https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner1.jpg|#|苹果
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner2.jpg|#|甘蓝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner3.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner4.jpg|#|灵芝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner5.jpg|#|桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner6.jpg|#|黄瓜
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner7.jpg|#|蝴蝶兰
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner8.jpg|#|樱桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner9.jpg|#|观赏荷花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner10.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner11.jpg|#|月季
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner12.jpg|#|菊花

园艺学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (9): 2300-2316.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0834

• 遗传育种·种质资源·分子生物学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于叶片微观结构的杏种质资源抗旱性评价

李佳龙1,2, 栾希芸1,2, 唐章虎3, 韩爱芝4, 郭玲1,2,*()   

  1. 1 塔里木大学园艺与林学学院, 新疆阿拉尔 843300
    2 南疆设施农业兵团重点实验室, 新疆阿拉尔 843300
    3 新疆农业科学院轮台果树资源圃, 新疆轮台 841600
    4 塔里木大学分析测试中心, 新疆阿拉尔 843300
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-08 修回日期:2025-07-16 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-09-24
  • 通讯作者:
    * E-mail:
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32160694); 国家自然科学基金项目(31760560)

Drought Resistance Evaluation of Apricot Germplasm Resources Based on Leaf Microstructure

LI Jialong1,2, LUAN Xiyun1,2, TANG Zhanghu3, HAN Aizhi4, GUO Ling1,2,*()   

  1. 1 College of Faculty of Horticulture and ForestryTarim University,Alar, Xinjiang 843300, China
    2 South Xinjiang Facility Agriculture Corps Key LaboratoryAlar, Xinjiang 843300, China
    3 Luntai Fruit Tree Resource Nursery of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesLuntai, Xinjiang 841600, China
    4 Instrumental Analysis Center of Tarim UniversityAlar, Xinjiang 843300, China
  • Received:2024-12-08 Revised:2025-07-16 Published:2025-09-25 Online:2025-09-24

摘要:

采用石蜡切片法和指甲油印迹法,对中亚生态群和华北生态群共96份杏种质的叶片解剖结构及气孔形态特征进行观测,通过相关性分析及主成分分析筛选出反映抗旱性的叶片主要指标,并利用隶属函数综合评价不同生态群种质的抗旱性。研究表明:96份杏种质叶片均为异面叶,肾型气孔不均匀分布于叶片下表皮,其中‘卡拉胡安娜’‘奎皮克曼’‘甜仁杏’3份种质叶片上表皮也存在气孔分布,然而,这些气孔形态小,数量少;筛选出叶片厚度、气孔长度、栅栏组织厚度、气孔宽度、气孔面积、上表皮细胞厚度和上表皮细胞宽度作为96份种质的有效抗旱性评价指标;抗旱性最强的种质为‘索格佳娜丽’,最弱的为‘叶城紫杏’。2个生态类群杏种质的叶片微观结构及各种质间抗旱性具有明显的差异,鉴定筛选出‘索格佳娜丽’‘元旦杏’‘黄洪待克’等9份抗旱性极强的种质,可以作为杏抗旱育种的优异材料加以利用。

关键词: 杏, 生态群, 叶片解剖结构, 气孔特征, 隶属函数, 抗旱性评价

Abstract:

The leaf anatomical structure and stomata morphological characteristics of 96 apricot from Central Asia ecogroup and North China ecogroup were observed by paraffin section and nail polish blotting. Furthermore,leaf typicality indexes that reflecting the drought resistance of apricot germplasm were screened by using correlation analysis and principal component analysis,and the drought resistance of germplasms from different ecological groups were comprehensively evaluated by using the affiliation function. The study showed that:the 96 apricot germplasm leaves are all typical bifacial leaf. In the meantime,the stomata are renal-type stomata,and unevenly distributed in the lower epidermis of the leaves,included among which 3 germplasm leaves of‘Kala Huanna’‘Kuipikeman’and‘Tianrenxing’ also had stomatal existed in the upper epidermis. However,the size of the stomata are small and their number are also relatively few. Leaf thickness,stomatal length,thickness of palisade tissue,stomatal width,stomatal area,upper epidermal cell thickness,upper epidermal cell width are screened out as the effective drought resistance evaluation indexes of 96 germplasm. It is demonstrated that the strongest germplasm for drought-resistant is‘Suogejia’nali’and the weakest is‘Yechengzixing’. And 2 ecological groups had obvious differences in leaf microstructure and drought resistance among apricot germplasm,9 germplasm with very strong drought resistance,such as‘Suogejia’nali’‘Yuandanxing’and‘Huanghongdaike’,are eventually screened and can be utilized as excellent materials for drought- resistant breeding of apricot.

Key words: apricot, ecological groups, anatomical structure, stoma characteristic, the method of affiliation functions, drought resistance evaluation