园艺学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (7): 1491-1504.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0436
闫文渊, 秦军红, 段绍光, 徐建飞, 简银巧, 金黎平, 李广存()
收稿日期:
2022-03-04
修回日期:
2022-04-06
出版日期:
2022-07-25
发布日期:
2022-07-29
基金资助:
YAN Wenyuan, QIN Junhong, DUAN Shaoguang, XU Jianfei, JIAN Yinqiao, JIN Liping, LI Guangcun()
Received:
2022-03-04
Revised:
2022-04-06
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-07-29
摘要:
采用抗旱棚盆栽试验,以‘中薯18号’‘中薯28号’为材料,设定3种施氮与灌溉水平(低氮、中氮、高氮;水分亏缺、水分正常、水分过量),研究不同水氮处理对株高、块茎形成、光合特性、块茎质量和品质的影响,筛选最佳水氮组合。结果表明,不同水分处理下,低氮促进了匍匐茎次顶端膨大,使块茎形成期提前,但最终未能形成高产。正常和过量水分下,两品种叶片气孔导度、净光合速率、叶绿素相对含量、株高均随着施氮量的增加而增加。同一水分处理下,地下部(地下茎和根)鲜质量、茎和叶的鲜质量均随施氮量的增加而增加。两品种在水分正常高氮处理下单株块茎质量为711.1 g、637.2 g,且此处理下两品种的净光合速率、产量水分利用效率、块茎淀粉与粗蛋白含量均达到最高水平。因此,马铃薯生育期宜采用水分正常高氮处理。
中图分类号:
闫文渊, 秦军红, 段绍光, 徐建飞, 简银巧, 金黎平, 李广存. 水氮耦合对马铃薯光合特性、块茎形成和品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(7): 1491-1504.
YAN Wenyuan, QIN Junhong, DUAN Shaoguang, XU Jianfei, JIAN Yinqiao, JIN Liping, LI Guangcun. The Effect of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Potato Photosynthesis,Tuber Formation and Quality[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7): 1491-1504.
处理 Treatment | 水平 Level | 苗期 Seedling period | 块茎形成期 Tuber formation period | 块茎膨大期 Tuber swelling period | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素/g | 低 Insufficient | 2.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urea | 中Normal | 4.67 | 1.33 | 0.67 | 0 |
高 Excessive | 7.78 | 2.22 | 1.11 | 0 | |
水分/% | 亏缺 Insufficient | 35 ~ 45 | 45 ~ 55 | 50 ~ 60 | 30 ~ 40 |
Moisture | 正常 Normal | 55 ~ 65 | 65 ~ 75 | 70 ~ 80 | 50 ~ 60 |
过量 Excessive | 75 ~ 85 | 85 ~ 95 | 90 ~ 100 | 70 ~ 80 |
表1 土壤施氮量和相对含水量设计
Table 1 Soil nitrogen application rate and relative water content design
处理 Treatment | 水平 Level | 苗期 Seedling period | 块茎形成期 Tuber formation period | 块茎膨大期 Tuber swelling period | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素/g | 低 Insufficient | 2.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urea | 中Normal | 4.67 | 1.33 | 0.67 | 0 |
高 Excessive | 7.78 | 2.22 | 1.11 | 0 | |
水分/% | 亏缺 Insufficient | 35 ~ 45 | 45 ~ 55 | 50 ~ 60 | 30 ~ 40 |
Moisture | 正常 Normal | 55 ~ 65 | 65 ~ 75 | 70 ~ 80 | 50 ~ 60 |
过量 Excessive | 75 ~ 85 | 85 ~ 95 | 90 ~ 100 | 70 ~ 80 |
图1 水氮处理对‘中薯18号’和‘中薯28号’匍匐茎的影响(出苗后30 d)
Fig. 1 Effects of water and nitrogen treatment on the Zhongshu 18 and Zhongshu 28 potato stolon(30 days after seedling)
品种 Variety | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮素处理 Nitrogen treatment | 单株块茎数 Number of tubers per plant | 单株匍匐茎数 Number of stolons per plant | 匍匐茎长度/ (cm · plant-1) Stolon length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.3 ± 2.1 a | 9.0 ± 4.0 a | 3.7 ± 3.5 cd |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 11.3 ± 2.1 a | 3.3 ± 2.2 d | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 8.7 ± 3.8 a | 3.6 ± 2.7 d | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.0 ± 2.6 a | 12.0 ± 2.0 a | 5.7 ± 4.8 bc | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 12.3 ± 6.7 a | 7.7 ± 4.1 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 14.0 ± 6.0 a | 5.3 ± 3.1 bcd | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.6 ± 2.3 a | 14.7 ± 3.1 a | 4.6 ± 3.2 bcd | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 1.7 ± 2.1 a | 9.3 ± 4.7 a | 6.4 ± 4.6 ab | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 13.7 ± 1.5 a | 6.2 ± 5.5 ab | ||
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.3 ± 0.5 a | 10.7 ± 4.7 a | 4.5 ± 2.7 b |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 1.0 ± 1.7 a | 5.3 ± 3.1 a | 2.7 ± 1.8 b | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.7 ± 1.2 a | 5.3 ± 1.5 a | 3.3 ± 1.9 b | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.7 ± 0.6 a | 9.0 ± 2.0 a | 4.6 ± 2.8 b | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 0.3 ± 0.6 a | 4.7 ± 0.6 a | 4.5 ± 3.3 b | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 9.3 ± 7.1 a | 3.7 ± 3.3 b | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.0 ± 1.0 a | 11.3 ± 3.5 a | 4.1 ± 2.9 b | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 3.0 ± 2.6 a | 11.3 ± 4.5 a | 6.3 ± 3.3 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 2.3 ± 4.0 a | 9.0 ± 5.6 a | 3.7 ± 2.8 b |
表2 水氮处理对马铃薯匍匐茎的影响(出苗后30 d)
Table 2 Effects of water and nitrogen treatment on the potato stolon(30 days after seedling)
品种 Variety | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮素处理 Nitrogen treatment | 单株块茎数 Number of tubers per plant | 单株匍匐茎数 Number of stolons per plant | 匍匐茎长度/ (cm · plant-1) Stolon length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.3 ± 2.1 a | 9.0 ± 4.0 a | 3.7 ± 3.5 cd |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 11.3 ± 2.1 a | 3.3 ± 2.2 d | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 8.7 ± 3.8 a | 3.6 ± 2.7 d | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.0 ± 2.6 a | 12.0 ± 2.0 a | 5.7 ± 4.8 bc | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 12.3 ± 6.7 a | 7.7 ± 4.1 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 14.0 ± 6.0 a | 5.3 ± 3.1 bcd | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.6 ± 2.3 a | 14.7 ± 3.1 a | 4.6 ± 3.2 bcd | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 1.7 ± 2.1 a | 9.3 ± 4.7 a | 6.4 ± 4.6 ab | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 13.7 ± 1.5 a | 6.2 ± 5.5 ab | ||
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.3 ± 0.5 a | 10.7 ± 4.7 a | 4.5 ± 2.7 b |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 1.0 ± 1.7 a | 5.3 ± 3.1 a | 2.7 ± 1.8 b | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.7 ± 1.2 a | 5.3 ± 1.5 a | 3.3 ± 1.9 b | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.7 ± 0.6 a | 9.0 ± 2.0 a | 4.6 ± 2.8 b | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 0.3 ± 0.6 a | 4.7 ± 0.6 a | 4.5 ± 3.3 b | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 9.3 ± 7.1 a | 3.7 ± 3.3 b | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.0 ± 1.0 a | 11.3 ± 3.5 a | 4.1 ± 2.9 b | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 3.0 ± 2.6 a | 11.3 ± 4.5 a | 6.3 ± 3.3 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 2.3 ± 4.0 a | 9.0 ± 5.6 a | 3.7 ± 2.8 b |
品种 Variety | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮素处理 Nitrogen treatment | 块茎数 Number of tuber | 块茎质量/g Tuber weight | 产量水分利用效率/ (kg · m-3) Yield water use efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.8 ± 1.6 de | 345.6 ± 84.7 d | 13.9 ± 3.4 c |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 6.4 ± 1.5 abc | 434.4 ± 70.7 c | 18.0 ± 3.0 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.0 ± 1.9 abc | 456.7 ± 72.5 c | 16.3 ± 2.6 ab | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.8 ± 1.1 e | 348.9 ± 49.1 d | 10.4 ± 1.5 d | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 8.6 ± 2.1 ab | 618.9 ± 38.3 b | 14.5 ± 0.9 bc | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.4 ± 4.1 abc | 711.1 ± 116.6 a | 17.2 ± 2.8 a | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 5.3 ± 1.4 cd | 501.1 ± 103.9 c | 11.0 ± 2.3 d | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 6.3 ± 2.3 bc | 713.3 ± 84.0 a | 14.3 ± 1.7 bc | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 8.7 ± 1.9 a | 775.6 ± 84.7 a | 14.7 ± 1.6 bc | ||
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 4.2 ± 1.0 cd | 335.6 ± 91.7 f | 13.5 ± 3.7 a |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 6.1 ± 2.5 abc | 372.3 ± 103.6 f | 15.4 ± 4.3 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.0 ± 3.0 ab | 417.8 ± 158.3 ef | 15.0 ± 5.7 a | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.6 ± 1.1 d | 490.0 ± 84.9 de | 15.0 ± 2.5 a | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 4.9 ± 2.2 bcd | 633.4 ± 66.9 bc | 14.8 ± 1.6 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 6.4 ± 3.3 abc | 637.2 ± 101.7 bc | 14.2 ± 3.2 a | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 5.2 ± 2.4 abcd | 566.7 ± 89.0 cd | 12.3 ± 2.0 a | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 4.1 ± 1.2 cd | 730.0 ± 85.3 ab | 14.6 ± 1.7 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.4 ± 2.6 a | 796.2 ± 170.4 a | 14.4 ± 3.6 a |
表3 水氮处理对马铃薯单株块茎质量的影响(出苗后99 d)
Table 3 Effects of water and nitrogen treatment on the tuber weight per plant(99 days after seedling)
品种 Variety | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮素处理 Nitrogen treatment | 块茎数 Number of tuber | 块茎质量/g Tuber weight | 产量水分利用效率/ (kg · m-3) Yield water use efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.8 ± 1.6 de | 345.6 ± 84.7 d | 13.9 ± 3.4 c |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 6.4 ± 1.5 abc | 434.4 ± 70.7 c | 18.0 ± 3.0 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.0 ± 1.9 abc | 456.7 ± 72.5 c | 16.3 ± 2.6 ab | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 2.8 ± 1.1 e | 348.9 ± 49.1 d | 10.4 ± 1.5 d | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 8.6 ± 2.1 ab | 618.9 ± 38.3 b | 14.5 ± 0.9 bc | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.4 ± 4.1 abc | 711.1 ± 116.6 a | 17.2 ± 2.8 a | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 5.3 ± 1.4 cd | 501.1 ± 103.9 c | 11.0 ± 2.3 d | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 6.3 ± 2.3 bc | 713.3 ± 84.0 a | 14.3 ± 1.7 bc | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 8.7 ± 1.9 a | 775.6 ± 84.7 a | 14.7 ± 1.6 bc | ||
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28 | 亏缺 Insufficient irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 4.2 ± 1.0 cd | 335.6 ± 91.7 f | 13.5 ± 3.7 a |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 6.1 ± 2.5 abc | 372.3 ± 103.6 f | 15.4 ± 4.3 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.0 ± 3.0 ab | 417.8 ± 158.3 ef | 15.0 ± 5.7 a | ||
正常 Normal irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 3.6 ± 1.1 d | 490.0 ± 84.9 de | 15.0 ± 2.5 a | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 4.9 ± 2.2 bcd | 633.4 ± 66.9 bc | 14.8 ± 1.6 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 6.4 ± 3.3 abc | 637.2 ± 101.7 bc | 14.2 ± 3.2 a | ||
过量 Excessive irrigation | 低氮Insufficient nitrogen application | 5.2 ± 2.4 abcd | 566.7 ± 89.0 cd | 12.3 ± 2.0 a | |
中氮Normal nitrogen application | 4.1 ± 1.2 cd | 730.0 ± 85.3 ab | 14.6 ± 1.7 a | ||
高氮Excessive nitrogen application | 7.4 ± 2.6 a | 796.2 ± 170.4 a | 14.4 ± 3.6 a |
品种 Variety | 回归方程 Regression equation | R2 | P |
---|---|---|---|
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | Y = 23.157 + 3604.530W + 64.937N-6815.557W2-5.926N2 + 1087.906WN | 0.772 | 0.0001 |
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28 | Y =-125.872 + 16270.695W + 34.617N-69063.916W2-3.016N2 + 316.745WN | 0.618 | 0.0001 |
表4 水氮投入量与块茎质量的回归关系
Table 4 Regression relationship between input of water and nitrogen on tuber weight
品种 Variety | 回归方程 Regression equation | R2 | P |
---|---|---|---|
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | Y = 23.157 + 3604.530W + 64.937N-6815.557W2-5.926N2 + 1087.906WN | 0.772 | 0.0001 |
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28 | Y =-125.872 + 16270.695W + 34.617N-69063.916W2-3.016N2 + 316.745WN | 0.618 | 0.0001 |
指标 Index | 中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | 中薯28号Zhongshu 28 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
灌水量 Irrigation | 施氮量 Nitrogen | 灌水量 Irrigation | 施氮量 Nitrogen | |
块茎质量 Tuber weight | 0.748** | 0.590** | 0.768** | 0.281* |
块茎数 Number of tubers | 0.323** | 0.550** | 0.208 | 0.427** |
产量水分利用效率 Yield water use efficiency | -0.199 | 0.545** | -0.068 | 0.130 |
叶绿素相对含量 Chlorophyll relative content | 0.079 | 0.674** | 0.290 | 0.644** |
净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate | 0.149 | 0.548** | 0.436 | 0.301 |
叶鲜质量 Leaf fresh weight | 0.427* | 0.613** | 0.454* | 0.748** |
地上茎鲜质量 Stem fresh weight | 0.491* | 0.790** | 0.271 | 0.581** |
地下部鲜质量(不含块茎)Fresh weight of underground part(excluding tuber) | 0.380 | 0.410* | 0.094 | 0.435* |
块茎淀粉含量 Starch content of tuber | 0.037 | 0.549** | 0.091 | 0.588** |
块茎粗蛋白含量 Crude protein content of tuber | -0.117 | 0.652** | 0.042 | 0.682** |
表5 水氮施用量与各指标的相关性
Table 5 Correlation of irrigation volume and nitrogen application rates with the index
指标 Index | 中薯18号 Zhongshu 18 | 中薯28号Zhongshu 28 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
灌水量 Irrigation | 施氮量 Nitrogen | 灌水量 Irrigation | 施氮量 Nitrogen | |
块茎质量 Tuber weight | 0.748** | 0.590** | 0.768** | 0.281* |
块茎数 Number of tubers | 0.323** | 0.550** | 0.208 | 0.427** |
产量水分利用效率 Yield water use efficiency | -0.199 | 0.545** | -0.068 | 0.130 |
叶绿素相对含量 Chlorophyll relative content | 0.079 | 0.674** | 0.290 | 0.644** |
净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate | 0.149 | 0.548** | 0.436 | 0.301 |
叶鲜质量 Leaf fresh weight | 0.427* | 0.613** | 0.454* | 0.748** |
地上茎鲜质量 Stem fresh weight | 0.491* | 0.790** | 0.271 | 0.581** |
地下部鲜质量(不含块茎)Fresh weight of underground part(excluding tuber) | 0.380 | 0.410* | 0.094 | 0.435* |
块茎淀粉含量 Starch content of tuber | 0.037 | 0.549** | 0.091 | 0.588** |
块茎粗蛋白含量 Crude protein content of tuber | -0.117 | 0.652** | 0.042 | 0.682** |
指标Index | 中薯18号Zhongshu 18 | 中薯28号Zhongshu 28 |
---|---|---|
块茎数 Number of tubers | 0.520** | 0.290** |
匍匐茎数 Number of stolons | 0.011 | 0.063 |
叶绿素相对含量 Chlorophyll relative content | 0.142 | 0.276 |
净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate | 0.314 | 0.187 |
叶片鲜质量 Leaf fresh weight | 0.602** | 0.207 |
茎鲜质量 Stem fresh weight | 0.487 | 0.108 |
地下部鲜质量(不含块茎)Fresh weight of underground part(excluding tuber) | 0.307 | 0.002 |
表6 单株块茎质量与其他指标的相关性
Table 6 Correlation of tuber weight per plant with the index
指标Index | 中薯18号Zhongshu 18 | 中薯28号Zhongshu 28 |
---|---|---|
块茎数 Number of tubers | 0.520** | 0.290** |
匍匐茎数 Number of stolons | 0.011 | 0.063 |
叶绿素相对含量 Chlorophyll relative content | 0.142 | 0.276 |
净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate | 0.314 | 0.187 |
叶片鲜质量 Leaf fresh weight | 0.602** | 0.207 |
茎鲜质量 Stem fresh weight | 0.487 | 0.108 |
地下部鲜质量(不含块茎)Fresh weight of underground part(excluding tuber) | 0.307 | 0.002 |
[1] |
Asadi M, Eshghizadeh H R. 2021. Response of sorghum genotypes to water deficit stress under different CO2and nitrogen levels. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 158:255-264.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.010 URL |
[2] |
Agrawal L, Chakraborty S, Jaiswal D K. 2008. Comparative proteomics of tuber induction,development and maturation reveal the complexity of tuberization process in potato(Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Proteome Research, 7 (9):3803-3817.
doi: 10.1021/pr8000755 pmid: 18672926 |
[3] |
Bohman B J, Rosen C J, Mulla D J. 2020. Impact of variable rate nitrogen and reduced irrigation management on nitrate leaching for potato. Journal of Environmental Quality, 49 (2):281-291.
doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20028 pmid: 33016433 |
[4] |
Bunce J. 2019. Consistent differences in field leaf water-use efficiency among soybean cultivars. Plants, 8 (5):123.
doi: 10.3390/plants8050123 URL |
[5] |
Chen Y, Li C, Yi J, Yang Y, Lei C, Gong M. 2019. Transcriptome response to drought,rehydration and re-dehydration in potato. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21 (1):159.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21010159 URL |
[6] | da Ros L, Elferjani R, Soolanayakanahally R, Kagale S, Pahari S, Kulkarni M, Wahab J, Bizimungu B. 2020. Drought-induced regulatory cascades and their effects on the nutritional quality of developing potato tubers. Genes(Basel), 11 (8):864. |
[7] | Eid M A M, Abdel-Salam A A, Salem H M, Mahrous S E, Seleiman M F, Alsadon A A, Solieman T H I, Ibrahim A A. 2020. Interaction effects of nitrogen source and irrigation regime on tuber quality,yield,and water use efficiency of Solanum tuberosum L. Plants(Basel), 9 (1):110. |
[8] |
Goffart J P, Olivier M, Frankinet M. 2008. Potato crop nitrogen status assessment to improve N fertilization management and efficiency: past-present-future. Potato Research, 51 (3):355-383.
doi: 10.1007/s11540-008-9118-x URL |
[9] |
Guo K, Bian X, Jia Z, Zhang L, Wei C. 2020. Effects of nitrogen level on structural and functional properties of starches from different colored-fleshed root tubers of sweet potato. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 164:3235-3242.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.199 pmid: 32861781 |
[10] | Hu Xin-xi, Feng Yan-qing, Lei Yan. 2015. Effects of nitrogen rate on plant growth of autumn potato crop and gene expression of nitrate reductase and ammonium transporter. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 42 (10):1974-1982. (in Chinese) |
胡新喜, 冯艳青, 雷艳. 2015. 不同施氮水平下秋马铃薯的生长以及StNR和StAT的表达. 园艺学报, 42 (10):1974-1982. | |
[11] |
Ierna A, Pandino G, Lombardo S, Mauromicale G. 2011. Tuber yield,water and fertilizer productivity in early potato as affected by a combination of irrigation and fertilization. Agriculture Water Manage, 101 (1):35-41.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.024 URL |
[12] | Kahsay W S, Tejada Moral M. 2019. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on potatoes production in Ethiopia:a review. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5 (1):2-5. |
[13] |
Kondhare K R, Malankar N N, Devani R S, Banerjee A K. 2018. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals small RNA profiles involved in early stages of stolon-to-tuber transitions in potato under photoperiodic conditions. BMC Plant Biology, 18 (1):284.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1501-4 URL |
[14] |
Li W, Xiong B, Wang S, Deng X, Yin L, Li H. 2016. Regulation effects of water and nitrogen on the source-sink relationship in potato during the tuber bulking stage. PLoS ONE, 11 (1):e0146877.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146877 URL |
[15] | Li Y, Cui S, Zhang Z, Zhuang K, Wang Z, Zhang Q. 2020. Determining effects of water and nitrogen input on maize(Zea mays)yield,water-and nitrogen-use efficiency:a global synthesis. Scientific Report, 10 (1):96-99. |
[16] |
Meise P, Jozefowicz A M, Uptmoor R, Mock H P, Ordon F, Schum A. 2017. Comparative shoot proteome analysis of two potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)genotypes contrasting in nitrogen deficiency responses in vitro. Journal of Proteomics, 166:68-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.07.010 URL |
[17] | Meng Li-li. 2020. Stem formation mechanism of horseshoe tuber and its response to variety and nitrogen[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Inner Mongolia:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University. (in Chinese) |
孟丽丽. 2020. 马铃块茎茎形成机制及其对品种与氮素的响应[博士论文]. 内蒙古: 内蒙古农业大学. | |
[18] |
Mu X, Chen Y. 2021. The physiological response of photosynthesis to nitrogen deficiency. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 158:76-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.019 URL |
[19] | Ruchika, Csintalan Z, Péli E R. 2020. Effect of salicylic acid pre-treatment after long-term desiccation in the moss Syntrichia ruralis(Hedw.) Web. and Mohr. Plants(Basel), 9 (9):1097. |
[20] | Serio F, Elia A, Signore A, Santamaria P. 2010. Influence of nitrogen form on yield and nitrate content of subirrigated early potato. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 84 (11):1428-1432. |
[21] | Song Jin-xin, Gu Yan, Yu Han, Ning Xi-lin, Wu Chun-sheng, Hu Wen-he. 2019. Effects of plastic film mulching and nitrogen application rate on growth and yield of maize under drip irrigation. Molecular Plant Breeding, 17 (21):7251-7255. (in Chinese) |
宋金鑫, 谷岩, 于寒, 宁夕琳, 吴春胜, 胡文河. 2019. 覆膜和氮肥施用量对滴灌玉米生长发育及产量的影响. 分子植物育种, 17 (21):7251-7255. | |
[22] |
Song Y, Li J, Liu M, Meng Z, Liu K, Sui N. 2019. Nitrogen increases drought tolerance in maize seedlings. Functional Plant Biology, 46 (4):350-359.
doi: 10.1071/FP18186 URL |
[23] |
Sun N, Wang Y, Gupta S K, Rosen C J. 2020. Potato tuber chemical properties in storage as affected by cultivar and nitrogen rate:implications for acrylamide formation. Foods, 9 (3):352.
doi: 10.3390/foods9030352 URL |
[24] |
Šrek P, Hejcman M, Kunzová E. 2010. Multivariate analysis of relationship between potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)yield,amount of applied elements,their concentrations in tubers and uptake in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Field Crops Research, 118:183-193.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.05.009 URL |
[25] | Tiwari J K, Buckseth T, Zinta R, Saraswati A, Singh R K, Rawat S, Dua V K, Chakrabarti S K. 2020. Transcriptome analysis of potato shoots,roots and stolons under nitrogen stress. Scientfic Report, 10 (1):1152. |
[26] |
Tiwari J K, Plett D, Garnett T, Chakrabarti S K, Singh R K. 2018. Integrated genomics,physiology and breeding approaches for improving nitrogen use efficiency in potato:translating knowledge from other crops. Functional Plant Biology, 45 (6):587-605.
doi: 10.1071/FP17303 URL |
[27] |
van Dingenen J, Hanzalova K, Abd Allah Salem M, Abel C, Seibert T, Giavalisco P, Wahl V. 2019. Limited nitrogen availability has cultivar-dependent effects on potato tuber yield and tuber quality traits. Food Chemistry, 288:170-177.
doi: S0308-8146(19)30445-5 pmid: 30902278 |
[28] | Wang J, Li B R, Li X P. 2016. Evaluation of N fertilizers effects on grape based on the expression of N metabolic genes. Horticultural Plant Journal, 5:25-35. |
[29] | Wu Liang, Zhang Wei-feng, Chen Xin-ping, Cui Zhen-ling, Fan Ming-sheng, Chen Qing, Zhang Fu-suo. 2016. Nitrogen fertilizer input and nitrogen use efficiency in Chinese farmland. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China,(4):76-83. (in Chinese) |
武良, 张卫峰, 陈新平, 崔振岭, 范明生, 陈清, 张福锁. 2016. 中国农田氮肥投入和生产效率. 中国土壤与肥料,(4):76-83. | |
[30] | Xu Guo-chang. 1997. Climate change in arid and semi-arid areas of China. Beijing: Meteorological Press. (in Chinese) |
徐国昌. 1997. 中国干旱半干旱区气候变化. 北京: 气象出版社. | |
[31] | Yan Xiao-yuan, Xia Long-long, Ti Chao-pu. 2018. Win-win nitrogen management practices for improving crop yield and environmental sustainability. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 (2):177-183. (in Chinese) |
颜晓元, 夏龙龙, 遆超普. 2018. 面向作物产量和环境双赢的氮肥施用策略. 中国科学院院刊, 33 (2):177-183. | |
[32] | Yao Chun-xia. 2012. Changes of water absorption capacity of maize roots under drought stress and rehydration conditions[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University. (in Chinese) |
姚春霞. 2012. 干旱胁迫及复水条件下玉米根系吸水能力的变化[博士论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学. | |
[33] | Yu Bang-qiang, Wu Lin-ke, Zhang Guo-hui, Jie Rui-xia, Wang Shou-liang. 2019. Effects of drip irrigation on the growth and development of potato. Water Saving Irrigation,(8):64-67. (in Chinese) |
余帮强, 吴林科, 张国辉, 颉瑞霞, 王收良. 2019. 膜下滴灌条件下不同补水量对主食化马铃薯生长发育的影响. 节水灌溉,(8):64-67. | |
[34] |
Yu Bin, Yang Hong-yu, Wang Li, Liu Yu-hui, Bai Jiang-ping, Wang Di, Zhang Jun-lian. 2018. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits of potato germplasm resources in arid and semi-arid regions. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 44 (1):63-74. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00063 URL |
余斌, 杨宏羽, 王丽, 刘玉汇, 白江平, 王蒂, 张俊莲. 2018. 引进马铃薯种质资源在干旱半干旱区的表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 作物学报, 44 (1):63-74. | |
[35] |
Zebarth B J, Rosen C J. 2007. Research perspective on nitrogen BMP development for potato. American Journal of Potato Research, 84 (1):3-18.
doi: 10.1007/BF02986294 URL |
[36] |
Zhang H, Liu X, Song B, Nie B, Wei Zhang, Zhao Z. 2020b. Effect of excessive nitrogen on levels of amino acids and sugars,and differential response to post-harvest cold storage in potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)tubers. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 157:38-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.09.040 URL |
[37] |
Zhang Z, Tariq A, Zeng F, Graciano C, Zhang B. 2020a. Nitrogen application mitigates drought-induced metabolic changes in Alhagi sparsifolia seedlings by regulating nutrient and biomass allocation patterns. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 155:828-841.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.036 URL |
[38] | Zierer W, Rüscher D, Sonnewald U, Sonnewald S. 2021. Tuber and tuberous root development. Annual Review Plant Biology, 72 (1):5-12. |
[1] | 王 宽, 祁利潘, 吴桂丽, 冯 琰, 王 磊, 尹 江, 罗亚婷, 王 燕, 刘 畅, 龚学臣, 王海军. 中早熟马铃薯新品种‘北方002’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 141-142. |
[2] | 祁利潘, 冯 琰, 王 磊, 尹 江, 王 宽, 罗亚婷, 龚学臣, 刘 畅, 王 燕. 马铃薯新品种‘北方004’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 143-144. |
[3] | 李燕山, 隋启君, 蒋 伟, 杨琼芬, 白建明. 鲜食、淀粉兼用型马铃薯新品种‘云薯113’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 145-146. |
[4] | 邹 雪, 丁 凡, 刘丽芳, 余韩开宗, 陈年伟, 饶莉萍. 紫色马铃薯新品种‘绵紫芋1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 93-94. |
[5] | 祁利潘, 李越, 王磊, 冯琰, 王宽, 尹江, 郭华春. 马铃薯与枸杞嫁接愈合过程的解剖学观察[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 868-874. |
[6] | 杨妮, 万绮雯, 李逸民, 韩妙华, 滕瑞敏, 刘洁霞, 庄静. 外源亚精胺对盐胁迫下茶树光合特性及关键酶基因表达的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(2): 378-394. |
[7] | 叶广继, 郑贞贞, 纳添仓, 王舰. 马铃薯资源糖苷生物碱含量评价及合成相关基因表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(11): 2357-2366. |
[8] | 罗红玉, 杨江伟, 冯亚, 张欢欢, 刘升燕, 张宁, 司怀军. STTM技术沉默马铃薯Stu-miR156对其侧根发育的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(3): 531-538. |
[9] | 宋玉浩, 史伟玲, 张娇, 丁振宇, 彭洪娴, 蒋春燕, 马秋芹, 李芝静, 赵勇, 唐道彬, 张凯, 王季春, 刘勋. 马铃薯块茎淀粉组分高效检测体系的建立及应用[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(3): 600-608. |
[10] | 刘程, 王世尧, 史伟玲, 宋玉浩, 蒋锐, 赵勇, 莫世春, 吕典秋, 王季春, 刘勋. 马铃薯抗晚疫病基因R8、RB和抗病毒病基因Rx1、Ryadg的多重PCR检测[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(2): 389-396. |
[11] | 许国春, 罗文彬, 李华伟, 许泳清, 纪荣昌, 张鸿, 邱思鑫, 汤浩. 马铃薯叶片光合效率遗传变异分析及高光效种质筛选[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(11): 2239-2250. |
[12] | 李佩华, 彭正松, 夏明忠, 蔡光泽, 袁颖, 方志荣, 曲继鹏, 清源. 高产、抗病、广适马铃薯新品种‘西芋3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(10): 2115-2116. |
[13] | 荐红举, 万梦圆, 付毅, 丁艺, 琚熙三, 尚丽娜, 李辉, 王季春, 胡柏耿, 吕典秋. 马铃薯CHI家族基因鉴定及其对外源水杨酸和茉莉酸的响应分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(1): 83-95. |
[14] | 梁静思, 祝菊澧, 徐 裴, 张 佩, 李灿辉, 唐 唯, . 植原体及马铃薯相关病害研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(9): 1777-1792. |
[15] | 邵美妮1,郝 鑫2,崔 娜1,曲 波1,关 萍1,贾伟康1,许玉凤1,*. 蓝叶类型玉簪叶片表皮蜡质对光合生理的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(7): 1401-1411. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司