Physiological Response of Shine Muscat Grape Seedlings Grafted with Different Rootstocks to Combined Stress of Salt and Low Temperature

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0021

Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 693-704.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0021

• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles

Physiological Response of Shine Muscat Grape Seedlings Grafted with Different Rootstocks to Combined Stress of Salt and Low Temperature

XING Zhigan¹, LEI Xiangzhao¹, WANG Haochen¹, FENG Mingxin¹, LI Jingwen¹, LIU Yujia¹, FANG Yulin¹, MENG Jiangfei¹^,²^,^*()

¹ College of Enology，Northwest A & F University，Yangling，Shaanxi 712100，China
² Shaanxi Engineering Research for Viti-Viniculture，Yangling，Shaanxi 712100，China

Received:2024-10-15 Revised:2025-01-14 Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-03-25
Contact: MENG Jiangfei

Abstract

Abstract:

‘Shine Muscat’grape was grafted onto‘5BB’‘Kangzhen 3’‘SO4’and‘101-14’rootstocks to investigate their tolerance. The results showed that the grafted seedlings could reduce the content of MDA and relative electrical conductivity，increase the content of osmoregulatory substances（including proline，soluble sugars，and soluble proteins），and improve the antioxidant enzymes activity and photosynthetic capacity at varying degrees under salt stress compared to self rooted seedlings，among them，‘Shine Muscat/SO4’showed the best tolerance to salt stress. In addition，under low temperature stress，the changes in various physiological and biochemical indicators of grafted and self rooted seedlings are similar to those under salt stress，but the amount and degree of change was different obviously.‘Shine Muscat/5BB’exhibit stronger low temperature tolerance. Under combined stress of salt and low temperature，the MDA content of‘Shine Muscat/SO4’was significantly lower than that of other rootstock grafted seedlings and showed the least damage symptoms，while the content of soluble proteins，total soluble sugars and free proline was significantly higher than that of individual salt and low temperature stress treatment，the same as the stimulative activities of CAT and POD. Overall，comprehensive comparative analysis indicated the‘Shine Muscat’grafted onto‘SO4’has the strongest resistance to the combined salt and low temperature stress，and is most suitable for further promotion and utilization，while ‘5BB’is more suitable for improving the cold resistance of grapevines.

Key words: grape, rootstock, salt, low temperature, resistance, physiological response

XING Zhigan, LEI Xiangzhao, WANG Haochen, FENG Mingxin, LI Jingwen, LIU Yujia, FANG Yulin, MENG Jiangfei. Physiological Response of Shine Muscat Grape Seedlings Grafted with Different Rootstocks to Combined Stress of Salt and Low Temperature[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 693-704.

Figures/Tables 10

References 29

[1]	BascunanGodoy L, Franck N, Zamorano D, Sanhueza C, Carvajal D E, Ibacache A. 2017. Rootstock effect on irrigated grapevine yield under arid climate conditions are explained by changes in traits related to light absorption of the scion. Scientia Horticulturae, 218:284-292.
[2]	Cao Jiandong. 2010. Studies on cold resistance and salt tolerance of nine grape rootstocks and grape varieties[M. D. Dissertation]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	曹建东. 2010. 9个葡萄砧木和品种的抗寒性及耐盐性鉴定[硕士论文]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学.
[3]	Fu M M, Xu Z, Ma H Y, Hao Y F, Tian J, Wang Y, Zhang X Z, Xu X F, Han Z H, Wu T. 2024. Characteristics of long-distance mobile mRNAs from shoot to root in grafted plant species. Horticultural Plant Journal, 10 (1):25-37.
[4]	Gao Zhen, Di Heng, Zang Xinglong, Zhu Huaping, Du Yuanpeng. 2014. Using differential thermal analysis to analyze grape buds cold hardiness of 8 rootstocks and 6 cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 41 (1):17-25. (in Chinese)
	高振, 翟衡, 臧兴隆, 朱化平, 杜远鹏. 2014. 低温放热法研究8个葡萄砧木和6个栽培品种芽的抗寒性. 园艺学报, 41 (1):17-25.
[5]	Hao Yan, Zhu Yanfang, Zhang Kun, Wang Yu’an. 2022. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of two table grape varieties. Non-wood Forest Research, 40 (4):246-255. (in Chinese)
	郝燕, 朱燕芳, 张坤, 王玉安. 2022. 不同砧木对两个鲜食葡萄品种生长与果实品质的影响. 经济林研究, 40 (4):246-255.
[6]	Ibacache A, Albornoz F, Zurita-Silva A. 2016. Yield responses in Flame seedless,Thompson seedless and Red Globe table grape cultivars are differentially modified by rootstocks under semi arid conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 204:25-32.
[7]	Kumar P, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Colla G. 2017. Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efficiency. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8:1130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01130 pmid: 28713405
[8]	Kupe M. 2023. Ice nucleation active bacteria in vineyards and orchards and low temperature damage. Research in Agricultural Sciences, 54 (1):42-47.
[9]	Li M M, Guo Z J, Jia N, Yuan J W, Han B, Yin Y G, Sun Y, Liu C J, Zhao S J. 2019. Evaluation of eight rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of‘Marselan’grapevines. Scientia Horticulturae, 248:58-61.
[10]	Li Mengxu, Fan Jian. 2023. Research status and development trend of vegetable grafting technology. Agricultural Engineering, 13 (4):140-145. (in Chinese)
	李梦旭, 樊健. 2023. 蔬菜嫁接技术研究现状及发展趋势. 农业工程, 13 (4):140-145.
[11]	Li Pengcheng, Li Ming, Guo Shaojie, Su Xuede, Zhang Lianjie. 2015. Introduction performance and cold resistance analysis of several grape rootstocks. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 31 (34):93-97. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15050057
	李鹏程, 李铭, 郭绍杰, 苏学德, 张连杰. 2015. 几种葡萄砧木的引种表现及抗寒性分析. 中国农学通报, 31 (34):93-97. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15050057
[12]	Liao Xiangru, He Puchao, Wan Yizhen, Zhu Xinchan. 1996. Injury of the leaves of grapevine cuttings under NaCl salt stress. Journal of Fruit Science,(4):211-214. (in Chinese)
	廖祥儒, 贺普超, 万怡震, 朱新产. 1996. 盐胁迫对葡萄离体新梢叶片的伤害作用. 果树科学,(4):211-214.
[13]	Liu Zhongjie, Zheng Ting, Zhao Fanggui, Fu Weihong, Zhuge Yaxian, Zhang Zhichang, Fang Jinggui. 2022. Resistance difference and physiological response mechanism of grape rootstocks to osmotic stress. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 49 (5):984-994. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0165 URL
	刘众杰, 郑婷, 赵方贵, 傅伟红, 诸葛雅贤, 张志昌, 房经贵. 2022. 葡萄砧木对渗透胁迫的抗性差异及生理响应机理. 园艺学报, 49 (5):984-994. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0165 URL
[14]	Marín D, Miranda C, Abad F J, Urrestarazu J, Mayor B, Villa-Llop A, Santesteban L G. 2023. Agronomic evaluation of eight 41 B × 110 richter grapevine genotypes as rootstock candidates for mediterranean viticulture. Horticultural Plant Journal, 9 (4):720-728.
[15]	Meggio F, Prinsi B, Negri A S, Simone-Di L G, Lucchini G, Pitacco A, Failla O, Scienza A, Cocucci M, Espen L. 2014. Biochemical and physiological responses of two grapevine rootstock genotypes to drought and salt treatments. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 20 (2):310-323.
[16]	Parisi M, Pentangelo A, D’Alessandro A, Festa G, Francese G, Navarro A, SanajàV O, Mennella G. 2023. Grafting effects on bioactive compounds,chemical and agronomic traits of‘Corbarino’tomato grown under greenhouse healthy conditions. Horticultural Plant Journal, 9 (2):273-284.
[17]	Shi Xiaomin. 2021. Comparative study on salt tolerance of 13 grapevine rootstocks[M. D. Dissertation]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University. (in Chinese)
	史晓敏. 2021. 13种葡萄砧木耐盐性差异比较研究[硕士论文]. 银川: 宁夏大学.
[18]	Shu Sheng, Hu Xiaohui, Wang Yu, Zhang Runhua, Yuan Yinghui, Cheng Changjun, Shi Lu, Guo Shirong. 2022. Research progress on stress physiology and stress-resistant cultivation of vegetable crops. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 45 (6):1087-1098. (in Chinese)
	束胜, 胡晓辉, 王玉, 张润花, 袁颖辉, 陈长军, 施露, 郭世荣. 2022. 蔬菜作物逆境生理与抗逆栽培研究进展. 南京农业大学学报, 45 (6):1087-1098.
[19]	Suarez D L, Celis N, Anderson R G, Sandhu D. 2019. Grape rootstock response to salinity,water and combined salinity and water stresses. Agronomy, 9 (6):321.
[20]	Tecchio M A, Da-Silva M J R, Callili D, Hernandes J L, Moura M F. 2020. Yield of white and red grapes,in terms of quality,from hybrids and Vitis labrusca grafted on different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 259:108846.
[21]	Tedesco S, Pina A, Fevereiro P, Kragler F. 2020. A phenotypic search on graft compatibility in grapevine. Agronomy-Basel, 10 (5):706.
[22]	Walker R R, Blackmore D H, Clingeleffer P R, Emanuelli D. 2014. Rootstock type determines tolerance of Chardonnay and Shiraz to long-term saline irrigation. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 20 (3):496-506.
[23]	Wang Weijun, Hao Jianyu, Chen Wenchao, Liu Jingjing, Lü Lixia, Yang Xi. 2021. Effects of different root stocks on phenophase and fruit quality of Miguang grapevines. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 49 (7):872-875. (in Chinese)
	王伟军, 郝建宇, 陈文朝, 刘晶晶, 吕丽霞, 杨茜. 2021. 不同砧木对蜜光葡萄物候期和果实品质的影响. 山西农业科学, 49 (7):872-875.
[24]	Wei Jianming, Li Yunzhou, Liang Yan. 2023. Advances in research on improving tomato disease resistance and stress resistance by grafting technology. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 50 (9):1997-2014. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0569 URL
	韦建明, 李云洲, 梁燕. 2023. 嫁接技术提高番茄抗病抗逆性的研究进展. 园艺学报, 50 (9):1997-2014. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0569 URL
[25]	Yuan Junwei, Li Minmin, Yin Yonggang, Liu Changjiang, Han Bin, Sun Yan, Jia Nan, Guo Zijuan, Zhao Shengjian. 2019. Physiological responses of Cabernet Sauvign seedlings grafted on different salt-tolerant rootstocks to NaCl stress. Journal of China Agricultural University, 24 (8):48-59. (in Chinese)
	袁军伟, 李敏敏, 尹勇刚, 刘长江, 韩斌, 孙艳, 贾楠, 郭紫娟, 赵胜建. 2019. 不同砧木嫁接的赤霞珠葡萄对盐胁迫的生理响应. 中国农业大学学报, 24 (8):48-59.
[26]	Yin Y G, Jia N, Li M M, Liu C J, Yuan J W, Han B, Sun Y, Zhao S J, Guo Z J. 2021. Rootstocks induce shifts in tree vigor,yield and berry quality of ‘Summer Black’ grapevines. European Journal of Horticultural Science, 86 (1):41-48.
[27]	Zhao M, Li J, Shi X, Sanaullah Malik M, Quan Y, Guo D, Wang L, Wang S. 2023. Effects of exogenous plant regulators on growth and development of“Kyoho”grape under salt alkali stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14:1274684.
[28]	Zhou Q, Gao B, Li W F, Mao J, Yang S J, Li W, Ma Z H, Zhao X, Chen B H. 2020. Effects of exogenous growth regulators and bud picking on grafting of grapevine hard branches. Scientia Horticulturae, 264:109186.
[29]	Zhou Wanhai. 2005. Studies on salt tolerance of grape rootstock and characteristics of rootstock-scion interaction[M. D. Dissertation]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	周万海. 2005. 葡萄砧木耐盐性及砧—穗特性研究[硕士论文]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学.

指标Index	砧木Rootstock				自根苗 Self-rooted plants
指标Index	5BB	SO4	101-14	抗砧3号Kangzhen 3	自根苗 Self-rooted plants
相对电导率REC	0.587	0.802	0.636	0.370	0.043
丙二醛MDA	0.709	0.882	0.637	0.505	0.101
叶绿素Chl	0.561	0.980	0.807	0.709	0.019
最大光化学效率F_v/F_m	0.715	0.961	0.863	0.715	0.076
潜在光化学效率F_v/F_o	0.572	0.963	0.767	0.595	0.061
净光合速率P_n	0.385	0.912	0.637	0.560	0.077
气孔导度G_s	0.149	0.860	0.708	0.416	0.185
胞间二氧化碳浓度C_i	0.619	0.901	0.738	0.243	0.082
蒸腾速率T_r	0.163	0.884	0.419	0.721	0.326
可溶性总糖SS	0.485	0.989	0.007	0.556	0.296
可溶性蛋白SP	0.069	0.947	0.561	0.301	0.031
游离脯氨酸Pro	0.619	0.952	0.286	0.417	0.119
过氧化氢酶CAT	0.356	0.895	0.632	0.442	0.052
过氧化物酶POD	0.355	0.917	0.694	0.320	0.042
超氧化物歧化酶SOD	0.405	0.916	0.714	0.500	0.119
平均值Mean	0.450	0.917	0.607	0.491	0.109
抗性级别Tolerance level	3	1	2	3	5

指标Index	砧木Rootstock				自根苗 Self-rooted plants
指标Index	5BB	SO4	101-14	抗砧3号Kangzhen 3	自根苗 Self-rooted plants
相对电导率REC	0.587	0.802	0.636	0.370	0.043
丙二醛MDA	0.709	0.882	0.637	0.505	0.101
叶绿素Chl	0.561	0.980	0.807	0.709	0.019
最大光化学效率F_v/F_m	0.715	0.961	0.863	0.715	0.076
潜在光化学效率F_v/F_o	0.572	0.963	0.767	0.595	0.061
净光合速率P_n	0.385	0.912	0.637	0.560	0.077
气孔导度G_s	0.149	0.860	0.708	0.416	0.185
胞间二氧化碳浓度C_i	0.619	0.901	0.738	0.243	0.082
蒸腾速率T_r	0.163	0.884	0.419	0.721	0.326
可溶性总糖SS	0.485	0.989	0.007	0.556	0.296
可溶性蛋白SP	0.069	0.947	0.561	0.301	0.031
游离脯氨酸Pro	0.619	0.952	0.286	0.417	0.119
过氧化氢酶CAT	0.356	0.895	0.632	0.442	0.052
过氧化物酶POD	0.355	0.917	0.694	0.320	0.042
超氧化物歧化酶SOD	0.405	0.916	0.714	0.500	0.119
平均值Mean	0.450	0.917	0.607	0.491	0.109
抗性级别Tolerance level	3	1	2	3	5

指标Index	砧木Rootstock				自根苗 Self-rooted
指标Index	5BB	SO4	101-14	抗砧3号Kangzhen 3	自根苗 Self-rooted
相对电导率REC	0.764	0.541	0.205	0.591	0.164
丙二醛MDA	0.981	0.792	0.540	0.396	0.115
叶绿素Chl	0.288	0.940	0.831	0.125	0.016
最大光化学效率F_v/F_m	0.735	0.321	0.231	0.923	0.105
潜在光化学效率F_v/F_o	0.649	0.155	0.179	0.932	0.058
净光合速率P_n	0.943	0.505	0.590	0.486	0.057
气孔导度G_s	0.804	0.490	0.139	0.682	0.380
胞间二氧化碳浓度C_i	0.864	0.825	0.545	0.377	0.139
蒸腾速率T_r	0.900	0.750	0.225	0.550	0.150
可溶性总糖SS	0.984	0.578	0.045	0.364	0.006
可溶性蛋白SP	0.933	0.113	0.563	0.122	0.043
游离脯氨酸Pro	0.965	0.614	0.263	0.070	0.158
过氧化氢酶CAT	0.831	0.598	0.292	0.252	0.108
过氧化物酶POD	0.954	0.667	0.758	0.257	0.061
超氧化物歧化酶SOD	0.901	0.333	0.550	0.300	0.101
平均值Mean	0.833	0.542	0.397	0.428	0.111
抗性级别Tolerance level	1	2	4	3	5

指标Index	砧木Rootstock				自根苗 Self-rooted
指标Index	5BB	SO4	101-14	抗砧3号Kangzhen 3	自根苗 Self-rooted
相对电导率REC	0.764	0.541	0.205	0.591	0.164
丙二醛MDA	0.981	0.792	0.540	0.396	0.115
叶绿素Chl	0.288	0.940	0.831	0.125	0.016
最大光化学效率F_v/F_m	0.735	0.321	0.231	0.923	0.105
潜在光化学效率F_v/F_o	0.649	0.155	0.179	0.932	0.058
净光合速率P_n	0.943	0.505	0.590	0.486	0.057
气孔导度G_s	0.804	0.490	0.139	0.682	0.380
胞间二氧化碳浓度C_i	0.864	0.825	0.545	0.377	0.139
蒸腾速率T_r	0.900	0.750	0.225	0.550	0.150
可溶性总糖SS	0.984	0.578	0.045	0.364	0.006
可溶性蛋白SP	0.933	0.113	0.563	0.122	0.043
游离脯氨酸Pro	0.965	0.614	0.263	0.070	0.158
过氧化氢酶CAT	0.831	0.598	0.292	0.252	0.108
过氧化物酶POD	0.954	0.667	0.758	0.257	0.061
超氧化物歧化酶SOD	0.901	0.333	0.550	0.300	0.101
平均值Mean	0.833	0.542	0.397	0.428	0.111
抗性级别Tolerance level	1	2	4	3	5

指标 Index	砧木Rootstock				自根苗 Self-rooted
指标 Index	5BB	SO4	101-14	抗砧3号Kangzhen 3	自根苗 Self-rooted
相对电导率REC	0.506	0.796	0.333	0.423	0.075
丙二醛MDA	0.894	0.992	0.618	0.417	0.008
叶绿素Chl	0.144	0.988	0.144	0.742	0.004
最大光化学效率F_v/F_m	0.712	0.858	0.420	0.712	0.128
潜在光化学效率F_v/F_o	0.648	0.910	0.398	0.598	0.073
净光合速率P_n	0.764	0.944	0.596	0.371	0.067
气孔导度G_s	0.861	0.547	0.342	0.394	0.114
胞间二氧化碳浓度C_i	0.686	0.899	0.535	0.359	0.106
蒸腾速率T_r	0.263	0.895	0.509	0.351	0.105
可溶性总糖SS	0.577	0.991	0.077	0.495	0.007
可溶性蛋白SP	0.693	0.941	0.452	0.053	0.211
游离脯氨酸Pro	0.788	0.955	0.288	0.303	0.121
过氧化氢酶CAT	0.600	0.870	0.448	0.192	0.077
过氧化物酶POD	0.531	0.963	0.753	0.457	0.037
超氧化物歧化酶SOD	0.777	0.921	0.461	0.619	0.095
平均值Mean	0.630	0.898	0.425	0.432	0.082
抗性级别Tolerance level	2	1	3	3	5

Physiological Response of Shine Muscat Grape Seedlings Grafted with Different Rootstocks to Combined Stress of Salt and Low Temperature

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 29

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Shengping, DONG Shaoyun, GUAN Jiantao, MIAO Han, LIU Xiaoping, GU Xingfang. Research Progress on Molecular Breeding of Disease Resistance in Cucumber [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 773-791.
[2]	WANG Rui, WU Hongfei, ZHANG Changyuan, CAO Haishun, TAN Delong, GUO Jinju, WANG Yunlong, WANG Rufang, YUAN Yu, WU Tingquan. CsPUB54 Negatively Regulates Cucumber Resistance to Phytophthora Melonis by Interacting with PmRXLR1 Effector [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 591-602.
[3]	CONG Xin, HU Qianyuan, PANG Guibin, XU Lirong, XU Zhenghe, LIU Hongfei, PEI Xiangli. Effect of the Salinity of Irrigation Water on Growth，Yield，and Quality of Ziziphus jujuba‘Dongzao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 714-726.
[4]	ZHAO Yulei, LI Shan, LI Chengnan, MA Jinlong, MA Hongyi, YIN Xiao. Proteomics Studies on the Early Stages of Botrytis cinerea Infection in Grapevine Leaves [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 279-291.
[5]	CAI Zeyan, ZHANG Mingxing, ZHOU Chi, TAO Yu, YANG Sha, LI Xin, LI Xuefeng. Analysis of Endogenous Microbial Community Diversity，Structure and Function of Pepper Different Resistant Phytophthora Blight Cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 322-336.
[6]	CHEN Yajuan, JIN Xin, YANG Jiangshan, DAI Zibo, LI Dou, SHAO Zhang. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Sugar-Acid Metabolism and Aroma Substances in‘Cabernet Gernischt’Grape Berries [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 406-422.
[7]	LI Ao, ZHENG Xu, WU Chengxu, NIE Ruining, JI Xinying, TANG Jiali, ZHANG Junpei. The Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Walnut Seedlings Under Salt Stress [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 423-438.
[8]	LI Xiaoqing, YAN Siyuan, GU Peiwen. Diversity and Pathogenicity Differentiation of Botrytis cinerea in Ningxia [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 481-490.
[9]	LI Min, LI Siyu, SHI Zihan, CHEN Shuang, XU Yan, LIU Guotian. Studies on the Efficiency of GRFs/GIFs for Genetic Transformation and Regeneration in Grapevine [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 51-65.
[10]	WANG Shanshan, GUO Rui, HE Ling, WU Chunhong, CHEN Chanyou, WAN Heping, ZHAO Huixia. Identification of Long Cowpea Lhc Gene Family and Its Expression Analysis Under Salt Stress [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 111-122.
[11]	LI Wenjing, SHI Shuo, ZHANG Hao, ZHANG Jiangyan, SONG Sihao, YANG Aizhen, SHEN Yuanyue, GUO Jiaxuan, GAO Fan. Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide and Putrescine on Drought Resistance of Strawberry Seedlings [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 2131-2142.
[12]	CHEN Ming, ZHANG Jieru, YANG Hangyun, WANG Yinbao, ZHENG Zhiyuan, ZENG Jiaoke, CHEN Jinyin, FU Yongqi, XIANG Miaolian. Induction Mechanism of Methyl Jasmonate on Postharvest Navel Orange Fruit Against Blue Mold [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 2183-2194.
[13]	ZHANG Yong, MA Jianxiang, WEI Chunhua, LI Hao, YANG Jianqiang, ZHANG Xian. A New Muskmelon Cultivar‘Nongdatian 10’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 2225-2226.
[14]	KUANG Meimei, LI Li, MA Jianwei, LIU Yuan, JIANG Hongfei, LEI Rui, MAN Yuping, WANG Yifan, HUANG Bo, WANG Yanchang, LIU Shibiao. Screening of Kiwifruit Canker Resistance-Related Genes Based on the Transcriptome Sequencing Analysis of Hybrids from Actinidia chinensis [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(8): 1743-1757.
[15]	LI Xujiao, LÜ Qi, YAO Dongdong, ZHAO Fengyun, WANG Xiaofei, YU Kun. Effect of‘Yanfu 3’Apple Grafted with Different Rootstocks on Absorption and Utilization of ¹⁵N-urea [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(8): 1868-1880.