https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner1.jpg|#|苹果
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner2.jpg|#|甘蓝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner3.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner4.jpg|#|灵芝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner5.jpg|#|桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner6.jpg|#|黄瓜
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner7.jpg|#|蝴蝶兰
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner8.jpg|#|樱桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner9.jpg|#|观赏荷花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner10.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner11.jpg|#|月季
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner12.jpg|#|菊花

园艺学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 1409-1424.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0142

• 栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

低温胁迫对桃树苗期的影响及品种抗寒性评价

李杰, 田启航, 刘国俭, 田振东, 王雨, 王召元, 常瑞丰, 李永红*()   

  1. 河北省农林科学院昌黎果树研究所, 河北昌黎 066600
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-10 修回日期:2025-12-21 出版日期:2026-05-25 发布日期:2026-05-26
  • 通讯作者:
  • 基金资助:
    国家现代农业产业技术体系资助项目(CARS-30-Z-02); 河北省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资助(HBCT2024160205); 河北省科技创新人才队伍建设项目(C25R0601); 河北省农林科学院科技创新专项课题项目(2026KJCXZX-CGS-3)

Influence of Cold Stress and Cold Resistance Evaluation on the Seedling Stage of Peach Cultivars

LI Jie, TIAN Qihang, LIU Guojian, TIAN Zhendong, WANG Yu, WANG Zhaoyuan, CHANG Ruifeng, LI Yonghong*()   

  1. Changli Institute of PomologyHebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Changli, Hebei 066600, China
  • Received:2025-07-10 Revised:2025-12-21 Published:2026-05-25 Online:2026-05-26
  • Contact:

摘要:

通过人工气候室模拟低温环境,在0 ℃(对照)和-15 ℃、-20 ℃、-25 ℃、-30 ℃胁迫条件下,以21个桃品种的1年生桃苗茎部为试验材料,分析其相对电导率、组织褐变率、苯丙氨酸解氨酶(phenylalanine ammonia-lyase,PAL)活性、丙二醛(malondialdehyde,MDA)、游离脯氨酸(free proline,Pro)、可溶性糖(soluble sugar)含量的变化,运用隶属函数法和主成分分析法,对不同桃品种1年生苗期抗寒性进行综合分析评价及抗寒指标筛选。结果表明,低温处理下,21个桃品种苗期茎部的相对电导率、组织褐变率、PAL活性、MDA及游离Pro含量均不同程度升高,而可溶性糖含量则呈现先升高后降低的趋势;金黄金、21世纪、中华寿桃的相对电导率、PAL活性较对照增幅较大,寒公主、东合1号、珲春的游离Pro含量增幅较大。21个桃品种苗期的抗寒性由强到弱依次为:东合1号、珲春、寒公主、北京晚蜜、金宝、秋悦、秋燕、霞晖6号、秋怡、中油8号、春雪、中油21号、脆保、秀峰、大久保、中油蟠7号、燕特红、金黄金、金奥、21世纪和中华寿桃。根据隶属函数综合评价,抗寒性类型(等级)划分与半致死温度(LT50)和田间调查的结果一致。综上,木质部厚度、木质部比率、组织褐变率、相对电导率、PAL活性、MDA、游离Pro和可溶性糖含量可作为桃树苗期抗寒性评价的重要指标。

关键词: 桃, 苗期, 抗寒性, 综合评价, 指标筛选

Abstract:

The low-temperature environment was simulated in artificial climate chamber at 0 ℃,-15 ℃,-20 ℃,-25 ℃ and-30 ℃. The stems of 21 one-year old peach cultivars were selected. The differences in relative conductivity,tissue browning rate,activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase(PAL)and contents of malondialdehyde(MDA),free proline(Pro)and soluble sugar(SS)were analyzed. The cold resistance and physiological indexes of different peach cultivars were evaluated by the membership function method and principal component analysis. The results indicated that the relative conductivity,tissue browning rate,activity of PAL,contents of MDA and Pro in stems of 21 peach cultivars increased with the decrease of temperature,while SS content increased firstly and then decreased. Compared with the control,relative conductivity and activity of PAL in trunks of Jinhuangjin,21 Century and Zhonghua Shoutao increased greatly,contents of Pro in trunks of Hangongzhu,Donghe 1 and Hunchun increased greatly. The cold resistance of 21 cultivars were in the decreasing order of Donghe 1,Hunchun,Hangongzhu,Beijing Wanmi,Jinbao,Qiuyue,Qiuyan,Xiahui 6,Qiuyi,Cuibao,Zhongyou 8,Chunxue,Zhongyou 21,Xiufeng,Okubo,Yantehong,Jinhuangjin,Zhongyoupan 7,Jinao,21 Century,Zhonghua Shoutao. According to the comprehensive evaluation by membership function method,the classification of cold resistance type(grade)was consistent with the semi-lethal temperature(LT50)and the field survey results. The main indexes that affect the cold resistance of peach trees at the seedling stage are xylem thickness,xylem ratio,tissue browning rate,relative conductivity,activity of PAL and contents of MDA,free Pro and SS,and the differences(content)of these indexes can be used as important indexes to evaluate the cold resistance.

Key words: peach, seedling stage, cold resistance, comprehensive evaluation, parameters screening