Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 3090-3102.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0950
• New Technology and New Method • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Ziwei1, ZHANG Hua1, QIU Shuai2, TANG Yuchao1, FU Xuehao1, ZHANG Gachen1, SUN Ming1,*(
), and LIU Xiuli1,*(
)
Received:2025-01-08
Revised:2025-08-06
Online:2025-11-26
Published:2025-11-26
Contact:
SUN Ming, and LIU Xiuli
YANG Ziwei, ZHANG Hua, QIU Shuai, TANG Yuchao, FU Xuehao, ZHANG Gachen, SUN Ming, and LIU Xiuli. High Temperature and Trifluralin Induce 2n Pollen in Hydrangea macrophylla[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(11): 3090-3102.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2024-0950
Fig. 2 Meiosis process in Hydrangea macrophylla A:Pollen mother cell;B:Prophase Ⅰ-leptotene;C:Diakinesis;D:Metaphase Ⅰ;E:Anaphase Ⅰ;F:Telophase Ⅰ; G:Prophase Ⅱ;H:Metaphase Ⅱ;I:AnaphaseⅡ;J:Telophase Ⅱ;K:Tetrad;L:Mature pollen
| 花蕾直径/mm Flower bud diameter | 花药宽/mm Anther width | 花药长/mm Anther length | 花序状态 Morphology of inflorescence | 减数分裂进程 Meiosis stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.30 ~ 1.70 | 0.30 ~ 0.60 | 0.50 ~ 0.60 | 不育花未张开、花梗伸长、小叶与花序有一定夹角 Decorative florets closed,pedicel elongating,bracts angled | 小孢子母细胞 Pollen mother cell |
| 1.70 ~ 1.90 | 0.50 ~ 0.70 | 0.60 ~ 0.70 | 不育花未张开、花梗伸长并张开、小叶基本打开 Decorative florets closed,pedicel spreading,bracts open | 细线期—粗线期 Leptotene-pachytene |
| 1.90 ~ 2.00 | 0.60 ~ 0.08 | 0.65 ~ 0.80 | 不育花膨大、花梗伸长、花蕾分散、小叶完全打开 Decorative florets swollen,pedicel elongate,buds loose,bracts fully open | 终变期 Diakinesis |
| 2.00 ~ 2.10 | 0.60 ~ 0.85 | 0.80 ~ 0.85 | 不育花开时打开、花梗进一步伸长、花蕾进一步分散Decorative florets opening,pedicel further elongate,buds more dispersed | 中期Ⅰ—前Ⅱ Metaphase I-ProphaseⅡ |
| 2.20 ~ 2.30 | 0.70 ~ 0.85 | 0.85 ~ 0.95 | 不育花进一步打开、花梗和花蕾进一步分散 Decorative florets fully open,pedicel and buds widely spaced | 前Ⅱ—四分体时期 Prophase Ⅱ-Tetrad |
| > 2.30 | 0.85 ~ 0.90 | 0.95 ~ 1.00 | 不育花张开、小叶成长为正常叶片大小 Decorative florets open,bracts reach mature leaf size | 成熟配子 Mature gametophyte |
Table 1 Correlation between microspore meiosis stages and flower bud morphology in Hydrangea macrophylla
| 花蕾直径/mm Flower bud diameter | 花药宽/mm Anther width | 花药长/mm Anther length | 花序状态 Morphology of inflorescence | 减数分裂进程 Meiosis stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.30 ~ 1.70 | 0.30 ~ 0.60 | 0.50 ~ 0.60 | 不育花未张开、花梗伸长、小叶与花序有一定夹角 Decorative florets closed,pedicel elongating,bracts angled | 小孢子母细胞 Pollen mother cell |
| 1.70 ~ 1.90 | 0.50 ~ 0.70 | 0.60 ~ 0.70 | 不育花未张开、花梗伸长并张开、小叶基本打开 Decorative florets closed,pedicel spreading,bracts open | 细线期—粗线期 Leptotene-pachytene |
| 1.90 ~ 2.00 | 0.60 ~ 0.08 | 0.65 ~ 0.80 | 不育花膨大、花梗伸长、花蕾分散、小叶完全打开 Decorative florets swollen,pedicel elongate,buds loose,bracts fully open | 终变期 Diakinesis |
| 2.00 ~ 2.10 | 0.60 ~ 0.85 | 0.80 ~ 0.85 | 不育花开时打开、花梗进一步伸长、花蕾进一步分散Decorative florets opening,pedicel further elongate,buds more dispersed | 中期Ⅰ—前Ⅱ Metaphase I-ProphaseⅡ |
| 2.20 ~ 2.30 | 0.70 ~ 0.85 | 0.85 ~ 0.95 | 不育花进一步打开、花梗和花蕾进一步分散 Decorative florets fully open,pedicel and buds widely spaced | 前Ⅱ—四分体时期 Prophase Ⅱ-Tetrad |
| > 2.30 | 0.85 ~ 0.90 | 0.95 ~ 1.00 | 不育花张开、小叶成长为正常叶片大小 Decorative florets open,bracts reach mature leaf size | 成熟配子 Mature gametophyte |
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 处理浓度(+ 2% DMSO)/% Treatment concentration | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 2n花粉诱导率/% Induction rate of 2n pollen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 小孢子母细胞 Pollen mother cell | 0.05 | 24 | 27.34 ± 1.66 |
| 48 | 47.31 ± 7.11 | ||
| 72 | 40.94 ± 1.65 | ||
| 0.10 | 24 | 42.06 ± 1.93 | |
| 48 | 65.55 ± 6.40 | ||
| 72 | 40.33 ± 7.42 | ||
| 0.15 | 24 | 33.26 ± 9.05 | |
| 48 | 36.46 ± 2.45 | ||
| 72 | - | ||
| 终变期—中期Ⅰ Diakinesis-metaphase Ⅰ | 0.05 | 24 | 34.29 ± 7.50 |
| 48 | 31.66 ± 5.44 | ||
| 72 | 45.23 ± 11.81 | ||
| 0.10 | 24 | 40.73 ± 3.05 | |
| 48 | 39.12 ± 5.42 | ||
| 72 | 31.18 ± 9.27 | ||
| 0.15 | 24 | 35.19 ± 5.76 | |
| 48 | 29.84 ± 10.60 | ||
| 72 | - |
Table 2 The induction effects of 2n pollen by different combinations of trifluralin treatments.
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 处理浓度(+ 2% DMSO)/% Treatment concentration | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 2n花粉诱导率/% Induction rate of 2n pollen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 小孢子母细胞 Pollen mother cell | 0.05 | 24 | 27.34 ± 1.66 |
| 48 | 47.31 ± 7.11 | ||
| 72 | 40.94 ± 1.65 | ||
| 0.10 | 24 | 42.06 ± 1.93 | |
| 48 | 65.55 ± 6.40 | ||
| 72 | 40.33 ± 7.42 | ||
| 0.15 | 24 | 33.26 ± 9.05 | |
| 48 | 36.46 ± 2.45 | ||
| 72 | - | ||
| 终变期—中期Ⅰ Diakinesis-metaphase Ⅰ | 0.05 | 24 | 34.29 ± 7.50 |
| 48 | 31.66 ± 5.44 | ||
| 72 | 45.23 ± 11.81 | ||
| 0.10 | 24 | 40.73 ± 3.05 | |
| 48 | 39.12 ± 5.42 | ||
| 72 | 31.18 ± 9.27 | ||
| 0.15 | 24 | 35.19 ± 5.76 | |
| 48 | 29.84 ± 10.60 | ||
| 72 | - |
| 变异来源 Source of variation | df | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 1 | 8.61* | 0.006 |
| 处理浓度Treatment concentration | 2 | 50.60** | < 0.001 |
| 处理时间Treatment time | 2 | 26.24** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理浓度Meiotic stage × treatment concentration | 2 | 4.25* | 0.022 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment time | 2 | 10.63** | < 0.001 |
| 处理浓度 × 处理时间Treatment concentration × treatment time | 4 | 22.63** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂 × 处理浓度 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment concentration × treatment time | 4 | 0.85 | 0.503 |
Table 3 Variance analysis on induction rates of 2n pollen by trifluralin induction in Hydrangea macrophylla under different treatment combination
| 变异来源 Source of variation | df | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 1 | 8.61* | 0.006 |
| 处理浓度Treatment concentration | 2 | 50.60** | < 0.001 |
| 处理时间Treatment time | 2 | 26.24** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理浓度Meiotic stage × treatment concentration | 2 | 4.25* | 0.022 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment time | 2 | 10.63** | < 0.001 |
| 处理浓度 × 处理时间Treatment concentration × treatment time | 4 | 22.63** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂 × 处理浓度 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment concentration × treatment time | 4 | 0.85 | 0.503 |
| 不同浓度下氟乐灵处理 Treated with different concentrations of trifluralin treatment | 不同时间下氟乐灵处理 Treated with different times of trifluralin treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 处理浓度/% Treatment concentration | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen |
| 0.05 | 37.80 ± 9.42 b | 24 | 35.48 ± 6.87 b |
| 0.10 | 43.16 ± 12.07 a | 48 | 41.65 ± 13.64 a |
| 0.15 | 22.45 ± 17.28 c | 72 | 26.28 ± 20.43 c |
Table 4 Multiple comparison of the induction rate of 2n pollen in Hydrangea macrophylla treated with different concentrations and different times of trifluralin treatment
| 不同浓度下氟乐灵处理 Treated with different concentrations of trifluralin treatment | 不同时间下氟乐灵处理 Treated with different times of trifluralin treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 处理浓度/% Treatment concentration | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen |
| 0.05 | 37.80 ± 9.42 b | 24 | 35.48 ± 6.87 b |
| 0.10 | 43.16 ± 12.07 a | 48 | 41.65 ± 13.64 a |
| 0.15 | 22.45 ± 17.28 c | 72 | 26.28 ± 20.43 c |
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 处理温度/℃ Treatment temperature | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 2n花粉诱导率/% Induction rates of 2n pollen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 细线期—粗线期 Leptotene-pachytene | 38 | 2 | 3.07 ± 0.93 |
| 4 | 4.83 ± 2.49 | ||
| 6 | 5.12 ± 0.75 | ||
| 40 | 2 | 5.19 ± 0.62 | |
| 4 | 5.75 ± 1.29 | ||
| 6 | 7.76 ± 1.12 | ||
| 42 | 2 | 5.20 ± 0.25 | |
| 4 | 1.14 ± 0.91 | ||
| 6 | - | ||
| 终变期—中期Ⅰ Diakinesis-metaphase Ⅰ | 38 | 2 | 5.46 ± 1.47 |
| 4 | 13.96 ± 1.91 | ||
| 6 | 17.06 ± 3.53 | ||
| 40 | 2 | 12.12 ± 1.47 | |
| 4 | 14.44 ± 3.92 | ||
| 6 | 21.41 ± 2.83 | ||
| 42 | 2 | 8.13 ± 1.43 | |
| 4 | 10.04 ± 0.71 | ||
| 6 | - |
Table 5 The induction effects of 2n pollen by different combinations of high temperature treatments
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 处理温度/℃ Treatment temperature | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 2n花粉诱导率/% Induction rates of 2n pollen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 细线期—粗线期 Leptotene-pachytene | 38 | 2 | 3.07 ± 0.93 |
| 4 | 4.83 ± 2.49 | ||
| 6 | 5.12 ± 0.75 | ||
| 40 | 2 | 5.19 ± 0.62 | |
| 4 | 5.75 ± 1.29 | ||
| 6 | 7.76 ± 1.12 | ||
| 42 | 2 | 5.20 ± 0.25 | |
| 4 | 1.14 ± 0.91 | ||
| 6 | - | ||
| 终变期—中期Ⅰ Diakinesis-metaphase Ⅰ | 38 | 2 | 5.46 ± 1.47 |
| 4 | 13.96 ± 1.91 | ||
| 6 | 17.06 ± 3.53 | ||
| 40 | 2 | 12.12 ± 1.47 | |
| 4 | 14.44 ± 3.92 | ||
| 6 | 21.41 ± 2.83 | ||
| 42 | 2 | 8.13 ± 1.43 | |
| 4 | 10.04 ± 0.71 | ||
| 6 | - |
| 变异来源 Source of variation | df | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 1 | 205.70** | < 0.001 |
| 处理温度Treatment temperature | 2 | 64.97** | < 0.001 |
| 处理时间Treatment time | 2 | 7.91** | 0.001 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理温度Meiotic stage × treatment temperature | 2 | 14.13** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment time | 2 | 9.25** | < 0.001 |
| 处理温度 × 处理时间Treatment temperature × treatment time | 4 | 26.11** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂 × 处理温度 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment temperature × treatment time | 4 | 9.78** | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Variance analysis on induction rates of 2n pollen by high temperature induction in Hydrangea macrophylla under different treatment combination
| 变异来源 Source of variation | df | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 减数分裂时期 Meiotic stage | 1 | 205.70** | < 0.001 |
| 处理温度Treatment temperature | 2 | 64.97** | < 0.001 |
| 处理时间Treatment time | 2 | 7.91** | 0.001 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理温度Meiotic stage × treatment temperature | 2 | 14.13** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂时期 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment time | 2 | 9.25** | < 0.001 |
| 处理温度 × 处理时间Treatment temperature × treatment time | 4 | 26.11** | < 0.001 |
| 减数分裂 × 处理温度 × 处理时间Meiotic stage × treatment temperature × treatment time | 4 | 9.78** | < 0.001 |
| 不同温度下高温处理 Treated with different temperature of high temperature treatment | 不同时间下高温处理 Treated with different times of high temperature treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 处理温度/℃ Treatment temperature | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen |
| 38 | 8.25 ± 5.69 b | 2 | 6.52 ± 3.13 b |
| 40 | 11.11 ± 6.12 a | 4 | 8.36 ± 5.33 a |
| 42 | 4.29 ± 3.95 c | 6 | 7.88 ± 5.94 a |
Table 7 Multiple comparison of the induction rate of 2n pollen in Hydrangea macrophylla treated with different temperatures and different times of high temperature treatment
| 不同温度下高温处理 Treated with different temperature of high temperature treatment | 不同时间下高温处理 Treated with different times of high temperature treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 处理温度/℃ Treatment temperature | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen | 处理时间/h Treatment time | 平均2n花粉诱导率/% Average induction rate of 2n pollen |
| 38 | 8.25 ± 5.69 b | 2 | 6.52 ± 3.13 b |
| 40 | 11.11 ± 6.12 a | 4 | 8.36 ± 5.33 a |
| 42 | 4.29 ± 3.95 c | 6 | 7.88 ± 5.94 a |
Fig. 5 2n pollen tube elongation of Hydrangea macrophylla and abnormalities in pollen A:n pollen tube of Hydrangea macrophylla;B:2n pollen tube of Hydrangea macrophylla;C:2n pollen not germinating;D:2n pollen tube bending;E:Difficulty in elongation of 2n pollen tube;F:Irregularity in 2n pollen
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
|
程世平, 姚鹏强, 耿喜宁, 刘春洋, 谢丽华. 2022. 高温诱导牡丹产生未减数花粉. 园艺学报, 49 (3):581-589.
|
|
| [6] |
|
|
储丽红, 彭佳佳, 王钊, 赵凯, 袁素霞, 明军, 刘春. 2014. 氨磺灵、氟乐灵和秋水仙素诱导安祖花多倍体的研究. 园艺学报, 41 (11):2275-2280.
|
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
|
高鹏, 林威, 康向阳. 2004. 秋水仙碱诱导杜仲花粉染色体加倍的研究. 北京林业大学学报,(4):39-42.
|
|
| [34] |
|
|
王爱华, 吴青青, 杨澜, 陈之林. 2017. 铁皮石斛2n花粉诱导及其形成的细胞机制研究. 西北植物学报, 37 (2):273-277.
|
|
| [35] |
|
|
王煜琳, 黄焜, 周祎晴, 苏雪, 李斌. 2024. 自然降温过程中北京地区3种绣球的耐寒性研究. 安徽农业科学, 52 (17):42-45.
|
|
| [36] |
|
|
王子玥, 刘光欣, 邱帅, 高凯, 魏建芬, 甄艳, 席梦利. 2023. 绣球小孢子母细胞减数分裂染色体行为及花粉特征. 林业科学, 59 (7):89-95.
|
|
| [37] |
|
|
卫兆芬. 1994. 中国绣球属植物的修订. 广西植物,(2):101-121.
|
|
| [38] |
|
|
吴可鹏, 徐炜杰, 谢丽丽, 潘崇仁. 2020. 绣球属植物引种及适应性试验. 浙江农业科学, 61 (3):549-551.
|
|
| [39] |
|
|
辛昊阳, 王帅, 刘光欣, 甄艳, 施季森, 匡华琳, 席梦利. 2016. 美洲黑杨小孢子母细胞减数分裂进程与花芽及花药外观形态相关性研究. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 40 (2):48-52.
|
|
| [40] |
|
|
张海立, 宋杰, 李叶芳, 孟静, 关文灵. 2024. 三角梅‘安格斯’花部特征及花粉母细胞减数分裂进程研究. 分子植物育种,1-19.
|
|
| [41] |
|
|
张平冬. 2023. 植物2n配子发生机理研究进展. 北京林业大学学报, 45 (7):1-8.
|
|
| [42] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
|
焦隽, 梁丽君, 马辉, 李风童, 陈秀兰, 何榕. 2016. 绣球种质资源引进与栽培技术. 现代农业科技,11:203-204.
|
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
|
康向阳. 2010. 关于杨树多倍体育种的几点认识. 北京林业大学学报, 32 (5):149-153.
|
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [42] |
赵晨光, 李燕杰, 张平冬, 康向阳. 2015. 胡杨未减数2n花粉形成的细胞学机制. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 39 (6):40-44.
|
| [43] |
|
|
赵一帆, 孔博, 程雪桐, 李亮, 凌傲宇, 李智群, 康向阳, 张平冬. 2023. 赤霉素喷洒处理诱导新疆杨2n花粉产生及其对微管骨架的影响. 北京林业大学学报, 45 (1):40-50.
|
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
|
周晴, 吴剑, 桑亚茹, 赵征洋, 刘美芹, 张平冬. 2020. 秋水仙碱处理诱导银灰杨2n花粉与杂种三倍体创制. 北京林业大学学报, 42 (3):119-126.
|
|
| [46] |
|
| [19] |
李悦, 康向阳, 杨伟光, 郭长花. 2008. 高温诱导诸葛菜花粉染色体加倍研究. 西北植物学报,(6):1128-1133.
|
| [20] |
|
|
廖晓珊, 吴青青, 张朝君, 周俊, 郑思乡, 王淋玉. 2016. 东方百合2n花粉诱导及鉴定研究. 北方园艺,(8):56-60.
|
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
|
刘国宇, 王庆, 张文波, 刘安成, 赵雪艳, 李艳. 2024. 4种绣球花粉离体萌发研究. 西北农业学报, 33 (9):1681-1689.
|
|
| [23] |
|
|
买旖旎, 李树战, 索玉静, 孙鹏, 韩卫娟, 刁松锋, 王丽媛, 李华威, 傅建敏. 2019. 柿不同种质中的天然2n花粉得率的评价及诱导时期的判定. 中国农业大学学报, 24 (12):44-52.
|
|
| [24] |
|
|
毛彦科, 张平冬, 石乐, 董春波, 索玉静, 康向阳. 2013. 高温诱导杜仲2n花粉最佳处理条件研究. 北京林业大学学报, 35 (1):53-58.
|
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
|
孙榕泽, 朱绍才, 崔雅琦, 赵家庚, 王宇暄, 于晓南. 2024. 芍药雌配子发育和2n雌配子诱导. 东北林业大学学报, 52 (5):49-55.
|
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [1] | ZHANG Yu, GENG Xining, PENG Chaofeng, LI Meiyu, QI Shuaizheng, YANG Yingjun, CHENG Shiping. Pollen Chromosome Doubling of Ehretia macrophylla Induced by High Temperature [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2025, 52(10): 2666-2676. |
| [2] | YANG Jun, KONG Yu, LIU Qunlu, YE Kang, QIN Jun. Effects of Shading on the Variation of Sepal Color and Pigment Composition in Hydrangea macrophylla‘Hanatemari’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1467-1481. |
| [3] | CHU Li-Hong, PENG Jia-Jia, WANG Zhao, ZHAO Kai, YUAN Su-Xia, MING Jun, LIU Chun. Studies on Polyploid Induction in Anthurium andraeanum Using Oryzalin,Trifluralin and Colchicine [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2014, 41(11): 2275-2280. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd