https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner1.jpg|#|苹果
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner2.jpg|#|甘蓝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner3.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner4.jpg|#|灵芝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner5.jpg|#|桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner6.jpg|#|黄瓜
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner7.jpg|#|蝴蝶兰
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner8.jpg|#|樱桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner9.jpg|#|观赏荷花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner10.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner11.jpg|#|月季
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner12.jpg|#|菊花

园艺学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 984-996.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0191

• 栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

冰糖橙风味组学解析及风味品质差异分析

孔佳涛1,2,*,付彩霞3,*,吴雅诺1,2,刘  园1,2,胡哲辉1,2,徐  娟1,2,黄  皓4,赵  曌4,陈  磊4,**(120566561@qq.com),陈嘉景1,2,**(chenjiajing@mail.hzau.edu.cn)   

  1. 1华中农业大学果蔬园艺作物种质创新与利用国家重点实验室,武汉 430070 2华中农业大学园艺产品感官评价与品质检测中心,武汉 430070 3湖北土老憨生态农业科技股份有限公司,湖北宜昌 443000 4云南新平彝族傣族自治县农业农村局,云南玉溪 653100
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-24 修回日期:2025-01-31 出版日期:2025-04-25 发布日期:2025-04-25
  • 通讯作者:

    **E-mail:120566561@qq.com

    chenjiajing@mail.hzau.edu.cn

  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1600102)

Flavoromics Analysis and Flavor Quality Difference Analysis in Bingtang Oranges

KONG Jiatao1,2,*,FU Caixia3,*,WU Yanuo1,2,LIU Yuan1,2,HU Zhehui1,2,XU Juan1,2,HUANG Hao4,ZHAO Zhao4,CHEN Lei4,**(120566561@qq.com),and CHEN Jiajing1,2,**(chenjiajing@mail.hzau.edu.cn)   

  1. 1National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation and Utilization for Fruit and Vegetable Horticultural Crops,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China 2Sensory Evaluation and Quality Analysis Centre of Horticultural Products,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China 3Hubei Hanway Ecological Agriculture Group,YichangHubei 443000,China 4Rural Bureau,Xinping County Agriculture,Yuxi,Yunnan 653100,China
  • Received:2024-10-24 Revised:2025-01-31 Published:2025-04-25 Online:2025-04-25

摘要: 对湖南洪江和云南新平两个产区4份商业成熟期冰糖橙果实的理化指标及挥发性物质、可溶性糖、有机酸等风味物质进行测定,并与消费者偏好、风味强度等感官评价结果进行关联分析,旨在明确两个产区冰糖橙风味品质差异,解析与消费者偏好所关联的关键风味物质。结果表明:两份云南冰糖橙的化渣性、香气及整体品质较优,而湖南冰糖橙的有机酸含量高、可溶性糖含量较低,滋味更加浓郁;两地样品果皮挥发性物质种类相同,但绝大部分挥发性物质含量在云南冰糖橙中更高,导致其果实香味更加浓郁,而湖南冰糖橙香味则更加柔和。利用正交偏最小二乘法(OPLS-DA)分析,筛选出35种可用于区分两地冰糖橙风味品质的差异风味物质,其中D–柠檬烯、β–月桂烯、α–蒎烯、瓦伦烯、γ–氨基丁酸等含量高的主要风味物质均在云南地区冰糖橙中占优,仅L–脯氨酸和(E)-2–己烯醛在湖南冰糖橙中含量更高,以上风味物质可作为区分两地冰糖橙感官差异的代谢标志物。相关性分析表明苹果酸、柠檬酸和辛醛、(E)-2–己烯醛分别与滋味和香味高度相关,是影响消费者偏好的主要驱动因子。

关键词: 柑橘, 风味组学, 代谢产物, 感官评价, 消费者偏好性检验

Abstract: In this study,the normal quality,volatile compounds,soluble sugars,organic acids and other flavor metabolites were determined in four mature Bingtang orange sample from Hongjiang in Hunan and Xinping in Yunnan. A correlation analysis was further performed between above indicators and the experiment data of consumer preference and flavor intensity,aiming to determine their flavor differences and identify associated flavor compounds with consumer preference. The result showed that Bingtang oranges from Yunan were superior in terms of mastication,aroma and overall quality. While Bingtang oranges from Hunan had higher organic acids and lower soluble sugars,and hence richer full flavor. In addition,the volatile components were more similar in four samples,while the content of most volatile compounds were significantly higher in peels of sweet orange samples from Yunnan. Therefore,the aroma of Bingtang orange from Yunan was stronger,and the sample from Hunan have a softer aroma. Furthermore,35 different flavor compounds were screened by orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis(OPLS-DA)for distinguishing the flavor qualities of Bingtang oranges between the two regions. Among them,L-proline and (E)-2-hexenal were higher in Hunan samples,whereas D-Limonene,β-Myrcene,α-Pinene,Valencene and γ-aminobutyric acid were more abundant in the fruit sample from Yunnan. And these volatile compounds were determined as biomarkers for the sensory differences of the Bingtang oranges from two regions. And correlation analysis showed that malic acid,citric acid,octanal and (E)-2-hexenal were highly correlated with taste and aroma attributes,respectively,serving as the main driving factors influencing consumer preferences.

Key words: orange, flavoromics, metabolites, sensory evaluation, consumer preference test

中图分类号: