白菜EST-SSR信息分析与标记的建立

园艺学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 549-554.

白菜EST-SSR信息分析与标记的建立

忻　雅^{1, 3};崔海瑞^1*;卢美贞¹;姚艳玲¹;金基强¹;林容杓²;崔水莲²

(¹ 浙江大学农业与生物技术学院原子核农业科学研究所, 浙江杭州310029; ²忠南大学园艺系, 大田305764, 韩国; ³ 杭州市农业科学研究院生物研究所, 浙江杭州310024)

收稿日期:2005-07-14 修回日期:2005-11-14 出版日期:2006-06-25 发布日期:2006-06-25

Data Mining for SSRs in ESTs and EST-SSR Marker Development in Chinese Cabbage

Xin Ya^{1, 3};Cui Hairui^1*;Lu Meizhen¹;Yao Yanling¹;Jin Jiqiang¹;Lim Yongpyo²;Choi Suryun²

(¹Institute of Nuclear and Agricultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310029, China; ²Department of Horticulture, Chungnam National University, Taejeon 3052764, Korea; ³Biotechnology Research Institute, Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China)

Received:2005-07-14 Revised:2005-11-14 Online:2006-06-25 Published:2006-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 数量迅速增加的EST为开发新的SSR标记提供了宝贵的资源。本研究对4 584条白菜EST进行了搜索, 共检索出474个SSR, 检出率为10.3% , 包括40种重复基元。其中二核苷酸和三核苷酸重复单元的EST-SSR占主导地位, 二者出现的频率基本相近, 占总SSR的近83%; 其它重复类型所占比例均不足5%。GA和GAA是二、三核苷酸中的优势重复类型, 分别占二、三核苷酸重复类型的71.5%和37.5%。设计了15对EST-SSR引物, 在合适的PCR反应体系下, 以构建EST的白菜自交系A的DNA为模板, 对设计的EST-SSR引物进行筛选, 发现15对EST-SSR引物都能扩增出产物。进一步用这些可扩增的引物对28个白菜品种进行PCR扩增, 发现7对引物显示多态性, 占引物总数的46.7%。此结果表明, 根据EST建立EST-SSR标记是一条简便而又有效的途径。

关键词: 白菜, EST, SSR信息, 标记

Abstract: Expressed sequence tags ( ESTs) , increased rapidly in number recently, are important resources for development of new SSR markers. In this study, 4 584 ESTs of Chinese cabbage were screened and 474 SSRs including 40 kinds of repeat motifs were mined out, accounting for 10.3% of ESTs. Dinucleotide
and trinucleotide repeats, with similar frequency and accounting for 83% together in all SSRs, were dominant, while the frequency for other repeat type is below 5% each. GA and GAA are the most frequentmotifs, accounting of 71.5% and 37.5% in dinucleotide and trinucleotide repeats respectively. 15 primer pairs for EST-SSRs were designed. Under a suitable PCR system, primers were screened against genomic DNA of inbred line A from which the cDNA library was constructed, and all the 15 primer pairs showed the amplification. Then all the primers available were subjected to PCR for DNAs from 28 Chinese cabbage varieties and 7 primer sets showed polymorphisms, accounting for 46.7% of total primers tested. Results indicate that it is a
simple and effective approach to develop SSR markers based on ESTs.

Key words: Chinese cabbage, EST, SSR information, Marker development

忻　雅;;崔海瑞;卢美贞;姚艳玲;金基强;林容杓;崔水莲. 白菜EST-SSR信息分析与标记的建立[J]. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(3): 549-554.

Xin Ya;;Cui Hairui;Lu Meizhen;Yao Yanling;Jin Jiqiang;Lim Yongpyo;Choi Suryun. Data Mining for SSRs in ESTs and EST-SSR Marker Development in Chinese Cabbage[J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2006, 33(3): 549-554.

[1]	汤雨晴, 杨惠栋, 闫承璞, 王斯妤, 王雨亭, 胡钟东, 朱方红. 基于重测序的‘金兰柚’基因组InDel标记的开发及应用[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 15-26.
[2]	崔建, 钟雄辉, 刘泽慈, 陈登辉, 李海龙, 韩睿, 乐祥庆, 康俊根, 王超. 结球甘蓝染色体片段替换系构建[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 65-78.
[3]	刘艺平, 倪梦辉, 吴芳芳, 刘红利, 贺丹, 孔德政. 荷花花器官性状与SSR标记的关联分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 103-115.
[4]	韩书辉, 韩彩锋, 韩书荣, 韩彩梅, 韩旭. 秋大白菜新品种‘胶研秋宝’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 83-84.
[5]	汪维红, 张凤兰, 余阳俊, 张德双, 赵岫云, 于拴仓, 苏同兵, 李佩荣, 辛晓云. 秋大白菜新品种‘京秋1518’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 85-86.
[6]	余阳俊, 汪维红, 苏同兵, 张凤兰, 张德双, 赵岫云, 于拴仓, 李佩荣, 辛晓云, 王姣. 抗根肿病耐抽薹大白菜新品种‘京春CR3’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 87-88.
[7]	王丽丽, 王鑫, 吴海东, 温蔷, 杨晓飞. 抗根肿病大白菜新品种‘辽白28’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 89-90.
[8]	余阳俊, 苏同兵, 张凤兰, 张德双, 赵岫云, 于拴仓, 汪维红, 李佩荣, 辛晓云, 王姣, 武长见. 紫色苗用型大白菜新品种‘京研紫快菜’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 91-92.
[9]	黄鹂, 陈财志, 余小林, 姚祥坦, 曹家树, . 早中熟普通白菜新品种‘浙大青’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 93-94.
[10]	吕红豪, 杨丽梅, 方智远, 张扬勇, 庄木, 刘玉梅, 王勇, 季家磊, 李占省, 韩风庆. 春甘蓝新品种‘中甘27’和‘中甘28’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 63-64.
[11]	徐立功, 韩太利, 孙继峰, 杨晓东, 谭金霞. 苗用大白菜新品种‘锦绿2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 67-68.
[12]	邵贵荣, 朱彬, 林晓, 曹萍, 方勇, 崔田, 蒋鹏, 林咏铭, 林魁, 林志滔. 白菜新品种‘金品008’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 69-70.
[13]	姜悦悦, 王田田, 赵阳, 汪承刚, 侯金锋, 袁凌云. 白菜新品种‘皖绿2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 71-72.
[14]	王惠哲, 杨瑞环, 邓强, 曹明明, 李淑菊, . 抗黑星病黄瓜新品种‘津冬369’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 85-86.
[15]	杨兴玉, 许林兵, 吴元立, 邱迪洋, 范琳琳, 黄秉智. 香蕉杂交种‘粉杂1号’ABBB基因组鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(9): 1991-1997.