Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 1375-1388.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-1059
• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Shuqing1, MEN Wanjie2, TIAN Tian2, CHEN Qiuming2, YE Tingyu1, YU Hongrui1, MA Xinyan1, IQBAL Hussain1, LEI Na2,*(), YU Xiaolin1,3,*(
)
Received:
2024-12-30
Revised:
2025-03-10
Online:
2025-05-23
Published:
2025-05-21
Contact:
LEI Na, YU Xiaolin
ZHANG Shuqing, MEN Wanjie, TIAN Tian, CHEN Qiuming, YE Tingyu, YU Hongrui, MA Xinyan, IQBAL Hussain, LEI Na, YU Xiaolin. Identification of Pathotypes of Plasmodiophora brassicae and Study on Green Control in Harbin City[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(5): 1375-1388.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-1059
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | 二进制 Binary | 十进制 Decimal | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
ECD01 | 26 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 39 | 24.10 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD02 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 17.59 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD03 | 31 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 44 | 26.82 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD04 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 24 | 51 | 71.18 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD05 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 42 | 45 | 97.33 | S | 24 | 16 |
ECD06 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 35 | 32.57 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD07 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 33 | 42 | 86.43 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD08 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 41 | 84.63 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD09 | 25 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 43 | 31.86 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD10 | 37 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 45 | 11.78 | S | 24 | 16 |
ECD11 | 32 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4.74 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD12 | 30 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 43 | 9.77 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD13 | 7 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 46 | 43.70 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD14 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 38 | 81.84 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD15 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 13.71 | S | 24 | 16 |
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | 二进制 Binary | 十进制 Decimal | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
ECD01 | 26 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 39 | 24.10 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD02 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 17.59 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD03 | 31 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 44 | 26.82 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD04 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 24 | 51 | 71.18 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD05 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 42 | 45 | 97.33 | S | 24 | 16 |
ECD06 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 35 | 32.57 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD07 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 33 | 42 | 86.43 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD08 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 41 | 84.63 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD09 | 25 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 43 | 31.86 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD10 | 37 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 45 | 11.78 | S | 24 | 16 |
ECD11 | 32 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4.74 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD12 | 30 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 43 | 9.77 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD13 | 7 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 46 | 43.70 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD14 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 38 | 81.84 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD15 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 13.71 | S | 24 | 16 |
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定 Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
‘Jersey Queen’ | 7 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 46 | 43.70 | S |
‘Badger Shipper’ | 32 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4.74 | R |
‘Laurentian’ | 15 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 43 | 33.02 | S |
‘Wilhelmsburger’ | 37 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 45 | 11.78 | S |
Table 2 Physiological race identification of P. brassicae from Acheng District using Williams set
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定 Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
‘Jersey Queen’ | 7 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 46 | 43.70 | S |
‘Badger Shipper’ | 32 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4.74 | R |
‘Laurentian’ | 15 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 43 | 33.02 | S |
‘Wilhelmsburger’ | 37 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 45 | 11.78 | S |
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | 二进制 Binary | 十进制 Decimal | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
ECD01 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 36 | 20.00 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD02 | 12 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 36 | 21.67 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD03 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 22 | 36 | 81.94 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD04 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 36 | 64.44 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD05 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 8 | 36 | 67.22 | S | 24 | 16 |
ECD06 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 2.50 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD07 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 38 | 96.84 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD08 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 27 | 36 | 90.00 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD09 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 14 | 34 | 61.47 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD10 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 38 | 7.89 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD11 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 36 | 53.33 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD12 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 36 | 27.22 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 100.00 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD14 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 27 | 36 | 90.00 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD15 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 34 | 32.65 | S | 24 | 16 |
Table 3 Physiological race identification of P. brassicae from Wuchang City using ECD set
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | 二进制 Binary | 十进制 Decimal | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
ECD01 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 36 | 20.00 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD02 | 12 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 36 | 21.67 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD03 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 22 | 36 | 81.94 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD04 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 36 | 64.44 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD05 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 8 | 36 | 67.22 | S | 24 | 16 |
ECD06 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 2.50 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD07 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 38 | 96.84 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD08 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 27 | 36 | 90.00 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD09 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 14 | 34 | 61.47 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD10 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 38 | 7.89 | R | 0 | 0 |
ECD11 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 36 | 53.33 | S | 20 | 1 |
ECD12 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 36 | 27.22 | S | 21 | 2 |
ECD13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 100.00 | S | 22 | 4 |
ECD14 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 27 | 36 | 90.00 | S | 23 | 8 |
ECD15 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 34 | 32.65 | S | 24 | 16 |
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定 Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
‘Jersey Queen’ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 100.00 | S |
‘Badger Shipper’ | 3 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 36 | 53.33 | S |
‘Laurentian’ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 100.00 | S |
‘Wilhelmsburger’ | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 38 | 7.89 | R |
Table 4 Pathotype identification of P. brassicae from Wuchang City using Williams set
鉴别寄主 Differential host | 各病级株数Number of plants at different level | 总数 Total | 病情指数 Disease index | 抗(R)/感(S)鉴定 Resistance(R)/susceptibility(S)identification | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
‘Jersey Queen’ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 100.00 | S |
‘Badger Shipper’ | 3 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 36 | 53.33 | S |
‘Laurentian’ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 100.00 | S |
‘Wilhelmsburger’ | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 38 | 7.89 | R |
前茬作物 Preceding crop | 阿城区Acheng District | 五常市Wuchang City | 松北区Songbei District | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果/% Control efficacy | 病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果/% Control efficacy | 病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果/% Control efficacy | |
对照Control | 61.49 ± 3.44 a | / | 52.06 ± 10.37 b | / | 12.95 ± 1.36 b | / |
黄豆Soybean | 57.10 ± 0.59 ab | 7.15 | 85.62 ± 7.44 a | -64.47 | 19.01 ± 4.09 a | -46.73 |
豌豆Pea | 43.46 ± 1.01 de | 29.33 | 50.43 ± 8.92 b | 3.13 | 5.62 ± 1.41 d | 56.64 |
分蘖洋葱Potato-onion | 39.61 ± 2.40 e | 35.58 | 82.53 ± 0.76 a | -58.55 | 8.31 ± 0.85 cd | 35.82 |
大蒜Garlic | 52.54 ± 1.63 bc | 14.57 | 71.64 ± 12.57 a | -37.63 | 11.61 ± 1.54 bc | 10.40 |
马铃薯Potato | 48.01 ± 4.50 cd | 21.93 | 71.86 ± 7.64 a | -38.04 | 14.60 ± 1.12 b | -12.69 |
Table 5 The effect of crop rotation on the incidence of clubroot of Chinese cabbage after crop rotation
前茬作物 Preceding crop | 阿城区Acheng District | 五常市Wuchang City | 松北区Songbei District | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果/% Control efficacy | 病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果/% Control efficacy | 病情指数 Disease index | 防治效果/% Control efficacy | |
对照Control | 61.49 ± 3.44 a | / | 52.06 ± 10.37 b | / | 12.95 ± 1.36 b | / |
黄豆Soybean | 57.10 ± 0.59 ab | 7.15 | 85.62 ± 7.44 a | -64.47 | 19.01 ± 4.09 a | -46.73 |
豌豆Pea | 43.46 ± 1.01 de | 29.33 | 50.43 ± 8.92 b | 3.13 | 5.62 ± 1.41 d | 56.64 |
分蘖洋葱Potato-onion | 39.61 ± 2.40 e | 35.58 | 82.53 ± 0.76 a | -58.55 | 8.31 ± 0.85 cd | 35.82 |
大蒜Garlic | 52.54 ± 1.63 bc | 14.57 | 71.64 ± 12.57 a | -37.63 | 11.61 ± 1.54 bc | 10.40 |
马铃薯Potato | 48.01 ± 4.50 cd | 21.93 | 71.86 ± 7.64 a | -38.04 | 14.60 ± 1.12 b | -12.69 |
前茬作物 Preceding crop | 阿城区Acheng District | 五常市Wuchang City | 松北区Songbei District | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前茬作物 Preceding crop | 后茬作物 Succeeding crop | 前茬作物 Preceding crop | 后茬作物 Succeeding crop | 前茬作物 Preceding crop | 后茬作物 Succeeding crop | |
对照Control | 46.13 ± 2.91 a | 76.33 ± 5.63 a | 19.10 ± 1.57 a | 215.11 ± 32.60 a | 23.98 ± 4.46 a | 75.70 ± 7.01 a |
黄豆Soybean | 15.64 ± 3.47 c | 24.60 ± 6.26 c | 8.34 ± 4.31 cd | 140.00 ± 31.24 b | 5.60 ± 1.80 b | 15.80 ± 8.79 bcd |
豌豆Pea | 2.55 ± 1.13 d | 37.97 ± 15.80 bc | 16.50 ± 1.81 ab | 113.00 ± 42.57 b | 8.01 ± 2.86 b | 27.70 ± 11.00 b |
分蘖洋葱Potato-onion | 1.12 ± 0.28 d | 3.97 ± 0.95 d | 5.06 ± 0.65 d | 43.60 ± 2.25 c | 5.83 ± 1.64 b | 7.86 ± 2.90 d |
大蒜Garlic | 3.34 ± 1.47 d | 6.12 ± 1.02 d | 12.30 ± 2.36 bc | 29.10 ± 12.92 c | 6.13 ± 1.88 b | 10.50 ± 1.10 cd |
马铃薯Potato | 27.78 ± 11.63 b | 54.03 ± 11.32 b | 7.87 ± 3.07 cd | 56.70 ± 11.75 c | 8.98 ± 3.23 b | 24.30 ± 8.07 bc |
Table 6 The effect of crop rotation on the copies of dormant spores in soil × 103 copies · g-1
前茬作物 Preceding crop | 阿城区Acheng District | 五常市Wuchang City | 松北区Songbei District | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前茬作物 Preceding crop | 后茬作物 Succeeding crop | 前茬作物 Preceding crop | 后茬作物 Succeeding crop | 前茬作物 Preceding crop | 后茬作物 Succeeding crop | |
对照Control | 46.13 ± 2.91 a | 76.33 ± 5.63 a | 19.10 ± 1.57 a | 215.11 ± 32.60 a | 23.98 ± 4.46 a | 75.70 ± 7.01 a |
黄豆Soybean | 15.64 ± 3.47 c | 24.60 ± 6.26 c | 8.34 ± 4.31 cd | 140.00 ± 31.24 b | 5.60 ± 1.80 b | 15.80 ± 8.79 bcd |
豌豆Pea | 2.55 ± 1.13 d | 37.97 ± 15.80 bc | 16.50 ± 1.81 ab | 113.00 ± 42.57 b | 8.01 ± 2.86 b | 27.70 ± 11.00 b |
分蘖洋葱Potato-onion | 1.12 ± 0.28 d | 3.97 ± 0.95 d | 5.06 ± 0.65 d | 43.60 ± 2.25 c | 5.83 ± 1.64 b | 7.86 ± 2.90 d |
大蒜Garlic | 3.34 ± 1.47 d | 6.12 ± 1.02 d | 12.30 ± 2.36 bc | 29.10 ± 12.92 c | 6.13 ± 1.88 b | 10.50 ± 1.10 cd |
马铃薯Potato | 27.78 ± 11.63 b | 54.03 ± 11.32 b | 7.87 ± 3.07 cd | 56.70 ± 11.75 c | 8.98 ± 3.23 b | 24.30 ± 8.07 bc |
Fig. 3 The effect of chemical treatments on the incidence of clubroot disease and the growth of Chinese cabbage Duncan’s multiple comparisons,different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments. P < 0.05
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
高莹莹. 2020. 芸薹根肿菌单孢分离及根肿病感病基因的功能分析[硕士论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学.
|
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
韩之琪, 谢学文, 晋知文, 宋加伟, 柴阿丽, 石延霞, 李宝聚. 2015. 氟唑活化酯诱导大白菜抗根肿病效果与机理初步研究. 园艺学报, 42 (4):697-705.
|
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0421 |
芮婷婷, 高青云, 李晓菁, 石延霞, 谢学文, 李磊, 张红杰, 徐文娟, 柴阿丽, 李宝聚. 2022. 芸薹根肿菌单孢亚甲基蓝琼脂糖分离法及其对生理小种的鉴定. 园艺学报, 49 (6):1290-1300.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0421 |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
王青, 胡燕, 陈姗, 陆景伟, 郑阳, 陶伟林, 孙现超, 周娜, 陈国康. 2024. 绛红褐链霉菌CC2-6抑制大白菜根肿病的效果及机制分析. 园艺学报, 51 (5):1137-1150.
|
|
[33] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0591 |
王钰, 张雪, 张学颖, 张思雨, 闻婷婷, 王迎君, 甘彩霞, 庞文星. 2022. 抗毒素Camalexin对大白菜抗根肿病的作用研究. 园艺学报, 49 (8):1689-1698.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0591 |
|
[34] |
|
吴畅, 史亚茹, 周元委, 熊秋芳, 张椿雨, 陈鹏, 栗茂腾. 2024. 我国甘蓝型油菜抗根肿病品种培育现状、主要问题和对策. 中国油料作物学报,https://doi.org/10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2024078.
|
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
原玉香, 赵艳艳, 魏小春, 姚秋菊, 蒋武生, 王志勇, 李扬, 许茜, 杨双娟, 张晓伟. 2017. 河南省大白菜根肿病菌生理小种鉴定. 河南农业科学, 46 (7):71-76.
|
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
张慧, 张淑江, 李菲, 章时蕃, 李国亮, 马小超, 刘希童, 孙日飞. 2020. 大白菜抗根肿病育种研究进展. 园艺学报, 47 (9):1648-1662.
|
|
[42] |
|
张晶, 武月, 冯辉, 葛文杰, 刘旭垚, 吕明灿, 王艺琏, 冀瑞琴. 2019. 根肿菌Williams系统中各单孢生理小种的获得与鉴定. 园艺学报, 46 (12):2415-2422.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x. 2019-0182 |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[1] | HU Yun, WEN Chunhuai, XIONG Xingcheng, YU Benyu, HE Shenghua. A New Cultivar of Low-Temperature Resistant Chinese Cabbage‘Zhuochunbai 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 81-82. |
[2] | PANG Wenxing, YE Taining, JIANG Jing, LIANG Yue, WANG Xin, LIU Xin. A New Cultivar of Clubroot-Resistant Chinese Cabbage‘Yuxing 9’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 83-84. |
[3] | MEN Xuejie, ZHOU Jin, WU Yanghuan, CHEN Fang, YANG Qihang, PARUKE • Aniwaer. A New Seedling-Edible Chinese Cabbage Cultivar‘Zaokuai 25’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 85-86. |
[4] | LIU Chong, YI Dandan, ZOU Danrong, ZHOU Lixue, WANG Hui, SHENG Lili, CHEN Xiaofeng, ZHANG Yaming, GUI Hang. A New Non-Heading Chinese Cabbage Cultivar‘Qingmei 1’of High-Yield and High-Quality [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 87-88. |
[5] | ZHANG Lei, WANG Qingming, ZHOU Jie, WANG Yue’e, CAI Huaqing, WEI Lijun, LIU Daomin. A New Non-Heading Chinese Cabbage Cultivar‘Wancuibai’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 89-90. |
[6] | YU Xiaolin, PING Fan, HUANG Li, CAO Jiashu, SONG Jianwei, LU Gang. A New Early-Mid Maturing Non-Heading Chinese Cabbage Cultivar‘Qiantangqing’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(S1): 91-92. |
[7] | ZHANG Fenglan, SU Tongbing, ZHANG Bin, YU Shuancang, YU Yangjun, ZHANG Deshuang, ZHAO Xiuyun, WANG Weihong, LI Peirong, XIN Xiaoyun. Review and Prospects of Chinese Cabbage Breeding for the Past 70 Years in China [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(5): 1111-1135. |
[8] | ZHANG Meidi, MA Ming, LI Xiaonan, JIANG Mingliang. Research Progress on Bolting Resistance Traits in Chinese Cabbage [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(5): 1136-1158. |
[9] | ZHENG Jingyi, LI Xiaonan, PIAO Zhongyun. Multi-omics Approaches to Improve the Studies on the Mechanisms of Clubroot Resistance in Brassica Hosts [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(5): 1213-1232. |
[10] | WANG Wenlong, LIU Zhaokun, LU Wenjun, WANG Yaolong, LI Xiaofeng, ZHU Hongfang, LIU Tongkun, LI Ying, HOU Xilin, ZHANG Changwei. Enhancing Ascorbic Acid Content in Non-heading Chinese Cabbage Using Gene Editing Technology [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(5): 1317-1325. |
[11] | XU Xiuxiu, YE Xinyu, SHI Bo, ZHANG Shujiang, ZHANG Shifan, LI Fei, LI Guoliang, SUN Rifei, WANG Shunli, SUN Huagang, ZHANG Hui. Analysis of Flavor Quality of Chinese Cabbage Yutian Baojian [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(5): 1364-1374. |
[12] | WANG Qing, HU Yan, CHEN Shan, LU Jingwei, ZHENG Yang, TAO Weilin, SUN Xianchao, ZHOU Na, CHEN Guokang. Biocontrol Efficacy and Mechanisms of Streptomyces purpeofuscus CC2-6 Against Chinese Cabbage Clubroot Caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(5): 1137-1150. |
[13] | GUO Juxian, FU Mei, LUO Wenlong, LUO Shanwei, LI Guihua. A New Flowering Chinese Cabbage Cultivar‘Yuetai 2’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(4): 915-916. |
[14] | ZHANG Hong, WANG Chaonan, FAN Weiqiang, HUANG Zhiyin, LIU Xiaohui, LI Mei, ZHANG Bin. A New Cultivar of Early Mature Miniature Headed Chinese Cabbage‘Jinwawa 560’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(12): 2989-2990. |
[15] | LI Renjie , YUAN Lingyun , CHEN Guohu , HOU Jinfeng , HUANG Xingxue , and WANG Chenggang, . [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(S1): 41-42. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd