Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 1870-1882.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0518
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
YE Yanran1,2, LIU Jiangang1, BIAN Chunsong1, GUO Huachun2,*(), and JIN Liping1,*(
)
Received:
2024-09-05
Revised:
2025-04-01
Online:
2025-07-23
Published:
2025-07-23
Contact:
GUO Huachun, and JIN Liping
YE Yanran, LIU Jiangang, BIAN Chunsong, GUO Huachun, and JIN Liping. Quantitative Analysis of Potato Growth Under Different Nitrogen Management Practices Based on UAV-Acquired RGB Imagery[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(7): 1870-1882.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0518
Fig. 1 Fitted curve of potato canopy dynamics Adapted from Khan et al.(2012). t1:Initial time of CCmax;t2:Canopy senescence onset;te:End of growth period;CCmax:Maximum canopy cover
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 2022 | 2023 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | 块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | ||
夏波蒂 Shepody | N0 | 33.38 ± 1.97 ab | 46.09 ± 1.37 cd | 41.50 ± 2.18 c | 29.42 ± 0.55 c | 50.00 ± 1.80 e | 51.75 ± 1.59 de |
N1 | 33.21 ± 2.63 abc | 43.63 ± 2.00 cd | 38.58 ± 1.30 c | 30.33 ± 0.68 bc | 50.92 ± 2.14 e | 53.83 ± 3.85 de | |
N2 | 32.92 ± 0.95 abc | 45.29 ± 1.76 cd | 41.37 ± 1.76 c | 31.50 ± 0.88 abc | 51.92 ± 1.66 e | 56.00 ± 1.30 de | |
N3 | 35.75 ± 2.19 a | 43.50 ± 2.47 cd | 32.34 ± 2.61 d | 34.09 ± 1.43 ab | 54.92 ± 0.76 de | 53.67 ± 2.17 de | |
N4 | 32.08 ± 1.49 abc | 40.50 ± 2.07 d | 31.75 ± 0.63 d | 31.25 ± 1.53 abc | 51.08 ± 0.96 e | 49.25 ± 1.50 e | |
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | N0 | 25.55 ± 1.46 d | 49.42 ± 2.68 bc | 53.29 ± 1.57 b | 29.08 ± 0.37 c | 52.25 ± 3.27 e | 58.00 ± 3.09 cd |
N1 | 24.50 ± 0.33 d | 45.29 ± 2.76 cd | 50.09 ± 2.19 b | 29.58 ± 1.42 c | 57.92 ± 3.06 cd | 64.50 ± 4.11 c | |
N2 | 28.88 ± 1.99 bcd | 49.92 ± 2.84 abc | 53.33 ± 2.81 b | 31.33 ± 1.16 abc | 61.83 ± 2.32 bc | 71.83 ± 3.69 b | |
N3 | 27.04 ± 0.45 cd | 53.46 ± 1.42 ab | 61.59 ± 0.70 a | 32.92 ± 1.93 abc | 68.75 ± 1.85 a | 84.25 ± 0.80 a | |
N4 | 28.62 ± 3.79 bcd | 56.08 ± 2.17 a | 62.00 ± 2.88 a | 34.42 ± 0.42 a | 66.67 ± 1.59 ab | 84.92 ± 1.74 a |
Table 1 Measured plant height of potatoes at key growth stages cm
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 2022 | 2023 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | 块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | ||
夏波蒂 Shepody | N0 | 33.38 ± 1.97 ab | 46.09 ± 1.37 cd | 41.50 ± 2.18 c | 29.42 ± 0.55 c | 50.00 ± 1.80 e | 51.75 ± 1.59 de |
N1 | 33.21 ± 2.63 abc | 43.63 ± 2.00 cd | 38.58 ± 1.30 c | 30.33 ± 0.68 bc | 50.92 ± 2.14 e | 53.83 ± 3.85 de | |
N2 | 32.92 ± 0.95 abc | 45.29 ± 1.76 cd | 41.37 ± 1.76 c | 31.50 ± 0.88 abc | 51.92 ± 1.66 e | 56.00 ± 1.30 de | |
N3 | 35.75 ± 2.19 a | 43.50 ± 2.47 cd | 32.34 ± 2.61 d | 34.09 ± 1.43 ab | 54.92 ± 0.76 de | 53.67 ± 2.17 de | |
N4 | 32.08 ± 1.49 abc | 40.50 ± 2.07 d | 31.75 ± 0.63 d | 31.25 ± 1.53 abc | 51.08 ± 0.96 e | 49.25 ± 1.50 e | |
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | N0 | 25.55 ± 1.46 d | 49.42 ± 2.68 bc | 53.29 ± 1.57 b | 29.08 ± 0.37 c | 52.25 ± 3.27 e | 58.00 ± 3.09 cd |
N1 | 24.50 ± 0.33 d | 45.29 ± 2.76 cd | 50.09 ± 2.19 b | 29.58 ± 1.42 c | 57.92 ± 3.06 cd | 64.50 ± 4.11 c | |
N2 | 28.88 ± 1.99 bcd | 49.92 ± 2.84 abc | 53.33 ± 2.81 b | 31.33 ± 1.16 abc | 61.83 ± 2.32 bc | 71.83 ± 3.69 b | |
N3 | 27.04 ± 0.45 cd | 53.46 ± 1.42 ab | 61.59 ± 0.70 a | 32.92 ± 1.93 abc | 68.75 ± 1.85 a | 84.25 ± 0.80 a | |
N4 | 28.62 ± 3.79 bcd | 56.08 ± 2.17 a | 62.00 ± 2.88 a | 34.42 ± 0.42 a | 66.67 ± 1.59 ab | 84.92 ± 1.74 a |
Fig. 2 Statistical distribution of measured plant height of potatoes at key growth stages Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ refer to the tuber initiation,tuber bulking and starch accumulation stages of potato,respectively. The same below. The horizontal lines in the boxplots represent median values
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 2022 | 2023 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | 块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | ||
夏波蒂 Shepody | N0 | 0.39 ± 0.04 a | 0.72 ± 0.07 cde | 0.69 ± 0.07 de | 0.43 ± 0.03 e | 0.75 ± 0.07 de | 0.37 ± 0.07 d |
N1 | 0.36 ± 0.01 a | 0.63 ± 0.03 e | 0.61 ± 0.04 e | 0.45 ± 0.02 e | 0.87 ± 0.04 abc | 0.27 ± 0.12 d | |
N2 | 0.40 ± 0.01 a | 0.76 ± 0.06 bcd | 0.73 ± 0.04 cde | 0.46 ± 0.02 cde | 0.91 ± 0.05 ab | 0.42 ± 0.06 d | |
N3 | 0.40 ± 0.02 a | 0.90 ± 0.02 a | 0.86 ± 0.02 ab | 0.53 ± 0.03 bc | 0.98 ± 0.00 a | 0.79 ± 0.06 abc | |
N4 | 0.37 ± 0.02 a | 0.87 ± 0.05 ab | 0.84 ± 0.04 abc | 0.45 ± 0.01 de | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | 0.84 ± 0.05 ab | |
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | N0 | 0.34 ± 0.04 a | 0.67 ± 0.04 de | 0.70 ± 0.05 de | 0.49 ± 0.03 cde | 0.67 ± 0.06 e | 0.64 ± 0.09 c |
N1 | 0.32 ± 0.01 a | 0.65 ± 0.03 de | 0.66 ± 0.04 de | 0.53 ± 0.02 bc | 0.75 ± 0.06 cde | 0.73 ± 0.08 bc | |
N2 | 0.34 ± 0.01 a | 0.73 ± 0.02 cde | 0.76 ± 0.04 bcd | 0.52 ± 0.03 cd | 0.84 ± 0.06 bcd | 0.82 ± 0.09 abc | |
N3 | 0.36 ± 0.02 a | 0.87 ± 0.01 ab | 0.94 ± 0.01 a | 0.66 ± 0.01 a | 0.99 ± 0.00 a | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | |
N4 | 0.34 ± 0.02 a | 0.85 ± 0.07 abc | 0.93 ± 0.03 a | 0.60 ± 0.04 ab | 0.97 ± 0.00 a | 0.97 ± 0.01 a |
Table 2 Canopy cover of potatoes at key growth stages
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 2022 | 2023 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | 块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | ||
夏波蒂 Shepody | N0 | 0.39 ± 0.04 a | 0.72 ± 0.07 cde | 0.69 ± 0.07 de | 0.43 ± 0.03 e | 0.75 ± 0.07 de | 0.37 ± 0.07 d |
N1 | 0.36 ± 0.01 a | 0.63 ± 0.03 e | 0.61 ± 0.04 e | 0.45 ± 0.02 e | 0.87 ± 0.04 abc | 0.27 ± 0.12 d | |
N2 | 0.40 ± 0.01 a | 0.76 ± 0.06 bcd | 0.73 ± 0.04 cde | 0.46 ± 0.02 cde | 0.91 ± 0.05 ab | 0.42 ± 0.06 d | |
N3 | 0.40 ± 0.02 a | 0.90 ± 0.02 a | 0.86 ± 0.02 ab | 0.53 ± 0.03 bc | 0.98 ± 0.00 a | 0.79 ± 0.06 abc | |
N4 | 0.37 ± 0.02 a | 0.87 ± 0.05 ab | 0.84 ± 0.04 abc | 0.45 ± 0.01 de | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | 0.84 ± 0.05 ab | |
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | N0 | 0.34 ± 0.04 a | 0.67 ± 0.04 de | 0.70 ± 0.05 de | 0.49 ± 0.03 cde | 0.67 ± 0.06 e | 0.64 ± 0.09 c |
N1 | 0.32 ± 0.01 a | 0.65 ± 0.03 de | 0.66 ± 0.04 de | 0.53 ± 0.02 bc | 0.75 ± 0.06 cde | 0.73 ± 0.08 bc | |
N2 | 0.34 ± 0.01 a | 0.73 ± 0.02 cde | 0.76 ± 0.04 bcd | 0.52 ± 0.03 cd | 0.84 ± 0.06 bcd | 0.82 ± 0.09 abc | |
N3 | 0.36 ± 0.02 a | 0.87 ± 0.01 ab | 0.94 ± 0.01 a | 0.66 ± 0.01 a | 0.99 ± 0.00 a | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | |
N4 | 0.34 ± 0.02 a | 0.85 ± 0.07 abc | 0.93 ± 0.03 a | 0.60 ± 0.04 ab | 0.97 ± 0.00 a | 0.97 ± 0.01 a |
变异来源Sources of variation | 平方和 Sum Sq | 自由度 df | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Cultivar | 2.67E-02 | 1 | 3.56E+00 | 6.88E-02 |
氮素水平 N level | 7.96E-16 | 2 | 5.31E-14 | 1.00E+00 |
氮素形态 N form | 0.00E+00 | 2 | 0.00E+00 | 1.00E+00 |
品种×氮素水平(Cultivar × N level) | 2.37E-16 | 2 | 1.58E-14 | 1.00E+00 |
品种×氮素形态(Cultivar × N form) | 4.45E-16 | 2 | 2.97E-14 | 1.00E+00 |
氮素水平 × 氮素形态(N level × N form) | 4.09E-01 | 4 | 1.36E+01 | 2.00E-06*** |
品种 × 氮素水平 × 氮素形态(Cultivar × N level × N form) | 2.28E-02 | 4 | 7.60E-01 | 5.60E-01 |
残差Residual | 2.25E-01 | 30 |
Table 3 Analysis of variance results for canopy cover at potato tuber bulking stage
变异来源Sources of variation | 平方和 Sum Sq | 自由度 df | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Cultivar | 2.67E-02 | 1 | 3.56E+00 | 6.88E-02 |
氮素水平 N level | 7.96E-16 | 2 | 5.31E-14 | 1.00E+00 |
氮素形态 N form | 0.00E+00 | 2 | 0.00E+00 | 1.00E+00 |
品种×氮素水平(Cultivar × N level) | 2.37E-16 | 2 | 1.58E-14 | 1.00E+00 |
品种×氮素形态(Cultivar × N form) | 4.45E-16 | 2 | 2.97E-14 | 1.00E+00 |
氮素水平 × 氮素形态(N level × N form) | 4.09E-01 | 4 | 1.36E+01 | 2.00E-06*** |
品种 × 氮素水平 × 氮素形态(Cultivar × N level × N form) | 2.28E-02 | 4 | 7.60E-01 | 5.60E-01 |
残差Residual | 2.25E-01 | 30 |
品种Cultivar | 处理Treatment | CCmax | t1/td | t2/td | te/td | Asum/td |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
夏波蒂 Shepody | N0 | 0.74 ± 0.06 de | 50.00 ± 0 a | 58.93 ± 1.21 abc | 70.56 ± 0.95 e | 31.68 ± 2.31 e |
N1 | 0.86 ± 0.04 abc | 50.00 ± 0 a | 59.66 ± 1.89 abc | 69.30 ± 1.92 e | 35.67 ± 1.98 de | |
N2 | 0.91 ± 0.04 ab | 47.12 ± 1.82 ab | 56.06 ± 0.84 c | 70.89 ± 0.31 e | 37.82 ± 1.76 cd | |
N3 | 0.98 ± 0 a | 37.12 ± 1.14 de | 57.90 ± 1.84 bc | 76.26 ± 0.90 d | 46.44 ± 1.27 b | |
N4 | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | 41.13 ± 0.48 cd | 59.80 ± 1.15 abc | 76.61 ± 1.60 d | 44.47 ± 1.30 b | |
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | N0 | 0.67 ± 0.06 e | 45.25 ± 2.97 abc | 62.34 ± 1.11 ab | 84.27 ± 1.35 c | 38.46 ± 3.36 cd |
N1 | 0.75 ± 0.06 cde | 44.00 ± 4.06 bc | 63.08 ± 1.45 a | 86.86 ± 0.79 bc | 43.67 ± 3.51 bc | |
N2 | 0.84 ± 0.06 bcd | 48.08 ± 1.31 ab | 61.74 ± 1.92 ab | 89.53 ± 4.27 b | 48.29 ± 1.70 b | |
N3 | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | 35.53 ± 2.06 e | 61.59 ± 0.50 ab | 88.59 ± 2.44 bc | 57.36 ± 1.45 a | |
N4 | 0.95 ± 0 ab | 36.47 ± 1.87 de | 62.91 ± 1.24 a | 96.81 ± 1.94 a | 60.64 ± 2.19 a |
Table 4 Fitting results of key parameters in the potato canopy development model
品种Cultivar | 处理Treatment | CCmax | t1/td | t2/td | te/td | Asum/td |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
夏波蒂 Shepody | N0 | 0.74 ± 0.06 de | 50.00 ± 0 a | 58.93 ± 1.21 abc | 70.56 ± 0.95 e | 31.68 ± 2.31 e |
N1 | 0.86 ± 0.04 abc | 50.00 ± 0 a | 59.66 ± 1.89 abc | 69.30 ± 1.92 e | 35.67 ± 1.98 de | |
N2 | 0.91 ± 0.04 ab | 47.12 ± 1.82 ab | 56.06 ± 0.84 c | 70.89 ± 0.31 e | 37.82 ± 1.76 cd | |
N3 | 0.98 ± 0 a | 37.12 ± 1.14 de | 57.90 ± 1.84 bc | 76.26 ± 0.90 d | 46.44 ± 1.27 b | |
N4 | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | 41.13 ± 0.48 cd | 59.80 ± 1.15 abc | 76.61 ± 1.60 d | 44.47 ± 1.30 b | |
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | N0 | 0.67 ± 0.06 e | 45.25 ± 2.97 abc | 62.34 ± 1.11 ab | 84.27 ± 1.35 c | 38.46 ± 3.36 cd |
N1 | 0.75 ± 0.06 cde | 44.00 ± 4.06 bc | 63.08 ± 1.45 a | 86.86 ± 0.79 bc | 43.67 ± 3.51 bc | |
N2 | 0.84 ± 0.06 bcd | 48.08 ± 1.31 ab | 61.74 ± 1.92 ab | 89.53 ± 4.27 b | 48.29 ± 1.70 b | |
N3 | 0.97 ± 0.01 a | 35.53 ± 2.06 e | 61.59 ± 0.50 ab | 88.59 ± 2.44 bc | 57.36 ± 1.45 a | |
N4 | 0.95 ± 0 ab | 36.47 ± 1.87 de | 62.91 ± 1.24 a | 96.81 ± 1.94 a | 60.64 ± 2.19 a |
Fig. 4 Relationship between integrated area of potato canopy development curve(At)and cumulative photosynthetically active radiation interception and total dry mass per plant
Fig. 5 Correlation between extracted parameters based on RGB images and yield CC:Canopy cover;Hmean:Extracted plant height;CCmax:Maximum canopy cover;t1:Initial time of CCmax;t2:Onset time of canopy decline;te:End time of growth;At:Integral area under the canopy development curve;Asum:Total integral area of the canopy development curve. ** denotes P < 0.01;* denotes P < 0.05
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0529 |
程立真, 朱西存, 高璐璐, 李程, 王凌, 赵庚星, 姜远茂. 2017. 基于RGB模型的苹果叶片叶绿素含量估测. 园艺学报, 44 (2):381-390.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0529 |
|
[5] |
|
高媛, 秦永林, 樊明寿. 2012. 马铃薯块茎形成的氮素营养调控. 作物杂志, 28 (6):14-18.
|
|
[6] |
|
郝凯, 贾立国, 秦永林, 樊明寿. 2020. 氮素对马铃薯源-库关系影响研究进展. 作物杂志, 36 (3):22-26.
|
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0738 |
李爽, 林永鑫, 秦军红, 李广存, 金黎平, 刘建刚, 卞春松. 2024. 马铃薯氮素诊断研究进展. 园艺学报, 51 (10):2449-2468.
|
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
宋明华, 陈锦, 蒋婧, 王枫, 于飞海. 2020. 13CO2示踪不同化学形态氮素添加对高寒草甸植物光合碳分配的影响. 生态学报, 40 (11):3688-3697.
|
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0441 |
王浩淼, 宋苗语, 李翔, 扈朝阳, 鲁任翔, 王翔, 马会勤. 2021. 无人机高光谱遥感监测葡萄长势与缺株定位. 园艺学报, 48 (8):1626-1634.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0441 |
|
[30] |
|
王良俊, 郑顺林, 钟蕾, 李世林, 宋明亮, 袁继超. 2015. 不同密度对四川盆地春、秋季马铃薯生长、产量和经济效益的影响. 生态学杂志, 34 (6):1572.
|
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0436 |
闫文渊, 秦军红, 段绍光, 徐建飞, 简银巧, 金黎平, 李广存. 2022. 水氮耦合对马铃薯光合特性、块茎形成和品质的影响. 园艺学报, 49 (7):1491-1504.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0436 |
|
[33] |
|
杨肖娥, 孙羲. 1991. 杂交水稻(F1)光合作用的优势及其与氮素营养的关系. 浙江农业大学学报, 17 (4):355-359.
|
|
[34] |
pmid: 15689339 |
[35] |
|
尤晗, 金光辉, 刘喜才, 高幼华, 姜丽丽, 冯玉钿, 王腾. 2016. 大垄双行不同种植密度下切块与整薯播种对‘垦薯1号’马铃薯植物学性状和产量的影响. 中国马铃薯, 30 (2):87-92.
|
|
[36] |
|
[1] | CHEN Li, LI Yadong, YANG Lei, LIU Jiaxin, ZHAO Dongshuang, SUN Haiyue. A New Cranberry Cultivar‘Heyunhong’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 59-60. |
[2] | PATIGULI Maimaitituerxun, ZHOU Bin, LUO Qinghong, SHENG Wei, JIANG Teng. A New Cultivar of Elaeagnus moorcroftii‘Jinsha’in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 71-72. |
[3] | LIU Chong, YI Dandan, ZOU Danrong, ZHOU Lixue, WANG Hui, SHENG Lili, CHEN Xiaofeng, ZHANG Yaming, GUI Hang. A New Non-Heading Chinese Cabbage Cultivar‘Qingmei 1’of High-Yield and High-Quality [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 87-88. |
[4] | YANG Li, QIN Ya, BIAN Baciren, ZHEN Zhen, QIONG Ji, BAI Maquzhen, ZHOU Ya. A New Cultivar of Colored Potato‘Xigezi 2’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 145-146. |
[5] | DOU Xueting, ZHU Xi, ZHANG Ning, and SI Huaijun. Functional Analysis of StHY5 Associated with Low-Temperature Stress in Potato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(7): 1745-1757. |
[6] | SONG Qianna, SONG Lushuai, DUAN Yonghong, BAI Xiaodong, and FENG Ruiyun. Establishment a System to Obtain CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Plants Based on Hairy Root Transformation in Potatoes [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(7): 1758-1768. |
[7] | ZHU Xingzhe, SU Xianyue, SU Wang, ZHANG Honglin, PAN Zhechao, LIU Tao, and XU Xiaoyu. Understanding the Anabolic Differences of Steroidal Glycoalkaloids in Leaf Between Two Potato Varieties Grown at the Winter and Spring Cropping Patterns [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(7): 1883-1900. |
[8] | LI Ziyan, CHEN Weixi, LI Zihan, LI Yin, LIANG Fengming, ZENG Xiangli, JIAN Hongju, and LÜ Dianqiu. Screening Candidate Genes Controlling Potato Maturation Time Based on RNA-Seq [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(6): 1505-1518. |
[9] | LIN Xi, DENG Zhenpeng, YANG Xinyue, ZHOU Keyou, YI Xiaoping, WANG Jichun. Effects of Reducing Chemical Fertilizer Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Potato Yield and Nutrient Utilization [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(4): 1007-1019. |
[10] | HU Yawei, MA Jinlong, ZHONG Balian, YAO Fengxian, LIU Guidong. Preliminary Study on Utilization of 15N-urea Applied to Young Navel Orange Trees in Summer and Its Residual in Soil [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 705-713. |
[11] | CONG Xin, HU Qianyuan, PANG Guibin, XU Lirong, XU Zhenghe, LIU Hongfei, PEI Xiangli. Effect of the Salinity of Irrigation Water on Growth,Yield,and Quality of Ziziphus jujuba‘Dongzao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 714-726. |
[12] | REN Yi, ZHANG Yixing, HOU Saisai, NIE Lanchun, LI Qingyun, WANG Xinxin. Research Progress on the Preparation Method of Biochar and Its Application Effect on Returning to Field in Facility Vegetable Fields [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 792-812. |
[13] | MAO Xin, YUAN Wenfei, GUO Yurun, XU Xinxin, LI Yi, ZHANG Yi, MIAO Yanxiu, BAI Longqiang, LI Yansu. Analysis of the Decomposition of Organic Materials and Nutrients Contents in Root Zone and Leaves of Cucumber Under Organic Substrate Planting Board Cultivation in Solar Greenhouse [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 439-452. |
[14] | ZHOU Jinhua, BAI Lei, ZHANG Rui, GUO Huachun. The Effect of Reducing Soil Temperature with Straw Mulching Cultivation on Potato Growth [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 453-466. |
[15] | HUANG Xun, LIU Xia, DENG Linmei, WANG Xingguo, XU Yajin, YANG Yanli. Identification and Study on Its Biocontrol and Growth Promoting Properties of Bacillus velezensis 1X1Y Against Potato Common Scab [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 229-246. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd