Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 2987-3002.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0326
• Cultivation · Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Yu1, PAN Wencheng1, YANG Jiayu1, WEI Yaxiong1, ZHU Yanzhe1, HUANG Yanfa1, and WU Longguo1,2,*(
)
Received:2025-05-21
Revised:2025-08-27
Online:2025-11-26
Published:2025-11-26
Contact:
and WU Longguo
TIAN Yu, PAN Wencheng, YANG Jiayu, WEI Yaxiong, ZHU Yanzhe, HUANG Yanfa, and WU Longguo. Comprehensive Evaluation of Storage and Preservation Effects of Exogenous GABA Treatments on Cherry Tomato[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(11): 2987-3002.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0326
Fig. 1 Effect of exogenous GABA treatment on weight loss rate(A),decay index(B),hardness(C)of cherry tomatoes during storage Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level among different treatments at the same storage time(P < 0.05). The same below
Fig. 4 Effect of exogenous GABA treatment on soluble solids content(A),titratable acid content(B)and sugar-acid ratio(C)of cherry tomatoes during storage
| 项目 Item | 编号 Number | 指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 因子载荷 Factor loading | X1 | 腐烂指数 Decay index | 0.935 | 0.057 | 0.200 |
| X2 | 失重率 Weight loss rate | 0.946 | 0.109 | -0.132 | |
| X3 | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids | -0.968 | 0.007 | 0.063 | |
| X4 | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.665 | 0.448 | -0.418 | |
| X5 | 维生素C Vitamin C | 0.953 | 0.043 | -0.025 | |
| X6 | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | -0.953 | -0.123 | 0.007 | |
| X7 | PPO | 0.496 | -0.776 | 0.199 | |
| X8 | MDA | 0.970 | 0.143 | 0.050 | |
| X9 | SOD | 0.742 | 0.073 | -0.178 | |
| X10 | CAT | -0.767 | -0.005 | -0.556 | |
| X11 | PAL | 0.195 | 0.693 | 0.315 | |
| X12 | LOX | -0.506 | 0.457 | 0.595 | |
| X13 | 硬度 Hardness | 0.976 | -0.020 | 0.008 | |
| X14 | POD | -0.354 | 0.901 | -0.157 | |
| X15 | 可滴定酸 Titratable acidity | 0.951 | 0.017 | 0.044 | |
| 贡献率/% Contributive ratio | 63.79 | 15.75 | 7.33 | ||
| 累计贡献率/% Cumulative contributive ratio | 63.786 | 79.538 | 86.873 | ||
| 特征根 Eigenvector | 9.568 | 2.363 | 1.100 | ||
| 权重 Weight | 73.41% | 18.13% | 8.46% |
Table 1 Principal component contribution and eigenvectors
| 项目 Item | 编号 Number | 指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 因子载荷 Factor loading | X1 | 腐烂指数 Decay index | 0.935 | 0.057 | 0.200 |
| X2 | 失重率 Weight loss rate | 0.946 | 0.109 | -0.132 | |
| X3 | 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids | -0.968 | 0.007 | 0.063 | |
| X4 | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.665 | 0.448 | -0.418 | |
| X5 | 维生素C Vitamin C | 0.953 | 0.043 | -0.025 | |
| X6 | 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | -0.953 | -0.123 | 0.007 | |
| X7 | PPO | 0.496 | -0.776 | 0.199 | |
| X8 | MDA | 0.970 | 0.143 | 0.050 | |
| X9 | SOD | 0.742 | 0.073 | -0.178 | |
| X10 | CAT | -0.767 | -0.005 | -0.556 | |
| X11 | PAL | 0.195 | 0.693 | 0.315 | |
| X12 | LOX | -0.506 | 0.457 | 0.595 | |
| X13 | 硬度 Hardness | 0.976 | -0.020 | 0.008 | |
| X14 | POD | -0.354 | 0.901 | -0.157 | |
| X15 | 可滴定酸 Titratable acidity | 0.951 | 0.017 | 0.044 | |
| 贡献率/% Contributive ratio | 63.79 | 15.75 | 7.33 | ||
| 累计贡献率/% Cumulative contributive ratio | 63.786 | 79.538 | 86.873 | ||
| 特征根 Eigenvector | 9.568 | 2.363 | 1.100 | ||
| 权重 Weight | 73.41% | 18.13% | 8.46% |
Fig. 7 PCA analysis of the effect of exogenous GABA on storage and preservation of cherry tomato A:Scree plot;B:PCA loading plot,X1-X15 represent substances,as detailed in Table 1;C:PCA composite score plot
| 指标 Index | 熵值 Entropy value | 差异系数 Variance factor | 权重 Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| 硬度 Hardness | 0.962456775 | 0.037543225 | 0.039569076 |
| 失重率 Weight loss rate | 0.972257440 | 0.027742560 | 0.029239562 |
| 腐烂指数 Decay index | 0.956765164 | 0.043234836 | 0.045567809 |
| 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids | 0.917264360 | 0.082735640 | 0.087200095 |
| 可滴定酸 Titratable acidity | 0.971389714 | 0.028610286 | 0.030154111 |
| 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.972567590 | 0.027432410 | 0.028912676 |
| 维生素C Vitamin C | 0.966119133 | 0.033880867 | 0.035709095 |
| 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 0.891113483 | 0.108886517 | 0.114762087 |
| POD | 0.916665348 | 0.083334652 | 0.087831430 |
| PPO | 0.966103040 | 0.033896960 | 0.035726056 |
| MDA | 0.972749853 | 0.027250147 | 0.028720578 |
| SOD | 0.893916315 | 0.106083685 | 0.111808012 |
| CAT | 0.844553454 | 0.155446546 | 0.163834517 |
| PAL | 0.884562662 | 0.115437338 | 0.121666393 |
| LOX | 0.962713495 | 0.037286505 | 0.039298503 |
Table 2 Entropy method to analyze the effect of exogenous GABA treatment on the weights of indicators during storage of cherry tomatoes
| 指标 Index | 熵值 Entropy value | 差异系数 Variance factor | 权重 Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| 硬度 Hardness | 0.962456775 | 0.037543225 | 0.039569076 |
| 失重率 Weight loss rate | 0.972257440 | 0.027742560 | 0.029239562 |
| 腐烂指数 Decay index | 0.956765164 | 0.043234836 | 0.045567809 |
| 可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids | 0.917264360 | 0.082735640 | 0.087200095 |
| 可滴定酸 Titratable acidity | 0.971389714 | 0.028610286 | 0.030154111 |
| 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.972567590 | 0.027432410 | 0.028912676 |
| 维生素C Vitamin C | 0.966119133 | 0.033880867 | 0.035709095 |
| 糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio | 0.891113483 | 0.108886517 | 0.114762087 |
| POD | 0.916665348 | 0.083334652 | 0.087831430 |
| PPO | 0.966103040 | 0.033896960 | 0.035726056 |
| MDA | 0.972749853 | 0.027250147 | 0.028720578 |
| SOD | 0.893916315 | 0.106083685 | 0.111808012 |
| CAT | 0.844553454 | 0.155446546 | 0.163834517 |
| PAL | 0.884562662 | 0.115437338 | 0.121666393 |
| LOX | 0.962713495 | 0.037286505 | 0.039298503 |
| 处理 Treatment | D+ | D- | Ci | 排序 Sort | 处理 Treatment | D+ | D- | Ci | 排序 Sort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3(35 d) | 0.076 | 0.084 | 0.524 | 1 | 对照Control(28 d) | 0.090 | 0.054 | 0.377 | 16 |
| T2(35 d) | 0.075 | 0.078 | 0.508 | 2 | T4(21 d) | 0.088 | 0.051 | 0.370 | 17 |
| 对照Control(35 d) | 0.086 | 0.079 | 0.479 | 3 | T3(21 d) | 0.089 | 0.052 | 0.370 | 18 |
| T1(35 d) | 0.079 | 0.070 | 0.469 | 4 | T3(7 d) | 0.104 | 0.057 | 0.355 | 19 |
| T4(35 d) | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.466 | 5 | 对照Control(14 d) | 0.097 | 0.053 | 0.353 | 20 |
| T4(14 d) | 0.087 | 0.070 | 0.446 | 6 | T2(7 d) | 0.103 | 0.048 | 0.317 | 21 |
| T2(14 d) | 0.086 | 0.069 | 0.444 | 7 | 对照Control(21 d) | 0.096 | 0.045 | 0.317 | 22 |
| T2(28 d) | 0.077 | 0.060 | 0.438 | 8 | T4(7 d) | 0.106 | 0.045 | 0.299 | 23 |
| T3(28 d) | 0.080 | 0.062 | 0.435 | 9 | T1(7 d) | 0.108 | 0.040 | 0.271 | 24 |
| T1(14 d) | 0.091 | 0.064 | 0.413 | 10 | 对照Control(7 d) | 0.112 | 0.034 | 0.234 | 25 |
| T3(14 d) | 0.092 | 0.060 | 0.393 | 11 | 对照Control(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.215 | 26 |
| T4(28 d) | 0.084 | 0.053 | 0.386 | 12 | T1(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.214 | 27 |
| T2(21 d) | 0.085 | 0.053 | 0.384 | 13 | T2(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.214 | 28 |
| T1(28 d) | 0.086 | 0.054 | 0.383 | 14 | T3(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.214 | 29 |
| T1(21 d) | 0.088 | 0.053 | 0.378 | 15 | T4(0 d) | 0.120 | 0.032 | 0.213 | 30 |
Table 3 Cherry tomato entropy weight-TOPSIS composite evaluation score
| 处理 Treatment | D+ | D- | Ci | 排序 Sort | 处理 Treatment | D+ | D- | Ci | 排序 Sort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3(35 d) | 0.076 | 0.084 | 0.524 | 1 | 对照Control(28 d) | 0.090 | 0.054 | 0.377 | 16 |
| T2(35 d) | 0.075 | 0.078 | 0.508 | 2 | T4(21 d) | 0.088 | 0.051 | 0.370 | 17 |
| 对照Control(35 d) | 0.086 | 0.079 | 0.479 | 3 | T3(21 d) | 0.089 | 0.052 | 0.370 | 18 |
| T1(35 d) | 0.079 | 0.070 | 0.469 | 4 | T3(7 d) | 0.104 | 0.057 | 0.355 | 19 |
| T4(35 d) | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.466 | 5 | 对照Control(14 d) | 0.097 | 0.053 | 0.353 | 20 |
| T4(14 d) | 0.087 | 0.070 | 0.446 | 6 | T2(7 d) | 0.103 | 0.048 | 0.317 | 21 |
| T2(14 d) | 0.086 | 0.069 | 0.444 | 7 | 对照Control(21 d) | 0.096 | 0.045 | 0.317 | 22 |
| T2(28 d) | 0.077 | 0.060 | 0.438 | 8 | T4(7 d) | 0.106 | 0.045 | 0.299 | 23 |
| T3(28 d) | 0.080 | 0.062 | 0.435 | 9 | T1(7 d) | 0.108 | 0.040 | 0.271 | 24 |
| T1(14 d) | 0.091 | 0.064 | 0.413 | 10 | 对照Control(7 d) | 0.112 | 0.034 | 0.234 | 25 |
| T3(14 d) | 0.092 | 0.060 | 0.393 | 11 | 对照Control(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.215 | 26 |
| T4(28 d) | 0.084 | 0.053 | 0.386 | 12 | T1(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.214 | 27 |
| T2(21 d) | 0.085 | 0.053 | 0.384 | 13 | T2(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.214 | 28 |
| T1(28 d) | 0.086 | 0.054 | 0.383 | 14 | T3(0 d) | 0.119 | 0.032 | 0.214 | 29 |
| T1(21 d) | 0.088 | 0.053 | 0.378 | 15 | T4(0 d) | 0.120 | 0.032 | 0.213 | 30 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
|
陈蔚燕, 穆燕, 朱爱芳, 张保华. 2022. 玉米醇溶蛋白膜的制备及其保鲜效果评价. 现代食品科技, 38 (11):141-147.
|
|
| [5] |
|
|
陈秀, 罗震宇, 张亚男, 杨雪珍, 余志汇, 向妙莲, 陈金印, 陈明. 2022. 外源GABA处理对采后靖安椪柑果实品质和保鲜效果的影响. 果树学报, 39 (4):652-661.
|
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
|
甘婉莹, 邓孟胜, 张杰, 李昭玲, 童凯. 2023. γ-氨基丁酸对鲜切马铃薯贮藏品质的影响. 现代食品科技, 39 (10):178-184.
|
|
| [8] |
|
|
谷会, 杨月, 宋康华, 姚全胜, 杜丽清. 2024. 热空气处理对采后菠萝果肉褐变及生理特性的影响. 食品科技, 49 (9):33-41.
|
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
|
黄彭, 丁捷, 刘春燕, 李红莹, 李昕渝, 刘耀文, 秦文. 2024. 可食性复合涂膜对蓝莓的保鲜效果综合评价. 园艺学报, 51 (6):1361-1376.
|
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
|
李斗, 王宇航, 王春恒, 金鑫, 杨江山, 陈亚娟, 戴子博, 冯丽丹. 2024. GABA 对葡萄叶片光合色素及糖含量和果实风味的影响. 园艺学报, 51 (4):815-831.
|
|
| [15] |
|
|
李雅蔓, 朱玲瑶, 杨昳玥, 王矞璐, 刘沛媛, 兰雪娇, 冯湘凝, 艾靖岚, 廖玲. 2024. 外源GABA对“脆红李”果实采后品质及抗氧化活性的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 42 (5):1057-1061.
|
|
| [16] |
|
|
梁金甜, 曾丽萍, 赵文汇, 潘艳南, 熊雪淇, 王晓华. 2024. 主成分分析γ-氨基丁酸—壳聚糖涂膜对人参果贮藏品质的影响. 包装工程, 45 (1):165-173.
|
|
| [17] |
|
|
林彬. 2018. γ-氨基丁酸处理对采后冷敏橄榄果实抗冷性的影响及其机理研究[硕士论文]. 福州: 福建农林大学.
|
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
|
钱丽丽, 杨斯琪, 李跃, 刘盈, 李雪静, 孙华军. 2024. 果实采后软化机制研究进展. 食品工业科技, 45 (4):371-378.
|
|
| [21] |
|
|
任会会, 焦旋, 张立新. 2024. γ-氨基丁酸和1-甲基环丙烯复合熏蒸处理对甜柿贮藏品质的影响. 食品与发酵工业, 51 (16):106-114.
|
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
|
沈衡, 王琳, 李骞, 袁守娟, 郑伟, 王涛涛, 叶志彪, 杨长宪. 2024. 番茄风味和功能性成分研究进展. 园艺学报, 51 (2):423-438.
|
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
|
宋茜, 帅良, 沙金兰, 宋慕波, 刘雅欣, 刘云芬. 2025. 辣椒炭疽菌侵染对采后辣椒活性氧代谢的影响. 中国食品学报, 25 (1):281-292.
|
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
|
夏乐晗, 黄振宇, 陈龙, 崔泽轩, 陈玉玲. 2022. 杏果实成熟前后果肉硬度及软化相关酶活性的变化. 中国南方果树, 51 (5):130-134.
|
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
|
袁晓, 易景怡, 付龙威, 王光, 王斌. 2024. 真空包装结合低温贮藏对鲜切芋头的保鲜效果. 食品工业科技, 45 (11):280-288.
|
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
|
张雅. 2021. 甜橙果实品质综合评价分析系统的开发与验证[硕士论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学.
|
|
| [35] |
|
|
张玉蕾, 李雨璐, 王愈. 2024. 1-甲基环丙烯与茶多酚处理对樱桃番茄常温贮藏期间品质的影响. 食品科技, 49 (2):40-47.
|
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
|
周桐, 任心如, 黄秋婷, 陈瑜娴, 王艳华, 梨晓媚, 李静. 2024. 外源γ-氨基丁酸对龙眼果实采后品质的影响. 食品与发酵工业, 50 (2):93-99.
|
|
| [38] |
|
| [1] | SU Shiwen, FU Cunnian, CHEN Xianzhi, CUI Lili, SHI Jianlei, HUANG Shaoyong, XIONG Zili, ZAI Wenshan. A New Cherry Tomato Cultivar‘Ouxiu Hongying 5’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 133-134. |
| [2] | FU Cunnian, SU Shiwen, CHEN Xianzhi, CUI Lili, SHI Jianlei, HUANG Shaoyong, XIONG Zili, ZAI Wenshan. A New Cherry Tomato Cultivar‘Ouxiu Chengying 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S2): 135-136. |
| [3] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, WANG Youping, CHANG Peipei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Seed Germination of Watermelon Under Saline-Alkali Stress and Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(4): 1020-1036. |
| [4] | ZHI Hui, YANG Jingjing, LUO Jianrang. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis and Ornamental Comprehensive Evaluation of Ninety-six Tree Peony Cultivars Based on Landscape Application [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 635-645. |
| [5] | HUANG Peng, DING Jie, LIU Chunyan, LI Hongying, LI Xinyu, LIU Yaowen, QIN Wen. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Edible Coating on Postharvest Quality of Blueberry [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1361-1376. |
| [6] | HE Jie, DENG Junjun, GAO Min, ZHU Honghua, WANG Binglin, SUN Hongbo, YANG Yuan, YAN Han. A Novel Cherry Tomato Cultivar‘Fenbao 2’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2729-2730. |
| [7] | WANG Hongxiu, ZHOU Shangling, HE Shaoguo, TIAN Zaize, MA Jinghua, PENG Liangzhi, CHUN Changpin. Study on the Standard of Nutrient Elements Contents in Eureka Lemon Leaves [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1535-1546. |
| [8] | ZHENG Jinrong, NIE Jun, LI Yanhong, TAN Delong, XIE Yuming, ZHANG Changyuan. A Cherry Tomato Cultivar‘Yuekeda 101’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(4): 909-910. |
| [9] | DUAN Ruiwei, ZHANG Xiangzhan, LI Bo, WANG Mengru, XIE Yarong, LI Pei, WANG Lei, YANG Jian, XUE Huabai. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Spots in 296 Pear Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(11): 2305-2322. |
| [10] | YU Zheping, YAN Xiujuan, ZHANG Shuwen, ZHENG Xiliang, SUN Li, REN Haiying, LIANG Senmiao, QI Xingjiang. Preliminary Study on the Mechanism of Improvement of Resistance to Chinese Bayberry Twig Blight Disease by Brassinolide and Oligosaccharin [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(10): 2229-2241. |
| [11] | ZHENG Jirong and WANG Tonglin. A New Tomato Cultivar‘Hangza 601’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 105-106. |
| [12] | ZHENG Jirong and WANG Tonglin. A New Cherry Tomato Cultivar‘Hangza 503’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 107-108. |
| [13] | LI Yanhong, NIE Jun, ZHENG Jinrong, TAN Delong, ZHANG Changyuan, SHI Liangliang, XIE Yuming. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Multivariate Evaluation of Cherry Tomato by Phenotypic Traits in South China [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(9): 1717-1730. |
| [14] | LI Xianmei, CHEN Fadi, ZHANG Fei, CHEN Sumei, GUAN Zhiyong, FANG Weimin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Ornamental Traits and Selection of Pompon Type Cut Chrysanthemum [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(1): 107-116. |
| [15] | XUE Xin1,2,3,SHI Shengyou1,2,3,*,and HOU Shikui4. Comprehensive Evaluation and Diversity Analysis of Fruit Quality Traits in Longan‘Shuguan’בDawuyuan’Sexual Progenies [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2020, 47(5): 827-836. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd