园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1613-1622.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0653
田振东, 田启航, 李杰, 刘国俭, 王雨, 王召元, 常瑞丰, 李永红*(
)
收稿日期:2026-01-15
修回日期:2026-05-13
出版日期:2026-06-24
发布日期:2026-06-24
通讯作者:
基金资助:
TIAN Zhendong, TIAN Qihang, LI Jie, LIU Guojian, WANG Yu, WANG Zhaoyuan, CHANG Ruifeng, LI Yonghong*(
)
Received:2026-01-15
Revised:2026-05-13
Published:2026-06-24
Online:2026-06-24
Contact:
摘要:
调查了河北省秦皇岛市两个试验点2025年倒春寒发生后164个桃品种及438株‘东合1号’ב21世纪’桃杂交群体单株的花芽受冻率。结果表明,164个桃品种的花芽受冻率符合数量性状的分布特点,整体呈偏正态分布,品种的坐果数量与花芽受冻率具有显著的负相关;树体上部的花芽受冻率显著低于树体下部,且两者显著正相关。杂交群体花芽受冻率整体偏高,绝大多数单株的花芽不耐0 ℃以下低温,与亲本相比出现了性状衰退。除了品种特性,株行距宽、水分适量、树龄较大、南向阳面背风植株花芽的受冻率较低。此外,还筛选出了11个抗倒春寒的桃品种,可用于抗倒春寒育种及引种。
田振东, 田启航, 李杰, 刘国俭, 王雨, 王召元, 常瑞丰, 李永红. 164个桃品种倒春寒后花芽冻害调查与分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(6): 1613-1622.
TIAN Zhendong, TIAN Qihang, LI Jie, LIU Guojian, WANG Yu, WANG Zhaoyuan, CHANG Ruifeng, LI Yonghong. Investigation and Analysis of the Flower Bud Freezing Injury in 164 Peach Cultivars After Late Spring Coldness[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(6): 1613-1622.
| 试验点 Experimental field | 面积/m2 Area | 品种数 Number of cultivars | 株行距/(m × m) The plant spacing | 灌溉方式 Irrigation method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 孔庄2区Kongzhuang Experimental field 2 | 8 000 | 25 | 2.5 × 4.5 | 滴灌Trickle irrigation | ||
| 孔庄3区Kongzhuang Experimental field 3 | 4 300 | 39 | 1.5 × 4.5 | 喷灌Spray irrigation | ||
| 孔庄4区Kongzhuang Experimental field 4 | 5 700 | 82 | 2.5 × 4.5 | 微喷Micro-sprinkler irrigation | ||
| 施各庄1区Shigezhuang Experimental field 1 | 6 600 | 12 | 2.5 × 4.5 | 滴灌Trickle irrigation | ||
| 施各庄5区Shigezhuang Experimental field 5 | 2 300 | 6 | 2.0 × 4.5 | 滴灌Trickle irrigation | ||
| 总计Total | 164 | |||||
表1 所有试验点对应的品种数及栽培管理方式
Table 1 The number of cultivars and cultural methods of all the experimental fields
| 试验点 Experimental field | 面积/m2 Area | 品种数 Number of cultivars | 株行距/(m × m) The plant spacing | 灌溉方式 Irrigation method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 孔庄2区Kongzhuang Experimental field 2 | 8 000 | 25 | 2.5 × 4.5 | 滴灌Trickle irrigation | ||
| 孔庄3区Kongzhuang Experimental field 3 | 4 300 | 39 | 1.5 × 4.5 | 喷灌Spray irrigation | ||
| 孔庄4区Kongzhuang Experimental field 4 | 5 700 | 82 | 2.5 × 4.5 | 微喷Micro-sprinkler irrigation | ||
| 施各庄1区Shigezhuang Experimental field 1 | 6 600 | 12 | 2.5 × 4.5 | 滴灌Trickle irrigation | ||
| 施各庄5区Shigezhuang Experimental field 5 | 2 300 | 6 | 2.0 × 4.5 | 滴灌Trickle irrigation | ||
| 总计Total | 164 | |||||
图1 倒春寒发生后花芽及幼果冻害症状 A:受冻花芽及未受冻花芽纵切对比(上:受冻花芽;下:未受冻花芽);B:倒春寒发生后的一年生枝条;C、D:冻害后发育不良的幼果
Fig. 1 The frost damage of flower buds and young fruits after late spring coldness A:The comparison of longitudinal section of frozen flower buds and unfrozen flower buds(top:frozen flower buds;bottom:unfrozen flower buds);B:The annual branches after late spring coldness;C and D:The stunted young fruits after frost damage
| 树体位置 The position of tree | 平均受冻率/% Average of flower bud freezing injury rate | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上部 Upper | 50 | 0.01 | -1.10 | 0.60 | |
| 下部 Lower | 57*** | -0.29 | -0.95 |
表2 164个桃品种树体上部及下部花芽受冻率正态性检验及差异分析和品种内的相关性
Table 2 Normality test and significant difference analysis of the flower bud freezing injury rates in upper and lower trees of 164 peach cultivars and the correlation within cultivars
| 树体位置 The position of tree | 平均受冻率/% Average of flower bud freezing injury rate | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上部 Upper | 50 | 0.01 | -1.10 | 0.60 | |
| 下部 Lower | 57*** | -0.29 | -0.95 |
图3 2025年3月29和30日倒春寒发生的2 d孔庄及施各庄基地气温变化情况
Fig. 3 Temperature changes at Kongzhuang and Shigezhuang experimental fields during the two-day late spring coldness period on March 29 and 30,2025
| 试验点 Experimental field | 夜间平均气温/℃ The average nighttime temperature | 夜间最低温度/℃ The nocturnal minimum temperature | 夜间气温<-5 ℃持续时长/h The hours of temperature remained below-5 ℃ | 花芽受冻率/% The flower bud freezing injury rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03-29 | 03-30 | 03-29 | 03-30 | 03-29 | 03-30 | 树体上部Upper | 树体下部Lower | |
| 孔庄Kongzhuang | -4.9 | -6.2 | -7.9 | -7.9 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 51 | 58 |
| 施各庄Shigezhuang | -5.2 | -0.3 | -7.2 | -4.7 | 3.75 | 0 | 40 | 56 |
表3 倒春寒发生的2 d内孔庄及施各庄基地气温及花芽受冻情况
Table 3 The temperature and flower bud freezing injury rates at Kongzhuang and Shigezhuang experimental fields within the two days when the late spring coldness occurred
| 试验点 Experimental field | 夜间平均气温/℃ The average nighttime temperature | 夜间最低温度/℃ The nocturnal minimum temperature | 夜间气温<-5 ℃持续时长/h The hours of temperature remained below-5 ℃ | 花芽受冻率/% The flower bud freezing injury rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03-29 | 03-30 | 03-29 | 03-30 | 03-29 | 03-30 | 树体上部Upper | 树体下部Lower | |
| 孔庄Kongzhuang | -4.9 | -6.2 | -7.9 | -7.9 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 51 | 58 |
| 施各庄Shigezhuang | -5.2 | -0.3 | -7.2 | -4.7 | 3.75 | 0 | 40 | 56 |
图4 花芽受冻率在不同试验点间比较分析 孔2、孔3、孔4:孔庄2区、3区、4区试验点;施1、施5:施各庄1区、5区试验点。差异显著性分析方法为单因素方差分析,不同小写字母表示差异显著(P < 0.05)。下同
Fig. 4 Comparative analysis of the flower bud freezing injury rates among different experimental fields Kong 2,Kong 3,Kong 4:The three experimental fields in Kongzhuang 2/3/4;Shi 1,Shi 5:The two experimental fields in Shigezhuang 1/5. The difference significance was analyzed using One-way ANOVA,different lowercase letters indicate significant differences(P < 0.05). The same below
| 品种名 Cultivar name | 树体下部花芽受冻率/% The flower bud freezing injury rates in upper trees | 树体上部花芽受冻率/% The flower bud freezing injury rates in lower trees | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3年 3 years | 8年 8 years | 3年 3 years | 8年 8 years | |
| 寒公主 Hangongzhu | 60 | 80 | 65 | 40 |
| 金霞早油蟠 Jinxiazao Youpan | 100 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| 中桃金阳 Zhongtao Jinyang | 85 | 35 | 80 | 50 |
| 瑞蟠25 Ruipan 25 | 70 | 40 | 85 | 30 |
| 中桃绯玉 Zhongtao Feiyu | 80 | 55 | 80 | 45 |
| 中油15 Zhongyoutao 15 | 30 | 10 | 40 | 40 |
| 中油20 Zhongyoutao 20 | 25 | 23 | 35 | 5 |
| 紫金红3 Zijinhong 3 | 65 | 40 | 70 | 50 |
| 中油蟠7 Zhongyoupan 7 | 70 | 40 | 70 | 45 |
表4 相同品种不同树龄的花芽受冻率比较分析
Table 4 Comparative analysis of the flower bud freezing injury rates in the same cultivars with different tree ages
| 品种名 Cultivar name | 树体下部花芽受冻率/% The flower bud freezing injury rates in upper trees | 树体上部花芽受冻率/% The flower bud freezing injury rates in lower trees | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3年 3 years | 8年 8 years | 3年 3 years | 8年 8 years | |
| 寒公主 Hangongzhu | 60 | 80 | 65 | 40 |
| 金霞早油蟠 Jinxiazao Youpan | 100 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| 中桃金阳 Zhongtao Jinyang | 85 | 35 | 80 | 50 |
| 瑞蟠25 Ruipan 25 | 70 | 40 | 85 | 30 |
| 中桃绯玉 Zhongtao Feiyu | 80 | 55 | 80 | 45 |
| 中油15 Zhongyoutao 15 | 30 | 10 | 40 | 40 |
| 中油20 Zhongyoutao 20 | 25 | 23 | 35 | 5 |
| 紫金红3 Zijinhong 3 | 65 | 40 | 70 | 50 |
| 中油蟠7 Zhongyoupan 7 | 70 | 40 | 70 | 45 |
图7 桃‘东合1号’ב21世纪’杂交群体花芽受冻率与种植点方位相关性分析 A:由北到南到的种植点编号(1 ~ 150)与花芽受冻率的线性回归分析;B:东、中、西3行杂交群体每行的花芽受冻率平均值
Fig. 7 Correlation analysis of the flower bud freezing injury rates and the orientation of planting points of‘Donghe 1’ב21st Century’peach hybrids A:Linear regression analysis of the planting site numbers(1-150)from north to south and the flower bud freezing injury rates;B:The flower bud freezing injury rates of the eastern,central and western hybrid row
| 坐果等级 Fruit setting grade | 品种数 Cultivar number | 平均花芽受冻率/% The average flower bud freezing injury rates |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 21.4 ± 12.4 c |
| 1 | 35 | 48.9 ± 16.6 b |
| 2 | 77 | 49.9 ± 18.1 b |
| 3 | 38 | 71.0 ± 19.9 a |
| 4 | 4 | 81.2 ± 22.8 a |
| 总计Total | 164 |
表5 桃164个品种坐果等级与花芽受冻率综合分析
Table 5 The comprehensive analysis of the fruit setting grades and flower bud freezing injury rates in 164 peach cultivars
| 坐果等级 Fruit setting grade | 品种数 Cultivar number | 平均花芽受冻率/% The average flower bud freezing injury rates |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 21.4 ± 12.4 c |
| 1 | 35 | 48.9 ± 16.6 b |
| 2 | 77 | 49.9 ± 18.1 b |
| 3 | 38 | 71.0 ± 19.9 a |
| 4 | 4 | 81.2 ± 22.8 a |
| 总计Total | 164 |
| 库圃编号 The cultivar number | 抗倒春寒品种 The cultivars resistant to late spring coldness | 花芽受冻率/% Flower bud freezing injury rates | 库圃编号 The cultivar number | 不抗倒春寒品种 The cultivars not resistant to late spring coldness | 花芽受冻率/% Flower bud freezing injury rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0111 | 沪油018 Huyou 018 | 0 | T0246 | 中油金桂 Zhongyou Jingui | 100 |
| 无None | 秋悦 Qiuyue | 0 | T0255 | 中蟠102 Zhongpan 102 | 100 |
| T0135 | 瑞光美玉 Ruiguang Meiyu | 0 | T0268 | 锦冠 Jinguan | 100 |
| T0109 | 中农金辉 Zhongnong Jinhui | 0 | T0242 | 瑞蟠32 Ruipan 32 | 100 |
| T0160 | 秋燕 Qiuyan | 5 | T0253 | 中蟠21 Zhongpan 21 | 100 |
| T0115 | 霞晖6号 Xiahui 6 | 5 | T0254 | 中蟠101 Zhongpan 101 | 100 |
| 无None | 03-16-006 | 5 | T0224 | 瑞蟠20 Ruipan 20 | 95 |
| 无None | 秋诺 Qiunuo | 10 | T0260 | 郑11-36 Zheng 11-36 | 95 |
| T0116 | 霞晖8号 Xiahui 8 | 10 | 无None | 奶油蟠桃 Naiyou Pantao | 95 |
| 无None | 京清17号 Jingqing 17 | 10 | 无None | 040206 | 95 |
| 无None | 03-32-067 | 10 | T0240 | 瑞蟠101 Ruipan 101 | 95 |
表6 桃抗倒春寒与不抗倒春寒品种
Table 6 The peach cultivars resistant to late spring coldness and not resistant to late spring coldness
| 库圃编号 The cultivar number | 抗倒春寒品种 The cultivars resistant to late spring coldness | 花芽受冻率/% Flower bud freezing injury rates | 库圃编号 The cultivar number | 不抗倒春寒品种 The cultivars not resistant to late spring coldness | 花芽受冻率/% Flower bud freezing injury rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0111 | 沪油018 Huyou 018 | 0 | T0246 | 中油金桂 Zhongyou Jingui | 100 |
| 无None | 秋悦 Qiuyue | 0 | T0255 | 中蟠102 Zhongpan 102 | 100 |
| T0135 | 瑞光美玉 Ruiguang Meiyu | 0 | T0268 | 锦冠 Jinguan | 100 |
| T0109 | 中农金辉 Zhongnong Jinhui | 0 | T0242 | 瑞蟠32 Ruipan 32 | 100 |
| T0160 | 秋燕 Qiuyan | 5 | T0253 | 中蟠21 Zhongpan 21 | 100 |
| T0115 | 霞晖6号 Xiahui 6 | 5 | T0254 | 中蟠101 Zhongpan 101 | 100 |
| 无None | 03-16-006 | 5 | T0224 | 瑞蟠20 Ruipan 20 | 95 |
| 无None | 秋诺 Qiunuo | 10 | T0260 | 郑11-36 Zheng 11-36 | 95 |
| T0116 | 霞晖8号 Xiahui 8 | 10 | 无None | 奶油蟠桃 Naiyou Pantao | 95 |
| 无None | 京清17号 Jingqing 17 | 10 | 无None | 040206 | 95 |
| 无None | 03-32-067 | 10 | T0240 | 瑞蟠101 Ruipan 101 | 95 |
| [1] |
doi: 10.1111/pce.1989.12.issue-5 URL |
| [2] |
pmid: 23600239 |
| [3] |
|
|
陈杰忠. 2011. 果树栽培学各论. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
|
|
| [4] |
|
|
党宏忠, 冯金超, 董瑞香, 却晓娥, 王檬檬, 张金鑫. 2019. 晚霜冻害对黄土区苹果树水分利用能力的影响. 林业科学研究, 32 (4):137-143.
|
|
| [5] |
|
|
冯玉香, 何维勋. 1998. 梨花霜害程度与低温强度的关系. 园艺学报, 15 (1):24-27.
|
|
| [6] |
|
|
付全娟, 付成庆, 侯森, 魏国芹, 杨兴华, 孙玉刚. 2021. 春季低温对甜樱桃萌芽期冻害的影响. 落叶果树, 53 (3):27-29.
|
|
| [7] |
doi: 10.1111/ppl.2013.147.issue-1 URL |
| [8] |
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075033 URL |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI13518-18 URL |
| [11] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0514 |
|
刘瑞娥, 孙菀霞, 王丽, 农鸿霖, 仇明华, 于菲, 张琪静, 张才喜. 2025. 低纬度高海拔地区甜樱桃冻害阈值及缓解措施初探. 园艺学报, 52 (9):2453-2463.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0514 |
|
| [12] |
|
|
马翠云, 封雷, 陶书田, 张绍铃. 2014. 低温胁迫对梨花器官及授粉受精的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 37 (1):53-59.
|
|
| [13] |
|
|
马之胜, 贾云云, 马文会. 2003. 我国桃育种目标的演变、育种成就及目标展望. 河北农业科学,(S1):99-102.
|
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
doi: 10.17221/146/2016-HORTSCI URL |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2011.02.0098 URL |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
|
郗荣庭. 2009. 果树栽培学总论. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
|
|
| [22] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-1297 |
|
严娟, 赵滨涛, 孙朦, 宋宏峰, 蔡志翔, 李垍峣, 宿子文, 张明昊, 沈志军, 许建兰, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮. 2023. 基于桃需冷量探讨气温变化对其适应性的挑战. 园艺学报, 50 (4):724-736.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-1297 |
|
| [23] |
|
|
杨文刚, 黄永学, 刘可群, 范进进, 孟翠丽. 2018. 倒春寒气象指标及等级划分研究. 湖北农业科学, 57 (15):49-53.
|
|
| [24] |
|
|
张海英, 韩涛, 王有年, 李丽萍. 2006. 桃果实品质评价因子的选择. 农业工程学报,(8):235-239.
|
| [1] | 王莹莹, 王孝娣, 杨兴旺, 刘万春. 早熟桃新品种‘中农早春’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 31-32. |
| [2] | 陈昌文, 曹珂, 方伟超, 朱更瑞, 王新卫, 李勇, 吴金龙, 王力荣. 中熟黄肉桃新品种‘中桃金美’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 33-34. |
| [3] | 杨兴旺, 王海波, 王莹莹, 张望舒, 史祥宾, 刘万春, 王孝娣. 晚熟抗寒桃新品种‘中寒秋阳’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 35-36. |
| [4] | 时梦, 王海波, 刘立常, 刘志伍, 王莹莹, 杨兴旺, 王孝娣. 极晚熟桃新品种‘中农晚蜜’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 37-38. |
| [5] | 于坤淼, 李鹏, 王莹莹, 杨兴旺, 张艺灿, 刘畅, 刘万春, 王孝娣. 抗寒桃新品种‘中寒5号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 39-40. |
| [6] | 于坤淼, 李鹏, 王莹莹, 杨兴旺, 刘培培, 刘畅, 刘万春, 王孝娣. 抗寒桃新品种‘中寒6号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 41-42. |
| [7] | 王富荣, 艾小艳, 王会良, 刘勇, 朱炜, 张杨, 甘志猛, 顾霞, 刘模发, 诸小敏, 黎刚, 何华平, 龚林忠. 红肉油桃新品种‘楚红3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 43-44. |
| [8] | 许盼云, 徐叶挺, 王秀娟, 张洋军, 葛立鑫, 木巴热克·阿尤普. 扁桃新品种‘疆扁丰’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 45-46. |
| [9] | 韩飞, 李大卫, 张琼, 刘小莉, 田华, 钟彩虹. 特早花猕猴桃雄性新品种‘磨山雄7号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 57-58. |
| [10] | 李坤, 杨林, 杨玉皎, 许智萍, 陈大明, 刘元伟, 王先位, 张斌艳. 美味猕猴桃新品种‘邓猕1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 59-60. |
| [11] | 刘清华, 王策, 蒋迎春, 袁炎良, 陈奇. 黄肉猕猴桃新品种‘先沃七号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 61-62. |
| [12] | 罗轩, 杨晓斌, 高磊, 陈庆红, 汪志, 叶丽霞, 黄穷, 张蕾. 红肉软枣猕猴桃新品种‘金红豆’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 63-64. |
| [13] | 张建瑛, 田新华, 殷东生. 软枣猕猴桃新品种‘绿福3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 65-66. |
| [14] | 张庆朝, 冯博杰, 陶利婷, 徐晓薇, 陈瑞, 张立华. 猕猴桃新品种‘泰玉’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 67-68. |
| [15] | 黄闽敏, 宁万军, 张毅, 王宝庆, 马合木提·阿不来提, 阿迪来·买买提, 张强. 核桃新品种‘墨宝’[J]. 园艺学报, 2026, 53(S1): 69-70. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司