Correlation Between Anatomical Structure and Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Chinese Wild Vitis Species

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0367

Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1200-1212.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0367

• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles

Correlation Between Anatomical Structure and Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Chinese Wild Vitis Species

WEI Xiaoyu, WANG Yuejin()

State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas,Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Germplasm Resource Utilization in Northwest China,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,College of Horticulture,Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China

Received:2021-10-05 Revised:2022-01-29 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-04
Contact: WANG Yuejin E-mail:wangyj@nwsuaf.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

Ten different of grape berries（including Vitis davidii Foëx,V. quinquangularis,V. pseudoreticulata and V. vinifera‘Thompson Seedless’）were used as materials to explore the relationship between grape fruit epidermis tissue structure and powdery mildew resistance. The results showed that the following grapes showed disease resistance：V. davidii‘Tangwei’,‘Fujian-4’;V. quinquangularis ‘Danfeng-2’,‘Taishan-12’,‘Shang-24’,V. vinifera‘Thompson Seedless’,‘Red Globe’and‘Carinena’are susceptible varieties. The cuticle of the epidermis of Chinese wild V. davidii,V. quinquangularis and V. pseudoreticulata were thicker than that of European grape. The cuticle of the epidermis of V. davidii and V. quinquangularis were regularly arrangedand tight,and the epidermis of V. vinifera‘Thompson Seedless’was thinnest,the epidermal cuticle was the thinnest and the cells of the epidermal layer of the fruit skin were irregularly shaped and loosely arranged. The epidermis and subepidermis of V. davidii‘Tangwei’were the thickest,followed by V. quinquangularis‘Danfeng-2’and V. pseudoreticulata‘Baihe 35-1’,and the epidermis and subepidermis of V. vinifera‘Thompson Seedless’were the thinnest. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the thickness of cuticle and epidermal layer of fruit skin and resistance to powdery mildew in grapes,and the cuticle and epidermal layer thicknesses of fruit skin of disease-resistant plants were generally thicker than those of disease-susceptible plants.

Key words: Chinese wild Vitis grapevine, fruit, anatomical structure, cuticles, epidermis, powdery mildew, disease-resistance

CLC Number:

S663.1

WEI Xiaoyu, WANG Yuejin. Correlation Between Anatomical Structure and Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Chinese Wild Vitis Species[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(6): 1200-1212.

Figures/Tables 9

References 42

[1]	Aarrouf J, Garcin A, Lizzi Y, Maâtaoui M E. 2008. Immunolocalization and histocytopathological effects of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni on naturally infected leaf and fruit tissues of peach(Prunus persica L. Batsch). Journal of Phytopathology, 156:338-345. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01364.x URL
[2]	Bally I S E. 1999. Changes in the cuticular surface during the development of mango(Mangifera indica L.)cv. Kensington Pride. Scientia Horticulturae, 79 (1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00159-9 URL
[3]	Bargel H, Neinhuis C. 2005. Tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)fruit growth and ripening as related to the biomechanical properties of fruit skin and isolated cuticle. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56 (413):1049-1060. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri098 URL
[4]	Bechinger C, Giebel K F, Schnell M, Leiderer P, Deising H B, Bastmeyer M. 1999. Optical measurements of invasive forces exerted by appressoria of a plant pathogenic fungus. Science, 285 (5435):1896-1899. pmid: 10489364
[5]	Chang Jin-mei, Zhang Lu-bin, Liu Feng, Zhan Ru-lin. 2012. The relationship between the disease resistance and pericarp structure in mango (Mangifern indica). Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 33 (11):2040-2043. (in Chinese)
	常金梅, 张鲁斌, 柳凤, 詹儒林. 2012. 芒果果实抗病性差异及其与果皮结构相关性初探. 热带作物学报, 33 (11):2040-2043.
[6]	Comménil P, Brunet L, Audran J C. 1997. The development of the grape berry cuticle in relation to susceptibility to bunch rot disease. Journal of Experimental Botany, 48 (313):1599-1607. doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.8.1599 URL
[7]	de Leeuw G T N. 1985. Deposition of lignin,suberin and callose in relation to the restriction of infection by Botrytis cinerea in ghost spots of tomato fruits. Journal of Phytopathology, 112 (2):143-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1985.tb04822.x URL
[8]	Domínguez E, Heredia-Guerrero J A, Heredia A. 2011. The biophysical design of plant cuticles:an overview. New Phytologist, 189 (4):938-949. pmid: 21374891
[9]	FAO. 2019. FAO-OIV focus 2019 table and dried grapes:non-alcoholic products of the Vitivinicultural sector intended for human consumption. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/.
[10]	Gabler F M, Smilanick J L, Ghosoph J M, Margosan D A. 2005. Impact of postharvest hot water or ethanol treatment of table grapes on gray mold incidence,quality,and ethanol content. Plant Disease, 89 (3):309-316. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0309 URL
[11]	Gabler F M, Smilanick J L, Mansour M, Ramming D W, Mackey B E. 2003. Correlations ofmorphological,anatomical,and chemical features of grape berries with resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology, 93 (10):1263-1273. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.10.1263 URL
[12]	Gao Hai-yan, Liu Lin-wei, Zhang Hua-yun, Xiu De-ren. 2001. Study of SO₂ acute injury on postharvest table grape. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 10 (1):14-16. (in Chinese)
	高海燕, 刘邻渭, 张华云, 修德仁. 2001. SO₂对采后葡萄的急性伤害研究. 西北农业学报, 10 (1):14-16.
[13]	Guan Ye-qing. 2015. Role of surface structure on susceptibility of apple fruit to Botryosphaeria dothidea[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Beijing:China Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	关晔晴. 2015. 苹果果面结构与轮纹病抗病性关系的研究[博士论文]. 北京: 中国农业大学.
[14]	Hansjakob A, Riederer M, Hildebrandt U. 2011. Wax matters:absence of very-long-chain aldehydes from the leaf cuticular wax of the glossy11 mutant of maize compromises the prepenetration processes of Blumeria graminis. Plant Pathology, 60 (6):1151-1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02467.x URL
[15]	He Pu-chao. 1999. Grapeology. Beijing: Agriculture Press. (in Chinese)
	贺普超. 1999. 葡萄学. 北京: 农业出版社.
[16]	He Pu-chao, Wang Yue-jin, Wang Guo-Ying, Ren Zhi-bang, He Chun-cheng. 1991. The studies on the disease-resistance of Vitis wild species originated in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 24 (3):50-56. (in Chinese)
	贺普超, 王跃进, 王国英, 任治邦, 和纯成. 1991. 中国葡萄属野生种抗病性的研究. 中国农业科学, 24 (3):50-56.
[17]	Heredia-Guerrero J A, Guzman-Puyol S, Benitez J J, Athanassiou A, Heredia A, Dominguez E. 2018. Plant cuticle under global change:biophysical implications. Glob Chang Biol, 24 (7):2749-2751. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14276 URL
[18]	Hetzroni A, Vana A, Mizrach A. 2011. Biomechanical characteristics of tomato fruit peels. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 59 (1):80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.08.008 URL
[19]	Isabel L, Burcu B, Luis F G. 2014. The fruit cuticle as a modulator of postharvest quality. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 87:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.08.012 URL
[20]	Konarska A. 2012. Differences in the fruit peel structures between two apple cultivars during storage. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Hortorum Cultus, 11 (2):105-116.
[21]	Lafuente M T, GonzcLlez-Candelas L, Reig-Armiclana J, Veyrat A, Cajuste J F, Garcca-Breijo F J. 2010. Epicuticular wax content and morphology as related to ethylene and storage performance of‘Navelate’orange fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 55 (1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.07.005 URL
[22]	Lewandowska M, Keyl A, Feussner I. 2020. Wax biosynthesis in response to danger:its regulation upon abiotic and biotic stress. New Phytologist, 227 (3):698-713. doi: 10.1111/nph.16571 pmid: 32242934
[23]	Marois J J, Bledsoe A M, Gubler G. 1985. Effects of surfactants on epicuticular wax and infection of grape berries by Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology, 75:1329.
[24]	Marois J J, Nelson J K, Morrison J C, Lile L S, Bledso A M. 1986. The influence of berry contact within grape clusters on the development of Botrytis cinerea and epicuticular wax. Am J Enol Vitic, 37:293-296.
[25]	Oliveira L L, Quilot-Turion B, Dufour C, Corre M N, Lessire R, Genard M, Poessel J L. 2020. Cuticular waxes of nectarines during fruit development in relation to surface conductance and susceptibility to Monilinia laxa. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71 (18):5521-5537. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa284 pmid: 32556164
[26]	Scott R J, Spielman M, Dickinson H G. 2004. Stamen structure and function. Plant Cell, 16 (Suppl):S46-S60. doi: 10.1105/tpc.017012 URL
[27]	Sharma P, Prasad J, Kothari S L, Gour V S. 2020. Evaluation of variation in cuticular wax yield with season,solvent,and species in Calotropis. National Academy Science Letters-India, 43 (1):99-101.
[28]	Silva A, Noronha H, Dai Z, Delrot S, Geros H. 2017. Low source-sink ratio reduces reserve starch in grapevine woody canes and modulates sugar transport and metabolism at transcriptional and enzyme activity levels. Planta, 246 (3):525-535. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2708-6 URL
[29]	Suzuki T, Shinogi T, Narusaka Y, Park P. 2003. Infection behavior of Alternaria alternata Japanese pear pathotype and localization of 1,3-beta-D-glucan in compatible and incompatible interactions between the pathogen and host plants. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 2 (69):91-100.
[30]	Tian Xin. 2012. Study on the relationship between the physical structure,enzymatic activities and fruit shrink disease resistance in different jujube varieties[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University. (in Chinese)
	田昕. 2012. 不同枣树品种果实结构和酶活性与缩果病抗性关系分析[博士论文]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
[31]	Wang Y, Liu Y, He P, Chen J, Lamikanra O, Lu J. 1995. Evaluation of foliar resistance to Uncinula necator in Chinese wild vitis species. Vitis, 34 (3):159-164.
[32]	Wang Yue-jin, He Pu-chao. 1997. Study on the inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew in Chinese native wild Vitis L. species. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 30 (1):20-26. (in Chinese)
	王跃进, 贺普超. 1997. 中国葡萄属野生种叶片抗白粉病遗传研究. 中国农业科学, 30 (1):20-26.
[33]	Wang Yuejin, He Pu-chao, Zhang Jian-xia. 1999. Studies on the methods of resistance to Uncinula necator in Vitis. Journal of Northwest A & F University,(5):6-10. (in Chinese)
	王跃进, 贺普超, 张剑侠. 1999. 葡萄抗白粉病鉴定方法的研究. 西北农业大学学报,(5):6-10.
[34]	Wu Fengying, Liu Mengqi, Wang Yuejin. 2020. Function analysis of the stilbene synthase genes VqSTS12 and VqSTS25of the resistance topowdery mildew in Vitis quinquanqularis. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (2):205-219.. (in Chinese)
	吴凤颖, 刘梦琦, 王跃进. 2020. 中国野生毛葡萄芪合酶基因抗白粉病功能分析. 园艺学报, 47 (2):205-219.
[35]	Xie X, Wang Y. 2016. VqDUF642,a gene isolated from the Chinese grape Vitis quinquangularis,is involved in berry development and pathogen resistance. Planta, 244 (5):1075-1094. doi: 10.1007/s00425-016-2569-4 URL
[36]	Yang M, Luo Z, Gao S, Belwal T, Wang L, Qi M, Ban Z, Wu B, Wang F, Li L. 2021. The chemical composition and potential role of epicuticular and intracuticular wax in four cultivars of table grapes. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 173:111430. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111430 URL
[37]	Yao W, Wang L, Wang J, Ma F, Yang Y, Wang C, Tong W, Zhang J, Xu Y, Wang X, Zhang C, Wang Y. 2017. VpPUB24,a novel gene from Chinese grapevine,Vitis pseudoreticulata,targets VpICE 1 to enhance cold tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68 (11):2933-2949. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx136 URL
[38]	Yeats T H, Rose J K C. 2013. The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiology, 163 (1):5-20. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.222737 URL
[39]	Yu Meng-meng, Shen Lin, Sheng Ji-ping. 2012. MeJA-Induced disease resistance in postharvest tomato fruits. Food Science, 33 (9):11-15. (in Chinese)
	于萌萌, 申琳, 生吉萍. 2012. 茉莉酸甲酯诱导采后番茄果实抗病的作用. 食品科学, 33 (9):11-15.
[40]	Yu Yi-he. 2013. Fuction study on the disease-resistance to powdery mildew of ubiquitin ligase gene from Chinese wild Vitis pseudoreticulata.[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University. (in Chinese)
	余义和. 2013. 中国野生华东葡萄泛素连接酶基因抗白粉病功能研究[博士论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
[41]	Yuan Shu-zhi, Ding Xin-yuan, Wang Jiao, Li Li-li, Cao Jian-kang. 2015. Progress in studies on the structural resistance of fruit tissues after harvest. Food Science, 36 (7):206-210. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1971.tb04025.x URL
	袁树枝, 丁薪源, 王姣, 李丽莉, 曹建康. 2015. 采后果实组织结构抗病性研究进展. 食品科学, 36 (7):206-210.
[42]	Zhou Hui-ling, Li Jia-rui. 2006. The relationship between fruit texture and storage character in grapes. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 33 (1):28-32. (in Chinese)
	周会玲, 李嘉瑞. 2006. 葡萄果实组织结构与耐贮性的关系. 园艺学报, 33 (1):28-32.

种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivaror Clone	田间自然发病		人工接种		综合抗性反应 Resistance response
		Under natural in the field		Artificial inoculation
		病情指数 Susceptibility index	表现型 Phenotype	病情指数 Susceptibility index	表现型 Phenotype
欧洲葡萄 Vitis vinifera	无核白 Thompson Seedless	56.09	高感 High susceptible	66.03	高感High susceptible	5
	红地球 Red Globe	27.24	感病 Susceptible	45.24	感病 Susceptible	4
	佳丽酿 Carinena	17.60	抗病 Resistance	43.80	感病 Susceptible	4
华东葡萄	湖南-1 Hunan-1	54.91	高感 High susceptible	74.91	高感 High susceptible	5
V. pseudoreticulata	白河35-1 Baihe 35-1	19.65	抗病 Resistance	29.65	感病 Susceptible	4
毛葡萄	丹凤-2 Danfeng-2	2.30	高抗 High resistance	5.30	抗病 Resistance	3
V. quinquangularis	商-24 Shang-24	4.12	高抗 High resistance	6.12	抗病 Resistance	3
	泰山-12 Taishan-12	5.35	抗病 Resistance	6.35	抗病 Resistance	3
刺葡萄 V. davidii	福建-4 Fujian-4	0	不感病Not susceptible	1.80	高抗 High resistance	1 ~ 2
	塘尾 Tangwei	0	不感病 Not susceptible	2.30	高抗 High resistance	1 ~ 2

种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivaror Clone	田间自然发病		人工接种		综合抗性反应 Resistance response
		Under natural in the field		Artificial inoculation
		病情指数 Susceptibility index	表现型 Phenotype	病情指数 Susceptibility index	表现型 Phenotype
欧洲葡萄 Vitis vinifera	无核白 Thompson Seedless	56.09	高感 High susceptible	66.03	高感High susceptible	5
	红地球 Red Globe	27.24	感病 Susceptible	45.24	感病 Susceptible	4
	佳丽酿 Carinena	17.60	抗病 Resistance	43.80	感病 Susceptible	4
华东葡萄	湖南-1 Hunan-1	54.91	高感 High susceptible	74.91	高感 High susceptible	5
V. pseudoreticulata	白河35-1 Baihe 35-1	19.65	抗病 Resistance	29.65	感病 Susceptible	4
毛葡萄	丹凤-2 Danfeng-2	2.30	高抗 High resistance	5.30	抗病 Resistance	3
V. quinquangularis	商-24 Shang-24	4.12	高抗 High resistance	6.12	抗病 Resistance	3
	泰山-12 Taishan-12	5.35	抗病 Resistance	6.35	抗病 Resistance	3
刺葡萄 V. davidii	福建-4 Fujian-4	0	不感病Not susceptible	1.80	高抗 High resistance	1 ~ 2
	塘尾 Tangwei	0	不感病 Not susceptible	2.30	高抗 High resistance	1 ~ 2

种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	角质层厚度/μm Thickness of cuticle			细胞排列 Cellular state
种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	绿果期 Green hard	转色期 Berry veraison	成熟期 Berry ripening	细胞排列 Cellular state
欧洲葡萄 Vitis vinifera	无核白 Thompson Seedless	5.61 ± 0.33 c	9.31 ± 0.49 e	7.69 ± 0.19 g	平整 Flat
	红地球 Red Globe	5.56 ± 0.29 c	8.83 ± 0.25 e	9.17 ± 0.30 f	较为平整 Relatively flat
	佳丽酿 Carinena	8.79 ± 0.44 b	12.73 ± 0.16 d	14.53 ± 0.39 de	平整光滑 Flat and smooth
华东葡萄	白河35-1 Baihe 35-1	8.55 ± 0.28 b	12.48 ± 0.33 d	15.37 ± 0.28 d	较光滑 Relatively smooth
V. pseudoreticulata	湖南-1 Hunan-1	9.41 ± 0.31 b	13.86 ± 18.27 cd	13.81 ± 0.37 e	较平整 Relatively flat
毛葡萄	丹凤-2 Danfeng-2	10.47 ± 0.73 a	13.21 ± 0.36 d	19.05 ± 0.26 ab	较为平整 Relatively flat
V. quinquangularis	商-24 Shang-24	10.04 ± 0.22 ab	15.73 ± 0.43 b	18.23 ± 0.25 b	光滑较规则 Smooth,relatively regular
	泰山-12 Taishan-12	10.08 ± 0.26 ab	14.47 ± 0.56 c	17.26 ± 0.35 c	光滑规则 Smooth and regular
刺葡萄	福建-4 Fujian-4	9.51 ± 0.27 ab	18.64 ± 0.59 a	18.61 ± 0.42 ab	规则较光滑 Regular,relatively smooth
V. davidii	塘尾 Tangwei	9.86 ± 0.22 ab	19.34 ± 0.55 a	19.41 ± 0.39 a	规则光滑 Regular and smooth

种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	角质层厚度/μm Thickness of cuticle			细胞排列 Cellular state
种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	绿果期 Green hard	转色期 Berry veraison	成熟期 Berry ripening	细胞排列 Cellular state
欧洲葡萄 Vitis vinifera	无核白 Thompson Seedless	5.61 ± 0.33 c	9.31 ± 0.49 e	7.69 ± 0.19 g	平整 Flat
	红地球 Red Globe	5.56 ± 0.29 c	8.83 ± 0.25 e	9.17 ± 0.30 f	较为平整 Relatively flat
	佳丽酿 Carinena	8.79 ± 0.44 b	12.73 ± 0.16 d	14.53 ± 0.39 de	平整光滑 Flat and smooth
华东葡萄	白河35-1 Baihe 35-1	8.55 ± 0.28 b	12.48 ± 0.33 d	15.37 ± 0.28 d	较光滑 Relatively smooth
V. pseudoreticulata	湖南-1 Hunan-1	9.41 ± 0.31 b	13.86 ± 18.27 cd	13.81 ± 0.37 e	较平整 Relatively flat
毛葡萄	丹凤-2 Danfeng-2	10.47 ± 0.73 a	13.21 ± 0.36 d	19.05 ± 0.26 ab	较为平整 Relatively flat
V. quinquangularis	商-24 Shang-24	10.04 ± 0.22 ab	15.73 ± 0.43 b	18.23 ± 0.25 b	光滑较规则 Smooth,relatively regular
	泰山-12 Taishan-12	10.08 ± 0.26 ab	14.47 ± 0.56 c	17.26 ± 0.35 c	光滑规则 Smooth and regular
刺葡萄	福建-4 Fujian-4	9.51 ± 0.27 ab	18.64 ± 0.59 a	18.61 ± 0.42 ab	规则较光滑 Regular,relatively smooth
V. davidii	塘尾 Tangwei	9.86 ± 0.22 ab	19.34 ± 0.55 a	19.41 ± 0.39 a	规则光滑 Regular and smooth

种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	表皮细胞厚度/μm Epidermal cell thickness			表皮细胞 Epidermal cell
种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	绿果期 Green hard	转色期 Berry veraison	成熟期 Berry ripening	层数 Layers	细胞排列 Cellular state
欧洲葡萄 Vitis vinifera	无核白 Thompson Seedless	11.56 ± 0.38 g	15.89 ± 1.34 d	19.47 ± 1.31 a	2	较松散 Relatively loose
	红地球 Red Globe	12.37 ± 0.41 g	14.61 ± 0.78 d	48.97 ± 0.58 a	2	松散 Loose
	佳丽酿 Carinena	19.22 ± 0.46 cd	17.89 ± 0.81 cd	29.68 ± 1.26 b	2 ~ 3	紧密 Tightly
华东葡萄	白河35-1 Baihe-35-1	19.09 ± 0.39 d	19.61 ± 0.34 c	28.54 ± 0.66 b	2	较紧密 Relatively tight
V. pseudoreticulata	湖南-1 Hunan-1	16.26 ± 0.38 f	17.41 ± 0.29 cd	27.94 ± 0.75 b	2	较紧密 Relatively tight
毛葡萄	丹凤-2 Danfeng-2	25.15 ± 0.36 ab	24.59 ± 1.52 b	22.09 ± 1.11 c	2	非常紧密 Very tightly
V. quinquangularis	商-24 Shang-24	20.49 ± 0.44 c	25.08 ± 0.84 b	20.62 ± 0.61 c	2	非常紧密 Very tightly
	泰山-12 Taishan-12	17.74 ± 0.83 e	19.06 ± 0.75 c	17.90 ± 0.34 d	2	非常紧密 Very tightly
刺葡萄	福建-4 Fujian-4	24.28 ± 0.56 b	30.26 ± 0.82 a	15.58 ± 0.47 d	2 ~ 3	非常紧密 Very tightly
V. davidii	塘尾 Tangwei	26.49 ± 0.31 a	30.80 ± 1.10 a	12.09 ± 0.42 e	2 ~ 3	非常紧密 Very tightly

Correlation Between Anatomical Structure and Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Chinese Wild Vitis Species

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 42

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

时期 Stage	指标 Item	病情指数 Disease index	绿果期 Green hard				转色期 Berry veraison				成熟期 Berry ripening
时期 Stage	指标 Item	病情指数 Disease index	C	E	S	W	C	E	S	W	C	E	S
绿果期Green hard	C	-0.728^*
	E	-0.683^*	0.806^**
	S	-0.545	0.401	0.731*
	W	-0.586	0.664^*	0.403	0.108
转色期Berry veraison	C	-0.750^*	0.767^**	0.835^**	0.810^**	0.335
	E	-0.719^*	0.651^*	0.908^**	0.827^**	0.336	0.906^**
	S	-0.644^*	0.518	0.841^**	0.966^**	0.116	0.881^**	0.913^**
	W	-0.197	0.554	0.540	0.567	0.227	0.572	0.439	0.501
成熟期Berry ripening	C	-0.764^*	0.942^**	0.927^**	0.617	0.646^*	0.854^**	0.827^**	0.716^*	0.550
	E	-0.660^*	0.567	0.869^**	0.951^**	0.139	0.894^**	0.924^**	0.993^**	0.558	0.750^*
	S	-0.643^*	0.431	0.773^**	0.959^**	0.061	0.850^**	0.881^**	0.988^**	0.405	0.644^*	0.970^**
	W	-0.758^*	0.782^**	0.892^**	0.778^**	0.636^*	0.821^**	0.866^**	0.801^**	0.651^*	0.905^**	0.830^**	0.736^*

[1]	YANG Zhi, ZHANG Chuanjiang, YANG Xinfang, DONG Mengyi, WANG Zhenlei, YAN Fenfen, WU Cuiyun, WANG Jiurui, LIU Mengjun, LIN Minjuan. Analysis of Fruit Genetic Tendency and Mixed Inheritance in Hybrid Progeny of Jujube and Wild Jujube [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 36-52.
[2]	YUAN Xin, XU Yunhe, ZHANG Yupei, SHAN Nan, CHEN Chuying, WAN Chunpeng, KAI Wenbin, ZHAI Xiawan, CHEN Jinyin, GAN Zengyu. Studies on AcAREB1 Regulating the Expression of AcGH3.1 During Postharvest Ripening of Kiwifruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 53-64.
[3]	SHAO Fengqing, LUO Xiurong, WANG Qi, ZHANG Xianzhi, WANG Wencai. Advances in Research of DNA Methylation Regulation During Fruit Ripening [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 197-208.
[4]	WANG Yingying, LIU Lichang, LIU Zhiwu, YANG Xingwang, LIU Wanchun, and WANG Xiaodi, . A New Little Nectarine Cultivar‘Zhongnong Zhenzhu’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 25-26.
[5]	SONG Fang, CHEN Qi, YUAN Yanliang, CHEN Sha, YIN Haijun, and JIANG Yingchun, . A New Yellow-fleshed Kiwifruit Cultivar‘Xianwo 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 47-48.
[6]	QI Yongjie, GAO Zhenghui, MA Na, WANG Qingming, KE Fanjun, CHEN Qian, and XU Yiliu, . A New Yellow Flesh and Resistant to Canker Disease Kiwifruit Cultivar ‘Wannong Jinguo’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 49-50.
[7]	ZHANG Huiqin, LOU Guorong, LU Linghong, GU Xianbin, SONG Genhua, and XIE Ming. A New Yellow-fleshed Kiwifruit Cultivar‘Jinyi’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 51-52.
[8]	Patiguli Maimaitituerxun, Gulinisha Kasimu, LUO Qinghong, LIU Liyan, LIU Qiaoling, and Reyihan Awutitashi. A New Cultivar of Elaeagnus moorcroftii‘Yafeng’in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 69-70.
[9]	ZHAO Xia, LI Gang, LIU Lifeng, SONG Yanhong, and ZHOU Houcheng. A New Strawberry Cultivar‘Huashuo 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 81-82.
[10]	LI Zhengli, ZHANG Li, and MA Licang. A New Capsicum frutescens Cultivar‘Huangla Chaotian’with Yellow Fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 123-124.
[11]	GAO Zhihong, NI Zhaojun, SHI Ting, HAN Jian, and ZHANG Zhen. A Novel Cultivar of Prunus mume‘Nannong Fengyu’for Ornamental Value and Fruit Production [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 259-260.
[12]	LU Lu, LI Wenqing, WU Dan, WANG Zhen, LIU Li, WANG Lei, XIE Xiaoman, and ZHAO Yongjun, . A New Xanthoceras sorbifolium Cultivar‘Xiaozhenzhu’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 275-276.
[13]	QIN Gaihua, LIU Chunyan, LI Jiyu, and XU Yiliu, . A New Pomegranate Cultivar‘Suzi’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 39-40.
[14]	WANG Yan, LIU Zhenshan, ZHANG Jing, YANG Pengfei, MA Lan, WANG Zhiyi, TU Hongxia, YANG Shaofeng, WANG Hao, CHEN Tao, WANG Xiaorong. Inheritance Trend of Flower and Fruit Traits in F₁ Progenies of Chinese Cherry [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(9): 1853-1865.
[15]	MENG Xiaoyu, MU Yue, HU Yang, WU Xiao, ZHU Chen, WANG Huimin, TAO Shutian, ZHANG Shaoling, YIN Hao. Determination of Fruit Surface Area of Several Fruit by 3D Laser Scanning Technology [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(9): 1998-2006.

种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	亚表皮细胞厚度/μm Sub Epidermal cell thickness			亚表皮细胞层数 Subepidermal cell layers	细胞排列 Cellular state
种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	绿果期 Green hard	转色期 Berry veraison	成熟期 Berry ripening	亚表皮细胞层数 Subepidermal cell layers	细胞排列 Cellular state
欧洲葡萄 Vitis vinifera	无核白 Thompson Seedless	125.77 ± 5.60 e	127.00 ± 5.36 f	128.16 ± 1.48 d	3	疏松 Loose
	红地球 Red Globe	132.02 ± 4.69 e	143.95 ± 3.73 e	166.84 ± 9.58 c	3 ~ 5	疏松 Loose
	佳丽酿 Carinena	198.43 ± 3.28 b	193.69 ± 4.16 b	190.31 ± 7.63 b	5 ~ 6	致密 Tightly
华东葡萄	白河35-1 Baihe-35-1	148.47 ± 1.00 d	162.49 ± 3.72 d	154.58 ± 14.26 c	6 ~ 8	疏松 Loose
V. pseudoreticulata	湖南-1 Hunan-1	100.18 ± 3.01 f	142.81 ± 3.63 e	143.77 ± 3.85 cd	6 ~ 8	疏松 Loose
毛葡萄 V. quinquangularis	丹凤-2 Danfeng-2	151.01 ± 7.99 d	192.80 ± 5.97 b	188.03 ± 9.90 bc	7 ~ 9	致密 Tightly
	商-24 Shang-24	168.99 ± 3.56 c	183.55 ± 4.96 bc	187.65 ± 3.07 bc	7 ~ 8	致密 Tightly
	泰山-12 Taishan-12	175.23 ± 7.99 c	176.04 ± 2.28 c	182.09 ± 1.50 bc	8 ~ 9	致密 Tightly
刺葡萄	福建-4 Fujian-4	279.77 ± 4.08 a	292.06 ± 4.09 a	311.04 ± 11.77 a	10 ~ 12	致密 Tightly
V. davidii	塘尾 Tangwei	284.11 ± 5.93 a	301.81 ± 4.07 a	334.42 ± 7.24 a	9 ~ 12	致密Tightly

种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	亚表皮细胞厚度/μm Sub Epidermal cell thickness			亚表皮细胞层数 Subepidermal cell layers	细胞排列 Cellular state
种 Species	品种或株系 Cultivar or clone	绿果期 Green hard	转色期 Berry veraison	成熟期 Berry ripening	亚表皮细胞层数 Subepidermal cell layers	细胞排列 Cellular state
欧洲葡萄 Vitis vinifera	无核白 Thompson Seedless	125.77 ± 5.60 e	127.00 ± 5.36 f	128.16 ± 1.48 d	3	疏松 Loose
	红地球 Red Globe	132.02 ± 4.69 e	143.95 ± 3.73 e	166.84 ± 9.58 c	3 ~ 5	疏松 Loose
	佳丽酿 Carinena	198.43 ± 3.28 b	193.69 ± 4.16 b	190.31 ± 7.63 b	5 ~ 6	致密 Tightly
华东葡萄	白河35-1 Baihe-35-1	148.47 ± 1.00 d	162.49 ± 3.72 d	154.58 ± 14.26 c	6 ~ 8	疏松 Loose
V. pseudoreticulata	湖南-1 Hunan-1	100.18 ± 3.01 f	142.81 ± 3.63 e	143.77 ± 3.85 cd	6 ~ 8	疏松 Loose
毛葡萄 V. quinquangularis	丹凤-2 Danfeng-2	151.01 ± 7.99 d	192.80 ± 5.97 b	188.03 ± 9.90 bc	7 ~ 9	致密 Tightly
	商-24 Shang-24	168.99 ± 3.56 c	183.55 ± 4.96 bc	187.65 ± 3.07 bc	7 ~ 8	致密 Tightly
	泰山-12 Taishan-12	175.23 ± 7.99 c	176.04 ± 2.28 c	182.09 ± 1.50 bc	8 ~ 9	致密 Tightly
刺葡萄	福建-4 Fujian-4	279.77 ± 4.08 a	292.06 ± 4.09 a	311.04 ± 11.77 a	10 ~ 12	致密 Tightly
V. davidii	塘尾 Tangwei	284.11 ± 5.93 a	301.81 ± 4.07 a	334.42 ± 7.24 a	9 ~ 12	致密Tightly