芋组培苗移栽驯化期的光合特性

园艺学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 518-520.

芋组培苗移栽驯化期的光合特性

柏新富;蒋小满;朱建军;梁建光

(烟台师范学院生命科学学院, 烟台264025)

收稿日期:2004-08-06 修回日期:2004-10-08 出版日期:2005-06-25 发布日期:2005-06-25

Studies on the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Taro Test-tube Plantlets after Transplantation

Bai Xinfu;Jiang Xiaoman;Zhu Jianjun;Liang Jianguang

(School of Life Science, Yantai Normal University, Yantai 264025, China)

Received:2004-08-06 Revised:2004-10-08 Online:2005-06-25 Published:2005-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对芋组培苗在移栽驯化过程中的生理指标进行了测定, 结果表明: 其叶片叶绿素含量、表观量子产额、羧化效率、净光合速率随驯化时间的延长逐渐增加, 而蒸腾速率和气孔导度则呈下降趋势, 说明移栽驯化可以增强组培苗对环境的适应能力和自养能力。

关键词: 芋, 组培苗, 光合速率, 蒸腾速率, 量子产额, 羧化效率

Abstract: The photosynthetic characteristics in taro test-tube plantlets during transplantation and acclimation were measured and analyzed with a TPS-1 photosynthetic system. The results showed that the apparentquantum yield, net photosynthetic rate and carboxylation efficiency of the plantlets increased but the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance decreased during the acclimation after transplantation. The chlorophyll content in leaves of the plantlets also increased substantially. These results indicated that acclimation could greatly improve the capabilities of the plantlets to adapt to natural environment, and enhance their autotrophy.

Key words: Taro, Test-tube plantlet, Photosynthetic rate, Transpiration rate, Quantum yield, Carboxylation efficiency

中图分类号:

S 632.3

柏新富;蒋小满;朱建军;梁建光. 芋组培苗移栽驯化期的光合特性[J]. 园艺学报, 2005, 32(3): 518-520.

Bai Xinfu;Jiang Xiaoman;Zhu Jianjun;Liang Jianguang. Studies on the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Taro Test-tube Plantlets after Transplantation[J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2005, 32(3): 518-520.

[1]	李勇军, 李维祥, 熊正伟, 汪义华, 丁铭, . 珠芽类魔芋新品种‘兴迈4号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 95-96.
[2]	张婉青, 张红晓, 廉小芳, 李昱莹, 郭丽丽, 侯小改. ‘凤丹’牡丹愈伤组织分化和生根诱导中的DNA甲基化分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(8): 1735-1746.
[3]	刘金梅, 徐晔春, 钟荣辉, 尤毅, 李冬梅, 叶远俊. 花叶芋新品种‘碧血丹心’与‘粉红佳人’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(8): 1839-1840.
[4]	刘明秀, 王泓丁, 张宇娜, 张帮燕, 刘松, 李韵佳, 党江波, 何桥, 梁国鲁, 郭启高. 三倍体枇杷与其四倍体和二倍体亲本光系统活性差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(1): 37-48.
[5]	张宇, 门果桃, 兰开龙, 赵举. 菊芋新品种‘蒙芋1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 3001-3002.
[6]	赵孟良, 钟启文, 李莉, 田闵玉. 菊芋新品种‘青芋5号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 3003-3004.
[7]	刘星月, 朱强龙, 李慧英, 孙静宇, 李必聪, 张宏玉, 黄英金, 方加军, 周庆红, . 红芽芋脱毒试管芋诱导及植株再生[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(12): 2427-2438.
[8]	吴学尉1，李梅1,，郑莉1,，袁丽梅2，刘丹丹1，叶辉1，吴治成3，张乙盛4. 珠芽类魔芋新品种‘临芋1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(S2): 2815-2816.
[9]	方霞1，柏志靓1，周生财2，张丽珍2，吴强2，张俊红1，童再康1,*. 大叶桢楠和小叶桢楠光合生理特性比较[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(5): 964-974.
[10]	潘开华1，赵琴1，董坤1，吴康1，焦亚1，杨柱琼1，张石富1，李春花2，尹桂芳2，王艳青2，卢文洁2，王莉花2,，孙道旺2,. 魔芋新品种‘富魔1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(S2): 2779-2780.
[11]	朱晓威，崔文雪，张二金，王磊磊，余徐润，熊飞*?. ‘槟榔芋’和‘香沙芋’母芋与子芋淀粉形态和理化性质的比较[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(7): 1314-1326.
[12]	徐少卓1，赵玉文1，王义坤1，王金政2，田长平3，陈杰4，陈学森1，沈向1，尹承苗1,，毛志泉1,. 棉隆熏蒸加短期轮作葱对平邑甜茶幼苗生长及其生理的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(6): 1021-1030.
[13]	马继琼，杨奕，尹桂芳，孙道旺，许明辉，王玲. 魔芋新品种‘云魔芋迷乐2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(s2): 2703-2704.
[14]	吴学尉1，叶辉1,，刘丹丹1，吴治成2，李琳1，杨雨嫣1，王丽花3,，吴昊林2. 珠芽类魔芋新品种‘耿芋2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(s2): 2705-2706.
[15]	季延海1,3，赵孟良2，武占会1,3，梁浩1,3，刘明池1,2,*. 番茄栽培基质中菊芋发酵秸秆的适宜配比研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(8): 1599-1608.