Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 571-586.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-1237
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Haixia1, JIANG Yaping1, FANG Yan1, YANG Xueshan1,2, ZHU Xia1,2,*()
Received:
2023-03-15
Revised:
2023-11-13
Online:
2024-03-25
Published:
2024-03-22
Contact:
ZHU Xia
WANG Haixia, JIANG Yaping, FANG Yan, YANG Xueshan, ZHU Xia. Effect of Exogenous Water-Soluble β-Glucans Application on Glycosidase Activity and Aroma Quality of‘Italian Riesling’Grape[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(3): 571-586.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-1237
花后天数/d Day after flowering | 水溶性β-葡聚糖/(mg ∙ L-1) Water-soluble β-glucans | pH | 总酸/(g ∙ L-1) Total acid | 可溶性固形物/°Brix Soluble solids | 总糖/(g ∙ L-1) Total sugar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
60 | 0(对照Control) | 3.06 ± 0.00 d | 15.55 ± 0.18 a | 9.13 ± 0.05 d | 98.67 ± 0.94 d |
300 | 3.15 ± 0.00 c | 15.05 ± 0.00 ab | 10.07 ± 0.05 c | 109.33 ± 0.94 c | |
400 | 3.20 ± 0.00 a | 13.93 ± 0.18 c | 12.17 ± 0.05 a | 122.40 ± 0.65 a | |
500 | 3.19 ± 0.00 b | 14.30 ± 0.17 bc | 11.67 ± 0.05 b | 117.60 ± 1.96 b | |
67 | 0(对照Control) | 3.39 ± 0.01 d | 11.63 ± 0.42 a | 11.70 ± 0.00 d | 117.33 ± 0.94 d |
300 | 3.41 ± 0.00 c | 11.05 ± 0.18 ab | 13.43 ± 0.05 c | 131.33 ± 0.94 c | |
400 | 3.48 ± 0.01 a | 10.18 ± 0.09 c | 14.47 ± 0.12 a | 145.33 ± 0.47 a | |
500 | 3.46 ± 0.00 b | 10.68 ± 0.18 bc | 13.80 ± 0.00 b | 135.67 ± 0.47 b | |
95 | 0(对照Control) | 3.42 ± 0.01 d | 10.55 ± 0.18 a | 17.17 ± 0.05 d | 173.05 ± 0.00 d |
300 | 3.44 ± 0.01 c | 10.18 ± 0.18 a | 18.23 ± 0.09 c | 185.50 ± 0.71 c | |
400 | 3.66 ± 0.01 a | 6.43 ± 0.18 c | 20.43 ± 0.09 a | 205.50 ± 0.00 a | |
500 | 3.48 ± 0.01 b | 7.30 ± 0.18 b | 18.40 ± 0.00 b | 188.00 ± 0.71 b |
Table 1 Effects of 0-500 mg · L-1 water-soluble β-glucan treatment on pH,soluble solids,total acidity and total sugar of grape fruit
花后天数/d Day after flowering | 水溶性β-葡聚糖/(mg ∙ L-1) Water-soluble β-glucans | pH | 总酸/(g ∙ L-1) Total acid | 可溶性固形物/°Brix Soluble solids | 总糖/(g ∙ L-1) Total sugar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
60 | 0(对照Control) | 3.06 ± 0.00 d | 15.55 ± 0.18 a | 9.13 ± 0.05 d | 98.67 ± 0.94 d |
300 | 3.15 ± 0.00 c | 15.05 ± 0.00 ab | 10.07 ± 0.05 c | 109.33 ± 0.94 c | |
400 | 3.20 ± 0.00 a | 13.93 ± 0.18 c | 12.17 ± 0.05 a | 122.40 ± 0.65 a | |
500 | 3.19 ± 0.00 b | 14.30 ± 0.17 bc | 11.67 ± 0.05 b | 117.60 ± 1.96 b | |
67 | 0(对照Control) | 3.39 ± 0.01 d | 11.63 ± 0.42 a | 11.70 ± 0.00 d | 117.33 ± 0.94 d |
300 | 3.41 ± 0.00 c | 11.05 ± 0.18 ab | 13.43 ± 0.05 c | 131.33 ± 0.94 c | |
400 | 3.48 ± 0.01 a | 10.18 ± 0.09 c | 14.47 ± 0.12 a | 145.33 ± 0.47 a | |
500 | 3.46 ± 0.00 b | 10.68 ± 0.18 bc | 13.80 ± 0.00 b | 135.67 ± 0.47 b | |
95 | 0(对照Control) | 3.42 ± 0.01 d | 10.55 ± 0.18 a | 17.17 ± 0.05 d | 173.05 ± 0.00 d |
300 | 3.44 ± 0.01 c | 10.18 ± 0.18 a | 18.23 ± 0.09 c | 185.50 ± 0.71 c | |
400 | 3.66 ± 0.01 a | 6.43 ± 0.18 c | 20.43 ± 0.09 a | 205.50 ± 0.00 a | |
500 | 3.48 ± 0.01 b | 7.30 ± 0.18 b | 18.40 ± 0.00 b | 188.00 ± 0.71 b |
Fig. 2 Effects of 0-500 mg · L-1 water-soluble β-glucan treatment on total phenol content in‘Italian Riesling’grapes Different letters indicate significant differences(P < 0.05)between different treatments in the same sampling period. n = 3. The same below.
Fig. 8 Score diagram(left)and load diagram(right)of PCA analysis for volatile compounds in‘Italian Riesling’grape with 0-500 mg · L-1 water-soluble β-glucan
挥发性香气物质 VOC | VIP | 挥发性香气物质 VOC | VIP | |
---|---|---|---|---|
柠檬烯 Limonene | 2.29940 | 乙酸叶醇酯(3Z)-3-Hexen-1-yl acetate | 1.28337 | |
2-已烯醛 2-Hexenal | 2.09885 | 庚醛 Heptanal | 1.21336 | |
香叶醇 Geraniol | 1.89891 | (E)-2-庚烯醛 Heptenal | 1.18945 | |
3-蒈烯Crene | 1.77009 | 2-己烯醛 2-Hexen-1-al | 1.16014 | |
正庚醇 Heptan-1-ol | 1.71916 | 苯乙醛 Phenylacetaldehyde | 1.14430 | |
乙酸乙酯 Ethyl acetate | 1.55693 | 反式-2-己烯-1-醇(E)-2-Hexen-1-ol | 1.13439 | |
反式-2-己烯乙酸酯 Hex-2-enyl acetate | 1.49466 | (E,E)-2,4-庚二烯醛(E,E)-2,4-Heptadienal | 1.12304 | |
叶醇 cis-3-Hexen-1-ol | 1.41633 | β-蒎烯β-Pinene | 1.11425 | |
乙酸己酯 Hexyl acetate | 1.34585 | 正己醛 Hexanal | 1.09048 | |
甲基庚烯酮 6-Methylhept-5-en-2-one | 1.32159 | 癸酸乙酯 Ethyl caprate | 1.01254 | |
肉豆蔻酸异丙酯 Isopropyl myristate | 1.29190 | 苯甲醇 Benzyl alcohol | 1.00957 |
Table 2 Volatile aroma compounds with VIP > 1 based on analysis of OPLS-DA model
挥发性香气物质 VOC | VIP | 挥发性香气物质 VOC | VIP | |
---|---|---|---|---|
柠檬烯 Limonene | 2.29940 | 乙酸叶醇酯(3Z)-3-Hexen-1-yl acetate | 1.28337 | |
2-已烯醛 2-Hexenal | 2.09885 | 庚醛 Heptanal | 1.21336 | |
香叶醇 Geraniol | 1.89891 | (E)-2-庚烯醛 Heptenal | 1.18945 | |
3-蒈烯Crene | 1.77009 | 2-己烯醛 2-Hexen-1-al | 1.16014 | |
正庚醇 Heptan-1-ol | 1.71916 | 苯乙醛 Phenylacetaldehyde | 1.14430 | |
乙酸乙酯 Ethyl acetate | 1.55693 | 反式-2-己烯-1-醇(E)-2-Hexen-1-ol | 1.13439 | |
反式-2-己烯乙酸酯 Hex-2-enyl acetate | 1.49466 | (E,E)-2,4-庚二烯醛(E,E)-2,4-Heptadienal | 1.12304 | |
叶醇 cis-3-Hexen-1-ol | 1.41633 | β-蒎烯β-Pinene | 1.11425 | |
乙酸己酯 Hexyl acetate | 1.34585 | 正己醛 Hexanal | 1.09048 | |
甲基庚烯酮 6-Methylhept-5-en-2-one | 1.32159 | 癸酸乙酯 Ethyl caprate | 1.01254 | |
肉豆蔻酸异丙酯 Isopropyl myristate | 1.29190 | 苯甲醇 Benzyl alcohol | 1.00957 |
香气化合物 Aroma compounds | 60 d | 67 d | 95 d | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β-D- Glu | β-D- Xyl | α-L- Rha | α-L- Ara | β-D- Glu | β-D- Xyl | α-L- Rha | α-L- Ara | β-D- Glu | β-D- Xyl | α-L- Rha | α-L- Ara | |||
柠檬烯Limonene | 0.89 | 1.00** | 0.98* | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.62 | ||
(E)-2-己烯醛(E)2-Hexenal | 0.62 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.23 | ||
正庚醇Heptan-1-ol | 0.81 | 0.97* | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.94 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.60 | ||
反式-2-己烯乙酸酯 Hex-2-enyl acetate | 0.77 | 0.96* | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.55 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | ||
乙酸己酯Hexyl acetate | 0.75 | 0.95* | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.97* | 0.83 | 1.00** | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | ||
肉豆蔻酸异丙酯 Isopropyl myristate | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.64 | ||
乙酸叶醇酯 (3Z)-3-Hexen-1-yl acetate | 0.47 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.50 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.96* | 0.75 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.95 | ||
(E)-2-庚烯醛 (E)-2-Heptenal | 0.88 | 0.96* | 0.99* | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.99* | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.77 | ||
(E,E)-2,4-庚二烯醛 (E,E)-2,4-Heptadienal | 0.83 | 0.98* | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.77 | 0.97* | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | ||
β-蒎烯β-pinene | 0.95* | 1.00** | 0.99* | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 1.00** | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.91 | ||
叶醇cis-3-Hexen-1-ol | 0.45 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.69 | ||
正己醛Hexanal | -0.41 | -0.12 | -0.32 | -0.49 | -0.87 | -0.94 | -0.77 | -0.93 | -0.90 | -0.90 | -0.92 | -0.89 | ||
2-己烯醛2-Hexenal | -0.70 | -0.62 | -0.53 | -0.63 | -0.88 | -0.98* | -0.72 | -0.96* | -0.27 | -0.21 | -0.19 | -0.25 | ||
反式-2-己烯-1-醇 (E)-2-Hexen-1-ol | 0.59 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.83 | ||
庚醛Heptanal | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | ||
甲基庚烯酮 6-Methylhept-5-en-2-one | 0.91 | 0.98* | 1.00** | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.81 | ||
乙酸乙酯Ethyl acetate | 0.93 | 1.00** | 0.98* | 0.91 | 1.00** | 0.95 | 0.96* | 0.98* | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | ||
癸酸乙酯Ethyl caprate | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.98* | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.69 | ||
苯乙醛Phenylacetaldehyde | 0.98* | 0.93 | 0.98* | 0.99* | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.96* | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | ||
苯甲醇Benzyl alcohol | 0.75 | 0.96* | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.97* | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis between aroma compounds and glycosidase in grapes
香气化合物 Aroma compounds | 60 d | 67 d | 95 d | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β-D- Glu | β-D- Xyl | α-L- Rha | α-L- Ara | β-D- Glu | β-D- Xyl | α-L- Rha | α-L- Ara | β-D- Glu | β-D- Xyl | α-L- Rha | α-L- Ara | |||
柠檬烯Limonene | 0.89 | 1.00** | 0.98* | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.62 | ||
(E)-2-己烯醛(E)2-Hexenal | 0.62 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.23 | ||
正庚醇Heptan-1-ol | 0.81 | 0.97* | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.94 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.60 | ||
反式-2-己烯乙酸酯 Hex-2-enyl acetate | 0.77 | 0.96* | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.55 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | ||
乙酸己酯Hexyl acetate | 0.75 | 0.95* | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.97* | 0.83 | 1.00** | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | ||
肉豆蔻酸异丙酯 Isopropyl myristate | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.64 | ||
乙酸叶醇酯 (3Z)-3-Hexen-1-yl acetate | 0.47 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.50 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.96* | 0.75 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.95 | ||
(E)-2-庚烯醛 (E)-2-Heptenal | 0.88 | 0.96* | 0.99* | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.99* | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.77 | ||
(E,E)-2,4-庚二烯醛 (E,E)-2,4-Heptadienal | 0.83 | 0.98* | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.77 | 0.97* | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | ||
β-蒎烯β-pinene | 0.95* | 1.00** | 0.99* | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 1.00** | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.91 | ||
叶醇cis-3-Hexen-1-ol | 0.45 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.69 | ||
正己醛Hexanal | -0.41 | -0.12 | -0.32 | -0.49 | -0.87 | -0.94 | -0.77 | -0.93 | -0.90 | -0.90 | -0.92 | -0.89 | ||
2-己烯醛2-Hexenal | -0.70 | -0.62 | -0.53 | -0.63 | -0.88 | -0.98* | -0.72 | -0.96* | -0.27 | -0.21 | -0.19 | -0.25 | ||
反式-2-己烯-1-醇 (E)-2-Hexen-1-ol | 0.59 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.83 | ||
庚醛Heptanal | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | ||
甲基庚烯酮 6-Methylhept-5-en-2-one | 0.91 | 0.98* | 1.00** | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.81 | ||
乙酸乙酯Ethyl acetate | 0.93 | 1.00** | 0.98* | 0.91 | 1.00** | 0.95 | 0.96* | 0.98* | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | ||
癸酸乙酯Ethyl caprate | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.98* | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.69 | ||
苯乙醛Phenylacetaldehyde | 0.98* | 0.93 | 0.98* | 0.99* | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.96* | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | ||
苯甲醇Benzyl alcohol | 0.75 | 0.96* | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.97* | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
高丽. 2007. 葡萄(霞多丽)浆果中糖苷酶分布的研究[硕士论文]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学.
|
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
郭旭烽, 张艳霞, 王振平. 2020. 喷施不同浓度酵母多糖对“霞多丽”品质的影响. 北方园艺, 463 (16):29-35.
|
|
[7] |
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2016.04.005 |
郭在力, 栾静, 孙玉梅. 2016. 可同化氮对葡萄酒发酵影响的研究进展. 中国酿造, 35 (4):19-23.
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2016.04.005 |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
郝燕, 苏静, 白耀栋, 马麒龙, 张坤. 2018. 摘叶对不同架形‘贵人香’和‘霞多丽’果实品质的影响. 西北林学院学报, 33 (6):133-137.
|
|
[11] |
|
金海红. 2012. 酵母细胞壁多糖对杭白菊抗氧化活性和黄酮类物质合成积累的影响[硕士论文]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学.
|
|
[12] |
|
李爱华, 孙玮璇, 刘玥姗, 陶永胜. 2018. 赤霞珠葡萄β-葡萄糖苷酶活性与成熟指标间的关联分析. 中国食品学报, 18 (4):203-210.
|
|
[13] |
|
李栋梅, 齐慧, 胡宏远, 丁小玲, 马丹阳, 王振平. 2017. 叶面喷施酵母多糖对美乐葡萄果实品质的影响. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒,(5):19-23.
|
|
[14] |
|
李洁春, 宋欣芫, 杨学山, 韩舜愈, 祝霞. 2021. 水溶性β-葡聚糖对霞多丽干白葡萄酒香气的影响. 食品与发酵工业, 47 (22):134-140.
doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.026978 |
|
[15] |
|
李越, 姚冠榕, 陈武, 陈新军, 王军, 潘秋红. 2018. 疏穗处理对‘赤霞珠’葡萄果实糖、酸及异戊二烯类香气物质积累的影响. 果树学报, 35 (2):185-194.
|
|
[16] |
|
刘春艳. 2018. 水分胁迫对赤霞珠葡萄果实挥发性风味物质的影响[硕士论文]. 银川: 宁夏大学.
|
|
[17] |
|
刘玥姗. 2015. 葡萄果实糖苷酶活性、香气糖苷总量及其与成熟指标的关联分析[硕士论文]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学.
|
|
[18] |
|
孟江飞, 杨学威, 房玉林, 张会宁, 张振文, 龚镭, 姜娇. 2012. 不同采收期对梅尔诺葡萄和葡萄酒酚类物质及抗氧化活性的影响. 中国食品学报, 12 (10):155-162.
|
|
[19] |
|
牛帅科, 杨丽丽, 孙聪伟, 陈展, 宣立锋, 魏建国, 赵艳卓, 褚凤杰. 2017. 葡萄芳香物质影响因素研究进展. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒,(4):100-103.
|
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
doi: 10.1021/jf204028d pmid: 22229261 |
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
史星雲, 徐珊珊, 张兆铭, 赵三虎, 王多文, 刘伟, 赵连鑫. 2019. 不同施肥量对酿酒葡萄“马瑟兰”果实香气成分的影响. 林业科技通讯,(9):59-67.
|
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
王晨, 李家儒. 2021. 植物β-葡萄糖苷酶的研究进展. 生物资源, 43 (2):101-109.
|
|
[26] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0304 |
王梦晗, 王凯晨, 马丽, 唐坚, 乔勇进, 张敏. 2015. 酵母多糖处理对樱桃番茄抗冷性及品质的影响. 园艺学报, 42 (10):2068-2074.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0304 |
|
[27] |
|
王世明. 2020. 外源激素ABA和EBR处理有助于葡萄果实品质提升. 中国果业信息, 37 (2):52-53.
|
|
[28] |
|
王琰, 胡容平, 陈庆东, 李红春, 陈松, 夏丹, 廖明安, 范中菡. 2022. 壳聚糖对葡萄果实品质的影响. 湖南农业科学,(4):57-60.
|
|
[29] |
|
问亚琴. 2015. 酿酒葡萄果实游离态和糖苷结合态萜烯的积累及其转录调控[硕士论文]. 北京: 中国农业大学.
|
|
[30] |
|
惠竹梅, 吕万祥, 刘延琳. 2011. 可同化氮素对葡萄酒发酵香气影响研究进展. 中国农业科学, 44 (24):5058-5066.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.011 |
|
[31] |
|
夏弄玉, 孟楠, 任志远, 潘秋红. 2019. 葡萄果实中绿叶气味组分(GLVs)合成与调控的研究进展. 果树学报, 36 (8):1073-1083.
|
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[1] | YANG Jiangshan, CHEN Yajuan, DAI Zibo, LI Dou, SHAO Zhang, JIN Xin, WANG Yuhang, WANG Chunheng. Effects of Potassium Fulvic Acid on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Fruit Quality of‘Cabernet Gernischt’Grape [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(12): 2843-2856. |
[2] | WANG Xiaolong, SHAO Xuedong, ZHANG Zhengwen, ZHONG Xiaomin, LIU Chang, WANG Zhiqiang, WANG Baoliang, JI Xiaohao, SHI Xiangbin, WANG Haibo. Correlation Analysis of Fruit Quality and the Nutrient Level in Plant and Soil of Wine Grape‘Merlot’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2575-2593. |
[3] | HOU Yixuan, ZHANG Ling, LÜ Mengwen, WU Yaoxing, WANG Liangsheng, ZHANG Xiuqing, LI Shanshan. Analysis of Volatile Components from the Petal of Intersectional Hybrids of Paeonia [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(4): 842-852. |
[4] | HUANG Rong, DONG Chao, JIANG Jiao, QIN Yi, LIU Yanlin, SONG Yuyang. Investigation of the Effect of Rain-shelter Cultivation on the Microbial Diversity of Berry Surface for‘Cabernet Sauvignon’Grapes [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(3): 635-646. |
[5] | CHEN Zumin, XIAO Nuoya, ZHANG Yanxia, SHI Xiaomin, GUO Shuaiqi, GAO Hu, WANG Zhenping. Effects of Water Stress on the Volatile Compounds and Related Biosynthetic Genes Expression in‘Muscat Hamburg’Grape Berries [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(5): 883-896. |
[6] | WANG Junwen, WU Yue, YU Jihua, ZHANG Jing, XIE Jianming, FENG Zhi, TANG Zhongqi, LIU Xiaoqi, LI Jing, ZHONG Yuan. Soluble Sugar,Organic Acid Quality and Volatile Compounds Contents in Tomato Fruits can be Promoted by Exogenous ALA [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(5): 973-986. |
[7] | DONG Fei1,WANG Chuanzeng2,SUN Xiudong1, ZHANG Qing3,DONG Yuhui1,WANG Lixia1,and LIU Shiqi1,*. Volatile Compounds in Tomato Fruits Under Different Light Qualities Revealed by Proteomic Analyses [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2019, 46(2): 280-294. |
[8] | HAN Weiwei1,HAN Ning1,JIANG Kaikai2,YANG Mo1,and ZHAO Xinjie1,*. The Influence of the Film-forming Antitranspirant on the Ripening Process of Vitis vinifera‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2018, 45(3): 447-456. |
[9] | WU Lei1,LIU Hong-ru1,CHEN Miao-jin2,WU Da-jun2,ZHANG Bo1,*,YIN Xue-ren1,XU Chang-jie1,and CHEN Kun-song1. Effects of Rain-shelter Cultivation on Formation of Peach Fruit Volatile Compounds [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2015, 42(3): 535-544. |
[10] | WEI Jian-mei;QI Xiu-dong;ZHANG Hai-e;RAN Xin-tuo;and YUE Wen-quan; . The Activity and Gene Expression of Polygalacturonase,Glycosidase and Lipoxygenase in Postharvest‘Jingbaili’Pear Fruit [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2012, 39(1): 31-39. |
[11] | Zhang Zhiyong;Ma Wenqi. Studies on the Requirement and Accumulative Trend of Nutrients in Wine Grape‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2006, 33(3): 466-470. |
[12] | Zhao Xinjie;Sun Yuxia;Liu Bo;Wang Xiao;Shu Huairui. Changes of Volatile Compounds in ‘Muscat Hambourg’for Various TrellisSystems during Maturity [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2005, 32(1): 87-90. |
[13] | Luo Guoguang;Wu Xiaoyun;and Leng Ping. Study on Climatic Zoning for Wine-grape Growing in Huabei Regions [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2001, 28(6): 487-496. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd