Genetic Analysis of Fruit Traits in F1 Progenies of ‘Chinhuang’×‘Renong 1’Mango

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0148

Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 416-426.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0148

• Research Notes • Previous Articles Next Articles

Genetic Analysis of Fruit Traits in F₁ Progenies of ‘Chinhuang’×‘Renong 1’Mango

WU Hongxia, LI Xing, XU Wentian, ZHENG Bin, MA Xiaowei, SU Muqing, LIANG Qingzhi, YAO Quansheng(), WANG Songbiao()

Key Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Biology,Ministry of Agriculture,Key Laboratory of Hainan Province for Postharvest Physiology and Technology of Tropical Horticulture Product,South Subtropical Crops Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences,Zhanjiang,Guangdong 524091,China

Received:2021-05-17 Revised:2022-01-14 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-02-28
Contact: YAO Quansheng,WANG Songbiao E-mail:yqsh1028@163.com;wsbcjy@163.com

Abstract

Abstract:

Fifty-four individuals of F₁population from a cross‘Chinhuang’（female）×‘Renong 1’（male）were chosen as materials and 30 fruit traits were evaluated in mango. The genetic analysis were studied for nine quantitative traits including fruit weight,fruit length,width,thickness,fruit shape index, soluble solids,editable rate,stone length and stone weight. The Shannon-Weaver diversity index and principal component analysis of nine quantitative traits and 21 descriptive traits were carried out by SPSS19.0 software. The results showed that the phenotypic diversity of nine quantitative traits in the evaluated progenies were normal distribution or partial normal distribution,and its coefficient of variation ranged from 7.98% to 41.73%,the Shannon-Weaver diversity index（H’）of nine quantitative characters ranged from 1.65 to 2.04 indicating that the fruit of progenies was rich in diversity of quantitative characters,its heritability ranged from 84.74% to 117.00%,eight traits including fruit weight showed a trend of medium variation,while total soluble solids showed a trend of super parent inheritance. The diversity index of 21 descriptive characters ranged from 0.16 to 1.48. Principal component analysis showed that 75.19% of cumulative contribution rate was explained by the first 10 principal components,and fruit weight,resistance,fruit shape index,skin smoothness,length of fiber in pulp,veins on stone,fruit flavor,total soluble solids,type of embryony and pulp color were selected as the main traits. A comprehensive evaluation model for fruit traits of progenies was also established,based on this method,combined with field and practical observation results,eight outstanding individuals were selected.

Key words: mango, F₁ progeny, fruit trait, inheritance trend, segregation

CLC Number:

S677.7

WU Hongxia, LI Xing, XU Wentian, ZHENG Bin, MA Xiaowei, SU Muqing, LIANG Qingzhi, YAO Quansheng, WANG Songbiao. Genetic Analysis of Fruit Traits in F₁ Progenies of ‘Chinhuang’×‘Renong 1’Mango[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(2): 416-426.

Figures/Tables 6

References 23

[1]	Brettell R I S, Johnson P R, Kulkarni V J, Müller W, Bally I S E. 2004. Inheritance of fruit characters in hybrid mangoes produced through controlled pollination. Acta Horticulturae, 645:319-326.
[2]	Dong Xi, Li Shu-jun, Yang Hua, Guan Ling, Fu Zhong-jun, Qi Zhiyun, Jin Chuan, Yu Xueyuan, Yi Honghua, Chen Rongli, Zhang Pihui. 2019. Phenotypic diversity of maize landraces collected from Chongqing. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 20 (4):861-870. (in Chinese)
	董昕, 李淑君, 杨华, 官玲, 付忠军, 祁志云, 金川, 余雪源, 易红华, 陈荣丽, 张丕辉. 2019. 重庆玉米地方品种表型多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 20 (4):861-870.
[3]	Fanizza G, Lamaj F, Costantini L, Chaabane R, Grando M S. 2005. QTL analysis for fruit yield components in table grapes(Vitis vinifera). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 111(4):658-664. pmid: 15995866
[4]	Kuhn D N, Bally I S E, Dillon N L, Innes D, Groh A M, Rahaman J, Ophir R, Cohen Y, Sherman A. 2017. Genetic map of mango:a tool for mango breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8:577. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00577 URL
[5]	Li Y, Wang L R. 2020. Genetic resources,breeding programs in china,and gene mining of peach:a review. Horticultural Plant Journal, 6 (4):205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2020.06.001 URL
[6]	Liu Yin, Chen Tao, Zhang Jing, Wang Jue, Wang Hao, Tang Hao-ru, Wang Xiao-rong. 2016. Genetic diversity analysis of Chinese cherry landraces(Prunus pseudocerasus)based on phenotypic traits. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 43 (11):2119-2132. (in Chinese)
	刘胤, 陈涛, 张静, 王珏, 王浩, 汤浩茹, 王小蓉. 2016. 中国樱桃地方种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 园艺学报, 43 (11):2119-2132.
[7]	Lu Yu-sheng, Lin Zhi-xiong, Qiu Ji-shui, Chang Xiao-xiao, Pan Jian-ping. 2016. Fruit character diversity analysis and numerical taxonomy of wampee(Clausena lansium)germplasm resources. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 43 (10):1903-1915. (in Chinese)
	陆育生, 林志雄, 邱继水, 常晓晓, 潘建平. 2016. 黄皮种质资源果实性状多样性分析及其数量分类研究. 园艺学报, 43 (10):1903-1915.
[8]	Luo C, Shu B, Yao Q S, Wu H X, Xu W T, Wang S B. 2016. Construction of a high-density genetic map based on large-scale marker development in mango using specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing(SLAF-seq). Frontiers in Plant Science, 7:393.
[9]	Martinezgarcia P J, Parfitt D E, Ogundiwin E A, Fass J, Chan H M, Ahmad R, Lurie S, Dandekar A, Gradziel T M, Crisosto C H. 2013. High density SNP mapping and QTL analysis for fruit quality characteristics in peach(Prunus persica L.). Tree Genetics and Genomes, 9 (1):19-36. doi: 10.1007/s11295-012-0522-7 URL
[10]	Quilot B, Kervella J, M Génard, Lescourret F. 2005. Analysing the genetic control of peach fruit quality through an ecophysiological model combined with a QTL approach. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56 (422):3083-3092. pmid: 16234283
[11]	Rajan S, Yadava L P, Kumar R, Saxena S K. 2009. Genetic divergence in mango varieties and possible use in breeding. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 66 (1):7-12.
[12]	Rui Wenjing, Wang Xiaomin, Zhang Qiannan, Hu Xueyi, Hu Xinhua, Fu Jinjun, Gao Yanming, Li Jianshe. 2018. Genetic diversity analysis of 353 tomato germplasm resources by phenotypic traits. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 45 (3):561-570. (in Chinese)
	芮文婧, 王晓敏, 张倩男, 胡学义, 胡新华, 付金军, 高艳明, 李建设. 2018. 番茄353份种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 园艺学报, 45 (3):561-570.
[13]	Sharma D K, Majumdar P K. 1988. Further studies on inheritance in mango. Acta Horticulturae, 231:106-111.
[14]	Shi Sheng-you, Wu Hong-xia, Wang Song-biao, Yao Quan-sheng, Liu Li-qin, Wang Yi-cheng, Ma Wei-hong, Zhan Ru-lin. 2011. Fruit quality diversity of mango(Mangifera indica L.)germplasm. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 38 (5):840-848. (in Chinese)
	石胜友, 武红霞, 王松标, 姚全胜, 刘丽琴, 王一承, 马蔚红, 詹儒林. 2011. 杧果种质果实品质性状多样性分析. 园艺学报, 38 (5):840-848.
[15]	Sridhar D, Ghosh B, Kundu S, Hasan M A, Das N C. 2018. Genetic variability and heritability studies of mango cultivars. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7 (9):752-756. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas URL
[16]	Sun R, Chang Y, Yang F, Wang Y, Li H, Zhao Y, Chen D, Wu T, Zhang X, Han Z. 2015. A dense SNP genetic map constructed using restriction site-associated DNA sequencing enables detection of QTLs controlling apple fruit quality. BMC Genomics, 16 (1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1946-x URL
[17]	Wang P, Luo Y F, Huang J F, Gao S H, Zhu G P, Dang Z G, Gai J T, Yang M, Zhu M, Zhang H K, Ye X X, GaoA P, Tan X Y, Wang S, Wu S Y, Cahoon E B, Bai B B, Zhao Z C, Li Q, Wei J Y, Chen H R, Luo R X, Gong D Y, Tang K X, Zhang B, Ni Z G, Huang G D, Hu S N, Chen Y Y. 2020. The genome evolution and domestication of tropical fruit mango. Genome Biology, 21:60. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-01959-8 URL
[18]	Wu J, Li L T, Li M, Khan A, Li X G, Chen H, Yin H, Zhang S L. 2014. High-density genetic linkage map construction and identification of fruit-related QTLs in pear using SNP and SSR markers. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65 (20):5771-5781. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru311 URL
[19]	Xue Xin, Shi Shengyou, Hou Shikui. 2020. Comprehensive evaluation and diversity analysis of fruit quality traits in longan‘Shuguan’×‘Da Wuyuan’sexual progenies. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (5):827-836. (in Chinese)
	薛鑫, 石胜友, 侯世奎. 2020. 龙眼‘蜀冠’×‘大乌圆’杂交后代果实品质性状多样性分析及综合评价. 园艺学报, 47 (5):827-836.
[20]	Yang C Q, Sha G Y, Wei T, Ma B Q, Li C Y, Li P M, Zou Y J, Xu L F, Ma F W. 2021. Linkage map and QTL mapping of red flesh locus in apple using a R1R1 × R6R6 population. Horticultural Plant Journal, 7 (5):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2020.12.008 URL
[21]	Yao Quan-sheng, Lei Xin-tao, Huang Zhong-xing, Zhu Min, Wang Song-biao, Huang Li-fang, Ma Xiao-wei, Zhan Ru-lin, Wu Hong-xia. 2010. Construction of the resistanse to anthracnose for crossed mango population and identification by SSR molecular markers. Journal of Fruit Science, 27 (2):265-269. (in Chinese)
	姚全胜, 雷新涛, 黄忠兴, 朱敏, 王松标, 黄丽芳, 马小卫, 詹儒林, 武红霞. 2010. 杧果炭疽病抗性杂交群体的构建及SSR分子标记鉴定. 果树学报, 27 (2):265-269.
[22]	Zhang G, Sebolt A M, Sooriyapathirana S S, Wang D, Bink M C, Olmstead J W, Iezzoni A F. 2010. Fruit size QTL analysis of an F₁ population derived from a cross between a domesticated sweet cherry cultivar and a wild forest sweet cherry. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 6 (1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s11295-009-0225-x URL
[23]	Zeng Shaomin, Chen Xiaoming, Huang Xinzhong. 2019. Fruit character diversity analysis and numerical classification of local pear germplasm resources in Fujian. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 46 (2):237-251. (in Chinese)
	曾少敏, 陈小明, 黄新忠. 2019. 福建地方梨资源果实性状多样性分析及其数量分类研究. 园艺学报, 46 (2):237-251.

性状 Character	♀	♂	F₁							超高亲/% SPR	超低亲/ % LPR
性状 Character	♀	♂	亲中值 MP	均值 FA	标准差 SD	CV/ %	遗传力/% T_a	优势率/% H_a	多样性指数H’	超高亲/% SPR	超低亲/ % LPR
单果质量/g Fruit weight	915	453	684	590.90	197.43	33.41	86.39	-13.61	1.98	7.41	27.78
果实纵径/cm Fruit length	19.90	10.80	15.35	13.01	1.49	11.44	84.74	-15.26	2.01	0	3.70
果实横径/cm Fruit width	10.10	9.90	10	9.39	1.17	12.49	93.94	-6.06	2.00	25.93	70.37
果实侧径/cm Fruit thickness	8.90	9.50	9.2	8.62	1.04	12.02	93.66	-6.34	2.04	22.22	57.41
果形指数 Fruit shape index	1.97	1.09	1.53	1.34	0.15	11.24	87.70	-12.30	1.95	0	0
可溶性固形物/ ºBrix Soluble solids	15.60	12.90	14.25	16.67	2.39	14.31	117.00	17.00	1.93	61.11	1.85
可食率/% Editable rate	73.50	74.60	74.05	73.28	5.85	7.98	98.96	-1.04	1.83	42.59	46.3
果核长度/cm Stone length	15.76	7.76	11.76	10.37	1.47	14.18	88.20	-11.80	1.82	0	0
果核质量/g Stone weight	73.00	36.50	54.75	52.77	22.02	41.73	96.38	-3.62	1.65	18.52	24.07

性状 Character	♀	♂	F₁							超高亲/% SPR	超低亲/ % LPR
性状 Character	♀	♂	亲中值 MP	均值 FA	标准差 SD	CV/ %	遗传力/% T_a	优势率/% H_a	多样性指数H’	超高亲/% SPR	超低亲/ % LPR
单果质量/g Fruit weight	915	453	684	590.90	197.43	33.41	86.39	-13.61	1.98	7.41	27.78
果实纵径/cm Fruit length	19.90	10.80	15.35	13.01	1.49	11.44	84.74	-15.26	2.01	0	3.70
果实横径/cm Fruit width	10.10	9.90	10	9.39	1.17	12.49	93.94	-6.06	2.00	25.93	70.37
果实侧径/cm Fruit thickness	8.90	9.50	9.2	8.62	1.04	12.02	93.66	-6.34	2.04	22.22	57.41
果形指数 Fruit shape index	1.97	1.09	1.53	1.34	0.15	11.24	87.70	-12.30	1.95	0	0
可溶性固形物/ ºBrix Soluble solids	15.60	12.90	14.25	16.67	2.39	14.31	117.00	17.00	1.93	61.11	1.85
可食率/% Editable rate	73.50	74.60	74.05	73.28	5.85	7.98	98.96	-1.04	1.83	42.59	46.3
果核长度/cm Stone length	15.76	7.76	11.76	10.37	1.47	14.18	88.20	-11.80	1.82	0	0
果核质量/g Stone weight	73.00	36.50	54.75	52.77	22.02	41.73	96.38	-3.62	1.65	18.52	24.07

性状 Character	分级标准与等级分布（%）Grading standards and distribution					多样性指数H’
性状 Character	1	2	3	4	5	多样性指数H’
果实形状 Shape of fruit	椭圆（11.11） Ellipsoid	圆球（7.41） Round	卵形（31.48） Ovoid	卵圆形（29.63） Ovoid round	长卵形（20.37） Long ovoid	1.48
果喙 Fruit bake	无（59.26） Perceptible	点（35.19） Pointed	突出（5.56） Prominent			1.07
果窝 Fruit sinus	无（50.00） Absent	浅（44.44） Shallow	中等（5.56） Medium deep			0.87
青熟果果皮颜色 Skin colour of mature fruit	绿色（68.52） Green	绿带红晕（31.48） Green with red blush				0.62
完熟果果皮颜色 Skin colour of ripe fruit	绿黄（5.56） Greenish yellow	黄色（44.44） Yellow	橙黄（5.56） Orange yellow	黄带红晕（38.89）Yellow with red blush	红色（5.56） Red	1.21
果皮光滑度	光滑（81.48）	粗糙（18.52）				0.48
Skin smoothness	Smooth	Rough
果粉	少（16.67）	中等（1.85）	多（81.48）			0.54
Fruit powder	Less	Medium	More
果洼	无（25.93）	浅（57.41）	中等（14.81）	深（1.85）		1.03
Fruit stalk cavity	Absent	Shallow	Medium	Deep
果颈	无（75.93）	微突（22.22）	中等（1.85）			0.62
Fruit neck	Absent	Slightly prominent	Prominent
果皮与果肉的黏着度	不黏（33.33）	中等（40.74）	黏（25.93）			1.08
Adherence of fruit skin to pulp	Weak	Intermediate	Strong
果肉颜色	乳黄（3.70）	浅黄（18.52）	黄（35.19）	橙黄（40.74）	橙红（1.85）	1.24
Pulp colour	Creamy yellow	Light yellow	Yellow	Orange yellow	Orange red
果肉纤维数量	少（40.74）	中等（50.00）	多（9.26）			0.93
Quantity of fiber in pulp	Low	Medium	High
果肉纤维长度	短（38.89）	中等（61.11）				0.67
Length of fiber in pulp	Short	Medium
果肩	斜平（29.63）	平（62.96）	突出（7.41）			0.84
Slope of fruit ventral shoulder	Sloping abruptly	Sloping gradually in a long curve	Rising and then rounded
果顶	尖（38.89）	钝（51.85）	圆（9.26）			0.93
Fruit apex	Acute	Obtuse	Round
种仁形状	椭圆（38.89）	长椭圆（24.07）	肾形（31.48）	其他（5.56）		1.42
Seed shape	Ellipsoid	Oblong	Reniform	Other
果核表面特征	平滑（59.26）	凹陷（40.74）				0.68
Veins on stone	Level with surface	Depressed
果核脉络形状	平行（27.78）	交叉（72.22）				0.59
Stone venation	Parallel	Forked
胚类型	单胚（96.30）	多胚（3.70）				0.16
Type of embryony	Monoembryony	Polyembryony
果实风味	清甜（22.22）	甜（51.85）	浓甜（3.70）	酸甜（14.82）	酸（7.41）	1.27
Fruit flavor	Light sweet	Sweet	Strong sweet	Sweet and sour	Sour
抗性	高感（20.37）	感（5.56）	中抗（51.85）	抗（5.56）	高抗（16.67）	1.28
Resistance	High sensitive	Sensitive	Medium resistance	Resistance	High resistance

性状 Character	分级标准与等级分布（%）Grading standards and distribution					多样性指数H’
性状 Character	1	2	3	4	5	多样性指数H’
果实形状 Shape of fruit	椭圆（11.11） Ellipsoid	圆球（7.41） Round	卵形（31.48） Ovoid	卵圆形（29.63） Ovoid round	长卵形（20.37） Long ovoid	1.48
果喙 Fruit bake	无（59.26） Perceptible	点（35.19） Pointed	突出（5.56） Prominent			1.07
果窝 Fruit sinus	无（50.00） Absent	浅（44.44） Shallow	中等（5.56） Medium deep			0.87
青熟果果皮颜色 Skin colour of mature fruit	绿色（68.52） Green	绿带红晕（31.48） Green with red blush				0.62
完熟果果皮颜色 Skin colour of ripe fruit	绿黄（5.56） Greenish yellow	黄色（44.44） Yellow	橙黄（5.56） Orange yellow	黄带红晕（38.89）Yellow with red blush	红色（5.56） Red	1.21
果皮光滑度	光滑（81.48）	粗糙（18.52）				0.48
Skin smoothness	Smooth	Rough
果粉	少（16.67）	中等（1.85）	多（81.48）			0.54
Fruit powder	Less	Medium	More
果洼	无（25.93）	浅（57.41）	中等（14.81）	深（1.85）		1.03
Fruit stalk cavity	Absent	Shallow	Medium	Deep
果颈	无（75.93）	微突（22.22）	中等（1.85）			0.62
Fruit neck	Absent	Slightly prominent	Prominent
果皮与果肉的黏着度	不黏（33.33）	中等（40.74）	黏（25.93）			1.08
Adherence of fruit skin to pulp	Weak	Intermediate	Strong
果肉颜色	乳黄（3.70）	浅黄（18.52）	黄（35.19）	橙黄（40.74）	橙红（1.85）	1.24
Pulp colour	Creamy yellow	Light yellow	Yellow	Orange yellow	Orange red
果肉纤维数量	少（40.74）	中等（50.00）	多（9.26）			0.93
Quantity of fiber in pulp	Low	Medium	High
果肉纤维长度	短（38.89）	中等（61.11）				0.67
Length of fiber in pulp	Short	Medium
果肩	斜平（29.63）	平（62.96）	突出（7.41）			0.84
Slope of fruit ventral shoulder	Sloping abruptly	Sloping gradually in a long curve	Rising and then rounded
果顶	尖（38.89）	钝（51.85）	圆（9.26）			0.93
Fruit apex	Acute	Obtuse	Round
种仁形状	椭圆（38.89）	长椭圆（24.07）	肾形（31.48）	其他（5.56）		1.42
Seed shape	Ellipsoid	Oblong	Reniform	Other
果核表面特征	平滑（59.26）	凹陷（40.74）				0.68
Veins on stone	Level with surface	Depressed
果核脉络形状	平行（27.78）	交叉（72.22）				0.59
Stone venation	Parallel	Forked
胚类型	单胚（96.30）	多胚（3.70）				0.16
Type of embryony	Monoembryony	Polyembryony
果实风味	清甜（22.22）	甜（51.85）	浓甜（3.70）	酸甜（14.82）	酸（7.41）	1.27
Fruit flavor	Light sweet	Sweet	Strong sweet	Sweet and sour	Sour
抗性	高感（20.37）	感（5.56）	中抗（51.85）	抗（5.56）	高抗（16.67）	1.28
Resistance	High sensitive	Sensitive	Medium resistance	Resistance	High resistance

性状 Character	主成分特征系数 Eigenvector of principal component
性状 Character	PC1	PC2	PC3	PC4	PC5	PC6	PC7	PC8	PC9	PC10
单果质量Fruit weight	0.90	0.11	0.07	0.04	-0.24	-0.01	0.05	0.04	0.11	0.08
果实纵径 Fruit length	0.70	0.28	-0.44	0.13	-0.27	0.04	0.06	-0.07	-0.02	0.21
果实横径 Fruit width	0.89	-0.03	0.28	0.19	-0.16	0	-0.05	0.08	0.06	0.08
果实侧径 Fruit thickness	0.92	-0.04	0.21	0.16	-0.10	0.06	0.02	0.05	0.05	0.00
果形指数 Fruit shape index	-0.26	0.34	-0.78	-0.07	-0.10	0.01	0.08	-0.16	-0.10	0.11
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids	-0.30	-0.15	-0.11	0.08	-0.28	0.24	-0.05	0.51	0.02	-0.40
可食率 Editable rate	0.33	-0.34	-0.15	-0.19	0.01	-0.47	0.06	0.37	0.12	0.17
果核长度 Stone length	0.58	0.41	-0.47	0.17	-0.11	0.02	-0.20	-0.16	0.10	-0.02
果核质量 Stone weight	0.29	0.52	-0.04	0.35	-0.19	0	-0.31	-0.06	0.09	-0.40
果实形状 Shape of fruit	-0.10	0.03	-0.15	-0.47	-0.40	0.12	-0.41	0.25	-0.13	0.16
果喙 Fruit bake	0.14	0.32	0.07	-0.14	0.07	-0.39	-0.08	0.44	-0.42	-0.07
果窝 Fruit sinus	0.11	0.39	-0.03	-0.43	0.23	-0.16	-0.08	-0.17	0.28	-0.31
青熟果果皮颜色 Skin colour of mature fruit	-0.42	0.42	0.50	0.17	-0.29	0.14	-0.05	-0.09	-0.31	0.09
完熟果果皮颜色 Skin colour of ripe fruit	-0.29	0.54	0.43	0.19	-0.36	0.01	-0.17	0.10	-0.05	0.20
果粉 Fruit powder	0.04	0.31	0.09	-0.53	-0.12	-0.01	0.38	0.14	0.18	-0.18
果皮光滑度 Skin smoothness	-0.05	-0.43	-0.08	0.57	0.09	-0.23	-0.14	0.12	-0.14	0.20
果洼 Fruit stalk cavity	0.53	-0.06	0.21	-0.28	0.27	0.30	-0.13	-0.01	-0.35	-0.14
果颈 Fruit neck	-0.36	0.27	-0.28	0.45	-0.25	-0.28	0.24	0.26	0.20	0.01
果皮与果肉的黏着度 Adherence of fruit skin to pulp	0.13	-0.13	0.05	0.29	0.04	0.46	0.38	0.45	-0.07	-0.17
果肉颜色 Pulp colour	-0.26	0.04	0.24	0.11	-0.27	0.44	0.15	0.11	0.29	0.40
果肉纤维数量 Quantity of fiber in pulp	-0.07	0.63	-0.01	0.35	0.49	0.14	-0.27	0.17	-0.04	-0.04
果肉纤维长度 Length of fiber in pulp	-0.09	0.54	-0.12	0.32	0.56	0.11	0.01	0.23	0.01	0.03
果肩 Slope of fruit ventral shoulder	0.13	0.16	0.45	-0.39	0.21	-0.18	-0.25	0.31	-0.09	0.23
果顶 Fruit apex	0.18	-0.30	0.61	0.27	0.01	0.10	-0.06	-0.17	0.16	-0.19
种仁形状 Seed shape	0.20	0.04	-0.22	-0.05	0.42	0.19	-0.17	0.32	0.30	0.28
果核表面特征 Veins on stone	0.12	0.23	0.26	0.26	-0.06	-0.54	0.51	0.09	-0.16	-0.11
果核脉络形状 Stone venation	0.01	-0.30	0.04	0.37	0.42	-0.11	0.04	-0.28	-0.10	0.12
胚类型 Type of embryony	-0.23	0.16	0.38	-0.07	0.18	-0.16	-0.02	0.11	0.57	0.02
果实风味 Fruit flavor	0.27	0.14	-0.16	-0.21	0.25	0.35	0.59	0.07	-0.18	0.09
抗性 Resistance	0	0.65	0.34	-0.16	0.06	-0.03	0.28	-0.31	-0.04	0.23
特征值 Eigenvalue	4.66	3.30	2.85	2.48	2.02	1.68	1.62	1.57	1.25	1.13
贡献率 Contribution rate	15.53	10.98	9.50	8.28	6.72	5.60	5.41	5.24	4.17	3.77
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate	15.53	26.51	36.01	44.29	51.00	56.60	62.01	67.25	71.42	75.19

Genetic Analysis of Fruit Traits in F₁ Progenies of ‘Chinhuang’×‘Renong 1’Mango

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

JR	主成分得分Principal components score										总得分 Score	排名 Rank
JR	F1	F2	F3	F4	F5	F6	F7	F8	F9	F10	总得分 Score	排名 Rank
JR-1	1.17	0.78	1.86	0.69	-0.74	-0.31	-0.49	1.01	-1.82	-0.65	0.48	7
JR-2	-0.34	-0.43	-0.32	-0.71	1.54	0.00	-0.92	0.52	-0.15	-1.11	-0.21	37
JR-3	0.30	0.18	-0.57	-0.66	0.53	0.39	-1.02	0.52	0.34	0.74	0.04	27
JR-4	0.33	-1.51	-0.11	0.62	1.33	0.47	-0.46	1.94	-0.64	0.32	0.14	18
JR-5	0.17	-0.28	1.61	-0.66	-1.23	-1.33	-0.09	-0.22	-0.39	0.41	-0.11	32
JR-6	0.15	-0.88	-0.97	-1.69	-0.48	-0.14	0.17	0.36	-1.52	0.48	-0.48	49
JR-7	0.28	-0.63	0.01	0.63	0.44	-0.24	0.27	0.22	0.12	-0.29	0.09	24
JR-8	-1.24	-0.05	-0.15	-1.31	1.28	-0.42	-0.68	-0.89	-0.78	-0.30	-0.51	50
JR-9	-0.94	0.05	0.72	0.42	1.13	1.44	-0.58	0.86	0.12	0.78	0.22	13
JR-10	0.82	-0.45	0.05	-1.01	0.31	-0.24	1.59	0.59	-0.97	-0.59	0.08	25
JR-13	-0.04	-0.41	-1.73	1.26	0.53	1.29	-0.43	0.65	-0.11	-0.54	-0.02	28
JR-13-2	-0.79	-0.46	0.97	-0.59	-1.58	1.91	0.27	0.66	0.02	0.41	-0.08	30
JR-15	-0.21	-2.35	0.46	0.35	0.17	-0.38	1.42	1.22	-0.47	-1.51	-0.22	38
JR-16	0	-0.79	-0.04	1.66	-0.41	-1.35	1.19	-0.95	0.52	-0.75	-0.06	29
JR-17	-1.03	0.76	1.38	-0.05	1.21	-0.88	1.33	0.24	-1.84	-0.91	0.07	26
JR-18	1.83	1.20	-0.59	-1.07	0.64	1.26	0.79	0.52	-0.83	0.87	0.60	3
JR-20	-0.61	1.76	0.25	-0.88	2.11	0.81	-0.61	-1.70	-0.85	-0.32	0.09	22
JR-21	-0.45	-1.17	-0.24	-1.08	-0.30	0.24	-0.11	-0.14	-0.06	0.19	-0.43	48
JR-22	-1.01	0.05	1.10	-0.03	-1.94	-0.81	0.53	1.03	-0.59	-1.19	-0.28	43
JR-23	0.56	-0.49	-1.54	-1.34	-0.88	-0.05	-0.56	0.52	0.12	-0.75	-0.42	47
JR-24	-1.74	0.98	2.40	-1.24	0.97	0.70	-0.66	0.44	2.21	0.18	0.21	15
JR-25	0.12	0.07	-0.61	-0.11	-0.21	1.54	0.11	2.23	0.15	-0.37	0.20	17
JR-26	-0.43	-0.18	0.80	-1.12	-2.05	1.55	0.01	-0.06	-0.32	0.05	-0.23	39
JR-27	1.62	0.26	0.59	0.43	0.29	-0.58	-0.49	-0.44	0.17	-2.13	0.31	11
JR-31	-0.79	0.67	-0.85	-0.14	1.11	-1.74	0.76	0.10	-0.49	-1.18	-0.24	40
JR-32	-0.50	0.37	-0.83	-0.38	0.26	0.10	0.10	1.46	2.08	0.87	0.10	21
JR-33	-1.29	0.53	1.22	0.14	1.31	0.86	1.99	-1.24	-1.04	1.08	0.22	14
JR-34	-0.56	0.69	1.45	0.56	0.87	-2.29	0.48	0.63	3.57	0.05	0.42	9
JR-35	0.83	0.38	1.40	-0.13	-0.98	-0.40	0.20	-1.55	0.12	2.29	0.30	12
JR-36	0.45	0.66	-1.08	-0.98	-0.95	-0.50	-1.57	-0.81	0.49	1.26	-0.25	41
JR-37	2.45	0.17	0.51	0.43	0.81	0.55	-0.83	0.40	0.05	-0.36	0.71	1
JR-38	-0.61	2.69	-0.71	-0.16	-0.82	-1.89	-0.69	1.32	-1.12	-0.20	-0.09	31
JR-39	1.28	1.47	0.52	-0.67	0.30	0.53	0.37	1.32	-1.14	0.74	0.63	2
JR-41	-1.64	0.48	-1.07	2.85	-0.71	-0.59	0.52	0.59	-1.28	0.34	-0.17	34
JR-42	0.19	0.04	-0.20	0.62	0.42	0.91	0.44	-1.09	1.04	-1.68	0.12	19
JR-44	-0.57	0.16	-0.32	-1.21	-0.24	-0.52	0.44	-0.54	0.15	-0.22	-0.34	46
JR-45	-0.33	-0.52	-1.93	-0.15	-1.23	0.11	-0.28	-1.71	0.37	-1.69	-0.71	54
JR-46	-1.59	1.34	-0.87	0.79	-1.55	0.25	0.68	-0.37	-0.11	-0.50	-0.28	44
JR-47	1.29	0.18	-0.93	0.54	-0.84	-0.24	3.70	-0.07	0.50	2.29	0.55	5
JR-49	1.24	0.60	-1.51	0.17	1.49	-0.43	1.43	-1.32	0.74	0.26	0.34	10
JR-50	-0.96	-1.12	0.89	0.20	-0.93	0.09	-1.10	-1.44	-0.81	0.10	-0.52	52
JR-51	0.59	-1.24	0.40	-0.17	-0.10	1.74	1.25	-0.66	0.68	0.61	0.21	16
JR-52	0.72	0.20	-0.33	-1.35	-1.54	-0.59	-1.09	-0.67	0.25	-0.32	-0.32	45
JR-53	-0.09	0.06	-1.03	0.80	0.66	2.06	-0.33	-0.38	0.55	-1.08	0.09	23
JR-54	-0.20	0.19	0.51	1.81	0.06	0.43	-1.93	-0.80	-0.84	1.46	0.12	20
JR-55	-0.01	-1.93	-0.46	0.23	0.56	-1.12	-1.34	-0.73	-1.04	0.37	-0.54	53
JR-55-2	0.28	2.53	-0.05	2.09	-1.50	1.74	-0.49	-1.03	0.88	-1.07	0.53	6
JR-56	-0.23	-1.86	1.51	0.34	0.23	0.21	-0.30	-1.38	0.26	0.17	-0.15	33
JR-57	-1.95	0.04	-1.39	-0.94	0.48	-0.54	-0.32	1.16	1.21	0.72	-0.51	51
JR-58	2.77	0.42	0.85	-0.31	-0.25	-1.37	-0.91	0.46	1.02	-0.72	0.57	4
JR-60	0.97	-0.91	0.64	2.25	0.72	-0.28	-0.97	0.43	0.15	0.44	0.43	8
JR-61	-0.45	-1.44	-0.24	0.69	-1.23	-0.34	-0.49	1.43	1.31	1.11	-0.20	36
JR-62	-0.07	-0.11	-1.32	0.77	0.81	-1.41	-1.13	-0.84	-0.75	2.66	-0.19	35
JR-63	0.28	-0.76	-0.14	-1.21	0.11	-0.19	0.84	-1.80	0.74	-0.78	-0.27	42

♀,♂ & JR	综合得分Score	单果质量/g FW	果形指数 FSI	可溶性固形物/ ºBrix TSS	果皮光滑度SS	果肉颜色 PC	果肉纤维长度LFP	果核表面特征VS	胚类型 ET	风味 FF	抗性 Resistance
♀		915	1.97	15.60	光滑 Smooth	黄 Yellow	中等 Medium	平滑 Level with surface	多胚 Polyembryony	甜 Sweet	中抗 Medium resistance
♂		453	1.09	12.90	光滑 Smooth	橙红 Orange red	短 Short	平滑 Level with surface	单胚 Monoembryony	清甜 Light sweet	高抗 High resistance
JR-1	0.48	850	1.20	17.87	光滑 Smooth	黄 Yellow	中等 Medium	凹陷 Depressed	单胚 Monoembryony	甜 Sweet	中抗 Medium resistance
JR-24	0.21	290	1.20	16.80	光滑 Smooth	橙黄 Orange yellow	中等 Medium	平滑 Level with surface	多胚 Polyembryony	甜 Sweet	高抗 High resistance
JR-27	0.31	830	1.20	16.77	光滑 Smooth	浅黄 Light yellow	中等 Medium	凹陷 Depressed	单胚 Monoembryony	清甜 Light sweet	中抗 Medium resistance
JR-33	0.22	343.75	1.37	14.40	光滑 Smooth	橙黄 Orange yellow	中等 Medium	凹陷 Depressed	单胚 Monoembryony	酸甜Sweet and sour	高抗 High resistance
JR-34	0.42	575.95	1.25	15.83	光滑 Smooth	橙黄 Orange yellow	中等 Medium	凹陷 Depressed	多胚 Polyembryony	清甜 Light sweet	中抗 Medium resistance
JR-37	0.71	964.29	1.16	15.40	光滑 Smooth	黄 Yellow	中等 Medium	平滑 Level with surface	单胚 Monoembryony	甜 Sweet	中抗 Medium resistance
JR-39	0.63	687.50	1.27	16.37	光滑 Smooth	黄 Yellow	中等 Medium	凹陷 Depressed	单胚 Monoembryony	酸 Sour	高抗 High resistance
JR-55-2	0.53	790	1.42	17.53	光滑 Smooth	橙黄 Orange yellow	中等 Medium	平滑 Level with surface	单胚 Monoembryony	甜 Sweet	高抗 High resistance

[1]	ZHAO Zhichang, HUANG Jianfeng, LUO Ruixiong, GAO Aiping, CHEN Yeyuan, WANG Guangying, CHEN Jingfeng, GONG Deyong, and DANG Zhiguo, . A New Mango Cultivar‘Hongyu’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 55-56.
[2]	ZHAO Zhichang, HUANG Jianfeng, LUO Ruixiong, GAO Aiping, CHEN Yeyuan, WANG Guangying, CHEN Jingfeng, GONG Deyong, and DANG Zhiguo, . A New Mango Cultivar‘Fenghuang’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 57-58.
[3]	WANG Yan, LIU Zhenshan, ZHANG Jing, YANG Pengfei, MA Lan, WANG Zhiyi, TU Hongxia, YANG Shaofeng, WANG Hao, CHEN Tao, WANG Xiaorong. Inheritance Trend of Flower and Fruit Traits in F₁ Progenies of Chinese Cherry [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(9): 1853-1865.
[4]	MI Baobin, XIE Lingling, XIAO Wei, DAI Xiongze, ZHANG Zhuqing, WANG Duanhua, ZHOU Huoqiang. Genetic Law of Fruit and Seed Traits of Wax Gourd and Path Analysis of Single Fruit Weight [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(12): 2414-2426.
[5]	ZHANG Xiaoyong, LI Shujiang, YAN Kai, WENG Guiying, ZHANG Yunxia, LONG Qiaofang, LIANG Wen, JIANG Qinna, YANG Youlian. Screening and Culture Characteristics of Biocontrol Strains of Postharvest Anthracnose of Mango [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(11): 2171-2184.
[6]	WANG Hong，YUE Kun，YANG Chengkun，GUO Yujian，WANG Peixuan，and ZHOU Kaibing. Physiological Reasons for Inhibiting Photosynthesis of Mango Leaves by Enhanced UV-B Radiation [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2020, 47(2): 242-252.
[7]	ZHOU Kaibing*，LI Shijun，YUAN Mengling，and YUE Kun. Injuries and the Responses on Antioxidation of Adult Mango Trees Under the Treatments of Enhanced UV-B Radiation [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2019, 46(7): 1279-1289.
[8]	MA Xiaowei，MA Yongli，WU Hongxia，ZHOU Yigang，SU Muqing，and WANG Songbiao*. Assessment of Mineral Elements Contents at the Mango Germplasm Level Based on Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2018, 45(7): 1371-1381.
[9]	ZHOU Ningning，LI Shubin，LI Yuanbo，JIAN Hongying，YAN Huijun，WANG Qigang，CHEN Min，QIU Xianqin，ZHANG Hao，and TANG Kaixue*. Hybrids Identification and Genetic Analysis in Diploid Roses Population （F₁）Using SSR Markers [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2017, 44(1): 151-160.
[10]	HUANG Guo-di*，LI Ri-wang，GUO Li-mei，MO Yong-long，ZHAO Ying，ZHANG Yu，and CHEN Yong-sen. A New Mango Cultivar‘Guiremang 4’ [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2016, 43(S2): 2719-2720.
[11]	MA Xiao-wei，YANG Ying-di，WU Hong-xia，ZHOU Yi-gang，and WANG Song-biao* . Diversity Analysis of Volatile in Mature Fruits of Mango Germplasm [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2016, 43(7): 1267-1274.
[12]	WU Lang，LIU Jing-yi，and LIANG Yan*. Inheritance on Fruit Color Character Between Green and Red of Tomato [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2016, 43(4): 674-682.
[13]	ZHANG Cui-xian，ZHANG Fa-ming，CHEN Yu-fu，XIE De-hong，LONG Ya-qin，ZHANG Hui-yun，GAO Xian-yu，ZHANG Yong-chao，and NI Zhang-guang*. A New Mango Cultivar‘Dazhai Huangxin’ [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2015, 42(S2): 2867-2868.
[14]	GE Hai-yan，LIU Yang，and CHEN Huo-ying. QTL Analysis of Fruit-Associated Traits in Eggplant [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2015, 42(11): 2197-2205.
[15]	LONG Ya-qin1，ZHANG Shi-yun2，XIE De-hong1，ZHAO Zhong-hai2，CHEN Yu-fu1，ZHANG Cui-xian1，ZHANG Fa-ming1，LUO Xin-ping1，and NI Zhang-guang1,*. A New Mango Cultivar‘Yunre-5007’ [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2014, 41(6): 1271-1272.