Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 1020-1036.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0385
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, WANG Youping, CHANG Peipei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun*()
Received:
2024-07-07
Revised:
2025-03-17
Online:
2025-05-08
Published:
2025-04-25
Contact:
ZHANG Zikun
DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, WANG Youping, CHANG Peipei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Seed Germination of Watermelon Under Saline-Alkali Stress and Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(4): 1020-1036.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0385
指标Index | 盐碱液浓度/(mmol · L-1)Concentration of saline-alkali solution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(对照Control) | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
相对发芽势Relative germination energy(RGE) | 1.00 ± 0.09 ab | 0.88 ± 0.03 bcd | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 0.92 ± 0.03 abc | 0.85 ± 0.05 cd |
相对发芽率Relative germination rate(RGR) | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 1.01 ± 0.04 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 0.9 8± 0.00 ab |
相对发芽指数Relative germination index(RGI) | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.88 ± 0.02 c | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 0.98 ± 0.01 ab | 0.90 ± 0.01 bc |
相对活力指数Relative vigor index(RVI) | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.81 ± 0.01 b | 0.82 ± 0.05 b | 0.76 ± 0.07 b | 0.58 ± 0.02 c |
相对胚根长 Relative root length(RRL) | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.93 ± 0.02 a | 0.79 ± 0.03 b | 0.77 ± 0.06 b | 0.64 ± 0.03 c |
相对胚芽长 Relative shoot length(RSL) | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 0.88 ± 0.03 b | 0.72 ± 0.03 c | 0.67 ± 0.05 cd | 0.62 ± 0.01 de |
相对胚根鲜质量Relative root fresh weight(RRFW) | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.90 ± 0.06 ab | 0.80 ± 0.05 bc | 0.74 ± 0.003 cd | 0.67 ± 0.02 d |
相对胚芽鲜质量Relative shoot fresh weight(RSFW) | 1.00 ± 0.05 a | 0.70 ± 0.04 b | 0.58 ± 0.04 c | 0.47 ± 0.02 d | 0.45 ± 0.01 d |
相对胚根干质量Relative root dry weight(RRDW) | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 0.96 ± 0.03 ab | 0.95 ± 0.02 abc | 0.93 ± 0.03 abc | 0.90 ± 0.01 bc |
相对胚芽干质量Relative shoot dry weight(RSDW) | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 1.01 ± 0.01 a | 1.01 ± 0.04 a | 1.00 ± 0.05 a | 1.06 ± 0.04 a |
相对根总长度Relative total root length(RTRL) | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.87 ± 0.08 b | 0.86 ± 0.06 b | 0.79 ± 0.06 c | 0.64 ± 0.04 d |
相对根投影面积Relative root projected area(RRPA) | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.82 ± 0.05 b | 0.70 ± 0.02 c | 0.61 ± 0.04 d | 0.46 ± 0.03 e |
相对根表面积Relative root surface area(RRSA) | 1.00 ± 0.09 a | 0.79 ± 0.07 b | 0.77 ± 0.07 b | 0.74 ± 0.06 b | 0.52 ± 0.05 c |
相对根系平均直径Relative average root diameter(RARD) | 1.00 ± 0.17 b | 0.94 ± 0.16 bc | 0.89 ± 0.14 bcd | 0.83 ± 0.14 cd | 0.78 ± 0.13 d |
相对根体积 Relative root volume(RRV) | 1.00 ± 0.14 a | 0.71 ±0.12 b | 0.64 ± 0.04 c | 0.52 ± 0.04 d | 0.37 ± 0.03 e |
指标Index | 盐碱液浓度/(mmol · L-1)Concentration of saline-alkali solution | ||||
50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 100 | |
相对发芽势 Relative germination energy(RGE) | 0.77 ± 0.06 de | 0.77 ± 0.06 de | 0.68 ± 0.03 e | 0.12 ± 0.03 f | - |
相对发芽率Relative germination rate (RGR) | 0.94 ± 0.00 bc | 0.91 ± 0.02 c | 0.90 ± 0.00 c | 0.40 ± 0.02 d | 0.04 ± 0.00 e |
相对发芽指数Relative germination index(RGI) | 0.88 ± 0.04 c | 0.84 ± 0.03 cd | 0.76 ± 0.005 d | 0.22 ± 0.03 e | 0.01 ± 0.01 f |
相对活力指数Relative vigor index(RVI) | 0.56 ± 0.03 c | 0.42 ± 0.02 d | 0.32 ± 0.01 d | 0.02 ± 0.002 e | - |
相对胚根长 Relative root length(RRL) | 0.63 ± 0.01 c | 0.51 ± 0.01 d | 0.43 ± 0.01 e | 0.09 ± 0.01 f | - |
相对胚芽长 Relative shoot length(RSL) | 0.54 ± 0.05 ef | 0.52 ± 0.02 f | 0.45± 0.02 f | - | - |
相对胚根鲜质量Relative root fresh weight(RRFW) | 0.66 ± 0.03 d | 0.50 ± 0.03 e | 0.44 ± 0.02 e | 0.19 ± 0.004 f | - |
相对胚芽鲜质量Relative shoot fresh weight(RSFW) | 0.36 ± 0.002 e | 0.35 ± 0.02 e | 0.32 ± 0.01 ef | - | - |
相对胚根干质量Relative root dry weight(RRDW) | 0.88 ± 0.05 c | 0.71 ± 0.02 d | 0.67 ± 0.05 d | 0.22 ± 0.01 e | - |
相对胚芽干质量Relative shoot dry weight(RSDW) | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 1.02 ± 0.03 a | 1.06 ± 0.04 a | - | - |
相对根总长度Relative total root length(RTRL) | 0.34 ± 0.03 e | 0.16 ± 0.01 f | 0.13 ± 0.01 f | 0.03 ± 0.002 g | - |
相对根投影面积Relative root projected area(RRPA) | 0.24 ± 0.02 f | 0.12 ± 0.01 g | 0.11 ± 0.01 g | 0.04 ± 0.003 h | - |
相对根表面积Relative root surface area(RRSA) | 0.29 ± 0.01 d | 0.14 ± 0.01 e | 0.12 ± 0.01 e | 0.05 ± 0.001 f | - |
相对根系平均直径Relative average root diameter(RARD) | 0.85 ± 0.16 cd | 0.87 ± 0.14 bcd | 0.89 ± 0.16 bcd | 1.32 ± 0.11 a | - |
相对根体积 Relative root volume(RRV) | 0.21 ± 0.02 f | 0.14 ± 0.02 g | 0.10 ± 0.01 g | 0.08 ± 0.007 g | - |
Table 1 Effects of saline-alkali stress on seed germination of watermelon
指标Index | 盐碱液浓度/(mmol · L-1)Concentration of saline-alkali solution | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(对照Control) | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | |
相对发芽势Relative germination energy(RGE) | 1.00 ± 0.09 ab | 0.88 ± 0.03 bcd | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 0.92 ± 0.03 abc | 0.85 ± 0.05 cd |
相对发芽率Relative germination rate(RGR) | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 1.01 ± 0.04 a | 0.99 ± 0.02 a | 0.9 8± 0.00 ab |
相对发芽指数Relative germination index(RGI) | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.88 ± 0.02 c | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 0.98 ± 0.01 ab | 0.90 ± 0.01 bc |
相对活力指数Relative vigor index(RVI) | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.81 ± 0.01 b | 0.82 ± 0.05 b | 0.76 ± 0.07 b | 0.58 ± 0.02 c |
相对胚根长 Relative root length(RRL) | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.93 ± 0.02 a | 0.79 ± 0.03 b | 0.77 ± 0.06 b | 0.64 ± 0.03 c |
相对胚芽长 Relative shoot length(RSL) | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 0.88 ± 0.03 b | 0.72 ± 0.03 c | 0.67 ± 0.05 cd | 0.62 ± 0.01 de |
相对胚根鲜质量Relative root fresh weight(RRFW) | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.90 ± 0.06 ab | 0.80 ± 0.05 bc | 0.74 ± 0.003 cd | 0.67 ± 0.02 d |
相对胚芽鲜质量Relative shoot fresh weight(RSFW) | 1.00 ± 0.05 a | 0.70 ± 0.04 b | 0.58 ± 0.04 c | 0.47 ± 0.02 d | 0.45 ± 0.01 d |
相对胚根干质量Relative root dry weight(RRDW) | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 0.96 ± 0.03 ab | 0.95 ± 0.02 abc | 0.93 ± 0.03 abc | 0.90 ± 0.01 bc |
相对胚芽干质量Relative shoot dry weight(RSDW) | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 1.01 ± 0.01 a | 1.01 ± 0.04 a | 1.00 ± 0.05 a | 1.06 ± 0.04 a |
相对根总长度Relative total root length(RTRL) | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.87 ± 0.08 b | 0.86 ± 0.06 b | 0.79 ± 0.06 c | 0.64 ± 0.04 d |
相对根投影面积Relative root projected area(RRPA) | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.82 ± 0.05 b | 0.70 ± 0.02 c | 0.61 ± 0.04 d | 0.46 ± 0.03 e |
相对根表面积Relative root surface area(RRSA) | 1.00 ± 0.09 a | 0.79 ± 0.07 b | 0.77 ± 0.07 b | 0.74 ± 0.06 b | 0.52 ± 0.05 c |
相对根系平均直径Relative average root diameter(RARD) | 1.00 ± 0.17 b | 0.94 ± 0.16 bc | 0.89 ± 0.14 bcd | 0.83 ± 0.14 cd | 0.78 ± 0.13 d |
相对根体积 Relative root volume(RRV) | 1.00 ± 0.14 a | 0.71 ±0.12 b | 0.64 ± 0.04 c | 0.52 ± 0.04 d | 0.37 ± 0.03 e |
指标Index | 盐碱液浓度/(mmol · L-1)Concentration of saline-alkali solution | ||||
50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 100 | |
相对发芽势 Relative germination energy(RGE) | 0.77 ± 0.06 de | 0.77 ± 0.06 de | 0.68 ± 0.03 e | 0.12 ± 0.03 f | - |
相对发芽率Relative germination rate (RGR) | 0.94 ± 0.00 bc | 0.91 ± 0.02 c | 0.90 ± 0.00 c | 0.40 ± 0.02 d | 0.04 ± 0.00 e |
相对发芽指数Relative germination index(RGI) | 0.88 ± 0.04 c | 0.84 ± 0.03 cd | 0.76 ± 0.005 d | 0.22 ± 0.03 e | 0.01 ± 0.01 f |
相对活力指数Relative vigor index(RVI) | 0.56 ± 0.03 c | 0.42 ± 0.02 d | 0.32 ± 0.01 d | 0.02 ± 0.002 e | - |
相对胚根长 Relative root length(RRL) | 0.63 ± 0.01 c | 0.51 ± 0.01 d | 0.43 ± 0.01 e | 0.09 ± 0.01 f | - |
相对胚芽长 Relative shoot length(RSL) | 0.54 ± 0.05 ef | 0.52 ± 0.02 f | 0.45± 0.02 f | - | - |
相对胚根鲜质量Relative root fresh weight(RRFW) | 0.66 ± 0.03 d | 0.50 ± 0.03 e | 0.44 ± 0.02 e | 0.19 ± 0.004 f | - |
相对胚芽鲜质量Relative shoot fresh weight(RSFW) | 0.36 ± 0.002 e | 0.35 ± 0.02 e | 0.32 ± 0.01 ef | - | - |
相对胚根干质量Relative root dry weight(RRDW) | 0.88 ± 0.05 c | 0.71 ± 0.02 d | 0.67 ± 0.05 d | 0.22 ± 0.01 e | - |
相对胚芽干质量Relative shoot dry weight(RSDW) | 1.03 ± 0.03 a | 1.02 ± 0.03 a | 1.06 ± 0.04 a | - | - |
相对根总长度Relative total root length(RTRL) | 0.34 ± 0.03 e | 0.16 ± 0.01 f | 0.13 ± 0.01 f | 0.03 ± 0.002 g | - |
相对根投影面积Relative root projected area(RRPA) | 0.24 ± 0.02 f | 0.12 ± 0.01 g | 0.11 ± 0.01 g | 0.04 ± 0.003 h | - |
相对根表面积Relative root surface area(RRSA) | 0.29 ± 0.01 d | 0.14 ± 0.01 e | 0.12 ± 0.01 e | 0.05 ± 0.001 f | - |
相对根系平均直径Relative average root diameter(RARD) | 0.85 ± 0.16 cd | 0.87 ± 0.14 bcd | 0.89 ± 0.16 bcd | 1.32 ± 0.11 a | - |
相对根体积 Relative root volume(RRV) | 0.21 ± 0.02 f | 0.14 ± 0.02 g | 0.10 ± 0.01 g | 0.08 ± 0.007 g | - |
指标Index | 回归方程Regression equation | R | 半致死浓度/(mmol · L-1) Semi-lethal concentration |
---|---|---|---|
RGE | y = 90.95 + 32.01x-111x | 0.858 | 79.2 |
RGR | y = 90.53 + 76.09x-140x | 0.724 | 93.6 |
RGI | y = 91.62 + 36.28x-108x | 0.764 | 82.8 |
RVI | y = 91.44-63.72x-30.44x | 0.963 | 52.0 |
RRL | y = 93.96-45.22x-50.13x | 0.974 | 58.8 |
RSL | y = 91.42-49.72x-47.9x | 0.936 | 54.6 |
RRFW | y = 97.53-49.67x-51.04x | 0.981 | 59.9 |
RSFW | y = 109-179x + 65.37x | 0.940 | 35.8 |
RRDW | y = 91.15 + 48.27x-128x | 0.906 | 83.3 |
RTRL | y = 85.46-92.27x + 13.43x | 0.933 | 42.7 |
RRPA | y = 87.74-136x + 50.86x | 0.956 | 32.5 |
RRSA | y = 87.94-120x + 35.92x | 0.942 | 36.9 |
RARD | y = 663-1260x + 619x | 0.398 | 187.8 |
RRV | y = 91.63-172x + 82.97x | 0.969 | 26.4 |
均值 Average value | 66.2 |
Table 2 Regression analysis of germination indexes of watermelon seeds and saline-alkali concentrations
指标Index | 回归方程Regression equation | R | 半致死浓度/(mmol · L-1) Semi-lethal concentration |
---|---|---|---|
RGE | y = 90.95 + 32.01x-111x | 0.858 | 79.2 |
RGR | y = 90.53 + 76.09x-140x | 0.724 | 93.6 |
RGI | y = 91.62 + 36.28x-108x | 0.764 | 82.8 |
RVI | y = 91.44-63.72x-30.44x | 0.963 | 52.0 |
RRL | y = 93.96-45.22x-50.13x | 0.974 | 58.8 |
RSL | y = 91.42-49.72x-47.9x | 0.936 | 54.6 |
RRFW | y = 97.53-49.67x-51.04x | 0.981 | 59.9 |
RSFW | y = 109-179x + 65.37x | 0.940 | 35.8 |
RRDW | y = 91.15 + 48.27x-128x | 0.906 | 83.3 |
RTRL | y = 85.46-92.27x + 13.43x | 0.933 | 42.7 |
RRPA | y = 87.74-136x + 50.86x | 0.956 | 32.5 |
RRSA | y = 87.94-120x + 35.92x | 0.942 | 36.9 |
RARD | y = 663-1260x + 619x | 0.398 | 187.8 |
RRV | y = 91.63-172x + 82.97x | 0.969 | 26.4 |
均值 Average value | 66.2 |
Fig. 2 Effects of exogenous MT on the phenotype of watermelon seeds at 8 days of germination under saline-alkali stress CK:Control;S:Treatment with saline-alkali solution;MT25,MT50,MT100,MT200,MT400 indicate the pretreatment with 25,50,100,200、400 µmol · L-1 melatonin solution,respectively.
指标 Index | 处理 Treatment | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | S | MT25 | MT50 | MT100 | MT200 | MT400 | |
RGE | 1.00 ± 0.06 a | 0.90 ± 0.02 b | 0.91 ± 0.01 b | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.91 ± 0.04 b | 0.98 ± 0.02 a | 0.95 ± 0.00 ab |
RGR | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.95 ± 0.05 ab | 0.95 ± 0.04 ab | 0.98 ± 0.00 ab | 0.94 ± 0.03 b | 0.95 ± 0.02 ab | 0.93 ± 0.02 b |
RGI | 1.0 0± 0.07 a | 0.75 ± 0.02 c | 0.76 ± 0.03 c | 0.78 ± 0.01 bc | 0.76 ± 0.07 c | 0.88 ± 0.04 b | 0.79 ± 0.01 bc |
RVI | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.58 ± 0.01 d | 0.61 ± 0.04 d | 0.67 ± 0.03 c | 0.64 ± 0.09 cd | 0.76 ± 0.05 b | 0.59 ± 0.05 cd |
RRL | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.77 ± 0.01 c | 0.79 ± 0.03 c | 0.86 ± 0.04 b | 0.84 ± 0.05 bc | 0.87 ± 0.02 b | 0.75 ± 0.07 c |
RSL | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.31 ± 0.01 c | 0.31 ± 0.03 c | 0.39 ± 0.06 bc | 0.37 ± 0.07 bc | 0.44 ± 0.04 b | 0.38 ± 0.02 bc |
RRFW | 1.00 ± 0.19 a | 0.75 ± 0.03 b | 0.75 ± 0.05 b | 0.80 ± 0.03 b | 0.75 ± 0.08 b | 0.78 ± 0.01 b | 0.71 ± 0.02 b |
RSFW | 1.00 ± 0.13 a | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 0.35 ± 0.04 b | 0.38 ± 0.03 b | 0.32 ± 0.03 b | 0.38 ± 0.01 b | 0.31 ± 0.01 b |
RRDW | 1.00 ± 0.03 a | 0.82 ± 0.17 b | 0.81 ± 0.02 b | 0.83 ± 0.07 ab | 0.87 ± 0.02 ab | 0.87 ± 0.02 ab | 0.78 ± 0.12 b |
RSDW | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 0.91 ± 0.04 b | 0.92 ± 0.04 b | 0.94 ± 0.03 ab | 0.94 ± 0.02 ab | 0.95 ± 0.02 ab | 0.93 ± 0.07 ab |
RTRL | 1.00 ± 0.12 a | 0.59 ± 0.05 c | 0.61 ± 0.03 c | 0.75 ± 0.07 b | 0.64 ± 0.04 bc | 0.66 ± 0.05 bc | 0.63 ± 0.08 bc |
RRPA | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.36 ± 0.03 c | 0.37 ± 0.02 c | 0.45 ± 0.03 b | 0.46 ± 0.03 b | 0.50 ± 0.03 b | 0.47 ± 0.03 b |
RRSA | 1.00 ± 0.05 a | 0.15 ± 0.02 c | 0.15 ± 0.02 c | 0.21 ± 0.02 b | 0.17 ± 0.01 bc | 0.17 ± 0.02 bc | 0.16 ± 0.03 bc |
RARD | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.6 7± 0.04 b | 0.62 ± 0.05 b | 0.66 ± 0.06 b | 0.78 ± 0.13 b | 0.61 ± 0.02 b | 0.64 ± 0.04 b |
RRV | 1.00 ± 0.03 a | 0.55 ± 0.04 c | 0.57 ± 0.03 c | 0.87 ± 0.08 b | 0.37 ± 0.03 c | 0.67 ± 0.03 c | 0.62 ± 0.09 c |
Table 3 Effects of exogenous MT on seed germination of watermelon under saline-alkali stress
指标 Index | 处理 Treatment | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | S | MT25 | MT50 | MT100 | MT200 | MT400 | |
RGE | 1.00 ± 0.06 a | 0.90 ± 0.02 b | 0.91 ± 0.01 b | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.91 ± 0.04 b | 0.98 ± 0.02 a | 0.95 ± 0.00 ab |
RGR | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.95 ± 0.05 ab | 0.95 ± 0.04 ab | 0.98 ± 0.00 ab | 0.94 ± 0.03 b | 0.95 ± 0.02 ab | 0.93 ± 0.02 b |
RGI | 1.0 0± 0.07 a | 0.75 ± 0.02 c | 0.76 ± 0.03 c | 0.78 ± 0.01 bc | 0.76 ± 0.07 c | 0.88 ± 0.04 b | 0.79 ± 0.01 bc |
RVI | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.58 ± 0.01 d | 0.61 ± 0.04 d | 0.67 ± 0.03 c | 0.64 ± 0.09 cd | 0.76 ± 0.05 b | 0.59 ± 0.05 cd |
RRL | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.77 ± 0.01 c | 0.79 ± 0.03 c | 0.86 ± 0.04 b | 0.84 ± 0.05 bc | 0.87 ± 0.02 b | 0.75 ± 0.07 c |
RSL | 1.00 ± 0.07 a | 0.31 ± 0.01 c | 0.31 ± 0.03 c | 0.39 ± 0.06 bc | 0.37 ± 0.07 bc | 0.44 ± 0.04 b | 0.38 ± 0.02 bc |
RRFW | 1.00 ± 0.19 a | 0.75 ± 0.03 b | 0.75 ± 0.05 b | 0.80 ± 0.03 b | 0.75 ± 0.08 b | 0.78 ± 0.01 b | 0.71 ± 0.02 b |
RSFW | 1.00 ± 0.13 a | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 0.35 ± 0.04 b | 0.38 ± 0.03 b | 0.32 ± 0.03 b | 0.38 ± 0.01 b | 0.31 ± 0.01 b |
RRDW | 1.00 ± 0.03 a | 0.82 ± 0.17 b | 0.81 ± 0.02 b | 0.83 ± 0.07 ab | 0.87 ± 0.02 ab | 0.87 ± 0.02 ab | 0.78 ± 0.12 b |
RSDW | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 0.91 ± 0.04 b | 0.92 ± 0.04 b | 0.94 ± 0.03 ab | 0.94 ± 0.02 ab | 0.95 ± 0.02 ab | 0.93 ± 0.07 ab |
RTRL | 1.00 ± 0.12 a | 0.59 ± 0.05 c | 0.61 ± 0.03 c | 0.75 ± 0.07 b | 0.64 ± 0.04 bc | 0.66 ± 0.05 bc | 0.63 ± 0.08 bc |
RRPA | 1.00 ± 0.08 a | 0.36 ± 0.03 c | 0.37 ± 0.02 c | 0.45 ± 0.03 b | 0.46 ± 0.03 b | 0.50 ± 0.03 b | 0.47 ± 0.03 b |
RRSA | 1.00 ± 0.05 a | 0.15 ± 0.02 c | 0.15 ± 0.02 c | 0.21 ± 0.02 b | 0.17 ± 0.01 bc | 0.17 ± 0.02 bc | 0.16 ± 0.03 bc |
RARD | 1.00 ± 0.02 a | 0.6 7± 0.04 b | 0.62 ± 0.05 b | 0.66 ± 0.06 b | 0.78 ± 0.13 b | 0.61 ± 0.02 b | 0.64 ± 0.04 b |
RRV | 1.00 ± 0.03 a | 0.55 ± 0.04 c | 0.57 ± 0.03 c | 0.87 ± 0.08 b | 0.37 ± 0.03 c | 0.67 ± 0.03 c | 0.62 ± 0.09 c |
指标Index | 处理Treatment | 权重Weight | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | S | MT25 | MT50 | MT100 | MT200 | MT400 | ||
RGE | 1.00 | 0 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 0.13 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.01 |
RGR | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.67 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.01 |
RGI | 1.00 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
RVI | 1.00 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.43 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
RRL | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0 | 0.03 |
RGL | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
RFWR | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0 | 0.03 |
RFWG | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
RDWR | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 00 | 0.02 |
RDWG | 1.00 | 0 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.25 | 0.01 |
RTRL | 1.00 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.05 |
RRPA | 1.00 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
RRRSA | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.27 |
RARD | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
RRV | 1.00 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.72 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.06 |
CEV | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.06 | |
排名Rank | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
Table 4 Effects of exogenous MT on seed germination of watermelon under saline-alkali stress
指标Index | 处理Treatment | 权重Weight | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | S | MT25 | MT50 | MT100 | MT200 | MT400 | ||
RGE | 1.00 | 0 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 0.13 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.01 |
RGR | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.67 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.01 |
RGI | 1.00 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
RVI | 1.00 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.43 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
RRL | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0 | 0.03 |
RGL | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
RFWR | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0 | 0.03 |
RFWG | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
RDWR | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 00 | 0.02 |
RDWG | 1.00 | 0 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.25 | 0.01 |
RTRL | 1.00 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.05 |
RRPA | 1.00 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
RRRSA | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.27 |
RARD | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
RRV | 1.00 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.72 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.06 |
CEV | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.06 | |
排名Rank | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
Fig. 3 Correlation analysis of relative values and comprehensive evaluation values of various germination indicators in watermelon seeds under exogenous MT treatment Abbreviations are the same as those given in Table 1;CEV:comprehensive evaluation value * P < 0.05
处理 Treatment | SOD活性/(U · g-1) SOD activity | POD活性/(U · g-1) POD activity | CAT活性/(U · g-1) CAT activity | H2O2含量/(µmol · g-1 · FW) H2O2 content |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 237.47 ± 10.06 a | 87.36 ± 3.01 a | 103.91 ± 5.13 a | 2.43 ± 0.11 e |
S | 101.09 ± 8.02 e | 51.11 ± 2.23 e | 48.95 ± 2.40 d | 4.21 ± 0.13 a |
MT25 | 134.25 ± 7.07 cd | 64.54 ± 2.31 cd | 71.76 ± 3.03 c | 3.80 ± 0.10 bc |
MT50 | 187.56 ± 10.28 b | 75.68 ± 4.02 b | 88.61 ± 4.14 b | 3.04 ± 0.12 d |
MT100 | 142.05 ± 9.08 cd | 70.05 ± 3.15 bc | 74.79 ± 2.31 c | 3.78 ± 0.16 bc |
MT200 | 156.89 ± 8.97 c | 73.99 ± 1.38 b | 79.31 ± 3.03 bc | 3.67 ± 0.29 bc |
MT400 | 126.92 ± 7.19 d | 62.88 ± 2.45 d | 70. 57 ± 6.05 c | 3.96 ± 0.24 ab |
处理 Treatment | MDA含量/(µmol · g-1 · FW) MDA content | 相对电导率/% Relative conductivity | α-淀粉酶活性/(mg · g-1 · min-1 · FW) α-amylase activity | 成活率/% Survival rate of seedlings |
CK | 7.70 ± 0.43 e | 41.23 ± 3.52 e | 2.98 ± 0.08 a | 93.33 ± 2.31 a |
S | 15.78 ± 0.95 a | 76.58 ± 4.29 a | 1.34 ± 0.03 d | 70.67 ± 4.62 d |
MT25 | 11.29 ± 0.59 bc | 70.31 ± 4.58 bc | 1.76 ± 0.10 c | 77.33 ± 6.11 cd |
MT50 | 9.86 ± 0.23 d | 53.44 ± 3.01 d | 2.39 ± 0.09 b | 86.67 ± 2.31 ab |
MT100 | 11.32 ± 0.82 bc | 71.85 ± 3.63 bc | 1.84 ± 0.14 c | 78.67 ± 6.11 bcd |
MT200 | 10.97 ± 0.46 c | 65.96 ± 3.68 c | 1.90 ± 0.11 c | 80.00 ± 4.00 bc |
MT400 | 12.44 ± 1.07 b | 74.82 ± 3.95 ab | 1.75 ± 0.13 c | 78.67 ± 4.62 bcd |
Table 5 Effects of exogenous MT on physiological indexes and survival rate of watermelon under saline-alkali stress
处理 Treatment | SOD活性/(U · g-1) SOD activity | POD活性/(U · g-1) POD activity | CAT活性/(U · g-1) CAT activity | H2O2含量/(µmol · g-1 · FW) H2O2 content |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 237.47 ± 10.06 a | 87.36 ± 3.01 a | 103.91 ± 5.13 a | 2.43 ± 0.11 e |
S | 101.09 ± 8.02 e | 51.11 ± 2.23 e | 48.95 ± 2.40 d | 4.21 ± 0.13 a |
MT25 | 134.25 ± 7.07 cd | 64.54 ± 2.31 cd | 71.76 ± 3.03 c | 3.80 ± 0.10 bc |
MT50 | 187.56 ± 10.28 b | 75.68 ± 4.02 b | 88.61 ± 4.14 b | 3.04 ± 0.12 d |
MT100 | 142.05 ± 9.08 cd | 70.05 ± 3.15 bc | 74.79 ± 2.31 c | 3.78 ± 0.16 bc |
MT200 | 156.89 ± 8.97 c | 73.99 ± 1.38 b | 79.31 ± 3.03 bc | 3.67 ± 0.29 bc |
MT400 | 126.92 ± 7.19 d | 62.88 ± 2.45 d | 70. 57 ± 6.05 c | 3.96 ± 0.24 ab |
处理 Treatment | MDA含量/(µmol · g-1 · FW) MDA content | 相对电导率/% Relative conductivity | α-淀粉酶活性/(mg · g-1 · min-1 · FW) α-amylase activity | 成活率/% Survival rate of seedlings |
CK | 7.70 ± 0.43 e | 41.23 ± 3.52 e | 2.98 ± 0.08 a | 93.33 ± 2.31 a |
S | 15.78 ± 0.95 a | 76.58 ± 4.29 a | 1.34 ± 0.03 d | 70.67 ± 4.62 d |
MT25 | 11.29 ± 0.59 bc | 70.31 ± 4.58 bc | 1.76 ± 0.10 c | 77.33 ± 6.11 cd |
MT50 | 9.86 ± 0.23 d | 53.44 ± 3.01 d | 2.39 ± 0.09 b | 86.67 ± 2.31 ab |
MT100 | 11.32 ± 0.82 bc | 71.85 ± 3.63 bc | 1.84 ± 0.14 c | 78.67 ± 6.11 bcd |
MT200 | 10.97 ± 0.46 c | 65.96 ± 3.68 c | 1.90 ± 0.11 c | 80.00 ± 4.00 bc |
MT400 | 12.44 ± 1.07 b | 74.82 ± 3.95 ab | 1.75 ± 0.13 c | 78.67 ± 4.62 bcd |
处理 Treatment | 株高/cm Height | 茎粗/mm Stem diameter | 叶面积/cm2 Leaf area | SPAD | 鲜质量/g Fresh weight | 干质量/g Dry weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上Shoot | 根Root | 地上Shoot | 根Root | |||||
CK | 50.43 ± 2.02 a | 6.19 ± 0.29 a | 465.00 ± 29.27 a | 62.77 ± 0.81 a | 20.66 ± 0.54 a | 2.41 ± 0.15 a | 3.04 ± 0.11 a | 0.19 ± 0.01 a |
S | 35.57 ± 0.90 c | 5.46 ± 0.34 c | 402.07 ± 20.23 b | 59.07 ± 0.59 c | 16.87 ± 0.81 c | 1.97 ± 0.10 b | 2.55 ± 0.07 c | 0.15 ± 0.01 d |
MT25 | 36.67 ± 0.86 bc | 5.66 ± 0.30 bc | 416.62 ± 16.06 ab | 59.93 ± 0.92 bc | 16.90 ± 0.27 c | 2.11 ± 0.04 ab | 2.59 ± 0.01 c | 0.18 ± 0.00 ab |
MT50 | 38.10 ± 1.32 b | 5.99 ± 0.05 ab | 423.64 ± 33.24 ab | 62.00 ± 0.36 a | 17.98 ± 0.53 b | 2.31 ± 0.23 a | 2.77 ± 0.11 b | 0.18 ± 0.01 ab |
MT100 | 36.93 ± 0.29 bc | 5.92 ± 0.12 abc | 434.35 ± 33.36 ab | 60.97 ± 0.21 abc | 16.82 ± 0.42 c | 2.35 ± 0.17 a | 2.67 ± 0.10 bc | 0.17 ± 0.01 bc |
MT200 | 35.90 ± 1.39 bc | 6.00 ± 0.23 ab | 448.66 ± 15.27 ab | 61.30 ± 0.95 ab | 17.30 ± 0.39 bc | 2.22 ± 0.15 ab | 2.63 ± 0.10 bc | 0.18 ± 0.00 ab |
MT400 | 34.87 ± 0.64 c | 5.69 ± 0.34 bc | 428.42 ± 30.51 ab | 60.93 ± 0.85 abc | 16.38 ± 0.49 c | 2.18 ± 0.21 ab | 2.50 ± 0.13 c | 0.16 ± 0.01 cd |
Table 6 Effects of exogenous MT on watermelon seedling growth under saline-alkali stress
处理 Treatment | 株高/cm Height | 茎粗/mm Stem diameter | 叶面积/cm2 Leaf area | SPAD | 鲜质量/g Fresh weight | 干质量/g Dry weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上Shoot | 根Root | 地上Shoot | 根Root | |||||
CK | 50.43 ± 2.02 a | 6.19 ± 0.29 a | 465.00 ± 29.27 a | 62.77 ± 0.81 a | 20.66 ± 0.54 a | 2.41 ± 0.15 a | 3.04 ± 0.11 a | 0.19 ± 0.01 a |
S | 35.57 ± 0.90 c | 5.46 ± 0.34 c | 402.07 ± 20.23 b | 59.07 ± 0.59 c | 16.87 ± 0.81 c | 1.97 ± 0.10 b | 2.55 ± 0.07 c | 0.15 ± 0.01 d |
MT25 | 36.67 ± 0.86 bc | 5.66 ± 0.30 bc | 416.62 ± 16.06 ab | 59.93 ± 0.92 bc | 16.90 ± 0.27 c | 2.11 ± 0.04 ab | 2.59 ± 0.01 c | 0.18 ± 0.00 ab |
MT50 | 38.10 ± 1.32 b | 5.99 ± 0.05 ab | 423.64 ± 33.24 ab | 62.00 ± 0.36 a | 17.98 ± 0.53 b | 2.31 ± 0.23 a | 2.77 ± 0.11 b | 0.18 ± 0.01 ab |
MT100 | 36.93 ± 0.29 bc | 5.92 ± 0.12 abc | 434.35 ± 33.36 ab | 60.97 ± 0.21 abc | 16.82 ± 0.42 c | 2.35 ± 0.17 a | 2.67 ± 0.10 bc | 0.17 ± 0.01 bc |
MT200 | 35.90 ± 1.39 bc | 6.00 ± 0.23 ab | 448.66 ± 15.27 ab | 61.30 ± 0.95 ab | 17.30 ± 0.39 bc | 2.22 ± 0.15 ab | 2.63 ± 0.10 bc | 0.18 ± 0.00 ab |
MT400 | 34.87 ± 0.64 c | 5.69 ± 0.34 bc | 428.42 ± 30.51 ab | 60.93 ± 0.85 abc | 16.38 ± 0.49 c | 2.18 ± 0.21 ab | 2.50 ± 0.13 c | 0.16 ± 0.01 cd |
[1] |
|
巴图, 赵萌莉, 李倩, 韩国栋, 徐军. 2017. 不同苜蓿品种种子发芽对盐胁迫的响应. 水土保持通报, 37 (2):96-101.
|
|
[2] |
|
曹春信, 吴瑛莉, 刘新华. 2017. 浙中地区早春设施小西瓜品种比较试验. 浙江农业科学, 58 (6):930-932.
|
|
[3] |
|
柴艳, 孙宗玖, 李培英, 巴德木其其格, 张向向, 杨静. 2017. 新疆狗牙根种质芽期耐盐性综合评价. 草业学报, 26 (8):154-167.
|
|
[4] |
|
程维舜, 曾红霞, 张娜, 汤谧, 任俭, 孙玉宏. 2018. 春季大棚优质小型西瓜品种比较试验. 长江蔬菜,(6):55-57.
|
|
[5] |
|
董志刚, 程智慧. 2009. 番茄品种资源芽苗期和幼苗期的耐盐性及耐盐指标评价. 生态学报, 29 (3):1348-1355.
|
|
[6] |
|
段青青, 张禄祺, 张自坤, 王静静, 常培培, 张洪勇, 贺洪军. 2019. 补光时间及光质对温室甜椒生长及产量品质的影响. 农业工程学报, 35 (24):213-222.
|
|
[7] |
|
方苏, 闫兴富, 周立彪. 2012. 盐胁迫对西瓜和甜瓜种子萌发的影响. 湖北农业科学, 51 (8):1595-1598.
|
|
[8] |
FAO. 2022. https://www.faostat.fao.org.
|
[9] |
|
冯一清, 仇胜囡, 吴月, 解阳, 张晓伟, 毕焕改, 艾希珍. 2024. 褪黑素对日光温室黄瓜耐冷性的影响. 园艺学报, 51 (11):2633-2644.
|
|
[10] |
|
高文华. 2019. 外源褪黑素处理对西瓜生长及产量和品质的影响[硕士论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
|
|
[11] |
|
耿书德, 吴燕, 高青海. 2022. 盐胁迫下外源褪黑素浸种对西瓜种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 50 (2):52-55.
|
|
[12] |
|
巩彪, 史庆华. 2017. 园艺作物褪黑素的研究进展. 中国农业科学, 50 (12):2326-2337.
|
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
古咸彬, 陆玲鸿, 宋根华, 肖金平, 张慧琴. 2022. 外源褪黑素预处理对干旱胁迫下桃苗生长的缓解效应. 植物生理学报, 58 (2):309-318.
|
|
[15] |
|
韩宏伟, 佘建华, 王强, 庄红梅, 胡柏文, 冯红鹰, 王浩. 2017. 新疆哈密瓜不同年代品种萌发期耐盐碱性评价. 新疆农业科学, 54 (3):442-451.
|
|
[16] |
|
韩志平, 郭世荣, 李娟. 2008. 设施栽培西瓜品种对盐胁迫的响应. 江苏农业学报, 24 (6):888-895.
|
|
[17] |
|
贺滉, 牛美丽, 党选民, 詹园凤. 2018. 外源物质对盐胁迫下西瓜种子发芽的影响. 北方园艺,(4):66-71.
|
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
胡卉芳, 崔乐乐, 王娟, 王照兰, 杜建材. 2022. 老芒麦不同品系种子萌发期耐盐性. 干旱区资源与环境, 36 (11):119-126.
|
|
[20] |
|
霍宏亮, 王超, 杨祥, 曹玉芬, 田路明, 董星光, 张莹, 齐丹, 徐家玉, 刘超. 2022. 杜梨对盐碱胁迫的生理响应及耐盐碱性评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 23 (2):480-492.
|
|
[21] |
|
兰艳, 朱林, 王甜甜, 荆庆芳, 张杨, 赵学琳. 2022. 混合盐碱胁迫对3种稗属牧草种子萌发的影响. 种子, 41 (3):37-44.
|
|
[22] |
|
李芳兰. 2021. 碱胁迫对中花11种子萌发、幼苗生长的影响及外源物的缓解作用[硕士论文]. 银川: 宁夏大学.
|
|
[23] |
|
李凤勤. 2019. 小麦萌发期耐盐碱相关性状关联分析及种质资源的筛选[硕士论文]. 泰安: 山东农业大学.
|
|
[24] |
|
梁宇鹏, 张杰, 梁晓宁, 谢思敏. 2022. 褪黑素对荻种子萌发及幼苗生长和生理的影响. 安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版), 45 (6):553-560.
|
|
[25] |
|
刘铎, 丛日春, 党宏忠, 李庆梅, 刘德玺, 杨庆山. 2014. 柳树幼苗渗透调节物质对中、碱性钠盐响应的差异性. 生态环境学报, 23 (9):1531-1535.
|
|
[26] |
|
刘佳奇, 李丽, 杨红红, 孙敏, 冯汉青. 2022. 盐胁迫下褪黑素对小麦种子萌发和幼苗生理特性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 42 (7):857-863.
|
|
[27] |
|
刘娜. 2023. 褪黑素浸种对盐碱胁迫下侧柏种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 山西林业科技, 52 (1):23-25,52.
|
|
[28] |
|
刘彤彤, 李宁, 魏良迪, 杨进文, 史雨刚, 王曙光, 孙黛珍. 2022. 山西省主推小麦品种芽期及苗期耐盐性的综合评价. 中国农业大学学报, 27 (2):22-33.
|
|
[29] |
|
罗达, 史彦江, 宋锋惠, 李嘉诚. 2019. 盐胁迫对平欧杂种榛幼苗生长、光合荧光特性及根系构型的影响. 应用生态学报, 30 (10):3376-3384.
|
|
[30] |
|
毛建才, 熊木, 翟文强, 伊鸿平, 黄远, 张学军. 2020. 短期NaCl胁迫下9个甜瓜品种抗性生理指标的综合评价. 新疆农业科学, 57 (8):1421-1430.
|
|
[31] |
|
苗丽, 巩彪, 王秀峰, 魏珉, 杨凤娟, 李岩, 史庆华. 2014. 西瓜品种对NaHCO3胁迫的生理响应差异. 新疆农业科学, 51 (6):1097-1105.
|
|
[32] |
|
聂必林, 巫利梅, 如马南木·尼合买提, 王狄宁, 吕海英. 2021. 外源褪黑素对复合盐碱胁迫下黑果枸杞种子萌发和幼苗生长的缓解效应. 西北植物学报, 41 (10):1711-1724.
|
|
[33] |
|
聂萌恩, 宁娜, 张一中, 李双双, 范昕琦, 柳青山, 张海平. 2023. 褪黑素对盐胁迫下高粱种子萌发的缓解效应及生理机制. 种子, 42 (4):31-40,63.
|
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
邵佳蓉, 宋春波, 卞坤, 陈伟, 杨震峰. 2016. 桃果实PpSIZ1基因对低温和外源褪黑素处理的响应. 园艺学报, 43 (7):1257-1266.
|
|
[36] |
|
施雨. 2022. 褪黑素对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗生长生理特性的影响[硕士论文]. 扬州: 扬州大学.
|
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
孙敏红, 邓云, 和相琼. 2011. NaCl胁迫对不同西瓜品种种子发芽及其幼苗生长特性的影响. 北方园艺, 244 (13):24-28.
|
|
[39] |
|
孙文君. 2021. 低温和盐碱胁迫下棉花幼苗对外源褪黑素的生理响应[硕士论文]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学.
|
|
[40] |
|
孙志娟, 刘文杰, 郑晓东, 袭祥利, 马长青, 刘晓丽, 王彩虹, 田义轲. 2023. 褪黑素对盐碱胁迫下平邑甜茶幼苗生长的影响及其机制. 园艺学报, 50 (8):1697-1710.
|
|
[41] |
|
王明瑶, 曹亮, 于奇, 邹京南, 何松榆, 秦彬, 王梦雪, 张玉先. 2019. 褪黑素浸种对盐碱胁迫下大豆种子萌发的影响. 作物杂志, 193 (6):195-202.
|
|
[42] |
|
王佺珍, 刘倩, 高娅妮, 柳旭. 2017. 植物对盐碱胁迫的响应机制研究进展. 生态学报, 37 (16):5565-5577.
|
|
[43] |
|
王伟香, 张锐敏, 孙艳, 刘建龙. 2016. 外源褪黑素对硝酸盐胁迫条件下黄瓜幼苗抗氧化系统的影响. 园艺学报, 43 (4):695-703.
|
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
汪正香. 2019. 外源褪黑素对低温胁迫下嫁接西瓜幼苗生长生理的影响[硕士论文]. 成都: 四川农业大学.
|
|
[47] |
|
魏嘉, 蔡勤安, 李源, 尚丽霞, 卜显锋, 于志晶, 马瑞. 2022. 植物对盐碱胁迫响应机制的研究进展. 山东农业科学, 54 (4):156-164.
|
|
[48] |
|
吴鹏, 吕剑, 郁继华, 刘娜, 李金武, 金莉, 金宁, 王舒亚. 2022. 褪黑素对盐碱复合胁迫下黄瓜幼苗光合特性和渗透调节物质含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 33 (7):1901-1910.
|
|
[49] |
|
许丽丽, 岳倩宇, 卞凤娥, 翟衡, 姚玉新. 2017. 褪黑素对葡萄果实成熟及乙烯和ABA含量的影响. 植物生理学报, 53 (12):2181-2188.
|
|
[50] |
|
杨发荣, 刘文瑜, 黄杰, 魏玉明, 金茜. 2017. 不同藜麦品种对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价. 草业学报, 26 (12):77-88.
|
|
[51] |
|
杨丽敏, 谭海, 戴冬洋, 徐鑫, 王超, 王岭, 盛云燕. 2022. 盐碱胁迫对甜瓜种子萌发的影响及综合评价. 种子, 41 (8):71-79.
|
|
[52] |
|
叶林. 2019. 丛枝菌根真菌对西瓜盐碱胁迫的缓解效应及其调控机理[博士论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
|
|
[53] |
|
袁小环, 武菊英, 杨学军, 滕文军. 2012. 基于半致死浓度的观赏草萌发期和幼苗期耐盐性评价. 中国草地学报, 34 (6):49-53.
|
|
[54] |
|
袁雨豪, 杨清华, 党科, 杨璞, 高金锋, 高小丽, 王鹏科, 陆平, 刘敏轩, 冯佰利. 2019. 糜子资源耐盐性评价与盐胁迫生理响应. 中国农业科学, 52 (22):4066-4078.
|
|
[55] |
|
云雪雪, 陈雨生. 2020. 国际盐碱地开发动态及其对我国的启示. 国土与自然资源研究,(1):84-87.
|
|
[56] |
|
张娜. 2014. 褪黑素处理对渗透胁迫下黄瓜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响及其分子机制[博士论文]. 北京: 中国农业大学.
|
|
[57] |
|
张晓磊, 刘晓静, 齐敏兴, 刘艳楠, 蒯佳林. 2013. 混合盐碱对紫花苜蓿苗期根系特征的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 21 (3):340-346.
|
|
[58] |
|
张晓艳, 李燕芳, 黄鑫, 杨建, 万素梅. 2021. 盐碱胁迫对不同甜瓜品种种子萌发及植株生长发育的影响. 北方园艺,(10):47-52.
|
|
[59] |
|
张永平, 陈幼源, 陈绯翔. 2009. 盐碱胁迫对甜瓜种子萌发的影响. 上海农业学报, 25 (4):22-25.
|
|
[60] |
|
郑重, 张凤荣, 马富裕, 周建伟, 何帅. 2010. 基于棉花-水-盐生产函数的耕地盐碱化分级与评价. 灌溉排水学报, 29 (1):47-49.
|
|
[61] |
|
朱迎春, 孙德玺, 邓云, 安国林, 李卫华, 司文静, 刘君璞. 2018. NaCl胁迫对西瓜种子发芽的影响. 中国瓜菜, 31 (12):19-23.
|
|
[62] |
|
左月桃, 董玲, 任晓松, 刘赵月, 左师宇, 李晶. 2022. 外源褪黑素对盐碱胁迫下小黑麦种子萌发幼苗生长、抗氧化能力的影响. 麦类作物学报, 42 (1):90-99.
|
[1] | LIU Weisheng, LIU Shuai, SUN Julong, BAI Zhigang, ZHANG Yangdong, ZHANG Tao, CUI Aihua, HU Qixing. A New Mid-Early Maturing Watermelon Cultivar‘Cuijia 76’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 147-148. |
[2] | YU Rong, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, GUO Song, LIU Shengfeng, DU Huiying. A New Watermelon Cultivar‘Ningnongke 10’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 149-150. |
[3] | CUI Aihua, ZHANG Dezheng, SUN Julong, BAI Zhigang, HU Qixing, LIU Weisheng, ZHANG Yangdong, LIU Shuai, XIAO Yuanlong, XIAHOU Wei, WU Yisheng. A New Watermelon Cultivar‘Cuimi’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 151-152. |
[4] | ZHI Hui, YANG Jingjing, LUO Jianrang. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis and Ornamental Comprehensive Evaluation of Ninety-six Tree Peony Cultivars Based on Landscape Application [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(3): 635-645. |
[5] | XU Tong, WANG Yue, WU Lina, ZHANG Hang, YIN Lilai, XU Keyu, ZHENG Xiaolin. Effects of Melatonin Treatment on Fruit Quality and Anthocyanin Metabolism of Postharvest‘Taoxingli’Plum [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 395-405. |
[6] | HUANG Peng, DING Jie, LIU Chunyan, LI Hongying, LI Xinyu, LIU Yaowen, QIN Wen. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Edible Coating on Postharvest Quality of Blueberry [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1361-1376. |
[7] | WU Xiangqi, SUN Li, YU Zheping, YU Qinpei, LIANG Senmiao, ZHENG Xiliang, QI Xingjiang, ZHANG Shuwen. Functional Study of MrSPL4 Gene in Response to Drought and Low Temperature Stress in Chinese Bayberry [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(5): 927-938. |
[8] | HAO Jinqian, WANG Baoju, TONG Jing, LIU Mingchi, WU Zhanhui, WANG Suna, LIU Ning. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Growth,Quality and Flavor of Hydroponic Chinese Chive [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(4): 847-858. |
[9] | WANG Yanan, LIU Xutao, JING Tongtong, CHAI Yating, ZHANG Xiaowei, AI Xizhen, BI Huangai. Effect of Melatonin on Antioxidant System of Tomato Senescent Leaves [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2594-2606. |
[10] | FENG Yiqing, QIU Shengnan, WU Yue, XIE Yang, ZHANG Xiaowei, BI Huangai, AI Xizhen. Effect of Exogenous Melatonin on the Cold Tolerance of Cucumber in Solar-Greenhouse [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2633-2644. |
[11] | WU Qiong, ZHANG Tiantian, LI Maoying, WU Huiling, GUO Shaogui, ZHANG Jie, REN Yi, ZHANG Haiying, GONG Guoyi. Preliminary Study on the Prevention and Control Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Strain 5 on Cucumber Green Mottled Mosaic Virus Disease on Watermelon [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(10): 2427-2438. |
[12] | HUANG Jinyan, HE Yi, LI Guifen, YE Yunfeng, XIE Huayun, LI Tianyan, HONG Rixin, QIN Sihua, LIU Tangjing, WEI Zhengguang, LI Zhi. A New Mid-Early Maturing Watermelon Cultivar‘Guixi 10’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(10): 2479-2480. |
[13] | WANG Yuhang, LI Dou, WANG Chunheng, JIN Xin, CHENG Yajuan, DAI Zibo, FENG Lidan, YANG Jiangshan. The Effect of Melatonin on the Subcellular Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism During Development and Senescence in Grape Leaves [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(1): 103-120. |
[14] | ZHANG Jie, GONG Guoyi, ZHANG Haiying, GUO Shaogui, REN Yi, LI Maoying, and XU Yong . A New Watermelon Hybrid‘Jingmei 10K03’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 101-102. |
[15] | YU Rong, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, GUO Song, LIU Shengfeng, and DU Huiying. A New Watermelon Cultivar‘Ningnongke 6’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 105-106. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd