不同类型桃种质资源主要酚类物质含量评价

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0138

园艺学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 1008-1022.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0138

不同类型桃种质资源主要酚类物质含量评价

蔡志翔¹, 严娟¹, 宿子文¹, 徐子媛¹, 张明昊², 沈志军¹, 杨军³, 马瑞娟¹, 俞明亮¹^,^*()

¹江苏省农业科学院果树研究所,江苏省高效园艺作物遗传改良重点实验室,南京 210014
²上海市农业科学院林木果树研究所,上海 201403
³江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,南京 210014

收稿日期:2021-11-10 修回日期:2022-01-20 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-05-25
通讯作者: 俞明亮 E-mail:mly1008@aliyun.com
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20200278);国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFD1000200);农业农村部物种保护项目(19210137);国家科技资源共享服务平台项目(NHGRC2021-NH16);江苏省种业揭榜挂帅项目(JBGS（2021）016)

Evaluation of Main Phenolic Compounds in Different Types of Peach Germplasm Resources

CAI Zhixiang¹, YAN Juan¹, SU Ziwen¹, XU Ziyuan¹, ZHANG Minghao², SHEN Zhijun¹, YANG Jun³, MA Ruijuan¹, YU Mingliang¹^,^*()

¹Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement,Institute of Pomology,Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Nanjing 210014,China
²Forest and Fruit Tree Research Institute,Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Shanghai 201403,China
³Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment,Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Nanjing 210014,China

Received:2021-11-10 Revised:2022-01-20 Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-05-25
Contact: YU Mingliang E-mail:mly1008@aliyun.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以257份桃种质成熟期果实为试材,利用高效液相色谱法（HPLC）测定果肉中6种酚类物质和3种有机酸含量,分析比较不同种质果肉单体酚和总酚含量的差异,并讨论不同肉色、肉质和有机酸含量的种质类型间酚类物质的含量差异。结果显示,桃果肉中总酚含量区间为31.05 ~ 919.11 mg · kg^-1 FW,其中绿原酸、新绿原酸、儿茶素含量较高,平均值分别为56.60、43.20和25.79 mg · kg^-1 FW,表儿茶素、芦丁含量中等,平均值分别为14.77和14.85 mg · kg^-1 FW,阿魏酸含量最低（1.57 mg · kg^-1 FW）;筛选到单体酚和总酚含量特异种质11份;不同肉色类型桃的主要酚类物质含量存在差异,红肉类型显著高于白肉和黄肉类型,黄肉与白肉类型差异不大;不同肉质类型桃主要酚类物质含量为硬肉显著高于溶质和硬质类型（P < 0.05）;果实中苹果酸、柠檬酸、奎尼酸含量均与总酚含量呈极显著正相关。

关键词: 桃, 种质资源, 酚类物质, 有机酸, 肉色, 肉质

Abstract:

The contents of six phenolic compounds and three organic acids in pulp of 257 peach germplasms were determined by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography（HPLC）,the mono-phenol and total phenol contents in different germplasms were compared,and their contents in different types of germplasm resources with different pulp color,pulp texture and organic acid content were discussed. The results showed that the contents of total phenol in peach pulp ranged from 31.05 to 919.11 mg · kg^-1 FW,among which the contents of chlorogenic acid,neochlorogenic acid and catechin were highest,the mean values were 56.60,43.20 and 25.79 mg · kg^-1 FW,respectively,the average contents of epicatechin and rutin were 14.77 and 14.85 mg · kg^-1 FW,respectively,and the content of ferulic acid was lowest with 1.57 mg · kg^-1 FW. Eleven special varieties were selected according to the mono-phenol and total phenol contents. In different types of pulp color,the total phenol content in red pulp were significantly higher than those in white and yellow pulp（P < 0.05）,the total phenol content of yellow pulp was no significant difference with white pulp. In different types of pulp texture,the phenolics content of crisp peach were significantly higher than in melting and stony hard peach（P < 0.05）. The total phenol content was significantly correlated with the contents of malic acid,citric acid and quinic acid in pulp.

Key words: peach, germplasm resource, phenolic compounds, organic acid, pulp color, pulp textrue

中图分类号:

S662.1

蔡志翔, 严娟, 宿子文, 徐子媛, 张明昊, 沈志军, 杨军, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮. 不同类型桃种质资源主要酚类物质含量评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(5): 1008-1022.

CAI Zhixiang, YAN Juan, SU Ziwen, XU Ziyuan, ZHANG Minghao, SHEN Zhijun, YANG Jun, MA Ruijuan, YU Mingliang. Evaluation of Main Phenolic Compounds in Different Types of Peach Germplasm Resources[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(5): 1008-1022.

图/表 9

参考文献 40

[1]	Andreotti C, Ravaglia D, Ragaini A, Costa G. 2008. Phenolic compounds in peach (Prunus persica) cultivars at harvest and during fruit maturation. Annals of Applied Biology, 153 (1):11-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00234.x URL
[2]	Aregay N, Belew D, Zenebe A, Grima A, Haile M, Gebresamuel G. 2021. Influences of rootstock and agro-climatic condition on physico-chemical and bioactive compounds of Gunda Gundo orange(Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)in the Northern Ethiopia. Horticultural Plant Journal, 7 (6):509-519. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2021.06.001 URL
[3]	Breslin P A S, Gilmore M M, Beauchamp G K, Green B G. 1993. Psychophysical evidence that oral astringency is a tactile sensation. Chemical Senses, 18 (4):405-417. doi: 10.1093/chemse/18.4.405 URL
[4]	Celia M C, María A M, Gogorcena Y. 2009. Evaluation of the antioxidant capacity,phenolic compounds,and vitamin C content of different peach and nectarine[Prunus persica(L.)Batsch]breeding progenies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57 (11):4586-4592. doi: 10.1021/jf900385a URL
[5]	Cevallos-Casals B A, Byrne D, Okie W R, Cisneros-Zevallos L. 2006. Selecting new peach and plum genotypes rich in phenolic compounds and enhanced functional properties. Food Chemistry, 96 (2):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.032 URL
[6]	Chang S, Tan C, Frankel E N, Barrett D M. 2000. Low-density lipoprotein antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds and polyphenol oxidase activity in selected clingstone peach cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48 (2):147-151. pmid: 10691607
[7]	Dabbou S, Maatallah S, Castagna A, Guizani M, Sghaeir W, Hajlaloui H, Ranieri A. 2016. Carotenoids,phenolic profile,mineral content and antioxidant properties in flesh and peel of Prunus persica fruits during two maturation stages. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 34 (4):1-8.
[8]	Ding T Y, Cao K, Fang W C, Zhu G R, Chen C W, Wang X W, Wang L R. 2020. Evaluation of phenolic components(anthocyanins,flavanols,phenolic acids,and flavonols)and their antioxidant properties of peach fruits. Scientia Horticulturae, 268:109365. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109365 URL
[9]	Gecer M K. 2020. Biochemical content in fruits of peach and nectarine cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 44 (5):500-505. doi: 10.3906/tar-1911-8 URL
[10]	Ghafar A A, Burrell R, Reighard G, Gasic K. 2018. Antioxidant capacity and bioactive compounds accumulation in peach breeding germplasm. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 72 (1):40-69.
[11]	He Jin-yu. 2012. The influence of phenolic compounds on wine quality. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 40 (10):1118-1120. (in Chinese)
	贺晋瑜. 2012. 酚类物质对葡萄酒品质的影响. 山西农业科学, 40 (10):1118-1120.
[12]	Jia H J, Hirano K, Okamoto G. 1999. Effect of fertlizer levels ontree growth and fruit quality of Hakuho peaches(Prunus persica). Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 68 (3):487-493.
[13]	Jiao W X, Li X X, Wang X M, Cao J K, Jiang W B. 2018. Chlorogenic acid- induces resistance against,Penicillium expansum,in peach fruit by activating the salicylic acid signaling pathway. Food Chemistry, 260:274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.010 URL
[14]	Jiri S, Ondrej Z, Helena S, Dusan P, Petr B, Boris K, Ales H, Vojtech A, Ivo P, Rene K. 2010. Content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in fruits of apricot genotypes. Molecules, 15 (9):6285-6305. doi: 10.3390/molecules15096285 URL
[15]	Kalt W, Ryan D A J, Duy J C, Prior R L, Ehlenfeldt M K, Kloet S P V. 2001. Interspecific variation in anthocyanins,henolics,and antioxidant capacity among genotypes of highbush and lowbush blueberries(Vaccinium section cyanococcus spp.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49 (10):4761-4767. pmid: 11600018
[16]	Kris-Etherton P M, Hecker K D, Bonanome A, Coval S M, Etherton T D. 2002. Bioactive compounds in foods:their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. American Journal of Medicine, 113 (Suppl 9B):71-88. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00995-0 URL
[17]	Kusvuran S. 2021. Microalgae(Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck)alleviates drought stress of broccoli plants by improving nutrient uptake,secondary metabolites,and antioxidative defense system. Horticultural Plant Journal, 7 (3):221-231. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2021.03.007 URL
[18]	Leontowicz H, Gorinstein S, Lojek A, Leontowicz M, Milan, Soliva-Fortuny R, Park Y S, Jung S T, Trakhtenberg S, Martin-Belloso O. 2002. Comparative content of some bioactive compounds in apples,peaches and pears and their influence on lipids and antioxidant capacity in rats. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 13 (10):603-610. pmid: 12550072
[19]	Liao X X, Phillip G, Ronald B P. 2019. Characterizing the phenolic constituents and antioxidant capacity of Georgia peaches. Food Chemistry, 271:345-353. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.163 URL
[20]	Liu H, Jiang W B, Cao J K, Ma L. 2018. Evaluation of antioxidant properties of extractable and nonextractable polyphenols in peel and flesh tissue of different peach varieties. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 42 (6):e13624. 1-e13624. 9. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.13624 URL
[21]	Lu Juan-fang, Liu Sheng-yu, Lu Wang, Xi Wan-peng. 2017. Phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of fruit pulp from different types of peaches. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 50 (16):3205-3214. (in Chinese)
	卢娟芳, 刘盛雨, 芦旺, 席万鹏. 2017. 不同类型桃果肉酚类物质及抗氧化活性分析. 中国农业科学, 50 (16):3205-3214.
[22]	María I G, Francisco A, Hess Pierce B, Kader A A. 2002. Antioxidant capacities,phenolic compounds,carotenoids,and vitamin C contents of nectarine,peach,and plum cultivars from California. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50 (17):4976-4982. pmid: 12166993
[23]	Narita Y, Inouye K. 2013. Degradation kinetics of chlorogenic acid at various ph values and effects of ascorbic acid and epigallocatechin gallate on its stability under alkaline conditions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61 (4):966-972. doi: 10.1021/jf304105w URL
[24]	Niu Jing, Zhao Jian-bo, Wu Ben-hong, Li Shao-hua, Liu Guo-jie, Jiang Quan. 2006. Sugar and acid contents in peach and nectarine derived from different countries and species. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 33 (1):6-11. (in Chinese)
	牛景, 赵剑波, 吴本宏, 李少华, 刘国杰, 姜全. 2006. 不同来源桃种质果实糖酸组分含量特点的研究. 园艺学报, 33 (1):6-11.
[25]	Obi V I, Barriuso J J, Usall J, Gogorcena Y. 2019. Breeding strategies for identifying superior peach genotypes resistant to brown rot. Scientia Horticulturae, 246:1028-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.027 URL
[26]	Saidani F, Giménez R, Aubert C, Chalot G, Betran J A, Gogorcena Y. 2017. Phenolic,ugar and acid profiles and the antioxidant composition in the peel and pulp of peach fruits. Journal of Food Composition & Analysis, 62:126-133.
[27]	Schwarz B, Hofmann T. 2008. Is there a direct relationship between oral astringency and human salivary protein binding. European Food Research and Technology, 227 (6):1693-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00217-008-0895-x URL
[28]	Serra S, Anthony B, Masia A, Giovannini D, Musacchi S. 2020. Determination of biochemical composition in peach(Prunus persica L. Batsch)accessions characterized by different flesh color and textural typologies. Foods, 9 (10):1452. doi: 10.3390/foods9101452 URL
[29]	Shen Zhi-jun, Ma Rui-juan, Yu Ming-liang, Cai Zhi-xiang, Song Hong-feng, Li Xiao. 2007. Regularity analysis of main sugar and acid in fruit development of peach. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 22 (6):130-134. (in Chinese)
	沈志军, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮, 蔡志翔, 宋宏峰, 李晓. 2007. 桃果实发育过程中主要糖及有机酸含量的变化分析. 华北农学报, 22 (6):130-134.
[30]	Shen Zhi-jun, Ma Rui-juan, Yu Ming-liang, Xu Jian-lan, Cai Zhi-xiang, Ni Lin-jian, Yan Shao-bin. 2012. Evaluation of antioxidant factors in peach with three types of flesh color. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 45 (11):2232-2241. (in Chinese)
	沈志军, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮, 许建兰, 蔡志翔, 倪林箭, 颜少宾. 2012. 桃三种肉色类型果实抗氧化因子的比较评价. 中国农业科学, 45 (11):2232-2241.
[31]	Shi Hongmei, Zhang Zhengwen, Wang Zhe, Han Xiaomei, Wang Yongmei, Ren Fengshan, Gong Lei. 2020. Comparative analysis on phenolic compounds among different clones of Vitis vinifera‘Cabernet Franc’. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (8):1541-1551. (in Chinese)
	史红梅, 张正文, 王哲, 韩晓梅, 王咏梅, 任凤山, 宫磊. 2020. ‘品丽珠’葡萄不同营养系酚类物质差异分析. 园艺学报, 47 (8):1541-1551.
[32]	Trugo L C, Macrae R. 1984. Chlorogenic acid composition of instant coffees. Analyst, 109 (3):263-266. pmid: 6721155
[33]	Vinson J A, Su X, Zubik L, Bose P. 2001. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods:fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49 (11):5315-5321. pmid: 11714322
[34]	Wang Li-rong, Zhu Geng-rui. 2005. Descriptors and data standard for peach(Prunus persica L.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press:56-60. (in Chinese)
	王力荣, 朱更瑞. 2005. 桃种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社:56-60.
[35]	Wang Zu-hua, Lu Zhen-xiang, Lu Xiu-hua. 1990. Study on the evolution and classification of peach varieties through isozyme analysis. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,(4):241-248. (in Chinese)
	汪祖华, 陆振翔, 陆秀华. 1990. 桃品种演化及分类研究-同工酶分析. 园艺学报,(4):241-248.
[36]	Wang Zu-hua, Zhou Jian-tao. 1990. Pollen morphology of peach germplasm. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,(3):161-168,241-244,247. (in Chinese)
	汪祖华, 周建涛. 1990. 桃种质的亲缘演化关系研究——花粉形态分析. 园艺学报,(3):161-168,241-244,247.
[37]	Wang Zu-hua, Zhuang En-ji. 2001. Chinese fruit tree annals. Peach. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House:74-89. (in Chinese)
	汪祖华, 庄恩及. 2001. 中国果树志 · 桃卷. 北京: 中国林业出版社:74-89.
[38]	Yan Juan, Cai Zhi-xiang, Shen Zhi-jun, Zhang Bin-bin, Qian Wei, Yu Ming-liang. 2014. Determination and comparison of 10 phenolic compounds in peach with three types of flesh color. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 41 (2):319-328. (in Chinese)
	严娟, 蔡志翔, 沈志军, 张斌斌, 钱巍, 俞明亮. 2014. 桃3种颜色果肉中10种酚类物质的测定及比较. 园艺学报, 41 (2):319-328.
[39]	Zhang Binbin, Shen Zhijun, Ma Ruijuan, Jiang Hang, Yan Juan, Yu Mingliang. 2018. Antioxidant capacity evaluation of peach fruit based on flesh individual phenol and total phenol content. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 45 (5):121-132. (in Chinese)
	张斌斌, 沈志军, 马瑞娟, 江航, 严娟, 俞明亮. 2018. 基于果肉单体酚和总酚含量评价桃果实抗氧化能力. 园艺学报, 45 (5):121-132.
[40]	Zhao Yu, Wang Li-rong, Cao Ke, Zhu Geng-rui, Fang Wei-chao, Chen Chang-wen, Peng Fu-tian. 2013. Genetic diversity of anthocyanin in peach fruit and the evaluating criterion of red-flesh peach. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 14 (1):167-172. (in Chinese)
	赵玉, 王力荣, 曹珂, 朱更瑞, 方伟超, 陈昌文, 彭福田. 2013. 桃果肉花色苷遗传多样性及红肉桃判定指标的探讨. 植物遗传资源学报, 14 (1):167-172.

酚类 Phenolic compounds	含量/（mg · kg^-1 FW）Content					变异系数/% Coefficient of variation
酚类 Phenolic compounds	平均值 Average	中位数 Median	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum	标准差 Standard deviation	变异系数/% Coefficient of variation
新绿原酸 Neochlorogenic acid	43.20	34.61	1.05	446.49	40.06	92.75
儿茶素 Catechin	25.79	21.43	2.87	109.39	16.96	65.78
绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid	56.60	49.32	1.01	363.11	42.45	74.99
表儿茶素 Epicatechin	14.77	13.64	0	47.06	5.69	38.52
芦丁 Rutin	14.85	10.36	3.84	60.31	11.57	77.87
阿魏酸 Ferulic acid	1.57	1.47	0.53	4.03	0.65	41.26
总酚 Total phenol	155.21	134.83	31.05	919.11	91.78	59.13

酚类 Phenolic compounds	含量/（mg · kg^-1 FW）Content					变异系数/% Coefficient of variation
酚类 Phenolic compounds	平均值 Average	中位数 Median	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum	标准差 Standard deviation	变异系数/% Coefficient of variation
新绿原酸 Neochlorogenic acid	43.20	34.61	1.05	446.49	40.06	92.75
儿茶素 Catechin	25.79	21.43	2.87	109.39	16.96	65.78
绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid	56.60	49.32	1.01	363.11	42.45	74.99
表儿茶素 Epicatechin	14.77	13.64	0	47.06	5.69	38.52
芦丁 Rutin	14.85	10.36	3.84	60.31	11.57	77.87
阿魏酸 Ferulic acid	1.57	1.47	0.53	4.03	0.65	41.26
总酚 Total phenol	155.21	134.83	31.05	919.11	91.78	59.13

类型 Type	种质名称 Germplasm name	年份 Year
类型 Type	种质名称 Germplasm name	2019	2020
低酚类型	瑞蟠2号Ruipan 2	35.67	52.34
Low total phenol content type	早魁蜜 Zaokuimi	61.72	27.39
	霞晖5号 Xiahui 5	68.11	50.44
	小红花 Xiaohonghua	70.72	78.87
	接桃 Jietao	79.31	62.14
高酚类型	北京一线红Beijing Yixianhong	376.40	547.90
High total phenol content type	半斤桃 Banjintao	425.95	388.76
	紫油桃7号 Ziyoutao 7	427.84	606.22
	红桃 Hongtao	452.97	435.33
	燕窝红 Yanwohong	919.11	450.81

类型 Type	种质名称 Germplasm name	年份 Year
类型 Type	种质名称 Germplasm name	2019	2020
低酚类型	瑞蟠2号Ruipan 2	35.67	52.34
Low total phenol content type	早魁蜜 Zaokuimi	61.72	27.39
	霞晖5号 Xiahui 5	68.11	50.44
	小红花 Xiaohonghua	70.72	78.87
	接桃 Jietao	79.31	62.14
高酚类型	北京一线红Beijing Yixianhong	376.40	547.90
High total phenol content type	半斤桃 Banjintao	425.95	388.76
	紫油桃7号 Ziyoutao 7	427.84	606.22
	红桃 Hongtao	452.97	435.33
	燕窝红 Yanwohong	919.11	450.81

种质 Germplasm	新绿原酸 Neochlorogenic acid		绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid		儿茶素 Catechin
种质 Germplasm	2019	2020	2019	2020	2019	2020
瑞蟠2号 Ruipan 2	14.23	20.24	3.30	10.10	9.21	10.98
Tropicprince	8.56	2.54	16.66	10.51	44.95	40.89
半斤桃 Banjintao	22.40	45.30	225.35	175.03	93.05	80.52
红桃 Hongtao	81.36	39.80	221.64	150.38	44.27	23.29
北京一线红 Beijing Yixianhong	98.32	122.46	160.61	304.80	91.58	48.61
燕窝红 Yanwohong	446.49	219.08	363.11	156.78	84.55	50.32

不同类型桃种质资源主要酚类物质含量评价

Evaluation of Main Phenolic Compounds in Different Types of Peach Germplasm Resources

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数:

肉色 Pulp color	肉质 Pulp texture	品种群 Variety group	编号 No.	品种名称 Name	总酚/（mg · kg^-1 FW） Total phenolic	总酸/（g · kg^-1FW） Total acid
白 White	溶质 Melting	黄桃品种群 Yellow pulp group	1	Valley Gem	179.89	8.75
		蜜桃品种群	2	深州水蜜 Shenzhou Shuimi	205.63	11.41
		Mitao group	3	渭南甜桃 Weinan Tiantao	188.39	5.64
		蟠桃品种群	4	124蟠桃 124 Pantao	167.55	6.13
		Flat group	5	American Flat Peach	145.06	2.92
			6	American Red Flat Peach	86.13	5.34
			7	Galaxy	143.66	8.67
			8	Saturn	130.18	3.01
			9	UFO4	69.91	8.37
			10	白芒蟠桃 Baimang Pantao	195.64	6.74
			11	白蜜蟠桃 Baimi Pantao	52.83	9.87
			12	陈圃蟠桃 Chenpu Pantao	265.44	6.66
			13	奉化蟠桃 Fenghua Pantao	179.48	4.89
			14	黄露蟠桃 Huanglu Pantao	102.09	5.38
			15	离核蟠桃 Lihe Pantao	156.42	3.33
			16	瑞蟠1号 Ruipan 1	140.89	4.08
			17	瑞蟠2号 Ruipan 2	35.67	8.26
			18	瑞蟠5号 Ruipan 5	126.57	6.93
			19	撒花红蟠桃 Sahua Hongpantao	201.07	4.46
			20	晚熟大蟠桃 Wanshu Dapantao	154.65	5.57
			21	西山蟠桃 Xishan Pantao	244.09	6.27
			22	玉露蟠桃 Yulu Pantao	115.77	5.51
			23	早魁蜜 Zaokuimi	61.72	6.87
			24	早露蟠桃 Zaolu Pantao	231.51	5.97
			25	长生蟠桃 Changsheng Pantao	190.33	6.62
		水蜜桃品种群	26	62-43	164.82	6.04
		Shuimitao	27	63-14-14	129.63	5.30
		group	28	63-18-4	159.51	4.44
			29	99-13-9	97.48	4.86
			30	Amsden June	172.80	10.72
			31	Brazil 6	132.86	4.01
			32	Chula	91.34	5.01
			33	ICE	64.60	6.31
			34	Maravilha	58.92	15.94
			35	Robin	149.71	5.63
			36	Spring Honey	258.92	7.77
			37	阿部白桃 Abe Hakuto	104.17	5.32
			38	安农水蜜 Annong Shuimi	94.56	4.14
			39	白凤2号 Baifeng 2	92.85	5.49
			40	白花水蜜 Baihua Shuimi	77.91	4.37
			41	白桃 Hakuto	79.78	4.75
			42	白香露 Baixianglu	114.50	5.04
			43	北农1号 Beinong 1	174.54	6.91
			44	北农2号 Beinong 2	120.17	3.69
			45	布雷顶峰 Feavourtop	133.93	11.83
			46	仓方早生 Kurakatowase	172.82	3.06
			47	常州白花 Changzhou Baihua	128.96	5.24
			48	朝晖 Zhaohui	129.95	4.81
肉色 Pulp color	肉质 Pulp texture	品种群 Variety group	编号 No.	品种名称 Name	总酚/（mg · kg^-1 FW） Total phenolic	总酸/（g · kg^-1FW） Total acid
			49	朝霞 Zhaoxia	79.24	5.99
			50	赤玉 Akadama	133.63	4.86
			51	川中岛白桃Kawanakajima Hakutou	156.90	4.99
			52	传十郎 Denjyoro	160.65	9.76
			53	脆保 Cuibao	234.70	10.26
			54	大和早生 Yamato Wase	207.28	10.57
			55	大团蜜露 Datun Milu	160.65	5.00
			56	大玉白凤 Odama Hakuho	142.43	4.46
			57	大珍宝赤月 Daihonpo Akatsuki	135.50	4.40
			58	点花白凤 Dianhua Baifeng	98.23	5.29
			59	都白凤 Miyako Haku	188.66	5.80
			60	丰白 Fengbai	85.46	6.35
			61	凤露 Fenglu	88.07	5.85
			62	奉化玉露 Fenghua Yulu	272.67	5.38
			63	奉化玉露（早）Fenghua Yulu（Zao）	122.31	4.61
			64	福岛大玉白凤 Fukushima Daiho Hakuho	127.86	4.90
			65	甘选2号 Ganxuan 2	129.18	6.18
			66	甘选4号 Ganxuan 4	98.31	4.33
			67	冈山白 Hakuyo	75.49	5.80
			68	红博桃 Beni Hakuto	112.64	7.75
			69	红不软 Hongburuan	110.87	5.64
			70	红甘露 Hongganlu	55.58	3.92
			71	红清水 Beni Shimizu	112.55	5.46
			72	湖景蜜露 Hujing Milu	93.41	9.17
			73	晖雨露 Huiyulu	97.31	4.38
			74	江津IV-2-9 Jiangjin IV-2-9	201.87	7.20
			75	金久红 Jinjiuhong	223.85	5.51
			76	京春 Jingchun	107.09	5.42
			77	京唐晚蜜 Jingtang Wanmi	76.18	6.04
			78	桔早生 Tachibana Wase	149.81	6.07
			79	莱山蜜 Laishanmi	142.50	4.24
			80	良姬 Yoshihime	140.94	6.04
			81	良媛 Ryohime	105.54	4.77
			82	嶺凤 Reihou	112.00	4.24
			83	龙华水蜜 Longhua Shuimi	155.98	4.59
			84	麦香 Maixiang	167.82	10.84
			85	美夏 Meixia	192.33	15.44
			86	穆阳桃 Muyangtao	170.34	3.54
			87	农林89号 Tsukuba 89	125.42	6.12
			88	农林90号 Tsukuba 90	127.68	5.11
			89	皮球桃 Piqiutao	100.89	5.60
			90	屏边毛桃4号 Pinbian Maotao 4	78.04	2.87
			91	千斤子 Qianjinzi	170.78	4.69
			92	青皮秋桃 Qingpi Qiutao	81.31	4.65
			93	庆丰 Qinfeng	120.08	9.31
			94	日本86 Tsukuba 86	111.14	11.08
			95	日本白桃 Tsukuba Hakuto	140.07	6.28
			96	日川白凤 Hikawa Hakuhou	106.93	5.34
			97	润州水蜜 Runzhou Shuimi	84.82	6.49
			98	砂激2号 Shaji 2	114.81	4.11
			99	砂子早生 Sunago Wase	138.99	4.38
			100	酥红 Suhong	198.99	8.03
			101	唐行白花 Baihua（Tanghang）	130.40	6.21
			102	天津水蜜 Tianjin Shuimi	132.05	6.13
			103	晚红蜜 Wanhongmi	141.92	7.68
			104	晚湖景Wanhujing	152.62	3.78
			105	晚良媛 Iryohime	117.21	4.85
			106	夕空 Evening Sky	46.56	5.46
肉色 Pulp color	肉质 Pulp texture	品种群 Variety group	编号 No.	品种名称 Name	总酚/（mg · kg^-1 FW） Total phenolic	总酸/（g · kg^-1FW） Total acid
			107	西圃大玉露 Xipu Dayulu	330.13	6.60
			108	锡蜜 Ximi	180.36	7.75
			109	霞晖5号 Xiahui 5	68.11	2.61
			110	霞晖6号 Xiahui 6	127.27	6.16
			111	霞晖7号 Xiahui 7	78.42	4.80
			112	霞晖8号 Xiahui 8	78.06	3.91
			113	夏乙女 Natsuotome	66.51	3.67
			114	小红花 Xiaohonghua	70.72	4.71
			115	新白凤 Xin Baifeng	92.51	6.42
			116	新大久保 Shinokubo	108.41	6.31
			117	燕红 Yanhong	108.88	4.76
			118	燕窝红 Yanwohong	919.11	14.69
			119	阳山1号 Yangshan 1	64.77	4.99
			120	阳山2号 Yangshan 2	104.12	4.80
			121	阳山桃 Yangshantao	218.12	5.33
			122	杨桃97 Yangtao 97	77.84	5.14
			123	银花露 Yinhualu	87.66	5.83
			124	银星 Silver Star	183.40	9.50
			125	羽衣 Hakoromo	148.43	12.51
			126	玉汉 OK Chin	176.56	9.56
			127	早白凤79 Zaobaifen 79	133.90	4.02
			128	早白花 Zaobaihua	90.00	5.46
			129	早凤王 Zaofengwang	199.52	5.59
			130	早红露 Zaohonglu	55.71	4.72
			131	早上海水蜜 Early Chinese Cling	224.13	8.91
			132	早乙女 Saotome	111.22	4.57
			133	长引1号 Changyin 1	80.38	3.54
			134	正姬 Masamitsu	99.74	4.80
			135	中湖景 Zhonghujing	121.81	4.81
			136	重阳红 Chongyanghong	155.24	6.76
		油桃品种群	137	Early Red 2	152.97	11.57
		Nectarine group	138	French Nectarine	152.02	18.13
			139	Nectared 6	143.44	6.71
			140	沪油004 Huyou 004	93.46	6.25
			141	沪油007 Huyou 007	91.72	4.50
			142	华光 Huaguang	102.41	6.29
			143	美婷 Meiting	178.04	5.80
			144	美引15 Meiyin 15	165.38	13.41
			145	云龙桃 Yunlongtao	515.54	18.48
			146	中油14号 Zhongyou 14	114.07	5.89
			147	中油20号 Zhongyou 20	67.42	5.88
	硬肉	硬肉桃品种群	148	半旱 Banhan	382.79	8.49
	Crisp	Crisp group	149	泸水桃 Lushuitao	171.34	9.98
			150	平碑子 Pingbeizi	134.83	6.66
			151	扬州早甜桃 Yangzhou Zaotiantao	164.67	6.73
	硬质	水蜜桃品种群	152	华玉 Huayu	78.61	6.70
	Stony	Shuimitao group	153	秦王 Qinwang	96.97	5.58
	hard		154	霞脆 Xiacui	123.85	4.10
			155	有名白桃 Yumyeoung	129.06	7.08
红	硬肉	硬肉桃品种群	156	GYT026	382.18	10.86
Red	Crisp	Crisp group	157	红肉138 Hongrou 138	156.87	21.92
			158	半斤桃 Banjintao	425.95	20.37
			159	北京一线红 Beijing Yixianhong	376.40	33.61
			160	大红袍-新 Xin Dahongpao	301.98	14.21
			161	红肉桃1号 Hongroutao 1	124.41	6.71
			162	红肉桃2号 Hongroutao 2	188.01	7.99
			163	红桃 Hongtao	452.97	15.79
			164	接桃 Jietao	79.31	11.24
			165	丽江桃 Lijiangtao	167.27	8.19
肉色 Pulp color	肉质 Pulp texture	品种群 Variety group	编号 No.	品种名称 Name	总酚/（mg · kg^-1 FW） Total phenolic	总酸/（g · kg^-1FW） Total acid
			166	芒种露 Mangzhonglu	250.82	18.30
			167	曲靖甜桃 Qujin Tiantao	49.04	11.74
			168	神农红肉 Shennong Hongrou	194.34	6.09
			169	天津水蜜 Tianjin Shuimi	116.70	13.68
			170	咸阳红肉 Xianyang Hongrou	378.18	14.44
			171	小红袍 Xiaohongpao	223.88	4.37
			172	孝感LZ Xiaogan LZ	121.72	8.65
			173	杨店迟 Yangdianchi	271.14	12.61
			174	硬肉桃5 Yingroutao 5	100.42	7.43
			175	云南桃41号 Yunnan 41	221.00	7.06
			176	云南桃54号 Yunann 54	143.16	8.13
			177	猪血红 Zhuxuehong	176.47	5.74
		油桃品种群 Nectarine group	178	紫油桃7号 Ziyoutao 7	427.84	10.11
黄	不溶质	黄桃品种群	179	Baby Gold 6	208.36	11.12
Yellow	Non-	Yellow pulp group	180	Baby Gold 7	125.92	5.93
	melting		181	Baby Gold 8	356.94	9.17
			182	Crimsonbaby	134.15	17.02
			183	Dixon	160.46	11.34
			184	Early Crawford	116.71	9.01
			185	Fortuna	124.20	7.29
			186	Frederica	152.50	8.32
			187	Lisbeth	103.25	11.46
			188	Rumiana	186.85	9.92
			189	Suncling	166.29	7.16
			190	Tropicprince	88.51	11.45
			191	Troubador	111.96	8.02
			192	Tuscan	136.58	8.22
			193	TX4F244C	128.82	18.02
			194	Vesuvio	181.03	9.48
			195	丰罐2号 Fengguan 2	192.41	6.16
			196	奉罐1号 Fengguan 1	139.63	11.64
			197	罐桃14号 Kanto 14	163.20	12.69
			198	罐桃5号 Kanto 5	264.50	8.68
			199	黄粘核 Hunagnianhe	422.71	9.59
			200	金旭 Jinxu	292.60	7.20
			201	菊黄 Juhuang	265.60	3.68
			202	明星 Myojyo	166.28	11.73
	溶质	黄桃品种群	203	Babiole	136.97	10.49
	Melting	Yellow pulp group	204	Carona	159.62	11.71
			205	Compact Roman	194.03	8.31
			206	Cullinan	202.48	11.26
			207	Elberta	208.91	9.13
			208	Fantasia	203.51	13.54
			209	Favolate 3	117.54	10.40
			210	Fertini Morettini	114.32	9.86
			211	Flame Prince	237.77	11.01
			212	German Gold	244.84	6.76
			213	Harken	90.19	7.76
			214	Marigold	129.75	5.95
			215	Nectaross	120.92	12.31
			216	Quetta	69.16	14.13
			217	Redhaven	83.34	9.02
			218	Redtop	94.11	5.56
			219	Spring Crest	132.35	11.43
			220	Triumph	125.39	4.83
			221	TX4D170	49.64	19.18
			222	TX4E169	51.75	11.41
			223	昌黎黄肉 Changli Huangrou	332.70	8.95
肉色 Pulp color	肉质 Pulp texture	品种群 Variety group	编号 No.	品种名称 Name	总酚/（mg · kg^-1 FW） Total phenolic	总酸/（g · kg^-1FW） Total acid
			224	大赵黄桃 Dazhao Huangtao	159.20	4.88
			225	黄金美丽 NJ271	453.04	5.10
			226	金橙 Jincheng	231.82	11.56
			227	金丰 Jinfeng	155.02	7.83
			228	金陵黄露 Jinling Huanglu	117.69	6.31
			229	金艳 Jinyan	169.52	10.23
			230	金莹 Jinying	144.26	9.34
			231	锦园 Jinyuan	126.88	4.20
			232	立夏红 Lixiahong	69.12	5.52
			233	西安杏瓤桃 Xi^,an Xingrangtao	141.21	5.82
			234	早金露 Zaojinlu	129.69	5.96
			235	浙金2号 Zhejin 2	201.17	9.46
		蟠桃品种群	236	金霞蟠桃 Jinxia Pantao	187.28	6.18
		Flat group	237	早黄蟠桃 Zaohuang Pantao	145.24	6.06
			238	紫金早油蟠 Zijin Zaoyoupan	107.67	9.28
		油桃品种群	239	Flordacrest	177.40	20.46
		Nectarine group	240	Flordaglo	111.85	21.38
			241	Flordarking	164.81	17.85
			242	Independence	136.08	10.25
			243	Mayfire	94.70	8.89
			244	NJN70	145.80	24.71
			245	NJN76	116.19	8.95
			246	Pegaso	205.26	13.95
			247	Starkdelicious	159.83	10.67
			248	Sunfre	221.44	15.64
			249	Sunking	111.21	11.79
			250	TX2B7N	167.99	12.76
			251	TX2C104N	258.15	17.66
			252	TX4C199	45.02	5.50
			253	早丰甜 Zaofengtian	83.58	9.36
			254	早花油桃 Zaohua Youtao	176.27	14.56
			255	紫金红1号 Zijinhong 1	32.05	13.03
			256	紫金红2号 Zijinhong 2	77.72	2.75
			257	紫金红3号 Zijinhong 3	104.49	8.64

组分 Component	总酚 Total phenol	总酸 Total acid	奎尼酸 Quinic acid	苹果酸 Malic acid	柠檬酸 Citric acid
总酚 Total phenol	1
总酸 Total acid	0.46^**	1
奎尼酸 Quinic acid	0.21^**	0.66^**	1
苹果酸 Malic acid	0.52^**	0.81^**	0.30^**	1
柠檬酸 Citric acid	0.28^*	0.81^**	0.35^**	0.46^**	1

[1]	翟含含, 翟宇杰, 田义, 张叶, 杨丽, 温陟良, 陈海江. 桃SAUR家族基因分析及PpSAUR5功能鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 1-14.
[2]	袁馨, 徐云鹤, 张雨培, 单楠, 陈楚英, 万春鹏, 开文斌, 翟夏琬, 陈金印, 甘增宇. 猕猴桃后熟过程中ABA响应结合因子AcAREB1调控AcGH3.1的表达[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 53-64.
[3]	邢柱东, 吕福堂, 郭尚敬, 张演义. 新品种‘聊大红金’桃[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 225-226.
[4]	杨兴旺, 王海波, 王莹莹, 王小龙, 王志强, 刘培培, 刘万春, 王孝娣. 中熟抗寒桃新品种‘中农甘爽’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 15-16.
[5]	杨兴旺, 王海波, 王莹莹, 张艺灿, 王宝亮, 刘培培, 史祥宾, 刘万春, 王孝娣. 中熟抗寒桃新品种‘中农白干’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 17-18.
[6]	杨兴旺, 刘凤之, 王海波, 王莹莹, 王志强, 史祥宾, 冀晓昊, 刘万春, 王孝娣. 中熟抗寒桃新品种‘中农寒水蜜’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 19-20.
[7]	杨兴旺, 刘凤之, 王海波, 王莹莹, 张艺灿, 李鹏, 王小龙, 刘万春, 王孝娣. 晚熟抗寒桃新品种‘中农秋香’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 21-22.
[8]	王莹莹, 刘立常, 刘志伍, 杨兴旺, 刘万春, 王孝娣, . 极晚熟桃新品种‘中农冬蜜’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 23-24.
[9]	王莹莹, 刘立常, 刘志伍, 杨兴旺, 刘万春, 王孝娣, . 小果油桃新品种‘中农珍珠’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 25-26.
[10]	吴延军, 刘庆忠, 陈鸿才, 戚行江, 朱东姿, 郑家祥, 曹学敏, 方丹燕. 甜樱桃新品种‘江南锦’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 29-30.
[11]	张晓明, 闫国华, 周宇, 王晶, 段续伟, 吴传宝, 张开春. 甜樱桃砧木新品种‘京春2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 31-32.
[12]	宋放, 陈奇, 袁炎良, 陈沙, 尹海军, 蒋迎春, . 黄肉猕猴桃新品种‘先沃1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 47-48.
[13]	齐永杰, 高正辉, 马娜, 王清明, 柯凡君, 陈钱, 徐义流, . 黄肉抗溃疡病猕猴桃新品种‘皖农金果’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 49-50.
[14]	张慧琴, 楼国荣, 陆玲鸿, 古咸彬, 宋根华, 谢鸣. 黄肉中华猕猴桃新品种‘金义’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 51-52.
[15]	季琳琳, 陈素传, 吴志辉, 常君, 韩文妍, 陶汝鹏. 早花山核桃新品种‘宁国山核桃2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 53-54.

不同类型桃种质资源主要酚类物质含量评价

Evaluation of Main Phenolic Compounds in Different Types of Peach Germplasm Resources

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数: 当日访问总数: 当前在线人数:

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数: