园艺学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 3303-3321.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0998
张换换1, 李旭娇1, 姚东东1, 张光鑫1, 葸金山1, 梁银池1, 赵丰云1, 郁松林1, 王小非2,*(
), 于坤1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-04-02
修回日期:2025-10-13
出版日期:2025-12-25
发布日期:2025-12-20
通讯作者:
基金资助:
ZHANG Huanhuan1, LI Xujiao1, YAO Dongdong1, ZHANG Guangxin1, XI Jinshan1, LIANG Yinchi1, ZHAO Fengyun1, YU Songlin1, WANG Xiaofei2,*(
), YU Kun1,*(
)
Received:2025-04-02
Revised:2025-10-13
Published:2025-12-25
Online:2025-12-20
摘要:
以新疆野苹果[Malus sieversii(Ledeb.)Roem.]为砧木,分别嫁接新疆野苹果、‘寒富’(Malus × domestica Borkh.‘Hanfu’)和‘富士’(M. × domestica Borkh.‘Fuji’),设不施氮与施氮(0.2 g · kg-1土)处理,采用稳定同位素示踪和高通量测序技术,测定接穗的叶片组织结构、光合特性、碳氮含量和内生菌群落结构的变化特征,探究氮素调控对苹果接穗叶片生理及内生微生物协同适应性的影响机制。结果表明,不施氮条件下‘富士’的叶片厚度、叶绿素含量和碳氮比均显著高于‘寒富’和新疆野苹果;施氮后‘寒富’的叶片净光合速率和气孔导度分别显著提高24.84%和73.86%,且其光合效率显著优于其他两种接穗。叶片内生菌群落分析表明,‘寒富’表现出最高的细菌和真菌群落多样性和丰富度,施氮处理进一步提升了其内生细菌群落的多样性指数(Chao1和Shannon指数分别增加7.30%和61.96%)和网络复杂性(节点数为598,链接数为75 728)。此外,施氮处理显著促进了‘寒富’叶片中功能有益菌属的富集,其中芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)、新鞘氨醇单胞菌属(Novosphingobium)和鞘氨醇单胞菌属(Sphingomonas)的相对丰度分别较不施氮处理显著提高了226.21%、59.35%和149.42%。综上,氮素施用可显著改善苹果接穗叶片的光合特性并优化内生菌群落结构,其中‘寒富’接穗在氮素充足条件下表现出更优的光合性能和更稳定的内生菌群落。
张换换, 李旭娇, 姚东东, 张光鑫, 葸金山, 梁银池, 赵丰云, 郁松林, 王小非, 于坤. 施氮对苹果接穗叶片光合和内生菌特性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(12): 3303-3321.
ZHANG Huanhuan, LI Xujiao, YAO Dongdong, ZHANG Guangxin, XI Jinshan, LIANG Yinchi, ZHAO Fengyun, YU Songlin, WANG Xiaofei, YU Kun. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Leaf Photosynthetic and Endophyte Characteristics of Apple Scions[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(12): 3303-3321.
图1 新疆野苹果嫁接不同接穗幼树13C和15N同位素标记示意图 CK:不施氮;AN:施氮。下同
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of 13C and 15N isotope labeling of young trees grafted with different scions on Malus sieversii CK:No nitrogen applied,AN:Nitrogen applied. The same below
图2 施氮对新疆野苹果不同接穗叶片解剖结构的影响 UEC:上表皮细胞;LEC:下表皮细胞;PP:栅栏组织,SP:海绵组织
Fig. 2 Effect of nitrogen application on leaf anatomy of different apple scions of Malus sieversii UEC:Upper epidermal cells;LEC:Lower epidermal cells;PP:Palisade parenchyma;SP:Spongy parenchyma
| 处理 Treatment | 叶片厚度/μm Leaf thickness | 上表皮厚度/μm Upper epidermal thickness | 下表皮厚度/μm Lower epidermal thickness | 栅栏组织厚度/μm Palisade parenchyma thickness | 海绵组织厚度/μm Spongy parenchyma thickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-CK | 136.50 ± 3.03 e | 11.07 ± 0.26 b | 9.43 ± 0.12 a | 45.57 ± 0.92 d | 63.20 ± 3.12 c |
| MS-AN | 169.43 ± 2.85 b | 9.87 ± 0.25 c | 9.10 ± 0.14 ab | 73.80 ± 3.91 bc | 74.17 ± 5.36 ab |
| HF-CK | 152.37 ± 3.08 d | 8.83 ± 0.19 d | 8.60 ± 0.14 b | 68.33 ± 0.85 c | 61.53 ± 1.07 c |
| HF-AN | 180.80 ± 3.89 a | 11.90 ± 0.22 a | 9.00 ± 0.24 ab | 82.50 ± 5.17 a | 73.70 ± 2.14 ab |
| FJ-CK | 162.00 ± 4.11 c | 11.63 ± 0.37 a | 8.87 ± 0.45 ab | 77.60 ± 2.68 ab | 66.73 ± 4.14 bc |
| FJ-AN | 175.39 ± 1.29 ab | 11.67 ± 0.17 a | 7.97 ± 0.31 c | 76.03 ± 4.29 abc | 77.30 ± 2.08 a |
| F值 F-value | |||||
| 接穗Scion (S) | 29.518*** | 32.371*** | 10.522** | 31.399*** | 1.927 |
| 氮素Nitrogen (N) | 187.173*** | 19.112*** | 3.360 | 48.204*** | 34.611*** |
| S × N | 9.763** | 76.571*** | 6.167* | 19.275*** | 0.063 |
表 1 施氮对不同苹果接穗叶片解剖结构特征的影响
Table 1 Effect of nitrogen application on leaf anatomical and structural characteristics of different apple scions
| 处理 Treatment | 叶片厚度/μm Leaf thickness | 上表皮厚度/μm Upper epidermal thickness | 下表皮厚度/μm Lower epidermal thickness | 栅栏组织厚度/μm Palisade parenchyma thickness | 海绵组织厚度/μm Spongy parenchyma thickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-CK | 136.50 ± 3.03 e | 11.07 ± 0.26 b | 9.43 ± 0.12 a | 45.57 ± 0.92 d | 63.20 ± 3.12 c |
| MS-AN | 169.43 ± 2.85 b | 9.87 ± 0.25 c | 9.10 ± 0.14 ab | 73.80 ± 3.91 bc | 74.17 ± 5.36 ab |
| HF-CK | 152.37 ± 3.08 d | 8.83 ± 0.19 d | 8.60 ± 0.14 b | 68.33 ± 0.85 c | 61.53 ± 1.07 c |
| HF-AN | 180.80 ± 3.89 a | 11.90 ± 0.22 a | 9.00 ± 0.24 ab | 82.50 ± 5.17 a | 73.70 ± 2.14 ab |
| FJ-CK | 162.00 ± 4.11 c | 11.63 ± 0.37 a | 8.87 ± 0.45 ab | 77.60 ± 2.68 ab | 66.73 ± 4.14 bc |
| FJ-AN | 175.39 ± 1.29 ab | 11.67 ± 0.17 a | 7.97 ± 0.31 c | 76.03 ± 4.29 abc | 77.30 ± 2.08 a |
| F值 F-value | |||||
| 接穗Scion (S) | 29.518*** | 32.371*** | 10.522** | 31.399*** | 1.927 |
| 氮素Nitrogen (N) | 187.173*** | 19.112*** | 3.360 | 48.204*** | 34.611*** |
| S × N | 9.763** | 76.571*** | 6.167* | 19.275*** | 0.063 |
图3 施氮对不同苹果接穗叶片色素含量的影响 MS:新疆野苹果;HF:寒富;FJ:富士;CK:不施氮;AN:施氮。不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05),下同
Fig. 3 Effect of nitrogen application on leaf pigment content of different apple scions MS:Malus sievesii;HF:Hanfu;FJ:Fuji;CK:No nitrogen applied;AN:Nitrogen applied. Different lowercase letters on the same day in the figure indicate significant differences between treatments(P < 0.05). The same below
图5 施氮对不同苹果接穗叶片碳和氮含量的影响 S:接穗,N:氮素。*、**和***分别表示在P < 0.05、0.01和0.001水平差异显著;ns表示无显著差异。下同
Fig. 5 Effect of nitrogen application on leaf carbon and nitrogen content of different apple scions S:Scion,N:Nitrogen. *,** and *** indicate significant differences at P < 0.05,0.01 and 0.001 levels,respectively;ns indicates no significant difference. The same below
图8 施氮对不同苹果接穗叶片内生细菌和真菌共现网络的影响
Fig. 8 Effect of nitrogen application on leaf endophytic bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks in different apple scions
| 微生物组 Microbiome | 处理 Treatment | 节点数 Total nodes | 链接数 Total links | 平均度 Average degree | 密度 Density | 正相关/% Positive | 负相关/% Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 细菌 Bacteria | MS-CK | 182 | 4 270 | 46.92 | 0.259 | 98.67 | 1.33 |
| MS-AN | 427 | 24 398 | 114.28 | 0.268 | 98.88 | 1.12 | |
| HF-CK | 367 | 16 922 | 92.22 | 0.252 | 98.78 | 1.22 | |
| HF-AN | 598 | 75 728 | 253.27 | 0.424 | 99.75 | 0.25 | |
| FJ-CK | 236 | 6 831 | 57.89 | 0.246 | 94.38 | 5.62 | |
| FJ-AN | 114 | 1 532 | 26.88 | 0.238 | 97.58 | 2.42 | |
| 真菌 Fungi | MS-CK | 78 | 695 | 17.82 | 0.231 | 90.94 | 9.06 |
| MS-AN | 88 | 703 | 15.98 | 0.184 | 87.48 | 12.52 | |
| HF-CK | 109 | 1 437 | 26.37 | 0.244 | 97.70 | 2.30 | |
| HF-AN | 73 | 955 | 26.16 | 0.363 | 95.81 | 4.19 | |
| FJ-CK | 82 | 822 | 20.05 | 0.248 | 97.20 | 2.80 | |
| FJ-AN | 47 | 194 | 8.26 | 0.179 | 80.41 | 19.59 |
表 2 施氮对不同苹果接穗叶片内生细菌和真菌群落网络拓扑结构的影响
Table 2 Effect of nitrogen application on the network topology of leaf endophytic bacterial and fungal communities of different apple scions
| 微生物组 Microbiome | 处理 Treatment | 节点数 Total nodes | 链接数 Total links | 平均度 Average degree | 密度 Density | 正相关/% Positive | 负相关/% Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 细菌 Bacteria | MS-CK | 182 | 4 270 | 46.92 | 0.259 | 98.67 | 1.33 |
| MS-AN | 427 | 24 398 | 114.28 | 0.268 | 98.88 | 1.12 | |
| HF-CK | 367 | 16 922 | 92.22 | 0.252 | 98.78 | 1.22 | |
| HF-AN | 598 | 75 728 | 253.27 | 0.424 | 99.75 | 0.25 | |
| FJ-CK | 236 | 6 831 | 57.89 | 0.246 | 94.38 | 5.62 | |
| FJ-AN | 114 | 1 532 | 26.88 | 0.238 | 97.58 | 2.42 | |
| 真菌 Fungi | MS-CK | 78 | 695 | 17.82 | 0.231 | 90.94 | 9.06 |
| MS-AN | 88 | 703 | 15.98 | 0.184 | 87.48 | 12.52 | |
| HF-CK | 109 | 1 437 | 26.37 | 0.244 | 97.70 | 2.30 | |
| HF-AN | 73 | 955 | 26.16 | 0.363 | 95.81 | 4.19 | |
| FJ-CK | 82 | 822 | 20.05 | 0.248 | 97.20 | 2.80 | |
| FJ-AN | 47 | 194 | 8.26 | 0.179 | 80.41 | 19.59 |
图9 叶片生理特性与内生细菌和真菌群落多样性和组成之间相关性 LT:叶片厚度,PPT:栅栏组织厚度,SPT:海绵组织厚度,Car:类胡萝卜素含量,Chl:叶绿素含量,Pn:净光合速率,Gs:气孔导度,CC:碳含量,NC:氮含量,C/N:碳氮比,13CC:13C含量,15NC:15N含量,13C/15N:13C/15N。叶片生理特性间用皮尔逊(Pearson)相关性分析;*、**和**分别表示在0.05、0.01和0.001水平显著相关。叶片生理因子与内生细菌和真菌群落多样性和组成用曼特尔(Mantel)相关分析
Fig. 9 Correlation analysis between leaf physiological properties and the diversity and composition of endophytic bacterial and fungal communities LT is leaf thickness,PPT is the palisade parenchyma thickness,SPT is the spongy parenchyma thickness thickness,Car is the carotenoid content,Chl is the chlorophyll content,Pn is the net photosynthetic rate,Gs is the stomatal conductance,CC is the carbon content,NC is the nitrogen content,C/N is the carbon to nitrogen ratio,13CC is the 13C content,15NC is the 15N content,and 13C/15N is the 13C to 15N ratio. Pearson correlation analysis was performed among leaf physiological traits;*,** and *** indicates significant correlation at the 0.05,0.01 and 0.001 levels,respectively. Mantel correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between leaf physiological factors and the diversity and composition of endophytic bacterial and fungal communities
图10 叶片生理特性与内生细菌和真菌群落特征之间斯皮尔曼相关性分析 LT:叶片厚度,PPT:栅栏组织厚度,SPT:海绵组织厚度,Car:类胡萝卜素含量,Chl:叶绿素含量,Pn:净光合速率,Gs:气孔导度,CC:碳含量,NC:氮含量,C/N:碳氮比,13CC:13C含量,15NC:15N含量,13C/15N:13C/15N。*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平显著相关
Fig. 10 Sperman correlation analysis between leaf physiological properties and endophytic bacterial and fungal communities characteristics LT is leaf thickness,PPT is the palisade parenchyma thickness,SPT is the spongy parenchyma thickness thickness,Car is the carotenoid content,Chl is the chlorophyll content,Pn is the net photosynthetic rate,Gs is the stomatal conductance,CC is the carbon content,NC is the nitrogen content,C/N is the carbon to nitrogen ratio,13CC is the 13C content,15NC is the 15N content,and 13C/15N is the 13C to 15N ratio. * and ** indicates significant correlation at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels,respectively
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
|
陈敏, 吴天利, 吕远达, 姜波, 闫化学, 李娟, 钟云. 2023. 不同砧木红江橙容器栽培生长和果实品质分析. 园艺学报, 50(7):1547-1562.
|
|
| [8] |
|
|
陈学森, 王楠, 彭福田, 毛志泉, 尹承苗, 姜远茂, 葛顺峰, 胡大刚, 李媛媛, 杜远鹏, 姚玉新, 张宗营. 2024. 中国重要落叶果树果实品质和熟期育种研究进展. 园艺学报, 51(1):8-26.
|
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
|
冯琛, 黄学旺, 李兴亮, 周佳, 李天红. 2022. 不同苹果矮化砧穗组合的抗旱性比较研究. 园艺学报, 49(5):945-957.
|
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
|
焦荟颖, 刘立强, 杨佳鑫, 秦伟, 王睿哲. 2024. 新疆野苹果自然种群根际固氮菌、解磷菌及解钾菌对叶片养分和生理指标的影响. 植物生态学报, 48(7):930-942.
|
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
|
李旭娇, 吕齐, 姚东东, 赵丰云, 王小非, 于坤. 2024. ‘烟富3’苹果不同砧木嫁接对其15N-尿素吸收利用的影响. 园艺学报, 51(8):1868-1880.
|
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
|
韦建明, 李云洲, 梁燕. 2023. 嫁接技术提高番茄抗病抗逆性的研究进展. 园艺学报, 50(9):1997-2014.
|
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
|
闫文渊, 秦军红, 段绍光, 徐建飞, 简银巧, 金黎平, 李广存. 2022. 水氮耦合对马铃薯光合特性、块茎形成和品质的影响. 园艺学报, 49(7):1491-1504.
|
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
|
张春雨, 陈学森, 林群, 苑兆和, 张红, 张小燕, 刘崇祺, 吴传金. 2019. 新疆野苹果群体遗传结构和遗传多样性的SRAP分析. 园艺学报, 36(1):7-14.
|
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [1] | 杜宜南, 冀志蕊, 丛佳林, 周宗山. 早熟苹果新品种‘华御1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 1-2. |
| [2] | 杜宜南, 丛佳林, 冀志蕊, 周宗山. 中熟苹果新品种‘华阳’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 3-4. |
| [3] | 朱钰, 刘肖烽, 周佳, 李静, 王强. 苹果新品种‘华优贝红’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 5-6. |
| [4] | 韩晓蕾, 马松亚, 康立群, 张彩霞. 苹果新品种‘中苹早红4号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 7-8. |
| [5] | 马松亚, 张彩霞, 韩晓蕾, 田玉凤, 康立群. 优质小果型苹果‘苹优3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 9-10. |
| [6] | 马松亚, 张彩霞, 韩晓蕾, 杨安, 康立群. 小果型苹果新品种‘苹优4号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S2): 11-12. |
| [7] | 张宗营, 王 平, 王 楠, 马明德, 刘文军, 邹 琦, 徐月华, 陈晓流, 毛志泉, 陈学森. 苹果紫红色芽变新品种‘八仙新富’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S1): 1-2. |
| [8] | 朱 钰, 刘肖烽, 周 佳, 李 静, 王 强. 苹果新品种‘华优宝丰’[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(S1): 3-4. |
| [9] | 杜丽君, 刘英材, 史妍妍, 汪洋, 李春晖, 何银涛, 王旭, 边传杰, 张满让. 丛枝菌根真菌对苹果品种耐盐碱的影响及缓解机理[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(9): 2410-2424. |
| [10] | 徐功勋, 闫帅, 何美琦, 马怀宇, 吕德国, 秦嗣军, 程存刚, 赵德英. 苹果抗寒性研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(8): 2021-2045. |
| [11] | 陈学森, 王楠, 张宗营, 张淑辉, 刘文军, 邹琦, 于蕾, 张静, 姜远茂, 胡大刚, 李媛媛, 毛志泉. 富营养强风味轻简化宜机化苹果育种研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(6): 1661-1676. |
| [12] | 田玉凤, 马松亚, 杨安, 韩晓蕾, 张彩霞. 苹果砧木B9再生体系的建立与优化[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(4): 947-958. |
| [13] | 程小改, 万源, 林琭, 谢鹏, 李志强, 李谧, 王鹏鹏, 牛自勉. 苹果开心树形树干高度对不同冠层部位叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(3): 671-692. |
| [14] | 李敖, 郑旭, 吴承勖, 聂瑞宁, 姬新颖, 唐佳莉, 张俊佩. 丛枝菌根真菌对盐胁迫下核桃幼苗生长及生理的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(2): 423-438. |
| [15] | 孙文静, 李小艳, 张静允, 周辉, 黄小军, 马锋旺, 龚小庆. 苹果肌醇-1-磷酸合成酶基因MdMIPS1参与高温胁迫应答的功能分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2025, 52(12): 3143-3156. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司