Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 467-480.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0255
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Chaonan1, LI Lu2, GAO Danlei1, QIAO Hongyong1, YUAN Tao1,*()
Received:
2024-06-14
Revised:
2024-12-24
Online:
2025-02-25
Published:
2025-02-23
Contact:
YUAN Tao
LI Chaonan, LI Lu, GAO Danlei, QIAO Hongyong, YUAN Tao. Differences in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Community in the Roots and Rhizosphere Soil of Paeonia ludlowii Between Original Site and Introduction Site[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 467-480.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0255
试验地 Experimental field | 年均降水量/mm Annual average precipitation | 日照时长/h Sunshine duration | 年均气温/℃ Annual average temperature | 年均最低气温/℃ Annual average minimum temperature | 年均最高气温/℃ Annual average maximum temperature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
林芝Nyingchi | 702.1 | 3 019.5 | 8.7 | 3.9 | 15.6 |
栾川Luanchuan | 990.0 | 2 301.7 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 20.7 |
Table 1 Overview of the experimental field
试验地 Experimental field | 年均降水量/mm Annual average precipitation | 日照时长/h Sunshine duration | 年均气温/℃ Annual average temperature | 年均最低气温/℃ Annual average minimum temperature | 年均最高气温/℃ Annual average maximum temperature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
林芝Nyingchi | 702.1 | 3 019.5 | 8.7 | 3.9 | 15.6 |
栾川Luanchuan | 990.0 | 2 301.7 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 20.7 |
时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 叶面积/cm2 Leaf area | 株高/m Height | 冠幅/m2 Crown width | 花朵数 Number of flowers | 果实数 Number of fruits | 坐果率/% Fruit setting ratio | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花期 Flowering stage | 林芝 Nyingchi | 173.33 ± 114.42 Bc | 2.24 ± 0.25 Ab | 2.06 ± 0.33 Ac | 50.98 ± 17.62 A | / | / | |
栾川 Luanchuan | 426.55 ± 73.76 Ac | 2.31 ± 0.17 Aa | 2.14 ± 0.25 Ab | 21.99 ± 5.67 B | / | / | ||
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝 Nyingchi | 586.49 ± 84.74 Ab | 2.44 ± 0.16 Aab | 2.67 ± 0.41 Ab | / | 47.21 ± 19.14 A | 91.18 ± 6.09 A | |
栾川 Luanchuan | 737.60 ± 62.32 Aab | 2.46 ± 0.14 Aa | 2.48 ± 0.20 Ba | / | 19.40 ± 4.04 B | 89.30 ± 7.40 A | ||
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝 Nyingchi | 1 216.01 ± 324.26 Aa | 2.61 ± 0.26 Aa | 3.21 ± 0.45 Aa | / | / | / | |
栾川 Luanchuan | 835.84 ± 64.71 Ba | 2.51 ± 1.13 Aa | 2.59 ± 0.20 Ba | / | / | / |
Table 2 Growth status of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi)and introduction site(Luanchuan)
时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 叶面积/cm2 Leaf area | 株高/m Height | 冠幅/m2 Crown width | 花朵数 Number of flowers | 果实数 Number of fruits | 坐果率/% Fruit setting ratio | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花期 Flowering stage | 林芝 Nyingchi | 173.33 ± 114.42 Bc | 2.24 ± 0.25 Ab | 2.06 ± 0.33 Ac | 50.98 ± 17.62 A | / | / | |
栾川 Luanchuan | 426.55 ± 73.76 Ac | 2.31 ± 0.17 Aa | 2.14 ± 0.25 Ab | 21.99 ± 5.67 B | / | / | ||
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝 Nyingchi | 586.49 ± 84.74 Ab | 2.44 ± 0.16 Aab | 2.67 ± 0.41 Ab | / | 47.21 ± 19.14 A | 91.18 ± 6.09 A | |
栾川 Luanchuan | 737.60 ± 62.32 Aab | 2.46 ± 0.14 Aa | 2.48 ± 0.20 Ba | / | 19.40 ± 4.04 B | 89.30 ± 7.40 A | ||
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝 Nyingchi | 1 216.01 ± 324.26 Aa | 2.61 ± 0.26 Aa | 3.21 ± 0.45 Aa | / | / | / | |
栾川 Luanchuan | 835.84 ± 64.71 Ba | 2.51 ± 1.13 Aa | 2.59 ± 0.20 Ba | / | / | / |
时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 酸碱度 pH | 有机质/(g · kg-1) Organic matter | 全氮/(g · kg-1) Total N | 有效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available P | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花期 Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 5.91 ± 0.30 Ba | 18.57 ± 4.83 Ab | 1.05 ± 0.16 Aa | 1.23 ± 0.01 Ac | 27.78 ± 5.37 Ab |
栾川Luanchuan | 6.74 ± 0.41 Aa | 18.72 ± 3.28 Ab | 0.90 ± 0.21 Aa | 1.13 ± 0.05 Bb | 21.90 ± 3.46 Ab | |
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 6.15 ± 0.16 Aa | 24.24 ± 2.27 Aa | 1.16 ± 0.19 Aa | 1.86 ± 0.05 Ab | 36.24 ± 3.54 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 6.59 ± 0.50 Aa | 24.08 ± 2.51 Aa | 1.03 ± 0.13 Aa | 1.40 ± 0.08 Ba | 32.68 ± 5.37 Aa | |
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 6.19 ± 0.38 Aa | 24.81 ± 5.55 Aa | 1.13 ± 0.28 Aa | 2.02 ± 0.10 Aa | 23.74 ± 5.65 Ab |
栾川Luanchuan | 6.63 ± 0.25 Aa | 18.08 ± 4.87 Bb | 1.07 ± 0.30 Aa | 1.45 ± 0.13 Ba | 15.83 ± 2.49 Bc |
Table 3 Root-zone soil physicochemical properties of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi)and introduction site(Luanchuan)
时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 酸碱度 pH | 有机质/(g · kg-1) Organic matter | 全氮/(g · kg-1) Total N | 有效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available P | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花期 Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 5.91 ± 0.30 Ba | 18.57 ± 4.83 Ab | 1.05 ± 0.16 Aa | 1.23 ± 0.01 Ac | 27.78 ± 5.37 Ab |
栾川Luanchuan | 6.74 ± 0.41 Aa | 18.72 ± 3.28 Ab | 0.90 ± 0.21 Aa | 1.13 ± 0.05 Bb | 21.90 ± 3.46 Ab | |
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 6.15 ± 0.16 Aa | 24.24 ± 2.27 Aa | 1.16 ± 0.19 Aa | 1.86 ± 0.05 Ab | 36.24 ± 3.54 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 6.59 ± 0.50 Aa | 24.08 ± 2.51 Aa | 1.03 ± 0.13 Aa | 1.40 ± 0.08 Ba | 32.68 ± 5.37 Aa | |
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 6.19 ± 0.38 Aa | 24.81 ± 5.55 Aa | 1.13 ± 0.28 Aa | 2.02 ± 0.10 Aa | 23.74 ± 5.65 Ab |
栾川Luanchuan | 6.63 ± 0.25 Aa | 18.08 ± 4.87 Bb | 1.07 ± 0.30 Aa | 1.45 ± 0.13 Ba | 15.83 ± 2.49 Bc |
时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 孢子密度/(cfu · g-1) Spore density | 菌丝密度/(cm · g-1) Mycelial density |
---|---|---|---|
花期Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 4.54 ± 9.9 Aa | 1.87 ± 6.3 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.43 ± 5.2 Bb | 0.65 ± 2.4 Bb | |
果期Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 2.86 ± 7.7 Ab | 1.03 ± 3.4 Bb |
栾川Luanchuan | 2.22 ± 5.8 Ba | 1.55 ± 4.2 Aa | |
秋色叶期Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 2.81 ± 11.0 Ab | 1.29 ± 5.1 Bb |
栾川Luanchuan | 2.41 ± 9.5 Ba | 1.64 ± 7.6 Aa |
Table 4 Spore density and mycelial density in root-zone soil of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi)and introduction site(Luanchuan)
时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 孢子密度/(cfu · g-1) Spore density | 菌丝密度/(cm · g-1) Mycelial density |
---|---|---|---|
花期Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 4.54 ± 9.9 Aa | 1.87 ± 6.3 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.43 ± 5.2 Bb | 0.65 ± 2.4 Bb | |
果期Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 2.86 ± 7.7 Ab | 1.03 ± 3.4 Bb |
栾川Luanchuan | 2.22 ± 5.8 Ba | 1.55 ± 4.2 Aa | |
秋色叶期Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 2.81 ± 11.0 Ab | 1.29 ± 5.1 Bb |
栾川Luanchuan | 2.41 ± 9.5 Ba | 1.64 ± 7.6 Aa |
Fig. 2 Special and common AMF OTU in the root and rhizosphere soil of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi) and introduction site(Luanchuan)
部位 Compartment | 时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 香农指数 Shannon | 物种丰富度指数 Observed OTU | Pielou均匀度 Pielou evenness | Chao1指数 Chao1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系 Root | 花期 Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.34 ± 0.41 Aa | 23.00 ± 3.54 Aa | 0.42 ± 0.11 Aa | 28.48 ± 7.61 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.26 ± 0.34 Aa | 17.80 ± 8.67 Aa | 0.45 ± 0.08 Aa | 20.82 ± 6.27 Aa | ||
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.31 ± 0.73 Aa | 21.60 ± 20.40 Aa | 0.45 ± 0.20 Aa | 31.33 ± 33.74 Aa | |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.47 ± 0.57 Aa | 17.00 ± 7.04 Aa | 0.52 ± 0.15 Aa | 21.90 ± 12.31 Aa | ||
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.32 ± 0.43 Aa | 16.60 ± 8.62 Aa | 0.49 ± 0.04 Aa | 18.75 ± 9.48 Aa | |
栾川Luanchuan | 0.69 ± 0.69 Aa | 8.60 ± 7.09 Aa | 0.29 ± 0.22 Aa | 9.40 ± 7.47 Aa | ||
根际土壤 Rhizosphere soil | 花期 Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.98 ± 0.53 Aa | 39.80 ± 10.89 Aa | 0.54 ± 0.14 Aa | 53.51 ± 19.34 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.69 ± 0.40 Aa | 15.40 ± 5.86 Ba | 0.64 ± 0.07 Aa | 17.10 ± 7.06 Ba | ||
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 0.67 ± 0.53 Bb | 9.80 ± 6.26 Ab | 0.29 ± 0.25 Ba | 11.40 ± 7.70 Ab | |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.48 ± 0.42 Aa | 10.80 ± 6.10 Aa | 0.65 ± 0.12 Aa | 12.30 ± 7.22 Aa | ||
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.23 ± 1.08 Aab | 9.80 ± 3.89 Bb | 0.50 ± 0.43 Aa | 10.70 ± 3.70 Ab | |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.14 ± 0.39 Aa | 14.60 ± 2.30 Aa | 0.42 ± 0.13 Aa | 17.30 ± 5.33 Aa |
Table 5 The α diversity of AMF communities in the root and rhizosphere soil of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi)and introduction site(Luanchuan)
部位 Compartment | 时期 Stage | 试验地 Perimental field | 香农指数 Shannon | 物种丰富度指数 Observed OTU | Pielou均匀度 Pielou evenness | Chao1指数 Chao1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系 Root | 花期 Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.34 ± 0.41 Aa | 23.00 ± 3.54 Aa | 0.42 ± 0.11 Aa | 28.48 ± 7.61 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.26 ± 0.34 Aa | 17.80 ± 8.67 Aa | 0.45 ± 0.08 Aa | 20.82 ± 6.27 Aa | ||
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.31 ± 0.73 Aa | 21.60 ± 20.40 Aa | 0.45 ± 0.20 Aa | 31.33 ± 33.74 Aa | |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.47 ± 0.57 Aa | 17.00 ± 7.04 Aa | 0.52 ± 0.15 Aa | 21.90 ± 12.31 Aa | ||
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.32 ± 0.43 Aa | 16.60 ± 8.62 Aa | 0.49 ± 0.04 Aa | 18.75 ± 9.48 Aa | |
栾川Luanchuan | 0.69 ± 0.69 Aa | 8.60 ± 7.09 Aa | 0.29 ± 0.22 Aa | 9.40 ± 7.47 Aa | ||
根际土壤 Rhizosphere soil | 花期 Flowering stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.98 ± 0.53 Aa | 39.80 ± 10.89 Aa | 0.54 ± 0.14 Aa | 53.51 ± 19.34 Aa |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.69 ± 0.40 Aa | 15.40 ± 5.86 Ba | 0.64 ± 0.07 Aa | 17.10 ± 7.06 Ba | ||
果期 Fruit stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 0.67 ± 0.53 Bb | 9.80 ± 6.26 Ab | 0.29 ± 0.25 Ba | 11.40 ± 7.70 Ab | |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.48 ± 0.42 Aa | 10.80 ± 6.10 Aa | 0.65 ± 0.12 Aa | 12.30 ± 7.22 Aa | ||
秋色叶期 Autumn foliage stage | 林芝Nyingchi | 1.23 ± 1.08 Aab | 9.80 ± 3.89 Bb | 0.50 ± 0.43 Aa | 10.70 ± 3.70 Ab | |
栾川Luanchuan | 1.14 ± 0.39 Aa | 14.60 ± 2.30 Aa | 0.42 ± 0.13 Aa | 17.30 ± 5.33 Aa |
Fig. 3 Principal coordinate analysis of root and rhizosphere soil AMF communities of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi)and introduction site(Luanchuan)based on Bray Curtis distance matrix
组 Group | 根系Root | 土壤Rhizosphere soil | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | Pr(> F) | R2 | Pr(> F) | ||
栾川花期—林芝花期Luanchuan flowering stage—Nyingchi flowering stage | 0.293 | 0.011* | 0.253 | 0.02* | |
栾川果期—林芝果期Luanchuan fruit stage—Nyingchi fruit stage | 0.138 | 0.189 | 0.206 | 0.02* | |
栾川秋色叶期—林芝秋色叶期 Luanchuan autumn foliage stage—Nyingchi autumn foliage stage | 0.133 | 0.259 | 0.295 | 0.009** | |
栾川花期—栾川果期Luanchuan flowering stage—Luanchuan fruit stage | 0.133 | 0.249 | 0.124 | 0.314 | |
栾川花期—栾川秋色叶期 Luanchuan flowering stage—Luanchuan autumn foliage stage | 0.160 | 0.187 | 0.216 | 0.014* | |
栾川果期—栾川秋色叶期 Luanchuan fruit stage—Luanchuan autumn foliage stage | 0.159 | 0.189 | 0.201 | 0.026* | |
林芝花期—林芝果期Nyingchi flowering stage—Nyingchi fruit stage | 0.283 | 0.021* | 0.246 | 0.007** | |
林芝花期—林芝秋色叶期 Nyingchi flowering stage—Nyingchi autumn foliage stage | 0.234 | 0.016* | 0.303 | 0.013* | |
林芝果期—林芝秋色叶期Nyingchi fruit stage—Nyingchi autumn foliage stage | 0.145 | 0.118 | 0.175 | 0.096 |
Table 6 Adonis analysis between groups
组 Group | 根系Root | 土壤Rhizosphere soil | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | Pr(> F) | R2 | Pr(> F) | ||
栾川花期—林芝花期Luanchuan flowering stage—Nyingchi flowering stage | 0.293 | 0.011* | 0.253 | 0.02* | |
栾川果期—林芝果期Luanchuan fruit stage—Nyingchi fruit stage | 0.138 | 0.189 | 0.206 | 0.02* | |
栾川秋色叶期—林芝秋色叶期 Luanchuan autumn foliage stage—Nyingchi autumn foliage stage | 0.133 | 0.259 | 0.295 | 0.009** | |
栾川花期—栾川果期Luanchuan flowering stage—Luanchuan fruit stage | 0.133 | 0.249 | 0.124 | 0.314 | |
栾川花期—栾川秋色叶期 Luanchuan flowering stage—Luanchuan autumn foliage stage | 0.160 | 0.187 | 0.216 | 0.014* | |
栾川果期—栾川秋色叶期 Luanchuan fruit stage—Luanchuan autumn foliage stage | 0.159 | 0.189 | 0.201 | 0.026* | |
林芝花期—林芝果期Nyingchi flowering stage—Nyingchi fruit stage | 0.283 | 0.021* | 0.246 | 0.007** | |
林芝花期—林芝秋色叶期 Nyingchi flowering stage—Nyingchi autumn foliage stage | 0.234 | 0.016* | 0.303 | 0.013* | |
林芝果期—林芝秋色叶期Nyingchi fruit stage—Nyingchi autumn foliage stage | 0.145 | 0.118 | 0.175 | 0.096 |
Fig. 4 Relative abundance of root and rhizosphere soil AMF community at the genus level of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi) and introduction site(Luanchuan)
Fig. 5 LEfSe analysis of root and rhizosphere soil AMF community of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi) and introduction site(Luanchuan) Different circles in cladogram indicate different taxonomic levels,from inside to outside,phylum,class,order,family,genus and species. Each node represents a species,and the larger the node,the higher the abundance of the species,where yellow indicates that the species is not significantly different between groups,and other colors indicate that the species is significantly different. All differing species are indicated by letters,and the species specifically represented by each letter is labeled in the legend below. LDA value distribution histogram,which shows the significantly different bacteria with LDA value > 4
Fig. 6 Correlation analysis of root and rhizosphere soil AMF α diversity index, growth index and soil physicochemical properties of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi) and introduction site(Luanchuan) OM:Organic matter;TN:Total N;AP:Available P;AK:Available K;LA:Leaf area;H:Plant height;CW:Crown width
指标 Index | 栾川Luanchuan | 林芝Nyingchi | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系Root | 土壤Soil | 根系Root | 土壤Soil | |||||
r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
酸碱度pH | 0.318 | 0.008 | -0.045 | 0.649 | -0.051 | 0.638 | -0.004 | 0.4900 |
有机质/(g · kg-1) Organic matter | -0.081 | 0.699 | 0.162 | 0.078 | -0.053 | 0.627 | -0.011 | 0.5230 |
全氮/(mg · kg-1) Total N | 0.258 | 0.040* | -0.183 | 0.945 | -0.143 | 0.874 | -0.202 | 0.9920 |
有效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available P | 0.038 | 0.344 | 0.035 | 0.340 | -0.029 | 0.588 | 0.420 | 0.0004** |
速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available K | -0.085 | 0.738 | 0.304 | 0.004** | 0.198 | 0.045* | -0.035 | 0.6110 |
Table 7 Mantel analysis of root and soil AMF community structure and soil physicochemical properties of Paeonia ludlowii in the original site(Nyingchi)and introduction site(Luanchuan)
指标 Index | 栾川Luanchuan | 林芝Nyingchi | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系Root | 土壤Soil | 根系Root | 土壤Soil | |||||
r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
酸碱度pH | 0.318 | 0.008 | -0.045 | 0.649 | -0.051 | 0.638 | -0.004 | 0.4900 |
有机质/(g · kg-1) Organic matter | -0.081 | 0.699 | 0.162 | 0.078 | -0.053 | 0.627 | -0.011 | 0.5230 |
全氮/(mg · kg-1) Total N | 0.258 | 0.040* | -0.183 | 0.945 | -0.143 | 0.874 | -0.202 | 0.9920 |
有效磷/(mg · kg-1) Available P | 0.038 | 0.344 | 0.035 | 0.340 | -0.029 | 0.588 | 0.420 | 0.0004** |
速效钾/(mg · kg-1) Available K | -0.085 | 0.738 | 0.304 | 0.004** | 0.198 | 0.045* | -0.035 | 0.6110 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
陈庭巧, 袁涛, 解梦雨, 唐英, 曾秀丽. 2022. 引种栽培条件下大花黄牡丹二次枝及顶芽发育的初步研究. 北京林业大学学报, 44 (6):106-114.
|
|
[3] |
|
成仿云, 李嘉珏, 陈德忠. 1997. 中国野生牡丹自然繁殖特性研究. 园艺学报,(2):77-81.
|
|
[4] |
|
储薇, 郭信来, 张晨, 周柳婷, 吴则焰, 林文雄. 2022. 丛枝菌根真菌—植物—根际微生物互作研究进展与展望. 中国生态农业学报, 30 (11):1709-1721.
|
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
高丹蕾, 吴璐瑶, 孟凡志, 袁涛. 2022. 引种栽培条件下大花黄牡丹根际微生物多样性及群落结构. 东北农业大学学报, 53 (3):19-29.
|
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.12.5571-5575.1999 pmid: 10584019 |
[9] |
|
巩晓芳, 祝英, 彭轶楠, 王治业, 杨晖, 郭增祥, 周剑平. 2017. 当归不同生长时期根际丛枝真菌分布及土壤养分和酶活性的动态变化. 微生物学通报, 44 (11):2596-2605.
|
|
[10] |
|
郭绍霞, 张玉刚, 王莲英, 刘润近. 2010. 中国牡丹主栽培区根围土壤中的丛枝菌根真菌的分离鉴定. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 27 (2):105-109.
|
|
[11] |
|
韩如水. 2011. 西藏大花黄牡丹的现状与保护. 中南林业调查规划, 30 (3):72-73.
|
|
[12] |
doi: 10.17520/biods.2017129 |
洪德元, 周世良, 何兴金, 袁军辉, 张延龙, 成仿云, 曾秀丽, 王雁, 张秀新. 2017. 野生牡丹的生存状况和保护. 生物多样性, 25 (7):781-793.
doi: 10.17520/biods.2017129 |
|
[13] |
|
侯晖, 颜培轩, 谢沁宓, 赵宏亮, 庞丹波, 陈林, 李学斌, 胡杨, 梁咏亮, 倪细炉. 2023. 贺兰山蒙古扁桃灌丛根际土壤AM真菌群落多样性特征研究. 生态环境学报, 32 (5):857-865.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.05.004 |
|
[14] |
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.13124 |
黄宏文, 张征. 2012. 中国植物引种栽培及迁地保护的现状与展望. 生物多样性, 20 (5):559-571.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.13124 |
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00127 pmid: 26979330 |
[16] |
|
[17] |
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.06.019 |
李铭杰, 周志杰, 邢礼军, 尹鑫, 武凤霞, 刘建斌, 邹国元, 张毅功, 张淑彬. 2021. 北苍术根区土壤中AM真菌多样性及其与土壤养分相关性分析. 中国生物防治学报, 37 (6):1288-1297.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.06.019 |
|
[18] |
|
李睿, 何丽霞, 宋桂英. 2011. 野生牡丹在兰州地区的引种栽培试验. 林业实用技术,(7):55-56.
|
|
[19] |
|
刘敏, 峥嵘, 白淑兰, 王琚钢, 李龙, 段国珍. 2016. 丛枝菌根真菌物种多样性研究进展. 微生物学通报, 43 (8):1836-1843.
|
|
[20] |
|
马莉, 陈健鑫, 康定旭, 李鸿博, 刘亭, 伍建榕, 马焕成. 2023. 干热河谷木棉丛枝菌根真菌鉴定及多样性分析. 西北林学院学报, 38 (1):131-138.
|
|
[21] |
|
国家林业和草原局. 2021. 国家重点保护野生植物名录. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/3954/20210908/.
|
|
[22] |
|
倪圣武. 2009. 紫牡丹、黄牡丹、大花黄牡丹引种与迁地保护研究[硕士论文]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
|
|
[23] |
|
聂立水, 王登芝. 2019. 土壤分析. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
|
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
孙志华. 2017. 树木引种成败因素分析及对策. 现代园艺,(1):38-39.
|
|
[26] |
|
王福, 李清道, 马钧. 2013. 大花黄牡丹引种驯化成功的经验. 中国花协牡丹芍药分会. 中国洛阳国际牡丹高峰论坛论文集. 北京:中国林业出版社:122-126.
|
|
[27] |
|
汪晓红, 郭绍霞. 2018. 土壤养分含量对牡丹根区土壤中AM真菌分布的影响. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 5 (4):251-257,277.
|
|
[28] |
|
薛丽姗, 罗大庆. 2014. 大花黄牡丹物候观测及其主要气象因子关系分析. 广东农业科学, 41 (7):43-47.
|
|
[29] |
|
杨安娜, 郑艳, 曹得华, 程珵. 2009. 黄山木兰的丛枝菌根定殖状况. 生态学杂志, 28 (7):1292-1297.
|
|
[30] |
doi: 10.11669/cpj.2019.11.003 |
周丽思, 曾旭, 郭顺星. 2019. 云南白木香根内丛枝菌根真菌群落组成. 中国药学杂志, 54 (11):867-873.
doi: 10.11669/cpj.2019.11.003 |
[1] | LI Ao, ZHENG Xu, WU Chengxu, NIE Ruining, JI Xinying, TANG Jiali, ZHANG Junpei. The Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Walnut Seedlings Under Salt Stress [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(2): 423-438. |
[2] | LU Jianzeng, ZHOU Liyan, HUANG Xinyi, WU Fengzhi, GAO Danmei. Effects of Carbon Pool Strength on Plant Growth and Potassium Uptake of Tomato Intercropped with Potato-Onion [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(11): 2620-2632. |
[3] | CHEN Xin, WU Xiaolong, LIU Shengrui, HU Xianchun, LIU Chunyan. Effects of AMF on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Gene Expressions of Tea Plants Under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(10): 2358-2370. |
[4] | SONG Fang, LI Zixuan, WANG Ce, WANG Zhijing, HE Ligang, JIANG Yingchun, WU Liming, BAI Fuxi. Cloning and Function Analysis of Mycorrhizal Signaling Receptor Protein Lysin Motif Receptor-like Kinases 2 Gene(LYK2)in Citrus [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(2): 281-292. |
[5] | YUAN Tao, CHEN Tingqiao, TANG Ying. Secondary Branches Development of Paeonia ludlowii [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(1): 117-126. |
[6] | PANG Shichan1,GUO Shuang1,REN Kuiyu1,WANG Shuaishuai1,and YANG Shangdong1.2. Impact of Grafting on Soil Microbial Properties and Bacterial Community Structure in Tomato Rhizosphere [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2020, 47(2): 253-263. |
[7] | WANG Xiaobao,WANG Gongshuai,LIU Yusong,CHEN Xuesen,SHEN Xiang,YIN Chengmiao*,and MAO Zhiquan*. Correlation Analysis of Apple Replant Disease and Soil Fungal Community Structure in the Northwest Loess Plateau Area [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2018, 45(5): 855-864. |
[8] | HE Zhong-qun;HE Chao-xing;YAN Yan;ZHANG Zhi-bin;WANG Huai-song;LI Huan-xiu;and TANG Hao-ru. Regulative Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Water Absorption and Expression of Aquaporin Genes in Tomato Under Salt Stress [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2011, 38(2): 273-273–280. |
[9] | LIU Ling-zhi;Lü De-guo;QIN Si-jun;MA Huai-yu;DU Guo-dong;and LIU Guo-cheng. Carbon Catabolic Characteristics About the Soil Dominant Bacteria from ‘Hanfu’Apple Orchard with Herbage-mulching Management [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2011, 38(10): 1837-1846. |
[10] | WU Feng-zhi;BAO Jing;and LIU Shu-qin. Effects of Salt Stress on Rhizospheric Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Cucumber Yield [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2010, 37(5): 741-748. |
[11] | GUO Shao-xia;CHEN Dan-ming;and LIU Run-jin. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Peony Seedlings under Salt Stress [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2010, 37(11): 1796-1802. |
[12] | WANG Ming-yuan;XIA Ren-xue;WANG You-shan;ZHOU Kai-bing;WANG Peng;and NI Hai-zhi. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth of Poncirus trifoliate Seedlings under Iron Deficiency and Heavy Bicarbonate Stresses [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2008, 35(4): 469-474. |
[13] | HE Zhong-qun.;HE Chao-xing;ZHANG Zhi-bin;ZOU Zhi-rong;Wang Huai-song;TUNDE Takacs. Study on Osmotic Adjustment Mechanism of Toma to Salt ToleranceEnhanced by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2007, 34(1): 147-152. |
[14] | Wu Qiangsheng;;Wang Youshan;Xia Renxue. Comparision of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi for Drought Resistance of Trifoliate Orange ( Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf. ) Seedlings [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2006, 33(3): 613-616. |
[15] | Li Min;Liu Pengqi;and Liu Runjin. Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Micropagated Taro (Colocasia esculenta Schott. ) [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2002, 29(5): 451-453. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd