Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (12): 2843-2856.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0036
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Jiangshan, CHEN Yajuan(), DAI Zibo, LI Dou, SHAO Zhang, JIN Xin, WANG Yuhang, WANG Chunheng
Received:
2024-08-14
Revised:
2024-09-27
Online:
2024-12-25
Published:
2024-12-13
Contact:
CHEN Yajuan
YANG Jiangshan, CHEN Yajuan, DAI Zibo, LI Dou, SHAO Zhang, JIN Xin, WANG Yuhang, WANG Chunheng. Effects of Potassium Fulvic Acid on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Fruit Quality of‘Cabernet Gernischt’Grape[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(12): 2843-2856.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0036
Fig. 1 Effects of fulvic acid potassium(FA-K)on photosynthetic pigment content in leaves of‘Cabernet Gernischet’grape at different growth stages Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments in the same period,P < 0.05. the same below.
FA-K/(mg · L-1) | 可溶性总糖/(mg · g-1) Total soluble sugar | 可溶性固形物/% Soluble solid | 可滴定酸/% Titratable acid | 固酸比 Solid-acid ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
0(对照Control) | 124.84 ± 4.18 c | 20.70 ± 0.36 c | 0.73 ± 0.02 a | 28.26 ± 0.90 d |
30 | 126.82 ± 6.20 c | 21.21 ± 0.48 bc | 0.69 ± 0.02 ab | 30.56 ± 0.95 c |
60 | 131.19 ± 10.21 b | 22.64 ± 0.23 b | 0.59 ± 0.01 bc | 38.50 ± 1.00 b |
90 | 157.25 ± 10.05 a | 23.56 ± 0.25 a | 0.54 ± 0.01 c | 43.24 ± 0.84 a |
120 | 128.31 ± 5.25 bc | 21.38 ± 0.51 bc | 0.68 ± 0.01 ab | 31.31 ± 1.10 c |
Table 1 Effects of FA-K on the contents of soluble sugar,soluble solids and titratable acid in‘Cabernet Gernischet’grape fruit
FA-K/(mg · L-1) | 可溶性总糖/(mg · g-1) Total soluble sugar | 可溶性固形物/% Soluble solid | 可滴定酸/% Titratable acid | 固酸比 Solid-acid ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
0(对照Control) | 124.84 ± 4.18 c | 20.70 ± 0.36 c | 0.73 ± 0.02 a | 28.26 ± 0.90 d |
30 | 126.82 ± 6.20 c | 21.21 ± 0.48 bc | 0.69 ± 0.02 ab | 30.56 ± 0.95 c |
60 | 131.19 ± 10.21 b | 22.64 ± 0.23 b | 0.59 ± 0.01 bc | 38.50 ± 1.00 b |
90 | 157.25 ± 10.05 a | 23.56 ± 0.25 a | 0.54 ± 0.01 c | 43.24 ± 0.84 a |
120 | 128.31 ± 5.25 bc | 21.38 ± 0.51 bc | 0.68 ± 0.01 ab | 31.31 ± 1.10 c |
FA-K/(mg · L-1) | 单宁/(mg · g-1) Tannin content | 总酚/(mg · g-1) Total phenol content | 总类黄酮/(mg · g-1) Total flavonoid content | 花色苷/(mg · g-1) Anthocyanins content |
---|---|---|---|---|
0(对照Control) | 2.56 ± 0.11 c | 3.24 ± 0.06 c | 3.48 ± 0.12 c | 0.14 ± 0.01 c |
30 | 2.64 ± 0.12 bc | 3.71 ± 0.06 bc | 3.52 ± 0.15 c | 0.18 ± 0.01 b |
60 | 2.91 ± 0.06 b | 4.82 ± 0.03 ab | 3.70 ± 0.12 ab | 0.20 ± 0.02 b |
90 | 3.27 ± 0.07 a | 5.31 ± 0.09 a | 3.81 ± 0.10 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 a |
120 | 2.89 ± 0.09 b | 4.16 ± 0.07 b | 3.62 ± 0.12 b | 0.19 ± 0.01 b |
Table 2 Effects of FA-K on the contents of tannin,total phenols,flavonoids and anthocyanins in‘Cabernet Gernischet’grape fruit
FA-K/(mg · L-1) | 单宁/(mg · g-1) Tannin content | 总酚/(mg · g-1) Total phenol content | 总类黄酮/(mg · g-1) Total flavonoid content | 花色苷/(mg · g-1) Anthocyanins content |
---|---|---|---|---|
0(对照Control) | 2.56 ± 0.11 c | 3.24 ± 0.06 c | 3.48 ± 0.12 c | 0.14 ± 0.01 c |
30 | 2.64 ± 0.12 bc | 3.71 ± 0.06 bc | 3.52 ± 0.15 c | 0.18 ± 0.01 b |
60 | 2.91 ± 0.06 b | 4.82 ± 0.03 ab | 3.70 ± 0.12 ab | 0.20 ± 0.02 b |
90 | 3.27 ± 0.07 a | 5.31 ± 0.09 a | 3.81 ± 0.10 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 a |
120 | 2.89 ± 0.09 b | 4.16 ± 0.07 b | 3.62 ± 0.12 b | 0.19 ± 0.01 b |
Fig. 4 Heatmap of correlation analysis between photosynthetic characteristics of grape leaves and fruit quality The related indexes of grape leaves were the average value of each phenological period,and the fruit quality index was the measured value of mature period. Chl.a:Chlorophyll a;Chl.b:Chlorophyll b;Car:Carotenoid;Chl.(a + b):Total chlorophyll;Pn:Net photosynthetic rate;Tr:Transpiration rate;Gs:Stomatal conductivity;Ci:Intercellular CO2 concentration;Fv/Fm:Maximal photochemical efficiency;Y(Ⅱ):Actual photochemical efficiency of PSII;qP:Photochemical quenching;qN:Non-photochemical quenching coefficient;ETR:Rate of electron transfer;Y(NPQ):Quantum yield of non-photochemical quenching;SSC:Soluble solids content;TSS:Total soluble sugar;TA:Titratable acid;RTT:Solid-acid ratio;Tan:Tannin;TP:Total phenols;TF:Total flavonoid;Ant:Anthocyanin. ** means extremely significant difference(P < 0.01),* means significant difference(P < 0.05).
指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component | 指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC1 | PC2 | |||
Chl.a | 0.047 | -0.245 | qN | 0.046 | 0.271 | |
Chl.b | 0.049 | -0.058 | ETR | 0.047 | 0.242 | |
Car | 0.045 | -0.322 | Y(NPQ) | -0.048 | 0.034 | |
Chl.(a + b) | 0.048 | -0.197 | TSS | 0.048 | 0.188 | |
Pn | 0.049 | 0.050 | TA | -0.048 | -0.194 | |
Tr | 0.048 | -0.029 | RTT | 0.048 | 0.206 | |
Gs | 0.049 | 0.077 | SSC | 0.049 | -0.059 | |
Ci | -0.045 | 0.344 | Tan | 0.048 | -0.104 | |
Fv/Fm | 0.047 | 0.088 | TP | 0.049 | 0.046 | |
Y(Ⅱ) | 0.043 | 0.373 | TF | 0.049 | 0.009 | |
qP | 0.046 | -0.261 | Ant | 0.047 | -0.094 | |
特征值Eigen value 方差贡献率/% Variance contribution 累计方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance proportion | 20.182 91.738 91.738 | 1.216 5.526 97.264 |
Table 3 Principal component loading matrix and variance contribution rate of grape leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality
指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component | 指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC1 | PC2 | |||
Chl.a | 0.047 | -0.245 | qN | 0.046 | 0.271 | |
Chl.b | 0.049 | -0.058 | ETR | 0.047 | 0.242 | |
Car | 0.045 | -0.322 | Y(NPQ) | -0.048 | 0.034 | |
Chl.(a + b) | 0.048 | -0.197 | TSS | 0.048 | 0.188 | |
Pn | 0.049 | 0.050 | TA | -0.048 | -0.194 | |
Tr | 0.048 | -0.029 | RTT | 0.048 | 0.206 | |
Gs | 0.049 | 0.077 | SSC | 0.049 | -0.059 | |
Ci | -0.045 | 0.344 | Tan | 0.048 | -0.104 | |
Fv/Fm | 0.047 | 0.088 | TP | 0.049 | 0.046 | |
Y(Ⅱ) | 0.043 | 0.373 | TF | 0.049 | 0.009 | |
qP | 0.046 | -0.261 | Ant | 0.047 | -0.094 | |
特征值Eigen value 方差贡献率/% Variance contribution 累计方差贡献率/% Cumulative variance proportion | 20.182 91.738 91.738 | 1.216 5.526 97.264 |
FA-K/(mg · L-1) | 主成分得分Principal component score | 综合得分(F) | 排名 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | Comprehensive score | Ranking | |
0(对照Control) 30 60 90 120 | -1.22 -0.60 0.48 1.39 -0.06 | 0.44 0.31 0.82 0.16 -1.73 | -109.49 -53.23 48.74 128.33 -14.80 | 5 4 2 1 3 |
Table 4 Principal component score table of FA-K on‘Cabernet Gernischet’grape
FA-K/(mg · L-1) | 主成分得分Principal component score | 综合得分(F) | 排名 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | Comprehensive score | Ranking | |
0(对照Control) 30 60 90 120 | -1.22 -0.60 0.48 1.39 -0.06 | 0.44 0.31 0.82 0.16 -1.73 | -109.49 -53.23 48.74 128.33 -14.80 | 5 4 2 1 3 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
包日在, 孔海民, 李岗, 任海英, 戚行江, 张淑文, 张林. 2024. 基施黄腐酸钾对大棚杨梅营养生长及果实品质的影响. 中国南方果树,(1):1-5.
|
|
[3] |
|
蔡倩, 白一光. 2020. 果粮间作对仁用杏生长及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 农业科技与装备,(6):1-4.
|
|
[4] |
|
陈根云, 陈娟, 许大全. 2010. 关于净光合速率和胞间CO2浓度关系的思考. 植物生理学通讯, 46 (1):64-66.
|
|
[5] |
|
陈娜, 王有科, 李捷, 杨娟, 李小刚. 2014. 微生物有机肥对枸杞叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 干旱区研究, 31 (2):317-321.
|
|
[6] |
|
陈屏昭, 杜红波, 秦燕芬, 杨宏贵, 李成树, 莫正芬. 2013. 果蔬品含酸量测定方法的改进及其应用. 浙江农业科学,(4):451-453,456.
|
|
[7] |
|
冯世鑫, 蒋妮, 陈乾平, 唐辉. 2021. 黄腐酸钾钼合剂对山豆根生长和品质及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 江苏农业科学, 49 (15):123-127.
|
|
[8] |
|
高亮, 任万云, 罗波. 2016. 黄腐酸钾在结球生菜上的应用效果研究. 腐植酸,(4):26-29.
|
|
[9] |
|
高伟, 李明悦, 杨军, 冯海娟, 张善平, 郑春莲. 2017. 黄腐酸钾不同用量对番茄产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响. 中国农学通报, 33 (33):46-49.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16100087 |
|
[10] |
|
耿娜娜, 李学英, 顾丁, 刘林. 2013. Folin-Denis分光光度法测定五倍子中单宁酸的含量. 安徽农业科学, 41 (29):11848-11850,11915.
|
|
[11] |
|
何流, 刘晓霞, 于天武, 侯昕, 孙萌萌, 葛顺峰, 姜远茂. 2018. 果实膨大期施用黄腐酸水溶肥对苹果叶片生长、果实品质及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 50 (4):79-83.
|
|
[12] |
|
蒋虹, 张健, 王景明, 刘伟杰. 2020. 《植物生理学实验指导》(第5版)中的几个不足之处. 植物生理学报, 56 (1):11-15.
|
|
[13] |
|
孔繁荣, 李海平, 郭文忠, 武月胜, 郭建林, 周可杰. 2024. 干旱低温复合胁迫下黄腐酸钾对西葫芦幼苗生长和生理生化特性的影响. 山东农业科学, 56 (1):74-80.
|
|
[14] |
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert394 pmid: 24323501 |
[15] |
|
李蒙, 朱思远, 张可馨, 袁童谣, 蔡东升, 申君. 2023. 生物有机肥用量对基质特性、黄瓜幼苗生长生理和营养元素积累的影响. 江苏农业科学, 51 (15):112-121.
|
|
[16] |
|
李松, 朱俊杰, 曾慧, 莫磊兴, 刘红坚, 刘丽敏, 余坤兴. 2005. 黄腐酸在甘蔗生产试验后效研究初报. 广西蔗糖,(3):16-17,39.
|
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
刘霞, 李彩霞, 焦扬. 2019. 河西走廊张掖地区土壤、葡萄及葡萄酒矿质元素特征分析. 中国酿造, 38 (1):179-182.
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2019.01.036 |
|
[19] |
|
刘增照, 郝明德, 牛育华, 王晨光. 2019. 施用腐殖酸肥料对猕猴桃果实品质和产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 28 (2):219-224.
|
|
[20] |
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2017.07.025 |
刘政海, 李六林, 董志刚, 谭伟, 李晓梅, 唐晓萍. 2017. 梅鹿辄葡萄4个营养系果实酚类物质变化研究. 中国酿造, 36 (7):114-118.
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2017.07.025 |
|
[21] |
|
孟阿静, 邵华伟, 唐蕾, 王新勇, 祁通. 2022. 施用不同类型黄腐酸对塔里木盆地密植骏枣产量和品质的影响. 西北农业学报, 31 (10):1357-1364.
|
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
庞晓燕. 2017. 营养液中添加不同剂量黄腐酸对基质栽培黄瓜生长、品质及产量的影响[硕士论文]. 泰安: 山东农业大学.
|
|
[24] |
|
裴斌, 张光灿, 张淑勇, 吴芹, 徐志强, 徐萍. 2013. 土壤干旱胁迫对沙棘叶片光合作用和抗氧化酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 33 (5):1386-1396.
|
|
[25] |
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.025 |
齐晓媛, 王文莉, 胡少卿, 刘梦雨, 郑成淑, 孙宪芝. 2021. 外源褪黑素对高温胁迫下菊花光合和生理特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 32 (7):2496-2504.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.025 |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-1264 URL |
田晓成, 祝令成, 邹晖, 李白云, 马锋旺, 李明军. 2023. 果实可溶性糖的积累模式及其调控研究进展. 园艺学报, 50 (4):885-895.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-1264 URL |
|
[28] |
|
王洪丽, 张彧, 韩洋, 管玉格, 谢婷婷. 2015. Folin-Ciocalteu比色法测定未成熟黄瓜中的总酚含量. 食品工业, 36 (9):262-266.
|
|
[29] |
|
王建华, 任士福, 史宝胜, 刘炳响, 周玉丽. 2011. 遮荫对连翘光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 生态学报, 31 (7):1811-1817.
|
|
[30] |
|
王晓芳, 相昆, 孙岩, 崔冬冬, 亓雪龙, 王来平, 翟衡, 李勃. 2017. 叶面肥对‘巨峰’葡萄光氧化胁迫的缓解效应. 果树学报, 34 (3):312-320.
|
|
[31] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0574 URL |
王艳君, 王蕾, 白文科, 郝燕, 王雪秋, 房玉林. 2017. 甘肃葡萄气候区划与栽培建议. 园艺学报, 44 (4):792-802.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0574 URL |
|
[32] |
|
王艺菲, 辛秀兰, 陈亮, 霍俊伟. 2014. pH示差法测定不同种类蓝果忍冬总花色苷含量. 食品研究与开发, 35 (7):75-78.
|
|
[33] |
|
王义婧, 李岩, 徐胜, 何兴元, 陈玮, 吴娴. 2019. 高浓度臭氧对美国薄荷(Monarda didyma L.)叶片光合及抗性生理特征的影响. 生态学杂志, 38 (3):696-703.
|
|
[34] |
|
吴林, 李亚东, 张志东, 刘洪章. 1996. 藤稔葡萄钾肥施用效果研究. 北方园艺,(3):33-34.
|
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
薛仁风, 丰明, 赵阳, 李韬, 庄艳, 葛伟德. 2019. 不同生物有机肥对绿豆生长与生理特性的影响. 东北农业科学, 44 (4):9-12,71.
|
|
[37] |
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201801.008 |
徐祥增, 张金燕, 张广辉, 龙光强, 杨生超, 陈中坚, 魏富刚, 陈军文. 2018. 光强对三七光合能力及能量分配的影响. 应用生态学报, 29 (1):193-204.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201801.008 |
|
[38] |
|
徐兴利, 金则新, 何维明, 王兴龙, 车秀霞. 2012. 不同增温处理对夏蜡梅光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 生态学报, 32 (20):6343-6353.
|
|
[39] |
|
杨畅, 夏婕, 李秀双, 陈艳龙, 田霄鸿. 2019. “沃得天”微肥叶面喷施对猕猴桃产量和品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 37 (6):193-198.
|
|
[40] |
|
杨雪, 高倩, 蔡林志, 董文, 叶亦心, 秦玉芝, 周华兰, 熊兴耀, 胡新喜. 2022. 新型肥料施用对马铃薯生长和产量及品质的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 48 (5):550-555.
|
|
[41] |
|
殷大伟, 金梁, 郭晓红, 刘梦红, 王海泽, 薛盈文, 杨克军, 张翼飞, 郭永霞, 郭伟, 赵长江, 张鹏. 2019. 物炭基肥替代化肥对砂壤土养分含量及青贮玉米产量的影响. 东北农业科学, 44 (4):19-24,88.
|
|
[42] |
|
张朝轩, 杨天仪, 吴淑杭, 周德平, 蒋爱丽, 叶正文. 2011. 微生物肥料对土壤生态及葡萄叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 天津农业科学, 17 (1):92-95.
|
|
[43] |
|
张敏, 胡兆平, 李新柱, 刘鹏, 王娜. 2014. 腐植酸肥料的研究进展及前景展望. 磷肥与复肥, 29 (1):38-40.
|
|
[44] |
|
张永霞, 张英杰, 巩冠群, 徐恒山, 袁飞. 2021黄腐酸对植物生长作用效果研究. 应用化工, 50 (4):1069-1072,1076
|
|
[45] |
|
张振兴, 孙锦, 郭世荣, 童辉. 2011. 钙对盐胁迫下西瓜光合特性和果实品质的影响. 园艺学报, 38 (10):1929-1938.
|
|
[46] |
|
赵昕, 宋瑞清, 阎秀峰. 2009. 接种AM真菌对喜树幼苗生长及光合特性的影响. 植物生态学报, 33 (4):783-790.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.017 |
|
[47] |
|
宗建伟, 李晓倩, 张创, 赵小杰, 杨雨华. 2024. 盐胁迫对百合生理特性及叶片解剖结构的影响. 华中农业大学学报,(1):166-175.
|
[1] | ZHANG Shiqi, HUANG Lu, CHENG Xi, ZHANG Xiaoyan, YUAN Yuting, HOU Yichen, DAI Dongqing, XIA Xiudong, YUAN Xingxing, CHEN Xin, ZHU Yuelin, and XUE Chenchen, . Influence of Different Sowing Dates on the Quality of Vegetable Soybeans [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 213-228. |
[2] | ZOU Xuexiao, YANG Sha, DAI Xiongze, HU Bowen, XU Hao, ZHU Fan, PEI Songyu, and YUAN Fang. The Rapid Development of China’s Chili Pepper Industry Over the Past 40 Years [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 247-258. |
[3] | LI Guoliang, ZHANG Shifan, LI Fei, ZHANG Hui, SUN Rifei, and ZHANG Shujiang. A New Brassica juncea Cultivar for Edible Stems‘Yuya 702’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 261-262. |
[4] | ZHANG Songyan, DIE Pengxiang, SONG Mengting, LI Zhijian, ZHOU Jian. Effect of Overexpression of Robinia pseudoacacia RpACBP3 Gene on Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics of Nicotiana tabacum [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 2155-2167. |
[5] | JIANG Biao, XIE Dasen, LIU Wenrui, YAN Jinqiang, WANG Min, He Xiaoming, PENG Qingwu, LIN Yu’e, Liang Zhaojun, CHEN Lin. A New Hybrid Wax Gourd Cultivar‘Yacui 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(8): 1979-1980. |
[6] | ZHU Qixuan, LI Xiaoying, WU Junkai, GE Hang, CHEN Junwei, XU Hongxia. Genetic Tendency Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of the Fruit Traits in Loquat F1 Generation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1201-1215. |
[7] | YUAN Quan, LU Wei, WANG Jun, CHEN Ru, LI Yansu, YU Xianchang, HE Chaoxing, SUN Mintao, YAN Yan. Effects of Irrigation Lower Limits on Early-Spring Cucumber Grown Under Different Soil Textures in the Solar Greenhouse [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1377-1385. |
[8] | MA Zonghuan, LI Yumei, WEI Xiaxia, LI Wenfang, CHEN Baihong, MAO Juan. Analysis of Quality and Aroma Components of‘Merlot’Grape from Different Areas in Hexi Corridor [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(5): 1083-1098. |
[9] | FAN Guoquan, YU Jiang, GAO Yanling, LI Qingquan, ZHANG Shu, YU Zhenhua. Effects of Sprouting,Cutting and Coating of Potato Seed on the Occurrence of Rhizoctonia solani Disease [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(5): 1151-1161. |
[10] | LI Dou, WANG Yuhang, WANG Chunheng, JIN Xin, YANG Jiangshan, CHEN Yajuan, DAI Zibo, and FENG Lidan. Effects of Exogenous GABA on Physiological Characteristics of Leaves and Fruit Flavor in Wine Grape [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(4): 815-831. |
[11] | WANG Wenjun, WANG Jingjing, CHEN Qiling, ZHENG Qiangqing. Parameter Determination and Modeling of Central Leader Tree Shape for High Quality and High Yield Production of Ziziphus jujuba‘Huizao’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(4): 832-846. |
[12] | HAO Jinqian, WANG Baoju, TONG Jing, LIU Mingchi, WU Zhanhui, WANG Suna, LIU Ning. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Growth,Quality and Flavor of Hydroponic Chinese Chive [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(4): 847-858. |
[13] | XIA Hongyi, LIU Qiao, PENG Jiaqing, WU Wei, GONG Linzhong. Effects of f-Shaped Tree Shape on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Fruit Quality in‘Shine Muscat’Grapevines with Rain-Shelter Cultivation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(3): 560-570. |
[14] | WANG Haixia, JIANG Yaping, FANG Yan, YANG Xueshan, ZHU Xia. Effect of Exogenous Water-Soluble β-Glucans Application on Glycosidase Activity and Aroma Quality of‘Italian Riesling’Grape [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(3): 571-586. |
[15] | SUN Quan, HE Zhengchen, YE Junli, WEI Ranran, YIN Yingzi, CHAI Lijun, XIE Zongzhou, XU Qiang, XU Juan, GUO Wenwu, CHENG Yunjiang, DENG Xiuxin. Storage with Climacteric Fruits Improves Color and Quality of Citrus Fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(3): 601-615. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd