Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1233-1246.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0297
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Wenting, LI Cuixiao, LIN Xiaoqing, ZHENG Yongqin, ZHENG Zheng(), DENG Xiaoling()
Received:
2021-05-10
Revised:
2022-01-24
Online:
2022-06-25
Published:
2022-07-04
Contact:
ZHENG Zheng,DENG Xiaoling
E-mail:zzheng@scau.edu.cn;xldeng@scau.edu.cn
CLC Number:
LI Wenting, LI Cuixiao, LIN Xiaoqing, ZHENG Yongqin, ZHENG Zheng, DENG Xiaoling. Population Genetic Structure of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri in Guangdong Province Based on the STR Locus[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6): 1233-1246.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0297
地理来源 Geographical region | 数量 Number | 柑橘品种 Citrus varieties |
---|---|---|
茂名 Maioming | 29 | 橘红,沃柑,贡柑 Juhong,Orah,Gonggan |
梅州 Meizhou | 28 | 沙田柚,柠檬,脐橙 Shatian pomelo,Lemon,Sweet organge |
江门 Jiangmen | 26 | 茶枝柑,沃柑 Chazhigan,Orah |
阳江 Yangjiang | 26 | 马水橘,贡柑 Mashuiju,Gonggan |
云浮 Yunfu | 26 | 沃柑,砂糖橘 Orah,Shatangju |
湛江 Zhanjiang | 25 | 红江橙,沃柑,茂谷柑 Hongjiangcheng,Orah,Maogugan |
肇庆 Zhaoqing | 24 | 砂糖橘,贡柑 Shatangju,Gonggan |
惠州 Huizhou | 24 | 砂糖橘,春甜橘,沃柑,沙田柚 Shatangju,Chuntianju,Orah,Shatian pomelo |
汕尾 Shanwei | 24 | 贡柑,脐橙 Gonggan,Qicheng |
佛山 Foshan | 23 | 脐橙,朱砂橘 Qicheng,Zhushaju |
韶关 Shaoguan | 21 | 贡柑,沃柑 Gonggan,Orah |
广州 Guangzhou | 21 | 沃柑,贡柑,茂谷柑,砂糖橘 Orah,Gonggan,Maogugan,Shatangju |
清远 Qingyuan | 20 | 砂糖橘,沃柑 Shatang,Orah |
潮州 Chaozhou | 18 | 沃柑,蕉柑 Orah,Jiaogan |
河源 Heyuan | 17 | 贡柑,马水橘,砂糖橘 Gonggan,Mashuiju,Shatangju |
Table 1 Geographical origin,number and species of citrus canker strains in Guangdong Province
地理来源 Geographical region | 数量 Number | 柑橘品种 Citrus varieties |
---|---|---|
茂名 Maioming | 29 | 橘红,沃柑,贡柑 Juhong,Orah,Gonggan |
梅州 Meizhou | 28 | 沙田柚,柠檬,脐橙 Shatian pomelo,Lemon,Sweet organge |
江门 Jiangmen | 26 | 茶枝柑,沃柑 Chazhigan,Orah |
阳江 Yangjiang | 26 | 马水橘,贡柑 Mashuiju,Gonggan |
云浮 Yunfu | 26 | 沃柑,砂糖橘 Orah,Shatangju |
湛江 Zhanjiang | 25 | 红江橙,沃柑,茂谷柑 Hongjiangcheng,Orah,Maogugan |
肇庆 Zhaoqing | 24 | 砂糖橘,贡柑 Shatangju,Gonggan |
惠州 Huizhou | 24 | 砂糖橘,春甜橘,沃柑,沙田柚 Shatangju,Chuntianju,Orah,Shatian pomelo |
汕尾 Shanwei | 24 | 贡柑,脐橙 Gonggan,Qicheng |
佛山 Foshan | 23 | 脐橙,朱砂橘 Qicheng,Zhushaju |
韶关 Shaoguan | 21 | 贡柑,沃柑 Gonggan,Orah |
广州 Guangzhou | 21 | 沃柑,贡柑,茂谷柑,砂糖橘 Orah,Gonggan,Maogugan,Shatangju |
清远 Qingyuan | 20 | 砂糖橘,沃柑 Shatang,Orah |
潮州 Chaozhou | 18 | 沃柑,蕉柑 Orah,Jiaogan |
河源 Heyuan | 17 | 贡柑,马水橘,砂糖橘 Gonggan,Mashuiju,Shatangju |
引物名称 Primer name | 引物(5′-3′) Sequence | 退火温度/℃ Annealing temperature |
---|---|---|
GT1-F | TTGCCACGGGCCAGGGTCGC | 64 |
GT1-R | GCCCAGATGCTCGATCAAGG | |
GT2-F | CTGTGGTGTTGCGAAGTCAT | 55 |
GT2-R | GTTCGCTTGCTTGAGACTGA | |
GT3-F | TCGGCGAGTTCGATCGGGTGCT | 60 |
GT3-R | CTGGCGTGCTGCAGGATGTT | |
GT4-F | ATCGAAACTGTGCAGGCAAT | 55 |
GT4-R | TGGAACAGCATGAGCAGAAC | |
GT5-F | GGACATCGTCTCCCAGCAACCG | 58 |
GT5-R | GCCTGCCACGCTTTTCCGATT | |
GT6-F | GCTCGGCGACTTCTTGATAG | 55 |
GT6-R | AAGGTAAAATCGGGCGACTC |
Table 2 The information of primers used for this study
引物名称 Primer name | 引物(5′-3′) Sequence | 退火温度/℃ Annealing temperature |
---|---|---|
GT1-F | TTGCCACGGGCCAGGGTCGC | 64 |
GT1-R | GCCCAGATGCTCGATCAAGG | |
GT2-F | CTGTGGTGTTGCGAAGTCAT | 55 |
GT2-R | GTTCGCTTGCTTGAGACTGA | |
GT3-F | TCGGCGAGTTCGATCGGGTGCT | 60 |
GT3-R | CTGGCGTGCTGCAGGATGTT | |
GT4-F | ATCGAAACTGTGCAGGCAAT | 55 |
GT4-R | TGGAACAGCATGAGCAGAAC | |
GT5-F | GGACATCGTCTCCCAGCAACCG | 58 |
GT5-R | GCCTGCCACGCTTTTCCGATT | |
GT6-F | GCTCGGCGACTTCTTGATAG | 55 |
GT6-R | AAGGTAAAATCGGGCGACTC |
位点名称 Loci Name | 位置 Position | 长度 Period size | 重复数量 Copy number |
---|---|---|---|
GT1 | 241859 ~ 241926 | 7 | 9.7 |
GT2 | 1065817 ~ 1065895 | 7 | 11.3 |
GT3 | 1441963 ~ 1442079 | 7 | 16.7 |
GT4 | 1884560 ~ 1884621 | 7 | 8.9 |
GT5 | 565742 ~ 565790 | 7 | 7 |
GT6 | 4367068 ~ 4367102 | 7 | 5 |
Table 3 Information of six short tandem repeat locus
位点名称 Loci Name | 位置 Position | 长度 Period size | 重复数量 Copy number |
---|---|---|---|
GT1 | 241859 ~ 241926 | 7 | 9.7 |
GT2 | 1065817 ~ 1065895 | 7 | 11.3 |
GT3 | 1441963 ~ 1442079 | 7 | 16.7 |
GT4 | 1884560 ~ 1884621 | 7 | 8.9 |
GT5 | 565742 ~ 565790 | 7 | 7 |
GT6 | 4367068 ~ 4367102 | 7 | 5 |
Fig. 1 PEGA electrophoresis of PCR amplified bands of partial Xcc strains in Guangdong province with primers of six STR primers A:GT1 primer;B:GT2 primer;C:GT3 primer;D:GT4 primer;E:GT5 primer;F:GT6 primer. M:10 bp DNA ladder;1:CZWG21,2:CHWG1,3:MZSTJ1,4:MZQC8,5:CZWG25,6:DQGG5,7:YJMSJ18,8:MZQC14,9:FSZSJ2, 10:MZQC10,11:MZQC13,12:FSZSJ4,13:MZQC5,14:JMCZG1,15:HZSTJ2,16:HZSTJ9,17:HZSTJ,18:HZWG,19:FSZSJ8, 20:JMCZG6,21:CHWG,22:DQGG1,23:ZJHJC7,24:ZJLM1,25:QYSTJ2,26:HZSTY1,27:JMHNM3,28:MZQC11, 29:MZQC4,30:FSZSJ15,31:YJMSJ4,32:FSZSJ5.
Fig. 2 Relationship between sampling quantity and STR locus diversity The column represents the total number of samples collected from each province(shown on the left axis).
Fig. 3 Relationship between sampling quantity and citrus varieties diversity The column represents the total number of samples collected from each province(shown on the left axis).
样品来源 Sample origin | 样品数量 Sample number | 多样性指数 H Nei’s genetic diversity | 标准误 St. dev |
---|---|---|---|
韶关 Shaoguan | 21 | 0.7989 | 0.0582 |
肇庆 Zhaoqing | 24 | 0.7825 | 0.0933 |
梅州 Meizhou | 27 | 0.7795 | 0.0473 |
江门 Jiangmen | 26 | 0.7766 | 0.0547 |
阳江 Yangjiang | 26 | 0.7665 | 0.0662 |
云浮 Yunfu | 26 | 0.7593 | 0.0567 |
广州 Guangzhou | 21 | 0.7535 | 0.1677 |
湛江 Zhanjiang | 25 | 0.7506 | 0.0438 |
惠州 Huizhou | 24 | 0.7092 | 0.1013 |
茂名 Maoming | 29 | 0.6672 | 0.1011 |
河源 Heyuan | 18 | 0.6629 | 0.0983 |
佛山 Foshan | 23 | 0.6337 | 0.1026 |
清远 Qingyuan | 20 | 0.5957 | 0.1342 |
潮州 Chaozhou | 18 | 0.5710 | 0.2362 |
汕尾 Shanwei | 24 | 0.4925 | 0.1854 |
合计 Total | 352 | 0.7000 | 0.1031 |
Table 4 Genetic diversity of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri population in Guangdong provinces
样品来源 Sample origin | 样品数量 Sample number | 多样性指数 H Nei’s genetic diversity | 标准误 St. dev |
---|---|---|---|
韶关 Shaoguan | 21 | 0.7989 | 0.0582 |
肇庆 Zhaoqing | 24 | 0.7825 | 0.0933 |
梅州 Meizhou | 27 | 0.7795 | 0.0473 |
江门 Jiangmen | 26 | 0.7766 | 0.0547 |
阳江 Yangjiang | 26 | 0.7665 | 0.0662 |
云浮 Yunfu | 26 | 0.7593 | 0.0567 |
广州 Guangzhou | 21 | 0.7535 | 0.1677 |
湛江 Zhanjiang | 25 | 0.7506 | 0.0438 |
惠州 Huizhou | 24 | 0.7092 | 0.1013 |
茂名 Maoming | 29 | 0.6672 | 0.1011 |
河源 Heyuan | 18 | 0.6629 | 0.0983 |
佛山 Foshan | 23 | 0.6337 | 0.1026 |
清远 Qingyuan | 20 | 0.5957 | 0.1342 |
潮州 Chaozhou | 18 | 0.5710 | 0.2362 |
汕尾 Shanwei | 24 | 0.4925 | 0.1854 |
合计 Total | 352 | 0.7000 | 0.1031 |
地理来源 Geographical region | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下)Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
潮州 Chaozhou | 汕尾 Shanwei | 广州 Guangzhou | 佛山 Foshan | 河源 Heyuan | 惠州 Huizhou | 江门 Jiangmen | 肇庆 Zhaoqing | ||
潮州Chaozhou | 0.8748 | 0.6895 | 0.6089 | 0.5849 | 0.5715 | 0.5265 | 0.5229 | ||
汕尾Shanwei | 0.1337 | 0.6742 | 0.6631 | 0.5351 | 0.5638 | 0.6244 | 0.4674 | ||
广州Guangzhou | 0.3717 | 0.3943 | 0.2793 | 0.3686 | 0.7228 | 0.2328 | 0.2480 | ||
佛山Foshan | 0.4962 | 0.4108 | 0.7563 | 0.3796 | 0.8141 | 0.1643 | 0.2785 | ||
河源Heyuan | 0.5363 | 0.6252 | 0.6917 | 0.6841 | 0.6195 | 0.6511 | 0.6915 | ||
惠州 Huizhou | 0.5595 | 0.5731 | 0.3246 | 0.2057 | 0.4789 | 0.3791 | 0.2624 | ||
江门Jiangmen | 0.6415 | 0.4709 | 0.7923 | 0.8485 | 0.4290 | 0.6845 | 0.3002 | ||
肇庆Zhaoqing | 0.6484 | 0.7605 | 0.7804 | 0.7569 | 0.3689 | 0.7692 | 0.7407 | ||
梅州 Meizhou | 0.7301 | 0.7215 | 0.6483 | 0.5979 | 0.7453 | 0.5789 | 0.5709 | 0.6067 | |
清远Qingyuan | 0.7925 | 0.8092 | 0.5564 | 0.5464 | 0.6369 | 0.6862 | 0.5366 | 0.5220 | |
湛江Zhanjiang | 0.8030 | 0.8967 | 0.3130 | 0.3334 | 0.3595 | 0.4773 | 0.2414 | 0.2817 | |
云浮Yunfu | 0.8947 | 0.5997 | 0.7549 | 0.3845 | 0.8932 | 0.5531 | 0.4025 | 0.7441 | |
茂名Maoming | 0.9018 | 1.0651 | 0.5764 | 0.5628 | 0.5187 | 0.9064 | 0.5991 | 0.4877 | |
阳江Yangjiang | 1.0114 | 1.1057 | 0.5873 | 0.5456 | 0.4440 | 0.7583 | 0.4630 | 0.4007 | |
韶关Shaoguan | 1.5174 | 1.4725 | 0.3136 | 0.4148 | 1.0068 | 0.4163 | 0.4614 | 0.3375 | |
地理来源 Geographical region | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下)Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | ||||||||
梅州 Meizhou | 清远 Qingyuan | 湛江 Zhanjiang | 云浮 Yunfu | 茂名 Maoming | 阳江 Yangjiang | 韶关 Shaoguan | |||
潮州Chaozhou | 0.4819 | 0.4527 | 0.4480 | 0.4087 | 0.4058 | 0.3637 | 0.2193 | ||
汕尾Shanwei | 0.4860 | 0.4452 | 0.4079 | 0.5490 | 0.3447 | 0.3310 | 0.2293 | ||
广州Guangzhou | 0.4334 | 0.5862 | 0.7312 | 0.2812 | 0.5619 | 0.5558 | 1.1596 | ||
佛山Foshan | 0.5143 | 0.6044 | 0.7165 | 0.6808 | 0.5696 | 0.5795 | 0.8800 | ||
河源Heyuan | 0.2939 | 0.5289 | 0.6980 | 0.4094 | 0.5953 | 0.6415 | 0.3654 | ||
惠州 Huizhou | 0.5467 | 0.3767 | 0.6205 | 0.5921 | 0.4040 | 0.4684 | 0.8763 | ||
江门Jiangmen | 0.5605 | 0.6225 | 0.7855 | 0.6686 | 0.5493 | 0.6294 | 0.7734 | ||
肇庆Zhaoqing | 0.4997 | 0.6502 | 0.7545 | 0.4751 | 0.6140 | 0.6699 | 1.0861 | ||
梅州 Meizhou | 0.4600 | 0.6639 | 0.4230 | 0.6422 | 0.5105 | 0.3876 | |||
清远Qingyuan | 0.7766 | 0.4559 | 0.3526 | 0.3238 | 0.2931 | 0.4094 | |||
湛江Zhanjiang | 0.4096 | 0.7854 | 0.7504 | 0.1739 | 0.2695 | 1.0007 | |||
云浮Yunfu | 0.8604 | 1.0423 | 0.4722 | 0.3760 | 0.3472 | 1.4062 | |||
茂名Maoming | 0.4428 | 1.1275 | 0.8403 | 0.9781 | 0.1963 | 1.0493 | |||
阳江Yangjiang | 0.6723 | 1.2273 | 0.7638 | 1.0578 | 0.8217 | 1.4630 | |||
韶关Shaoguan | 0.9478 | 0.6640 | 0.3676 | 0.2451 | 0.3502 | 0.2315 |
Table 5 Nei's genetic identity and genetic distance of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri population from Guangdong provinces
地理来源 Geographical region | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下)Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
潮州 Chaozhou | 汕尾 Shanwei | 广州 Guangzhou | 佛山 Foshan | 河源 Heyuan | 惠州 Huizhou | 江门 Jiangmen | 肇庆 Zhaoqing | ||
潮州Chaozhou | 0.8748 | 0.6895 | 0.6089 | 0.5849 | 0.5715 | 0.5265 | 0.5229 | ||
汕尾Shanwei | 0.1337 | 0.6742 | 0.6631 | 0.5351 | 0.5638 | 0.6244 | 0.4674 | ||
广州Guangzhou | 0.3717 | 0.3943 | 0.2793 | 0.3686 | 0.7228 | 0.2328 | 0.2480 | ||
佛山Foshan | 0.4962 | 0.4108 | 0.7563 | 0.3796 | 0.8141 | 0.1643 | 0.2785 | ||
河源Heyuan | 0.5363 | 0.6252 | 0.6917 | 0.6841 | 0.6195 | 0.6511 | 0.6915 | ||
惠州 Huizhou | 0.5595 | 0.5731 | 0.3246 | 0.2057 | 0.4789 | 0.3791 | 0.2624 | ||
江门Jiangmen | 0.6415 | 0.4709 | 0.7923 | 0.8485 | 0.4290 | 0.6845 | 0.3002 | ||
肇庆Zhaoqing | 0.6484 | 0.7605 | 0.7804 | 0.7569 | 0.3689 | 0.7692 | 0.7407 | ||
梅州 Meizhou | 0.7301 | 0.7215 | 0.6483 | 0.5979 | 0.7453 | 0.5789 | 0.5709 | 0.6067 | |
清远Qingyuan | 0.7925 | 0.8092 | 0.5564 | 0.5464 | 0.6369 | 0.6862 | 0.5366 | 0.5220 | |
湛江Zhanjiang | 0.8030 | 0.8967 | 0.3130 | 0.3334 | 0.3595 | 0.4773 | 0.2414 | 0.2817 | |
云浮Yunfu | 0.8947 | 0.5997 | 0.7549 | 0.3845 | 0.8932 | 0.5531 | 0.4025 | 0.7441 | |
茂名Maoming | 0.9018 | 1.0651 | 0.5764 | 0.5628 | 0.5187 | 0.9064 | 0.5991 | 0.4877 | |
阳江Yangjiang | 1.0114 | 1.1057 | 0.5873 | 0.5456 | 0.4440 | 0.7583 | 0.4630 | 0.4007 | |
韶关Shaoguan | 1.5174 | 1.4725 | 0.3136 | 0.4148 | 1.0068 | 0.4163 | 0.4614 | 0.3375 | |
地理来源 Geographical region | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下)Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | ||||||||
梅州 Meizhou | 清远 Qingyuan | 湛江 Zhanjiang | 云浮 Yunfu | 茂名 Maoming | 阳江 Yangjiang | 韶关 Shaoguan | |||
潮州Chaozhou | 0.4819 | 0.4527 | 0.4480 | 0.4087 | 0.4058 | 0.3637 | 0.2193 | ||
汕尾Shanwei | 0.4860 | 0.4452 | 0.4079 | 0.5490 | 0.3447 | 0.3310 | 0.2293 | ||
广州Guangzhou | 0.4334 | 0.5862 | 0.7312 | 0.2812 | 0.5619 | 0.5558 | 1.1596 | ||
佛山Foshan | 0.5143 | 0.6044 | 0.7165 | 0.6808 | 0.5696 | 0.5795 | 0.8800 | ||
河源Heyuan | 0.2939 | 0.5289 | 0.6980 | 0.4094 | 0.5953 | 0.6415 | 0.3654 | ||
惠州 Huizhou | 0.5467 | 0.3767 | 0.6205 | 0.5921 | 0.4040 | 0.4684 | 0.8763 | ||
江门Jiangmen | 0.5605 | 0.6225 | 0.7855 | 0.6686 | 0.5493 | 0.6294 | 0.7734 | ||
肇庆Zhaoqing | 0.4997 | 0.6502 | 0.7545 | 0.4751 | 0.6140 | 0.6699 | 1.0861 | ||
梅州 Meizhou | 0.4600 | 0.6639 | 0.4230 | 0.6422 | 0.5105 | 0.3876 | |||
清远Qingyuan | 0.7766 | 0.4559 | 0.3526 | 0.3238 | 0.2931 | 0.4094 | |||
湛江Zhanjiang | 0.4096 | 0.7854 | 0.7504 | 0.1739 | 0.2695 | 1.0007 | |||
云浮Yunfu | 0.8604 | 1.0423 | 0.4722 | 0.3760 | 0.3472 | 1.4062 | |||
茂名Maoming | 0.4428 | 1.1275 | 0.8403 | 0.9781 | 0.1963 | 1.0493 | |||
阳江Yangjiang | 0.6723 | 1.2273 | 0.7638 | 1.0578 | 0.8217 | 1.4630 | |||
韶关Shaoguan | 0.9478 | 0.6640 | 0.3676 | 0.2451 | 0.3502 | 0.2315 |
柑橘品种 Citrus varieties | 样品数量 Sample number | 多样性指数 H Nei’s genetic diversity | 标准误 St. dev |
---|---|---|---|
沃柑 Wogan | 140 | 0.7884 | 0.0567 |
砂糖橘 Shatangju | 10 | 0.7767 | 0.0999 |
脐橙 Qicheng | 23 | 0.7707 | 0.0584 |
茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 40 | 0.7669 | 0.0539 |
橘红 Juhong | 25 | 0.7656 | 0.0761 |
朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 13 | 0.7624 | 0.0493 |
春甜橘 Chuntianju | 22 | 0.7513 | 0.0730 |
红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 16 | 0.7440 | 0.1205 |
蕉柑 Jiaogan | 9 | 0.7370 | 0.0520 |
茂谷柑 Maogugan | 21 | 0.6955 | 0.0929 |
贡柑 Gonggan | 16 | 0.6133 | 0.1204 |
马水橘 Mashuiju | 6 | 0.6095 | 0.0888 |
柠檬 Ningmeng | 6 | 0.5185 | 0.1477 |
沙田柚 Shatianyou | 5 | 0.4440 | 0.1361 |
合计 Total | 352 | 0.6960 | 0.0876 |
Table 6 Genetic diversity of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri population in different citrus varieties
柑橘品种 Citrus varieties | 样品数量 Sample number | 多样性指数 H Nei’s genetic diversity | 标准误 St. dev |
---|---|---|---|
沃柑 Wogan | 140 | 0.7884 | 0.0567 |
砂糖橘 Shatangju | 10 | 0.7767 | 0.0999 |
脐橙 Qicheng | 23 | 0.7707 | 0.0584 |
茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 40 | 0.7669 | 0.0539 |
橘红 Juhong | 25 | 0.7656 | 0.0761 |
朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 13 | 0.7624 | 0.0493 |
春甜橘 Chuntianju | 22 | 0.7513 | 0.0730 |
红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 16 | 0.7440 | 0.1205 |
蕉柑 Jiaogan | 9 | 0.7370 | 0.0520 |
茂谷柑 Maogugan | 21 | 0.6955 | 0.0929 |
贡柑 Gonggan | 16 | 0.6133 | 0.1204 |
马水橘 Mashuiju | 6 | 0.6095 | 0.0888 |
柠檬 Ningmeng | 6 | 0.5185 | 0.1477 |
沙田柚 Shatianyou | 5 | 0.4440 | 0.1361 |
合计 Total | 352 | 0.6960 | 0.0876 |
柑橘品种 Citrus varieties | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下) Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
沃柑 Wogan | 贡柑 Gonggan | 砂糖橘 Shatangju | 朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 马水橘 Mashuiju | ||
沃柑 Wogan | 0.8995 | 0.8734 | 0.8686 | 0.8109 | 0.7912 | 0.7479 | ||
贡柑 Gonggan | 0.1059 | 0.2483 | 0.7721 | 0.7873 | 0.3055 | 0.6970 | ||
砂糖橘 Shatangju | 0.1354 | 0.7801 | 0.8099 | 0.6818 | 0.2119 | 0.7394 | ||
朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 0.1409 | 0.2586 | 0.2109 | 0.6129 | 0.3873 | 0.4127 | ||
茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 0.2096 | 0.2392 | 0.3830 | 0.4895 | 0.3135 | 0.6870 | ||
红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 0.2342 | 0.7367 | 0.8090 | 0.6789 | 0.7309 | 0.6895 | ||
马水橘 Mashuiju | 0.2904 | 0.3609 | 0.3019 | 0.6619 | 0.5031 | 0.3718 | ||
脐橙Qicheng | 0.3915 | 0.4629 | 0.4680 | 0.7709 | 0.6201 | 0.5974 | 0.5077 | |
春甜橘 Chuntianju | 0.4194 | 0.4457 | 0.6764 | 0.4337 | 0.8294 | 0.8799 | 0.4491 | |
茂谷柑 Maogugan | 0.4527 | 0.4910 | 0.5379 | 0.4302 | 0.8954 | 0.6263 | 0.7093 | |
蕉柑 Jiaogan | 0.4897 | 0.5114 | 0.4224 | 0.3992 | 1.0025 | 0.6673 | 0.5378 | |
橘红 Juhong | 0.5988 | 0.6003 | 0.7078 | 0.5759 | 0.7029 | 0.3832 | 0.9555 | |
柠檬 Lemon | 0.8011 | 0.7167 | 0.6146 | 0.5366 | 0.8371 | 0.5258 | 0.7028 | |
沙田柚 Shatianyou | 0.9087 | 0.9306 | 1.0036 | 1.1194 | 1.1683 | 0.8756 | 1.1206 | |
柑橘品种 Citrus varieties | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下) Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | |||||||
脐橙 Qicheng | 春甜橘 Chuntianju | 茂谷柑 Maogugan | 蕉柑 Jiaogan | 橘红 Juhong | 柠檬 Lemon | 沙田柚 Shatianyou | ||
沃柑 Wogan | 0.6760 | 0.6574 | 0.6359 | 0.6128 | 0.5495 | 0.4489 | 0.4030 | |
贡柑 Gonggan | 0.6294 | 0.6404 | 0.6120 | 0.5997 | 0.5487 | 0.4884 | 0.3943 | |
砂糖橘 Shatangju | 0.6263 | 0.5085 | 0.5839 | 0.6555 | 0.4927 | 0.5409 | 0.3666 | |
朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 0.2602 | 0.6481 | 0.6504 | 0.6708 | 0.5622 | 0.5848 | 0.3265 | |
茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 0.4779 | 0.4363 | 0.4084 | 0.3670 | 0.4952 | 0.4330 | 0.3109 | |
红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 0.5502 | 0.4148 | 0.5346 | 0.5131 | 0.6817 | 0.5911 | 0.4166 | |
马水橘 Mashuiju | 0.6778 | 0.6382 | 0.4920 | 0.5840 | 0.3846 | 0.4952 | 0.3261 | |
脐橙Qicheng | 0.3900 | 0.3817 | 0.3710 | 0.4154 | 0.6468 | 0.3868 | ||
春甜橘 Chuntianju | 0.9417 | 0.7339 | 0.5151 | 1.0140 | 0.8044 | 0.9511 | ||
茂谷柑 Maogugan | 0.9631 | 0.4800 | 0.0623 | 1.2180 | 1.6044 | 1.7646 | ||
蕉柑 Jiaogan | 0.9914 | 0.5975 | 0.9396 | 1.1878 | 1.0596 | 1.7944 | ||
橘红 Juhong | 0.8786 | 0.3628 | 0.2958 | 0.3049 | 1.1395 | 0.9599 | ||
柠檬 Lemon | 0.4357 | 0.4474 | 0.2010 | 0.3466 | 0.3200 | 0.2116 | ||
沙田柚 Shatianyou | 0.9498 | 0.3863 | 0.1712 | 0.1662 | 0.3829 | 1.5529 |
Table 7 Nei’s genetic identity and genetic distance of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri from different citrus varieties in Guangdong provinces
柑橘品种 Citrus varieties | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下) Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
沃柑 Wogan | 贡柑 Gonggan | 砂糖橘 Shatangju | 朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 马水橘 Mashuiju | ||
沃柑 Wogan | 0.8995 | 0.8734 | 0.8686 | 0.8109 | 0.7912 | 0.7479 | ||
贡柑 Gonggan | 0.1059 | 0.2483 | 0.7721 | 0.7873 | 0.3055 | 0.6970 | ||
砂糖橘 Shatangju | 0.1354 | 0.7801 | 0.8099 | 0.6818 | 0.2119 | 0.7394 | ||
朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 0.1409 | 0.2586 | 0.2109 | 0.6129 | 0.3873 | 0.4127 | ||
茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 0.2096 | 0.2392 | 0.3830 | 0.4895 | 0.3135 | 0.6870 | ||
红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 0.2342 | 0.7367 | 0.8090 | 0.6789 | 0.7309 | 0.6895 | ||
马水橘 Mashuiju | 0.2904 | 0.3609 | 0.3019 | 0.6619 | 0.5031 | 0.3718 | ||
脐橙Qicheng | 0.3915 | 0.4629 | 0.4680 | 0.7709 | 0.6201 | 0.5974 | 0.5077 | |
春甜橘 Chuntianju | 0.4194 | 0.4457 | 0.6764 | 0.4337 | 0.8294 | 0.8799 | 0.4491 | |
茂谷柑 Maogugan | 0.4527 | 0.4910 | 0.5379 | 0.4302 | 0.8954 | 0.6263 | 0.7093 | |
蕉柑 Jiaogan | 0.4897 | 0.5114 | 0.4224 | 0.3992 | 1.0025 | 0.6673 | 0.5378 | |
橘红 Juhong | 0.5988 | 0.6003 | 0.7078 | 0.5759 | 0.7029 | 0.3832 | 0.9555 | |
柠檬 Lemon | 0.8011 | 0.7167 | 0.6146 | 0.5366 | 0.8371 | 0.5258 | 0.7028 | |
沙田柚 Shatianyou | 0.9087 | 0.9306 | 1.0036 | 1.1194 | 1.1683 | 0.8756 | 1.1206 | |
柑橘品种 Citrus varieties | 遗传相似性(左上)和遗传距离(右下) Nei’s genetic identity(above diagonal)and genetic distance(below diagonal) | |||||||
脐橙 Qicheng | 春甜橘 Chuntianju | 茂谷柑 Maogugan | 蕉柑 Jiaogan | 橘红 Juhong | 柠檬 Lemon | 沙田柚 Shatianyou | ||
沃柑 Wogan | 0.6760 | 0.6574 | 0.6359 | 0.6128 | 0.5495 | 0.4489 | 0.4030 | |
贡柑 Gonggan | 0.6294 | 0.6404 | 0.6120 | 0.5997 | 0.5487 | 0.4884 | 0.3943 | |
砂糖橘 Shatangju | 0.6263 | 0.5085 | 0.5839 | 0.6555 | 0.4927 | 0.5409 | 0.3666 | |
朱砂橘 Zhushaju | 0.2602 | 0.6481 | 0.6504 | 0.6708 | 0.5622 | 0.5848 | 0.3265 | |
茶枝柑 Chazhigan | 0.4779 | 0.4363 | 0.4084 | 0.3670 | 0.4952 | 0.4330 | 0.3109 | |
红江橙 Hongjiangcheng | 0.5502 | 0.4148 | 0.5346 | 0.5131 | 0.6817 | 0.5911 | 0.4166 | |
马水橘 Mashuiju | 0.6778 | 0.6382 | 0.4920 | 0.5840 | 0.3846 | 0.4952 | 0.3261 | |
脐橙Qicheng | 0.3900 | 0.3817 | 0.3710 | 0.4154 | 0.6468 | 0.3868 | ||
春甜橘 Chuntianju | 0.9417 | 0.7339 | 0.5151 | 1.0140 | 0.8044 | 0.9511 | ||
茂谷柑 Maogugan | 0.9631 | 0.4800 | 0.0623 | 1.2180 | 1.6044 | 1.7646 | ||
蕉柑 Jiaogan | 0.9914 | 0.5975 | 0.9396 | 1.1878 | 1.0596 | 1.7944 | ||
橘红 Juhong | 0.8786 | 0.3628 | 0.2958 | 0.3049 | 1.1395 | 0.9599 | ||
柠檬 Lemon | 0.4357 | 0.4474 | 0.2010 | 0.3466 | 0.3200 | 0.2116 | ||
沙田柚 Shatianyou | 0.9498 | 0.3863 | 0.1712 | 0.1662 | 0.3829 | 1.5529 |
[1] |
Behlau F, Belasque J, Bergamin F A, Graham J H, Leite R P, Gottwald T R. 2008. Copper sprays and windbreaks for control of citrus canker on young orange trees in southern Brazil. Crop Protection, 27 (3-5):807-813.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.11.008 URL |
[2] |
Botstein D R, White R L, Skolnick M H, Davis R W. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics, 32 (3):314-331.
pmid: 6247908 |
[3] |
Brunings A M, Gabriel D W. 2010. Xanthomonas citri:breaking the surface. Molecular Plant Pathology, 4 (3):141-157.
doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00163.x URL |
[4] |
Flávia M S C, Lázara P C C, Rui P L J. 2005. Genetic diversity of Xanthomonas axnopodis pv. citri based on plasmid profile and pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 28 (3):446-451.
doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572005000300020 |
[5] |
Gary B. 1999. Tandem repeats finder:a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 27 (2):573-580.
doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573 URL |
[6] |
Gottwald T R, Graham J H, Civerolo E L, Barrett H C, Hearn C J. 1993. Differential host range reaction of citrus and citrus relatives to citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot determined by leaf mesophyll susceptibility. Plant Disease, 77 (10):1004-1009.
doi: 10.1094/PD-77-1004 URL |
[7] |
Gottwald T R, Graham J H, Schubert T S. 2002. Citrus canker:the pathogen and its impact. Plant Health Progress, 10 (1):15-49.
doi: 10.1094/PHP-2009-0615-01-RS URL |
[8] | Guo Qingyun, Li Fangzhen, Fang Wei, Chen Ling, Zhang Huiqin. 2011. Preliminary study on differentiation of navel orange ulcerative bacteria in southern Jiangxi. Journal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 33 (2):278-282. (in Chinese) |
郭青云, 李坊贞, 方玮, 陈玲, 张慧琴. 2011. 赣南脐橙溃疡病菌菌系分化初步研究. 江西农业大学学报, 33 (2):278-282. | |
[9] | Jiang Xinxiang, Zhou Canfang, Wan Zhong, Liu Yang, Ma Peiqia. 2011. Analysis on the current situation of citrus industry development in Guangdong in 2010. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 38 (5):15-17. (in Chinese) |
蒋新祥, 周灿芳, 万忠, 刘洋, 马培恰. 2011. 2010年广东柑桔产业发展现状分析. 广东农业科学, 38 (5):15-17. | |
[10] |
Khodakaramian G, Swings J. 2011. Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Xanthomonas axonopodis strains inducing citrus canker disease in Iran and South Korea. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 51 (2):194-199.
doi: 10.1007/s12088-011-0103-8 pmid: 22654164 |
[11] | Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7:Molecular Evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology & Evolution, 33 (7):1870-1874. |
[12] |
Lee Y H, Lee D H. 2008. Differentiation of citrus bacterial canker strains in Korea by host range,rep-PCR fingerprinting and 16S rDNA analysis. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 121 (1):97-102.
doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9242-5 URL |
[13] | Long Qin, Xie Yu, Lei Tiangang, He Yongrui, Xu Lanzhen, Zou Xiuping, Chen Shanchun. 2020a. Bioinformatics analysis of MAPK genes in citrus and their expression in response to canker disease. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (11):2095-2106. (in Chinese) |
龙琴, 谢宇, 雷天刚, 何永睿, 许兰珍, 邹修平, 陈善春. 2020a. 柑橘MAPK基因的生物信息及其响应溃疡病菌侵染的表达分析. 园艺学报, 47 (11):2095-2106. | |
[14] | Long Qin, Xie Yu, Xu Lanzhen, He Yongrui, Zou Xiuping, Chen Shanchun. 2020b. Characteristics and mechanism of programmed cell death in response to citrus canker pathogen in the early stage of infection. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (6):1047-1058. (in Chinese) |
龙琴, 谢宇, 许兰珍, 何永睿, 邹修平, 陈善春. 2020b. 溃疡病菌侵染早期柑橘细胞程序性死亡的响应特征及机制. 园艺学报, 47 (6):1047-1058. | |
[15] | Lu Xiaolin. 2013. Study on genetic diversity of Chinese citrus ulcer pathogen based on SSR[M. D. Dissertation]. Chongqing: Chongqing University. (in Chinese) |
卢小林. 2013. 基于SSR的中国柑桔溃疡病菌遗传多样性研究[硕士论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学. | |
[16] |
Ngoc L B T, Verniere C, Vital K, Guerin F, Pruvost O. 2010. Development of 14 minisatellite markers for the citrus canker bacterium,Xanthomonas citri pv. citri. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9 (1):125-127.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02242.x URL |
[17] | Peng Yaowu. 2014. Polymorphism of pathogenic bacteria of citrus ulcer in China[M. D. Dissertation]. Chongqing: Southwest University. (in Chinese) |
彭耀武. 2014. 中国柑橘溃疡病病原菌多态性研究[硕士论文]. 重庆: 西南大学. | |
[18] |
Rademaker J L W, Louws F J, Schultz M H, Rossbach U, Bruijn F J D. 2005. A comprehensive species to strain taxonomic framework for Xanthomonas. Phytopathology, 95 (9):1098-1111.
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-95-1098 pmid: 18943308 |
[19] | Ren Jianguo, Huang Siliang, Li Yangrui, Nong Shifeng, Chen Yongning. 2007. Study on the bacterial strain of citrus ulcer in Guangxi. Microbiology Bulletin, 34 (2):216-220. (in Chinese) |
任建国, 黄思良, 李杨瑞, 农时锋, 陈永宁. 2007. 广西柑橘溃疡病菌菌系分化研究. 微生物学通报, 34 (2):216-220. | |
[20] | Rychlik W. 2007. OLIGO 7 Primer analysis software. Methods in Molecular Biology, 402:36-60. |
[21] | Schubert T S, Rizvi S A, Sun X, Gottwald T R, Graham J H, Dixon W N. 2001. Meeting the challenge of eradicating citrus canker in Florida again. Plant Disease, 85 (4):340-356. |
[22] | Tang Xiaolang, Ma Peiqia, Wu Wen, Gan liansheng, Peng Chengji, Huang Yongjing. 2005. Development status and countermeasures of citrus industry in Guangdong. China Fruit Industry Information, 22 (11):7-9. (in Chinese) |
唐小浪, 马培恰, 吴文, 甘廉生, 彭成绩, 黄永敬. 2005. 广东柑桔业发展现状与对策探讨. 中国果业信息, 22 (11):7-9. | |
[23] |
Wang A, Yu Z, Ding Y. 2009. Genetic diversity analysis of wild close relatives of barley from Tibet and the Middle East by ISSR and SSR markers. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 332 (4):393-403.
doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.11.007 URL |
[24] | Wang L, Guo J, Zhao G F. 2006. Genetic diversity of the endangered and endemic species Psathyrostachys huashanica natural populations using simple sequence repeats(SSRs)markers. Biochemical Systematics & Ecology, 34 (4):310-318. |
[25] | Wang Z K, Sun X Y, Xia Y X, Zhou C Y, Yin Y P. 2004. Rapid detection of citrus bacterial canker disease(Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri)with polymerase chain reaction(PCR). Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 34 (1):14-20. |
[26] | Wei Chudan, Ding Tian, Ye Gan, Liu Qiongguang. 2014. Analysis of genetic diversity of citrus ulcer bacteria in Guangdong and Jiangxi Province. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 35 (4):71-76. (in Chinese) |
魏楚丹, 丁钿, 叶淦, 刘琼光. 2014. 广东和江西省柑橘溃疡病菌的遗传多样性分析. 华南农业大学学报, 35 (4):71-76. | |
[27] | Ding Liang, Cong Yu, Xu Xuling, Qiao Huan, He Silong, Xu Wenjian, Xu Tianshun. 2021. Isolation and identification of a lytic bacteriophage infecting Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 48 (12):2349-2359. (in Chinese) |
肖逍, 丁良, 丛郁, 徐旭凌, 乔欢, 何四龙, 许文建, 徐天舜. 2021. 柑橘溃疡病菌噬菌体的分离鉴定. 园艺学报, 48 (12):2349-2359. | |
[28] | Yao Tingshan, Hu Junhua, Tang Zhike, Ran Chun, Li Zhongan, Zhou Changyong. 2010. Genetic diversity of citrus ulcer bacteria in China using REP-PCR. Journal of Fruit Trees, 27 (5):819-822. (in Chinese) |
姚廷山, 胡军华, 唐科志, 冉春, 李中安, 周常勇. 2010. 利用REP-PCR技术研究我国9省柑橘溃疡病菌遗传多样性. 果树学报, 27 (5):819-822. | |
[29] | Zhang Gebi, Yang Tingmi, Li Xiqing, Chen Zhusheng. 2004. The resistance of citrus varieties to citrus canker caused by Xanthomonas citri. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 31 (2):221-222. (in Chinese) |
张戈壁, 阳廷密, 李喜庆, 陈竹生. 2004. 不同柑桔品种对柑橘溃疡病抗病能力的测定. 植物保护学报, 31 (2):221-222. | |
[30] | Zhuo Tongxun, Gu Dingqiu, Wu Qionghui. 2006. Discussion on the sustainable development of citrus industry in Guangdong. Economic Forest Research, 24 (3):96-98. (in Chinese) |
卓铜勋, 古定球, 吴琼辉. 2006. 广东柑橘产业可持续发展的探讨. 经济林研究, 24 (3):96-98. |
[1] | YE Zimao, SHEN Wanxia, LIU Mengyu, WANG Tong, ZHANG Xiaonan, YU Xin, LIU Xiaofeng, and ZHAO Xiaochun, . Effect of R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor CitMYB21 on Flavonoids Biosynthesis in Citrus [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(2): 250-264. |
[2] | WANG Rui, HONG Wenjuan, LUO Hua, ZHAO Lina, CHEN Ying, and WANG Jun, . Construction of SSR Fingerprints of Pomegranate Cultivars and Male Parent Identification of Hybrids [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(2): 265-278. |
[3] | WANG Mengmeng, SUN Deling, CHEN Rui, YANG Yingxia, ZHANG Guan, LÜ Mingjie, WANG Qian, XIE Tianyu, NIU Guobao, SHAN Xiaozheng, TAN Jin, and YAO Xingwei, . Construction and Evaluation of Cauliflower Core Collection [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(2): 421-431. |
[4] | JIANG Jingdong, WEI Zhuangmin, WANG Nan, ZHU Chenqiao, YE Junli, XIE Zongzhou, DENG Xiuxin, CHAI Lijun. Exploitation and Identification of Tetraploid Resources of Hongkong Kumquat(Fortunella hindsii) [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 27-35. |
[5] | DU Yuling, YANG Fan, ZHAO Juan, LIU Shuqi, LONG Chaoan. Antifungal Mechanisms of Sodium New Houttuyfonate Against Penicillium digitatum [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 145-152. |
[6] | LI Zhenxi, PAN Ruixuan, XU Meirong, ZHENG Zheng, DENG Xiaoling. Development of Duplex Real-time PCR Assay of‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiatics’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 188-196. |
[7] | ZHU Kaijie, ZHANG Zhehui, CAO Lixin, XIANG Shunde, YE Junli, XIE Zongzhou, CHAI Lijun, and DENG Xiuxin, . A New Brown Late-ripening Navel Orange Cultivar‘Zongcheng’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 41-42. |
[8] | ZHU Shiping, WEN Rongzhong, WANG Yuanyuan, and ZENG Yang. A New Very Late Ripening Citrus Variety‘Jinlegan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 43-44. |
[9] | ZHENG Lin, WANG Shuai, LIU Yunuo, DU Meixia, PENG Aihong, HE Yongrui, CHEN Shanchun, ZOU Xiuping. Gene Cloning and Expression Analysis of NAC Gene in Citrus in Response to Huanglongbing [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7): 1441-1457. |
[10] | YANG Haijian, ZHANG Yungui, ZHOU Xinzhi. A New Citrus Cultivar‘Yungui Cui Cheng’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7): 1611-1612. |
[11] | ZHANG Kai, MA Mingying, WANG Ping, LI Yi, JIN Yan, SHENG Ling, DENG Ziniu, MA Xianfeng. Identification of HSP20 Family Genes in Citrus and Their Expression in Pathogen Infection Responses Citrus Canker [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6): 1213-1232. |
[12] | MA Mingying, HAO Chenxing, ZHANG Kai, XIAO Guihua, SU Hanying, WEN Kang, DENG Ziniu, MA Xianfeng. CsSWEET2a Promotes the Infection of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6): 1247-1260. |
[13] | ZHANG Meng, SHAN Yuying, YANG Yebo, ZHAI Feifei, WANG Zhaoshan, JU Guansheng, SUN Zhenyuan, LI Zhenjian. AFLP Analysis of Genetic Resources of Dendrobium from China [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6): 1339-1350. |
[14] | JIA Yamin, XU Hao, HU Wenlang, WANG Yuwen, YE Xin, CHEN Lisong, LI Yan, GUO Jiuxin. Magnesium Deficiency Altered in Iron Absorption,Subcellular Distribution,and Chemical Forms in Citrus Seedlings [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(5): 973-983. |
[15] | WEI Zhuangmin, WEI Sijia, CHEN Peng, HU Jianbing, TANG Yuqing, YE Junli, LI Xianxin, DENG Xiuxin, CHAI Lijun. Identification of S-genotypes of 63 Pummelo Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(5): 1111-1120. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd