Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 202-218.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0073
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
LÜ Yaru1, LI Jie1, GU Xirong1,*(
), CUI Yao2, HU Jia1
Received:2025-04-24
Revised:2025-10-23
Online:2026-01-25
Published:2026-01-26
Contact:
GU Xirong
LÜ Yaru, LI Jie, GU Xirong, CUI Yao, HU Jia. Analysis of Fungal Community in Rhizosphere Soil of Rubus corchorifolius Under Four Forest Stands in Jinyun Mountain[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2026, 53(1): 202-218.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2025-0073
| 林地类型 Forest type | 植物种类 Plant species | 山莓果实品质 Rubus corchorifolius fruit quality |
|---|---|---|
| 山莓 Rubus corchorifolius | 山莓、葛藤、芭茅、火炭母 Rubus corchorifolius,Argyreia pierreana,Miscanthus floridulus,Polygonum chinense | 果中偏大,果甜较酸,香味多,味浓风味佳 The fruit is medium-large in size,with a sweet and moderately acidic flavor,a rich aroma,and a full-bodied,excellent taste |
| 马尾松 Pinus massoniana | 马尾松、山莓、杉木、毛桐、接骨草 Pinus massoniana,Rubus corchorifolius,Cunninghamia lanceolata,Mallotus japonicus,Sambucus chinensis | 果中偏大,果甜微酸,香味多,有特殊香气,味浓风味好 The fruit is medium-large in size,with a sweet and slightly acidic flavor,a rich and distinctive aroma,and a full-bodied,pleasant taste |
| 楠竹 Phyllostachys ubescens | 楠竹、山莓、蕨、鸢尾 Phyllostachys ubescens,Rubus corchorifolius,Pteridium aquilinum,Iris tectorum | 果中偏小,果较甜微酸,香味偏淡,籽多 The fruit is medium-small in size,with a relatively sweet and slightly acidic flavor,a faint aroma,and a high seed content |
| 柑橘 Citrus reticulata | 柑橘、山莓、燕麦、苎麻 Citrus reticulate,Rubus corchorifolius,Avena sativa,Boehmeria nivea | 果中偏小,果甜微酸,籽粒脆,香味较多,风味较好 The fruit is medium-small in size,with a sweet and slightly acidic flavor,crisp seeds,a pronounced aroma,and a good overall taste |
Table 1 Dominant plant species and fruit quality of Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Mount Jinyun
| 林地类型 Forest type | 植物种类 Plant species | 山莓果实品质 Rubus corchorifolius fruit quality |
|---|---|---|
| 山莓 Rubus corchorifolius | 山莓、葛藤、芭茅、火炭母 Rubus corchorifolius,Argyreia pierreana,Miscanthus floridulus,Polygonum chinense | 果中偏大,果甜较酸,香味多,味浓风味佳 The fruit is medium-large in size,with a sweet and moderately acidic flavor,a rich aroma,and a full-bodied,excellent taste |
| 马尾松 Pinus massoniana | 马尾松、山莓、杉木、毛桐、接骨草 Pinus massoniana,Rubus corchorifolius,Cunninghamia lanceolata,Mallotus japonicus,Sambucus chinensis | 果中偏大,果甜微酸,香味多,有特殊香气,味浓风味好 The fruit is medium-large in size,with a sweet and slightly acidic flavor,a rich and distinctive aroma,and a full-bodied,pleasant taste |
| 楠竹 Phyllostachys ubescens | 楠竹、山莓、蕨、鸢尾 Phyllostachys ubescens,Rubus corchorifolius,Pteridium aquilinum,Iris tectorum | 果中偏小,果较甜微酸,香味偏淡,籽多 The fruit is medium-small in size,with a relatively sweet and slightly acidic flavor,a faint aroma,and a high seed content |
| 柑橘 Citrus reticulata | 柑橘、山莓、燕麦、苎麻 Citrus reticulate,Rubus corchorifolius,Avena sativa,Boehmeria nivea | 果中偏小,果甜微酸,籽粒脆,香味较多,风味较好 The fruit is medium-small in size,with a sweet and slightly acidic flavor,crisp seeds,a pronounced aroma,and a good overall taste |
| 林地类型 Forest stand | pH | 有机碳/(g · kg-1) Organic carbon (SOC) | 总氮/(g · kg-1) Total N (TN) | 总磷/(g · kg-1) Total P (TP) | 总钾/(g · kg-1) Total K(TK) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 山莓Rubus corchorifolius | 4.79 ± 0.04 a | 12.60 ± 0.02 b | 1.61 ±0.00 b | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 10.80 ± 0.05 c |
| 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 4.69 ± 0.03 b | 12.30 ± 0.02 c | 1.96 ± 0.02 a | 1.07 ± 0.03 a | 19.50 ± 0.03 a |
| 楠竹Phyllostachys ubescens | 4.31 ± 0.01 c | 25.60 ± 0.13 a | 1.54 ± 0.02 c | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 12.20 ± 0.07 b |
| 柑橘Citrus reticulata | 4.37 ± 0.01 c | 8.67 ± 0.08 d | 1.16 ± 0 d | 0.34 ± 0.01 b | 8.71 ± 0.07 d |
| 林地类型 Forest stand | 碳氮比 C/N | 氮磷比 N/P | 碱解氮/(mg · kg-1)Available N(AN) | 有效磷/(mg · kg-1)Available P(AP) | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1)Available K(AK) |
| 山莓Rubus corchorifolius | 7.79 ± 0.00 b | 4.39 ± 0.27 a | 124.00 ± 1.17 a | 72.60 ± 0.63 a | 75.80 ± 0.10 b |
| 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 6.24 ± 0.07 c | 1.83 ± 0.07 c | 100.00 ± 1.03 b | 44.10 ± 0.09 b | 133.00 ± 0.27 a |
| 楠竹Phyllostachys ubescens | 16.60 ± 0.37 a | 4.16 ± 0.21 a | 99.30 ± 0.06 b | 24.60 ± 0.32 c | 24.00 ± 0.04 d |
| 柑橘Citrus reticulata | 7.43 ± 0.09 b | 3.47 ± 0.10 b | 83.90 ± 1.29 c | 14.20 ± 0.03 d | 39.80 ± 0.01 c |
Table 2 Nutrient content in rhizosphere soil of Rubus corchorifolius under 4 forest stands in Jinyun Mountain
| 林地类型 Forest stand | pH | 有机碳/(g · kg-1) Organic carbon (SOC) | 总氮/(g · kg-1) Total N (TN) | 总磷/(g · kg-1) Total P (TP) | 总钾/(g · kg-1) Total K(TK) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 山莓Rubus corchorifolius | 4.79 ± 0.04 a | 12.60 ± 0.02 b | 1.61 ±0.00 b | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 10.80 ± 0.05 c |
| 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 4.69 ± 0.03 b | 12.30 ± 0.02 c | 1.96 ± 0.02 a | 1.07 ± 0.03 a | 19.50 ± 0.03 a |
| 楠竹Phyllostachys ubescens | 4.31 ± 0.01 c | 25.60 ± 0.13 a | 1.54 ± 0.02 c | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 12.20 ± 0.07 b |
| 柑橘Citrus reticulata | 4.37 ± 0.01 c | 8.67 ± 0.08 d | 1.16 ± 0 d | 0.34 ± 0.01 b | 8.71 ± 0.07 d |
| 林地类型 Forest stand | 碳氮比 C/N | 氮磷比 N/P | 碱解氮/(mg · kg-1)Available N(AN) | 有效磷/(mg · kg-1)Available P(AP) | 速效钾/(mg · kg-1)Available K(AK) |
| 山莓Rubus corchorifolius | 7.79 ± 0.00 b | 4.39 ± 0.27 a | 124.00 ± 1.17 a | 72.60 ± 0.63 a | 75.80 ± 0.10 b |
| 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 6.24 ± 0.07 c | 1.83 ± 0.07 c | 100.00 ± 1.03 b | 44.10 ± 0.09 b | 133.00 ± 0.27 a |
| 楠竹Phyllostachys ubescens | 16.60 ± 0.37 a | 4.16 ± 0.21 a | 99.30 ± 0.06 b | 24.60 ± 0.32 c | 24.00 ± 0.04 d |
| 柑橘Citrus reticulata | 7.43 ± 0.09 b | 3.47 ± 0.10 b | 83.90 ± 1.29 c | 14.20 ± 0.03 d | 39.80 ± 0.01 c |
Fig. 1 Dilution curve(A)and Venn diagram(B)of OTU distribution in rhizosphere soil fungi of Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain RC:Rubus corchorifolius stand;CR:Citrus reticulata stand;PU:Phyllostachys ubescen stand;PM:Pinus massoniana stand. The same below
Fig. 2 Indexes of Sobs(A),Chao(B),Ace(C)and Shannon(D)of rhizosphere soil fungi of Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different forest stands at 0.05 level
Fig. 3 Principal Co-ordinates Analysis(PCoA)of the rhizosphere soil fungal community of Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain
Fig. 4 Classification results(A)and difference comparison(B)of the rhizosphere soil fungal at the phylum level of Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain The asterisk * in Fig. A indicates a significant difference among multiple groups(Kruskal-Wallis test),while in Fig. B,it signifies a significant difference between two groups(Wilcoxon test),P < 0.05 for both
Fig. 5 Classification results(A)and difference comparison(B)of the rhizosphere soil fungal at the genus level of the Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain The asterisk in Fig. 5,B indicates a significant difference among multiple groups(Kruskal-Wallis test)(P < 0.05)
Fig. 6 Biomarker with the rhizosphere soil of Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain Nodes of different colors indicate that microorganisms are significantly enriched in different groups,while light yellow nodes indicate no significant differences between groups. P:Phylum;C:Class;F:Family;O:Order;G:Genus
Fig. 7 Canonical Correspondence Analysis(CCA)of the rhizosphere soil fungal community of Rubus corchorifolius with soil nutrients content under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain Codes for nutrients refer to Table 2,and the same applies hereafter. In the diagram,samples from different environments or conditions are represented by points of varying colors or shapes. Red arrows indicate quantitative environmental variables. By projecting sample points onto the directional arrows of quantitative environmental variables,the distance from the projection point to the origin reflects the relative influence of the environmental variable on community distribution,while the directional alignment between sample points and arrows indicates positive or negative correlations
Fig. 8 Correlation between the rhizosphere soil nutrients of Rubus corchorifolius and dominant genus under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain N/P:Nitrogen-phosphorus ratio;C/N:Carbon-nitrogen ratio;SOC:Organic carbon;AN:Available N;AP:Available P;AK:Available K;TN:Total N;TK:Total K;TP:Total P. *:P < 0.05,**:P < 0.01,***:P < 0.001
| 指数 Index | pH | 有机碳 Organic carbon(SOC) | 总氮 Total N (TN) | 总磷 Total P (TP) | 总钾 Total K (TK) | 碳氮比 C/N | 氮磷比 N/P | 碱解氮 Available N(AN) | 有效磷Available P(AP) | 速效钾Available K(AK) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ace | 0.880** | -0.632* | 0.547 | 0.553 | 0.456 | -0.799** | -0.390 | 0.499 | 0.704* | 0.845** |
| Chao | 0.879** | -0.626* | 0.543 | 0.546 | 0.450 | -0.792** | -0.380 | 0.506 | 0.707* | 0.838** |
| 香农指数 Shannon’s index | 0.731** | 0.005 | 0.725** | 0.503 | 0.540 | -0.230 | -0.238 | 0.683* | 0.704* | 0.615* |
| 生态优势指数 Sobs index | 0.894** | -0.560 | 0.615* | 0.588* | 0.513 | -0.748** | -0.395 | 0.538 | 0.729** | 0.864** |
Table 3 Correlation between rhizosphere soil fungal community and soil nutrients of Rubus corchorifolius under four forest stands in Jinyun Mountain
| 指数 Index | pH | 有机碳 Organic carbon(SOC) | 总氮 Total N (TN) | 总磷 Total P (TP) | 总钾 Total K (TK) | 碳氮比 C/N | 氮磷比 N/P | 碱解氮 Available N(AN) | 有效磷Available P(AP) | 速效钾Available K(AK) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ace | 0.880** | -0.632* | 0.547 | 0.553 | 0.456 | -0.799** | -0.390 | 0.499 | 0.704* | 0.845** |
| Chao | 0.879** | -0.626* | 0.543 | 0.546 | 0.450 | -0.792** | -0.380 | 0.506 | 0.707* | 0.838** |
| 香农指数 Shannon’s index | 0.731** | 0.005 | 0.725** | 0.503 | 0.540 | -0.230 | -0.238 | 0.683* | 0.704* | 0.615* |
| 生态优势指数 Sobs index | 0.894** | -0.560 | 0.615* | 0.588* | 0.513 | -0.748** | -0.395 | 0.538 | 0.729** | 0.864** |
| [1] |
doi: 10.3390/ijms20174199 URL |
| [2] |
|
|
鲍士旦. 2000. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
|
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
|
崔瑶, 辜夕容, 严宁珍, 李杰, 胡佳, 杨莉荟, 李得霞, 罗平. 2022. 缙云山4种林分土壤无机磷与活性铝的含量及分布. 生态学报, 42 (5):1727-1738.
|
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
doi: 10.1111/nph.16345 pmid: 31778576 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
|
李杰, 辜夕容, 崔瑶, 胡佳, 王小河. 2024. 疏枝和刻伤对山莓果实产量和品质的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),(4):1-10.
|
|
| [11] |
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078118 URL |
| [12] |
doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1506-7 URL |
| [13] |
|
|
刘晓捷. 2006. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对黑莓扦插苗耐盐性以及抗旱性的影响[硕士论文]. 重庆: 西南大学.
|
|
| [14] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0187 |
|
刘英浩, 李允, 吕伟静, 陈冉, 姜伟涛, 尹承苗, 毛志泉, 王艳芳. 2024. 不同温度烧制的生物炭对苹果连作土壤真菌群落结构的影响. 园艺学报, 51 (8):1853-1867.
|
|
| [15] |
|
|
刘运. 2023. 马尾松人工林林下种植模式对土壤及森林健康影响分析. 中国林副特产,(5):79-80.
|
|
| [16] |
|
|
马垒, 赵文慧, 郭志彬, 王道中, 赵炳梓. 2019. 长期不同磷肥施用量对砂姜黑土真菌多样性、群落组成和种间关系的影响. 生态学报, 39 (11):4158-4167.
|
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
|
孟芳. 2007. 接种AM菌根菌对树莓铁素吸收效应的影响研究[硕士论文]. 重庆: 西南大学.
|
|
| [19] |
|
|
国家林业和草原局. 2021. 国家林业和草原局关于印发《全国林下经济发展指南(2021—2030年)》的通知. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-12/04/content_5655829.htm.
|
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
|
倪惠菁, 储昊煜, 苏文会, 范少辉. 2023. 经营强度对毛竹林土壤团聚体稳定性和碳氮磷分布的影响. 应用生态学报, 34 (4):928-936.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202304.002 |
|
| [22] |
|
|
倪秀雅, 冯永霞, 李如华, 尚鹤, 陈展. 2023. 重庆酸雨区不同林型对土壤酸化和真菌群落的影响. 生态学报,(17):1-13.
|
|
| [23] |
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.034 URL |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
|
素平, 田叶韩, 王建明, 何邦令, 李明潭, 高克祥. 2017. 毛壳菌肥对黄瓜生长、产量和品质及氮磷钾吸收的影响. 中国农学通报, 33 (11):35-42.
|
|
| [26] |
doi: 10.1080/15226514.2021.1889966 URL |
| [27] |
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5594 pmid: 26315429 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
|
王诗慧, 常顺利, 李鑫, 张毓涛. 2021. 天山林区土壤真菌多样性及其群落结构. 生态学报, 41 (1):124-134.
|
|
| [30] |
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.011 |
|
吴安琪, 张扬, 万松泽, 方向民, 刘仁, 胡添翼, 陈伏生. 2019. 一株金黄蓝状菌解磷特性及其对毛竹的促生效应. 应用生态学报, 30 (1):173-179.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.011 |
|
| [31] |
|
|
伍少福, 韩科峰, 吴良欢. 2024. 生物有机肥加专用肥对葡萄园土壤养分、微生物和产量的影响. 园艺学报, 51 (5):1099-1112.
|
|
| [32] |
|
|
吴正超, 刘小虎, 高晓宁, 李亮亮. 2013. 沈阳东陵树莓种植区土壤养分状况调查与分析. 北方园艺,(15):176-180.
|
|
| [33] |
|
|
许秀兰, 杨春琳, 田莎, 姜欣华, 刘韩, 刘应高. 2016. 华山松凋落针叶上的真菌多样性及4株真菌的纤维素分解能力. 林业科学, 52 (1):80-88.
|
|
| [34] |
|
|
杨涵, 靳芙蓉, 关统伟, 徐红星, 胡小朋, 谢强. 2021. 有机肥替代部分化肥对温室土壤肥力和真菌群落的短期影响. 西北农业学报, 30 (3):422-430.
|
|
| [35] |
|
|
杨继芬, 李永梅, 李春培, 芦美, 赵吉霞. 2023. 大豆玉米间作提高红壤团聚体中真菌群落结构和多样性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 29 (5):889-899.
|
|
| [36] |
|
|
杨涛, 周慧, 张于光, 高必达, 李迪强. 2009. 云南高黎贡山土壤可培养降解纤维素真菌的多样性. 生态学报, 29 (4):1971-1979.
|
|
| [37] |
|
|
姚蒙蒙. 2022. 晋北盐碱草地特征及其对植物群落、土壤性质和丛枝菌根真菌多样性的影响[硕士论文]. 晋中: 山西农业大学.
|
|
| [38] |
|
|
张丽, 王燕, 陈清, 罗娅, 张勇, 汤浩茹, 王小蓉. 2015. 基于ndhF序列的中国悬钩子属植物系统发育研究. 园艺学报, 42 (1):19-30.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0752 |
|
| [39] |
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202204.018 |
|
张义杰, 徐杰, 陆仁窗, 叶辰, 黄惠川, 杨敏, 何霞红, 朱书生. 2022. 生石灰对林下酸化土壤的调控作用及三七生长的影响. 应用生态学报, 33 (4):972-980.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202204.018 |
|
| [40] |
doi: 10.3390/f13020223 URL |
| [41] |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16881-7 |
| [1] | GAO Yongchen, SU Xinjian, YU Cheng, LIU Zhu, MAO Ke, ZOU Yangjun, GONG Xiaoqing. Effects of Black Nonwovens and Herb Residue Mulching on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Microorganisms in the Apple Orchard [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(3): 587-600. |
| [2] | PAN Jiyuan, DONG Qinglong, WEN Haibin, LIU Yanan, WANG Xiaojie, ZHANG Xuemei, LIU Wenju, LU Xiujun. Effects of Bacillus megaterium on Yield,Quality and Soil Microorganism of Apple [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(11): 2453-2465. |
| [3] | SHU Zaifa, JI Qingyong, SHAO Jingna, ZHENG Shenghong, ZHOU Huijuan, HE Weizhong. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacement on Soil Nutrients in Tea Garden and Yield-quality of Tea Plant [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(10): 2207-2219. |
| [4] | WANG Xiaofang1,2,*,XIANG Kun2,*,WANG Yanfang3,LI Qianjin4,JIANG Weitao1,SHENG Yuefan1,WANG Haiyan1,CHEN Xuesen1,YIN Chengmiao1,and MAO Zhiquan1,**. Effects of Tagetes erecta Biofumigation on Apple Replanted Soil Environment and Physiological Characteristics of Malus hupehensis Seedlings [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2019, 46(12): 2383-2396. |
| [5] | CHEN Xue-sen1,*,ZHANG Rui-jie1,WANG Yan-ting2,WANG Nan1,JIANG Sheng-hui1,XU Hai-feng1,LIU Jing-xuan1,WANG De-yun1,QU Chang-zhi1,ZHANG Yan-min1,JIANG Yuan-mao1,and MAO Zhi-quan1 . Effects of Growing Hairy Vetch(Vicia villosa)on the Soil Nutrient,Enzyme Activities and Microorganisms in Apple Orchard [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2016, 43(12): 2325-2334. |
| [6] | ZHANG Dong*,ZHENG Li-wei*,HAN Ming-yu**,GAO Chen-xi,LUO Wen-wen,and MA Juan-juan. Studies of the Standard Range of the Soil Nutrients in Apple Orchard in Loess Plateau [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2016, 43(1): 121-131. |
| [7] | FU Xue-Qin, LIU Ju-Er, HUANG Wen-Xin. Effects of Natural Grass on Soil Microbiology,Nutrient and Fruit Quality of Nanfeng Tangerine Yard [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2015, 42(8): 1551-1558. |
| [8] | TANG Yu-Qin, PENG Liang-Zhi, CHUN Chang-Pin, LING Li-Li, FANG Yi-Wen, YAN Xiang. Correlation Analysis on Nutrient Element Contents in Orchard Soils and Sweet Orange Leaves in Southern Jiangxi Province of China [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2013, 40(4): 623-. |
| [9] | XI Zhu-mei;LI Hua;LONG Yan;ZHANG Jin;and PANG Xue-liang. Variation of Soil Microbial Populations and Relationships Between Microbial Factors and Soil Nutrients in Cover Cropping System of Vineyard [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2010, 37(9): 1395-1402. |
| [10] | PAN Xue-jun;;ZHANG Wen-e;FAN Wei-guo;PENG Gui-hua;and LUO Guo-hua;. Effects of Sod Culture and Intercropping Green Manure on the Soil Nutrient,Enzyme Activities and Microorganisms in Bonsai Citrus [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2010, 37(8): 1235-1240. |
| [11] | DU She-ni;BAI Gang-shuan;. Astragalus adsurgens Is not Suitable Interplant in Armeniaca vulgaris×A. sibiricaOrchard in Loess Hilly and Gully Region [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2007, 34(5): 1135-1140. |
| [12] | Li_Hui-ke;Zhang Guang-Jun;Zhao Zheng-Yang;and Li Kai-Rong. Effects of herbage-interplanted on soil Nutrient of non-irrigated apple orchard in the Loess Plateau [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2007, 34(2): 477-480. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd