Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1644-1660.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0368
• Cultivation?Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Xiaodan1, KONG Xiangfeng1, GAO Li2, GONG Tiangeng1, PIAO Meiling1, YU Pengcheng1, and JIA Guixia1,*()
Received:
2024-09-01
Revised:
2025-02-22
Online:
2025-06-20
Published:
2025-06-20
Contact:
and JIA Guixia
WU Xiaodan, KONG Xiangfeng, GAO Li, GONG Tiangeng, PIAO Meiling, YU Pengcheng, and JIA Guixia. Study on Influencing Factor of Bulblet Enlargement in vitro of Asiatic Lily[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(6): 1644-1660.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0368
基因名称 Gene name | 正向引物(5′-3′) Forward primer sequence | 反向引物(5′-3′) Reverse primer sequence |
---|---|---|
SSS(CL7226_C1) | AATGGTTGGAGGTGGAAATCT | GGCCTCCTTCGGAACATAAA |
SSS2(CL3977_C2) | CACTGGTGGCCTTAGAGATAC | CCAGCATACTCTCCTTCGATAAA |
SWEET14(CL255_C3) | TGACTCTTCTTGGTTGGATCTG | GGCATGAACTCGACACTCTT |
SWEET15(CL7570_C1) | GGGTTCCAATCTCTTCCCTATG | TCCGATCGAGTTAATGGTGATG |
Actin(内参基因 Reference gene) | CCCATTGAGCACGGCATTGTC | GGATTGAGAGGAGCTTCGGTGAGA |
Table 1 Primers used for Real-time quantitative PCR analysis
基因名称 Gene name | 正向引物(5′-3′) Forward primer sequence | 反向引物(5′-3′) Reverse primer sequence |
---|---|---|
SSS(CL7226_C1) | AATGGTTGGAGGTGGAAATCT | GGCCTCCTTCGGAACATAAA |
SSS2(CL3977_C2) | CACTGGTGGCCTTAGAGATAC | CCAGCATACTCTCCTTCGATAAA |
SWEET14(CL255_C3) | TGACTCTTCTTGGTTGGATCTG | GGCATGAACTCGACACTCTT |
SWEET15(CL7570_C1) | GGGTTCCAATCTCTTCCCTATG | TCCGATCGAGTTAATGGTGATG |
Actin(内参基因 Reference gene) | CCCATTGAGCACGGCATTGTC | GGATTGAGAGGAGCTTCGGTGAGA |
处理 Treatment | 生长调节剂/(mg · L-1) Growth regulator | 甜心 Tianxin | 小海星 Xiaohaixing | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA | NAA | 6-BA/ NAA | 出芽时 间/d Budding time | 诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | 出芽时间/d Budding time | 诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | |
1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 5.0 | 8 ~ 24 | 1.00 ± 0 a | 2.44 ± 0.25 abc | 13 ~ 30 | 0.90 ± 0.11 ab | 1.92 ± 0.29 a |
2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 8 ~ 24 | 0.90 ± 0.09 ab | 2.78 ± 0.69 a | 13 ~ 30 | 0.89 ± 0.01 ab | 2.03 ± 0.18 a |
3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 14 ~ 30 | 0.82 ± 0.08 abc | 2.14 ± 0.29 abcd | 24 ~ 45 | 0.37 ± 0.10 de | 1.25 ± 0.45 bcd |
4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 10.0 | 14 ~ 30 | 0.96 ± 0.06 a | 2.52 ± 0.63 ab | 18 ~ 35 | 0.84 ± 0.05 abc | 2.01 ± 0.16 a |
5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 5.0 | 14 ~ 30 | 0.89 ± 0.12 ab | 2.12 ± 0.51 abcd | 18 ~ 35 | 0.83 ± 0.13 abc | 1.72 ± 0.54 ab |
6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 20 ~ 35 | 0.74 ± 0.18 bcd | 1.55 ± 0.16 d | 30 ~ 55 | 0.25 ± 0.15 ef | 1.22 ± 0.40 bcd |
7 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 15.0 | 18 ~ 35 | 0.92 ± 0.07 ab | 2.73 ± 0.25 a | 24 ~ 45 | 0.92 ± 0.06 a | 1.81 ± 0.45 ab |
8 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 7.5 | 18 ~ 35 | 0.89 ± 0.09 ab | 2.09 ± 0.19 abcd | 24 ~ 45 | 0.75 ± 0.13 bc | 1.94 ± 0.65 a |
9 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.63 ± 0.07 d | 1.60 ± 0.40 d | 30 ~ 50 | 0.19 ± 0.17 fg | 1.01 ± 0.58 cd |
10 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 20.0 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.83 ± 0.16 abc | 2.46 ± 0.64 abc | 24 ~ 45 | 0.71 ± 0.14 c | 1.64 ± 0.38 abc |
11 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 10.0 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.74 ± 0.12 bcd | 1.82 ± 0.17 cd | 24 ~ 45 | 0.47 ± 0.04 d | 1.55 ± 0.41 abc |
12 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.66 ± 0.22 cd | 1.89 ± 0.32 bcd | 40 ~ 65 | 0.08 ± 0.06 g | 0.67 ± 0.52 d |
Table 2 Effects of NAA and 6-BA on scale-induced culture of‘Tianxin’and‘Xiaohaixing’lilies
处理 Treatment | 生长调节剂/(mg · L-1) Growth regulator | 甜心 Tianxin | 小海星 Xiaohaixing | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-BA | NAA | 6-BA/ NAA | 出芽时 间/d Budding time | 诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | 出芽时间/d Budding time | 诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | |
1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 5.0 | 8 ~ 24 | 1.00 ± 0 a | 2.44 ± 0.25 abc | 13 ~ 30 | 0.90 ± 0.11 ab | 1.92 ± 0.29 a |
2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 8 ~ 24 | 0.90 ± 0.09 ab | 2.78 ± 0.69 a | 13 ~ 30 | 0.89 ± 0.01 ab | 2.03 ± 0.18 a |
3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 14 ~ 30 | 0.82 ± 0.08 abc | 2.14 ± 0.29 abcd | 24 ~ 45 | 0.37 ± 0.10 de | 1.25 ± 0.45 bcd |
4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 10.0 | 14 ~ 30 | 0.96 ± 0.06 a | 2.52 ± 0.63 ab | 18 ~ 35 | 0.84 ± 0.05 abc | 2.01 ± 0.16 a |
5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 5.0 | 14 ~ 30 | 0.89 ± 0.12 ab | 2.12 ± 0.51 abcd | 18 ~ 35 | 0.83 ± 0.13 abc | 1.72 ± 0.54 ab |
6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 20 ~ 35 | 0.74 ± 0.18 bcd | 1.55 ± 0.16 d | 30 ~ 55 | 0.25 ± 0.15 ef | 1.22 ± 0.40 bcd |
7 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 15.0 | 18 ~ 35 | 0.92 ± 0.07 ab | 2.73 ± 0.25 a | 24 ~ 45 | 0.92 ± 0.06 a | 1.81 ± 0.45 ab |
8 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 7.5 | 18 ~ 35 | 0.89 ± 0.09 ab | 2.09 ± 0.19 abcd | 24 ~ 45 | 0.75 ± 0.13 bc | 1.94 ± 0.65 a |
9 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.63 ± 0.07 d | 1.60 ± 0.40 d | 30 ~ 50 | 0.19 ± 0.17 fg | 1.01 ± 0.58 cd |
10 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 20.0 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.83 ± 0.16 abc | 2.46 ± 0.64 abc | 24 ~ 45 | 0.71 ± 0.14 c | 1.64 ± 0.38 abc |
11 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 10.0 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.74 ± 0.12 bcd | 1.82 ± 0.17 cd | 24 ~ 45 | 0.47 ± 0.04 d | 1.55 ± 0.41 abc |
12 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 24 ~ 45 | 0.66 ± 0.22 cd | 1.89 ± 0.32 bcd | 40 ~ 65 | 0.08 ± 0.06 g | 0.67 ± 0.52 d |
因子Factor | 平方和SS | 自由度df | 均方MS | F | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甜心 Tianxin | 6-BA | 1.301 | 3 | 0.434 | 2.413 | 0.081 |
NAA | 4.832 | 2 | 2.416 | 13.443 | 0.000** | |
6-BA × NAA | 1.774 | 6 | 0.296 | 1.645 | 0.161 | |
误差Error | 7.009 | 39 | 0.180 | |||
总计Total | 254.532 | 51 | ||||
小海星Xiaohaixing | 6-BA | 1.709 | 3 | 0.570 | 2.774 | 0.051 |
NAA | 8.709 | 2 | 4.354 | 21.204 | 0.000** | |
6-BA × NAA | 0.456 | 6 | 0.076 | 0.370 | 0.894 | |
误差Error | 9.857 | 48 | 0.205 | |||
总计Total | 158.494 | 60 |
Table 3 Analysis of variance of NAA and 6-BA on adventitious bud differentiation of‘Tianxin’and‘Xiaohaixing’lilies
因子Factor | 平方和SS | 自由度df | 均方MS | F | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甜心 Tianxin | 6-BA | 1.301 | 3 | 0.434 | 2.413 | 0.081 |
NAA | 4.832 | 2 | 2.416 | 13.443 | 0.000** | |
6-BA × NAA | 1.774 | 6 | 0.296 | 1.645 | 0.161 | |
误差Error | 7.009 | 39 | 0.180 | |||
总计Total | 254.532 | 51 | ||||
小海星Xiaohaixing | 6-BA | 1.709 | 3 | 0.570 | 2.774 | 0.051 |
NAA | 8.709 | 2 | 4.354 | 21.204 | 0.000** | |
6-BA × NAA | 0.456 | 6 | 0.076 | 0.370 | 0.894 | |
误差Error | 9.857 | 48 | 0.205 | |||
总计Total | 158.494 | 60 |
草甘膦/mg · L-1 Glyphosate | ‘甜心’‘Tianxin’ | ‘小海星’‘Xiaohaixing’ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | 诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | |
0(对照 Control) | 0.89 ± 0 ab | 2.26 ± 0.39 ab | 0.89 ± 0.11 ab | 2.59 ± 0.82 |
1.0 | 0.93 ± 0.13 a | 2.70 ± 0.93 a | 0.96 ± 0.06 a | 3.56 ± 1.34 |
2.0 | 0.71 ± 0.06 bc | 1.44 ± 0.12 b | 0.78 ± 0.11 ab | 2.51 ± 0.56 |
3.0 | 0.56 ± 0.12 c | 1.30 ± 0.50 b | 0.74 ± 0.06 b | 2.33 ± 0.51 |
Table 4 Effect of glyphosate on the scale induction culture of‘Tianxin’and‘Xiaohaixing’lilies
草甘膦/mg · L-1 Glyphosate | ‘甜心’‘Tianxin’ | ‘小海星’‘Xiaohaixing’ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | 诱导率 Inductivity | 分化系数 Coefficient of differentiation | |
0(对照 Control) | 0.89 ± 0 ab | 2.26 ± 0.39 ab | 0.89 ± 0.11 ab | 2.59 ± 0.82 |
1.0 | 0.93 ± 0.13 a | 2.70 ± 0.93 a | 0.96 ± 0.06 a | 3.56 ± 1.34 |
2.0 | 0.71 ± 0.06 bc | 1.44 ± 0.12 b | 0.78 ± 0.11 ab | 2.51 ± 0.56 |
3.0 | 0.56 ± 0.12 c | 1.30 ± 0.50 b | 0.74 ± 0.06 b | 2.33 ± 0.51 |
Fig. 2 The bulblet enlargement coefficient and the number of new bulblets added of‘Tianxin’and‘Xiaohaixing’lilies with different concentrations of SA in vitro Different lowercase letters of the same cultivar indicate significant differences among treatments(P < 0.05). The same below
Fig. 4 Effects of different concentrations of PP333 and 2,4-EBR on bulblet enlargement coefficient and the number of new bulblets added of ‘Tianxin’and‘Xiaohaixing’lilies in vitro
Fig. 5 The change of bulblet enlargement coefficient of tissue culture bulblet under Growth status of small bulblets 1-9 are the test group codes,as shown in table 5
处理 Treatments | NAA/(mg · L-1) | 蔗糖/(g · L-1) Sucrose | AC/(g · L-1) | 6-BA/(mg · L-1) | 膨大系数Expansion coefficient | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甜心Tianxin | 小海星Xiaohaixing | |||||
1 | 0.1 | 30 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.67 ± 0.73 de | 3.05 ± 1.26 de |
2 | 0.1 | 60 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 4.16 ± 1.34 a | 4.12 ± 1.47 abc |
3 | 0.1 | 90 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.27 ± 1.54 bcd | 3.85 ± 0.91 abcd |
4 | 0.5 | 30 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.40 ± 0.60 e | 2.95 ± 0.78 e |
5 | 0.5 | 60 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 3.63 ± 1.24 abc | 4.25 ± 1.28 abc |
6 | 0.5 | 90 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.91 ± 1.64 ab | 3.55 ± 0.69 bcde |
7 | 1.0 | 30 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 2.96 ± 0.79 cde | 4.35 ± 1.17 ab |
8 | 1.0 | 60 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.79 ± 0.91 de | 3.43 ± 0.88 cde |
9 | 1.0 | 90 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 3.13 ± 1.11 bcde | 4.43 ± 1.65 a |
Table 5 Orthogonal test of bulblet expansion in vitro
处理 Treatments | NAA/(mg · L-1) | 蔗糖/(g · L-1) Sucrose | AC/(g · L-1) | 6-BA/(mg · L-1) | 膨大系数Expansion coefficient | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甜心Tianxin | 小海星Xiaohaixing | |||||
1 | 0.1 | 30 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.67 ± 0.73 de | 3.05 ± 1.26 de |
2 | 0.1 | 60 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 4.16 ± 1.34 a | 4.12 ± 1.47 abc |
3 | 0.1 | 90 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.27 ± 1.54 bcd | 3.85 ± 0.91 abcd |
4 | 0.5 | 30 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.40 ± 0.60 e | 2.95 ± 0.78 e |
5 | 0.5 | 60 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 3.63 ± 1.24 abc | 4.25 ± 1.28 abc |
6 | 0.5 | 90 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.91 ± 1.64 ab | 3.55 ± 0.69 bcde |
7 | 1.0 | 30 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 2.96 ± 0.79 cde | 4.35 ± 1.17 ab |
8 | 1.0 | 60 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.79 ± 0.91 de | 3.43 ± 0.88 cde |
9 | 1.0 | 90 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 3.13 ± 1.11 bcde | 4.43 ± 1.65 a |
Fig. 6 The changes of bulblet enlargement coefficient for‘Tianxin’and‘Xiaohaixing’lilies with different basic medium Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different culture medium treatments(P < 0.05)
Fig. 9 Histological observation of squamosal transsection and slitting cells PC:Parenchyma cell;EC:Epidermal cells;VB:Vascular bundle tissue;SG:Starch granules
Fig. 10 Relative expression levels of SSS and SSS2 in vitro scales and leaves of‘Tianxin’lilies at different developmental stages The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments at different developmental times of the same gene(P < 0.05),the same below
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
陈姝男. 2018. 宝兴百合组织培养和试管鳞茎膨大研究[硕士论文]. 雅安: 四川农业大学.
|
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
仇硕, 唐凤鸾, 夏科, 李秀娟, 赵志国, 蒋庆鸿, 赵健. 2017. 龙牙百合增殖培养及鳞茎生长发育研究. 广东农业科学, 44 (4): 61-66.
|
|
[5] |
|
代玥, 刘林娅, 杨那, 向文丽, 周园, 黄亚成. 2021. 植物中SWEET蛋白的研究进展. 分子植物育种, 19 (4):1128-1135.
|
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
黄子洋, 刘洁, 康婕, 任梓铭, 崔祺, 李东泽, 夏宜平, 马斯, 吴昀. 2024. 观赏植物糖转运蛋白研究进展. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 50 (1):12-24.
|
|
[9] |
|
回振龙, 王蒂, 李宗国, 李朝周, 李旭鹏, 张俊莲. 2014. 外源水杨酸对连作马铃薯生长发育及抗性生理的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 32 (4):1-8.
|
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0909 |
李玉静, 冯雨晴, 赵园园, 史宏志. 2023. 不同形态氮素吸收利用及其对植物生理代谢影响的综述. 中国农业科技导报, 25 (2):128-139.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0909 |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
刘艳菊, 朱永官, 丁辉, 童依平. 2004. 不同氮肥水平下SPAD读数与菠菜硝态氮含量关系的初步研究. 农业环境科学学报,(3):484-487.
|
|
[15] |
|
吕翠竹, 王有国, 王立. 2020. 绿花百合组培芽增殖与试管鳞茎膨大的影响因素研究. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 40 (1):38-45.
|
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00756-2 pmid: 32917974 |
[18] |
|
闵芮涵, 吴昀, 李世琦, 夏宜平.孙敏译, 2020. 离体百合鳞茎发育及淀粉合成酶基因LohGBSSI的克隆与表达. 浙江农林大学学报, 37 (2):201-208.
|
|
[19] |
|
牛慧婷, 杨道兰, 冯炜弘, 尹燕, 李爱兵, 王璐, 何潇. 2022. 不同因子对兰州百合组培小鳞茎诱导及膨大的影响研究. 甘肃农业科技, 53 (6):66-71.
|
|
[20] |
|
祁先宇, 张文亮, 杨盼盼, 徐雷锋, 明军. 2022. 赏食兼用百合京鹤高效组培再生体系的优化. 中国蔬菜,(8):57-62.
|
|
[21] |
|
秦新惠, 崔兴林, 陈学红, 刘芬, 伊万伟. 2015. 不同因子对兰州百合组培小鳞茎膨大的影响研究. 林业科技通讯,(12): 44-47.
|
|
[22] |
|
沈宁东, 韦梅琴. 2008. 水杨酸在观赏百合试管培养中对鳞茎形成的影响. 青海师范大学学报(自然科学版),(2):76-77.
|
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
苏頔, 方正, 李英丽, 赵斌. 2012. 不同氮素形态配比对百合生长发育的影响. 北方园艺,(2):67-69.
|
|
[25] |
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.09.1855 |
唐鑫华, 曲自成, 张浩, 魏峭嵘, 张丽莉, 石瑛. 2018. 块茎形成期外施表油菜素内酯对马铃薯生理和产量的影响. 核农学报, 32 (9):1855-1863.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.09.1855 |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
王立冬, 梁海燕, 王燕茹, 全小强, 李小玉, 闫小莉. 2023. 不同氮素形态与配比对杉木和木荷幼苗光合特性及生长的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 41 (2):217-224.
|
|
[28] |
|
王晓丽, 韩立群, 刘杰, 董凤丽. 2011. 活性炭和多效唑对垂花百合试管鳞茎膨大的影响. 安徽农业科学, 39 (19):11429-11430.
|
|
[29] |
|
吴银亮, 王红霞, 杨俊, 范维娟, 杨楠, 殷旻昊, 张鹏. 2017. 甘薯储藏根形成及其调控机制研究进展. 植物生理学报, 53 (5):749-757.
|
|
[30] |
|
吴昀. 2016. 基于离体模式体系的百合小鳞茎发生发育机制研究[博士论文]: 杭州: 浙江大学.
|
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
许俊旭, 李青竹, 李叶, 杨柳燕, 李心, 王桢, 张永春. 2020. 石蒜鳞茎膨大过程中内源激素相关基因的差异表达研究. 园艺学报, 47 (6):1126-1140.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0398 |
|
[35] |
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2250 |
许俊旭, 李青竹, 李叶, 杨柳燕, 张永春, 蔡友铭. 2021. 石蒜鳞茎膨大过程中碳水化合物代谢相关基因的差异表达研究. 核农学报, 35 (10):2250-2257.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.10.2250 |
|
[36] |
|
尹燕, 杨道兰, 梁玉文, 冯炜弘, 牛慧婷, 李爱兵. 2023. 氮素形态对兰州百合试管鳞茎生长及膨大的影响. 甘肃科技纵横, 52 (3):7-10.
|
|
[37] |
|
臧玉文, 蒋芳玲, 程雅琪, 孔祥宇, 吴震. 2016. 红香芋试管球茎膨大过程中主要碳水化合物含量以及淀粉合成相关酶活性的动态研究. 西北植物学报, 36 (4):700-705.
|
|
[38] |
|
张洁, 蔡宣梅, 林真, 郭文杰, 方少忠. 2010. 百合试管鳞茎诱导及膨大技术的研究. 福建农业学报, 25 (3):328-331.
|
|
[39] |
|
张进忠. 2018. 百合鳞茎离体发育及淀粉合成相关酶研究[博士论文]. 广州: 华南农业大学.
|
|
[40] |
|
张进忠, 孙嘉曼, 李朝生, 韦莉萍, 范燕萍. 2019. 百合鳞茎发育过程中淀粉合成相关酶基因的克隆及表达分析. 广西植物, 39 (4):446-452.
|
|
[41] |
|
张计育, 王刚, 王涛, 贾展慧, 宣继萍. 2023. SWEET蛋白在植物生长发育中的功能作用研究进展. 植物资源与环境学报, 32 (5): 1-15.
|
|
[42] |
|
张琳. 2018. 百合小鳞茎从头再生的组织学和转录组学研究[博士论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学.
|
|
[43] |
|
张敏慧, 陈俊吉, 全伟, 谷志佳, 吴红芝. 2024. 玫红百合组培小鳞茎瓶内膨大影响因子的研究. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 50 (1):42-52.
|
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
张彦妮, 李兆婷, 张艳波, 汪海洋. 2016. 毛百合试管鳞茎形成和膨大的培养优化. 江苏农业科学, 44 (4):74-78.
|
|
[46] |
|
赵家敏, 祁宏英, 李赟, 张佳美, 尹帮果. 2017. 亚洲百合试管鳞茎诱导. 黑龙江农业科学,(2):22-25.
|
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.10.002 |
郑乾明, 王小柯, 王红林, 解璞, 付慧敏, 陈传武. 2023. 甜橙糖转运蛋白CitSWEET15基因的表达分析与转运活性检测. 热带作物学报, 44 (10):1944-1951.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.10.002 |
|
[49] |
|
周玲云, 高素萍, 陈锋. 2016. 蔗糖和光周期在泸定百合试管鳞茎膨大中的作用机制. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 42 (4):435-441.
|
|
[50] |
|
周鹏, 彭福田, 魏绍冲, 彭勇. 2007. 氮素形态对平邑甜茶细胞分裂素水平和叶片生长的影响. 园艺学报, 34 (2):269-274.
|
[1] | LIU Guicai , DENG Sha, DONG Yunchang , LUO Weicomg , GAO Huanhuan , JIANG Liangwei , FANG Lin , LI Lin , WU Kunlin , and ZENG Songjun, . A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Hua Jin’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 131-132. |
[2] | GUO Manna, DENG Sha, FANG Lin , LI Lin , WU Kunlin , and ZENG Songjun, . A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Zhong Ke Xiang Fei’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 133-134. |
[3] | ZHANG Wanqing, ZHANG Hongxiao, LIAN Xiaofang, LI Yuying, GUO Lili, HOU Xiaogai. Analysis of DNA Methylation Related to Callus Differentiation and Rooting Induction of Paeonia ostii‘Fengdan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(8): 1735-1746. |
[4] | WANG Jing, XU Leifeng, WANG Ling, QI Xianyu, SONG Meng, CAO Yuwei, HE Guoren, TANG Yuchao, YANG Panpan, MING Jun. The Numerical Classification of Flower Color Phenotype in Lily [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(3): 571-580. |
[5] | ZHOU Huiming, MO Zhilong, CHEN Changming, LIN Huifeng. A New Cymbidium Cultivar‘Shayang Cuidie’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(12): 2767-2768. |
[6] | ZHANG Wenxin, CAO Xueying, ZHOU Shiming, ZHANG Bieyu, FANG Lin, LI Lin, WU Kunlin, and ZENG Songjun, . A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Shengyin 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(S2): 2909-2910. |
[7] | CAO Xueying, ZHANG Wenxin, ZHOU Jin, ZHOU Shiming, ZHANG Bieyu, FANG Lin, LI Lin, WU Kunlin, and ZENG Songjun, . A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Shengyin 4’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(S2): 2911-2912. |
[8] | GUAN Minhua, CAO Xueying, ZHANG Wenxin, YE Yuzhuang, FANG Lin, LI Lin, WU Kunlin, and ZENG Songjun, . A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Shengyin 5’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(S2): 2913-2914. |
[9] | DENG Yi, ZHANG Wenxin, CAO Xueying, FANG Lin, LI Lin, WU Kunlin, LIU Haitao, , and ZENG Songjun, . A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Shuangyan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(S2): 2915-2916. |
[10] | YU Pengcheng, TAN Pingyu, GAO Li, JIA Guixia. Analysis of the Development of Flower Color Based on Hybridization Breeding Process in Lilium OT Hybrids [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(10): 1885-1894. |
[11] | BI Mengmeng, CAO Yuwei, SONG Meng, TANG Yuchao, HE Guoren, YANG Yue, YANG Panpan, XU Leifeng, MING Jun. Advances in Flower Color Research of Lilium [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(10): 2073-2086. |
[12] | LIAO Xiaoshan, ZHOU Jun, RONG Duoyan, LIN Qindan, DENG Yawen, and ZHENG Sixiang, . A New Lilium Oriental Cultivar‘ChangErbenyue’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(S2): 3045-3046. |
[13] | YANG Xiaofang, ZHANG Zuying, MIAO Lixiang, ZHANG Yuchao, SHEN Lan, QIN Qiaoping, and JIANG Guihua, . Preliminary Analysis on the Molecular Differences of Fruit Colouring Between Yuexin Strawberry and Its Somaclonal Mutation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(10): 1999-2008. |
[14] | DENG Sha1,2,CAO Xueying3,4,ZHENG Feng1,ZHANG Wenxin3,4,ZHOU Shiming3,4,ZHANG Bieyu3,4,ZHANG Jinlong3,4,FANG Lin1,LI Lin1,WU Kunlin1,and ZENG Songjun1,5,*. A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Shengyin 1’ [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2019, 46(S2): 2865-2866. |
[15] | DENG Sha1,2,ZHANG Wenxin3,4,ZHENG Feng1,CAO Xueying3,4,ZHOU Shiming3,4,ZHANG Bieyu3,4,ZHANG Jinlong3,4,FANG Lin1,LI Lin1,WU Kunlin1,and ZENG Songjun1,5,*. A New Hippeastrum Cultivar‘Shengyin 2’ [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2019, 46(S2): 2867-2868. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd