MDA)content in cucumber seedlings under different treatments and genotypes Different lowercase letters in the figure indicated significant differences among treatments(P < 0.05). The same below
图5 黄瓜不同比较组差异表达基因数量统计 WT:野生型。下同
Fig. 5 Statistics of differentially expressed gene numbers among different comparison groups in cucumber WT:Wild type. The same below
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
|
白如意. 2023. 叶面喷施褪黑素对低温胁迫下南瓜幼苗生长及产量和品质的影响[硕士论文]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学.
|
|
| [3] |
doi: 10.3390/horticulturae11030251 URL |
| [4] |
doi: 10.1007/s00709-013-0496-9 pmid: 23558902 |
| [5] |
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-1289 |
|
陈宏艳, 李小二, 李忠光. 2022. 糖信号及其在植物响应逆境胁迫中的作用. 生物技术通报, 38 (7):80-89.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-1289 |
|
| [6] |
doi: 10.1111/nph.2018.218.issue-1 URL |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv328 URL |
| [9] |
doi: 10.1111/pce.2005.28.issue-8 URL |
| [10] |
doi: 10.1007/s00344-005-0079-x URL |
| [11] |
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-0626 |
|
黄幸, 丁峰, 彭宏祥, 潘介春, 何新华, 徐炯志, 李琳. 2019. 植物WRKY转录因子家族研究进展. 生物技术通报, 35 (12):129-143.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-0626 |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
|
李合生. 2000. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社:195-197.
|
|
| [15] |
|
|
李红霞, 汪妤, 张战凤, 彭惠茹, 倪中福. 2013. 植物转录因子与作物抗逆胁迫关系的研究进展. 麦类作物学报, 33 (3):613-618.
|
|
| [16] |
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-471 |
| [17] |
|
|
刘航, 冯立强, 刘兴江. 2015. 寡糖对小麦脱落酸合成的影响. 浙江农业学报, 27 (1):4.
|
|
| [18] |
|
|
刘楠, 韩毅科, 张桂华, 崔兴华, 魏爱民, 杜胜利. 2011. 温室黄瓜早熟性状的相关分析. 山西农业科学, 39 (7):655-656,707.
|
|
| [19] |
|
|
李小芳, 张志良. 2016. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社:91-92.
|
|
| [20] |
doi: 10.1104/pp.60.2.271 URL |
|
陆海芹, 李娜, 蒋凯旋, 王幼平, 蒋金金. 2024. Nac转录因子调控植物生长发育和胁迫应答的研究进展. 植物生理学报, 60 (2):271-283.
|
|
| [21] |
|
|
罗勇, 陈燕, 温贝贝, 宋小凤, 张芳玲, 王坤波. 2022. 茶树WRKY转录因子的研究进展. 分子植物育种, 20 (11):9.
|
|
| [22] |
doi: 10.3390/ijms19123737 URL |
| [23] |
|
|
王中华, 李晓刚, 杨青松, 李慧, 阚家亮, 王金星, 王宏, 蔺经, 盛宝龙, 常有宏. 2023. 叶面喷施褐藻寡糖磷钾肥对早熟砂梨叶片与果实性状的影响. 江苏农业学报, 39 (2):498-503.
|
|
| [24] |
|
|
吴雪霞, 查丁石, 杨少军. 2010. 我国黄瓜育种研究进展. 江西农业学报, 22 (9):53-55,59.
|
|
| [25] |
|
|
吴宇欣, 蔡昌杨, 唐诗蓓, 谢裕红, 王晓艳, 朱强. 2023. 植物响应低温的生长发育及分子机制研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 51 (19):1-9.
|
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
doi: 10.1007/s11056-009-9167-2 URL |
| [28] |
|
|
杨艳, 刘军, 周晓慧, 刘松瑜, 庄勇. 2025. 茄子SmWRKY4的克隆及耐冷性功能验证. 园艺学报, 52 (1):101-110.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0880 |
|
| [29] |
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.05.012 URL |
| [30] |
|
|
尉辉, 孟婧, 刘亚琦, 关玉熙, 王炳文, 宋文豪, 唐欣, 束靖. 2022. Em菌浸种对低温处理黄瓜萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 山东农业工程学院学报, 39 (9):35-38.
|
|
| [31] |
|
|
于贤昌, 邢禹贤, 马红, 魏珉. 1998. 不同砧木与接穗对黄瓜嫁接苗抗冷性的影响. 中国农业科学, 31 (2):41-47.
|
|
| [32] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0825 |
|
张圣平, 董邵云, 官健涛, 苗晗, 刘小萍, 顾兴芳. 2025. 黄瓜抗病分子育种研究进展. 园艺学报, 52 (3):773-791.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0825 |
|
| [33] |
|
|
张颖, 刘佳, 廉想, 张金梅, 佟德利. 2018. 黄瓜CsWRKY32基因的cDNA克隆及生物信息学分析. 沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版), 36 (5):441-445.
|
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
|
赵炀, 李永生, 高秀峰. 2015. 基于愈创木酚荧光减量准确测定过氧化物酶活性的新方法. 分析化学, 43 (7):1040-1046.
|
|
| [36] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110848 URL |
| [37] |
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.229575 URL |
| [38] |
|
|
邹琦. 2003. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社:161-162.
|
| [1] | 李岩, 刘剑辉, 刘思宇, 王雪, 王丽冬, 李金龙, 赵丹, 王娟. 华南型黄瓜新品种‘威剑’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 145-146. |
| [2] | 朱永芳, 姜玉蕾, 郭先锋. PlWRKY65影响芍药叶片响应细极链格孢菌侵染的防御通路分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(3): 709-722. |
| [3] | 折建局, 田雅珊, 陈风, 党峰峰. CaWRKY27通过调控CaPR1和CaPR1L的表达介导辣椒对青枯菌的免疫[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(3): 831-844. |
| [4] | 张作标, 许春梅, 柳景兰, 高嫱, 杨述, 刘思宇, 贾云鹤, 赵丹, 胡凯凤, 孟雪娇, 李金龙, 张雪岩. 黄瓜新品种‘绿春3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 157-158. |
| [5] | 邓强, 王惠哲, 曹明明, 杨瑞环, 李波. 露地黄瓜新品种‘津优619’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 159-160. |
| [6] | 王惠哲, 杨瑞环, 邓强, 曹明明. 抗黑星病黄瓜新品种‘津优325号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 161-162. |
| [7] | 胡继军, 邰连赛, 王天宇, 周 琦, 金海军. 黄瓜新品种‘短把申青’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S1): 125-126. |
| [8] | 李媚晴, 罗思菲, 贾曜豪, 王维贵, 孙锦. 黄瓜脱镁螯合酶基因CsMDC表达分析及其调控叶绿素降解的功能验证[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(6): 1463-1476. |
| [9] | 李姿燕, 陈炜曦, 李子涵, 黎茵, 梁峰铭, 曾祥利, 荐红举, 吕典秋. 基于RNA-Seq筛选调控马铃薯熟性的候选基因[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(6): 1505-1518. |
| [10] | 李强, 顾丽嫱, 窦雅静, 高永利, 赵玉倩, 陆亚茹, 宋小明. 黄瓜新品种‘多喜一号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(6): 1681-1682. |
| [11] | 袁路明, 朱红菊, 刘文革. 转录因子对园艺作物果肉颜色的调控[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(4): 1051-1064. |
| [12] | 张圣平, 董邵云, 官健涛, 苗晗, 刘小萍, 顾兴芳. 黄瓜抗病分子育种研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(3): 773-791. |
| [13] | 王瑞, 吴红霏, 张长远, 曹海顺, 谭德龙, 郭金菊, 王云龙, 王茹芳, 袁余, 吴廷全. CsPUB54与PmRXLR1互作负向调控黄瓜对疫病的抗性[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(3): 591-602. |
| [14] | 温正阳, 孙靖博, 张梦夏, 张锋, 董春娟. 黄瓜CsCuAO家族基因鉴定及其在不定根形成中的作用研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(2): 309-321. |
| [15] | 毛欣, 元文飞, 郭雨润, 徐欣欣, 李艺, 张毅, 苗妍秀, 白龙强, 李衍素. 日光温室黄瓜有机物料种植板栽培中有机物料腐解及根区和叶片养分含量的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(2): 439-452. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司