蝴蝶兰不同品种耐冷特性的研究

园艺学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 425-430.

蝴蝶兰不同品种耐冷特性的研究

刘学庆^1,2;王秀峰^1*;朴永吉¹

(¹山东农业大学园艺科学与工程学院, 山东泰安271018; ²山东烟台市农业科学研究院, 山东烟台265500)

收稿日期:2006-09-21 修回日期:2007-01-15 出版日期:2007-04-25 发布日期:2007-04-25
通讯作者: 王秀峰

A Study on Cold Tolerance of Different Phalaenopsis Cultivars

LIU Xue-qing^1,2,WANG Xiu-feng^1*,and PIAO Yong-ji¹

(¹College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taipan, Shandong 271018, China;²Yantai Academy of Agricultural Science, Yantai, Shandong 265500, China)

Received:2006-09-21 Revised:2007-01-15 Online:2007-04-25 Published:2007-04-25
Contact: WANG Xiu-feng

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以6个蝴蝶兰( Phalaenopsis spp. ) 品种为试材, 测定了不同低温、处理时间及温度回升过程中叶绿素含量、Fv/Fm、MDA含量及SOD活性等变化。结果表明: 在11℃/6℃条件下, NK1和GL14两个品种受冷害程度最轻, 温度回升10 d时两品种的叶绿素含量和Fv/Fm恢复为处理前的84.9%、43.3%和91.3%、24.8% , 恢复能力较强, 为耐冷品种; GL11和JT944受冷害严重, 温度回升10 d时, 上述指标分别为处理前的2.3%、6.3%和0、0, 难以恢复正常水平, 为不耐冷品种; 其余两个品种为中等耐冷品种。在14℃/9℃条件下, 只有GL11受到严重伤害, 表明大部分蝴蝶兰品种的耐受极限夜温为9℃以下。叶绿素含量、Fv/Fm及SOD活性对温度变化敏感, 能够及时反应出蝴蝶兰在低温胁迫下的变化状况, 可作为鉴定蝴蝶兰耐冷性强弱的指标。MDA含量变化较复杂, 规律性不强, 不宜作为蝴蝶兰耐冷性鉴定的指标。

关键词: 蝴蝶兰, 耐冷性, 叶绿素含量, Fv/Fm, MDA, SOD

Abstract: Changes in chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameter (Fv/Fm) , MDA content and SOD activity in the leaves of six Phalaenopsis cultivarswere studied during different low temperature treatments, and during recovery. The results showed that the cold damage on leaves at 11℃/6℃ was different among cultivars. The damage on leaves of GL11 and JT944 wasmore serious than NK1 and GL14. After 10 d of recovery, chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm in NK1 and GL14 were 84.9% , 43.3% , 91.3% and 24.8% of those before cold treatment, respectively. In contrast, chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm in GL11 and JT944 at 10 d of recovery were only 2.3% , 6.3%, 0 and 0, respectively. NK1 and GL14 had a higher recovery capacity. So it is concluded that NK1 and GL14 were cold2tolerant and GL11 and JT944 were cold-sensitive.The rests were intermediate in cold tolerance, GL11 was the only cultivar that was severely injured under 14℃/9℃, which indicated that the threshold low temperature at night endurable bymost of Phalaenopsis cultivars was below 9℃. The changes in chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm and SOD activity under different cold temperatureswere significant and could be used to indicate the cold tolerance of Phalaenopsis. MDA content did not show consistent changes under cold temperatures.

Key words: Pha laenopsis, Cold tolerance, Chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm, MDA, SOD

中图分类号:

S 682.31

刘学庆;王秀峰;朴永吉. 蝴蝶兰不同品种耐冷特性的研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(2): 425-430.

LIU Xue-qing;WANG Xiu-feng;and PIAO Yong-ji. A Study on Cold Tolerance of Different Phalaenopsis Cultivars[J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2007, 34(2): 425-430.

[1]	陆楚桥, 高洁, 谢琦, 魏永路, 金建鹏, 杨凤玺, 朱根发. 蝴蝶兰新品种‘金象’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 139-140.
[2]	聂鑫淼, 栾恒, 冯改利, 王超, 李岩, 魏珉. 硅营养和嫁接砧木对黄瓜幼苗耐冷性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(8): 1795-1804.
[3]	吴婷, 贾瑞冬, 杨树华, 赵鑫, 于晓南, 国圆, 葛红. 蝴蝶兰多倍体育种研究进展与展望[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(2): 448-462.
[4]	陈和明, 王真, 吕复兵, 肖文芳, 李佐, 尤毅. 蝴蝶兰新品种"迷你象"[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(12): 2527-2528.
[5]	吕复兵, 陈和明, 李佐, 肖文芳, 尤毅. 蝴蝶兰新品种‘如玉’[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(11): 2323-2324.
[6]	陈春, 庄西卿, 陈孝丑, 张毅智, 林成立, 王勇. 蝴蝶兰新品种‘红天鹅’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 3049-3050.
[7]	许申平，张燕，袁秀云，崔波*. 依据显微结构及光合特性探讨蝴蝶兰花芽分化的时期[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(7): 1359-1368.
[8]	吕复兵，陈和明，李佐，肖文芳. 蝴蝶兰新品种‘小桃’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(7): 1425-1426.
[9]	张燕，许申平，梁芳，蒋素华，袁秀云，牛苏燕，崔波*. 蝴蝶兰PhSVP的克隆及其在花发育过程中的表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6): 1111-1125.
[10]	张少伟1,，袁超1,，牛义1,，汤青林1，魏大勇1，王永清2，田时炳2，杨洋2,，王志敏1,*. 茄子花药开裂相关基因SmDAD1 启动子的克隆及功能分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(4): 643-652.
[11]	刘富中, 张映, 杨锦坤, 陈钰辉, 舒金帅, 李淑培, 陈露露. 茄子叶色黄化突变体的特征及遗传分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(12): 2340-2348.
[12]	崔波1,*，郝平安2，梁芳1，张燕1，王喜蒙1,4，李俊霖1,3，蒋素华1，许申平1. 蝴蝶兰AP2/ERF家族基因的克隆及在低温下表达特性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(1): 85-97.
[13]	韩敏1，曹逼力1，刘树森2，徐坤1,*. 番茄嫁接苗根穗互作对其耐冷性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(2): 279-288.
[14]	吕复兵，陈和明，肖文芳，李佐，蒋明殿. 蝴蝶兰新品种‘滴彩’[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(2): 405-406.
[15]	刘亚静，马齐军，路静，郝玉金，由春香*. 苹果bZIP转录因子基因MdAREB2功能的初步研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(1): 1-10.