Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (9): 2143-2154.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0061
• Cultivation · Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHONG Yang1, QIN Yazhi1, LUO Shuai1, JING Yuling1, WANG Wanxing2, LI Guangcun2, HU Xinxi3, QIN Yuzhi3, CHENG Xu1,*(), XIONG Xingyao1,*(
)
Received:
2024-05-27
Revised:
2024-07-22
Online:
2024-09-25
Published:
2024-09-19
Contact:
CHENG Xu, XIONG Xingyao
ZHONG Yang, QIN Yazhi, LUO Shuai, JING Yuling, WANG Wanxing, LI Guangcun, HU Xinxi, QIN Yuzhi, CHENG Xu, XIONG Xingyao. Effects of Peat Soil and Mushroom Residue Application on the Potato Root-Associated Microbiome and Yield[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 2143-2154.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0061
处理 Treatment | 大团聚体 Macro-aggregates | 微团聚体 Micro-aggregates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
> 2.0 mm | 0.25 ~ 2.00 mm | 合计Total | 0.053 ~ 0.250 mm | < 0.053 mm | 合计Total | |
对照 Control | 20.56 ± 1.37 | 60.22 ± 3.10 | 80.78 ± 4.34 | 16.90 ± 3.16 | 2.32 ± 1.24 | 19.22 ± 4.34 |
泥炭土 Peat soil | 20.40 ± 0.82 | 49.14 ± 1.48* | 69.54 ± 2.29* | 24.00 ± 1.94 | 6.47 ± 0.20** | 30.46 ± 2.12* |
蘑菇渣 Mushroom residue | 56.65 ± 3.49** | 33.20 ± 2.40** | 89.86 ± 5.77 | 8.77 ± 2.16* | 1.37 ± 0.33 | 10.14 ± 2.48 |
Table 1 Content distribution of soil aggregates under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 大团聚体 Macro-aggregates | 微团聚体 Micro-aggregates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
> 2.0 mm | 0.25 ~ 2.00 mm | 合计Total | 0.053 ~ 0.250 mm | < 0.053 mm | 合计Total | |
对照 Control | 20.56 ± 1.37 | 60.22 ± 3.10 | 80.78 ± 4.34 | 16.90 ± 3.16 | 2.32 ± 1.24 | 19.22 ± 4.34 |
泥炭土 Peat soil | 20.40 ± 0.82 | 49.14 ± 1.48* | 69.54 ± 2.29* | 24.00 ± 1.94 | 6.47 ± 0.20** | 30.46 ± 2.12* |
蘑菇渣 Mushroom residue | 56.65 ± 3.49** | 33.20 ± 2.40** | 89.86 ± 5.77 | 8.77 ± 2.16* | 1.37 ± 0.33 | 10.14 ± 2.48 |
处理 Treatment | pH | 有机碳/(g · kg-1) Organic C | 全氮/(g · kg-1) Total N | 速效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available P | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available K | 碳氮比 C/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 6.78 ± 0.06 | 9.78 ± 1.31 | 0.92 ± 0.11 | 96.69 ± 8.02 | 52.00 ± 5.05 | 10.58 ± 0.19 |
泥炭土 Peat soil | 6.41 ± 0.04** | 89.43 ± 0.75** | 5.38 ± 0.02** | 67.66 ± 10.12** | 187.80 ± 20.16** | 16.63 ± 0.08** |
蘑菇渣Mushroom residue | 7.19 ± 0.13* | 53.48 ± 5.15** | 4.93 ± 0.42** | 589.93 ± 3.06** | 1 111.77 ± 79.55** | 10.84 ± 0.13 |
Table 2 Soil physical and chemical properties under different treatments
处理 Treatment | pH | 有机碳/(g · kg-1) Organic C | 全氮/(g · kg-1) Total N | 速效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available P | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available K | 碳氮比 C/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 6.78 ± 0.06 | 9.78 ± 1.31 | 0.92 ± 0.11 | 96.69 ± 8.02 | 52.00 ± 5.05 | 10.58 ± 0.19 |
泥炭土 Peat soil | 6.41 ± 0.04** | 89.43 ± 0.75** | 5.38 ± 0.02** | 67.66 ± 10.12** | 187.80 ± 20.16** | 16.63 ± 0.08** |
蘑菇渣Mushroom residue | 7.19 ± 0.13* | 53.48 ± 5.15** | 4.93 ± 0.42** | 589.93 ± 3.06** | 1 111.77 ± 79.55** | 10.84 ± 0.13 |
Fig. 1 Shannon index of bacterial and fungal communities in different potato niches and soil improvement treatments CK:Control;PS:Peat soil;MR:Mushroom residue;EC:Endophytic compartment;RH:Rhizosphere soil;BS:Bulk soil. The same below.
Fig. 2 Relative abundance of bacterial and fungal communities in different potato niches and soil improvement treatments A:Bacterial phylum-level;B:Fungal phylum-level;C:Fungal genus-level.
Fig. 4 Co-occurrence network analysis of microbial communities in different potato niches and soil improvement treatments A:Co-occurrence network based on the ASV level in all treatments;B-D:Distribution statistics of nodes,edges and average degree of bacterial and fungal communities.
Fig. 5 CCA correlation analysis of environmental factors and different microbial communities in different potato niches and soil improvement treatments MA:Soil aggregate;TOC:Organic C;TN:Total;AP:Available P;AK:Available K.
Fig. 6 The effects of soil improvement treatments on the yield of potato per plant and commercial potatoes rate Statistical differences between treatment and control groups were analysed using a Student’s t-test. * indicates significance at P < 0.05,**** indicates highly significance at P < 0.0001.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
陈晓芬, 刘明, 江春玉, 吴萌, 贾仲君, 李忠佩. 2019. 红壤性水稻土不同粒级团聚体有机碳矿化及其温度敏感性. 土壤学报, 56 (5):1118-1127.
|
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.180214 |
董醇波, 张芝元, 韩燕峰, 梁宗琦. 2019. 核心微生物组的研究及利用现状. 菌物学报, 38 (1):1-10.
doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.180214 |
|
[6] |
|
窦森, 李凯, 关松. 2011. 土壤团聚体中有机质研究进展. 土壤学报, 48 (2):412-418.
|
|
[7] |
|
高强, 宓文海, 夏斯琦, 刘明月, 毛伟, 居静, 赵海涛. 2021. 长期不同施肥措施下黄泥田水稻土团聚体组成、稳定性及养分分布特征. 河南农业科学, 50 (6):70-81.
|
|
[8] |
|
龚松玲, 何明凤, 李成伟, 高珍珍, 刘章勇, 朱波. 2021. 水旱轮作种植模式对作物产量及资源利用效率的影响. 安徽农业科学, 49 (4):32-36.
|
|
[9] |
|
胡诚, 刘东海, 陈云峰, 乔艳, 伍德春, 孙斌, 李双来. 2016. 不同土壤改良措施对低产黄泥田土壤性质及水稻产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(3):117-121.
|
|
[10] |
|
栗方亮, 王煌平, 张青, 王秋营, 罗涛. 2015. 稻田施用菌渣土壤团聚体的组成及评价. 生态与农村环境学报, 31 (3):340-345.
|
|
[11] |
|
栗方亮, 张青, 王煌平, 王利民, 王秋营, 罗涛. 2017. 定位施用菌渣对稻田土壤团聚体中碳氮含量的影响. 土壤, 49 (1):70-76.
|
|
[12] |
|
李玉梅, 李建兵, 胡颖慧, 王根林, 孟祥海. 2021. 有机物料对马铃薯生长与土壤物理特性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,(4):104-108.
|
|
[13] |
|
李赟, 刘迪, 范如芹, 刘丽珠, 张振华. 2020. 土壤改良剂的研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 48 (10):63-69.
|
|
[14] |
|
刘菊, 金黎平, 徐建飞. 2021. 温度影响马铃薯块茎形成的研究进展. 中国马铃薯, 35 (1):59-67.
|
|
[15] |
|
吕睿, 常帆, 张兴昌, 雷霁, 房妮, 甄丽莎. 2022. 黄土高原土壤细菌和真菌群落结构及其多样性对菌糠有机肥响应机制研究. 环境生态学, 4 (Z1):40-49.
|
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
万磊, 肖锋, 陈文, 唐炳. 2021. 羊粪对马铃薯产量和经济效益的影响. 农业技术与装备,(7):74-75.
|
|
[20] |
|
吴多基, 姚冬辉, 魏宗强, 吴建富. 2020. 化肥配施土壤调理剂对酸化红壤性水稻土改良效果研究. 江西农业大学学报, 42 (6):1277-1284.
|
|
[21] |
|
谢永贤. 2017. 不同培肥措施对土壤养分及马铃薯产量的影响. 中国马铃薯, 31 (1):25-29.
|
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
许灵杰, 王廷清, 袁黔华, 杨双剑. 2017. 增施蘑菇渣与稻壳粉对土壤微生物及烤烟生长发育的影响. 贵州农业科学, 45 (6):87-90.
|
|
[24] |
|
严佳成, 李艳如, 陈让让, 吴洁, 蒋继宏. 2020. 植物内生放线菌研究进展. 生物资源, 42 (1):9-21.
|
|
[25] |
|
颜朗, 张义正, 清源, 方志荣, 赖先军. 2020. 马铃薯全生育期内根际微生物组变化规律. 微生物学报, 60 (2):246-260.
|
|
[26] |
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.202 |
杨雅伦, 郭燕枝, 孙君茂. 2017. 我国马铃薯产业发展现状及未来展望. 中国农业科技导报, 19 (1):29-36.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.202 |
|
[27] |
|
杨正涛, 姚利, 王建中, 张海兰, 单洪涛, 郭兵, 赵自超. 2019. 菌渣配施土壤改良剂对马铃薯产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响. 山东农业科学, 51 (11):97-102.
|
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
张新生, 卢杰, 张新军. 2022. 土壤微生物与植被互作的研究进展. 黑龙江农业科学,(1):88-93.
|
|
[30] |
|
赵文慧, 马垒, 徐基胜, 谭钧, 张佳宝, 赵炳梓. 2020. 秸秆与木本泥炭短期施用对潮土有机质及微生物群落组成和功能的影响. 土壤学报, 57 (1):153-164.
|
|
[31] |
|
[1] | ZHANG Fan, YANG Yang, WANG Hong, ZHANG Xuebing. Improving Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Communities of Peach-Heavy Soils Using Biofertilizers and Organic Fertilizers [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(9): 2089-2104. |
[2] | GONG Xiaoya, LI Xian, ZHOU Xingang, WU Fengzhi. Effect of Rhizosphere Microorganisms Induced by Potato-Onion on Tomato Root-Knot Nematode Disease [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(8): 1913-1926. |
[3] | FAN Guoquan, YU Jiang, GAO Yanling, LI Qingquan, ZHANG Shu, YU Zhenhua. Effects of Sprouting,Cutting and Coating of Potato Seed on the Occurrence of Rhizoctonia solani Disease [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(5): 1151-1161. |
[4] | QIANG Ran, ZHANG Dai, YANG Zhe, CHEN Mingyue, ZHAO Jing, ZHU Jiehua. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens‘L19’on Fusarium oxysporum Inhibition and Plants Growth Promotion in Potato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(4): 875-892. |
[5] | LU Jianzeng, ZHOU Liyan, HUANG Xinyi, WU Fengzhi, GAO Danmei. Effects of Carbon Pool Strength on Plant Growth and Potassium Uptake of Tomato Intercropped with Potato-Onion [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2620-2632. |
[6] | LI Shuang, LIN Yongxin, QIN Junhong, LI Guangcun, JIN Liping, LIU Jiangang, BIAN Chunsong. Research Progress in Potato Nitrogen Diagnosis [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(10): 2449-2468. |
[7] | CHEN Ruhao, MENG Fanye, YANG Manhua, CHEN Jiaru, ZOU Ying, SONG Botao, MA Hui, NIE Bihua. Analysis and Identification of Endogenous Viral Elements in Solanaceous Crop Genome [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(1): 190-202. |
[8] | WANG Rongyan, LI Qing, XU Ling, WANG Qiujie, SONG Yu, MU Changran, TANG Wei, HAO Dahai. Genetic Analysis of Chloroplast Genome Characteristics of Potato‘Cooperation 88’Selfing Population [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(8): 1649-1663. |
[9] | WANG Xiaofang, XIA Qun, LUAN Risheng, XU Li, YIN Chengmiao, WANG Yanfang, CHEN Xuesen, MAO Zhiquan, XIANG Kun. Inhibition of Tagetes erecta Straw Powder on the Main Pathogens of Apple Continuous Cropping Obstacle and Its Field Application Effect [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1518-1534. |
[10] | GONG Danmin, CAI Linzhi, DING Ren, MA Yanyan, WANG Wanxin, XIONG Xingyao, HU Xinxi. Effects of Different Potassium Fertilizers on Growth and Absorption and Accumulation of Mineral Elements and Cadmium in Potato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1332-1342. |
[11] | TAN Jie, LIU Jiangang, LIU Ju, JIAN Yinqiao, LI Guangcun, JIN Liping, XU Jianfei. Cultivated Substrates Evaluation for in-situ Observation of Potato Tubers Using Computed Tomography [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(5): 1085-1094. |
[12] | YIN Jian, ZHU Xijian, WU Yaoyao, LI Canhui, ZHANG Jinzhe. Targets Prediction and Function Analysis of Potato miR319 Gene Family [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(3): 583-595. |
[13] | HUANG Rong, DONG Chao, JIANG Jiao, QIN Yi, LIU Yanlin, SONG Yuyang. Investigation of the Effect of Rain-shelter Cultivation on the Microbial Diversity of Berry Surface for‘Cabernet Sauvignon’Grapes [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(3): 635-646. |
[14] | XIONG Wenwen, LIU Huimin, CHEN Kaiyuan, DU Juan, SONG Botao, JING Shenglin. Optimization of Gene Editing System Based on Heat-treated CRISPR/Cas9 Potato Plants [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(12): 2591-2600. |
[15] | YANG Jiangwei, DUAN Xiaoqin, ZHANG Feiyan, ZHANG Li, DENG Yurong, WANG Xiaofeng, ZHENG Zhiyong, ZHANG Ning, SI Huaijun. Root Architecture Alteration by Down-regulation of the StIAA22 Gene Using Artificial MicroRNA in Potato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(10): 2091-2103. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd