枳丛枝菌根特异性脂质分配模式对干旱胁迫的响应

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0960

园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 1013-1024.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0960

• 园艺植物丛枝菌根研究 • 上一篇下一篇

枳丛枝菌根特异性脂质分配模式对干旱胁迫的响应

张微¹, 尹喜龙¹, 冯曾威², 刘晓迪², 周杨², 朱红惠², 姚青¹^,^*()

¹ 华南农业大学园艺学院，农业农村部华南地区园艺作物生物学与种质创制重点实验室，广东省微生物信号与病害防治重点实验室，广东省荔枝工程中心，广州 510642
² 广东省科学院微生物研究所，华南应用微生物国家重点实验室，农业农村部农业微生物组学与精准应用重点实验室，农业农村部农业微生物组学重点实验室，广州 510075

收稿日期:2025-10-14 修回日期:2026-03-10 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-04-20
通讯作者:
*E-mail：yaoqscau@scau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32570110); 国家自然科学基金项目(32200087); 国家自然科学基金项目(32570127); 广东省农业农村厅“十四五”广东省农业科技创新十大主攻方向“揭榜挂帅”项目(2024KJ19)

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-Specific Lipid Allocation Patterns in Citrus Mycorrhizae in Response to Drought Stress

ZHANG Wei¹, YIN Xilong¹, FENG Zengwei², LIU Xiaodi², ZHOU Yang², ZHU Honghui², YAO Qing¹^,^*()

¹ College of Horticulture，South China Agricultural University，Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops（South China），Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs，Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Signaling and Disease Control，Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Litchi，Guangzhou 510642，China
² Institute of Microbiology，Guangdong Academy of Sciences，Guangdong Academy of Sciences，State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China，Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics and Precision Application（MARA），Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiome（MARA），Guangzhou 510075，China

Received:2025-10-14 Revised:2026-03-10 Published:2026-04-25 Online:2026-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以枳[Poncirus trifoliata（L.）Raf.]为植物材料，丛枝菌根真菌（arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi，AMF）Rhizophagus irregularis DAOM197198为供试菌种，在正常水分（土壤含水量18%）或干旱胁迫（土壤含水量10%）下接种或不接种AMF，通过测定根系和土壤中脂质含量、相关基因表达水平等，以揭示柑橘丛枝菌根特异性脂质分配模式对干旱胁迫的响应。结果表明，AMF显著促进植株生长，干旱1周（低强度干旱）和4周（高强度干旱）后生物量分别提高49.09%和29.76%；干旱显著抑制AMF侵染，显著降低AMF的特异性脂肪酸（C16∶1ω5）含量。干旱1周和4周后，根内特异性磷脂脂肪酸（PLFA-C16∶1ω5）含量分别下降18.59%和61.52%，而中性脂脂肪酸（NLFA-C16∶1ω5）含量分别下降54.08%和46.05%，表明高强度胁迫对PLFA-C16∶1ω5的影响远大于低强度胁迫；正常水分下，NLFA-C16∶1ω5主要富集于根内，干旱促使其向根外分配，而PLFA-C16∶1ω5则主要分布于根外，干旱进一步提高其比例。此外，特异性脂质合成与转运相关基因（PtFatM、PtRAM2、PtSTR、PtSTR2）、磷转运基因PtPT4和糖转运基因PtSWEET2的表达均受干旱抑制。综上所述，考虑到PLFA-C16∶1ω5和NLFA-C16∶1ω5分别与丛枝（菌丝）和孢子（泡囊）的紧密相关性，可以认为AMF通过调节脂质在功能（PLFA vs. NLFA）与空间（根内 vs. 根外）上的差异化分配机制来响应干旱胁迫。

关键词: 枳, 干旱胁迫, 丛枝菌根真菌, AMF特异性脂肪酸, C16∶1ω5, 脂质分配

Abstract:

With trifoliate orange[Poncirus trifoliata（L.）Raf.]as plant materials inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus（AMF）Rhizophagus irregularis DAOM197198 or not，this study investigated the allocation patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi（AMF）-specific lipids in response to drought stress under well watered（soil water content 18%）or drought stressed（soil water content 10%）conditions，in which the lipid contents in roots and soils and the expression levels of related genes were determined. Results showed that AMF significantly promoted plant growth，with the biomass increasing by 49.09% and 29.76% respectively after 1（weak stress）and 4（strong stress）weeks of drought. Drought significantly inhibited AMF colonization，and significantly reduced the AMF-specific lipid（C16∶1ω5）content as well. The specific phospholipid fatty acid（PLFA-C16∶1ω5）contents decreased by 18.59% and 61.52% respectively after 1（weak stress）and 4（strong stress）weeks of drought，while the specific neutral lipid fatty acid（NLFA-C16∶1ω5）contents decreased by 54.08% and 46.05%，indicating the greater effect of strong stress on PLFA-C16∶1ω5 than that of weak stress. Under well watered condition，NLFA-C16∶1ω5 mainly distributed intraradically with drought promoting it to distribute outwards in soils，while PLFA-C16∶1ω5 mainly distributed extraradically with drought further increasing its proportion in soils. Moreover，drought inhibited the expression of genes related to specific lipid synthesis and transport（PtFatM，PtRAM2，PtSTR，PtSTR2），P transporter PtPT4 and sugar transporter PtSWEET2. In conclusion，considering the close relations of PLFA-C16∶1ω5 with arbuscule（hyphae），and NLFA-C16∶1ω5 with spores（vesicles），it is acceptable that AMF respond to drought stress by differentially allocating lipids based on function（PLFA vs. NLFA）and spatial distribution（intraradical vs. extraradical）.

Key words: Poncirus trifoliata, drought stress, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, AMF-specific fatty acids, C16∶1ω5, lipid allocation

张微, 尹喜龙, 冯曾威, 刘晓迪, 周杨, 朱红惠, 姚青. 枳丛枝菌根特异性脂质分配模式对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 1013-1024.

ZHANG Wei, YIN Xilong, FENG Zengwei, LIU Xiaodi, ZHOU Yang, ZHU Honghui, YAO Qing. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-Specific Lipid Allocation Patterns in Citrus Mycorrhizae in Response to Drought Stress[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(4): 1013-1024.

图/表 7

表1 枳菌根共生相关基因引物序列

Table 1 Primer sequences of Poncirus trifoliate genes related to mycorrhizeal symbiosis

基因 Gene	引物序列（5′-3′） Primer sequence	扩增片段大小/bp Amplification fragment size
Actin	F：CCGACCGTATGAGCAAGGAAA R：TTCCTGTGGACAATGGATGGA	190
PtFatM	F：CCGGTCTTCTCAGCAATGGT R：TTCAACAACCTCTCCCCAGA	122
PtRAM2	F：GCTGATTTGGTTCTGGGCAC R：ACCAAGTAACCCTCCTTGCAC	145
PtSTR	F：ACTGGGTTTACGGAGTGCAA R：TCAAGGAACAACAGCGACGG	76
PtSTR2	F：TCGCCGCTGATTTTCGTTTG R：TACGTGTTCCGAGTTGTCGTC	103
PtPT4	F：TCGCTGCAAGTACAGGAAAGA R：ACTGTCAGTTGATCTCCAGCC	73
PtSWEET2	F：TATGGCACGCCCCTTGTATC R：CCAAGCATCCGCACCTTTTT	134

图1 干旱胁迫和AMF对枳生长的影响 WW：正常浇水处理；DS：干旱处理；NM：不接种AMF处理；AM：AMF接种处理。不同小写字母表示处理间在0.05水平差异显著。加粗数值表示显著差异。Int：AMF处理和干旱处理交互作用（Two-way ANOVA）。下同

Fig. 1 The effect of drought stress and AMF inoculation on plant growth of Poncirus trifoliate WW：Well watered；DS：Drought stress；NM：Non-inoculation AMF；AM：Inoculation AMF. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 0.05 levels. The bold values mean significant differences. Int：Interaction between AMF and drought stress（Two-way ANOVA）. The same as below

图2 干旱胁迫对枳菌根侵染的影响

Fig. 2 The effects of drought stress on AMF colonization

表2 枳菌根中AMF特异性脂肪酸NLFA-C16:1ω5和PLFA-C16:1ω5的分配

Table 2 Allocation of the AMF-specific fatty acid between NLFA-C16:1ω5 and PLFA-C16:1ω5 in roots

处理 Treatment	1周 1 Week			4周 4 Weeks
处理 Treatment	NLFA-C16:1ω5/ （nmol · g^-1）	PLFA-C16:1ω5/ （nmol · g^-1）	NLFA-C16:1ω5/ PLFA-C16:1ω5	NLFA-C16:1ω5/ （nmol · g^-1）	PLFA-C16:1ω5/ （nmol · g^-1）	NLFA-C16:1ω5/ PLFA-C16:1ω5
正常Well-watered	215.51 ± 15.25^**	106.16 ± 7.85^NS	2.03 ± 0.11^*	158.89 ± 12.55^**	185.09 ± 33.87^**	0.86 ± 0.15^NS
干旱Drought stress	98.97 ± 17.65	86.42 ± 9.59	1.15 ± 0.29	85.72 ± 12.47	71.21 ± 6.71	1.20 ± 0.18

表3 枳菌根根外AMF特异性脂肪酸NLFA-C16:1ω5和PLFA-C16:1ω5的分配

Table 3 Allocation of the AMF-specific fatty acid between NLFA-C16:1ω5 and PLFA-C16:1ω5 in soil

处理 Treatment	1周 1 Week				4周 4 Weeks
处理 Treatment	NLFA-C16:1ω5/ （nmol · g^-1）	占比/% Proprotion	PLFA-C16:1ω5/ （nmol · g^-1）	占比/% Proprotion	NLFA-C16:1ω5 （nmol · g^-1）	占比/% Proprotion	PLFA-C16:1ω5/ （nmol · g^-1）	占比/% Proprotion
正常Well-watered	—	—	306.66 ± 33.74^NS	100.0	200.38 ± 6.22^*	31.4	437.61 ± 21.35^**	68.6
干旱Drought stress	66.17 ± 41.46	17.7	307.97 ± 23.85	82.3	106.98 ± 41.24	27.3	285.57 ± 27.44	72.7

图3 干旱胁迫下AMF特异性脂肪酸在根内和根外土壤的分配 A：胁迫1周和4周后，NLFA-C16:1ω5和PLFA-C16:1ω5在根内和根外土壤中的分配比例；B：根内和和根外土壤中C16:1ω5（NLFA + PLFA）的总含量

Fig. 3 Allocation of AMF-specific fatty acids in roots and soil under drought stress A：Proportional allocation of NLFA-C16:1ω5 and PLFA-C16:1ω5 between root and soil at 1 week and 4 weeks after treatment；B：Total content of C16:1ω5（NLFA + PLFA）in roots and soil NS indicate no significant difference；* P < 0.05；** P < 0.01；*** P < 0.001

图4 干旱胁迫对AMF特异性脂类合成和转运（PtFatM、PtRAM2、PtSTR、PtSTR2）、磷转运（PtPT4）和糖转运（PtSWEET2）基因表达的影响

Fig. 4 Effects of drought stress on the expression of genes involved in AMF-specific lipid synthesis and transport（PtFatM，PtRAM2，PtSTR，PtSTR2），phosphorus transport across symbiosis（PtPT4），and sugar transport（PtSWEET2）

参考文献 33

[1]	Ali S, Tyagi A, Park S, Mir R A, Mushtaq M, Bhat B, Mahmoudi H, Bae H. 2022. Deciphering the plant microbiome to improve drought tolerance:mechanisms and perspectives. Environmental and Experimental Botany,201:104933.
[2]	Abdalla M, Bitterlich M, Jansa J, Püschel D, Ahmed M A. 2023. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in improving plant water status under drought. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74 (16):4808-4824. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad249 pmid: 37409696
[3]	Calonne M, Fontaine J, Debiane D, Laruelle F, Grandmougin-Ferjani A, Sahraoui A L H. 2014. The arbuscular mycorrhizal Rhizophagus irregularis activates storage lipid biosynthesis to cope with the benzo[a]pyrene oxidative stress. Phytochemistry,97:30-37.
[4]	Chen Xin,Wu Xiaolong,Liui Shengrui,Hu Xianchun,Liu Chunyan. 2024. Effects of AMF on photosynthetic characteristics and gene expressions of tea plants under drought stress. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 51 (10):2358-2370. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0655
	陈鑫, 邬晓龙, 刘升锐, 胡贤春, 刘春艳. 2024. 干旱胁迫下AMF对茶树光合特性及其基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 51 (10):2358-2370.
[5]	Duan S, Feng G, Limpens E, Bonfante P, Xie X, Zhang L. 2024. Cross-kingdom nutrient exchange in the plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus-bacterium continuum. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 22 (12):773-790. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01073-7
[6]	Fan X N, Xie H, Huang X, Zhang S, Nie Y, Chen H, Xie X A, Tang M. 2023. A module centered on the transcription factor Msn2 from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis regulates drought stress tolerance in the host plant. New Phytologist, 240 (4):1497-1518. doi: 10.1111/nph.v240.4 URL
[7]	Feng Z W, Liu X D, Feng G D, Zhu H H, Yao Q. 2020a. Linking lipid transfer with reduced arbuscule formation in tomato roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus under low pH stress. Environmental Microbiology, 22 (3):1036-1051. doi: 10.1111/emi.v22.3 URL
[8]	Feng Z W, Liu X D, Feng G D, Zhu H H, Yao Q. 2020b. Responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to abiotic stress:a lipid-centric perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science,11:578919.
[9]	Han Y, Lou X, Zhang W, Xu T, Tang M. 2022. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced drought resistance of Populus cathayana by regulating the 14-3- 3 family protein genes. Microbiology Spectrum, 10 (3):e02456.
[10]	Jiang Y N, Wang W X, Xie Q J, Liu N, Liu L X, Wang D P, Zhang X W, Chen Y, Chen X Y, Tang D Z, Wang E T. 2017. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi. Science, 356 (6343):1172-1175. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9970 pmid: 28596307
[11]	Keymer A, Gutjahr C. 2018. Cross-kingdom lipid transfer in arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis and beyond. Current Opinion in Plant Biology,44:137-144.
[12]	Liang Shengmin, Zhang Fei, Wu Qiangsheng. 2023. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve drought tolerance of trifoliate orange seedlings by regulating root polyamines. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 50 (12):2680-2688. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-1036
	梁圣敏, 张菲, 吴强盛. 2023. 丛枝菌根真菌通过调节枳根系多胺提高抗旱性. 园艺学报, 50 (12):2680-2688. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-1036
[13]	Liu Na,Zhao Zeyu,Jiang Xiling,Xing Xiaoke. 2021. Review and prospect of researches on the mechanisms of mycorrhizal fungi in improving plant drought resistance. Mycosystema, 40 (4):851-872. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.200370
	刘娜, 赵泽宇, 姜喜铃, 邢晓科. 2021. 菌根真菌提高植物抗旱性机制的研究回顾与展望. 菌物学报, 40 (4):851-872. doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.200370
[14]	Liu X D, Feng Z W, Zhao Z Z, Zhu H H, Yao Q. 2020. Acidic soil inhibits the functionality of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by reducing arbuscule formation in tomato roots. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 66 (2):275-284. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2020.1721320 URL
[15]	Ma J, Zhao Q, Zaman S, Anwar A, Li S. 2024. The transcriptomic analysis revealed the molecular mechanism of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi(AMF)inoculation in watermelon. Scientia Horticulturae,332:113184.
[16]	Ma S, Bi Y, Zhang Y, Wang K, Guo Y, Christie P. 2022. Thermal infrared imaging study of water status and growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal soybean(Glycine max)under drought stress. South African Journal of Botany,146:58-65.
[17]	Olsson P A, Lekberg Y. 2022. A critical review of the use of lipid signature molecules for the quantification of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,166:108574.
[18]	Pei Linjing, Zhang Siying, Zhu Yelin, Ye Liang, Chen Jiabin, Liu Fang, Tan Jing. 2024. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on maize growth and drought tolerance under drought stress. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 37 (8):1731-1742. (in Chinese)
	裴琳婧, 张思颖, 朱叶琳, 叶靓, 陈家斌, 刘芳, 谭静. 2024. 干旱胁迫下丛枝菌根真菌对玉米生长和抗旱性的影响. 西南农业学报, 37 (8):1731-1742.
[19]	Phillips J M, Hayman D S. 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55 (1):118-158.
[20]	Plenchette C, Fortin J A, Furlan V. 1983. Growth responses of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility. Plant and Soil, 70 (2):199-209. doi: 10.1007/BF02374780 URL
[21]	Salmeron-Santiago I A, Martinez-Trujillo M, Valdez-Alarcon J J, Pedraza Santos M E, Santoyo G, López P A, Larsen J, Pozo M J,Chávez Bárcenas A T. 2023. Carbohydrate and lipid balances in the positive plant phenotypic response to arbuscular mycorrhiza:increase in sink strength. Physiologia Plantarum, 175 (1):e13857. doi: 10.1111/ppl.v175.1 URL
[22]	Shi J, Wang X, Wang E. 2023. Mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant growth and stress adaptation:from genes to ecosystems. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 74 (1):569-607. doi: 10.1146/arplant.2023.74.issue-1 URL
[23]	Tang B, Man J, Lehmann A, Rillig M C. 2024. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi attenuate negative impact of drought on soil functions. Global Change Biology, 30 (7):e17409. doi: 10.1111/gcb.v30.7 URL
[24]	Trouvelot A. 1986. Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d'un systeme radiculaire. Recherche de methods d'estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle//Gianinazzi-Pearson V,Gianinazzi S. Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorrhizae. Paris:INRA:217-221.
[25]	Wang F, Zhang L, Zhou J, Rengel Z, George T S, Feng G. 2022. Exploring the secrets of hyphosphere of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi:processes and ecological functions. Plant and Soil, 481 (1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05621-z
[26]	Wang Y, Zou Y N, Shu B, Wu Q S. 2023. Deciphering molecular mechanisms regarding enhanced drought tolerance in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Scientia Horticulturae,308:111591.
[27]	Wang Z, Zhang S, Liang J, Chen H, Jiang Z, Hu W, Tang M. 2025. Rhizophagus irregularis regulates RiCPSI and RiCARI expression to influence plant drought tolerance. Plant Physiology, 197 (1):kiae645.
[28]	Wu Q S, He J D, Srivastava A K, Zou Y N, Kuča K. 2019. Mycorrhizas enhance drought tolerance of citrus by altering root fatty acid compositions and their saturation levels. Tree Physiology, 39 (7):1149-1158. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz039 URL
[29]	Zhang Bin,Zhang Haocheng,Qiao Tian,Lü Zhibing,Xu Yanan,Li Xueqin,Yuan Xiangyang,Feng Meichen,Zhang Meijun. 2025. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on non-structural carbohydrates and C,N and P stoichiometry in oat plants under drought stress. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,49:1082-1095. (in Chinese)
	张斌, 张浩成, 乔天, 吕治兵, 许亚男, 李雪芹, 原向阳, 冯美臣, 张美俊. 2025. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫燕麦非结构性碳水化合物及碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响. 植物生态学报,49:1082-1095.
[30]	Zhang W, Xia K L, Feng Z W, Qin Y Q, Zhou Y, Feng G D, Zhu H H, Yao Q. 2024a. Tomato plant growth promotion and drought tolerance conferred by three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is mediated by lipid metabolism. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,208:108478.
[31]	Zhang W, Yin X L, Feng Z W, Liu X D, Zhu F W, Zhu H H, Yao Q. 2024b. Drought stress reduces arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of Poncirus trifoliata(L.) roots and plant growth promotion via lipid metabolism. Frontiers in Plant Science,15:1452202.
[32]	Zhang W, Zhou Y, Qin Y Q, Feng Z W, Zhu F W, Feng G D, Zhu H H, Yao Q. 2024c. Lipids mediate arbuscule development and senescence in tomato roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizae fungus under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72 (34):18851-18863. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c04769 URL
[33]	Zou Y N, Liu X Q, He W X, Xu X H, Xu Y J, Hashem A, Abd Allah E F, Wu Q S. 2024. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and intercropping Vicia villosa mediate plant biomass,soil properties,and rhizosphere metabolite profiles of walnuts. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture,11:159.

枳丛枝菌根特异性脂质分配模式对干旱胁迫的响应

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-Specific Lipid Allocation Patterns in Citrus Mycorrhizae in Response to Drought Stress

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数:

[1]	于淼, 黄圣宇, 潘志勇. 枳丛枝菌根共生相关硝酸盐转运蛋白基因PtNPF5.2的功能鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 1025-1037.
[2]	高雅文, 孙琳佼, 刘宇松, 孙文泰, 徐明娜, 宋乐芬, 王雪梅, 王功帅, 王玫, 尹承苗, 毛志泉. 丛枝菌根真菌与嗜松篮状菌LZ1协同缓解苹果连作障碍的机理研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 1038-1056.
[3]	芮文婧, 李静, 张婧, 张潇丹, 王成, 颉建明. 植物—丛枝菌根真菌—根际微生物协同作用的机制与调控[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 923-937.
[4]	李枫, 严文辉, 冷灏, 向丹, 梁斌, 李敏, 李宝深, 张林. 丛枝菌根真菌在园艺作物上的应用进展与展望[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 938-954.
[5]	叶国健, 冯曾威, 刘晓迪, 陈猛, 谢小林, 姚青, 邓名荣, 朱红惠. 果园生态系统AM真菌：多样性、环境响应及其增强果树抗逆性的机制[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 955-971.
[6]	肖旺, 张菲, 郑凤玲, 邹英宁, 吴强盛. 丛枝菌根真菌增强果树抗旱性的机制与应用挑战[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 972-984.
[7]	臧娇娇, 石兆勇, 张尚龙, 孙亚杰, 肖靖贻, 吴姗薇, 高佳凯, 张鑫, 多勇昊. 牡丹丛枝菌根真菌多样性及其功能研究进展、问题与展望[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(4): 985-996.
[8]	王艳秋, 班景洁, 曾宇涵, 赖春旺, 黄晓铃, 周建金, 万奎, 赖钟雄, 林玉玲. 多花黄精DREB基因家族鉴定及其在盐胁迫下的响应分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(1): 159-173.
[9]	朱存兰, 范军亮, 王凯彤, 韦孟, 杨亮, 刘昊天, 司怀军, 张宁. 马铃薯StRGLG1调控干旱胁迫响应的功能研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(9): 2329-2342.
[10]	杜丽君, 刘英材, 史妍妍, 汪洋, 李春晖, 何银涛, 王旭, 边传杰, 张满让. 丛枝菌根真菌对苹果品种耐盐碱的影响及缓解机理[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(9): 2410-2424.
[11]	赵玉璞, 白一涵, 侯赛赛, 蒲子天, 乜兰春, 李青云, 王鑫鑫. 丛枝菌根真菌缓解设施蔬菜土壤连作障碍研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(8): 2166-2186.
[12]	周天, 吕帅丽, 韩晗, 李雨佳, 刘海强, 刘永忠. 外源独脚金内酯对枳幼苗茎增粗生长的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(7): 1843-1854.
[13]	萧志浩, 郑涵锴, 张曼楠, 唐怀千, 王嘉颖, 张余洋, 张俊红, 叶志彪, 叶杰. 非生物胁迫下钾对番茄苗期生长发育的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(6): 1599-1618.
[14]	李敖, 郑旭, 吴承勖, 聂瑞宁, 姬新颖, 唐佳莉, 张俊佩. 丛枝菌根真菌对盐胁迫下核桃幼苗生长及生理的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(2): 423-438.
[15]	李超楠, 李璐, 高丹蕾, 乔红雍, 袁涛. 原产地与引种地大花黄牡丹根系和根际土壤的AMF群落差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(2): 467-480.

枳丛枝菌根特异性脂质分配模式对干旱胁迫的响应

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-Specific Lipid Allocation Patterns in Citrus Mycorrhizae in Response to Drought Stress

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问总数: 当日访问总数: 当前在线人数:

访问总数:　当日访问总数:　当前在线人数: