Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (12): 2857-2870.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0676
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Haizhen1, YING Yaolin2, WANG Yuqing2, LÜ Ruiheng1, HAN Lu3()
Received:
2024-05-28
Revised:
2024-07-16
Online:
2024-12-25
Published:
2024-12-13
Contact:
HAN Lu
WANG Haizhen, YING Yaolin, WANG Yuqing, LÜ Ruiheng, HAN Lu. Analysis and Evaluation of Heat Tolerance of Actinidia arguta Cultivars in Extreme Arid Area[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(12): 2857-2870.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0676
Fig. 1 Relative electric conductivity of leaves of different cultivars at different temperatures for 1 h Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different cultivars at 0.05 level.
品种 Cultivar | 回归方程 Regression equation | 拟合度 R2 | 半致死温度/℃ LT50 | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|
龙城2号Longcheng 2 | y = 100/(1 + 45.696e0.0857t) | 0.9674** | 44.60 | 1 |
民大Minda | y = 100/(1 + 45.332e0.0910t) | 0.9439** | 41.92 | 2 |
康甜Kangtian | y = 100/(1 + 47.948e0.0975t) | 0.9583** | 39.69 | 3 |
Table 1 The parameters of Logistic fitting equation and semi-lethal temperature
品种 Cultivar | 回归方程 Regression equation | 拟合度 R2 | 半致死温度/℃ LT50 | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|
龙城2号Longcheng 2 | y = 100/(1 + 45.696e0.0857t) | 0.9674** | 44.60 | 1 |
民大Minda | y = 100/(1 + 45.332e0.0910t) | 0.9439** | 41.92 | 2 |
康甜Kangtian | y = 100/(1 + 47.948e0.0975t) | 0.9583** | 39.69 | 3 |
Fig. 2 Relative electric conductivity of leaves of different cultivars at semi-lethal temperature with different times Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different cultivars at 0.05 level.
Fig. 3 The high temperature responses of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of different Actinidia arguta cultivars Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 among different cultivars.
Fig. 4 The effect of high temperature on free proline(Pro)and malondialdehyde(MDA)content in leaves with different cultivars Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different cultivars in the same temperature(P < 0.05).
月份 Month | 品种 Cultivar | 新梢长/(cm · d-1) Shoot length | 新梢基径/(mm · d-1) Base diameter | 叶厚/(mm · d-1) Leaf thickness | 叶绿素含量(SPAD · d-1) Relative chlorophyll content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4月 April | 龙城2号Longcheng 2 | 3.459 ± 0.178 a | 0.118 ± 0.006 a | 0.0022 ± 0.0002 a | 0.554 ± 0.029 b |
民大Minda | 2.299 ± 0.143 b | 0.113 ± 0.004 a | 0.0022 ± 0.0002 a | 0.676 ± 0.042 a | |
康甜Kangtian | 1.644 ± 0.087 c | 0.095 ± 0.004 b | 0.0019 ± 0.0001 a | 0.327 ± 0.018 c | |
5月 May | 龙城2号Longcheng 2 | 3.120 ± 0.161 a | 0.048 ± 0.003 a | 0.0020 ± 0.0002 a | 0.342 ± 0.020 a |
民大Minda | 1.151 ± 0.008 b | 0.045 ± 0.003 a | 0.0017 ± 0.0001 a | 0.321 ± 0.016 a | |
康甜Kangtian | 1.097 ± 0.052 b | 0.033 ± 0.002 b | 0.0015 ± 0.0001 a | 0.281 ± 0.012 a | |
6月 June | 龙城2号Longcheng 2 | 0.432 ± 0.022 a | 0.034 ± 0.002 a | 0.0018 ± 0.0002 a | 0.209 ± 0.011 a |
民大Minda | 0.280 ± 0.014 b | 0.030 ± 0.001 a | 0.0015 ± 0.0001 a | 0.155 ± 0.008 ab | |
康甜Kangtian | 0.109 ± 0.006 c | 0.019 ± 0.001 b | 0.0015 ± 0.0001 a | 0.097 ± 0.005 b |
Table 2 The effect of natural high temperature on growth rates of shoot-leaf and chlorophyll content with different cultivars in field
月份 Month | 品种 Cultivar | 新梢长/(cm · d-1) Shoot length | 新梢基径/(mm · d-1) Base diameter | 叶厚/(mm · d-1) Leaf thickness | 叶绿素含量(SPAD · d-1) Relative chlorophyll content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4月 April | 龙城2号Longcheng 2 | 3.459 ± 0.178 a | 0.118 ± 0.006 a | 0.0022 ± 0.0002 a | 0.554 ± 0.029 b |
民大Minda | 2.299 ± 0.143 b | 0.113 ± 0.004 a | 0.0022 ± 0.0002 a | 0.676 ± 0.042 a | |
康甜Kangtian | 1.644 ± 0.087 c | 0.095 ± 0.004 b | 0.0019 ± 0.0001 a | 0.327 ± 0.018 c | |
5月 May | 龙城2号Longcheng 2 | 3.120 ± 0.161 a | 0.048 ± 0.003 a | 0.0020 ± 0.0002 a | 0.342 ± 0.020 a |
民大Minda | 1.151 ± 0.008 b | 0.045 ± 0.003 a | 0.0017 ± 0.0001 a | 0.321 ± 0.016 a | |
康甜Kangtian | 1.097 ± 0.052 b | 0.033 ± 0.002 b | 0.0015 ± 0.0001 a | 0.281 ± 0.012 a | |
6月 June | 龙城2号Longcheng 2 | 0.432 ± 0.022 a | 0.034 ± 0.002 a | 0.0018 ± 0.0002 a | 0.209 ± 0.011 a |
民大Minda | 0.280 ± 0.014 b | 0.030 ± 0.001 a | 0.0015 ± 0.0001 a | 0.155 ± 0.008 ab | |
康甜Kangtian | 0.109 ± 0.006 c | 0.019 ± 0.001 b | 0.0015 ± 0.0001 a | 0.097 ± 0.005 b |
品种Cultivar | Fv/Fm | Fv′/Fm′ | ΦPSⅡ | qP | NPQ | YNPQ | YNO | LPTF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
龙城2号 Longcheng 2 | 0.74 ± 0.03 a | 0.47 ± 0.02 a | 0.20 ± 0.01 a | 0.41 ± 0.02 a | 2.31 ± 0.11 b | 0.60 ± 0.02 ab | 0.21 ± 0.01 b | 0.43 ± 0.02 c |
民大Minda | 0.71 ± 0.02 a | 0.41 ± 0.01 b | 0.18 ± 0.01 ab | 0.38 ± 0.02 a | 2.27 ± 0.10 b | 0.58 ± 0.01 b | 0.25 ± 0.01 ab | 0.53 ± 0.02 b |
康甜Kangtian | 0.64 ± 0.01 b | 0.39 ± 0.02 b | 0.13 ± 0.01 b | 0.29 ± 0.01 b | 2.89 ± 0.13 a | 0.61 ± 0.01 a | 0.26 ± 0.01 a | 0.59 ± 0.03 a |
Table 3 High temperature response of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of different Actinidia arguta cultivars in field
品种Cultivar | Fv/Fm | Fv′/Fm′ | ΦPSⅡ | qP | NPQ | YNPQ | YNO | LPTF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
龙城2号 Longcheng 2 | 0.74 ± 0.03 a | 0.47 ± 0.02 a | 0.20 ± 0.01 a | 0.41 ± 0.02 a | 2.31 ± 0.11 b | 0.60 ± 0.02 ab | 0.21 ± 0.01 b | 0.43 ± 0.02 c |
民大Minda | 0.71 ± 0.02 a | 0.41 ± 0.01 b | 0.18 ± 0.01 ab | 0.38 ± 0.02 a | 2.27 ± 0.10 b | 0.58 ± 0.01 b | 0.25 ± 0.01 ab | 0.53 ± 0.02 b |
康甜Kangtian | 0.64 ± 0.01 b | 0.39 ± 0.02 b | 0.13 ± 0.01 b | 0.29 ± 0.01 b | 2.89 ± 0.13 a | 0.61 ± 0.01 a | 0.26 ± 0.01 a | 0.59 ± 0.03 a |
Fig. 5 The effect of natural high temperature on physiological indexes of different Actinidia arguta cultivars in field Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different cultivars(P < 0.05),and * indicate significant differences(P < 0.05)among different time in the same cultivar.
指标Index | LT50 | HII | 指标Index | LT50 | HII |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fv/Fm | 0.8627* | -0.9698** | AGR | 0.9360** | -0.9588** |
ΦPSII | 0.9591** | -0.9554* | HII | -0.9298** | |
ETR | 0.9499** | Pn | -0.9694** | ||
qP | 0.9286** | -0.9365** | Chl(a + b) | -0.9274** | |
qN | -0.9285** | Car | -0.9396** | ||
LPTF | -0.9668** | REC | 0.9934** | ||
MDA | -0.9544** | 0.9795** | WUE | -0.9219** | |
Pro | -0.7421 | -0.9499** |
Table 4 Correlation coefficient between growth,physiological indexes and semi-lethal temperature,heat injury index
指标Index | LT50 | HII | 指标Index | LT50 | HII |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fv/Fm | 0.8627* | -0.9698** | AGR | 0.9360** | -0.9588** |
ΦPSII | 0.9591** | -0.9554* | HII | -0.9298** | |
ETR | 0.9499** | Pn | -0.9694** | ||
qP | 0.9286** | -0.9365** | Chl(a + b) | -0.9274** | |
qN | -0.9285** | Car | -0.9396** | ||
LPTF | -0.9668** | REC | 0.9934** | ||
MDA | -0.9544** | 0.9795** | WUE | -0.9219** | |
Pro | -0.7421 | -0.9499** |
指标Index | B | SE | Beta | t | P | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常数 Constant | 5.1000 | 0.3580 | 14.254 | 0.000 | ||
空气温度 Air temperature | -0.0910 | 0.0120 | -0.326 | -7.938 | 0.000 | 2.841 |
饱和水汽压差 Vapor pressure deficit | -0.1300 | 0.0290 | -0.196 | -4.425 | 0.000 | 3.302 |
光合有效辐射 Photo synthetically active radiation | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.252 | 8.657 | 0.000 | 1.420 |
Table 5 Step regression analysis of photosynthetic rate and environmental factors in Actinidia arguta cultivars
指标Index | B | SE | Beta | t | P | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常数 Constant | 5.1000 | 0.3580 | 14.254 | 0.000 | ||
空气温度 Air temperature | -0.0910 | 0.0120 | -0.326 | -7.938 | 0.000 | 2.841 |
饱和水汽压差 Vapor pressure deficit | -0.1300 | 0.0290 | -0.196 | -4.425 | 0.000 | 3.302 |
光合有效辐射 Photo synthetically active radiation | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.252 | 8.657 | 0.000 | 1.420 |
品种 Cultivar | 隶属函数值 Subordinative function value | CE | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SL | LT | Fv/Fm | ΦPSII | qP | NPQ | LPTF | Pn | Tr | WUE | Chl (a + b) | Car | REC | MDA | Pro | ||
龙城2号 Longcheng 2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.939 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.996 |
民大Minda | 0.207 | 0.445 | 0.772 | 0.463 | 0.712 | 1.000 | 0.380 | 0.566 | 0.075 | 0.990 | 0.723 | 0.817 | 0.906 | 0.760 | 0.800 | 0.642 |
康甜Kangtian | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 6 Subordinator functional components and the integrated evaluation index of physiology parameters for different cultivars
品种 Cultivar | 隶属函数值 Subordinative function value | CE | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SL | LT | Fv/Fm | ΦPSII | qP | NPQ | LPTF | Pn | Tr | WUE | Chl (a + b) | Car | REC | MDA | Pro | ||
龙城2号 Longcheng 2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.939 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.996 |
民大Minda | 0.207 | 0.445 | 0.772 | 0.463 | 0.712 | 1.000 | 0.380 | 0.566 | 0.075 | 0.990 | 0.723 | 0.817 | 0.906 | 0.760 | 0.800 | 0.642 |
康甜Kangtian | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0599 URL |
代红军, 魏强, 贺琰, 汪月宁, 王振平. 2023. 油菜素内酯对高温胁迫下葡萄花色苷合成及果实品质的影响. 园艺学报, 50 (8):1711-1722.
|
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
范军强, 武军艳, 刘丽君, 马骊, 杨刚, 蒲媛媛, 李学才, 孙万仓. 2023. 甘蓝型冬油菜气孔特性与抗寒性的关系. 中国农业科学, 56 (4):599-618.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.04.002 |
|
[6] |
|
韩振诚, 李苇洁, 吴迪, 龙秀琴, 李良良, 王加国. 2019. 软枣猕猴桃在贵州适应性研究. 中国南方果树, 48 (6):136-141.
|
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0728 URL |
黄磊, 孙耀清, 郝立华, 党承华, 朱玉, 王贺新, 程东娟, 张运鑫, 郑云普. 2016. 高温对北高丛越橘叶片结构和生理代谢的影响. 园艺学报, 43 (6):1044-1056.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0728 URL |
|
[9] |
|
高俊凤. 2006. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
|
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1023/B:PRES.0000015391.99477.0d pmid: 16228395 |
[11] |
|
[12] |
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.07.013 |
刘敏, 房玉林. 2020. 高温胁迫对葡萄幼树生理指标和超显微结构的影响. 中国农业科学, 53 (7):1444-1458.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.07.013 |
|
[13] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0653 URL |
卢艳清, 林燕金, 卢新坤. 2023. 果皮细胞壁物质代谢及果皮对高温和水分亏缺逆境的响应与‘度尾文旦柚’裂果相关. 园艺学报, 50 (8):1747-1768.
|
|
[14] |
|
马晓娣, 王丽, 汪矛, 彭惠茹. 2003. 不同耐热性小麦品种在热锻炼和热胁迫下叶片相对电导率及超微结构的差异. 中国农业大学学报, 8 (5):4-8.
|
|
[15] |
|
彭永宏, 章文才. 1995. 猕猴桃叶片耐热性指标研究. 武汉植物学研究, 13 (1):70-74.
|
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192390 |
苏小雨, 高桐梅, 李丰, 魏利斌, 田媛, 王东勇, 朱松涛, 卫双玲. 2021. 不同耐热基因型芝麻苗期对高温胁迫的生理响应机制. 华北农学报, 36 (6):96-105.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20192390 |
|
[18] |
|
汤佳乐, 卜范文, 张平, 林文力, 吴念庆, 徐海. 2018. 7种猕猴桃种质耐热性综合评价. 湖南农业科学,(12):21-25.
|
|
[19] |
|
田治国, 王飞, 张文娥, 赵秀明. 2011. 高温胁迫对孔雀草和万寿菊不同品种生长和生理的影响. 园艺学报, 38 (10):1947-1954.
|
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
王振兴, 艾军, 陈丽, 范书田, 何伟, 秦红艳, 赵滢. 2015. 软枣猕猴桃叶片光系统Ⅱ活性对不同温度的响应. 西北植物学报, 35 (2):329-334.
|
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
魏炳康, 李根柱, 王贺新, 娄鑫. 2021. 软枣猕猴桃的光合模型筛选与光响应特征比较. 科学技术与工程, 21 (17):7034-7039.
|
|
[24] |
|
吴久赟, 廉苇佳, 刘志刚, 曾晓燕, 姜建福, 魏亦农. 2019. 不同葡萄品种叶绿素荧光参数的高温响应及其耐热性评价. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 47 (6):80-88.
|
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
张琛, 刘辉, 郗笃隽, 骆慧枫, 裴嘉博, 黄康康, 阮若昕, 赖梦霞, 樊怀福. 2023. 高温对萨米脱甜樱桃幼苗叶片生理指标的影响. 果树学报, 40 (4):817-827.
|
|
[27] |
|
朱根海, 刘祖祺, 朱培仁. 1986. 应用Logistic方程确定植物组织低温半致死温度的研究. 南京农业大学学报,(3):11-16.
|
|
[28] |
|
朱成刚, 陈亚宁, 李卫红, 付爱红, 杨玉海. 2011. 干旱胁迫对胡杨PSII光化学效率和激能耗散的影响. 植物学报, 46 (4):413-424.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1259.2011.00413 |
[1] | YANG Yan, LIU Jun, ZHOU Xiaohui, LIU Songyu, and ZHUANG Yong, . Cloning and Functional Verification of SmWRKY4 Gene in Cold Tolerance of Solanum melongena [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(1): 101-110. |
[2] | FENG Yiqing, QIU Shengnan, WU Yue, XIE Yang, ZHANG Xiaowei, BI Huangai, AI Xizhen. Effect of Exogenous Melatonin on the Cold Tolerance of Cucumber in Solar-Greenhouse [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2633-2644. |
[3] | TANG Haixia, YANG Xuemei, FENG Lijuan, ZHU Feng, ZHOU Jilei, YIN Yanlei. Analysis of Freezing Tolerances and Physiological Differences of Three Pomegranate Cultivars During the Overwintering [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1563-1573. |
[4] | MA Mengyu, HU Yaofang, GU Lin, LI Zhenjian, QIAN Yongqiang, JU Guansheng, LIU Junxiang, SUN Zhenyuan. Effect of Branch Light Treatment on Prolonging the Vase Life of Cut Rose [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1343-1354. |
[5] | YAN Bentao, JIAO Kexin, ZHAO Yue, YANG Qiaomin, CHEN Tao, LU Minghui. Analysis of Heat-tolerant Function of Pepper Vesicle Formation Related Gene CaSec16 [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(11): 2387-2400. |
[6] | YAN Wenyuan, QIN Junhong, DUAN Shaoguang, XU Jianfei, JIAN Yinqiao, JIN Liping, LI Guangcun. The Effect of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Potato Photosynthesis,Tuber Formation and Quality [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7): 1491-1504. |
[7] | LIU Shangjia, L& Yao, CAO Bili, CHEN Zijing, GAO Song, XU Kun. Effects of High Temperature and Waterlogging Stress on Photosynthesis and Nitrogen Metabolism of Ginger Leaves [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(5): 1073-1080. |
[8] | WANG Ying, QIN Yangyang, ZENG Ting, LIAO Ping, ZHANG Wei, ZHOU Yan, ZHOU Changyong. Effects of Citrus Yellow Vein Clearing Virus on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Chloroplast Ultrastructure of Lemon [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(4): 861-867. |
[9] | CHEN Xinghao, LIU Hanqi, ZHANG Xinjian, CHENG Xiangjun, YANG Minsheng, ZHANG Jun. Comparative Analysis of Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Red-leafed‘Quanhong’and‘Xuanhong’Poplar Cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(2): 437-447. |
[10] | PENG Yinxia, ZHANG Ying, ZHU Kangyou, SUN Xin, ZHANG Kemin, SUN Zhouping, QI Mingfang, LI Tianlai, WANG Feng. Light Regulation of Ascorbic Acid Biosynthesis in Horticultural Crops [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(11): 2502-2518. |
[11] | QI Zhenyu, WANG Ting, SANG Kangqi, LIU Yue, WANG Mingqin, YU Jingquan, ZHOU Yanhong, XIA Xiaojian. Effects of Supplemental Lighting at Different Positions on Tomato Plant Morphology,Photosynthesis and Endogenous Hormone Biosynthesis Under Low-light Environment [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(8): 1504-1516. |
[12] | FENG Qian, DONG Lingdi, YIN Yilei, JIAO Yonggang, GUO Jinghua, LI Qingyun, LIU Bingwei, YU Xianchang, SUN Mintao, HE Chaoxing, LI Yansu, WANG Jun, YAN Yan. Improvement of Photosynthetic Capacity and Lycopene Content of Tomatoes by Covering with Light Conversion Plastic Films [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(8): 1517-1530. |
[13] | ZHU Junfei, LI Xin, DONG Kangting, TANG Zhifei, BIAN Xiuju, WANG Lihong, LI Huibin, SUN Xinbo. Effect of Creeping Bentgrass Small Heat Shock Protein AsHSP26.8a on Transgenic Photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(8): 1619-1625. |
[14] | JIA Bing, GUO Guoling, WANG Youyu, WEI Pengfei, YU Tao, CHANG Xiao, HENG Wei. Relationship Between Morphogenesis and Carbohydrate Synthesis of the Calyx-Persistence Fruit and Calyx-shedding Fruit in Differentiation Stage of‘Dangshan Suli’Pear [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(3): 421-438. |
[15] | LI Kai, ZHANG Lili, SHAO Changyong, ZHONG Chongshan, CAO Bili, SHI Qinghua, GONG Biao. Effects of Cold Plasma Seed Treatment on Tomato Seedling Growth and Light Energy Utilization Under Daytime Sub-high Temperature Environment [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(11): 2286-2298. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd